Atoning for a luckless last-start defeat, Hello Captain has stretched his record to four wins from six starts at Rosehill, and if he can stretch in distance, trainer Chris Waller says the sky is the limit.

The three-year-old colt scored over 1300m in Saturday’s Find Your Stakes Winner @ The Chase Handicap, but if he can extend that brilliance to a mile, Waller believes he can feature in much better races.

“In terms of distance, I think he can get to a mile and if he can get to a mile, he can get to a good race. Maybe an Epsom Handicap,” Waller said.

“Timing-wise, it’s hard to predict when he gets there, and distance-wise we’re still learning about the horse.

“But he’s settling better than he has ever settled before and he’s showing a good turn of foot.”

Given time to find his feet by stable apprentice Siena Grima, Hello Captain ($1.65 favourite according to leading betting apps Australia) enjoyed an unimpeded run down to score by 2-1/4 lengths over Sequista ($7.50), who ran her usual honest race, with Attractiveness ($9) third.

The gelding’s win made amends for his last-start fourth to Cheeky Smirk when he was badly strung up for a run before flashing home when finally given clear air.

While Waller believes Hello Captain has the potential to measure up to stakes grade, in the short term he is content for the horse to ply his trade in Saturday company and build his bank account.

“Sydney races, they’re worth $160,000 every Saturday, fifty-two weeks a year,” Waller said.

“It’s hard to knock it back when they’re on every week, so I think we keep going through his grades.

“Maybe he doesn’t have to run every two weeks like we normally do. We can pick out a race in three or four weeks, and we might get longevity out of him that way.”

Hello Captain gave Grima a double after her earlier win aboard exciting two-year-old Omolong, drawing her level with Braith Nock in the race for the Sydney apprentices’ premiership.

Check out the latest racing odds at these racing betting markets.

The controversy surrounding the decision to overturn the suspension of United States striker Folarin Balogun has created one of the darkest moments in recent FIFA World Cup history. Whether FIFA’s decision was influenced by political pressure or not, the perception alone has already caused significant damage to the credibility of the tournament.

Football has always prided itself on being a sport governed by clear rules and fair competition. Players, coaches and supporters accept victories and defeats because they trust that the same laws apply to everyone. Once that trust begins to disappear, the very foundation of the game is threatened.

FIFA’s decision to allow Balogun to play against Belgium after receiving a red card has raised serious questions. Reports that a phone call from United States President Donald Trump to FIFA President Gianni Infantino preceded the decision have only intensified the controversy. UEFA’s description of the move as “unprecedented, incomprehensible and unjustifiable” reflects the concerns shared by many across the football world.

Ironically, this decision may have done more harm to the United States than good.

Football fans around the world have always admired the underdog and rallied behind teams perceived to have been treated unfairly. In this case, many neutral supporters who may have had no strong feelings about the United States versus Belgium match could now find themselves supporting Belgium out of a belief that sporting fairness has been compromised.

The United States entered the tournament as one of three host nations alongside Canada and Mexico. Both fellow hosts have already been eliminated. Instead of entering their crucial knockout match backed by goodwill and sporting merit, the United States now faces the burden of controversy and suspicion.

History shows that football rarely rewards those who appear to gain an unfair advantage. The pressure, scrutiny and public reaction can become overwhelming. There is now a growing feeling among many neutrals that Belgium has become the team representing sporting justice in this particular contest.

This situation goes far beyond one player or one match. It concerns the principle that football must remain independent of political influence. If political leaders can intervene in disciplinary decisions at the world’s biggest tournament, where does it stop? Will future suspensions, refereeing appointments or disciplinary cases also become subjects of political negotiation?

Football has survived corruption scandals, controversial refereeing decisions and administrative failures because supporters have continued to believe in the integrity of the game itself. That integrity cannot be taken for granted.

If Belgium defeats the United States, many will argue that football has corrected an injustice on the pitch. If the United States wins, the controversy will likely continue long after the final whistle.

Whatever happens, one message should be clear to FIFA and every governing body in world football: politics must never be allowed to overshadow the game.

At the World Cup, there should only be one winner above all else:

Football must win.

Italy’s Jasmine Paolini is congratulated by Philippines’ Alex Eala after winning their women’s singles round of 16 tennis match on the eighth day of the 2026 Wimbledon Championships at The All England Lawn Tennis and Croquet Club in Wimbledon, southwest London, on July 6, 2026. (Photo by Adrian Dennis / AFP)

LIVE: Alex Eala vs Jasmine Paolini – Wimbledon round of 16

Jasmine Paolini reached her first Grand Slam quarterfinal in two years, edging out Alex Eala in a tense last 16 match at Wimbledon on Monday.

Italian 13th seed Paolini ended the run of Iga Swiatek’s conqueror Eala with a gritty 6-4, 4-6, 6-3 victory on Centre Court.

READ: Alex Eala’s historic Wimbledon ends vs Jasmine Paolini

“He’s my idol!”

A match Jasmine Paolini will never forget with @rogerfederer watching on from the Royal Box#Wimbledon pic.twitter.com/1Uh95JxmKr

Advertisement

— Wimbledon (@Wimbledon) July 6, 2026

“I feel so lucky to have this opportunity and so lucky to get the win,” said Paolini, before addressing the watching Roger Federer in the royal box.

“He’s my idol and during the match I was like please stay focused and don’t think about him (Federer) being here… It’s an amazing feeling to be here right now with the win.”

Paolini will face Marta Kostyuk of Ukraine in her first major quarter-final since reaching the Wimbledon final in 2024, when she lost to Barbora Krejcikova in three sets.

The Italian was also the French Open runner-up to Swiatek in 2024.

She has struggled for most of this season but has rediscovered her form at the All England Club since losing the opening set of her first-round match 6-0.

READ: Alex Eala targets Wimbledon quarterfinals, more history for Philippines

“After the first set in the first round I was like ‘Okay, it can only go better’… point by point, game by game, I was feeling better,” Paolini added.

The 21-year-old Eala had become the first woman from the Philippines to reach the third and fourth rounds of a Slam, but despite threatening a comeback in the second set, could not get the better of the wily Paolini.

The 30-year-old Paolini clinched a nip-and-tuck opening set with a break, having failed to serve it out in the previous game.

After the players traded early breaks in the second set, 29th seed Eala broke for a 4-3 lead and then held from 0-40 down in the next game.

The left-hander managed to close it out to force a decider.

The vital moment of a nervy third set came when Paolini broke in the eighth game, before serving it out confidently despite falling 0-30 down.

President Donald Trump has called the FIFA World Cup referee who sent off U.S. striker Folarin Balogun in last week’s match against Bosnia-Herzegovina “very suspect” as the controversy over the American’s red card grows.

Speaking at the White House Monday ahead of the U.S.’s last-16 clash with Belgium, where Balogun will now be allowed to play after his one-match ban was effectively lifted, the president said: “I saw the play, and I’m a person that loves sports… That wasn’t a foul.

“That wasn’t even an infraction. This referee, who is a little bit suspect if you check his past. He made a call that nobody could believe. He’s our best player, or one of our best players. And he gave him a red card. I didn’t know what that meant… Yes, I asked for a review by FIFA.

“I didn’t know what the hell a red card was. When I found out, I said, ‘You gotta be kidding!’”

He went on to deny that he had set a destructive precedent for the tournament by making a political intervention before veering off into discussing basketball star Caitlin Clark and the “rather rough” treatment the Indiana Fever player is often subjected to on court.

“I thought our young, wonderful basketball player – Caitlin – I thought she was treated rather rough, if you want to know the truth,” Trump said.

“That was a much different kind of an event. That was a pretty bad event.”

Looking ahead to the U.S.’s knock-out tie with Belgium later, the president concluded: “If they beat us, they can be really proud. The other way, if they beat us, we’ll say – I say it was rigged, just like the election was rigged in 2020, but I won’t get into that.”

The president’s baseless attack on Brazilian official Raphael Claus, who oversaw last week’s 2-0 win for the U.S. over Bosnia in San Francisco and ejected Balogun for a foul on defender Tarik Muharemovic in the 64th minute. The red card saw Balogun not only out for the rest of that game but also suspended for the American’s next clash. That was until FIFA moved Sunday to grant the striker an almost unprecedented reprieve.

Trump called FIFA President Gianni Infantino – who last year awarded him the inaugural “FIFA Peace Prize,” inviting widespread derision – lobbying him to intervene on Balogun’s behalf.

FIFA obliged, explaining its decision in a statement that read: “In line with Article 27 of the FIFA disciplinary code, the implementation of the match suspension is suspended for a probationary period of one year.

“If Folarin Balogun commits another infringement of a similar nature and gravity during the probationary period, the suspension shall be revoked and the sanction enforced without prejudice to any additional sanction imposed for the new infringement.”

Trump took to Truth Social on Sunday to thank the federation for “reversing a great injustice” – his first meaningful involvement in the World Cup, having attended none of the games so far despite the U.S. being one of the co-hosts, alongside Canada and Mexico.

Secretary of State Marco Rubio had previously said the U.S. “got screwed” by Balogun’s sending off, signaling official displeasure.

Secretary of Commerce Howard Lutnick and Andrew Giuliani, executive director of the White House’s World Cup Task Force, also privately reached out to FIFA over the matter, according to reports.

While the development has been welcomed by U.S. manager Mauricio Pochettino and playmaker Christian Pulisic, many observers have been more inclined to agree with Belgium’s manager, Rudi Garcia, who said: “I didn’t know that at the World Cup the 5th of July is actually the first of April. It’s April Fools.

“We’re not defending the national team or the federation, we are defending football, integrity. It’s the first time in World Cup history that such a decision has been taken.”

The Royal Belgian Football Association said it was “astonished” by the rule-bending, given that there is no appeal process in place to challenge bookings at the tournament, and Europe’s governing body UEFA said FIFA had “crossed a red line” and made an “unjustifiable” decision.

European pundits reacted with even greater disdain.

Gary Neville said on the U.K.’s ITV Sunday that Balogun’s exemption from the rules “absolutely stinks,” while on the BBC, Wayne Rooney said: “If I’m the USA’s opponent, I’d be absolutely fuming. I think it’s wrong in every way. I think it’s an absolute disgrace.”

Others have warned that the affair could tarnish the on-field achievements of Pochettino’s side, who began their campaign with a thrilling 4-1 win over Paraguay in which Balogun scored twice and went on to win Group D.

Donald Trump and Gianni Infantino (AP Photo)

US President Donald Trump has confirmed that he personally spoke to FIFA president Gianni Infantino and asked him to review the red card and one-match suspension handed to Team USA striker Folarin Balogun during the FIFA World Cup match against Bosnia and Herzegovina. The suspension was later lifted, allowing Balogun to feature in the United States’ Round of 16 match against Belgium, a decision that has triggered widespread debate.USA are scheduled to take on Belgium in the Round of 16 clash at the Seattle Stadium in Seattle on Monday (5:30 am IST). When asked by a reporter, “Can you describe your phone call with Gianni Infantino about the red card? Belgium is appealing the decision,” Trump confirmed that he had spoken to the FIFA president.Here’s what Trump said:I did. I spoke to Gianni, who’s highly respected, who’s produced the most successful World cup in history by, they say, four times.This isn’t just a success. I actually said, johnny, we’ve got all these games. Each one is turning out to be a Super bowl, and we have all these games. You know, when you think of it, every game is like a Super Bowl.Yes. I watched last night what a game that was with Mexico and England. I mean, two countries. I don’t know the players, although I think Kane is a great player. See, I played golf with him, and I like him a lot. He’s a good golfer, but he’s really great.But I watched and no reason for me to watch. And you couldn’t take your eyes off the game because I said, johnny, you know, you have all these games because they added games in a country where really we don’t. It’s not our main sport, to put it mildly.And this has been four times more successful. He told me last night, the numbers are four times greater. They think 50 or 60 million people are going to be watching the game tonight. I mean, these are getting to be super bowl numbers.But you have a game tonight, and they think they’re projecting a minimum of 50 million people watching a game. We call it soccer. It’s called football, I guess, but we can’t really call it football because it gets a little. There’s a little confusion. So, yeah, you call it soccer. We’re the only ones that do that, but we have football, and football is great, but I’ve never seen anything like it.So I saw the play, and I’m a person that loves sports and was a good athlete. And I understand sports really well. Really well. And that wasn’t a foul. That wasn’t even an infraction.That was two guys running full speed that happened to crash into each other. You can’t take your foot and properly place it on somebody else’s foot when you’re going, no. These were two great athletes that got tangled up.And this referee, who. Is it a little bit suspect? If you check his. If you check his past. I don’t want to say that because I don’t like to create controversy, but. But very suspect. If you’d like, I’ll provide you with the past.He made a call that nobody could believe. You know, even people on the other side, they say, oh, we got lucky. Wow, that’s.And it’s very interesting. They say they don’t show them in slow motion. And I never realized that I’d never heard of that before, that they’re not allowed to review in slow motion because it’s so different, because you’ll take one little quarter of a second and you’ll see that a hand is touching a neck or you see something.Whereas when you see it in fast motion, it will look like two guys collided, which is really what happened. They got sort of entangled. He didn’t do anything wrong, and he’s our best player, or one of our best players, a very vital player.And he gave him a red card. I didn’t know what that meant. I didn’t think it meant much. Then I started hearing that that means he can’t play in the next game. At least in the next game.I said, boy, that’s a big. You know, if it happened to another player, it would have been unfair. But when they take your best player, or just about, they have some great players, but. And they say you can’t play, that’s very unfair.That’s. You know, it’s one thing to penalize somebody for the game, but how do you penalize them for a game that hasn’t been played yet? It’s very unfair. You can’t do that.So, yes, I asked for a review by FIFA. I spoke to a man who’s highly respected and, by the way, whose level of respect has gone up tenfold.

Folarin Balogun red card: What exactly happened

Balogun, the American top-scored in the tournament with three goals, received a red card for stepping awkwardly on the right ankle of Tarik Muharemovic of Bosnia-Herzegovina in a 2-0 round of 32 win on Wednesday, triggering an automatic one-game suspension.FIFA announced Sunday that the suspension had been lifted for the round of 16 match, an extraordinary move that triggered praise from Trump and outrage from Belgium’s team. It appeared to be the first time since 1962 that a red card during a World Cup did not result in a suspension.“Thank you to FIFA for doing what was right, and reversing a great injustice!” Trump later said in a statement on social media.The Royal Belgian Football Association (RBFA) said it was “astonished,” and Belgium coach Rudi Garcia mocked FIFA’s action.“I didn’t know that in the offices of FIFA the fifth of July was the first of April in Europe,” Garcia said through a translator in an April Fools’ Day comparison. “The Belgian federation does not defend itself, it does not protect the national team. She defends football in general, she defends her integrity, her ethics. I think it’s the first time in the history of the World Cup that there is this kind of decision.”FIFA said its decision relied on Article 27 of disciplinary committee rules.“The judicial body may decide to fully or partially suspend the implementation of a disciplinary measure,” the rule states. “By suspending the implementation of the sanction, the judicial body subjects the person sanctioned to a probationary period of one to four years.”

David Benavidez has outlined his strategy to face an inferior opponent, collect another title and negotiate a more lucrative deal with Al Haymon’s PBC.

‘The Mexican Monster’ comes off a sixth-round finish over Gilberto Ramirez, who he dethroned for the WBO and WBA cruiserweight titles in May.

In doing so, Benavidez became a three-division world champion and cemented himself as a top 10 pound-for-pound operator, while still holding the WBC strap at 175lbs.

The 29-year-old has therefore afforded himself several options for his next outing, which seems likely to be against WBC cruiserweight champion Noel Mikaelian.

It was initially reported that Mikaelian, who comes off a unanimous decision victory over Badou Jack in December, would be facing Zuffa champion Jai Opetaia later this year.

Since those talks commenced, though, Benavidez has become the WBC mandatory challenger at 200lbs, seemingly attempting to torpedo negotiations between Opetaia and Mikaelian.

In any case, the Mexican-American has told Luis Parra that he expects to secure a three-belt unification match, which would signify the final fight on his promotional contract with PBC.

“Right now, I have to be very smart with my fights, because this is the last fight on my contract with PBC. I’m negotiating a new contract. I don’t want to take the hardest fight in the last fight of my deal.

“What I am going to do is fight another champion at cruiserweight, and after I win that fight, I’ll have [one world title] at light-heavyweight and three titles at cruiserweight. That gives me more leverage to negotiate a bigger contract.”

While Mikaelian represents a solid opponent, Benavidez has previously expressed his desire to face Dmitry Bivol in a far more appealing undisputed light-heavyweight clash.

But if both champions keep hold of their belts at 175lbs, then perhaps this matchup could be explored at some point in 2027.