In a newly released letter, Peter Mandelson told David Lammy he would “never regret” making him ambassador to the US. While this ended up being catastrophically incorrect, Mandelson did at least get it right when he predicted the role would be “the last thing I do in public life”.

Mandelson: Petering out

As you can see, Mandelson’s handwriting is somewhat difficult to decipher:

As far as we can tell, this is what Mandelson wrote (emphasis added):

Dear David,

As today (and all week) is polling day in Oxford and I am returning to London, I wanted to drop you a line, privately, about Washington.

Advertisement

Thankfully, the media speculation has gone away and I hope this was not too irritating to you. I just wanted you to know that if you were minded to appoint me I would make sure you never regret it.

They’re calling it the least true statement of all time.

The disgraced Epstein associate continued:

I fear that navigating Britain’s interests through the Trump administration will require super-human skills and luck and a massive team effort.

Was there a superhero whose special ability was being best friends with Jeffrey Epstein? If there was, no doubt they based him on Peter Mandelson.

Mandelson continued:

There is so much riding on it, on security and defence, on trade and economy and on EU relationships, not to mention China. If we all put our best minds and energy to it, I think we can pull it off but we have to be realistic.

Oh yes, we have to make “realistic” decisions – decisions like hiring a twice-disgraced politician to be our ambassador to the US, and expecting no controversy to result from that.

To be fair to old Peter, he did get this next bit spot on:

For me, it would be the last thing I do in public life.

If the police do their job, this could be the truest words ever spoken.

He finished:

it would be a huge honour to serve you and the government in this role. So if you are up for it, so am I.

Very best,

Peter

We think he wrote “huge honour”, but it would be more accurate if his squiggly handwriting actually reads “huge horror”.

Warning signs

As we reported on 8 February, Lammy claims he ‘warned’ Keir Starmer not to appoint Peter Mandelson:

That’s odd because here is David Lammy describing Peter Mandelson as a “man of considerable expertise” and the “right man” to be the US ambassador.

Looks like he is trying to save his own skin. https://t.co/V1vIlscNws pic.twitter.com/Ve8AoJLdMX

— Chris Rose (@ArchRose90) February 7, 2026

Advertisement

With far more letters set for release, we’ll soon find out if this story holds up.

Featured image via Anna Moneymayker (Getty Images) / WPA Pool (Getty Images)

By Willem Moore

Source link

The Trades Union Congress (TUC) and the Rail, Maritime and Transport (RMT) union have highlighted the creation of a “two-tier workforce” as Govia Thameslink Railway enters public ownership.

Govia Thameslink Railway is the UK’s largest train operator, encompassing Southern, Thameslink, Great Northern and Gatwick Express.

Labour has begun the public ownership process as part of its manifesto commitment to nationalise the majority of train companies after their contracts expire.

The Department for Transport Operator Limited already manages West Midlands Trains, Greater Anglia, c2c, South Western, Northern, TransPennine Express, Southeastern and LNER under the same commitment. Chiltern Railways and Great Western Railways will follow in September and December, respectively.

Govia Thameslink Railway nationalised on 31 May

Transport secretary, Heidi Alexander, said:

Bringing Britain’s largest train operator into public ownership is a defining moment in our reform of the railway. It gives us an opportunity to tackle the bread and butter issues people want, like driving down cancellations and improving the frequency of services to Gatwick Airport.

Those “bread and butter issues” are a real grab-bag, from the genuinely important to the painfully mundane. Nevertheless, Labour crammed the whole lot into its press release.

The plans include:

• Doubling services for Gatwick Express services and increasing Saturday and Monday morning trains from December onwards. They’ll also additional Great Northern services around the same time.
• Continuing Govia Thameslink Railway’s recruitment of 75 more drives between Thameslink and Great Northern, and 40 drivers at Southern and Gatwick Express this year.
• Training 110 ‘Travel Safe Officers’ to “support revenue protection” (i.e. check more tickets) and increase security.
• Upgrading secondary signalling between Farringdon and Blackfriars. The government expects this to prevent as many as 1,000 cancellations per year.
• Providing more online payment options and a customer support channel on WhatsApp.
• Cleaning the graffiti in the Thameslink train toilets and resurfacing the toilet interiors. (Did we really need government intervention for that one?)

‘Two-tier workforce’ risk

Whilst at least half of those plans sound very worthy, the unions have been less than enamoured with one aspect of the endeavour.

TUC general secretary, Paul Nowak, explained:

This could be one of the great success stories of the Labour government.

But it is undermining its own efforts to deliver nationalised rail by leaving contracts in the hands of third-party providers who line their own pockets at the expense of the workforce and passengers.

We need a fully integrated national rail service which works for passengers and the rail workforce.

That means tackling outsourcing in the sector and ensuring all rail workers enjoy decent terms and conditions.

Govia Thameslink Railway contracts its cleaning services to private provider, Churchill. TUC analysis highlighted that Churchill makes £2.53 million gross profit annually from this tender alone. That’s the equivalent of 160,000 additional hours of cleaning or 83 extra cleaners.

This outsourcing diverts money from the public, workers and services into the pockets of private shareholders. The unions are urging that the cleaning services should instead be brought in-house.

Eddie Dempsey, general secretary of the RMT, explained:

We want to see all our members on the railway receive the same benefits of public ownership and this includes outsourced workers.

The Labour government needs to follow through on its commitment to undertake a mass wave of insourcing.

Nationalisation — in spirit or in name?

It’s not like Labour’s nationalisation doesn’t have form for continuing to enrich private interests, either.

The Canary previously reported that energy secretary Ed Milliband handed lucrative contracts to London-based firms, Deloitte and Baringa Partners. Now, the two companies will handle day-to-day operations of GB Energy, nominally Labour’s flagship publicly-owned energy corporation.

The National revealed that these contracts promise the firms up to £10 million each to be responsible for “organisational set up support”, “operational design and delivery”, market strategy and “technical support”.

Likewise, GB Energy was also supposed to create 1,000 jobs, mostly in the north of England. However, GB Energy only employes 30 staff on permanent contracts. The rest are on temporary or contingent, i.e. far less secure, government-sponsored contracts.

Don’t get us wrong, the Canary advocates for the nationalisation of public services. However, that process needs to be more than public ownership in name only. This, in turn, means spending public money on the public good, not further enriching private shareholders.

As the unions pointed out, Labour isn’t set to achieve that aim with Govia Thameslink Railway — and if its performance with GB Energy is anything to go by, that fact is a feature, not a bug.

Featured image via Charlotte Coney/ Getty Images

By Alex/Rose Cocker

Source link

A new poll has shown Keir Starmer’s Labour Party is rapidly losing the support of trade unionists. And it seems to be the billionaire-backed Thatcherites and ex-Tories of Reform who are making the most of Labour’s collapse.

Trade unionists overwhelmingly say ‘Labour has lost touch’

Right-wing pollster JL Partners, whose co-founders have deep roots in the Conservative Party, asked 1,002 trade union members about political parties and leaders. And although 48% of the members who’d voted in the 2024 general election said they’d opted for Labour, only 28% said they would do the same today.

Reform, meanwhile, went up from 16% in 2024 to 28% now, despite the party wanting to take a hammer to workers’ rights.

The other winner in the poll was the Green Party, going up from 5% to 12%.

Inside the three biggest unions, which continue to affiliate to Starmer’s Labour:

• Unison members moved from 50% supporting Labour in 2024 to just 28% doing so now. Reform rose from 15% to 25%, and the Greens from 8% to 16%.
• Unite members went from 47% for Labour to 30%. Reform jumped from 20% to 36%, and the Greens only had a slight rise from 3% to 8%.
• GMB members’ backing for Labour dropped from 43% to 22%, with Reform going from 20% to 31% and the Greens only going from 5% to 9%. 50% of GMB members wanted disaffiliation from Labour.

Among the members of these three unions, there seemed to be significant openness particularly inside Unite and the GMB to backing Reform. Having to choose among major parties, they would both mostly opt to affiliate with Reform. That matters for Labour, because both unions donate massive amounts to the party.

If Unison members had to choose to affiliate to any major party, however, they would choose the Green Party (23%) over Labour (22%) and Reform (17%). The University and College Union (UCU) would do the same, with 30% opting for the Greens, 22% for Labour, and only 9% for Reform.

One thing is overwhelmingly clear from the poll, though. The vast majority of members in most unions agree that:

The Labour Party has lost touch with working people

Among all respondents, 62% agreed with that statement, and only 30% disagreed. 58%, meanwhile, believed Starmer needed to step down as prime minister.

Union members want Starmer out, but are unclear on what should follow

The Green Party under Zack Polanski has sought to position itself as the main left-wing challenger to Labour’s domination in the trade union movement, partly by calling Labour out for watering down its workers’ rights package. But the JL Partners poll suggests the Greens need to do a lot more work to convince trade unionists.

The poll respondents firmly believed Reform “represents working people” better than the Greens. Even among sympathetic unions, the Greens trailed Reform by at least 10%. The highest Green score came from the National Union of Rail, Maritime and Transport Workers (RMT), whose members gave Greens 20% and Reform 33%.

The dodgy billionaire money behind Reform is tough to beat. But the Greens and other left-wingers looking to convince trade unionists also need to be clear about why they are much better on workers’ rights than Reform. Trade unionists have already called on Greens, for example, to commit to opposing austerity cuts.

What is obvious, meanwhile, is that trade unionists oppose Keir Starmer and the direction his gang has taken the Labour Party in. They agree on how disastrous his government has been, and have an overwhelmingly negative view of him. What they don’t have is a strong positive view of any other party leader.

In short, this poll is terrible news for Starmer’s Labour. But it also serves as a warning for the left. Because unless we get our act together, Reform has more than enough money to keep benefiting from Labour’s collapse.

Featured image via Getty/Gareth Fuller

By Ed Sykes

Source link

US Democratic Party Leader Chuck Schumer joined far-right Israeli Minister Bezalel Smotrich and other far-right Israeli lawmakers and American politicians in the annual Israel Day Parade in New York City over the weekend.

Smotrich, who is wanted by the International Criminal Court,  is openly genocidal and has repeatedly called for Israel to completely ethnically cleanse all 1.8 million people from Gaza, so it can ‘be settled’. Smotrich also called to annex the entirety of the West Bank during a speech at a Jerusalem Day rally last month.

Chuck Schumer is marching in NYC alongside a genocidal maniac wanted for war crimes by the International Criminal Court. https://t.co/AHlUhOWfXQ

— Mohammad Alsaafin (@malsaafin) May 31, 2026

A “record-size” delegation of the Knesset, the Israeli parliament, attended the parade, Haaretz reported.

They have to ethnically cleanse us and steal our land so multi millionaire Chuck Schumer can have a just-in-case fascist state to flee to? https://t.co/XbeD00bZz7

— Rania Khalek (@RaniaKhalek) June 1, 2026

American-Lebanese journalist Rania Khalek posted a speech by Schumer at the parade, in which Schumer was lauding Israel as a state standing for the Jewish people.

That’s the Israel that Schumer is lauding — one that ethnically cleanses Palestinians and Lebanese people alike.

Israel and Isaac Accords

Smotrich is reportedly also travelling to Washington to meet with leaders of Latin American countries to expand the Isaac Accords.

Smotrich traveled to Washington in order to meet with leaders of Latin American nations and expand the Isaac Accords, the new diplomatic-economic initiative with Latin American countries, Walla reported.https://t.co/i7EX8VK4uO

— The Jerusalem Post (@Jerusalem_Post) May 31, 2026

The Isaac Accords, which started last year and are funded by money from the Genesis Prize that Argentina’s Milei received in Jerusalem. They are meant to increase ties between Israel, Uruguay, Panama, and Costa Rica.

The Jerusalem Post reported that:

The minister is scheduled to return to Israel as early as Wednesday, after conducting an intensive marathon of meetings in the United States with key Latin American figures.

So there’s Schumer parading with Smotrich, who’s busy making business deals while calling for genocide. The bi-partisan American dream.

Featured image via Getty/Erik Marmour

By The Canary

Source link

Source link

The Refugee and Migrant Children’s Consortium (RMCC) has spoken out against government plans to access asylum seekers’ age using AI.

On Friday 29 May, the Home Office announced plans to use AI in cases when an asylum seekers’ age is in dispute. However, the RMCC warned that the scheme could lead to yet more wrongful detentions of vulnerable children in adult facilities.

The news follows April’s revelations from the independent Humans for Rights Network, which exposed the fact that the Home Office routinely detains so-called “age-disputed children” as adults. Of the 76 age-disputed detainees at the time, 26 had been — or were in the process of being — reassessed as children by Social Services.

Just get an AI to do it…

Most of the unaccompanied children who brave the journey to the UK in search of asylum are 16-17 years old. The Home Office’s own data shows that social workers are more than twice as likely to confirm that these individuals are minors compared to assessments carried out by immigration officers.

Ultimately, over two-thirds of the age-disputed individuals are confirmed to be their stated age. Nevertheless, Labour choose to focus on the ‘threat’ of the perceived adult migrants.

Alex Norris, the minister for border security and asylum, argued that:

For too long, adult migrants making false age claims have exploited the system and diverted vital support away from children at risk.

That is why we are rolling out AI technology to put a stop to this, ensuring those who game the system are identified, detained and removed without delay, and those who deserve support and protection are given it.

That now-familiar appeal to AI is part of Labour’s massive push to use the technology across vast swathes of public life – including policing and the court system.

Private sector enrichment

Of course, that AI-push has also seen massive amounts of public money pad the pockets of tech-sector CEOs. One company alone – genocide-linked Palantir – currently holds over £500m in public contracts, from the NHS to law enforcement.

The government’s machine-learning obsession was championed by Tony Blair and his eponymous think-tank, which just happened to take a £250m donation from AI-specialist CEO Larry Ellison.

With regard to refugee age verification, the Home Office handed a 3-year, £322,000 contract to Akhter Computers Ltd for testing and development.

But what exactly is the AI technology that Labour is aiming to deploy in this particular case? Friday’s Home Office announcement explained that:

Facial Age Estimation (FAE) uses machine learning technology to estimate an individual’s age within seconds by analysing a facial photograph without further information about the individual. […]

FAE is not the same as facial recognition technology. While both use artificial intelligence, they serve different purposes and use different algorithms. Facial recognition compares an image against a database to identify a person. FAE does not identify individuals and does not search any databases. It only estimates an age from an image.

The Home Office isn’t using FAE at the present moment in time. However, the department plans to spend the remainder of the year testing the technology ahead of a rollout in 2027.

‘Problems with bias and inaccuracy’

However, the plans have met with strong opposition from organisations representing young refugees. Kamena Dorling, co-chair of the RMCC, stated that:

The government’s proposals are deeply concerning. AI cannot account for the factors that can significantly affect a young person’s appearance after fleeing conflict and persecution and undertaking dangerous journeys, including trauma, malnutrition, and exhaustion.

Existing evidence also shows that AI faces the same problems with bias and inaccuracy as human decision-making, with similar patterns of errors.

Advertisement

Whilst it may seem intensely obvious, the fact that children fleeing active warzones might look older than their years apparently escaped Labour’s notice.

Likewise, as Dorling said, AI has a tendency to replicate human errors, rather than eliminating them. Meanwhile, it obscures those errors in a cloak of cold, algorithmically-determined ‘fairness’.

‘A false sense of certainty’

Senior policy analyst and consortium member Kama Petruczenko, of the Refugee Council, said:

The government’s own figures already show that hundreds of children are being wrongly treated as adults following flawed visual assessments at the border, with devastating consequences for their safety and wellbeing.

AI and facial age estimation technology are not a simple or risk-free answer to these longstanding problems. Poor image quality and bias in datasets can also affect accuracy.

Advertisement

There is a real danger that this technology creates a false sense of certainty in decisions that are already extremely difficult to get right. If flawed assessments are simply automated, more children could end up wrongly placed in adult accommodation, detention centres or even prisons.

The government has already shown an awareness of these biases. However, beyond vague statements about trying to minimise errors, it simply doesn’t care. The Home Office announcement stated that:

There is evidence in testing data that FAE performance can vary depending on ethnicity, skin tone, gender, place of birth and quality of input image. NIST [The National Institute of Standards and Technology] found that error rates were almost always higher for female faces, although it didn’t find out why as testing was purely on performance rather than how algorithms work.

Vendors take bias seriously and commercial FAE technology is trained to be representative of the broadest possible demographic range of potential users.

‘The technology is racist and sexist, but we’re sure the people selling it to us are doing their best’. Well that’s all fine then, please carry on.

The RMCC will release its full report, titled ‘Benchmarks and Borders: the use of facial age estimation to assess the age of unaccompanied young people seeking asylum’, in June this year. If the current state of Labour’s AI policy is anything to go by, the consortium will have no shortage of criticisms to fill its pages.

Featured image via Leon Neal / Getty Images

By Alex/Rose Cocker

Source link

The director of Backrooms has revealed he’s already got ideas for more films set within the film’s bizarre universe.

Released last week, Kane Parson’s critically-acclaimed new horror movie centres around the lonely owner of a struggling furniture shop, who stumbles upon an unsettling other dimension through the wall of his store’s basement.

As he progresses further into the seemingly limitless space, he becomes increasingly obsessed with what he discovers and how it relates to the world outside.

During a new interview with Variety published on Backrooms’ release date, its director teased: “Without a doubt, Backrooms has always been planned to be more of a series that goes outside the confines of this film.

Advertisement

“If anything, I would say this is a bit of a foot in the door that would lead to more of a progression towards the true root of the narrative, which has been set up online for years. But a version that maintains accessibility and lets this be the way in.”

He continued: “For people who are into it, I’ve got a contract, and I got a hold at my end, and that means I am definitely not done with Backrooms.

“I’ve got very specific things that I’m working on, things are in the works right now that I am eager to be able to talk about, but, currently, it’s still in a secret mystery world.”

Backrooms’ origin story is a bit of an interesting one in itself.

Advertisement

The idea stems from a 4chan post from back in 2019 showing an environment similar to the one seen in the Backrooms movie, which then became its own “creepypasta” (an online term for a widely-shared horror story that gains notoriety and viral fame by being copied and pasted around various corners of the internet) when someone came up with text to accompany it.

While Backrooms’ original “creepypasta” was shared anonymously, Kane Parsons began a YouTube series based on the idea in 2022, the success of which led to his new film.

He added to Variety that he has no intention of “leaving YouTube behind” now he’s crossed over into feature-length filmmaking.

“I immensely enjoy the work I’ve done there, and I feel creatively fulfilled by it in a way that’s proportional to what I’ve done with this film,” he insisted. “I personally think there’s merits, because there’s a lot of projects that I just could never do outside of YouTube, or outside of a more free-form internet multimedia container.

Advertisement

“So I wouldn’t limit myself just to one spot, but I do think it’s a way of saying that I’ve got a bit of a good thing going right now that I want to utilise with the energy and positivity around this film.”

Backrooms is in cinemas now.

Source link

The Home Office has banned left-wing commentator and TV host, Cenk Uygur, from entering the UK, on Israel’s behalf. He is a vocal critic of pro-Israel influence over Western governments. Cenk Uygur has highlighted the irony of the UK ban over X. He said:

if I had said that the Israeli government controls the British government so thoroughly that they’ll ban someone from coming to the UK just for criticizing Israel, they would have said that was an antisemitic statement.

The commentator noted that he was banned not for any views or opinions he’s expressed about the UK.

Uygur argued that “Israel controls the American government,” largely because the pro-Israel lobby in the US channels significant financial support to members of Congress. He presented this as the main issue for Starmer’s government. While this is an overly simplistic and debatable political argument, it is not inherently a religious one. Nevertheless, some pro-Israel voices in the UK claim otherwise.

The UK banning Cenk Uygur for criticising Israel’s genocide in Gaza and US support isn’t just an attack on free speech, either. It also carries an antisemitic implication. This implication falsely equates criticism of genocidal war criminals with hatred of a whole religious group.

The British government is saying they're banning me because I am "a serious risk to the public order" due to my criticism of Israel.

They say that my charge that Israel controls the American government through donations to 94% of Congress, while factual, is antisemitic…

— Cenk Uygur (@cenkuygur) May 31, 2026

Cenk Uygur had previously called for the US to assert independence from pro-Israel interests during an appearance on Piers Morgan‘s talk show. After the UK decided to ban Cenk Uygur, Morgan has defended his guest, emphasising that he was making political rather than religious points:

She is a disgusting bigot who spews constant vile hatred against Muslims for being Muslim. Where has Cenk Uygur ever said anything hateful and bigoted against Jews for being Jewish? https://t.co/4TBnhNL9La

— Piers Morgan (@piersmorgan) June 1, 2026

Green Party leader Zack Polanski, has also called out the government’s cynical move. The Jewish politician lamented how the Labour government was:

doing everything possible to silence criticism of the Israeli government.

He called the ban of both Cenk Uygur and fellow Israel critic Hasan Piker “a really grim decision”:

This is a really grim decision alongside Cenk.

People often talk about dangerous road we'd go down under a Reform government – this is another clear warning we're down there already.

Advertisement

A Labour government doing everything possible to silence criticism of the Israeli Government. https://t.co/XS8GKEFJMe

— Zack Polanski (@ZackPolanski) June 1, 2026

It’s one thing for a government to challenge people spreading hatred of entire religious or ethnic communities. It’s another entirely when a government decides to limit political debate on behalf of a country currently committing genocide. And that’s exactly what has just happened.

Featured image via the Young turks / YouTube 

By Ed Sykes

Source link

!function(n){if(!window.cnx){window.cnx={},window.cnx.cmd=[];var t=n.createElement(‘iframe’);t.display=’none’,t.onload=function(){var n=t.contentWindow.document,c=n.createElement(‘script’);c.src=”//cd.connatix.com/connatix.player.js”,c.setAttribute(‘async’,’1′),c.setAttribute(‘type’,’text/javascript’),n.body.appendChild(c)},n.head.appendChild(t)}}(document);(new Image()).src=”https://capi.connatix.com/tr/si?token=19654b65-409c-4b38-90db-80cbdea02cf4″;cnx.cmd.push(function(){cnx({“playerId”:”19654b65-409c-4b38-90db-80cbdea02cf4″,”mediaId”:”573ffb5a-4e35-48ea-8bef-be1498f04ac9″}).render(“6a1d92e0e4b0ba317300e95b”);});

Source link

Source link