Connect with us

Sports

Morocco and Senegal await AFCON final verdict after arbitration hearing – Sports

Published

on

J24 AFCON FINAL 2

J24 AFCON FINAL 2

Thursday saw the Court of Arbitration for Sport hold a long-awaited hearing in Lausanne, as sport’s highest court considered Senegal’s appeal over the decision to award Morocco this year’s Africa Cup of Nations title. While Senegal won the match on the pitch in Rabat 10 months ago, the Confederation of African Football later overturned the result because the Lions of Teranga had left the pitch in protest mid-game before coming back on. The three-judge panel is expected to issue a verdict soon.

Club football returns from a three-week break with some Ligue 1 action on Friday night, as high-flying Lyon travel to face a struggling Lens side who have faced backroom upheaval.

A’ja Wilson was crowned MVP of the WNBA regular season for a record-extending fifth time, following a season in which the Las Vegas Aces centre led the league with a points average of 26.2.

In tennis, Mirra Andreeva needed two tie breaks to edge past her compatriot Ekaterina Aleksandrova and into the China Open semi-finals in Beijing. Her next opponent, Nikola Bartůňková, sprung a surprise by breezing past Karolína Muchová in the all-Czech quarter-final tie. 

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Sports

Multiple Power Four programs face College Sports Commission investigations over alleged NIL cap evasion

Published

on

cfp

cfp
Between five and 10 schools, including multiple College Football Playoff contenders, face scrutiny over third-party arrangements designed to skirt spending limits

Source link

Continue Reading

Sports

Arsenal statement adds to Man City misery after guilty 115 verdict

Published

on

1 Mikel Arteta Enzo Maresca and Arsenal

Manchester City have been rocked by news of their guilt in the 115 case but there are more concerns for Enzo Maresca and his players

It has been a miserable few weeks for Manchester City and their fans. The club that sits on top of the Premier League table after five games has been thrown into turmoil with publication of a 40-page decision from an independent panel that find City overwhelmingly guilty in the 115 case.

Rivals are so delighted that nobody is even pretending to get angry about that Elliot Anderson handball shout against Sunderland last month because the consequences of the expert verdict will be catastrophic. City are appealing and insist they have irrefutable evidence, but their chances of success cannot be too high given that evidence has already been categorically refuted.

Advertisement

And in the months it takes for that to happen, City’s guilt will be talked about on a daily basis. Premier League club executives are discussing – under the cover of anonymity, of course – what punishments they would want to see the Blues face and points deductions are being gaily speculated on.

Enzo Maresca and his players have to shut out all of that noise and concentrate on trying to win two football matches a week, starting at Anfield on Sunday. But even as the players try to keep calm and carry on, their rivals are also ploughing ahead.

Premier League champions Arsenal have been publicly silent on the guilty verdicts with the process ongoing, but on Wednesday they announced a new contract for Mikel Arteta. Already the longest serving manager in the division by some distance following the departures of Jurgen Klopp and then Pep Guardiola, the former City assistant is now signed up at the Emirates until 2030.

Advertisement

In a statement announcing the news, CEO Richard Garlick said: “We want to create a winning era together with Mikel… Mikel has the belief, determination and the understanding of what it takes to build something remarkable and enduring here, and we are excited to continue that journey together.”

As City’s golden era is tainted, the last thing they want to be hearing about is the start of another one in North London. And, despite a 3-0 defeat for the title favourites at Brighton before the international break, it is Arsenal who remain the team to beat for City and any of the chasing pack, with the stability at the club giving them a critical advantage.

FOLLOW OUR MAN CITY FB PAGE! Latest news and analysis via the MEN’s Manchester City Facebook page

The punishments handed out – or not – to City at the end of the appeal process will determine how far the gap to the very top is, but in the meantime they have to keep making progress under Maresca to stay as competitive as they want to be. As difficult as it might seem with so many pitchforks out for City, Arsenal’s commitment to Arteta is a reminder that there are more than just guilty verdicts for City to be concerned about.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Sports

Asiad selection row: Para-shooters allege corruption; PCI denies claims | Asian Games 2026

Published

on

1791442583 638

Para-shooters have sought an urgent independent inquiry into alleged financial corruption, extortion and manipulation in the selection process for the Para Asian Games, prompting the Paralympic Committee of India (PCI) to reject the charges and insist that the team was picked entirely on merit.

In a representation to the Director General of the Sports Authority of India (SAI) on Wednesday, the shooters alleged “illicit monetary extortion”, “brazen corruption” and violations of Sports Ministry’s guidelines by PCI officials and its Shooting Technical Committee (STC) in selections for the Aichi-Nagoya Para Asian Games, scheduled from October 18 to 24.

The representation alleged that athletes were being pressured to pay a 20 per cent commission from government cash awards as a precondition for selection, while also accusing officials of manipulating international quota places and qualifying scores to favour certain shooters.

 

Advertisement

“Athletes are being coerced under severe duress into paying an illegal kickback of 20 per cent of their sanctioned government cash awards to designated committee office-bearers as a mandatory pre-condition for national team selection,” the representation alleged.

The shooters further claimed that international wild-card slots were allocated on the basis of financial considerations rather than ranking and performance, and alleged that two of the 15 international quota places available to India were surrendered because the next-ranked athletes refused to meet the alleged financial demands.

They also accused the selection committee of discarding prescribed Ministry criteria, manipulating qualifying scores and replacing an earlier selection panel without recorded justification.

According to the shooters, the representation questioned the appointment of an individual as a technical expert and Director of Operations despite having no record of participation in an official competitive shooting event.

Advertisement

Sandeep Kumar, a P4 50m free pistol SH1 shooter ranked third in Asia, alleged bias in the selection process. He claimed Rudrankksh Khandelwal, ranked 14th in Asia, was selected ahead of Akash, the Asian No. 1, and himself.

Sandeep said he was “deeply aggrieved” by what he described as arbitrary decisions and violations of the selection rules.

PCI president Devendra Jhajharia, however, rejected the allegations, maintaining that the selection process was transparent and based entirely on the prescribed criteria.

“The selection has been done as per the criteria. There has been no discrimination against anyone. The selections are 100 per cent fair and according to the Sports Ministry’s guidelines,” Jhajharia, a two-time Paralympics javelin gold-medallist, told PTI.

Advertisement

He also denied Sandeep’s allegation that he had been dropped in favour of a shooter with links to the coach.

“Those are all false allegations,” Jhajharia said.

The shooters, meanwhile, have warned that they could seek judicial intervention if the allegations are not addressed, saying they would consider approaching the High Court under Article 226 of the Constitution for a writ of mandamus and a court-monitored investigation.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Sports

Southampton’s Eckert Spared Ban as FA Suspends Six-Week Sentence Over Spygate

Avatar photo

Published

on

spygate

TITLE: Southampton’s Eckert Spared Ban as FA Suspends Six-Week Sentence Over Spygate
KEYWORD: spygate
DESCRIPTION: Southampton boss Tonda Eckert avoids a touchline ban despite three Spygate rule breaches, as the FA hands him a suspended sanction and £28,000 fine.

Southampton manager Tonda Eckert will remain in his job after an independent FA commission suspended a six-week ban handed to him over the club’s Spygate scandal, fining him £28,000 but sparing him the touchline exile that threatened to end his tenure before the season had properly begun.

The ruling, delivered on Wednesday, closes one chapter of a saga that has followed Southampton since last season, when the club was found to have orchestrated covert surveillance of training sessions belonging to three Championship rivals. The Football Association’s independent regulatory commission concluded that Eckert, 33, had committed three breaches of FA Rule E3.1, but opted for leniency after what it described as his “genuine contrition” and the risk that a lengthy ban would cost him his job.

The FA had pushed hard for tougher punishment. Its lawyers initially floated a ban of “at least nine months” — drawing a comparison to the 12-month suspension given to Canada women’s coach Bev Priestman over drone spying at the 2024 Olympics — before scaling that back to three months. The commission instead calculated a starting point of 16 weeks before mitigation, then suspended the resulting six-week ban until the end of next season. It remains to be seen whether the FA will challenge the outcome; the governing body has not yet said whether it intends to appeal.

Advertisement

inline 7

How the Spygate affair unfolded

The roots of the Spygate controversy lie in Southampton’s promotion push last season. Eckert admitted arranging for staff to observe an Oxford United training session to establish whether the opposition were lining up with a back four or a back five, and conceded he had accepted video footage filmed at an Ipswich Town session, though the commission accepted he had not personally commissioned that particular act. Most seriously, he sent someone to watch Middlesbrough train ahead of their play-off semi-final to check on the fitness of midfielder Hayden Hackney — an episode that blew up into public view when a Southampton intern was confronted by Middlesbrough staff at the scene.

Southampton went on to beat Middlesbrough over two legs and reach the final, only for an EFL independent disciplinary commission to rule that the espionage amounted to “a contrived and determined plan from the top down to gain a competitive advantage.” That panel expelled Southampton from the play-offs altogether, denying them a shot at a Premier League return worth an estimated £200m, and imposed a four-point deduction carried into this campaign. An appeal against that punishment was rejected just two days before the final, which Hull ultimately won against Middlesbrough at Wembley.

Against that backdrop, Wednesday’s FA verdict stood out for its markedly different tone. Where the EFL panel branded Eckert’s conduct “deplorable” and said it was “unimpressed” with his evidence — also finding that junior staff had felt pressured into carrying out the surveillance — the FA’s commission reached starkly different conclusions. It called Eckert “a particularly impressive witness,” found no evidence he had pressured subordinates, and rejected any suggestion of a “systemic or organised course of conduct” within the club.

Contrition cited as decisive factor

Central to the lighter sanction was the commission’s acceptance that Eckert did not realise his actions breached EFL rules, and its view that his remorse — including consulting a psychologist to understand how his conduct had affected staff around him — was “as deep and meaningful as could reasonably be expected.” The panel stressed that spying on an opponent remains “a very serious offence,” while noting that observing training outside a defined pre-match window is not itself prohibited.

Advertisement

Southampton welcomed the ruling, saying in a statement that it hoped the decision would bring “a conclusion to a regrettable period of our history” and that safeguards were now in place to prevent any repeat. Owner Dragan Solak went further, praising the FA process as “a positive experience” while taking a swipe at the EFL, saying the way the league had treated the club “is not something we will forget.”

Solak also offered a strong endorsement of his manager, calling Eckert “one of Europe’s most exciting young coaches” and expressing confidence that, with the Spygate cloud lifted, he can lead Southampton to a successful season. Eckert took interim charge when the club sat 21st in the Championship, guided them to a fourth-placed finish, and was rewarded with the permanent job in December 2025.

Southampton currently sit 13th in the Championship with four wins from eight matches, and face south-coast rivals Portsmouth this weekend. The suspended ban means Eckert can continue in the dugout provided he avoids any further spying-related breach before the end of the 2027-28 season — a condition that leaves the Spygate affair hanging over the club, even as it tries to move on.

Related reading:
Advertisement
Sources:
Continue Reading

Sports

Enzo Maresca all smiles as Man City return to training after guilty verdict

Published

on

IndependentMembershipWhite

Enzo Maresca cut a relaxed figure as he greeted the cameras at Manchester City‘s training ground on Thursday.

The Manchester City boss was photographed grinning and offering a thumbs up as the squad came back together following the extended international break.

Friday will bring the manager’s first press conference since the club was found guilty on multiple charges of breaking Premier League financial rules across a nine-year period.

Manchester City have insisted they are innocent and have submitted an appeal, but speculation has been rife across football about the sanctions they might face.

Advertisement

A febrile atmosphere is expected at Anfield on Sunday, when City face fierce rivals Liverpool.

Manchester City manager Enzo Maresca gives a thumbs up (Martin Rickett/PA)
Manchester City manager Enzo Maresca gives a thumbs up (Martin Rickett/PA) (PA Wire)

Maresca will hope his players can put the furore to one side and pick up where they left off in the Premier League, having won all of their opening five matches to sit top of the table.

Manchester City are currently three points clear of defending champions Arsenal, while they hold a six-point advantage over Liverpool heading into Sunday’s clash.

Manchester City’s fixtures list does not get any easier as they are due to face two-time Champions League winners PSG at the Etihad Stadium next Wednesday.

Former Manchester City boss Pep Guardiola, who has publicly iterated his support of the club after the verdict was announced, is understood to be attending the Champions League game with PSG next week.

Advertisement

In a statement released last week, Guardiola wrote on social media: “I want every single Manchester City fan across the world to know I am here; more than ever,” he wrote on Instagram.

The Man City squad is back in training after the international break
The Man City squad is back in training after the international break (PA)

“I am, always have been, always will, be behind my club, my owner, my chairman, Ferran, the players, staff, Enzo and you, our unique supporters.

“Let me be clear: we will get through this together. I love you all.”

Manchester City have responded to the verdict by doubling down on their innocence, saying they were “both disappointed and surprised by the opinion of the Premier League Commission” in a statement.

The club says they have “a comprehensive body of irrefutable evidence” that supports their position and will be “relentless” in their appeal.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Sports

Saracens’ Venter Brands Premiership Rugby ‘Autocratic’ Over £5,000 Media Fine

Avatar photo

Published

on

brendan venter

Brendan Venter finally faced the media on Wednesday, and when he did, he had plenty to say about why he’d rather not. The Saracens technical director and head of culture used a rain-soaked press conference at the club’s St Albans base to accuse Premiership Rugby of behaving like an “autocratic land” after the league fined the club £5,000 for his refusal to perform interview duties.

It was a strange, meandering audience that moved from one-word answers to meditations on Ukraine, Gaza, winemaking and a recent motivational talk at a school — vintage Brendan Venter, in other words, for anyone who remembers his combustible first spell in charge of Saracens fifteen years ago.

Brendan Venter’s return and the media standoff

Venter came back to Saracens full-time this summer, initially presented as the heir apparent to Mark McCall as director of rugby. That framing didn’t last: the club clarified last week that Venter’s actual title was technical director and head of culture — briefly, bizarrely, “wine consultant” — with head coach Joe Shaw handling the bulk of pre- and post-match media work.

The friction with Premiership Rugby stems from Venter’s absence at a pre-season media day at Twickenham, where Shaw, Maro Itoje and Noah Caluori all showed up without him. The league responded with a £5,000 fine, a decision Venter clearly still resents even after giving a pre-match interview to TNT Sports ahead of Saracens’ defeat to Sale.

Advertisement

“I have the desire as a human being not to want to talk, because it’s not supposed to be about me, it’s about a team, and I expressed that desire before I came,” Venter said. “I’m not the director of rugby of this club. This club does not have a director of rugby. This club has an unbelievably competent head coach in Joe.”

Why Brendan Venter says the fine makes no sense

Venter was unambiguous about where he thinks the blame lies. “If we get obsessed and we get into an argument and we fine a club, that for me does not make sense,” he said. “It sounds like something we do in an autocratic land, in a country, not in a democracy where people have got the right to say: ‘This is not what I want to do.’”

He insisted his reluctance has nothing to do with arrogance or a belief he’s above the press pack. “To be put over as an arrogant person that thinks he’s better than interviews, it’s not at all that. My motivation is completely different. It’s how do I just get on with my job and help coaching this rugby team.”

This isn’t the first time Venter has clashed with rugby’s disciplinary machinery. His original stint in charge at Saracens was marked by run-ins over his outspokenness, including the infamous “biscuit-gate” episode and an interview in which he deadpanned “three cheers for Sireli Bobo” rather than engage with a question seriously. That history, he says, is precisely why he wanted to keep a low profile this time around.

Advertisement

“It stole my joy the previous time,” he said. “I wanted to have a low profile. That was my desire. I want to coach or help coach the rugby team. I do not want to be doing interviews. And it’s not because of you or anybody else.”

He framed his outlook in blunt, almost clinical terms: “At my age, we actually look at life and go — I call them joy givers and joy stealers. There are things that give me joy and I do more of them. There are things that steal my joy and I cut them out of my life. And that was one of the things that took my joy.”

A reluctant return built on love of the game

So why come back at all? Venter, a qualified doctor who has practised as a GP in Cape Town, said it was the pull of coaching and the sheer complexity of rugby that brought him back when Saracens owner Dominic Silvester asked. “Rugby is very much like wine making,” he said. “When you get arrogant or too confident, you’ll not make a great wine. It’s exactly the same with rugby. It keeps you humble.”

He also put the stakes of his profession in perspective, invoking global conflicts to argue that sport’s pressures, however real, pale against genuine hardship. “Nobody has died,” he said. “That’s an unbelievable privilege. That happens in far more high stake environments like Ukraine and the Gaza Strip where people are actually dying because of their challenges.”

Advertisement

Whether Premiership Rugby will soften its stance remains to be seen. For now, Venter says he’s resigned to facing further sanction rather than compromising on his principles. “I am going to be authentic,” he said. “And then I am going to have to go to Dublin and sit in some hearing and get a €10,000 fine. So I just want to prevent that.”

For a figure who insists he wants nothing more than a quiet return to coaching, Brendan Venter has once again found himself at the centre of rugby’s conversation — not through results on the pitch, but through a standoff over who gets to speak for Saracens, and on what terms.

Related reading:
Sources:
Advertisement
Continue Reading

Sports

Internationals make history with emphatic Bridges Cup win at Trump Turnberry | News

Published

on

Bridges Cup 2026 Final Round copy.webp

Bridges Cup 2026 Final Round copy

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Sports

Cristiano Ronaldo vs Jorge Jesus row: All that has happened so far | Football News

Published

on

1791361468 7557

The fallout between Portugal forward Cristiano Ronaldo and head coach Jorge Jesus took a new turn after Ronaldo accused the manager of breaking his word and presenting a false version of events in a 1,740-word statement issued to Portuguese media.

 

Ronaldo, 41, apologised to his teammates and supporters for leaving the Portugal camp midway through the Nations League fixtures but provided a detailed account of the events that led to his decision.

 

Advertisement

He claimed Jesus had promised him 30 minutes against Norway on September 27, only to leave him on the bench for the entire match. Ronaldo also alleged that, after the game, he and Jesus agreed on how the incident would be explained publicly, but that the coach later failed to honour that understanding.

 

 

Despite the bitter dispute, Ronaldo said he would not retire from international football and remained available for Portugal after serving any punishment imposed by the federation.

Advertisement

How the Ronaldo-Jesus row began

Ronaldo said he had supported the decision to appoint Jesus as Portugal coach after Roberto Martinez’s departure, describing it as the right choice.

 

According to Ronaldo, he later met Jesus and Simao Coutinho, the sporting director at his Saudi Pro League club Al Nassr, to discuss his role in Portugal’s four Nations League matches against Wales, Norway, Denmark and Norway.

 

Advertisement

Ronaldo claimed Jesus initially proposed that he would play in the first and fourth matches while not travelling to Norway and Denmark for the second and third fixtures.

 

The Portugal captain said he rejected the proposal because he did not believe it would set the right example for him to miss a national team trip even if he was not expected to play.

 

Advertisement
On the day of the Norway match, however, Ronaldo said Jesus changed his plans and told him that he would play for 30 minutes. Ronaldo said he accepted the decision despite it being outside his physical recovery and training plan. 

Ronaldo left on the bench against Norway

Despite the alleged agreement, Ronaldo remained an unused substitute as Portugal beat Norway 2-1. Ronaldo said Jesus had failed to keep his word and admitted that he was frustrated after the match.

 

He also acknowledged that he made a mistake by not going over to greet the supporters, apologising to Portuguese fans and those who had travelled specifically to watch him.

 

Advertisement

Jesus later explained that he had decided against bringing Ronaldo on because the circumstances of the match had changed and he no longer believed it was the right moment to introduce him. The explanation did little to settle the situation.

Ronaldo claims second meeting was held

Ronaldo said he, Jesus and Coutinho held another meeting 48 hours after the Norway game. He described the conversation as frank and said the three men agreed that Jesus would address the controversy at a press conference and explain what had happened.

 

According to Ronaldo, the agreed version was that he had never demanded playing time, that his schedule had been decided by Jesus and that it had been a mistake to make him warm up without eventually bringing him onto the pitch.

Advertisement

 

Ronaldo said a short document summarising what Jesus was expected to say was prepared, approved by him and handed to the coach. He also claimed Jesus ended the meeting by hugging him and promising to give that version of events to the media.

Ronaldo accuses Jesus of breaking his word

Ronaldo said he was subsequently disappointed by the way Jesus addressed the matter publicly. He described the coach’s approach as aggressive and said he did not deserve the tone adopted by Jesus.

 

Advertisement

The forward said the situation convinced him to leave the Portugal camp rather than wait for what he considered another breach of trust. Ronaldo stressed that his dispute was not about interfering in the coach’s tactical or technical decisions.

 

He said he had never attempted to influence such decisions during his international career and had always accepted what Portugal managers asked him to do.

 

Advertisement

However, he added that when a coach broke his word to him, he felt that his place was no longer there.

Ronaldo apologises for leaving Portugal camp

While making strong accusations against Jesus, Ronaldo accepted responsibility for his own actions.

 

He apologised to his teammates and Portugal supporters for leaving the camp after the Norway match.

Advertisement

 

Ronaldo said his behaviour should be assessed by the Portuguese Football Federation and that he would accept whatever punishment was imposed.

 

He also claimed that he had previously given Jesus and the federation an opportunity to tell him that his services were no longer required. According to Ronaldo, both responded that his place remained with the national team.

Advertisement

Ronaldo to not retire from international football

The dispute also raised questions over whether Ronaldo’s departure from the camp could mark the end of his Portugal career.

 

Ronaldo made clear that he was not retiring from international football. He said he hoped to have one or more farewell matches for Portugal in the future, while insisting that his immediate focus remained on competing for the national team.

 

Advertisement

Ronaldo revealed that he had actually drafted a letter announcing his international retirement but was persuaded to abandon the idea by Portuguese Football Federation president Pedro Proenca during a flight back from the United States.

 

He said that, provided he remained physically fit and continued playing for his club, he would be available for Portugal after serving any suspension that may be imposed.

What Pedro Proenca said

The Portuguese federation has attempted to frame the dispute as a misunderstanding. Proenca said the disagreement between Ronaldo and Jesus was a “misunderstanding” and indicated that the forward could return to the national team.

Advertisement

 

He said the federation, coach and player would need to sit down and calmly find the best solution after the completion of the Nations League fixtures.

 

Proenca also reiterated that Ronaldo remained part of Portugal’s plans and would be available to the manager when required.

Advertisement

What happens next

Ronaldo’s statement has now put his version of the dispute firmly into the public domain. The forward has apologised for leaving the camp, accepted the possibility of punishment and denied that he intends to end his international career.

 

At the same time, his accusations against Jesus have added another layer to an already tense relationship between the Portugal captain and his coach.

 

Advertisement

The next step will depend on how Jesus and the Portuguese Football Federation respond to Ronaldo’s claims and whether the three sides can resolve the dispute before Portugal’s next international assignment.

Source link

Continue Reading

Sports

‘Nobody can stop Bumrah and Bhuvneshwar’: Ashwin’s bold prediction as pacer makes India return after four years | Cricket News

Published

on

bhuvneshwar kumar
‘Nobody can stop Bumrah and Bhuvneshwar’: Ashwin’s bold prediction as pacer makes India return after four years

NEW DELHI: Former India spinner Ravichandran Ashwin believes Bhuvneshwar Kumar’s return to international cricket could open the door for a remarkable comeback to India’s ODI squad and potentially take the veteran pacer to next year’s 50-over World Cup in South Africa, Zimbabwe and Namibia.Bhuvneshwar, who returned to India colours after nearly four years when he was picked for the upcoming five-match T20I series in New Zealand, last played an ODI against South Africa at Paarl in 2022.Ashwin feels the selectors will be watching Bhuvneshwar closely in New Zealand and that a successful series could immediately put him in contention for the ODI side ahead of the World Cup.“He is going to New Zealand now. I am telling you, if he does well, everyone will immediately say, just take him for the ODI team as well. The selectors will be watching very closely,” Ashwin said on his YouTube channel.

‘Nobody can stop’ Bumrah-Bhuvneshwar combination

Ashwin went a step further, saying Bhuvneshwar’s ability to swing the ball and maintain decent pace could make him a valuable option in conditions in South Africa and Australia.“If he swings the ball and shows decent fitness, nobody can stop Jasprit Bumrah and Bhuvneshwar Kumar from sitting together on that flight to the World Cup, with Bhuvneshwar bowling the first ball of the World Cup,” said Ashwin.The 36-year-old seamer has played 121 ODIs and taken 141 wickets. His ability to move the ball both ways, particularly with the new ball, is a skill Ashwin believes could be particularly useful in conditions where seam and swing can play a major role.“Do you want swing? He has swing. If you want it to move one way, he can do that. If you want it to move both ways, he can do that too. And then he has decent pace,” he added.Bhuvneshwar’s recent performances in the IPL have also strengthened his case for an international comeback. He played a key role in Royal Challengers Bengaluru’s back-to-back IPL titles, taking 17 wickets in the 2025 season and 28 in 2026.

Ashwin highlights one major concern

While Ashwin remains bullish about Bhuvneshwar’s skill set, he stressed that fitness could be crucial if the pacer is to extend his international career and push for a place at the World Cup.“I am once again putting my neck on the line to say this: if he had worked a little harder, if the timing had been right and if he had avoided those injuries, with the skill set he possesses, he could have been a king for India across all formats,” he said.Apart from 21 Tests and 121 ODIs, Bhuvneshwar has played 87 T20Is and taken 90 wickets. His return also gives India another experienced seamer alongside the likes of Jasprit Bumrah, while potentially offering guidance to younger pacers such as Mayank Yadav and Prince Yadav.India will play five T20Is against New Zealand later this month before the tour moves into the ODI and Test phases, giving Bhuvneshwar an immediate opportunity to make a case for a longer international comeback.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Sports

Rivals Demand Man City Face Both Retrospective and Future Punishments Over Financial Breaches

Avatar photo

Published

on

man city punishment

The debate over Manchester City punishment has escalated, with a growing number of Premier League clubs demanding that any sanctions go far beyond a simple points deduction, sources have told the BBC. An independent commission recently found City guilty on all charges relating to breaches of the Premier League’s financial regulations spanning the 2009-10 to 2017-18 seasons, and rival executives are now pushing for a reckoning that covers both the past and the future.

City have lodged an appeal against the verdict, but behind the scenes a consensus is forming among at least four top-flight boardrooms that the eventual punishment, should the appeal fail, must do two things simultaneously: make reparations for the years City broke the rules, and meaningfully restrict the club’s operations going forward.

Why a one-off Man City punishment won’t satisfy rivals

Central to the frustration among clubs is the fear that a single, one-season points deduction resulting in relegation would amount to little more than an inconvenience for a club of City’s resources. Given their financial muscle, many executives believe City would simply bounce back to the Premier League at the first opportunity, treating relegation as a “bump in the road” rather than genuine consequence.

inline 39

As a result, several club figures are advocating for any Man City punishment to be spread across multiple seasons rather than delivered in one hit. Suggestions include points deductions staggered over several campaigns, as well as transfer bans extending across multiple windows, which would do more to blunt City’s ability to rebuild quickly and reassert their dominance.

Advertisement

One club source went further, telling the BBC it would be “bizarre, almost obtuse” if City were allowed to trade freely in the January transfer window while the sanctions process remains unresolved.

Calls to strip titles, not redistribute them

Perhaps the most striking demand circulating among rival clubs concerns City’s trophy haul. One senior club source argued that City should lose the honours won during the period covered by the guilty verdict, including eight Premier League titles, warning that the competition’s credibility would suffer if City were permitted to keep silverware earned while breaking financial rules.

Notably, there appears to be little enthusiasm for redistributing those trophies to other clubs. Instead, the preference voiced by at least one executive was to vacate the titles altogether rather than hand them to whichever side finished second. That said, BBC Sport has also been told that appetite for stripping titles is not universal, and opinions across the league remain divided on this particular element of any Man City punishment.

A “tariff-based” approach to compensation

Among the more technical proposals gaining traction is a so-called tariff-based system, under which City’s historic league finishes would be recalculated as if points deductions had applied at the time. Rival clubs could then seek financial compensation based on the difference between where they actually finished and where they would have finished had City been correctly sanctioned during those seasons.

Advertisement

One club source said they found “merit” in this approach, suggesting it could offer a more precise mechanism for reparations than a blanket penalty, and could help address complaints from clubs who feel they lost out on prize money, European qualification or other financial benefits because of City’s rule-breaking.

Frustration over timing and transparency

Beyond the substance of the punishment itself, several clubs expressed frustration at being kept “in the dark” about the Premier League’s handling of the process, particularly around the chronology of City’s appeal and the eventual sanctions hearing. Even so, sources indicated there was “empathy” and “understanding” for the difficult position the Premier League finds itself in, given both the scale of the case and the ongoing legal complexities.

The debate over the appropriate scale of Man City punishment comes against a backdrop of continuing football matters for the club itself. Manager Enzo Maresca is expected to address his squad collectively once players return from international duty, ahead of City’s Premier League trip to Liverpool, their first match since the verdict was announced. Merseyside Police confirmed it has received queries about the fixture and said an “appropriate policing operation” would be in place, while sources at Liverpool described preparations as “business as usual,” with no extra measures planned beyond the usual pre-match arrangements between clubs, supporters and authorities.

For now, City’s guilt has been established, but the shape of their punishment remains unresolved. With clubs pushing for a combination of retrospective reparations and forward-looking restrictions, the final outcome could reshape not just City’s immediate future but the Premier League’s approach to financial discipline for years to come.

Advertisement
Related reading:
Sources:
Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2025