Connect with us

Sports

UEFA set for emergency meeting on FIFA World Cup proposal

Published

on

Several media outlets reported on Thursday that UEFA had called an afternoon meeting of its 55 members to discuss a response to FIFA’s plans to create a new commercial subsidiary valued at $20 billion (roughly €17.5 billion) and sell a non-controlling minority stake of it to investors.

UEFA, European football’s governing body, came out publicly in opposition to the plan within an hour of it first being reported by the Financial Times and Times on Monday.

Shortly after the newspaper reports, FIFA, the sport’s global governing body, issued a statement in which it confirmed the plan. In a later statement, it gave FIFA’s 211 member associations until September 19 to express their written support for the scheme. The proposal requires  a simple majority and approval from the FIFA Council to pass. 

UEFA doubled down on its criticism after learning of the deadline, saying: “Today we have learned of FIFA’s deadline to associations to support their proposals or have the one-off payout offer withdrawn. This says everything ​you need to know about this plan.

Aleksander Ceferin
Aleksander Ceferin’s UEFA has been at loggerheads with FIFA for some timeImage: Mike Egerton/PA/picture alliance

 It added that talks with many stakeholders showed that “there is significant and growing opposition to FIFA’s scheme. FIFA cannot to use our sport to enrich themselves and their friends.”

DFB: FIFA plan ‘problematic and unacceptable’

Germany’s mass-circulation Bild paper reported that key UEFA officials including German FA (DFB) President Bernd Neuendorf had already discussed the FIFA plans via a video call on Wednesday.

Advertisement

“We must not lose the fans’ support, but we are well on the way to squandering that,” he told public broadcaster ZDF afterwards. “I consider this to be extremely problematic and unacceptable,” he added.

“If UEFA rejects this request (for approval of the plan), then it is dead, because I believe that you won’t be able to find any investor who would be willing to go ahead with this project if UEFA is out.”

Bernd Neuendorf
Bernd Neuendorf can’t see the FIFA plan going forward without UEFA on boardImage: Ulrich Wagner/picture alliance

Other critics have expressed fears that the deal could lead to more tournaments, teams and matches to increase revenue and boost the value of investors’ stakes.

UEFA hasn’t been the only confederation to criticize the report. CONCACAF, responsible for North and Central America, as well as the Asian Football Confederation (AFC) have also expressed concerns that the proposal was made public without their consultation while the African confederation (CAF) have said they will discuss the plans next week. Members of the FIFA Council, including Neuendorf, have said they were not consulted on the latest proposal.

Advertisement

FIFA: Subsidiary could raise billions ‘this year’

FIFA has said the new subsidiary, to be known as FIFA Forward Enterprise (FFE) would be valued at $20 billion and that it would aim to raise up to $4.2 billion “this year” by “carefully selecting long-term investors who will purchase minority, non-controlling interests” in the company. FFE would be responsible for FIFA’s commercial rights like broadcast, sponsorship, ticketing and licensing contracts. By far the most valuable of these are those linked to the World Cup,

Under the ​plan, FIFA said it could make $10 billion available for development beginning in 2027. Each federation would be eligible for up to $20 ​million in one-time Fast Forward funding, in addition to $20 million through the regular FIFA Forward program during the 2027-30 ⁠cycle. Without ​approval, FIFA projects a development package of about $2.7 billion.

Infantino: ‘A golden opportunity’

In face of the opposition, FIFA President Gianni Infantino released a video on Wednesday evening, describing the project a “golden opportunity to turbocharge the development of the game globally.”

He added that the proposal was “part of a democratic process” and in comments directed to football fans, he stressed that “the sport they watch and love will not change.”

Advertisement

Edited by: Matt Pearson

Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Sports

End of baseball or fair trade from a serious role-model team?

Published

on

Detroit Tigers ace Tarik Skubal is arguably the hottest commodity ahead of this year’s trade deadline. The speculation around Skubal’s future in Detroit started last season when he had one year left on his contract.

The speculation intensified earlier this year before his historic arbitration case, where the two-time Cy Young winner negotiated a record-shattering $32 million salary for the season.

With Skubal reportedly on the table in his final year of contract, the Los Angeles Dodgers have emerged as the strongest suitor. The Dodgers’ interest in Skubal has once again sparked the controversial narrative about the two-time defending World Series winners “ruining” baseball.

The Dodgers’ interest in one of the best players in the league has become a norm over the years. The NL West team has acquired several high-profile names, including two-way phenom Shohei Ohtani on a record-breaking $700 million deal, over the last few years.

Ohtani’s massive deferred contract also raised questions about the Dodgers bending the rules in their favor. However, the Dodgers have been shrewd with their contract deals and have utilised the massive local revenue to build a star-studded team.

The Dodgers’ massive contracts, including a four-year, $240 million deal for Kyle Tucker in January, have the fans asking for a salary cap. While the league proposed a salary cap, the Major League Baseball Players Association has opposed the hard cap.

Will a trade for Skubal make the Dodgers the favorites for athree-peat? Yes. But will it guarantee success? No. Despite their star-studded roster, the Dodgers were pushed to the limits by the Toronto Blue Jays in the World Series last year.

Advertisement

The Dodgers’ model might seem unfair to smaller market teams, but their schemes should only encourage other team owners to spend more money for a competitive roster.

Dodgers emerge as favorites for Tarik Skubal ahead of trade deadline

The Dodgers’ aren’t the only team interested in Tarik Skubal but they are front-runners to land the two-time Cy Young winner because of their deep and talented farm systems.

Despite the narrative that the Dodgers are competing only because of their big signings, their talented prospects allow them to move for a high-profile players who is set to become a free agent after the season.

While the Tigers will lose their best player after failed extension negotiations, they will shed his remaining $9.5 million salary and drop below the $244 million competitive balance tax line.

Advertisement