The robots glide across the floor, sometimes pausing to spin a quarter turn or two before resuming their route. They come close to one another but never collide. It’s not choreographed – they’re adapting on the fly – but the movement does have the feel of a ballet.
If ballet dancers were mechanized platforms on wheels, that is. Flat-topped and low to the ground, like oversized bathroom scales granted the gift of movement and the ability to navigate on their own.
These are Amazon’s Proteus robots in action.
Advertisement
In a spacious Amazon warehouse in London, as in its counterparts around the world, Proteus, Titan and fellow robots are perpetually tasked with fetch quests – finding and retrieving shelving units that contain items that all of us order day in and day out and bringing them to stations where those items are picked, packed and sent on their way.
Some of those days are busier than others – Prime Day sales, for example, when Amazon orders surge. During these periods, fulfillment centers bring on thousands more workers and the robots keep pace.
We visited two Amazon locations – the LCY3 London fulfillment center and the BOS27 robot development facility in Westborough, Massachusetts – to better understand the role robots play in ensuring our packages reach us at speed, both now and in the future.
After decades of humanity’s sci-fi-inspired preoccupation with robots, advances in AI (including large language models and vision language models) over the past five years are increasingly allowing robots to interact with people in more natural ways. For the most part, these real-world robots bear little resemblance to the pop culture depictions, particularly of the humanoid variety. Humanoids are starting to spring up, but most robots around us today are much closer to the type Amazon and other companies are using in industrial settings.
Advertisement
Proteus version two — coming soon to a fulfillment center near you.
Katie Collins/CNET
In Amazon facilities, the robots range from Proteus, which could be a Roomba’s more strapping younger sibling, to Vulcan, a robotic arm with a sense of touch that can pick up objects and understand what it’s handling. Altogether, Amazon has over 1 million robots operating in fulfillment centers, handling tasks such as stowing, picking, sorting and transporting.
Even though Amazon has been developing robots for years, it’s still only in the early stages of growing its robotics portfolio, said Tye Brady, Amazon’s chief technologist, speaking in London in early June.
Advertisement
What it’s learned so far is that robots make the environment safer, and therefore more efficient. In centers where robots have been deployed, Amazon has seen a 41% reduction in the number of accidents and a 40% increase in the amount of goods delivered.
“The efficiencies allow us to pass on a low cost to our customers,” said Brady. “The robotic systems allow us to store more goods physically closer to our customers as well.”
Over time, Brady added, the gradual introduction of robots is creating a powerful cycle within Amazon. “We deploy systems, we learn from them, we improve them and then we expand on what they can do for people,” he said.
That’s exactly what it’s done with Proteus, with a new version ready and raring to replace the existing model in fulfillment centers across the globe in the next few years.
Advertisement
Freewheeling Proteus robot gets language skills
Proteus is Amazon’s first fully autonomous robot – a “collaborative robot” designed to work and move around in the same spaces as humans going about their normal activities, not cordoned off behind fences with tightly restricted access for employees. It’s loaded with sensing and navigation capabilities.
“You just put them where the people are, or put the people where they are, and they’ll get right around you,” said Travis Hearn, a QA engineer at Amazon’s BOS27 facility, located 30 miles west of Boston along a once rural road now lined with low-rise industrial and commercial buildings. Cyclone fencing divvies up sectors of a cavernous space, where a diverse array of mobility and manipulation robots go through their paces.
The more diminutive demo area for Proteus, by contrast, is wide open, simulating the fulfillment center terrain it’s built to traverse, potentially several hundred meters from where chutes drop customer packages to where those packages get placed into delivery vehicles.
Advertisement
In a London fulfillment center, an Amazon mobility robot has slid under a rack that it’ll lift and tote across the floor.
Katie Collins/CNET
A Proteus robot – 7.8 inches tall, 31.5 inches long and 29.9 inches wide – can carry up to almost 900 pounds. That’s modest compared to what the larger, lookalike Hercules and Titan mobile robots can carry (1,250 and 2,500 pounds, respectively). Racks holding the goods for delivery get stacked on top, creating tall rectangles that scoot from one station to another.
But Proteus can be much more freewheeling than its fellow bots. It doesn’t need markers on the floor to know where it is or what route to follow. It learns its environment over time. It also recognizes when something – or someone – unexpected is in the way.
“You could think of it like an invisible force field, a bubble around the vehicle. So if somebody stepped in the way of the vehicle, then it would come to a safe stop or slow down,” Scott Dresser, Amazon’s vice president of robotics, said in an interview this week at BOS27. “The intelligence is to find and detect people and safely avoid them.”
Advertisement
The first-generation Proteus has been around for several years, and Amazon has a little over 4,000 of them at 25 sites. Earlier this month, the company introduced the Proteus 2, which gains natural language processing so that people will be able to direct it with voice prompts.
“What makes this possible is a new AI architecture that allows employees to interact with Proteus through natural language using advancements in our generative and agentic AI systems,” said Brady.
Amazon employees will be able to talk to the robot the same way they do their colleagues, including gesturing – with a casual, “Hey Proteus, could you take this to the corner of the building?” It will be able to figure out route planning and timing and then execute the task on its own.
The second-generation Proteus will be rolled out to Amazon facilities in the coming months.
Advertisement
Robots doing fulfillment work for Amazon orders
The new Proteus will be deployed at LCY3 in the first half of 2027. Meanwhile, Amazon robots are already an essential part of the furniture.
Situated in Dartford, right at London’s eastern-most point, LCY3 is a strategically located fulfillment center on the banks of the River Thames, serving the British capital and beyond. Here, Prime Day orders are picked, packed and shipped across the UK and Europe.
Last year Amazon invested $60 billion across Europe to grow its operations on the continent, and it has ambitious goals for improving delivery times. It’s growing Amazon Now ultra-fast delivery to 20-plus sites in the UK, and it’s accelerating same-day delivery by adding more than 25 sites across Europe this year.
“When we make delivery faster, we are not just moving boxes quicker,” said Mariangela Marseglia, vice president of Amazon European Stores, speaking at the London event. “We are giving people minutes, hours back.”
Advertisement
Faster delivery, she added, comes from working safer and smarter. This is where the robots come in.
Amazon is experimenting with different robotic systems for different tasks.
Katie Collins/CNET
To hit its delivery goals in Europe, Amazon is investing more than $10 billion to expand and modernize its fulfillment network with robotics across the continent over the next few years. Some of the robotics systems it’s putting in place have been built on suggestions made by Amazon employees, said Armin Cossman, the company’s vice president of operations for Europe.
Advertisement
A new system called Stark, for example, was the idea of an Amazon operations employees in Spain. It picks up huge crates from conveyer belts and places them onto trolleys – repetitive work that puts an enormous amount of strain on the human body. Stark is being piloted in Barcelona, but Amazon plans to bring it to at least 15 more sites across Europe by the end of 2027.
It’s the first successful deployment of collaborative robots in Amazon’s fulfilment network, said Cossman. “Employees work side by side with collaborative technology – the same space working together on the same process.”
On both of our visits to its sites, Amazon was careful to impress upon us that this human-robot collaboration is a key part of its robotics strategy. The company, which has been repeatedly accused of unsafeworkconditions in its warehouses and of looking to replace workers with machines, wanted us to know, and you to know, that its robots aren’t here to take its workers’ jobs – just to make them better.
Advertisement
Amazon’s Proteus robots can navigate safely around other robots and humans.
Katie Collins/CNET
“When people have a people versus machines mentality, I find that wrong,” said Brady. “I believe that people, when they have technologies as a tool set, that there’s nothing in this world that they can achieve.”
Amazon has upskilled 700,000 workers, he added, with many more to come. He also anticipates the creation of new jobs linked to robotics as Amazon’s portfolio evolves.
“Robots create jobs. Full stop. It’s a fact,” said Paul Miller, vice president and principal analyst at market researcher Forrester. “New jobs are created to maintain the robots, to manage the robots and to do the new work that’s made possible because automation has lowered the cost, improved the consistency or accelerated the delivery of the tasks people once performed.”
Advertisement
Still, some individuals will be adversely affected by the disruption, Miller added. Those people will need to be supported as they change careers to ensure they’re better off.
At LCY3, there were many workers stationed across the 2 million square feet of operating space, spread out across airy halls with natural light flooding in from the Thames-view windows. Many were packing deliveries or unpacking returns, and some were working with and on the robots.
One key role is that of amnesty responder, whose responsibility it is to rescue items that have fallen from the pods the Proteus robots whisk around. Fallen items are the main point of failure in the Proteus system. When something tumbles out of one of the shelving units, the amnesty responder hits a button and the entire ballet pauses to allow the human in the loop to retrieve the offending object. Only once they’ve exited the arena does the dance continue.
On rare occasions, Amazon acknowledged, a collision occurs. Usually this will result in the Proteus needing a new camera lens, courtesy of the mechanic that’s always on hand. Then it’s back to work.
Advertisement
What next for Amazon robotics
Amazon’s robotics capabilities are evolving fast.
Beyond the walls of its fulfillment centers are delivery robots, such as the Amazon Scout and Amazon Prime Air drone. The latter is already live at eight sites across the US. Meanwhile, the company is testing the service in Darlington in the UK.
The MK30 drone can deliver shoebox-sized packages, allowing Amazon to deliver from a range of 60,000 items within a two-hour window. With its six propellors, a redundancy that allows the drone to continue on even if one fails, it will hover above the ground and drop packages without damaging them (it can detect obstacles on the ground).
Advertisement
Amazon Prime Air is another of the company’s robotics projects.
Katie Collins/CNET
Meanwhile, today’s robots are the preliminaries for what comes next. No, not humanoids, like in Elon Musk’s fever dreams of swarms of Optimus robots doing factory jobs.
Amazon has more modest expectations, targeting somewhere between what it’s doing with robots today and what humanoids may eventually deliver. That could include merging the capabilities of its mobility (e.g. Proteus) and manipulation (e.g. Sparrow) robots. Dresser said Amazon sees paths to using some combination of those technologies.
“How can we move and manipulate in the same robot, and what does that look like? Because we think that that is where our operations are heading,” Dresser said. “I think we’re going to see some new, interesting form factors in the coming months that are going to be in our warehouses very quickly.”
Advertisement
It’s clearly a company learning in real time – designing robots to meet its specific needs, and then refining them based on how they perform when thrust into real-world situations. “The systems we’re building today,” said Brady, “are laying the foundation for what comes next.”
However, Notion urged users to export drafts and scheduled emails by September 21, since those won’t automatically carry over to an alternative app. Notion noted that users can also save their Notion Mail setups and “export your snippets and auto label instructions to use elsewhere.”
“If you have auto label set up in Notion Mail, you won’t have to rebuild it. Create a Custom Agent in a few clicks, and we’ll bring your existing rules over for you,” the X post explained. “And if you’re already running Notion agents to manage email, they’ll continue running. Your email connection in Notion stays in place.”
Organizations that relied on Notion Mail in a regulated environment might have to transition from Notion Mail earlier.
“If you rely on HIPAA coverage, you should plan to transition off Notion Mail by June 30, 2026,” Notion’s support page reads.
Advertisement
Skiff reportedly served 2 million users, giving rivals like Proton Mail a run for their money before the Notion acquisition. As a Gmail client that didn’t support end-to-end encryption, Notion’s AI-centric approach to email lacked the privacy focus that Skiff carried as an email provider. Still, Notion Mail was built with Skiff’s infrastructure and by former Skiff executives, making its impending demise feel like a sort of swan song for Skiff.
Although Notion is killing its Skiff-influenced email client, it may continue leveraging the human resources and other productivity ideas (around calendars and storage, for instance) gained through its Skiff acquisition as it tries to compete more strongly against rivals like Google Workspace. Notion, however, has strayed from releasing direct follow-up products to Skiff’s portfolio.
Jazz centennial campaigns can become a lazy excuse to wheel out the same greatest-hits package with a new hype sticker. Craft Recordings is taking a more credible route. Its Original Jazz Classics series will mark the 100th birthdays of Miles Davis and John Coltrane on August 14 with new vinyl editions of Cookin’ with the Miles Davis Quintet and Coltrane’s self-titled 1957 Prestige debut; two records that capture both men before history turned them into monuments.
Cookin’ documents Davis’ First Great Quintet—Miles, Coltrane, Red Garland, Paul Chambers, and Philly Joe Jones during the legendary 1956 Prestige sessions that also yielded Relaxin’, Workin’, and Steamin’. Meanwhile, Coltrane captures Trane’s first session as a leader, recorded at Rudy Van Gelder’s studio in May 1957, just as his unmistakable voice was beginning to emerge from the hard-bop crowd.
Both reissues will feature AAA lacquers cut from the original tapes at Cohearent Audio, 180-gram vinyl pressed at RTI, and Stoughton Tip-On jackets with obi strips; the same sensible formula that has made the revived OJC line one of the more reliable modern options for collectors who want the real albums, properly presented, without being asked to sell a kidney for a One-Step. Digital editions will arrive simultaneously in 24-bit/192kHz hi-res formats.
They also continue a busy run for OJC, which has recently returned Wes Montgomery’s Full House, Vince Guaraldi and Bola Sete’s From All Sides, Thelonious Monk’s Alone in San Francisco, The Young Lions, Lee Morgan’s Introducing Lee Morgan, and Bobby Timmons’ This Here Is Bobby Timmons to vinyl with the same core AAA, RTI, and tip-on-jacket approach.
Advertisement
Related Reviews:
Miles and Trane at Full Boil
There are jazz records that arrive carrying the weight of history so heavily that listeners forget to enjoy them. Cookin’ with the Miles Davis Quintet is not one of those records. Yes, it documents Miles Davis’ First Great Quintet with John Coltrane on tenor saxophone, Red Garland on piano, Paul Chambers on bass, and Philly Joe Jones on drums, but it still moves like a great band caught on a particularly historic night.
Recorded on October 26, 1956, at Rudy Van Gelder’s Hackensack studio, Cookin’ was drawn from the same pair of Prestige sessions that also produced Relaxin’, Workin’, and Steamin’. Davis had already signed with Columbia and needed to finish his Prestige obligations, but there is nothing contractual or dutiful about the results. The quintet had spent months refining this material on the road, and the sessions were approached much like a club set: little fussing, few second guesses, and enough confidence to make difficult music sound almost casual.
The album opens with “My Funny Valentine,” a beautiful reminder that Davis did not need volume or velocity to take command of a room. With Coltrane sitting out, Miles works against Garland, Chambers, and Jones with a measured, almost conversational sense of space. From there, the temperature rises quickly. “Blues by Five” has all the relaxed authority of a band that knows exactly where the pocket lives, while “Airegin” lets Coltrane begin to push against the tune’s hard-bop architecture with the restless energy that would soon define his own work.
Advertisement
The closing pairing of “Tune Up” and “When Lights Are Low” gives the full group room to stretch without ever losing the plot. Garland brings elegance, Chambers keeps everything grounded, and Philly Joe Jones drives the proceedings with the kind of alert, propulsive swing that makes lesser drummers sound like they are waiting for a bus.
Cookin’ is not Miles at his most radical, nor is it Coltrane at his most searching. That is precisely why it remains so essential. This is a great working band at the moment when its collective instinct, individual brilliance, and pure sense of swing were all firing at once.
Coltrane’s Coltrane: The First Step Toward a New Jazz Language
Before John Coltrane became the spiritual force behind Giant Steps, A Love Supreme, and some of the most searching music ever committed to tape, he was a gifted but unsettled tenor player trying to establish his own voice. Coltrane, recorded on May 31, 1957, at Rudy Van Gelder’s Hackensack studio, is his first album as a leader and it catches that voice coming into focus in real time.
The timing matters. Coltrane had spent much of the previous two years alongside Miles Davis in the First Great Quintet, including the 1956 Prestige sessions that produced Cookin’, Relaxin’, Workin’, and Steamin’. By the time of this date, he was no longer in Miles’ band and had begun the difficult work of rebuilding both his career and his life. Later that summer, he would join Thelonious Monk, beginning one of the most important short-term partnerships in jazz. But Coltrane is where the transition becomes audible.
This is not yet the relentless Coltrane of the early ’60s, but the hunger is already there. “Bakai,” written by Calvin Massey, opens with a slightly off-kilter, almost teasing arrangement before the band settles into a muscular groove. “Straight Street” and “Chronic Blues,” both Coltrane originals, reveal a player determined to stretch hard-bop language without throwing away its swing, blues feeling, or melodic discipline in the process.
The personnel shifts across the two sides. Red Garland, Paul Chambers, and Albert “Tootie” Heath bring some of the easy authority associated with the Miles Davis orbit to the first half, while Mal Waldron’s more percussive and angular piano work gives the latter half a different edge. Trumpeter Johnnie Splawn and baritone saxophonist Sahib Shihab add weight and contrast to several of the arrangements, but this remains Coltrane’s statement from beginning to end.
Advertisement
There are softer moments, most notably the elegant “Violets for Your Furs” and “While My Lady Sleeps,” yet even those ballads carry an underlying tension. Coltrane was not interested in pretty sounds for their own sake. He was already pushing through the chord changes with a directness and urgency that made clear he had far more on his mind than simply becoming another excellent tenor saxophonist.
Coltrane is not the finished monument. It is more interesting than that. This is the sound of an artist standing at the threshold, still rooted in hard bop but beginning to see a much larger horizon.
Although paperbacks are a much-loved aspect of the literary world, they are not really intended to last the decades the way that hardcover books are. Beyond the typical ravaged covers, paperbacks also tend to suffer from a warped spine, where the formally flat spine gets a definite inwards curve due to the ravages of moisture, temperature, failing glue and the passing of time in general. If this bothers you, then [Book Care Studio] shows a simple technique using which these spines can be flattened again.
All that you need for this approach are two cutting boards and two clamps to provide some clamping force on the book, along with a heat gun and some patience.
The book is clamped between the two boards with the spine sticking out. By putting said spine flat on e.g. a table and pushing on the opposite side while alternatingly briefly releasing the clamps, the spine can be forced into a flatter state. Without forcing this and then flipping the paperback sandwich around to heat the spine with the heat gun, the glue of the binding in the spine can then be softened sufficiently that a few of these push-heat cycles should be enough to straighten the spine.
Other than rebinding the book as for example public libraries are wont to do with a hardcover conversion of flimsy paperbacks, this simple approach should clean up a ratty-looking paperback collection. While one can definitely argue that half the charm of old paperbacks are the wrinkles, curves and intense smell of acidifying paper, it’s always good to have options like this at one’s disposal.
The Trump administration has reportedly asked OpenAI to stagger the release of GPT-5.6 over security concerns. The model will initially be offered to a small group of partners, with the government “approving access customer by customer during this preview period,” reports The Information. The request came from conversations with the Office of the National Cyber Director and the Office of Science and Technology Policy, the report said.
Both are well-regarded ATX boards with built-in Wi-Fi, and both represent meaningful savings if you’re mid-build or planning an upgrade. And both punch above their discounted price.
The two boards target different platforms entirely — one is AMD AM5, the other Intel LGA 1700 — so this isn’t a true apples-to-apples comparison. Think of them as two separate opportunities: one for Ryzen 7000/8000/9000 builders, and one for 12th/13th/14th Gen Intel builders.
Advertisement
Today’s top computer deals
More on the PRO X870-P WiFi — AMD AM5
At this price, the PRO X870-P Wi-Fi sits in an interesting spot: it’s the X870 chipset — AMD’s current-gen platform with full PCIe 5.0 support — at a price that previously would have bought you a mid-range B650 board. The X870 chipset brings wider PCIe 5.0 support and Wi-Fi 7 as a platform requirement (rather than an optional add-on), and AMD has committed to AM5 support through at least 2027, which means whatever Ryzen processor you pair with this board today will have a clear upgrade path for several years.
The connectivity package at this price is genuinely impressive. Wi-Fi 7 with its 320MHz channel width delivers noticeably lower latency and higher throughput than Wi-Fi 6E — the kind of upgrade you notice on a busy home network. The 5Gbps Ethernet port, USB4 at 40Gbps, and Thunderbolt 4 are the kind of specs that usually appear on more expensive boards. Three M.2 slots (including one Gen5) gives you flexibility for fast SSDs now and room to expand later.
MSI’s PRO series is positioned more toward productivity and professional use than the flashier gaming-branded boards, which means the design is restrained — minimal RGB, clean silver heatsinks, no aggressive aesthetics. Whether that’s a positive depends entirely on what you want your build to look like. Best Buy reviewers have praised it as straightforward to install and stable from the first boot, with multiple builders noting it’s working well with everything from Ryzen 7700X to the 9800X3D.
Advertisement
One honest note: the PRO X870-P is tuned more for stability and accessibility than aggressive overclocking. If you’re planning to push DDR5 kits to their absolute limits or run a flagship Ryzen 9 chip at sustained all-core maximum TDP, a higher-end X870E board would give you more VRM headroom. For the majority of builds — including enthusiast setups — it handles everything without issue.
More on the B760 Gaming Plus WiFi Gaming Motherboard
The B760 Gaming Plus WiFi is the more straightforward recommendation of the two — it’s a well-established board with a substantial real-world track record. The 840+ reviews on Amazon at 4.4/5 tell a consistent story: this board works reliably, installs without drama, and delivers good performance across a wide range of Intel builds.
Intel’s LGA 1700 platform supports 12th, 13th, and 14th Gen Core processors, which means there’s a wide choice of CPUs available at various price points — everything from a budget Core i3 to the Core i9-14900K. It’s worth noting that Intel has moved on to the LGA 1851 socket for its newest Arrow Lake generation, so this platform won’t support 15th Gen CPUs. That said, for builds centered on a 13th- or 14th-Gen processor, the B760 remains a very solid foundation.
Advertisement
Wi-Fi 6E built-in is a practical inclusion at this price — it saves you from buying a separate wireless adapter and keeps the build clean. 2.5 Gbps Ethernet provides fast wired connectivity for those who prefer a cable. Two M.2 Gen4 slots comfortably handle primary and secondary NVMe SSDs, and PCIe 4.0 x16 is more than adequate for any current GPU.
Reviewers have specifically praised the B760 Gaming Plus WiFi for its stability across sustained workloads — one reviewer noted it handled “AAA applications and multitasking effortlessly” over ten months of use without a single stability issue. The reinforced PCIe slots and robust VRM heatsinks contribute to a build quality that feels more substantial than budget Intel boards at a similar price.
Artificial intelligence is becoming an increasingly visible part of healthcare. From administrative workflows and clinical decision support to remote monitoring and wellness technologies, organizations are exploring how AI can help process information more efficiently and provide greater visibility into health-related data. Yet as adoption accelerates, one challenge continues to influence whether these technologies gain meaningful acceptance.
Trust has become a central issue in the broader conversation around artificial intelligence. The World Economic Forum’s Global Risks Report 2026 ranked misinformation and disinformation as the second most severe short-term global risk, while concerns about the adverse outcomes of AI technologies rose significantly in the report’s long-term outlook. As organizations introduce AI into increasingly sensitive areas, including healthcare, the findings underscore the importance of transparency, governance, and accountability in building public confidence.
Doug Benoit, CEO of FacialDx, believes trust begins with clarity. FacialDx is an AI-powered wellness intelligence company that uses facial analysis technology to identify visual biomarkers associated with wellness indicators and provide structured observations intended to support awareness. Benoit explains that users increasingly want to understand how conclusions are reached rather than simply receiving results.
Doug Benoit, CEO of FacialDx
Advertisement
“People want access to the information behind the outcome,” Benoit says. “Trust grows when organizations are willing to show the methodology, the data, and the reasoning that support what the technology is presenting.”
That expectation reflects a broader shift taking place across healthcare and technology. Organizations are facing growing pressure from regulators, providers, employers, and consumers to demonstrate how AI systems function, how data is managed, and where human judgment remains involved. “Transparency is no longer viewed as a supplementary feature,” Benoit notes. “For many stakeholders, it is becoming a prerequisite for adoption.”
Privacy represents an equally important consideration. Benoit explains that healthcare information remains among the most sensitive categories of personal data, which places significant responsibility on organizations developing AI-enabled solutions. Research shows that AI systems handling sensitive health information raise significant concerns around privacy, data protection, and the risk of data breaches, while also highlighting the importance of ensuring that AI supports rather than overrides the judgment of healthcare professionals. Benoit believes those considerations reinforce the need for strong governance, security safeguards, and clearly defined human oversight as AI becomes more integrated into health-related environments.
Benoit notes that conversations around AI have evolved considerably during the past several years. According to him, many organizations have moved beyond asking whether AI should be used and are now focused on understanding how it can be implemented responsibly within existing workflows.
“The concern we hear most often is not whether AI exists,” Benoit explains. “Organizations want to know how it integrates into what they already do, how information is protected, and whether the technology supports the people responsible for making decisions.”
Advertisement
Human oversight remains central to that discussion. He explains that while AI can help identify patterns, organize information, and improve efficiency, healthcare decisions often involve context, judgment, and interpersonal considerations that extend beyond data analysis alone.
Benoit believes AI should be viewed as a support tool rather than an autonomous authority. “Technology can help surface information faster and more consistently,” he says. “But people still need people. Human oversight provides accountability, interpretation, and the ability to apply professional judgment in ways that technology alone cannot.”
This distinction is becoming increasingly important as organizations define governance frameworks around AI deployment. “Successful implementation often depends on clearly establishing what a system is designed to do, what it is not designed to do, and how outputs should be interpreted within existing professional processes,” Benoit says.
For FacialDx, that philosophy shapes the company’s position within the healthcare ecosystem. Benoit emphasizes that the platform is intended to provide wellness intelligence and observational insights rather than diagnostic conclusions. According to him, maintaining clearly defined boundaries helps support responsible adoption while reinforcing the role of healthcare professionals in evaluating information and determining appropriate next steps.
Advertisement
He also points to governance and controlled access as important components of trust. “The goal is to make information accessible, understandable, and secure,” Benoit says. “People should know who can access their information, how it is being handled, and what safeguards exist around it.”
As AI continues to expand across healthcare, enterprise wellness, and telehealth environments, trust may ultimately become the factor that separates short-term experimentation from long-term adoption. Innovation remains important, but sustained success will likely depend on whether organizations can balance technological advancement with accountability, transparency, privacy protection, and human oversight.
Benoit believes the future of AI health intelligence will be shaped by that balance. “The organizations that earn trust will be the organizations that remain transparent, stay focused on their purpose, and use AI to support better decisions,” he says. “When innovation and accountability move forward together, people gain confidence in the technology and confidence in how it is being used.“
Xbox console prices are jumping $100 for the 512GB model and $150 for the 1TB models. Microsoft says it will discontinue the 2TB version of the Xbox Series X. Here’s the new breakdown of prices:
Series S 512GB: $500
Series S 1TB: $600
Series X 1TB digital: $750
Series X 1TB disc drive: $800
Microsoft’s blog post said the company spent several months working with suppliers, hoping to avoid another price increase. “Unfortunately, console storage and memory prices have increased by more than 2.5x, and we expect another doubling by the fall of 2027.” It noted that the the components crisis — which was also behind the latest price hike for Apple products — is hitting consoles particularly hard.
That same blog post introduced buy now, pay later and zero-interest financing options, which the company framed as “programs to make XBOX consoles more accessible.”
New products aren’t immune, either. On Monday, Valve revealed the price of its PC gaming console, the Steam Machine, which starts at $1049. The price tag shocked many gamers, as the company had telegraphed that its new hardware should be similarly priced as other home consoles when it was first revealed last November. Instead, it’s $150 more expensive than the PS5 Pro. Valve also hiked the price of its Steam Deck portable console last month.
Corporate America is hemorrhaging money through inefficient IT business processes, and Jay Roland, founder of Varex Solutions, believes that the industry is complacent about it. Technical debt, which is the accumulated cost of deferred IT fixes, misconfigurations, and other operational inefficiencies, is projected to cost US enterprises$2.41 trillion a year, costing $1.52 trillion to fix. With numbers this staggering, Roland argues that awareness, however, remains precariously low.
“The numbers projected only tell part of the story,” he says. “The struggles companies are going through are far greater than any figure on a slide. I’ve walked into organizations spending $251 million a year on IT and found $51 million of it being wasted, year over year, on problems they didn’t even know existed.”
Jay Roland
To address the bottlenecks he witnessed, Roland launched Varex Solutions. The company functions within a specific pressure point, in the gap where enterprises believe their IT is costing them, and what it is actually costing them. Headquartered in Nashville, Tennessee, Varex offers a suite of consulting services spanning ITSM (IT Service Management) platform implementations, maturity assessments, health optimization, and SLA practice guidance.
Advertisement
According to Roland, the company’s key commitment is to uncover bottlenecks, technical debt, misconfigurations, and workflow inefficiencies and then turn those findings into actionable improvements that help increase ROI. This is achieved by Varex’s proprietary technical debt calculator. The tool, he explains, requires just three inputs from a company: industry, employee headcount, and annual revenue.
From those three data points, Roland’s algorithm, which he notes is built on years of archetypal industrial modelling, is designed to autofill an entire financial landscape. The output is intended to encompass a cohesive analysis of expenditure, wasted resources, action steps, and return on investment.
Roland explains, “There’s no AI involved in this entire process. This is all algorithmically structured technical debt assessments. There’s no point in telling someone they’re wasting money unless you can show them how to stop. Otherwise, it’s just noise. When I give you a number, I can show you exactly how I arrived at it, and your own IT team can verify it.”
While most paths follow a direct pipeline shaped by education, Roland’s entry into the industry came through a side door, literally. In November 1999, he tagged along with a friend to a local internet service provider in Pontiac, Michigan, intending to play video games on the T3 line. Someone placed a broken computer on his desk and walked away. He started fixing it. “Ten minutes later, a manager walked by, glanced at the screen, and told me they’d put me on the payroll,” he recalls. “That was my entry into IT.”
He carried that resourcefulness through a career that moved in and out of the industry, through the dot-com crash, through a tech support subscription startup he co-founded, and through a chapter advancing a popular role-playing game that handed him the exact spreadsheet modeling skillset he would later need to build Varex. Roland identifies this as his defining professional trait.
Advertisement
“No matter what I do, I bring everything with me,” he says. “What started as projective analysis on character leveling in a Dungeons and Dragons-style game converted into using a spreadsheet software to optimize a quoting process, and eventually into the algorithms behind Varex Solutions. You never know when you’re going to need it.”
Roland recalls growing up with modest means, without the cushion of inherited privilege, and he frames that experience as the source of his refusal to accept inefficiency as simply the cost of doing business, which now shapes his work. “The same water that boils the egg softens the potato,” he says. “Different people react differently to the same circumstances. It was sheer will and determination that got me here, to make something, to give my children something.”
He rejects the common notion of walking into a boardroom with abstract consulting promises. Instead, Roland believes in handing executives a specific, verified number. He explains, “I show them: this is what you’re wasting, this is the proof, and this is how to fix it.” The calculator, he says, was built to close the distance between vague projections and hard accountability.
The resistance he often encounters tells its own story. “I once asked a CIO if I could help uncover $25 to $40 million a year in unnecessary IT spend,” he recalls. “But the response I received was one of indifference.” Roland believes this dynamic exists because uncovering decades of avoidable waste is a conversation most executives would prefer never to have. “Would you want to tell your CFO that you have been wasting tens of millions of dollars annually for all these years?” he asks.
Advertisement
The question Roland keeps returning to is a direct one: how bad does a problem have to get before the people responsible for it decide it’s actually a problem? How many misconfigurations have to stack up before the cumulative damage becomes unsustainable? That is the conversation Varex Solutions exists to propel forward, and on Roland’s timeline, it is already overdue.
Longtime Slashdot reader schwit1 shares a report from autoevolution: The U.S. Department of Commerce’s Bureau of Industry and Security denied Polestar an authorization under the Connected Vehicle Rule. Polestar will continue to sell its existing inventory of Polestar 3 and 4 crossovers in the United States and will continue to offer support to customers and access to its service network. But no new 2027 models will set wheels on American soil.
The Connected Vehicle Rule is a regulation that restricts the import and sale of vehicles equipped with Vehicle Connectivity Systems (VCS) and Automated Driving Systems (ADS) tied to foreign adversaries, primarily from China and Russia. Polestar is owned by Chinese auto giant Geely, which has also been the parent company of Swedish brand Volvo since 2010. However, Volvo has recently been granted authorization to sell connected vehicles in the United States.
The rule, set out by the Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS), classifies modern vehicles as mobile data centers and is designed to protect national security by keeping sensitive driver data and vehicle control systems out of the hands of foreign governments. Michael Lohscheller, Polestar CEO, confirms that the company is well aware that the automotive industry is entering a new phase, based on regional dynamics. So, Polestar will shift its strategy to its biggest market as it is preparing its exit from the U.S. market. The report notes that Polestar sold 5,384 cars in the U.S. in 2025, with 60,119 units sold globally.
Rent the Runway’s Mark Kenny discusses his role in software engineering and his experiences of working abroad.
“I’m born and bred in Kilkenny and went to college in UL where I studied computer systems followed by a masters degree and I left Ireland in 2005 after finishing college and moved to London,” Mark Kenny told SiliconRepublic.com.
Having moved in his 20s, Kenny, who is a software engineer at Rent the Runway, explained initially the plan was only to stay for a few short years. However, he said he was drawn in by “everything the city had to offer” and ended up staying for a total of nine years.
“At the time, there simply weren’t any jobs in graduate roles,” he said. “I finished my initial undergraduate degree just as the dot-com bubble burst and no one was taking on graduate positions. In order to buy time, I did a master’s degree but the tech sector was still barely in recovery, especially in Ireland.
Advertisement
“Most of my classmates were either heading abroad or taking roles unrelated to what we had studied. For me, London was the obvious option since it was close to home, a diverse job market, and a chance to explore different career options. It’s important to note that at the time, I didn’t think of it as emigrating, but just being a few years away from home before I came back.”
Here he discusses his return to Ireland and his current day to day.
What made you decide to come back?
My kids, mainly. My wife and I had our first child and spent a year in London and found it difficult. There was no safety net, no-one to pick up children in an emergency or help out in any other way.
Don’t get me wrong, London is a fantastic place to live, especially in your 20s, but we found it to be a different proposition once we were trying to put down roots and raise children. At the time renting, never mind purchasing a house in a decent area, was well beyond our means.
Advertisement
We wanted our children to grow up around family and to be in an environment where they could stay kids for as long as possible.
How did your current role come about?
After several years of running my own business, I was ready for a new challenge when I joined Rent the Runway last year.
Moving from a start-up environment into a larger corporate company was a significant change, but I have to admit, the people at Rent the Runway made the transition very smooth. During the interview process, it was refreshing to meet a team that really understood my somewhat diverse background and experience.
What does your work involve on a day-to-day basis?
My day to day involves working as a full-stack engineer within a small Ireland-based team. It’s great having the entire team here in Ireland, as it helps foster strong collaboration and close working relationships. I work as part of the larger growth pod that has teams both here in Galway as well as our head offices in Brooklyn, New York.
Advertisement
What do you like most about your job?
The role itself is very varied, which is something I really enjoy. On any given day I might be working on front-end user experiences, back-end services, integrations, or improving internal tooling and performance. A big part of the role also involves collaborating with product managers, designers and other engineers to plan features and refine requirements, which gives me valuable insight into different areas of the business and how other teams operate.
Working in a smaller team also means there’s a strong sense of ownership. We’re involved throughout the full development life cycle from discussing ideas and technical approaches, to implementation, testing, deployment and monitoring after release. That level of involvement keeps the work interesting. What really stands out though is the people.
How did your employer make it easier for you to move back?
My case is slightly unusual as by the time I joined Rent the Runway, I’d already been back in Ireland for a few years, running my own company. So the practical move home was something I’d organised for myself.
When I moved back I worked remotely so now having flexibility around hybrid working is amazing. There are other nice perks of the job too like half-day Fridays during the summer.
Advertisement
How did your time working abroad make you better suited for your job?
While living in London I had the opportunity to explore several different career paths.
I worked as a recording engineer, which involved dealing with some very interesting, and often complex personalities. I also worked as a lecturer and managed a college campus before eventually starting my own business, where I designed and built software systems from the ground up.
Each role brought its own unique challenges and learning experiences. During that time, I worked alongside some extraordinarily talented people and learned how to adapt to a wide range of environments and industries. That combination of hands-on engineering experience and real commercial exposure has been genuinely valuable in a role like this, where thinking beyond just the code itself is an important part of the role.
What is the best thing about being back in Ireland?
99s and curry chips.
Advertisement
But beyond that, it’s definitely the lifestyle, without question. Raising children close to family and old friends, having more space, a sense of community, these are things you really notice once you’ve lived without them for a while.
The tech scene has also transformed beyond recognition since I left. Now Ireland has some of the best engineering opportunities in Europe, with major global companies based here and a thriving start-up ecosystem alongside them. With the rise of hybrid and remote work, you also have the freedom to live in some of the most beautiful parts of the country while still building a strong career.
What advice would you give to others thinking about moving back to their home country?
Don’t wait for the perfect moment, it doesn’t exist.
It’s also much easier to move home when you have fewer ties, so before kids start school or before you become more established in the housing market. If possible, keeping your existing job and negotiating remote work can make the transition much smoother too.
Advertisement
It’s also important to understand the cost of living changes, when we moved back, USC was a completely new tax for us.
Don’t miss out on the knowledge you need to succeed. Sign up for the Daily Brief, Silicon Republic’s digest of need-to-know sci-tech news.
You must be logged in to post a comment Login