Politics
Naomi Osaka’s Postpartum Journey Showed Me I Wasn’t A Bad Mother
There is no doubt that Naomi Osaka is blossoming again. During media day ahead of the Mubadala Open in Washington, D.C., this week, she spoke with renewed confidence about trusting herself. And she should. Osaka has put together one of the strongest stretches of tennis since becoming a mother.
This is despite struggling with a bout of postpartum depression she called “extremely bad” in her documentary, Naomi Osaka: The Second Set.
She said: “…During those early months, I felt like a shell of myself at all moments of the day. I no longer knew who I was anymore. It felt like everyone else had moved on and they were living in colour. Meanwhile, my world was stuck in grey.”
Call it a parasocial relationship, but as Osaka continues to reclaim herself after childbirth, I find myself celebrating far more than her victories on the tennis court. Every outfit, every hard-fought match, every smile with Taylor Townsend is a reminder that Black mothers, like Osaka, like me, can make it through postpartum depression.
July is National Minority Mental Health Awareness Month, a reminder that while conversations around mental health have become more common, too many Black women continue to suffer in silence. We are less likely to be diagnosed and treated for postpartum depression and anxiety despite facing higher rates of stress, barriers to care and cultural expectations that tell us to just keep “locking in”.
Before my daughter was born, I knew motherhood would change me. I expected sleepless nights, breastfeeding and shifting personal dynamics. But I didn’t expect the world to feel dull or to look in the mirror with tears in my eyes because a stranger was staring back at me.
Not just because my body was different, but because who I was had changed forever. It felt like the brightest parts of me were gone. The self-confidence I’d worked to garner dissipated.
My favourite metaphor for motherhood is the flamingo. After giving birth, flamingos lose their vibrant pink colour because every nutrient in their bodies is redirected toward feeding their babies. It can take up to a year before their feathers regain their signature colour. The flamingo survives, but it is transformed.
That was motherhood for me. But it took me much longer than a flamingo to get my colour back.
There are whole stretches of time from my daughter’s earliest years that I cannot remember. My husband will show me pictures, and it’s as if someone removed pages from a photo album. Those missing memories still grieve me because I know I was physically there, yet I cannot access that time. I desperately want to revisit them, but they are simply gone.
That is what postpartum anxiety and depression can do to the mind. It’s not simply mood swings, but a change in the brain’s cognitive ability and health.
People often assume Black women go untreated because we don’t have access to care. That wasn’t my story. I had a therapist. I had physicians. I had family and friends who loved me. I had a husband who wanted to support me.
I was consumed with social media videos where mothers of all races and ages make it seem like motherhood comes naturally, and that women simply “figure it out.” So when I found myself anxious, disconnected and emotionally exhausted, I convinced myself I just wasn’t cut out for motherhood.
My daughter did not in fact have the right mama, I decided. She had a broken one.
The truth is, motherhood in America asks an extraordinary amount of women, particularly Black women. I wish we could be like the flamingo, where all of our efforts go to feeding our babies. In reality, breastfeeding our children barely scratches the surface of the labour and anxieties that come with our new role.
The disproportionate rates of Black maternal death reflect the constant threat of neglect and violence Black women face before and during childbirth. Once our children are earthside, we have less means to navigate skyrocketing child care costs and soaring inflation. The recent death of Nolan Wells, a young Black boy who went missing and then was found dead, is every mother’s worst nightmare.
Black children go missing without urgency from law enforcement, and too many are never found – or are found too late. Among all of this, his mother, Christine Wonsley, is receiving hate mail and online harassment, a case study in vilification of Black mothers.
All of these factors would drive any sane person insane.

KIRILL KUDRYAVTSEV via Getty Images
When Osaka reflected on her return to tennis after motherhood, she gave voice to feelings I hadn’t been able to name, saying, “I struggled with constant fear and anxiety, and an overall lack of self-confidence in every decision I made.” Before she ever put words to it, though, I thought I could see it in her – the sadness behind her eyes, the uncertainty, the search for herself.
As I watched her compete, I realised I wasn’t simply following one of the greatest athletes of her generation. I was watching another Black mother work through postpartum struggles to find her new colours. In her vulnerability, I finally recognised my own reflection.
I had language for feelings buried beneath guilt and unrealistic expectations. And Osaka’s healing journey made room for me. I started taking anti-anxiety medications, going to the gym and finding community with other mothers who understood that motherhood could be both beautiful and incredibly lonely.
Little by little, I got my colour back. I became more confident in my role, not just as a mother, but as a friend, wife and my own person.
That is why Naomi Osaka’s comeback matters so much.
We often talk about representation in terms of Black women breaking barriers and shattering glass ceilings. We talk less about representation in healing. Watching another Black mother survive something we’ve endured gives us permission to believe survival is possible for us, too – and to seek the help that makes it possible.
Julienne Louis-Anderson is a Black mother who writes about the intersection of culture and politics with education and human development. She is also a Public Voices Fellow of The OpEd Project in partnership with the National Black Child Development Institute.
Do you have a compelling personal story you’d like to see published on HuffPost? Find out what we’re looking for here and send us a pitch at pitch@huffpost.com.
Politics
The Worst Foods To Eat Before Oral Sex, According To Experts
Oral sex is one of the most intimate sex acts – because your partner is literally tasting you in a way that you yourself have probably never experienced.
Wanting to taste good for your partner is perfectly normal, too. After all, the thought of someone grimacing the moment they put their mouth on you or fretting about how you taste is certainly enough to kill the mood.
While many people believe certain foods can dramatically improve the way you taste – like the old wives tales around pineapple we’ve all heard for years – the actual science is less convincing.
“There isn’t enough scientific data on one type of food alone to cause a dramatic improvement in taste or sexual experiences,” Dr. Kezia Joy, a medical adviser at Welzo, told HuffPost.
“On the other hand, consuming an optimal amount of fruit (and vegetables) and hydrating adequately will help to create a healthy oral environment, provide you with fresh breath and a general feeling of wellness that could both contribute to an improved experience during sex.”

Connect Images via Getty Images
That said, while there’s little evidence that any one food can make you taste significantly better, some foods may still influence or change your natural scent and flavour more than others.
But if you’ve got oral sex on the agenda and have concerns about your own smell and taste, these are the foods experts say you may want to avoid beforehand.
Garlic and onions
Garlic and onions are among the biggest offenders because their odour doesn’t just linger on your breath – it can linger on your body all night.
“When we ingest strong odorants (garlic, onions, certain spicy dishes, heavily seasoned meals), these chemicals remain in the bloodstream for some time after we brush our teeth and can continue to produce odor even long after we have cleansed our mouth,” Joy said.
Sex and intimacy coach Annette Benedetti, host of the podcast Talk Sex With Annette, agreed, adding that “heavy garlic and onion … can all shift how you taste and smell”.
“None of it is dangerous; it’s just stronger and more bitter,” she said.
Asparagus
Asparagus has long had a reputation for affecting body odour, and Benedetti said there’s a reason it’s worth mentioning.
“Asparagus is the big one. The sulfur compounds show up fast in body fluids, and the smell is unmistakable,” she said.
Alcohol
A drink or two may help settle first-date nerves, but too much alcohol can have the opposite effect in the bedroom.
“Excessive alcohol use will dry out the mucous membranes of your mouth, which reduces saliva production, allowing odour-causing bacteria to thrive,” Joy said.
Dietitian Karen E. Todd added that “dehydration from alcohol can cause dry mouth and make oral sex uncomfortable for the recipient and less enjoyable for the giver”.
Spicy foods
If you’re planning on getting intimate, you may want to think twice before ordering the extra-spicy dish on the menu.
“Hot, spicy foods (particularly jalapeños) can cause irritation on the lips and in the mouth, and it may last for some time,” Todd said,
Sugary foods
Ordering dessert might not be the best choice either. You might have to skip it and savour your time in bed as your sweet treat.
“Additional sugars may temporarily provide environmental conditions for bacteria to grow more rapidly in the mouth,” Joy explained, which wouldn’t make for the most pleasant experience if you’re giving oral.
Coffee and cigarettes
If you’re relying on caffeine and your smoke break to get through the workday, moderation may be your friend before a hookup.
Benedetti said that “too much coffee, alcohol and cigarettes can all shift how you taste and smell”.
Heavy or rich meals
It’s not just what you eat but how it makes you feel afterward.
“We are all at risk from large or over-richly prepared meals that may cause gas, acid reflux and/or general uncomfortable feelings of illness, which could make intimate activity less pleasant for either partner,” Joy said.
So, what should you eat?
Unfortunately, there’s no magic food that’s guaranteed to make you taste better.
In fact, Benedetti said, social media has oversold the idea that certain foods – especially pineapple – can improve the way you taste.
The idea that “pineapple works like a magic potion” is one of the biggest myths she’d like to see disappear.“Eating pineapple an hour before does not transform anything,” Benedetti said. “Diet influences taste modestly and over time – think hours to days, not minutes.”
Todd agreed that the evidence is limited: “There is not a lot of scientific evidence to support or refute the claims of food altering taste in oral sex,” she said. “The most influential factor on taste would possibly be hydration, but this has not been proven or disproven.”
She added that while there’s little research backing specific foods, fruits – including “fresh pineapple, citrus fruits, berries and melons” – are the ones most commonly reported to improve taste.
Joy echoed that hydration may be the most important factor. She noted that fruits with a high water content may temporarily freshen breath, but “claims regarding specific foods that greatly alter body fluid dynamics are largely anecdotal and do not have strong support from medical literature.”
So, if you ordered spaghetti and meatballs with a side of asparagus before heading to your date’s place, don’t panic.
Benedetti’s advice is refreshingly reassuring: “Nobody has ever pulled away mid-oral because you had pasta. Your partner is there because they want you. Shower, hydrate, relax.
“Anxiety kills more oral sex than asparagus ever has.”
Politics
Politics Home Article | Labour’s Bev Craig Wins Greater Manchester Mayoral Contest

2 min read
Labour candidate Bev Craig has been elected as the next Mayor of Greater Manchester, securing a comfortable victory to succeed the new Prime Minister, Andy Burnham.
She won 309,525 votes (around 66 per cent), with Reform UK candidate Sian Astley receiving 157,178 (around 34 per cent), once first and second preferences were taken into account.
Craig, a close Burnham ally who has led Manchester Council since 2021, said: “I am honoured, I am humbled, and I stand ready to serve the three million people that live across this fantastic city region.”
The turnout was relatively low at just over 25 per cent.
Labour will now need to choose a new leader of the council to succeed Craig.
The by-election in Manchester was triggered after Burnham won a parliamentary by-election in Makerfield, returning to Westminster as an MP and becoming PM just weeks later.
The Greens were initially confident of success in Greater Manchester, following their victory in the Gorton and Denton parliamentary by-election in February.
Former leader of the Green Party Caroline Lucas told The House in June that the party would be “throwing everything” at the contest.
However, after the first round of voting in Greater Manchester, the Greens were in third place on 12 per cent. Rupert Lowe’s Restore Britain got 9 per cent, the Conservatives 8 per cent, and the Liberal Democrats 3 per cent.
The election used a more proportional voting system than first-past-the-post, in which voters express a first and second choice. Under the system, if no candidate secures 50 per cent of the votes after the first round, then the top two candidates will be given the second preference votes from the defeated candidates.
Politics
The House Opinion Article | No 10 North could change who runs Britain

4 min read
Privately educated Londoners still dominate decision-making. We now have a chance to reverse that trend.
Someone who attended a private school in London or the South East is 24 times more likely to become a permanent secretary than someone educated at a state school in the North. For a seat in the House of Lords, the gap is 23-fold.
That is not class inequality plus regional inequality. It is what happens when they multiply.
It is also the case for No 10 North: The North does not just need a stronger presence in Whitehall. Britain needs another route into national power.
Sutton Trust research into the regional backgrounds of top government officials reveals just how narrow the existing route remains. London and the South East account for 28 per cent of the population, but half of permanent secretaries, 52 per cent of special advisers and 46 per cent of peers went to school there. Just 17 per cent of permanent secretaries and peers were educated anywhere in northern England.
MPs offer a revealing counterexample. Their regional backgrounds almost mirror the population: 29 per cent were educated in London and the South East, compared with 28 per cent nationally; 24 per cent in the North, compared with 23 per cent. When voters choose, Britain looks like Britain, at least geographically. The distortion is greatest where access to power depends on less visible processes of recruitment, progression and appointment.
That tells us something important. Britain does not lack talent outside London and the South East. Its institutions are failing to find, develop and promote enough of it.
Location acts as a hidden credential. Proximity brings access; access brings relationships and sponsorship; those advantages compound. A government concentrated in one city naturally draws its leaders from those who study, live and work within its orbit.
I attended a state school in County Durham and, like many northerners, my route into national life ran south. Yet our figures classify people by where they went to school, not where they later worked. Northerners have moved to London for generations but remain scarce at the top. Even when talent moves south, it is too often overlooked, while the places it has left lose it anyway.
A privately educated Londoner is 24 times more likely than a state-educated northerner to reach the top of the civil service. If that gap remains in a decade, No 10 North will have changed the state’s address, but not its character
No 10 North could break that cycle. But we have been here before. The Treasury’s Darlington campus and Places for Growth moved thousands of civil service jobs out of London without moving decision-making. Jobs relocated; power stayed put.
To avoid the same fate, No 10 North must become a genuine second centre of government, with responsibility for major priorities, control over budgets and direct access to the Prime Minister. When the next spending review settles regional transport and regeneration funding, will those decisions be made in Manchester, or just announced there? Civil servants should be able to reach the top without moving south, with recruitment extending into local government, business, and civil society.
Getting this right would benefit the whole country. Leaders drawn disproportionately from one region give the state a narrower understanding of the nation it governs. Burnham rightly frames the idea not as a prize for the North, but as a way to make power flow into the Midlands, South West and East of England too. The goal is a state that draws talent from every part of Britain, rather than treating regional background as an implicit signal of who belongs at the top.
No 10 North should complement, not replace, devolution: local leaders still need the authority and resources to shape their places, while national government must distribute its own power more widely.
The initiative should ultimately be judged by where decisions are made and who makes them. Our research offers a benchmark: today, a privately educated Londoner is 24 times more likely than a state-educated northerner to reach the top of the civil service. If that gap remains in a decade, No 10 North will have changed the state’s address, but not its character.
The North does not need a better hearing in Westminster. It needs a greater hand in running Britain.
Nick Harrison is the Chief Executive of the Sutton Trust
Politics
Trump Offers Word-Salad Gibberish To Explain His Position On Patriots For Ukraine
WASHINGTON ― President Donald Trump on Friday offered a 645-word string of incoherent non-sequiturs to explain whether he is honoring a previous commitment to let Ukraine build its own Patriot anti-missile interceptor factory to defend itself against Russian attacks.
“We have not agreed to that. We’re talking about it. But it’s a hard thing to give away that kind of technology. And I don’t think this would ever happen, but, you know, you give that technology, they can someday turn on you. You know, that is possible. You look at war, it’s happened a couple of times over the years, right,” Trump said, answering a reporter’s question about whether he was now reneging on his pledge from just three weeks ago.
His lengthy response included explosion noises, an attack on former President Joe Biden’s mental acuity, an exploration of whether high-tech computer chips could be copied, and an acknowledgment that the US copies technologies in the same way as China, among various other topics. In his answer, he twice mentioned Tomahawks, a completely different missile that was not asked about.
At the end, even after an attempted follow-up ― the 283-word answer to which inexplicably detoured to India, Pakistan, Congo and Rwanda ― it was unclear what Trump meant.
His White House officials did not respond to requests for clarification.
Ukrainian officials, meanwhile, said they were proceeding based on the commitment made earlier this month, which was reaffirmed at the Oval Office meeting between Trump and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy on Tuesday, and further affirmed in a phone call between Zelenskyy and Vice President JD Vance on Friday morning.
“We followed up on our recent meeting with President Trump in Washington, which was positive and productive,” Zelenskyy wrote in a social media post after the call. “As Russia’s air attacks on our country continue unabated, air defense – specifically Patriot interceptors against ballistic missiles – remains a top priority.”
Trump publicly announced at the NATO summit in Ankara, at a photo opportunity with Zelenskyy, that Ukraine would be granted a licence to manufacture interceptors for its Patriot anti-missile system, which are currently scarce because so many have been used in Trump’s war against Iran.
“We’re going to give a license to you to make Patriots. That’s pretty cool, right? This way he can’t complain that we’re not giving them enough. Make them yourself,” Trump said on July 8.
Questions about Trump’s commitment to that pledge, though, arose after his interview with the Financial Times on Thursday, during which he said the following about the Patriot license: “It’s a very extraordinary weapon, and we have to be a little bit careful of who we license to.”
Ukraine’s ambassador to the United States, Olga Stefanishyna, on Thursday told reporters that officials from US defence contractors that make the Patriot system have already visited Ukraine and plans were proceeding. She said an interceptor factory could be up and running inside of a year, and that Russian dictator Vladimir Putin is now using more ballistic missiles to target civilians in her country because those are the only weapons Ukraine has not been able to counter with its home-grown defense industry.
“We have been effective in every domain except in an anti-ballistic missile technology,” Stefanishyna said.
Trump has long admired Putin, who has been charged with war crimes for his actions against Ukraine, and at the start of the invasion praised it as “genius” and “savvy.” Since then he has blamed Putin and Zelenskyy equally for the war’s continuance and drawn a moral equivalence between Putin’s murder of civilians and Zelenskyy’s attacks against Russian oil infrastructure.
The president repeated that argument Friday at the photo opportunity before a Cabinet meeting he was hosting at Camp David, suggesting that Russia’s war of conquest is still going on because of the personal animosity between Zelenskyy and Putin.
He said, “There’s a lot of dislike, as you probably notice.”
Politics
Candidates Who Could Stop Trump From Stealing The Election
When President Donald Trump tried to steal the 2020 election, he tried to bully Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger, a Republican, into changing the vote total to put him one vote ahead of Joe Biden.
“What I want to do is this. I just want to find, uh, 11,780 votes, which is one more than we have, because we won the state,” Trump said to Raffensperger in a phone call on Jan. 2, 2021.
But Raffensperger refused. Trump attempted a coup that failed a few days later, but his lies about the 2020 election became cant among Republican politicians.
All Republicans who seek a Trump endorsement or nomination must affirm, in some manner, Trump’s false claim that he won the 2020 election. There are no Republicans like Raffensperger running and winning their primaries anymore. (Raffensperger himself earned just 15% of the vote in the Republican primary when he ran for governor this year.)
That makes the elections for secretary of state in swing states like Georgia, Arizona, Nevada and Michigan — all states that Trump attempted to steal in 2020 — vital for Democrats to win in 2026 if they hope to protect their citizens’ right to vote from the president’s interference in 2028.
“We must win Arizona, we must win Nevada, we must win Michigan and we have to try to take Georgia, because ’26 is about ’28,” said Nevada Secretary of State Cisco Aguilar, who is currently running for reelection. “If we can elect strong Democratic secretaries of state, we know that our elections in ’28 are going to be protected from the federal government.”
In Arizona and Nevada, the Republican candidates are outright election deniers who worked tirelessly to steal the 2020 election for Trump and, in Arizona, to steal the 2022 gubernatorial election for Republican Kari Lake.
In Georgia and Michigan, the Republican candidates are not explicit election deniers, but have lent support for Trump’s push to federalize elections, seize voter data and spread fears of mass noncitizen voting. None of the four Republican candidates immediately responded to HuffPost’s request for comment.

Chase Stevens/Las Vegas Review-Journal via Getty Images
Democratic incumbents Adrian Fontes and Aguilar are running for reelection in Arizona and Nevada, respectively. Fontes faces Republican state lawmaker Alexander Kolodin, while Aguilar is in a rematch with his 2022 opponent Jim Marchant.
In Michigan, Lt. Gov. Garlin Gilchrist (D) is running against Macomb County Clerk Anthony Forlini (R) to fill the office that Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson (D) is vacating as she runs for governor.
Judge Penny Brown Reynolds (D) faces state lawmaker Tim Fleming (R) in Georgia, the only one of the four swing states where Democrats do not currently hold the secretary of state’s office. In fact, no Democrat has held the office in 20 years.
“Nothing else matters at this point if we don’t get the secretary of state’s office right in Georgia,” Reynolds said. “My opponent is a MAGA extremist who has been endorsed by Donald Trump, and we know that with that endorsement comes a fidelity to everything that he wants done.”
Trump has already shown why these races are so important by continuing to meddle in them and undermine faith in the electoral process.
The Department of Justice has sued to obtain full voter rolls, including sensitive personal information, from each state in order to allow the Department of Homeland Security to match the rolls with a noncitizen database — a process that routinely turns up false positives and ends up kicking rightful citizens off the voter rolls.
“Nothing else matters at this point if we don’t get the secretary of state’s office right in Georgia.”
– Judge Penny Brown Reynolds, Democratic candidate for Georgia secretary of state
The DOJ has also sent letters to municipalities in Michigan questioning the maintenance of the state’s voter rolls and stating it would send election monitors for the Aug. 4 primaries. Trump also singled out Michigan in a primetime address to the nation where he repeated long-discredited claims of fraud in 2020 related to improperly filled-out voter registrations.
The stakes are even higher in Arizona and Georgia, where Trump has pursued criminal investigations into his false claims about the 2020 election. These investigations led to an FBI raid on Fulton County election offices in Georgia where federal agents seized election materials from the 2020 election. Arizona Republicans, meanwhile, provided similar materials from Maricopa County to the Department of Justice under a grand jury subpoena.
“They have been so aggressive right now, in the lead-up to 2026,” Gilchrist said. “That’s going to be even more aggressive in 2027 ahead of the 2028 presidential election.”

REBECCA NOBLE via Getty Images
That is why the Democratic nominees and incumbents believe that electing their GOP opponents poses a threat to the integrity of future elections.
In Arizona, Fontes’ challenger, Kolodin, who won his primary with the backing of Turning Point USA, previously worked with former Trump lawyer Sidney Powell in 2020 and represented Lake when she challenged her 2022 loss to Gov. Katie Hobbs, a Democrat, with unproven claims of fraud. Kolodin was sanctioned by the State Bar of Arizona for bringing meritless cases and filing lawsuits primarily for the purposes of harassment.
“The danger is foundational,” Fontes said about electing Kolodin. “You’ve got here an individual who has outrageous viewpoints across the board.”
Aguilar faces the same kind of election denier in his rematch with Marchant in Nevada. Back in 2022, in a less-favorable electoral climate, Aguilar beat Marchant by a slim 23,000-vote margin.
Now, Marchant is back with the same belief that most of Nevada’s recent elections have been fraudulent and with radical plans to upend the state’s voting system. Among his proposals? Unregistering every voter in the state and forcing them to re-register while using biometric data, including their heartbeat, to confirm their identities.
“Nevada runs some of the safest, most secure and most accessible elections in the country,” Aguilar said. “He will rip this all apart to do what he’s publicly stated in the past that he would deliver the results to President Trump.”
Politics
Trump Says US Will Control Greenland: ‘Make That Bet’
Weeks after US President Donald Trump renewed his demand that the United States get control over Greenland, he assured a right-wing TV host that it’s a safe bet it will happen.
“You’re also still looking at Greenland,” Real America’s Voice host Steve Gruber asked Trump by phone on Friday. “I made a prediction on this program that before you left office, that Greenland would be under our operational control. It’s still incredibly important to defending the Western hemisphere, isn’t it?”
“Yeah, you’ll be right,” Trump answered. “No, they wanna do something very important. Greenland’s important, you know, from our standpoint. Not from their standpoint. But from our standpoint. Uh, yeah, you should make that bet, actually.”
Trump has long floated taking control of Greenland, a semi-autonomous territory of Denmark, asserting that the US needs it for strategic defense purposes. Though at one point he said he wouldn’t rule out using force to take Greenland, he later said he wouldn’t use force.
The president had been relatively quiet about his designs on Greenland over the past few months, but re-upped the topic at the NATO summit last month, saying that Greenland “should be controlled by the United States, not by Denmark.”
Politics
What Should I Watch Next On Netflix July 2026? Try Asura
What is it about choosing a new TV show that feels so torturous?
Too much buzz paradoxically puts me off a series – “if everyone’s telling you that you must watch something, part of your brain sort of goes ‘actually maybe I won’t,’” consultant psychiatrist Dr Mosun told HuffPost UK previously.
But I’m not exactly delighted with my habit of rewatching the same five programmes, either.
Which is why, for me, finding an underrated gem offers the best of both worlds.
And according to critics, Netflix series Asura is a particularly glittering example.
Released in 2025, the seven-episode’s synopsis reads: “In 1979 Tokyo, four distinct sisters uncover their ageing father’s affair, causing their happy facades and bottled-up emotions to slowly unravel”.
Food is a force of nature in the show. Ever-present and frequently sumptous, it stands in for all kinds of moods, dynamics, hurts, and triumphs.
Each of Asura’s “strikingly beautiful” hour-long episodes contains “snappy jokes, deep intimacy, physical wrestling, meal-planning and petty but profound complaints about family dynamics,” critics say.
It’s directed by Palme d’Or-winning Hirokazu Kore-eda, and is an adaptation of a novel by Kuniko Mukôda.

Asura has earned a perfect 100% Tomatometer critic score on review aggregation site Rotten Tomatoes, and 94% from its audience-generated Popcornmeter.
The Guardian said the series could be “the best drama [Netflix] has put out in years,” asking, “how has it gone almost unnoticed?”.
The New York Times, meanwhile, called it the “full package: a detailed, human-scale domestic drama with plenty to say, fascinating characters to say it and the stylishness to make it sing.
“The downside is that other shows feel paltry and thin in comparison. The upside is everything else.”
For their part, Slate called Asura “the best new show of 2025,” describing it as a “compassionate yet incisive dissection of family, betrayal, and 1970s Japan”.
One note, though: Guardian writer Rebecca Nicholson said that for those who don’t speak Japanese, the show “urges a second watch, to catch those delicate moments you may have missed when reading the subtitles”.
A rewatch of one of the highest-rated releases on Netflix? Oh noooo…
All seven episodes of Asura are available on Netflix.
Politics
Why Mountain Holidays Beat Beach Holidays When Travelling With Kids
They say the definition of madness is doing the same thing over and over and expecting a different result.
And that’s me when it comes to family holidays. I keep booking beach breaks, hoping for a relaxed and magical time away – and then overstimulation, heat and sugar come into play and suddenly we’re all arguing.
But, I may have found the secret to a less stressful family holiday. I won’t gatekeep: it’s one without a beach.
When you think of a ‘holiday’ – especially an Italian summer holiday – your mind probably conjures up visions of sparkling sea and soft white sand.
But this year, we decided to do something different and headed to Italy’s South Tyrol instead, swapping sandy shores for mountain views.
And honestly? Not having to worry about losing my kids on a packed beach or having them cry because they’ve got grit in their eyes immediately made the trip way more enjoyable.

We didn’t miss the beach at all
We headed to The Dolomites, a mountainous region in northeastern Italy, and stayed in two different locations during our six-day trip.
The first place we ventured to was Hotel Feldhof in Naturno, a village about 40km from Bolzano airport with stunning mountain views.
Part of the Dolce Vita Hotels brand, Hotel Feldhof is their family and wellness hotel, with facilities like a family spa, 80-metre indoor slide and kids club, but plenty of touches for the grown-ups too like a rooftop infinity pool, fitness classes and spa treatments.
The hotel has 10 different pools, so I can honestly say we didn’t miss the beach at all. My four-year-old spent every waking moment he could in the pools (or, racing down slides), and the baby and toddler pool was perfect for my one-year-old to splash about in safely.
There’s a kids club with childcare for those aged three and over, and the additional playroom with a bouldering wall, playhouses and soft-play area is open all day for guests to use. If we ever managed to peel ourselves from the pools, you could usually find us there instead.

Family-friendly without compromising on aesthetics or service
The facilities at Hotel Feldhof were seriously impressive and absolutely perfect for a family holiday, but I liked that everything was still stylish and chic. Sometimes you can go away with kids and feel like everything is geared up for them, from pool foam parties to mascots singing the Macarena.
Here, there was none of that – it was a luxurious, Instagrammable setting that understood adults’ needs as well as children’s, and it was family-friendly without compromising on aesthetics or service.
When you stay at one of the Dolce Vita hotels, your booking gives you access to any of the other hotels in the group, meaning you can use their facilities – like pools, restaurants and spas – too. During our trip we walked to the five-star Lindenhof resort nearby (which is equally as gorgeous, but feels less geared up for families with younger children).
I did have the chance to try out their spa treatments though, one of which involved a very relaxing facial which sent me to sleep.
We also ventured out into Naturno and took a ride up into the mountains on a cable car. It’s a definite 10/10 for views and for the chilled beer at the mountainside pub, but be warned if you’re travelling with little ones – there are some very steep inclines and if you’re pushing a pushchair up to the viewing platform you will get sweaty (but the reward of a cold beer makes up for it).

I didn’t get to spend as much time in the bar as I’d have liked, but they did serve an excellent Aperol Spritz
On day four of our trip we made our way up to Soprabolzano, a village 1,200 metres above sea level and up some pretty steep roads, where we checked into Parkhotel Holzner, a family run Alpine Art Nouveau hotel with more than 100 years of history and an array of impressive awards.
We stayed in one of the hotel’s family suites which had two bedrooms, light and bright modern wooden decor, and seriously stunning views. Plus, slightly cooler mountain air, which was welcome during Europe’s sweltering heatwave.
Parkhotel Holzner has a gorgeous, authentic charm about it, and I loved how the house and grounds still had lots of original features, from the furniture to the light fittings.
My favourite place was the panoramic terrace where we ate all our meals, and The Green Parlour Bar, a charming wood-panelled space with Art Nouveau touches. Sadly, kids and stylish bars don’t really mix so I didn’t get to spend as much time in there as I’d have liked, but I can confirm they make an excellent Aperol Spritz.
During our stay here we (again) spent a lot of time in the pool, and also made use of the kids club, the on-site playground and took a cable car trip down to Bolzano, which is just a 15-minute journey.
The hotel had a really lovely, family feel to it and I loved all the little touches like the wicker baskets they provided to put your pool towels and robes into. Obviously ours was immediately filled with pool toys, balls and snacks – but the thought was appreciated.

How do you get there?
When you think of mountain escapes you might be put off by visions of a long, arduous journey to get there – especially with young kids in tow – but actually, it was really easy.
We flew from London Gatwick to Bolzano with SkyAlps. The route is fairly new but it makes getting to South Tyrol much simpler. The flight time is under two hours, you get snacks on board and Bolzano airport is tiny so the security queues are minimal.
We had private transfers arranged to get us from the airport to our hotel, and then back to the airport for our return.
The roads are quite steep (being in the mountains and all) so you could hire a car, but I preferred having a local who knows the roads taking us.
The drive to Hotel Feldhof was about an hour from Bolzano airport, and Parkhotel Holzner was around 30 minutes – it would have been even quicker by cable car, but I’m not sure you’d want to lug your suitcases on one…
What’s the food like?
Both hotels had excellent food offerings, but because South Tyrolean cuisine is predominantly Alpine-Austrian, there were lots of traditional dishes that you wouldn’t typically expect when booking an Italian holiday. Basically, more game meats and fewer pizzas!
This didn’t pose a problem for my husband or I, but even though both hotels had children’s menus, there wasn’t always a great deal that my two would eat. Now that we’re home, I think I need to up my game (sorry) and work on refining their palettes before the next trip. I can confirm though that both hotels had ice cream for dessert, so the kids seemed pretty satisfied.

Hotel Feldhof offers a 3/4 board dining plan including a breakfast buffet, complete with Prosecco (necessary when parenting abroad!), lunchtime snacks and an eight-course gourmet evening menu.
At Parkhotel Holzner there’s 1908, a Michelin star restaurant on site, although we didn’t try it as introducing the kids to venison was a challenge enough! We did however give the half-board dining experience a whirl, featuring excellent breakfast buffets (also with Prosecco, in case you were wondering) and dinner, which included a multi-course gourmet menu with a separate ‘little gourmets’ menu for kids.
How much does it cost?
If you fancy booking a trip for yourself, here’s the lowdown:
- Hotel Feldhof: from €177 per person per night, (approx. £152) and includes 3/4 board – breakfast included, afternoon buffet and dinner.
- Parkhotel Holzner: from €300 per room, per night, based on two people sharing with half-board.
Mountain holidays might be my new favourite break
This region of Italy had never really been on my radar before, but I can wholeheartedly say mountain holidays might be my new favourite destination.
No paying for sunbeds, no struggling to find a toilet, no carrying your kids miles across sand dunes because their legs are tired… just delicious food and drink, fresh air, activities galore, thermal waters and stunning views.
What’s not to love? South Tyrol, you have my heart.
Charlie Bond visited as part of a press trip.
Politics
Binge-Watching TV Linked To Brain Differences Associated With Dementia
If you’re a fan of a nightly binge-watch session on the sofa (hey, who isn’t?), it might be worth rethinking exactly how much time you spend passively gazing at the TV.
A recent study found people who watched TV ‘very often’ during midlife showed smaller volumes in brain regions linked to memory and areas of damage in the brain’s white matter that are associated with ageing, cognitive decline and even dementia.
Senior author David Raichlen, professor of biological sciences and anthropology at USC Dornsife, said: “For years we’ve focused on how much people sit. Our findings suggest we should also pay attention to what they’re doing while they’re sitting.”
The researchers suggested the results aren’t just because of people sitting still on the sofa for ages, as other types of sedentary activities (like sitting to work) did not have the same associations.
What did the study involve?
They looked at data from 1,700 adults, with an average age of 53, who had enrolled in the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study between 1987 and 1989.
Participants were asked to report how often – on a scale ranging from “never” to “very often” – they watched TV during their leisure time. They were also asked how much of their workday they spent sitting.
After more than 20 years, participants had brain MRI scans. Compared with those who reported “never” or “seldom” watching TV, those who watched TV “very often” showed widespread structural differences across the brain.
In this group, the researchers found smaller volumes in brain areas that were associated with early signs of Alzheimer’s disease.
They also identified indicators of blood vessel disease associated with cognitive decline and dementia, as well as smaller occipital and frontal lobes, regions associated with vision and movement.
Differences persisted even when the researchers considered factors such as physical activity, diabetes, body mass index (BMI), smoking, and how much alcohol participants consumed.
Sitting didn’t seem to be the problem, passively watching TV did
The study found those who reported high amounts of sitting at work had larger frontal and occipital lobes, as well as reduced white matter hyperintensity volumes.
Researchers noted this indicated better brain health in work-sitters than among TV-sitters. This could be due to the intellectually stimulating nature of their sit-down jobs, they hypothesised.
Their not alone in their thoughts. Dr Soma Sengupta, a neurologist at Tufts Medical Centre, suggested that unlike reading, learning a new skill, or working, watching TV “often requires little active mental engagement”.
She told Prevention: “Over many years, less cognitive stimulation could contribute to less ‘exercise’ for brain networks involved in planning, memory and attention.”
When the MRI scans were separated by sex, researchers found that men were most impacted – most of the changes to the brain, both from TV watching and occupational sitting, were seen in this group.
The study authors suggested that, in future, MRIs should be taken at the start and end of the study so they can monitor changes over time.
They also suggested a different approach to health guidance around sedentary activities might be needed, focusing on reducing TV-watching.
Natan Feter, postdoctoral scholar in the Human and Evolutionary Biology program at USC Dornsife, added: “We frequently encourage the public not to spend too much time sitting down, but experts may want to expand that recommendation to encompass the activities done while sitting, since those seems to have distinct impacts on brain health.”
How to protect brain health as you age
One study published in the American Academy of Neurology found that a decline in thinking skills and memory can be staved off by regularly reading and writing.
Drinking less, exercising more, eating a balanced diet, and avoiding smoking can benefit brain health and lower your risk of dementia, too.
In 2018, a 44-year-long study published in the journal Nature showed a link between cardiovascular fitness, as measured by a cycling test, and an 88% lower incidence of dementia among women.
Even walking regularly can benefit your brain. A 2022 paper found that just 3,800 steps a day may lower your likelihood of developing dementia by 25%, with increasing benefits up to 9,800 steps.
Politics
Jason Arday: the Forrest Gump of DEI?
The post Jason Arday: the Forrest Gump of DEI? appeared first on spiked.
-
Sports6 days agoCommonwealth Games boxing: Jadumani Singh seals dominant 5-0 win over Pakistan’s Sumama Rehman to enter quarter-finals | Commonwealth Games News
-
Business3 days agoWhy Trees Belong on the Risk Register
-
Fashion2 days agoWeekend Open Thread: Wit & Wisdom
-
Tech6 days agoIntel is reversing course and bringing hyper-threading back to its server chips
-
Politics1 day agoMeta enters AI-training agreement with far-right ‘propaganda rag’ Newsmax
-
Politics6 days agoLuke Littler dismantles Gerwyn Price to retain title in Blackpool
-
Crypto World17 hours agoMicroStrategy Post-Earnings CLARITY Act Push Could Add New Catalyst for Its Stock
-
Politics5 days agoThe Part of the Electric Transition Nobody Wants to Discuss
-
Entertainment5 days ago‘Stargate’ Creator’s New Sci-Fi Series Returns for Season 3 Tomorrow
-
News Videos6 days agoBITCOIN JUST ENTERED THIS CRITICAL ZONE…
-
Business4 days agoMajor shareholder moves on Canyon
-
Politics7 days agoSpain sweeps the board at 2026 World Cup with individual awards
-
News Videos3 days agoBitcoin Enters the 3rd Stage of the Bear Market
-
Crypto World1 day agoXRP Ledger v3.3.0 brings five institutional features
-
Crypto World4 days agoKraken Enables Retail Access to Jersey Mike’s IPO via Tokenized Shares
-
Tech5 days agoNew macOS Sequoia & Sonoma security updates for older Macs
-
News Videos5 days agoClaude: Build Financial Dashboards in Minutes (2026)
-
Sports2 days agoSeema Kaliramna Wins Discus Throw Bronze, Takes India’s CWG Medals Tally To 17
-
Politics3 days agoLuke Littler’s dominance sparks GOAT debate
-
Business4 days agoJohnson & Johnson agrees to $5.5B settlement over talc cancer claims

You must be logged in to post a comment Login