TL;DR
Apple’s iOS 27 Siri app will auto-delete chats after 30 days or one year. After a two-year delay, it may still ship as a beta.
Apple’s iOS 27 Siri app will auto-delete chats after 30 days or one year. After a two-year delay, it may still ship as a beta.
Apple’s first standalone Siri app, coming in iOS 27, will include an auto-delete function for chat histories that borrows from the Messages app. Users will be able to configure the app to retain conversations for 30 days, one year, or indefinitely. The feature, reported by Bloomberg’s Mark Gurman in his Power On newsletter on Sunday, is designed to position Apple’s approach to AI privacy as structurally different from competitors that offer temporary or incognito chat modes as optional settings users must manually enable.
The Siri app will function as a chatbot akin to ChatGPT or Claude, serving as a repository for past conversations that users can search, continue, or delete. It can be accessed either through the standard Siri activation, via the side button or wake word, or through a new “Search or Ask” mode triggered by swiping down from the top centre of the screen. The app will support both voice and text input, file uploads, and web-sourced answers with images and bullet points. Users will be able to choose whether the app opens to a grid of prior conversations or a new chat each time.
The privacy architecture is Apple’s competitive differentiator, and also its excuse. Competing chatbots rely heavily on conversation histories and memory systems to personalise responses and improve over time. Apple is placing tighter limits on what information can persist and how long it is retained, building the restrictions into the system itself rather than offering them as optional modes. Meta launched a temporary chat feature just last week. Apple’s position is that such protections should not require users to opt in.
The strategic context makes the privacy framing more interesting than it appears on the surface. Apple has quietly replaced much of its own AI infrastructure with Google’s Gemini, paying roughly $1 billion annually for a custom 1.2-trillion-parameter model that will power the next-generation Siri. The company’s existing partnership with OpenAI is fraying, with OpenAI’s lawyers preparing possible legal action over a ChatGPT-Siri deal that failed to deliver the subscription revenue OpenAI expected. iOS 27 will introduce a system called Extensions that allows users to install rival AI chatbots and route Siri queries through whichever model they choose, including Claude and Gemini, effectively downgrading ChatGPT from a privileged partner to one option among several.
Gurman notes that Apple has been less specific about how the new Siri infrastructure will be hosted and operated at scale. The company has said the revamped Siri will use Private Cloud Compute, its extension of the iPhone’s security model into the cloud, but has not confirmed that it will rely on the same Apple-designed chips, data centres, and security architecture as the current system. The implication is that Google’s cloud infrastructure will handle some of the workload, something Apple does not want to emphasise given the tension with its privacy messaging.
The auto-delete feature is clever positioning regardless of whether the privacy argument is fully coherent. By defaulting to structured retention limits rather than permanent storage, Apple can claim its AI assistant is designed to forget, a contrast to systems that are designed to remember everything in order to improve. Whether users will value that distinction depends on whether they notice the trade-off: a Siri that forgets your preferences after 30 days is also a Siri that cannot learn from your history the way ChatGPT or Claude can.
Perhaps the most revealing detail in Gurman’s report is that the new Siri may launch as a beta, even after a two-year delay. The revamped assistant was originally scheduled for 2024. Test versions of iOS 27 within Apple currently use a beta label for the new Siri and include a toggle allowing users to opt out. Apple is simultaneously developing AI smart glasses for 2027 that will use the same Gemini-powered Siri as their primary interface, meaning the assistant needs to work reliably across multiple form factors by next year.
Gurman frames the stakes clearly: Tim Cook does not want his final launch as CEO to be a misstep. Apple got “some slack” with the original Apple Intelligence rollout in 2024, but the competitive and regulatory landscape has shifted. Google’s Gemini has grown its web traffic share from 5.7% to 21.5%. The EU is preparing to force both Apple and Google to open their AI assistants to rivals under the Digital Markets Act. Android 17, announced at Google I/O this week, will ship with a Gemini Intelligence system and a new Googlebook laptop platform. Apple is entering this environment with a Siri that is two years late, powered by a competitor’s model, and potentially still labelled as unfinished.
The Genmoji upgrade is the lightest piece of the iOS 27 picture but speaks to the same pattern. Apple’s AI-generated emoji feature was poorly received at launch: images looked nothing like the advertisements, and the models used so much power that phones would heat up and drain their batteries. iOS 27 will add “Suggested Genmoji,” automatically generated from a user’s photos and commonly typed phrases, in an attempt to increase adoption of a feature that was supposed to demonstrate Apple Intelligence’s consumer appeal.
Apple’s privacy argument arrives at a moment when the concept has never been more salient in consumer hardware. Meta is facing lawsuits and regulatory investigations over how its Ray-Ban smart glasses handle user footage. Google’s Android XR glasses will ship with cameras and Gemini AI. Snap is launching consumer AR specs with built-in AI. In this environment, an AI assistant that auto-deletes your conversations and does not train on your data is a genuine differentiator, provided the assistant itself is good enough that people want to use it. That is the question Apple has been unable to answer for 15 years. Whether Gemini, a beta label, and a privacy toggle change the answer will be clear by September.
The 1970s were a period of great change in the US car market, thanks to the oil crisis of the decade, which led to lower horsepower in cars. Many companies simply had to rethink how engines, gearboxes, and cars should be packaged. They began to prioritize efficiency in ways they hadn’t before, and one of the ways they did that was by shrinking car sizes and moving to front-wheel drive.
Mitsubishi saw the opportunity and took it. It launched a little hatchback in 1978 called the Mirage, and this car came with an odd engineering quirk. As highlighted by The Autopian, most rivals at the time were building transverse front-drive layouts, in which the engine is mounted sideways, with the gearbox bolted to the side. Mitsubishi decided to take a different route, though, and stacked the gearbox underneath the engine instead. This made the whole package narrower from side to side, making it easier to fit into the Mirage’s tight engine bay, and, as a result, freeing up more space for the wheels and cabin. But rather than simplifying things, the choice actually set off a cascade of quirks. At the end of that cascade sits the Twin-Stick transmission, as it was branded in some markets.
When the Mirage was being designed, its Orion inline-four engine sat with its carburetor facing the front of the car. Further testing revealed icing problems up there, and that’s what kicked off the cascade, as mentioned. The fix itself was simple: just flip the engine around so the carb faced the other way. Trouble is, turning the motor also reversed the direction the crankshaft spun, and that meant the wheels would now turn in reverse.
Normally, you’d solve that by slipping in a small idler gear between the engine and the gearbox to flip the rotation back the right way. But the engineering team saw an opportunity. If they were already adding a gear set to sort out the rotation, why not build a second ratio into it while they were at it? The result was two sticks paired together, a four-speed manual lever, and a second one sitting beside it. It was something no one else was offering at the time.
That second stick was a two-position lever, and when paired with the four-speed manual, it essentially gave drivers eight forward gears to choose from. The lever moved between Power and Economy modes, with a little indicator on the dashboard letting you know which one was active. The economy mode basically turned the car into a normal four-speed. Flick it over to Power, though, and the gear ratios immediately shorten, giving you punchier ratios for acceleration.
Power wasn’t just a crawler-style low range. Unlike the off-road high/low gearing on a 4×4, the gears under this mode still stayed tall enough to use all the way up to highway speeds. In fact, there were just a few hundred rpm separating the Power and Economy versions of each gear. The transfer case also worked in reverse, so you technically had two reverse gears at your disposal.
Because the rpm differences weren’t major, the performance boost wasn’t significant either. MotorWeek actually ran the turbocharged Colt GTS Turbo, a rebadged Mirage sold in North America, back in the day. They recorded a 0 to 60 mph sprint of 9.4 seconds in Power mode and 9.7 seconds in Economy, which, again, isn’t that big of a difference unless you’re really looking for it. Mirage owners figured this out for themselves soon enough. Rather than shuffling between all eight gears in sequence, which would have taken some extreme levels of coordination, most settled on one mode depending on the situation.
But the Mirage, at least the initial Japanese model, wasn’t the only car to get Mitsubishi’s Super Shift. The setup also made its way into the Cordia, Tredia, and Chariot, as well as the Dodge and Plymouth Colt, which were rebadged Mirages sold in North America. The implementation remained in production until 1990, when it was quietly phased out. The Mirage itself was produced until 2003 before being revived in 2012.
Google has always been ahead of the curve when it comes to protecting Pixel users from spam calls, and it looks like the company isn’t done yet. According to a recent teardown of the Google Phone app by Android Authority, Google is working on a new phone number spoofing detection feature.
Phone number spoofing, also known as caller ID spoofing, is when a scammer tricks your phone into displaying a familiar or saved contact’s number, even though the call is actually coming from a completely different number.

As users are more likely to pick up a call if it looks like it’s coming from family members, friends, or authorized personnel, like a doctor or a bank representative, phone number spoofing is on the rise in the scam chart. It has become a surprisingly common tactic and one that has caught a lot of people off guard.
Android Authority cracked open version 222.0.913376317 of the Google Phone app and found strings of code that point to an upcoming spoofing detection system. One of the strings reads, “Someone may be pretending to call from your contact’s number,” and another suggests that users will have the option to hang up the call immediately.
It’s not entirely clear how Google plans to detect spoofed numbers, but the timing is interesting. Only a few days back, Google announced a slew of security features, including verified financial calls, OTP protection, real-time malware detection, APK scanning in Chrome, and more.

With the new call spoof detection feature and existing spam call protections, including Call Screening and spam detection, the Pixel phones have become the best anti-scam smartphones. There’s no word yet on when this feature will roll out, but it’s good to know Google is working on it.
The Tampa-based, Sun Capital-owned software services firm is folding the SAP- and IWG-trusted UK digital agency into its Digital Experiences practice. Deal terms were not disclosed.
Exadel, the Tampa-based software-development and consulting firm, has acquired Tangent, the London-based digital experience consultancy, the company said on Monday. Terms were not disclosed.
Tangent will continue to operate under its existing brand inside Exadel’s Digital Experiences practice, with chief executive Leigh Gammons moving into a managing director and senior vice president role to lead the business.
On Exadel’s own framing, the deal is about pairing two halves of an enterprise transformation engagement that have traditionally lived in different vendor categories.
Exadel sells what it calls AI-native engineering: data infrastructure, applications, and the back-end work of running an enterprise’s technology stack, on a 2,000-plus headcount across the US, Europe and LATAM.
Tangent sells the front-end discipline, including UX, product, web experience and MarTech engineering, on a smaller boutique footprint built up around what its website describes as enterprise digital-product work. The acquisition pulls strategy, design and engineering inside one contract.
‘Brands increasingly win or lose based on the AI-driven digital experiences they provide to customers,’ said James Dalziel, Exadel’s chief operating officer, in the statement.
‘By bringing Tangent into the organisation, we are fortifying our ability to help global clients not only design exceptional experiences, but also continuously optimise and scale them through AI.’
Gammons described the value of the combination from the other direction: ‘Companies are demanding more than great digital experiences. They need to provide experiences that can constantly evolve and drive measurable outcomes.’
Tangent has been operating since 2001 and counts SAP, IWG, and UK Power Networks among its enterprise clients, according to its own published materials, with the Exadel release also naming New Balance and Vodafone.
Its team is London-headquartered with a Newcastle office and a delivery footprint across Spain, South Africa, Poland, Egypt, and Pakistan. Gammons joined the agency as chief executive after leaving a senior role at WPP.
Exadel’s M&A appetite has a recognisable shape. The company is owned by an affiliate of Sun Capital Partners after a take-private transaction, and has spent the past few years adding capability through bolt-ons.
Its prior acquisitions include Motion Software, CPQi and Coppei. Tangent is the latest in that arc, and the first explicitly aimed at the design-and-strategy front of the enterprise stack rather than the engineering or sector-specific back.
The two companies have also announced a joint AI accelerator programme for enterprise clients, framed as a way to take engagements from ‘AI ambition to real-world delivery’.
The structural detail, pricing, and pilot customers have not been published. The framing positions Exadel as an AI-native alternative to the Big Four and the global systems integrators on engagements where Tangent’s experience-design front-end has historically been outsourced to a different vendor.
The acquisition lands inside a broader recalibration of the enterprise-services category that has been visible for several quarters. AI-agent products from the foundation labs have started to reach directly into the workflows that consultancies have traditionally billed for.
Anthropic shipped ten financial-services agent templates earlier this month, pulled Moody’s data inside the workspace, and built distribution through Microsoft 365 and Snowflake.
SAP unveiled an Autonomous Enterprise framework with more than 200 AI agents at Sapphire on a co-development with Anthropic. The competitive question for a services firm with Exadel’s profile is no longer whether the AI side of the stack will be the most valuable; it is whether the integrator that can plug the model layer into the customer experience layer end-to-end retains pricing power against the model layer itself.
Whether the Exadel-Tangent combination has the scale to be that integrator is the question the next 18 months of customer wins will settle.
The ‘Exadel Colleague’ AI delivery product, which Exadel launched last month, is the company’s bet that its engineering side will not be commoditised by the models.
Tangent’s customer roster is what determines whether the design side, attached to that engineering side, gives the combined business a contract-by-contract structural advantage in front-end-heavy enterprise work.
Google‘s annual Google I/O developer conference is almost upon us, and as well as getting new features for Android phones and a better look at those new Googlebooks, as a wearables enthusiast I’m curious to see what happens with Wear OS 7.
Because Google I/O is primarily for developers, we should get a better look at the latest slate of operating systems and AI powers that devs can use to design new apps and features for the likes of the Google Pixel Watch 4, Samsung Galaxy Watch8, and more upcoming, unannounced devices.
The Android Show had some neat new Gemini Intelligence features on display, notably the ability to create custom widgets simply by describing them to Gemini. After doing so, Gemini will seemingly vibe-code your widget for you.
We weren’t given any indication that you could create widgets directly on a smartwatch using Gemini and its microphone, but we were shown that watches could use custom widgets too. During the stream, we see a widget created for a Google Pixel Watch 4 to display wind and rain for ideal cycling conditions.
Expect more customization like this on Wear OS 7, with the ability to pull out nuggets of information and display them front-and-center.
During the Android Show, we saw a graphic of a message about getting lunch with a friend display on a Pixel Watch. Once the plans have been made, a prompt shows up to create a calendar event, listed as “Add lunch at Zany’s Bistro, Sun 11:30am”.
This is part of Gemini’s new ‘complex task automation’ feature, which can look at contextual information and complete tasks for you, such as booking a front-row bike for your upcoming spin class, or searching for a coffee tour in Costa Rica fitting your specifications (both examples given in the presentation).
Because the feature was shown as being on-watch, we’re betting Wear OS 7 will be ideal not just to serve you notifications that these things are happening, but to do some of its own on-device thinking too. For example, I bet we’ll be able to ask the watch to open Google Maps and generate a route to Zany’s Bistro based on the messages described, likely by asking a simple question like “how far is it?”
During the Android Show, we saw director of product operations Dieter Bohn use a piece of software called Rambler, an improved AI-powered speech-to-text that interprets long-winded, unclear messages full of filler words and backtracking, rather than transcribing literally.
As transcription gets better, speech is becoming one of the key ways we interact with wearables today — I certainly wouldn’t get very far in the kitchen without asking my Apple Watch Ultra 3 to set a timer for me, using its raise-to-talk functionality. As we expand our usage of voice assistants with wearables, it’s hard not to see Rambler coming to Wear OS sooner rather than later.
All these AI features need a lot of power. While it seems every upgrade promises better, more efficient battery management, this is almost a given if we’re getting upgraded AI tools — even if it’s just to keep devices like the Google Pixel Watch at, or close to, the device’s battery life listed at the point of sale.
We’ll likely see more unannounced features, but they’ll all be revolving around the same sort of thing — using to power of AI to hoover up contextual information from existing functions to improve or iterate on previous features.
For example, if you turn up to the same pilates studio every week, Apple will combine GPS information with workout data and prompt you to start a pilates workout. Its Workout Buddy feature takes you entire exercise history and crunches it, letting you know if the mile you just ran was your fastest ever.
I’m positive we’ll see similar features on future Wear OS watches, and it might even be this year. The use of historic data from different apps to anticipate the user’s needs is already becoming a key part of the agentic AI experiences companies like Google are trying to provide.
Follow TechRadar on Google News and add us as a preferred source to get our expert news, reviews, and opinion in your feeds. Make sure to click the Follow button!
And of course, you can also follow TechRadar on YouTube and TikTok for news, reviews, unboxings in video form, and get regular updates from us on WhatsApp too
Commencement season has come around again — and this year, a couple speakers have discovered that it’s tough to get graduating students excited about a future shaped by artificial intelligence.
Last week, Gloria Caulfield, an executive at real estate firm Tavistock Development Company, gave a speech at the University of Central Florida acknowledging that we’re living in a time of “profound change,” which can be both “exciting” and “daunting.”
“The rise of artificial intelligence is the next industrial revolution,” Caulfield declared — prompting the students in the audience to begin booing, getting louder and louder until Caulfield chuckled, turned to the other speakers, and asked, “What happened?”
“Okay, I struck a chord,” she said. Caulfield then tried to resume her speech, saying, “Only a few years ago, AI was not a factor in our lives” — only to be interrupted again by the audience, this time by their loud cheers and applause.
Former Google CEO Eric Schmidt faced a similar response when he brought up AI at a University of Arizona speech on Friday.
In Schmidt’s case, the criticism actually began before the speech itself, with some student groups calling for him to be removed as commencement speaker due to a lawsuit in which a former girlfriend and business partner accused Schmidt of sexual assault. (He has denied the allegations.) According to a local news report, the booing began even before Schmidt took the stage.
But Schmidt also got loud boos when he told students, “You will help shape artificial intelligence.” The booing was persistent enough that Schmidt tried to speak over it, insisting, “You can now assemble a team of AI agents to help you with the parts that you could never accomplish on your own. When someone offers you a seat on the rocket ship, you do not ask which seat, you just get on.”
To be fair, AI isn’t becoming a third rail at every graduation ceremony. Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang recently spoke at Carnegie Mellon’s commencement, and he didn’t seem to get any audible pushback when he said that AI has “reinvented computing.”
Still, it’s not exactly surprising to find some students in a booing mood. In a recent Gallup poll, only 43% of Americans aged 15 to 34 said it’s a good time to find a job locally, a steep drop from 75% in 2022.
That pessimism isn’t solely a response to the rise of AI (a shift that even some software engineers are worried about), but journalist and tech industry critic Brian Merchant suggested that for many students, AI has become “the cruel new face of hyper-scaling capitalism.”
“I too would loudly boo at the prospect of this next industrial revolution if I was in my early twenties, unemployed, and had aspirations for my future greater than entering prompts into an LLM,” Merchant wrote.
Even when graduation speeches didn’t mention AI explicitly, “resilience” was a recurring theme this year. Schmidt himself acknowledged that there is “a fear in your generation that the future has already been written, that the machines are coming, that the jobs are evaporating, that the climate is breaking, that politics are fractured, and that you are inheriting a mess that you did not create.”
Caulfield, meanwhile, might also have misread her audience of arts and humanities graduates. One student said that before mentioning AI, Caulfield already started to lose them with her “generic” praise of corporate executives like Jeff Bezos.
Another graduate, Alexander Rose Tyson, told The New York Times, “It wasn’t one person that really started the booing. It was just sort of like a collective, ‘This sucks.’”
When you purchase through links in our articles, we may earn a small commission. This doesn’t affect our editorial independence.
Best Buy found a way to stay alive and even thrive as contemporaries like Circuit City fumbled in the age of Amazon. Now it’s one of the biggest electronics retailers on the web, leveraging a quality online shopping experience with brick-and-mortar outfits so you can choose to wait for delivery or head to your nearest store and get your new phone, TV, laptop, or audio gear in a hurry. With a Best Buy discount code or Best Buy promo code, you can save on the company’s already competitive pricing. Here are some hot deals currently available.
This Best Buy Credit Card deal is a solid offer for anyone shopping big on electronics like OLED TVs, headphones, soundbars, and other gear. For everything you buy on your first day of purchases, you’ll get 10% back, including 2.5 bonus points and an additional 5% back in rewards. There are, of course, stipulations and terms. You’ll need to make your purchases within 14 days of opening a new account, you can’t combine these deals with other offers, and points aren’t awarded on promotional credit purchases. The deal is available in select stores, and online offers “may vary.”
You can also choose financing options like 12-month financing on storewide purchases totalling $299 and up, 18-month financing on appliances and grills totaling $599 and up, or 24-month financing on unlocked phone purchases totaling $649 and up.
Best Buy offers some sweet daily deals, including Top Deals that could save you up to 60% off retail pricing, and 24-hour discounts on a rotating deal of the day to help you save on gear like laptops, TVs, appliances, and other products. These deals switch swiftly, so be sure to check back often so you can jump on the next big discount.
If you’re in it for the long haul, it’s worth signing up for My Best Buy. It’s free and you get all sorts of Best Buy discounts and promos, along with multiple other benefits, starting with Free Standard Shipping across all levels.
Move up to the My Best Buy Plus ($50/year) or My Best Buy Total ($180/year) will get you benefits like two-day shipping, exclusive member prices and deals on thousands of items, access to exclusive sales events and products, and a 60-day return window on the majority of products.
The My Best Buy Total plan offers a few other extras, including protection plans like AppleCare+, free in-store and online support services for computers and tablets, 24/7 tech support, 20% off repairs, and more.
Those aren’t the only perks of jumping on one of Best Buy’s paid membership plans. Join up with the My Best Buy Plus or My Best Buy Total plans and get a slew of other Membership Deals, including a daily chance to win $1,000 in My Best Buy certificates (through May 2).
The paid membership deals also unlock all sorts of subscription deals, including , 30 days of free Fubo Pro, a 2-month trial of Tastemade+ recipes, 6 months of free SiriusXM All Access satellite radio, 3 months of free YouTube Premium, and 60 days of free LifeLock ID theft protection (along with 75% off on your first year’s subscription). You can also get a 90-day free trial for McAfee Privacy and Identity Guardian Online protection (or 80% off a 1-year subscription), and a month of Discord Nitro for free, to enhance your Discord experience with personalized profiles, animated emojis, and more.
Finally, there’s no better way to stretch your dollars than to leverage hot deals on items like TVs, monitors, computers, and other electronics from major competitors to save with the Best Buy Price Match Guarantee. The deal works like this: identify an identical product from a Qualified Competitor (which, sadly, excludes Amazon), then connect with Best Buy over Best Buy Chat online or by calling 1-888-BEST BUY to save.
AI is spawning new job titles from Claude Evangelist ($240K) to vibe coder ($108K) even as it eliminates the roles they’re replacing.
AI companies are not just changing the way people work. They are changing the kinds of roles that exist. Org charts are morphing as an entirely new class of jobs emerges, some with titles that did not exist two years ago, others that represent old professions reborn inside the technology industry. The hiring sprees stand in stark contrast to the layoffs that many of the same companies are citing AI as the justification for.
The range is striking. Companies are looking for everything from one of the oldest intellectual pursuits, philosophy, to an entirely new category of work spawned by generative AI coding tools, the professional vibe coder. Between those poles sit forward deployed engineers, AI accelerators, evangelists, gig workers training models, and a growing class of C-suite officers whose entire job is to make sure the rest of the company uses AI.
The forward deployed engineer is the hottest role in the category. Popularised by Palantir in the 2010s, the job embeds a specialised engineer directly with a customer to deliver tailored AI solutions rather than off-the-shelf software. Indeed data shows that job postings for forward deployed engineers in January 2026 were roughly 19 times the volume of the year before. Palantir CEO Alex Karp has compared the role to a seasoned waiter in a French restaurant, combining deep product knowledge with exquisite service. OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, Amazon Web Services, and Palantir are all hiring, with starting salaries ranging from $115,000 to more than $200,000. Salesforce’s projected $300 million in Anthropic token spending this year illustrates the scale of enterprise AI adoption these engineers are being hired to support.
The AI evangelist is a different kind of hire. Anthropic is looking for a “Claude Evangelist,” someone who will serve as the company’s face in the startup ecosystem, combining at least seven years of founder-builder experience with developer-facing credibility. The role pays $240,000, significantly more than the $106,000 average for a US director of communications, according to Indeed. OpenAI has tripled the size of its communications team. Adobe is hunting for a “Business Architect & AI Evangelist.” The underlying logic is that AI products are too complex and too consequential to sell through conventional marketing. They require people who can explain, demonstrate, and build trust in person.
The AI philosopher may be the most unexpected entry. Anthropic has a resident philosopher. So does Google DeepMind. Both positions focus on ensuring AI models are aligned with human values. Anthropic publishes a Constitution for Claude, a detailed description of the values it wants its AI to have, and the philosophical work behind it is not decorative. Google DeepMind recently sought an emerging impacts manager in AI ethics and safety with a base salary of $212,000 to $231,000. Philosophy departments that have spent years defending their enrolment numbers now have a direct pipeline into technology companies paying more than twice the median salary for the discipline.
The internal AI accelerator is the role that most directly confronts the tension between AI hiring and AI layoffs. Stripe is hiring a “Forward Deployed AI Accelerator” to embed within its marketing team and make “AI the default mode for all work.” Box is hiring an “AI Business Automation Engineer” to integrate AI agents across its cloud management platform. These roles exist to push employees who already have jobs to use AI more aggressively, which raises the question of what happens to the employees who do not adapt. GM’s decision this week to lay off 500 IT workers while simultaneously hiring for 250 AI positions is the clearest illustration of the dynamic: the same company is both creating and eliminating jobs in the same quarter.
The vibe coder is the newest category. The term, popularised by AI coding tools that allow non-engineers to build functional software through natural language prompts, has moved from internet slang to job listings. Lovable, a vibe-coding platform, is hiring professional vibe coders. TikTok is looking for a product designer who can create prototypes using “code and AI tools.” YouTube wants an “AI Solution Architect” who can “bypass traditional, slow-moving development cycles by utilizing AI-assisted development (vibe-coding) and low code solutions.” Engineering leaders are still figuring out how to measure the productivity gains from AI coding tools, but the job market is already pricing the skill as a standalone qualification. TikTok’s role starts at $108,000. YouTube’s starts at $149,000.
At the bottom of the AI jobs pyramid sit the gig workers who train the models. Companies like Scale AI and Mercor employ workers to evaluate creative writing output, train translation capabilities, and refine AI reasoning. Traditional gig platforms including Uber, DoorDash, and Instawork are also offering jobs that pay users for uploading photos and videos of chores and tasks that will be used to train AI systems. Depending on experience and task complexity, workers earn anywhere from $15 to roughly $200 per hour. The barrier to entry is lower than for any other AI role, but so is the security.
At the top sits the Chief AI Officer. PwC appointed one in July 2024. Accenture created a chief responsible AI officer the same year. Raymond James established a “Principal AI Architect” in 2025. Local governments are following: Arkansas is hiring a Chief AI Officer at a starting salary of just over $117,000. Glassdoor estimates private-sector pay for the role between $265,000 and $494,000.
The graduates entering this market are doing so at a moment when AI is simultaneously the most in-demand skill and the technology most frequently cited as the reason for layoffs. Detroit’s Big Three automakers have cut 20,000 white-collar jobs while posting 400 AI positions. Salesforce cut 4,000 support staff and is spending $300 million on Anthropic tokens. The pattern is consistent: the jobs AI creates pay more, require more specialised skills, and are fewer in number than the jobs it eliminates. The net effect on employment is a question economists will debate for years. What is not in debate is that the job titles on the name tags at the next networking event will look nothing like the ones from two years ago.
iPadOS 26 is the first iPad update in years that makes the device feel meaningfully closer to a real primary computer, even if it still isn’t consistent enough to fully replace a Mac.
Apple has continually enhanced the iPad’s hardware, yet the software remains tethered to an iPhone-like design. The design has always imposed strict sandboxing, limits background activity, and restricted multitasking capabilities.
Those choices prioritize security and efficiency but prevent apps from behaving like they do on a Mac, which has long limited the iPad in more complex work. With iPadOS 26, Apple addresses some of those limits, as well as giving it a facelift with its new Liquid Glass design.
As part of that new design, the update introduces a new windowing system and a refreshed interface that push the iPad closer to desktop-style workflows without turning it into macOS.
I used my iPad Pro as my primary computer before iPadOS 26, even with a MacBook Air nearby. The iPad fits how I prefer to work, but iPadOS has often forced compromises that macOS does not, and this update reduces some of those gaps without fully eliminating them.
Liquid Glass certainly gives iPadOS 26 a distinctive look, and I like it overall, but it matters less than the workflow changes and occasionally it even gets in the way. Liquid Glass is predominantly a visual style and emphasizes translucency, depth, and motion.
So controls adjust their color and contrast based on what’s behind them, meaning that the same buttons can appear lighter over dark content and darker over bright areas. There are also changes to how menus and options appear, some of which is definitely a positive:
That last is best exemplified by the Weather app, which is a particularly attractive design. However, even in that case, there is a tradeoff in simple readability with Liquid Glass.
For instance, with iPadOS 26 you are much more likely to have overlapping windows, because you can, and because it is definitely a boon to be able to see multiple apps. But the readability issues were enough that Apple added more controls in the iPadOS 26.1 update, that let you choose between Clear and Tinted appearances.
There’s also Reduce Transparency, an option that is tucked away under Settings, Accessibility, and Display & Text Size. That removes most translucency across the interface, improving contrast when Liquid Glass becomes distracting.
Liquid Glass definitely does enhances the iPad’s appearance by adding depth and motion to the interface. Yet some elements can even distract when scrolling through content because the glassy distortion effect moves across the material underneath.
Consequently, those improved controls in iPadOS 26.1 are needed to tone down when Liquid Glass gets in the way.
But then Liquid Glass, for all the attention paid to its visual style, is also a productivity aid. It’s the overall Liquid Glass look and feel that makes the iPad just that much more like a Mac.
Most significantly, iPadOS 26’s Liquid Glass redesign introduces resizable, movable windows that finally let you arrange apps around the task instead of forcing the task into the system’s layout. You can now open multiple windows at once and keep everything in view.
Safari can sit next to Pages, Notes, Messages, and Files without forcing everything into a fixed Split View layout or a Stage Manager group.
So apps and their windows can be arranged around the task instead of the other way around. Plus iPadOS 26 remembers where each window was placed, so your layout stays intact across tasks.
Returning to a project brings back the same workspace instead of forcing you to rebuild it. The best part for me is drag and drop, because moving text, images, or files from one app to another feels much more natural when both apps can stay visible.
Apple also adds more direct ways to organize windows. Apps can snap into halves and quarters instead of being locked into the previous Split View or Slide Over options. Then, too, an Expose-style view now shows every open window at once instead of your having to group them together in Stage Manager.
As good as all of this is, I use the 11-inch iPad Pro, and the smaller screen makes the new windowing feel cramped faster than you’d expect. Smaller iPads don’t benefit from freeform windowing as much as larger models, so tiling often works better than trying to manage several floating windows.
But then windows can also minimize when you want to clear screen to concentrate on something. That alone makes the iPad feel closer to a traditional desktop.
You’ll need time to learn how to place, resize, and manage multiple windows, though, and early on it’s easy to misplace apps, trigger the wrong layout, or fight resizing behavior that isn’t always consistent.
Arranging apps is still less smooth than on macOS, especially when you’re trying to maintain a clean layout across tasks. Resizing isn’t consistent, and it’s one of the first things you notice when you start working this way.
Plus all these months after iPadOS 26 came out, you will still run into apps that jump between sizes, break layouts, or don’t fully support the new system.
Nonetheless, daily work is more flexible with this windowing because opening a document from Files or Mail simply creates a new window on screen instead of entirely replacing the previous app. You can keep your existing layout intact and return to it after checking a document, rather than rebuilding your workspace each time.
As a result, the iPad finally supports more complex work without constantly reminding you that the operating system is in the way.
Windowing gets most of the attention, but ultimately it’s only as good as it is, though, because the rest of the system finally starts catching up with the Mac.
The new menu bar adds a Mac-style layer on top of existing app controls rather than replacing them. I like it because it surfaces controls you may have forgotten about or never even knew existed, and the Help menu is especially useful when you want to search for an action instead of hunting through the interface.
Older iPad apps often hid commands in toolbars, popovers, and gestures, which made them harder to find. Command search fixes that by letting you type what you want to do instead of hunting through the interface.
Then, too, the Dock now plays a larger role in iPadOS 26 by acting more like a workspace than a simple app launcher. You can pin folders from the Files app, including locations like On My iPad, iCloud Drive, or external storage, then open them and drag files directly into apps like Mail, Messages, or Notes.
You can also drag apps from the Dock to tile them on screen or place them into Slide Over. This makes multitasking feel more direct and useful than before. It means you can keep documents, conversations, and reference material within reach during active work and not have to constantly think about switching apps.
In another way that the iPad now benefits from Mac-like features, there’s the updated Files app. In iPadOS 26, Files becomes much more useful by expanding its old list view to show more metadata at a glance, including file size, kind, date modified, and tags.
You can also sort by each column directly from the header, which makes Files feel less frustrating when you are working through a large folder.
Plus collapsible folders expand inline, so you can click a disclosure triangle next to one folder and see its contents without having to open it first. Consequently, it’s now possible to look through nested directories without ever leaving your current location.
It makes large project structures easier to navigate, because you are no longer constantly going into and out of folders. Then, too, resizable columns let you prioritize names, dates, or sizes, meaning you can see more, and you can drill down into just what you need.
That’s a boon by itself, but then there’s how the new Files app remembers my layout and sort order for each location. Returning to the same folders no longer requires resetting how files are displayed.
iPadOS 26 also makes background work more visible and dependable, especially for file transfers, exports, and downloads. The update introduces persistent progress indicators in the Files app and system UI, such as real-time transfer bars and status badges.
Previously, large exports, copies, or downloads would feel tied to the app that started them. If you’ve ever exported a video from Final Cut Pro for iPad, you know that you simply have to walk away until it’s done, because there was nothing else you could do.
Now operations like that can continue in the background — if the app supports this feature — while you move between apps, open documents, or rearrange windows.
So now, at last, I can start a file transfer, jump into Messages, and come back without losing progress. It removes an annoyance more than it radically changes my workflow, but, still, if you’re a Mac user, this is something that seems so basic.
Also, to facilitate this new flexibility, completed tasks surface clear confirmations or notifications. So now you immediately know when large operations finish and you’re not left having to check manually.
In another Mac-like move, the iPad’s cursor now behaves more like a standard pointer, with more precise control and familiar interactions across buttons, menus, and text fields. iPadOS 26 moves away from the circular, morphing cursor used in earlier versions and adopts a more traditional pointer model.
Moving that pointer quickly back and forth enlarges the pointer so it’s easier to find on larger displays, just as it does on the Mac.
It’s not that the iPad should become a Mac, though. There are still iPad-specific features and a particularly welcome new one concerns the menus that apps can now display. A system-wide menu bar appears at the top of the screen when using a keyboard and trackpad, giving you consistent access to app commands.
It all makes longer workflows more practical.
If you are going to be using your iPad for extended work, though, you’ve long been able to use an external monitor and that has seen an improvement too. iPadOS 26 extends the new windowing system across displays and lets each screen host its own set of apps with independent window placement.
Now windows can be moved between displays, and each screen keeps its layout instead of resetting when you switch focus.
So you can easily keep a document on one display and reference material on the other, which cuts down on how often you have to bounce between apps.
Earlier versions of iPadOS could do something of this with Stage Manager, but it was limited and it forced you into building groups of apps. Those setups often fell back to mirroring or constrained resolutions depending on the display.
iPadOS 26 removes those constraints and makes multi-display use more flexible.
However, external display support still has limitations that affect how the system works across screens.
System controls like Control Center, notifications, and certain system menus, for instance, remain on the iPad’s built-in display. So there’s no equivalent of the way with a MacBook Pro that you can shut the laptop’s lid while you work.
You still have to keep the iPad screen to hand in order to accessing system menus or managing certain actions.
Plus external display behavior still depends on app support. So some apps will still open at fixed sizes, ignore certain layouts, or jump between sizes when you move them between displays.
Placement and resizing still feel inconsistent in practice. So there are improvements and they are good, but it’s inconsistent. Which is also something you can say about how Apple Intelligence now works in iPadOS 26.
Apple Intelligence adds useful features across iPadOS 26, but it’s variable enough that you still can’t rely on it the way you might expect.
Just as on the Mac and the iPhone, there isn’t an Apple Intelligence app. Instead, it powers specific tasks inside all other apps, and that means it can be more limited than full-blown third-party software.
But then that means that Apple Intelligence’s Live Translation can provide real-time text translation right inside in Messages. It can provide spoken translation within a FaceTime call.
Similarly, Apple Intelligence can summarize text, and do so within other apps. In Mail, for instance, I can scan a long thread and get a quick overview before deciding whether to dig into the full conversation, which saves time when messages stack up.
In Safari, summaries are more deliberate, since you have to choose to turn them on when you open a site. But they still help when I only need the gist of an article before moving on.
Summaries handle straightforward content well, though they can miss nuance or gloss over specifics in longer or more complex threads. I don’t rely on summaries for detail, but they’re good enough to decide whether something is worth reading in full.
The system processes many requests on the device, so tasks like rewriting text, summarizing messages, and responding to on-screen content happen quickly and without sending that data off your iPad. Local models keep everyday interactions fast and avoid pushing drafts, emails, or documents to external servers by default.
More demanding requests move to Private Cloud Compute, which runs on Apple-managed servers when the iPad can’t handle the task locally. The handoff happens automatically, so simple tasks stay fast on-device while more complex ones depend on that shift and can take longer to complete.
This means that Apple Intelligence can handle those more complex tasks, but it does not mean that Apple Intelligence suddenly becomes less secure. Instead, through Apple’s Private Cloud Compute, your prompts are sent with only the minimum necessary data in encrypted form to Apple-run servers built on Apple Silicon.
That then processes prompts and responses in memory without retaining it. It’s all designed so that even Apple cannot access user data.
Apple also publishes verifiable system images, which means that security researchers can inspect how the servers operate. You don’t see this process directly, but it gives those outside experts a way to absolutely confirm that your data isn’t being improperly stored or misused.
Note, though, that access to Apple Intelligence depends heavily on hardware and configuration. Most features, for instance, require iPads with Apple Silicon such as M1 and newer chips, along with devices like the iPad mini with A17 Pro.
Many Apple Intelligence features run directly on the device, including Writing Tools, summarization, Siri‘s on-screen awareness, and parts of Live Translation. Those features rely on the memory and neural performance those chips provide.
Capabilities vary based on language support and regional availability. For example, features like on-device Siri requests and Apple Intelligence summaries can be limited or delayed in certain regions, and Apple Intelligence features in China face additional regulatory hurdles that affect how and when they launch.
Differences in language support also affect accuracy and feature availability, especially for tools like Live Translation and Writing Tools.
Even within US English, though, there are differences depending on what iPad you have. On-device models take up storage space and may require additional downloads, so availability and performance can vary.
In practice, this means some features arrive later, don’t appear at all, or behave differently depending on where and how you’re using the iPad. Writing Tools is a good example of how that plays out in daily use.
Writing Tools, one of Apple Intelligence’s most prominent features, doesn’t generate content like other large language models. Instead, it helps you refine and enhance you existing writing, rather than creating new text from scratch.
Short edits like proof-reading a sentence or a paragraph, are processed instantly, while longer rewrites take a few seconds to process. Despite that noticeable delay, the editing experience still feels local, and the speed ensures that you don’t lose your place while working.
Proof-reading is the part I trust most. The rewrite and tone tools might be useful as optional helpers, but I don’t rely on them for anything that needs a strong point of view.
Writing Tools arguably works best as refinement, an option that tightens sentences, smooths awkward phrasing, and cuts repetition. The “Concise” option is the most useful in practice, while tone presets like “Professional” and “Friendly” tend to overcorrect and flatten the voice.
That’s where the limits show, since rewrites often lose nuance in longer or more opinionated passages and I don’t trust it with original writing or complex arguments. I still check every change, which limits how useful it actually is for real writing.
Writing Tools isn’t better than dedicated AI tools because it focuses on short edits and refinements rather than generating or restructuring longer pieces of content. It’s useful because it’s built into the system and always within reach, even if it doesn’t replace more capable tools for complex writing.
Whereas Live Translation is startling. It extends Apple Intelligence into real-time communication across Messages, FaceTime, and calls.
The feature works directly inside these apps, so conversations translate in place without switching tools. So you can talk or message across languages without breaking the flow or copying text between apps.
It’s in Messages that Live Translation offers the most immediate benefit in daily use because incoming and outgoing text appears translated inline. The interface keeps the original message visible below the translation, which makes it easier to follow longer conversations and verify meaning when phrasing is ambiguous.
FaceTime and calls bring the same idea to spoken language. The system generates live captions on screen as people talk, translating speech in real time so each side can follow along in their preferred language.
Some scenarios also support spoken output for translated audio, though availability depends on language support. Live Translation handles language detection automatically in most cases.
The system identifies the language each person uses during a conversation. It adjusts translation direction automatically and removes the need to switch languages manually.
I don’t need use Live Translation in my daily workflow, but the value is obvious for people who regularly message or call across languages. In my experience, accuracy holds up well for simple exchanges, but it does breaks down once conversations get more complex.
Strong accents, background noise, and technical language make mistakes more likely, too. So the feature works best for casual communication rather than precise or specialized discussions.
That’s also true for Genmoji and Image Playground, which aren’t entirely new to iPadOS 26, but are expanded. They are still for lighter, more casual use like messages, reactions, and quick visuals, but now Apple has expanded both with more customization options and deeper integration into system apps.
I rarely use Genmoji or Image Playground, and they feel more like occasional novelties than tools that change how I use the iPad. Still, the changes make them easier to access, although they remain incremental rather than defining additions to the update.
You’ll soon find limitations, too. Imaging limitations in particular become clear when I try more specific requests that require detail, tone, or realism. Image Playground relies on a narrow set of styles and produces flattened results with minimal variation.
Genmoji follows the same pattern in everyday use. I can generate personalized emoji on demand, though the results rarely capture subtle expressions or context with accuracy.
Apple prioritizes safety, speed, and system-level integration across these features, but that approach limits flexibility and output quality.
Genmoji and Image Playground offer visible examples of Apple’s AI strategy, though they play a smaller role in sustained work. Apple focuses on integrating AI into familiar system features instead of introducing a single dominant interface.
Although you might think that Siri would be the perfect example of a single, dominant interface for everything.
Siri has not had its promised radical improvements yet, but it does now understand and respond to what’s on your screen. So you can ask it to summarize an email thread, pull details from a message, or answer questions about a document without switching apps. Apple calls this on-screen awareness.
It works best in apps like Mail, Notes, and Safari where content is clearly structured, and it’s less reliable in more complex or dynamic interfaces.
Siri no longer takes over the full screen and instead uses a soft, multicolor gradient glow around the edges of the display, with shifting tones like blue, purple, and pink. I like it better than the old interface because it keeps the app in view and makes interactions feel quicker and less disruptive.
The interface also shows a compact response panel that keeps the current app visible. Results show inline, which keeps the original content visible and makes it easier to reference what you are asking about in real time.
Siri no longer takes over the full screen and instead uses a soft, multicolor gradient glow around the edgesTyping plays a larger role alongside voice input, with a persistent text field that lets users enter requests at any time. The interface supports typing and speaking in the same place.
That means Siri becomes easier to use in shared spaces or situations where speaking out loud is not practical. And then whichever way you use it, Siri can hand off more complex or open-ended requests to ChatGPT when it isn’t able to provide answers directly.
Just as with all of Apple Intelligence remaining secure even when it uses ChatGPT, Siri prompts you for permission before it sends anything externally.
Simple requests run on-device, and more demanding tasks route to Private Cloud Compute. The transition happens automatically with faster responses for basic actions and no visible indication when a request moves to cloud processing.
All of this means that Siri is less annoying in iPadOS 26, but it still needs a lot of work. Most of the improvement comes from better context awareness and presentation rather than a fundamental shift in how much Siri can actually do, and hopefully iPadOS 27 will push that further.
Siri, and especially windowing are noticeably improved in iPadOS 26, but this update also focuses on closing long-standing gaps that have limited the iPad in everyday workflows. New apps and system features bring native support for tasks like PDF editing, phone calls, journaling, gaming management, and structured content consumption.
Many of these tasks previously required workarounds or third-party apps, so these additions reduce friction across common tasks. More work happens without relying on external tools, and that makes the iPad feel more complete as a primary computing device.
The iPad now gets a dedicated Preview app, bringing Apple’s macOS PDF viewer and editor to iPadOS 26. It can open documents directly from Files and replaces Quick Look as the default viewer for supported file types.
Performance can be slower than Quick Look, Apple’s instant file preview feature, when opening files for viewing, especially when speed matters more than editing. You can change the default behavior by right-clicking a PDF in Files and selecting a different viewer for faster access.
You can open PDFs directly, add annotations with Apple Pencil or touch, highlight text, insert signatures, and fill out forms within the same workflow.
Preview includes an autofill system for PDF forms that cuts down on repetitive data entry across documents. It recognizes common fields like name, address, email, and phone number and fills them in using your saved contact information.
However, Preview can sometimes misread form fields and suggest autofill where it doesn’t belong. You may need to clear or override those suggestions and enter information manually when the layout isn’t recognized correctly.
You can review and adjust each field before confirming, though, which keeps the process accurate without slowing it down. Autofill works best with standard form layouts and becomes less reliable with complex or poorly structured PDFs.
The interface resembles the Mac version in a simplified form, with a sidebar for page thumbnails and a markup toolbar for drawing, shapes, text boxes, and signatures. You can open a PDF from the Files app, make edits like annotating, filling forms, or signing documents, and save changes in place without switching apps.
Preview is good enough for most people because it covers the PDF jobs that come up most often. It replaces several common third-party workflows by handling tasks like signing forms, marking up documents, and making quick edits, even if it doesn’t attempt to match the advanced tools and depth found in full desktop apps.
The Phone app comes to iPad through Continuity and mirrors calls from a nearby iPhone using the same Apple ID and Wi-Fi network. Calls, voicemail, contacts, and recent activity appear in a unified interface alongside Messages and FaceTime, though reliability still depends on your connection and proximity to the iPhone.
Incoming calls ring on the iPad, and you can answer, decline, or start new calls directly from the app or from contact cards across the system. The interface mirrors the iPhone with tabs for Favorites, Recents, Contacts, and Voicemail.
Then, too, Visual Voicemail shows messages with playback controls and transcriptions. Contact integration pulls names, photos, and linked information directly from the system address book.
Call Screening is a great feature that can answer unknown callers, prompt them to identify themselves, and show a live transcript before you choose whether to pick up or not. Hold Assist can stay on a call, detect when a live agent returns, and send a notification so you can rejoin without listening to hold music.
Live Translation offers real-time translation of conversations during supported calls, providing practical value for multilingual communication. While I don’t personally use this feature, I appreciate its availability.
The app still depends on an iPhone nearby because the iPad doesn’t place cellular calls on its own, so all activity routes through the paired device. Consequently, for me, it is nice to have rather than essential, but it does make the tablet feel more like a general-purpose computer.
Journal, one of my favorite Apple apps, arrives on iPad with iPadOS 26 after launching on iPhone and takes advantage of the larger display and Apple Pencil support. The layout gives entries more room to expand, which makes it easier to combine typed text, handwriting, photos, videos, locations, and mood logs in a single view.
Entries build as a continuous timeline with media embedded inline instead of attached separately. Photos and videos sit alongside text, location data appears as maps within the entry, and handwriting can be added directly between paragraphs.
Journal surfaces prompts and suggested moments based on recent photos, places, and activity captured on the device. Suggestions appear directly in the interface and can turn into new entries with minimal effort, making it easier to start writing without needing to come up with an idea.
Journal on iPad makes me use the app more often because long-form writing is easier with a hardware keyboard than it is on the iPhone. Organization also plays a larger role than it does in Apple Notes, which is where I previously stored journal entries.
Multiple journals, timeline navigation, map views, and insights like streaks and totals make it easier to sort entries and revisit them later.
Apple Pencil support gives handwriting and sketching a natural place inside entries instead of forcing everything through a keyboard. You can write, draw, or annotate media within the same entry.
Journal creates a dedicated space for personal writing that encourages regular use through prompts, structure, and tracking. The app supports longer, more intentional entries and turns journaling into a more consistent habit instead of an occasional task.
Another new app introduced in iPadOS 26 is Games, giving the iPad a central gaming hub that Apple never really had before. It shows a full library, including past downloads, and lets you launch titles directly while sorting by category, size, or install status.
Since I’m not a heavy gamer, I don’t use Games often. However, having a central place for the library makes much more sense than burying Game Center in Settings.
A Continue Playing section brings recent games back to the surface, while achievements and leaderboards track progress across titles. Notifications can highlight when a friend beats your score or completes a challenge, which gives Game Center activity more visibility than before.
Games mostly organizes what was already there, but that still helps. It suggests titles based on your and your friends’ gaming habits, highlights new releases, shows top charts and upcoming games, and includes demos so you can try some games before purchasing.
The social layer runs through Game Center. You can track friend activity, take part in challenges, and compete through leaderboards, even in games that are not built around multiplayer.
Invites and challenge prompts make gaming more active without requiring a full multiplayer session. Apple Arcade has its own dedicated space with easier access to its catalog and updates.
Controller support improves the experience in games that support it, with iPadOS recognizing external controllers and allowing navigation without touch. However, support is inconsistent across titles, and some games still ship with incomplete mappings or control quirks.
Apple News also sees refinement in iPadOS 26, especially in News+ Food, which Apple introduced earlier as part of its expansion into recipes and cooking content. The core experience remains the same, but it feels more polished and better suited to the iPad’s larger screen and multitasking workflow.
Recipes function as interactive tools rather than static pages, with features like Cook mode, recipe scaling, unit conversion, timers, and saved notes working together in a more fluid way. Those features aren’t new, but they feel more usable here, especially when moving between steps or keeping a recipe open alongside other apps.
The result is a feature that finally works like a practical cooking tool instead of just a reading experience.
Apple Music in iPadOS 26 focuses on refinement rather than major structural changes. The app introduces AutoMix, which builds on crossfade to blend songs together with more dynamic transitions that adjust to each track.
I like AutoMix, and it works best with electronic music and other steady beats. It can fall apart or fail to trigger with more traditional songs built around vocals, guitars, drums, or more varied rhythms.
Apple Music’s new features also include lyrics translation and pronunciation, allowing you to follow along with songs in various languages directly from the Now Playing view. Library management has seen practical improvements.
You can now pin albums, playlists, artists, or songs to the top of the Library tab for quicker access. Playlists can also be organized into folders directly on the iPad without needing a Mac.
The interface shifts to full-screen artwork that mirrors album and playlist art. It replaces the flat white backgrounds with something that feels more connected to the music you are playing.
Apple Music’s design fits into Apple’s visual direction across iPadOS 26 and keeps the focus on content. The company also expands discovery and utility features around the edges.
Boring white backgrounds are replaced by full-screen artwork on album and playlist pages that mirror the cover artNext, you can now find nearby concerts for artists in your library directly within the app, with tour dates, venue details, and ticket links tied to your listening history. Apple Music highlights shows based on your location, but coverage can be uneven, and listings don’t always reflect what’s actually closest or most relevant in your area.
The feature links listening activity to live events, letting you view details, get directions, or open ticket links without leaving the app.
Music Haptics adds optional tactile feedback that maps elements of a track like rhythm, bass, and intensity to vibration patterns on the device. The system syncs those vibrations in real time with playback and gives users who are deaf or hard of hearing a way to experience music through touch.
Settings let users adjust or disable the haptics, and it works automatically with supported tracks in Apple Music.
There’s a lot to say about iPadOS 26 because it does deliver meaningful improvements across multitasking, system design, and core apps, and it handles more everyday tasks without workarounds. However, some of the same issues that have limited the iPad as a primary computer still show up in daily use.
Nonetheless, iPadOS 26 finally makes the iPad feel like the computer it has been trying to be, even if it still breaks down in some familiar places. It’s the most usable version of iPadOS yet, and I would use it as my only computer, but it still relies on Apple and third-party developers to close gaps that shouldn’t exist anymore.
Forza Horizon 6 looks stunning, but our testing shows modern visuals come at a steep VRAM cost. Here’s how 8GB and 16GB GPUs compare across a range of settings and resolutions.
The Nex Playground is a kid-friendly console that’s pitched as a safer alternative to giving children access to tablets or traditional gaming devices. It launched in the US in December 2023, and ahead of its UK release I spoke with Nex’s bosses about the product’s privacy features, technical specs, and the company’s success so far.
They also had plenty to say about the current offerings for younger gamers, with Tom Kang, the company’s president and head of international, describing popular platform Roblox as “like a poster child for unsafe”.
The Nex Playground is a locked-down ecosystem that offers more than 60 games designed specifically with ages three to 12 in mind. Outfitted with a wide-field-of-view camera, it relies on intuitive motion controls detected via video and processed entirely on the device.
The relatively modest technical specs of the Playground suggest that it’s sold with healthy margins from the get go, removing the need for Nex to claw back profit elsewhere. A library of five games is included with the initial purchase, while a budget-friendly subscription called the Play Pass enables users to access a rapidly growing selection of additional titles — and covers the costs of future game development.
Lee thinks that this approach is worth it, and will set the company up for success in the long run. “We only have a business if parents are resolving their problems, and stay with us for very long time,” he told me. “We need to build that trust, because that is core of the whole model of how this works.”
It’s a message that’s clearly resonating with parents in the US, where the Nex Playground has steadily grown from shipping just 5,000 units in late 2023 to almost 700,000 last year. The product even made headlines when it outsold Sony‘s PlayStation 5 Slim Digital Edition system for a week in November 2025 (per Circana Retail Tracking Service data).
“We managed to do something that people feel could not be done for a long time,” added Lee. “There’s been no new entrant to the market in over 20 years, and we managed to break through. We had to bring back some of the basics and keep our motivation pure.”
The console’s success comes at a time where parents worldwide have been growing increasingly concerned about the safety of their kids online. In the UK, Roblox is the most popular gaming platform among the eight to 12 age demographic, but has been said to “pose real risks to children’s safety” by online safety experts due to the apparent possibility of them encountering inappropriate content and communicating with adults online.
It hosts million of games made by other Roblox players, and offers the tools required for users to create their own. It’s owned by Roblox Corporation, a publicly listed company that’s worth more than $30 billion.
While Kang revealed that he respected the recent introduction of age-based accounts and enhanced parental controls, he described retrofitting safeguarding systems like that as “the worst thing you could do to a business.”
“They’re a publicly traded company, we never want to get there. We want to grow and build that trust that gets stronger over time,” he added. “That’s why gradual growth is very good, because it allows you to make incremental improvements with trust and safety in mind. Not, ‘hey I need 10 million users next week.’”
For its part, a Roblox representative told us that safety is a priority for the platform, and pointed to its many safeguarding features. These include the rollout of mandatory facial age estimation technology earlier this year (a first for a gaming platform of its size), that new age-based account system, and a suite of parental controls.
Although it offers chat functionality, it is monitored with filters that aim to block sensitive information and detect attempts to move conversations to other platforms. The company also assists law enforcement as appropriate.
Pre-orders for the Nex Playground start in the UK on May 18 for £269, with the console available at Amazon, Argos, and Smyths Toys. Those in the US can pick one up now for $299 at retailers including Amazon and Best Buy.
Follow TechRadar on Google News and add us as a preferred source to get our expert news, reviews, and opinion in your feeds.
BloFin War of Whales 2026 Grand Prix opens registration for $5M trading championship
Weekend Open Thread: Theory – Corporette.com
E-Estate Announces 1 Year Live: Washington DC Summit as Real Estate Tokenization Enters Its Next Phase
Coffee Break: Travel Steam Iron
What to expect when you’re expecting a budget
Tech Moves: Microsoft AI leader jumps to OpenAI; former AI2 exec joins Meta; and more
Bitcoin Suisse expands with Digital Asset License and Investment Business Act Registration Approval in Bermuda
GM agrees to $12.75M California settlement over sale of drivers’ data
Pakistan to enter Chinese capital market as war inflation bites
Bitcoin Suisse expands with Digital Asset License and Investment Business Act Registration Approval in Bermuda
Google’s Gemini AI Predicts Incredible Solana Price by the End of 2026
H&R Real Estate Investment Trust (HR.UN:CA) Q1 2026 Earnings Call Transcript
Google reimburses Register sources who were victims of API fraud
Napoleonic enters 2026 Doomben 10,000 field via Abounding withdrawal
The geopolitics behind the UK’s South Atlantic hantavirus rescue mission
The Board of Deputies just smeared Polanski to suck up to Farage
The Best-Kept Makeup Secret for a More Defined Face
Zara Larsson Has Blunt Response To Chris Brown Diss
Comment on Keir Starmer surviving the day as Prime Minister like a turd that wont flush
Why AI is making typography a boardroom conversation
You must be logged in to post a comment Login