Connect with us
DAPA Banner

Politics

Susanna Reid destroys Starmer’s pathetic excuses around Mandelson

Published

on

Starmer Susanna Reid

Starmer Susanna Reid

On Good Morning Britain, Susanna Reid tore apart the weak excuses put out by UK PM Keir Starmer over the ongoing Peter Mandelson scandal.

Susanna Reid: on it

This followed the PM’s latest round of pathetic denials he had any knowledge of disgraced Peter Mandelson failing to pass security vetting before he was appointed as ambassador to the US.

By setting out a clear timeline alongside Keir Starmer’s own past comments on ‘Petie’ Mandelson, Reid shows Starmer’s measly attempts to escape accountability simply do not stack up.

Moreover, this takedown of the UK Prime Minister underscores a serious issue in our democracy, where corrupting influences hold far too much sway in the corridors of power in Westminster. All the while, ordinary people are fed lie after lie and expected to swallow them.

Advertisement

Reid, like many across the country, appears to have had quite enough of Starmer’s nonsense.

Keir Starmer is a liar

It will hardly surprise many in the electorate to learn that their PM is a liar. Frankly, his career has been littered with lies as he navigated his way to the upper echelons of power. In fact, we only have to look to 2019 Labour under Corbyn to see that lying has quite literally been Starmer’s comfort zone.

Reid makes this reality unmistakably clear by laying out a timeline of what was known and when. That, in turn, will tighten the pressure on Keir Starmer as scrutiny intensifies ahead of the May 7 local elections. Once again, the PM has left himself little room to wriggle out of a political mess of his own making. A mess he will undoubtedly be made to pay for at the ballots in just over two weeks.

Susanna Reid’s takedown in full:

Advertisement

Susanna Reid: It feels like there are three different issues here.

One is the judgment of Sir Keir Starmer right at the beginning, appointing Lord Peter Mandelson. He had been given a due diligence report. And on that report, it said Peter Mandelson had numerous conflicts of interest and described him carrying reputational risk.

A week later. It is announced by Sir Keir Starmer that Peter Mandelson was going to be the ambassador to the States.

So right off the bat, who appoints someone that you have been warned is a reputational risk? Never mind the vetting. You had been given a report that he was a walking red flag. So that’s the first issue.

The second issue is then he goes through this developed vetting. How competent are you as a prime minister that you then are not, as you say, either curious enough to know, well, what happened? Have we cleared him? Is it all safe? Keir Starmer in that position says, well, nobody told me.

Advertisement

As you say, it’s absolutely beggars belief that someone at number 10 wouldn’t have then said, is everything OK? Are we sure that we can now give him the green flag?

And then the third issue, it seems to me. is whether there is any lying going on, because that’s what Kemi Badenoch says. So, the Prime Minister has actually lied about this. As you mentioned, Gillian, there was a report a few months ago in The Independent. Downing Street knew Peter Mandelson had failed security vetting for the US ambassador role seven months ago because the reporter David Maddox at The Independent had… put concerns to Number 10, the then Director of Communications, Tim Allen, and said, I found out, or I’ve got a source that says MI6 had failed to clear Mandelson.

So David Maddox, the Independent, knew, Number 10 knew. So how can the Prime Minister say he didn’t know?

Finally, getting to the far more likely reality at the sinister heart of this sordid saga:

Advertisement

Gillian Keegan: Because he did not want to know.

It seems Starmer has even lost favour from pro-Israel voters, who he really should have in the bag:

Of course, he bloody well knew – as Susanna Reid pointed out

The optics can no longer be denied, as our own Skwawkbox wrote recently:

Advertisement

In any other walk of life both Starmer and Mandelson would be toast. But it seems running a protection racket for the predatory elite comes with very little in the way of consequences these days. This is a whole lot more than just a typical Westminster sleaze story, isn’t it? Starmer’s Labour is recycling the very worst of Blairite cronyism instead of breaking with it, once and for all.

adding:

This is the same Starmer who purged socialists to the glee of the pro-Israel parliamentary Labour party, ditched public ownership, and told poor and working-class voters their demands for wealth taxes and rent controls were unrealistic.

Yet protecting a mate with extremely fucking grubby Epstein ties? That was apparently non-negotiable for Keir Starmer. It can be so very easy to mistakenly assume this is down to Starmer’s incompetence and horrific lack of judgement. But this is elite impunity baked into his DNA.

Political advantage?

Others have gone further than Susanna Reid, questioning whether Mandelson’s ties to Epstein – and the shadow of the Epstein ‘kompromat’ files – may have played a role in his swift path to the White House. After all, it is becoming clearer by the day that a powerful and seedy few likely shape foreign affairs through damaging information they hold. Seen in that light, it doesn’t take a great leap to suggest that Starmer may have believed he could turn that cynical dynamic to his own advantage.

Here, Reid’s intervention powerfully hits the mark. It also exposes a wider truth: political leaders often prioritise their own advantage over decency, integrity in office, and, frankly, basic morality.

Advertisement

This has all come against the backdrop of our government’s ongoing complicity in the genocide on Gaza and Israel’s terrorism in the West Bank. Therefore, this palpable imbalance hardly surprises anyone.

For many across the UK, it will only change once Labour is out of government.

Featured image via the Canary

By Maddison Wheeldon

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Politics

Loneliness Not Be As Bad For Dementia Risk As We Thought

Published

on

Loneliness Not Be As Bad For Dementia Risk As We Thought

Experts think that having a close network of loved ones as we age might protect us from dementia risk.

But a new study has found that while loneliness can impair your memory as you age, that might not translate into full-blown dementia.

Published in Ageing and Mental Health, the research concluded that, “Loneliness is associated with lower initial memory performance in older adults but does not accelerate the decline in memory function over time”.

How does loneliness affect memory?

Advertisement

In this research, scientists looked at data from the Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe (SHARE) programme.

This involved 10,217 individuals over 65. They were asked to self-report their levels of loneliness and were given memory tests over a six-year period.

“Participants with high loneliness at baseline demonstrated significantly lower immediate and delayed recall scores than those with low or average loneliness,” the research reads.

But years into the study, lonelier people didn’t see the memory decline you’d expect with something like dementia. The changes appeared to be more short-term than that.

Advertisement

Lead study author Dr Luis Carlos Venegas-Sanabria said, “The finding that loneliness significantly impacted memory, but not the speed of decline in memory over time was a surprising outcome.

“It suggests that loneliness may play a more prominent role in the initial state of memory than in its progressive decline.”

Calling the results of previous studies about dementia risk and loneliness “inconsistent,” the study said its results “could reinforce the idea that loneliness cannot necessarily be considered a risk factor for dementia”.

Loneliness is a growing problem

Advertisement

The researchers say that loneliness is a growing problem, affecting anywhere from 14-16% of older adults.

And while their study suggests it might not necessarily be a dementia risk, they add that it “underscores the importance of addressing loneliness as a significant factor in the context of cognitive performance in older adults”.

Though in this study, it didn’t appear to lead to longer-term decline, loneliness still affected the cognitive abilities of older people in the short term.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Reform candidates are making promises they can’t keep

Published

on

Nigel Farage and a hand with fingers crossed Reform

Nigel Farage and a hand with fingers crossed Reform

In the UK, it’s sadly common for politicians to make promises they have no intention of keeping. Usually, however, they at least promise things they could plausibly achieve. This is not the case with what some would-be Reform councillors are promising:

What can Reform do for you?

The full post is from the Facebook page Reform Are Not Your Friends. We’re going to have a look to see if we can confirm their analysis:

Advertisement

1⃣ “Put Londoners first for social housing”

❌ Reality: That’s set by central government and the Mayor of London. Watford isn’t in London.

Just because Watford isn’t in London, that doesn’t mean they can’t prioritise Londoners. It would be a strange thing to do, obviously, but would it be any stranger than this?

2⃣ “Oppose housing illegal immigrants in hotels”

❌ Reality: This is controlled by the Home Office. Councils don’t decide asylum accommodation.

To be completely fair, councils can “oppose” local migrant hotels. Whether it will make any difference is another matter entirely.

There are good reasons to oppose the policy of boxing migrants in hotels (as opposed to allowing them to live and work in communities). Reform aren’t making that argument, though; they’re just punching down, because they’re bullies.

3⃣ “Support our struggling high streets”

✅ Reality: This is one of the few things the council actually can influence. Local investment, planning, events.

Good on Reform for getting one right!

Advertisement

4⃣ “End ULEZ and the war on drivers”

❌ Reality: The Ultra Low Emission Zone is run by the Mayor of London. Watford has no authority over it.

I.e. Reform have lost the war on drivers.

Embarrassing, honestly.

It’s also embarrassing that Reform is yet another party which refuses to acknowledge the benefits of cycling and mass public transport:

Advertisement

If you’re a diehard motorist, you should want as many people on buses and bikes as possible.

Unless you’re actually a diehard ‘sitting in traffic’ person, obviously, in which case carry on.

Advertisement

5⃣ “Crack down on anti-social behaviour”

❌ Reality: Policing is handled by Hertfordshire Constabulary. The council plays a supporting role at best.

Councils do cover things which fall under the blanket of ‘anti-social behaviour’ (graffiti, fly-tipping, etc). At the same time, candidate Mark Dixon doesn’t clarify how he’ll fix these issues; he just says he’ll magically save money elsewhere.

As we’ve seen with the Reform-run councils, these savings keep failing to materialise. In fact, Reform have actually increased spending in some instances – including on their own pay packets.

Absolute shower

All in all, it looks like Dixon doesn’t know what he’s running for. And as they say, where there is no vision, there is no gold.

Oh wait, actually, that’s wrong isn’t it; this is the actual phrase:

Advertisement

What’s going on with these Reform candidates?

Featured image via Virrage (via Canva)

Advertisement

By Willem Moore

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

The BBC runs cover for Israel (again) over destruction of Christ statue in Lebanon

Published

on

An Israeli soldier takes a sledgehammer to the face of a crucified Jesus Christ statue, which is on the ground. Taken from a BBC News report

An Israeli soldier takes a sledgehammer to the face of a crucified Jesus Christ statue, which is on the ground. Taken from a BBC News report

The BBC has, yet again, tried to provide cover for Israeli criminality and mitigate damage to its already appalling reputation.

Support among the misguided ‘Christian’ right for the US-Israel war on Iran had already been rocked by Trump’s self-indulgent post of himself as Jesus. Images of an Israeli soldier attacking a statue of the crucified Jesus during Israel’s illegal invasion of Lebanon are doing more damage still, so the BBC did its best to cover and fudge, as commentator Saul Staniforth noted.

BBC journo: ‘allegedly’. Israel: ‘No, it’s real actually’

The presenter’s attempted obfuscation that the image only “allegedly” showed the attack was made even more ridiculous by the fact that the Israeli regime has already admitted it’s real. More ridiculous still by the fact that the correspondent mentioned this. But the BBC is no stranger to self-humiliation for propaganda purposes, particularly regarding Israel.

The ‘Christian’ right, particularly but not exclusively in the US, supports Israel because of a twisted theology that claims Jesus can only return with ‘Israel’ back on land it has stolen from the Palestinians.

Israeli contempt for Christians is well established, such as their spitting on Christian pilgrims. Extremist Israeli ‘security’ minister, Itamar Ben-Gvir, defended this practice as ‘tradition’.

Advertisement

The ‘Christian nationalist’ right has been happy to suck up this humiliation and ignore Israel’s slaughter of Christians and the destruction of churches in Gaza. However, images of Zionist US president, Donald Trump, depicting himself as Jesus as he does Israel’s prime minister, Benjamin Netanyahu’s war bidding  — and now of an IOF soldier attacking a statue of the suffering Christ with a sledgehammer — threaten that Pavlovian support.

A worried Netanyahu condemned it and said the IOF is investigating — marking its own homework as ever while the scandal dies down.

Never fear, though. The BBC will always do its best to deflect and defuse for the occupiers.

Featured image via BBC News

Advertisement

By Skwawkbox

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

HuffPost Headlines For April 20th

Published

on

HuffPost Headlines For April 20th

!function(n){if(!window.cnx){window.cnx={},window.cnx.cmd=[];var t=n.createElement(‘iframe’);t.display=’none’,t.onload=function(){var n=t.contentWindow.document,c=n.createElement(‘script’);c.src=”//cd.connatix.com/connatix.player.js”,c.setAttribute(‘async’,’1′),c.setAttribute(‘type’,’text/javascript’),n.body.appendChild(c)},n.head.appendChild(t)}}(document);(new Image()).src=”https://capi.connatix.com/tr/si?token=19654b65-409c-4b38-90db-80cbdea02cf4″;cnx.cmd.push(function(){cnx({“playerId”:”19654b65-409c-4b38-90db-80cbdea02cf4″,”mediaId”:”79183ff1-7e83-494f-bd99-94ce0d77cd77″}).render(“69e6512ae4b0b6f552bb3b56”);});

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Olivia Colman has been recast in Heartstopper

Published

on

Olivia Colman has been recast in Heartstopper

!function(n){if(!window.cnx){window.cnx={},window.cnx.cmd=[];var t=n.createElement(‘iframe’);t.display=’none’,t.onload=function(){var n=t.contentWindow.document,c=n.createElement(‘script’);c.src=”//cd.connatix.com/connatix.player.js”,c.setAttribute(‘async’,’1′),c.setAttribute(‘type’,’text/javascript’),n.body.appendChild(c)},n.head.appendChild(t)}}(document);(new Image()).src=”https://capi.connatix.com/tr/si?token=19654b65-409c-4b38-90db-80cbdea02cf4″;cnx.cmd.push(function(){cnx({“playerId”:”19654b65-409c-4b38-90db-80cbdea02cf4″,”mediaId”:”285f6daf-e766-4c59-97f4-506cd638efbf”}).render(“69e65129e4b09c81bf19a4c2”);});

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Scottish Greens unveil plans on midwife training and household repair scheme

Published

on

Scottish Greens holding placards

Scottish Greens holding placards

The Scottish Greens have been laying out policy plans ahead of the Holyrood elections on 7 May. The party is hoping for a “breakthrough” result.

They’ve pledged action to make maternity care safer for women, babies and staff. The Greens would introduce earn-as-you-learn routes to bring more people into the midwife profession and ensure that financial barriers don’t put off those who want to train.

And as part of plans to cut the cost of living and protect the environment, the Scottish Greens will introduce a Scottish Repair Voucher scheme. This would allow people to get a discount on repairing household goods at participating manufacturers and retailers.

Safer maternity services

Earn-as-you-learn midwife training is part of a range of measures. These will also include minimum safe staffing levels on all maternity and labour wards.

Advertisement

The Scottish Greens say the changes are vital to ease pressure on overstretched maternity services. And they would ensure women and families get the safe, high-quality care they deserve throughout pregnancy, labour and the postnatal period.

Scottish Greens co-leader Gillian Mackay said:

Too many women and families are being let down by a maternity system that is under enormous strain while midwives are being asked to do more and more in overstretched services. That is not fair on them or on the people relying on their care.

For far too long, staff have been carrying the burden of workforce shortages, rising pressure and a system that is too often stretched beyond safe limits. That has real consequences for the quality of care, for staff wellbeing and for the confidence families should be able to have in maternity services.

Dignity, safety and making sure every family gets the care they deserve at one of the most important moments in their lives is crucial. Women should know that when they need care, the right staff will be there, with the time and capacity to support them properly.

Advertisement

That is why the Scottish Greens are committed to introducing minimum safe staffing levels on all maternity and labour wards and expanding the midwife workforce by creating accessible earn-as-you-learn routes into midwifery.

Because, if we are serious about fixing the staffing crisis, we need to remove the barriers that prevent more people from taking up training in the profession in the first place.

On 7 May, people have a chance to vote for the Scottish Greens who will demand better for women’s health, better for maternity care and better for the staff who keep these services going.

Greens to introduce Scottish Repair Voucher scheme

A coalition of charities and waste management groups launched the UK’s first repair voucher pilot scheme in North London in 2025. It allowed residents to get up to 50% off the cost of repairs at participating businesses.

Advertisement

Similar schemes have already proven successful in other European countries, including Austria, France and Germany.

This is part of a package of measures that the party is proposing to reduce waste and save people money. This would include a requirement on some product manufacturers to take back used products, such as mattresses and textiles, at the end of their life.

Mackay said:

If we’re serious about tackling the cost-of-living crisis and the climate crisis, then we have to make it cheaper and easier for people to do the right thing. Our repair voucher scheme will make it cheaper to repair the things we already own rather than buying them again as new.

It is a simple and straightforward way of putting money back into people’s pockets. By covering part of the cost of fixing everyday items, we can help households to stretch their budgets and avoid unnecessary big purchases.

Advertisement

The benefits are wider, as it will also help us to cut waste while supporting local repair businesses. It’s a win for households struggling with the cost of living, and a win for the small businesses rooted in our communities.

These kinds of schemes are already common across Europe and are already helping to support people through the cost of living crisis while reducing waste and protecting our planet. It’s time to do the same in Scotland.

Featured image via the Canary

By The Canary

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

UK commitment to war and capitalism could make 250k people jobless in 2027

Published

on

Trump Starmer Iran

Trump Starmer Iran

A global accounting giant and an economic forecasting firm say the war in Iran could see 250,000 people lose their jobs in 2027. The math is simple: the ruling class wages war and makes money, and workers carry the costs. Professional services giant Deloitte and economic forecasters at EY Item Club delivered their warning on 20 April.

Iran: economic blowback

The Guardian reported:

The EY Item Club also expects unemployment to hit 5.8% by the middle of 2027, up from the current five-year high of 5.2%, with almost 250,000 more people losing their jobs because of the crisis in the Middle East.

Adding:

If the forecast is correct, that would increase the number of jobseekers from 1.87 million now to more than 2.1 million.

Meanwhile, EY Item Club economist Matt Swannell said:

Advertisement

Spiralling energy costs and disruption to supply chains will push the UK to the brink of a technical recession in the middle of this year.

Consumers’ spending power will be squeezed, while more expensive financing arrangements and a less certain global economic backdrop will pour cold water on companies’ investment plans.

Deloitte’s head economist Ian Stewart told the Guardian:

Finance leaders are coping with high levels of external uncertainty and their focus is on managing risks from geopolitics, rising energy prices and higher financing costs,” said Ian Stewart, the chief economist at Deloitte UK.

‘Cost control’ = job cuts

The newspaper reported:

When asked about the consequences of adverse geopolitical developments over the next three years, the top three concerns among CFOs were energy costs (61%), inflation and interest rates (61%) and an increase in cyber-attacks (60%).

Stewart said:

Advertisement

Rarely in the last 16 years have UK CFOs been more focused on cost control than today.

He said the current “challenging environment”:

is prompting CFOs to scale back expectations for margins and sharpen their focus on cost reduction and cash conservation.

Adding:

The immediate priority for finance leaders is to strengthen balance sheets in the face of external headwinds.

Let’s translate this into plain English…

The foreign policy decisions – notably around Iran – of Trump and Starmer are coming home to roost. And the victims of any downturn aren’t going to be millionaires and billionaires. Hard-pressed workers will be hit to “strengthen balance sheets” in the “face” of “external headwinds”. That is to say, their jobs could be cut to keep the  bank accounts of the wealthy swollen.

Advertisement

Any sensible political party would push against this. But none of the big parties is likely to…

People say British mainstream politicians are impossible to tell apart. That charge is essentially true. The fact is they all align on having an aggressive foreign policy and a commitment to free market capitalism.

Some would say foreign policy doesn’t figure in domestic elections – especially council elections. But these are not normal times. Faced with rising fascism, there are few electoral alternatives to the brutal free market capitalism and forever wars which produce it. Yet they do exist. Local council elections are on 7 May 2026. You can find out about eligibility, ID requirements and register to vote here.

Featured image via the Canary

Advertisement

By Joe Glenton

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

How UK Fliers Can Prep For EES, From Jet 2, TUI, easyJet

Published

on

How UK Fliers Can Prep For EES, From Jet 2, TUI, easyJet

The EU’s new Entry/Exit System (EES) has fully kicked into place for UK passengers after its October rollout.

It’s a biometric system (including a photo and/or fingerprints) that registers non-EU nationals every time they make a short stay in Schengen countries.

The EU’s site says it’s designed to eventually replace passport stamps and offer a more “efficient” version of EU check-ins. But so far, there have been early hiccups: EES has been blamed for border delays that left passengers behind and “hours-long queues”.

In response, airlines like TUI, Jet2, and easyJet have shared advice.

Advertisement

Which countries are affected by the EES system?

The Schengen countries involved are:

  • Austria,
  • Belgium,
  • Bulgaria,
  • Croatia,
  • Czechia,
  • Denmark,
  • Estonia,
  • Finland,
  • France,
  • Germany,
  • Greece,
  • Hungary,
  • Iceland,
  • Italy,
  • Latvia,
  • Liechtenstein,
  • Lithuania,
  • Luxembourg,
  • Malta,
  • Netherlands,
  • Norway,
  • Poland,
  • Portugal,
  • Romania,
  • Slovakia,
  • Slovenia,
  • Spain,
  • Sweden, and
  • Switzerland.

The Republic of Ireland and Cyprus are excluded from EES systems as they’re not Schengen countries.

What advice have airlines given to UK travellers for EES checkins?

The advice so far includes:

Advertisement

British Airways

Their site reads, “You should allow extra time to register your biometric details, such as fingerprints and a photo, the first time you enter the EU. There is no cost for EES registration, and your digital record will last three years before you need to register again.”

And responding to an X post by a passenger, the company added: “We ask customers travelling on our European short-haul flights to be there two hours prior to departure. It would be three hours if you’re travelling on a long-haul flight and one if you’re travelling on a domestic flight within the UK.”

Hi there. We ask customers travelling on our European short haul flights to be there two hours prior to departure. It would be three hours if you’re travelling on a long haul flight and one if you’re travelling on a domestic flight within the UK. Corry

— British Airways (@British_Airways) April 16, 2026

Advertisement

TUI

In a travel alert, they said: “At some airports, you might still find longer queues, particularly at busy travel periods.”

They added, “To help your journey run as smoothly as possible, please allow a little extra time when passing through border control. Keep any essential medication in your hand luggage in case of delays, and when departing the EU, head straight to passport control after dropping your bags to avoid hold‑ups. Bringing some extra water for comfort is also a good idea.”

Jet 2

Advertisement

The company shared, “There may be longer wait times at Border Control at some EU Airports, especially at busy times. Once you start your EES registration, it should take around 1-2 minutes per person to complete.

“There may be longer wait times than usual when you arrive in destination and before your flight back to the UK. Unfortunately, this is outside of our control. But remember, there’s nothing you can prep before you travel.”

The airline added, “You’ll also need to pass through EES when leaving the EU in the same way you do on arrival. Depending on how busy the airport is, this may result in longer wait times at passport control before boarding your flight to the UK. After checking in for your flight, please head straight to security and passport control in order to arrive at your gate in plenty of time.”

easyJet

Advertisement

The airline pointed out that while kids under 12 are exempt from fingerprinting, passengers “may experience longer waiting times on arrival, so allow extra time and factor this in when planning onward travel, including trains, taxis, or flight transfers”.

Plan your journey, arrive early, use Bag Drop as soon as possible if you’re availing of the service, get through security as fast as possible, and “be aware that there may be further checks at passport control after security and before reaching your gate,” they said.

Ryanair

They warned that queues might be longer as airports adjust to the system.

Advertisement

“Have your passport ready and follow EES signs,” they wrote.

“We recommend arriving at the airport with extra time to allow for these additional checks, especially during busy travel periods.”

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

This Device Made Me Realise Just How Weak My Pelvic Floor Really Is

Published

on

This Device Made Me Realise Just How Weak My Pelvic Floor Really Is

We hope you love the products we recommend! All of them were independently selected by our editors. Just so you know, HuffPost UK may collect a share of sales or other compensation from the links on this page if you decide to shop from them. Oh, and FYI — prices are accurate and items in stock as of time of publication.

Other than at the gym and when I have a UTI (which is, unfortunately, pretty often) my pelvic floor isn’t something I’ve ever given much thought to.

Admittedly, I pee probably 20 times a day (for real) but I’d always attributed that to the fact I drink a shit ton of water, tea, and coffee.

Whenever I see those ‘do your kegels with me’ videos on TikTok or Instagram reels, I’ll follow along (I’m fickle, after all). And by my judgement, it does seem like I know how to do a kegel.

Advertisement

But otherwise, I go about my life pretty much entirely ignorant of my pelvic floor health.

When I heard that Smile Makers Collection – the creators of some of my favourite sex toys like the Ballerina and Poet – was venturing into the wellness category with the launch of Pelvic Partner, I wasn’t exactly excited.

I mean, vibrators are one thing, but pelvic floor trainers are another thing – perhaps necessary, but they’re not going to give you any thrills. Or, so I thought.

When I received the Pelvic Partner, though, that changed everything I thought I knew about the pelvic floor.

What is the pelvic floor and how do you engage it?

Advertisement

If, like me, you’re wondering why the pelvic floor really matters, it might surprise you to learn that strengthening this group of hidden muscles can help prevent unwanted symptoms as you age.

The muscles surround the bladder, bowels, and reproductive organs, which means they can weaken as you age, during menopause, or during and after childbirth.

Weak pelvic floor muscles can result in incontinence, instability, lower back pain, and needing the toilet often, while having a pelvic floor that is too tight can also result in constipation, pain during sex, and erectile dysfunction.

To prevent your pelvic floor weakening as you age, the NHS recommends doing daily pelvic floor exercises. This involves squeezing your muscles to engage them for two seconds and releasing, and repeating 10 times.

Advertisement

Not sure how to tell you’re doing it right? The NHS describes the sensation as the same as when you’re stopping yourself from peeing and farting. So it’s about to get hot and sexy up in here.

How to use the Pelvic Partner

Thankfully, Pelvic Partner easy as to use (you’re not going to get me to do exercise any other way).

After charging it using the USB cable, you simply slather the surface in lube, pop it inside your vagina up until the ‘comfort line’ and bend the tail towards your belly button.

Advertisement

You then turn it on, using the button at the end of the tail, and switch between the eight ‘training programmes’ the toy is equipped with.

Just like you’d train at the gym, Smile Makers Collection recommends using the Partner three times a week for two to three sets, at 10-15 reps per session.

To start with, the brand suggests choosing a setting you can complete all your exercises with. Settings one and two are ‘gentle’ to teach you how to engage your pelvic floor; three and four are ‘building’; five and six are ‘strong’; and seven and eight are ‘advanced’.

Once you feel like it’s easy to complete your session, you can move up to the next setting. This would be easy, I thought.

Advertisement

My review of the Pelvic Partner

How I tested

About me: I’m a 26-year-old woman who doesn’t have children. I’ve been testing sex toys and sexual wellness products for around five years, both in this role and my previous role at Cosmopolitan, Women’s Health, and Men’s Health, as well as while running my podcast/magazine, Sextras.

I’ve been using Smile Makers Collection’s Pelvic Partner for three weeks, making sure to not testing any other pelvic floor products at the same time.

As someone who has never done pelvic floor exercises consistently, I made sure to stick to a regime of three times a week. I also followed the brand’s instructions of how to use the trainer to make sure I was getting the most out of it.

Advertisement

First impressions

First up, this little orange device has two bulbous spheres that are supposed to sit inside your vagina – and just from giving it a squeeze with my hands, it felt fantastic.

Covered in smooth silicone, the toy has a cushiony feel to it, which is unlike other internal sex toys and pelvic floor trainers I’ve tried. This also makes it slick enough for washing it to take seconds.

Upon turning it on, I could tell exactly how the toy would work. It’s loaded with 360 degrees of haptic squeeze sensors, which means it vibrates when you’re engaging your pelvic floor.

Advertisement

To make sure you know what setting you’re on, the trainer will buzz the same amount of times, making it extremely intuitive.

Even better, it doesn’t require an app, so I knew I wouldn’t have to worry about it storing any of my sensitive data.

Final verdict

As someone who has done mat Pilates at least once a week for the last few years, I have always believed myself to know where my pelvic floor muscles are, and how to engage them. I’ve also never had any serious health conditions linked to my pelvic floor, so I didn’t think I had any issues with strength down there.

Advertisement

The first time I tried this trainer, it became clear just how wrong I was. While its first two settings felt like light work – it immediately vibrated at even the slightest contraction on the first one – the move up to the third setting was significant.

While I could easily do 10 reps, it felt tricky (to say the least) to keep going after just one set. I just about managed two, and thought I’d move up to the fourth programme just to see if I could hack it. But no ball. No matter how hard I tried, I simply could not make the damn thing buzz.

Now, I’m not exactly a competitive person, which is why I’ve always been a begrudging exerciser. With this trainer, though, I started to feel myself become competitive the more I used it.

Determined to move up through the strengths, I committed to using it three times a week.

Advertisement

And in the span of a mere seven days, I was able to move up to the fourth setting with no problem at all.

I even think the trainer has helped with my posture and my workouts. At my weekly Pilates class, I have found myself engaging my core in a way I didn’t know I needed to previously.

Another welcome side effect is that my orgasms feel slightly stronger, or at least I’m more aware of my pelvic floor during penetration – and I’m excited to see how this builds as I work up through the programmes.

Overall, I’d rate the trainer five stars – both for design, ease of use, and results I didn’t know I needed.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Mandelson process ‘beggars belief’: Keir Starmer’s statement to parliament in full

Published

on

MDU logo

Keir Starmer has said it “beggars belief” that he was not told the full story about Peter Mandelson’s vetting by Foreign Office officials. 

The prime minister acknowledged that many MPs would find his remarks about the latest Mandelson revelations “to be incredible”.

The comments came as Starmer delivered a statement to the House of Commons updating MPs on the appointment of Mandelson as British ambassador to the United States. 

Read the full statement below: 

Advertisement

Thank you Mr Speaker, with permission…

I would like to provide the House with information I now have…

About the appointment of Peter Mandelson…

As our ambassador to the United States.

Advertisement

But Mr. Speaker, before I go into the details…

I want to be very clear with this House…

That, while this statement will focus…

On the process surrounding Peter Mandelson’s vetting and appointment…

Advertisement

At the heart of this, there is also a judgement I made that was wrong.

I should not have appointed Peter Mandelson.

I take responsibility for that decision.

And I apologise, again…

Advertisement

To the victims of the paedophile, Jeffrey Esptein…

Who were clearly failed by my decision.

Mr. Speaker, last Tuesday evening, the 14th of April…

I found out, for the first time…

Advertisement

That on the 29th January 2025…

Before Peter Mandelson took up his position as Ambassador…

The Foreign Office officials granted him developed vetting clearance…

Against the specific recommendation of United Kingdom Security Vetting…

Advertisement

That developed vetting clearance should be denied.

Not only that…

The Foreign Office officials who made that decision…

Did not pass this information…

Advertisement

To me…

To the Foreign Secretary…

To her predecessor, the Deputy Prime Minister…

To any other Minister…

Advertisement

Or even to the former Cabinet Secretary, Sir Chris Wormald.

I found this staggering.

And therefore, last Tuesday…

I immediately instructed officials in Downing Street and the Cabinet Office…

Advertisement

To urgently establish the facts on my authority.

I wanted to know who made the decision…

On what basis…

Who knew…

Advertisement

And Mr Speaker I wanted that information…

For the precise and explicit purpose of updating this House.

Because this is information I should have had a long time ago…

And it is information this House should have had a long time ago.

Advertisement

Information that I and the House had a right to know.

I will now set out a full timeline of the events in the Peter Mandelson process…

Including from the fact-finding exercise I instructed last Tuesday.

Before doing so – I want to remind and reassure the House…

Advertisement

That the Government will comply fully…

With the Humble Address motion of the 4th February.

Mr Speaker, in December 2024

I was in the process of appointing a new Ambassador for Washington.

Advertisement

A due diligence exercise was conducted by the Cabinet Office…

Into Peter Mandelson’s suitability…

Including questions put to him by my staff in Number 10.

Peter Mandelson answered those questions on the 10th December…

Advertisement

And I received final advice on the due diligence process on the 11th.

I made the decision to appoint him on the 18th December…

The appointment was announced on the 20th…

And the security vetting process began on the 23rd December 2024.

Advertisement

Mr Speaker, I want to make clear to the House…

That for a Direct Ministerial Appointment…

It was usual for security vetting to happen after the appointment…

But before starting in post.

Advertisement

That was the process in place at the time…

Mr Speaker, this was confirmed by the former Cabinet Secretary, Sir Chris Wormald…

At the Foreign Affairs Select Committee on the 3rd of November 2025 when he gave evidence…

Sir Chris made clear, and I’m quoting him now:

Advertisement

“When we are making appointments from outside the civil service…

The normal thing is for the security clearance to happen after appointment…

But before the person signs a contract and takes up post…”

At the same hearing of the same Select Committee…

Advertisement

The former Permanent Secretary to the Foreign Office, Sir Olly Robbins said, and I quote again…

Peter Mandelson “did not hold national security vetting when he was appointed…

But as is normally the case with external appointments to my Department and the wider civil service…

The appointment was made subject to obtaining security clearance”.

Advertisement

Mr Speaker, after I sacked Peter Mandelson…

I changed that process…

So that now an appointment cannot be announced…

Until after security vetting is passed.

Advertisement

Mr Speaker, the security vetting was carried out by UK Security Vetting (UKSV)…

Between the 23rd of December 2024 and the 28th of January 2025.

UKSV conducted vetting, in the normal way…

Collecting relevant information…

Advertisement

As well as interviewing the applicant – in this case, on two occasions.

Then, on the 28th of January 2025…

UKSV recommended to the Foreign Office…

That developed vetting clearance should be denied to Peter Mandelson.

Advertisement

The following day, on the 29th of January 2025…

Notwithstanding the UKSV recommendation that developed vetting clearance should be denied…

Foreign Office officials made the decision…

To grant developed vetting clearance for Peter Mandelson.

Advertisement

To be clear…

For many Departments, a decision from UKSV is binding.

But for the Foreign Office, the final decision on developed vetting clearance…

Is made by Foreign Office officials…

Advertisement

Not UKSV.

However, once the decision in this case came to light…

The Foreign Office’s power to make the final decision on developed vetting clearance…

Was immediately suspended by my Chief Secretary last week.

Advertisement

Mr Speaker, I accept that the sensitive personal information provided by an individual being vetted… Must be protected from disclosure.

If that were not the case, the integrity of the whole process would be compromised.

What I do not accept…

Is that the appointing minister cannot be told of the recommendation by UKSV.

Advertisement

Indeed, given the seriousness of these issues…

And the significance of the appointment…

I simply do not accept that Foreign Office officials could not have informed me…

Of UKSV’s recommendations…

Advertisement

Whilst also maintaining the necessary confidentiality that vetting requires.

There is no law that stops Civil Servants sensibly flagging UKSV recommendations

While protecting detailed sensitive vetting information…

To allow Ministers to make judgements on appointments or on explaining matters to Parliament.
So let me be very clear, the recommendation in the Peter Mandelson case could and should have been shared with me…

Advertisement

Before he took up his post.

Mr Speaker

Let me make a second point.

If I had known, before he took up his post…

Advertisement

That UKSV recommendation was that developed vetting should be denied…

I would not have gone ahead with the appointment.

Mr. Speaker, let me now move to September 2025…

Because events then – and subsequently…

Advertisement

Show with even starker clarity…

The opportunities missed by Foreign Office officials…

To make the position clear.

On September 10th, Bloomberg reported fresh details of Mandelson’s history with Epstein…

Advertisement

And it was then clear to me…

That Peter Mandelson’s answers to my staff in the due diligence exercise were not truthful…

And I sacked him.

I also changed the Direct Ministerial Appointments process…

Advertisement

So full due diligence is now required as standard…

Where risks are identified – an interview must be taken, pre-appointment…

To discuss any risks and conflicts of interest…

And a summary of this should be provided to the appointing Minister…

Advertisement

I also made clear that public announcements should not now be made until security vetting has been completed.

Mr Speaker, in light of the revelations in September of last year, I also agreed with the then Cabinet Secretary, Sir Chris Wormald…

That he would carry out a review of the appointment process in the Peter Mandelson case, including the vetting.

He set out his findings and conclusions in a letter to me on the 16th of September.

Advertisement

He advised me, in that letter, and again I quote…

“The evidence I have reviewed leads me to conclude that appropriate processes were followed…

In both the appointment and withdrawal of the former HMA Washington”.

When he was asked about this, Mr Speaker, last week…

Advertisement

The then Cabinet Secretary was clear…

That when he carried out his review, the Foreign Office…

Did not tell him about the UKSV recommendation…

That developed vetting clearance should be denied to Peter Mandelson.

Advertisement

I find that astonishing.

As I set out…

I do not accept that I could not have been told about the recommendation…
Before Peter Mandelson took up his post.

I absolutely do not accept that the then Cabinet Secretary – an official not a politician –
when carrying out his review, could not have been told…

Advertisement

That UKSV recommended that Peter Mandelson should be denied developed vetting clearance…

It was a vital part of the process that I had asked him to review…

Clearly, he could have been told and he should have been told.

Mr Speaker, on the same day as the then Cabinet Secretary wrote to me – so that’s the 16th of September 2025…

Advertisement

The Foreign Secretary and the then Permanent Secretary of the Foreign Office, Sir Olly Robbins…

Provided a signed statement to the Foreign Affairs Select Committee.

The statement says, and again I quote…

“The vetting process was undertaken by UK Security Vetting on behalf of the FCDO…

Advertisement

And concluded with DV clearance being granted by the FCDO…

In advance of Lord Mandelson taking up post in February.

It went on to say, and again I quote:

“Peter Mandelson’s security vetting was conducted to the usual standard set for Developed Vetting in line with established Cabinet Office policy”.

Advertisement

Mr. Speaker, let me be very clear to the House…

This was in response to questions which included…

Whether concerns were raised…

What the Foreign Office’s response was…

Advertisement

And whether they were dismissed.

Mr. Speaker, that the Foreign Secretary was advised on…

And allowed to sign this statement by Foreign Office officials…

Without being told that UKSV had recommended Peter Mandelson be denied developed vetting clearance…

Advertisement

Is absolutely unforgivable.

This is a Senior Cabinet Member…

Giving evidence to Parliament…

On the very issue in question.

Advertisement

Mr Speaker, in light of further revelations about Peter Mandelson in February of this year…

I was very concerned about the fact that developed vetting clearance had been granted to him.

Not knowing that, in fact, UKSV had recommended denial of developed vetting clearance…

I instructed my officials to carry out a review of the national security vetting process.

Advertisement

As I set out…

I do not accept that I could not have been told about UKSV’s denial of security vetting before Peter Mandelson took up his post in January 2025.

I do not accept that the then Cabinet Secretary could not have been told in September 2025…

When he carried out his review into the process.

Advertisement

I do not accept that the Foreign Secretary…

Could not have been told when making statements to the Select Committee, again in 2025.

But, Mr Speaker, on top of that, the fact that I was not told even when I ordered a review of the UKSV process…

Is frankly staggering.

Advertisement

And I can tell the House,

That I have now updated the Terms of Reference for the review into Security Vetting…

To make sure it covers the means by which all decisions are made in relation to National Security Vetting

I have appointed Sir Adrian Fulford to lead the review.

Advertisement

Separately…

I have asked the Government Security Group in the Cabinet Office…

To look at any security concerns raised during Peter Mandelson’s tenure.

Mr. Speaker…

Advertisement

I know many members across the House…

Will find these facts to be incredible.

To that I can only say – they are right.

It beggars belief…

Advertisement

That throughout the whole timeline of events…

Officials in the Foreign Office…

Saw fit to withhold this information…

From the most senior Ministers in our system in Government.

Advertisement

That is not how the vast majority of people in this country…

Expect politics, government, or accountability to work.

And I do not think it is how most public servants think it should work, either.

I work with hundreds of civil servants…

Advertisement

Thousands even…

All of whom act with the utmost integrity, dedication and pride to serve this country…

Including officials from the Foreign Office…

Who as we speak…

Advertisement

Are doing a phenomenal job…

Representing our national interest in a dangerous world…

In Ukraine…

In the Middle East…

Advertisement

And all around the world.

This is not about them.

But yet it is surely beyond doubt…

That the recommendation from UKSV…

Advertisement

That Peter Mandelson should be denied developed vetting clearance…

Was information…

That could and should have been shared with me on repeated occasions…

And therefore, should have been available to this House…

Advertisement

And ultimately to the British people…

And I commend this statement to the House.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2025