Connect with us

Sports

Will John Mateer’s added muscle make him a worse Oklahoma QB?

Published

on

Just about every player enters training camp saying they’ve never felt better and they’re in the best shape of their life. In the case of Oklahoma quarterback John Mateer, seeing is believing. 

Mateer turned heads over the summer at the Manning Passing Academy in late June for a noticeably more muscular physique. He kept the conversation going by posting multiple shirtless pictures on Instagram: 

There was chatter in social media circles, Reddit — “is that kind of muscle good for throwing?” — and on a few podcasts that Mateer’s strapping physique would affect the fluidity and mobility of his throwing motion. 

“Is John Mateer too jacked?” Tom Fornelli asked, perhaps with a scoop of sarcasm. “I don’t know if I want my QB being too big … I’m not trying to get a body-builder quarterback. When you’re that big, you’re too tight. How are you supposed to unleash a throw down the seam with that — he’s got his pecs getting in the way!” 

Advertisement

Below is our attempt to discern whether bulking up could have any impact on how Mateer will steer the Sooners offense through the air. 

We asked an expert  

Mateer had an up-and-down 2025 season marred by a hand injury suffered in a late September game against Auburn. He returned in time to face Texas in the Red River Rivalry but was a diminished version of himself as a passer for most of the rest of the season until late in the year.

In the offseason, he began working out with his offensive linemen and has put on anywhere from five to 10 pounds. He enters fall camp at a listed 224. Oklahoma did not respond to a request to speak to Mateer, his QB coach or the Sooners’ strength and conditioning coordinator. 

Pat Powers is throwing out any theory that Mateer added bad muscle this summer. 

Advertisement

A former Northern Illinois football analytics staffer, high school football assistant coach and sports science researcher for Driveline Baseball and the NFL, Powers says from a kinematic perspective the concept of Mateer’s bulk inhibiting his ability as a passer could not be further from the truth. 

“Yeah, that’s false,” Powers said. “Basketball is a good example where if you see guys say lifting is going to make you less flexible, it’s completely untrue. It doesn’t bear out in reality. And also, any decent training program is going to take that into account and work on mobility, flexibility, and that type of fitness.”

Mateer is not even the heaviest QB in the SEC, but he may be the most ripped. 
Instagram: John Mateer

Mateer’s listed weight isn’t in any way an outlier. Arch Manning is listed at 222, Gunner Stockton is 215 and Byrum Brown in 235. If Austin Mack wins the starting job at Alabama he’d be the heaviest starting QB in the SEC at 237 pounds. According to Powers, getting bigger can actually help Mateer.  

“Different players are going to adapt differently, and it’s not typically like oh, you put on five pounds, your elbow flexion is going to fall, or your shoulder abduction is going to decrease,” Powers said..” It changes player to player, and that’s some of where like the kind of ecological dynamics comes in, where a lot of skill adaptation is learning to how your body changes, which is why there’s such things as like de-loading weeks and lifting programs, where you’re taking a week for your body to recover and kind of adapt to the changes its made. 

Advertisement

“So it’s not quite a one-to-one of like this happened, so this happened. It’s more a balance of general and specific training because all the weightlifting stuff is what’s known as general fitness, and then when you get to like the actual throwing exercises, that’s specific. So it’s basically improving your general fitness gives you more capacity to both practice more and have raw inputs to improve the specific skills.” 

Ground force = rotational force 

Mateer is a former baseball player. In fact, he skipped offseason 7-on-7 football camps as a high schooler to play on the diamond. You can see the baseball background in how he throws a football – his throwing motion is much more sidearm almost as if he’s a shortstop turning a double play. But zeroing in on Mateer’s arm at all can lead you down the wrong rabbit hole. 

While you may think that throwing a baseball is one-to-one with throwing a football, consider that there is much more overlap with hitting. This was applicable to another OU quarterback years ago, Kyler Murray, who was drafted by the Oakland A’s before opting to go to the NFL. Murray told The Oklahoman “I can throw a football all day and my arm doesn’t get tired,” …”If I throw a baseball more than a certain amount of time, it’s going to get a little sore.”

The reason why has to do with what exactly is happening when a quarterback throws a football, as explained by quarterback guru Yogi Roth. 

Advertisement

“We got a phrase that we use at Elite 11 all the time: ‘Ground force equals rotational force,’” Roth shared during a 2015 conversation. “[Murray] has a lot of that. If you think of a baseball player when they swing, and the way they generate force with the bat or when they generate force even throwing, it’s the same as a quarterback.”

Many famous quarterbacks with the types of throwing style you might remember like Brett Favre, Aaron Rodgers or Dan Marino aren’t actually doing much work with their arms. They’re using more of their core to draw rotational force from the ground and essentially fire it up through their bodies and the ball shoots off their hands almost as a byproduct. The right hip is doing most of the work. 

This also makes Mateer different from a similar example of a swole passer people had concerns about, Tim Tebow, whose arm strength wasn’t in doubt but his accuracy was because of a long, looping throwing motion. The pitfall of Tebow’s for was that it was too “armsy,” using too much of his upper body, rather than an efficient lower body. Here’s a scouting report on Tebow (who played around 235 pounds) from NFL.com:

“Release is far too slow to fit balls into spots against NFL defensive backs. Release point and mechanics (elongated, wind-mill delivery which comes out too low) likely need to be altered.” 

So what should you make of tarps-off Mateer? 

Nothing much beyond, the odds are he looks like he’s in much better shape than you do.

Advertisement

It doesn’t mean he’ll be too tight to go deep to Isaiah Sategna or Parker Livingstone. In fact, because Mateer runs the ball so much it might help him hold up to the wear and tear in the SEC. But there’s a lot that goes into the training and coaching of being a refined passer in the SEC, and 10ish pounds of muscle isn’t going to automatically ruin him. 

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Sports

Yashasvi Jaiswal vs Virender Sehwag

Published

on

There will be high expectations from opener Yashasvi Jaiswal in the upcoming two-match Test series in Sri Lanka. India need to win both the Test matches in the island nation to keep their faint hopes of reaching the World Test Championship (WTC) final alive.

Jaiswal is fourth on the list of India’s leading run-getters in the 2025-27 WTC cycle. In nine Test matches (17 innings), the southpaw has scored 713 runs at an average of 41.94, with three hundreds and as many half-centuries. The Indian opener was dismissed for a duck in the first innings of the practice match in Colombo, but scored 61 off 46 in the second innings before retiring.

Jaiswal has opened the innings in 29 Tests so far (54 innings). Ahead of the Sri Lanka series, we compare his stats with those of Virender Sehwag after the latter had also opened the batting in 54 innings.


Jaiswal vs Sehwag – Who has more runs and a better average as opener after 54 innings?

In 54 Test innings as opener Jaiswal has scored 2,535 runs at an average of 48.75. In 10 Tests against England, the 24-year-old has scored 1,123 runs at an average of 62.38. In five Tests against Australia, he has 391 runs at an average of 43.44. Also, in four Tests against the West Indies, Jaiswal has scored 485 runs at an average of 80.83.

After 54 Test innings as opener, Sehwag had scored 2,930 runs at an average of 56.34. In six Tests against Pakistan, he had scored 982 runs at an average of 98.2. In nine Tests against Australia, he had scored 846 runs at an average of 49.76. Also, in two Test matches against South Africa, he had 262 runs at an average of 87.33.


Jaiswal vs Sehwag – Who has more hundreds as opener after 54 innings?

Jaiswal has smashed seven hundreds and 13 half-centuries in his Test career thus far. He slammed two double hundreds against England during the home series in 2024 – 209 in Visakhapatnam and an unbeaten 214 in Rajkot. Earlier, the left-handed batter had scored 171 on debut against the West Indies in Roseau in July 2023 and a memorable 161 against Australia in Perth in November 2024.

Advertisement
Player Runs Average HS 100s 50s
Yashasvi Jaiswal 2,535 48.75 214 7 13
Virender Sehwag 2,930 56.34 309 9 8

(Jaiswal vs Sehwag – Stats comparison after opening in 54 innings)

After 54 Test innings as opener, Sehwag had nine hundreds and eight half-centuries to his credit. His best at that stage was an epic 309 which came against Pakistan in Multan in March 2004. He had also scored 201 against Pakistan in Bengaluru in March 2005 and 195 against Australia in the 2003 Boxing Day Test.


Jaiswal vs Sehwag – Who has a better record in wins after opening in 54 innings?

In 14 Test wins (24 innings), Jaiswal has notched up 1,644 runs, average of 71.47, with six tons and six fifties. In 12 losses (24 innings), he has scored 730 runs at an average of 30.41, with one ton and five fifties. In three Tests (six innings) that ended in a draw, he has totaled 161 runs at an average of 32.20, with the aid of two half-centuries.

Player Innings Runs Average HS 100s 50s
Yashasvi Jaiswal 24 1,644 71.47 214* 6 6
Virender Sehwag 19 984 54.66 309 2 3

(Jaiswal vs Sehwag – Stats comparison in wins after opening in 54 innings)

Advertisement

In 13 Test wins (19 innings), Sehwag had scored 984 runs at an average of 54.66, with two hundreds and three half-centuries. In nine losses (17 innings), he had 902 runs at an average of 53.05, with two tons and four fifties. In 10 drawn Tests (18 innings), he had 1,044 runs at an average of 61.41, with the aid of five centuries and one half-century.


Jaiswal vs Sehwag – Who has a better away record after opening in 54 innings?

In 14 away Tests (27 innings), Jaiswal has scored 1,118 runs, averaging 43, with four hundreds and five half-centuries. In 15 home Tests (27 innings), the left-handed batter has scored 1,417 runs at an average of 54.50, with three centuries and eight half-centuries.

Player Innings Runs Average HS 100s 50s
Yashasvi Jaiswal 27 1,118 43 171 4 5
Virender Sehwag 28 1,362 50.44 309 3 4

(Jaiswal vs Sehwag – Away stats comparison after opening in 54 innings)

In 18 away Tests (28 innings), Sehwag had scored 1,362 runs at an average of 50.44, with three hundreds and four half-centuries. In 14 home Tests (26 innings), he had 1,568 runs at an average of 62.72, with six tons and four fifties.

Advertisement