Did you know your new iPhone can charge faster than ever? With a 40-watt charging adapter, you can get up to 50 percent in just 20 minutes. Your old charger will still be fine, but if you want the fastest speeds, I like this simple, no-frills charger from Anker. At 45W, it covers your bases and can even juice up a laptop like a MacBook Air. The prongs fold up, making it nice for travel, too.
Advertisement
I tested it with the iPhone 17 Pro and confirmed that the phone was receiving 35 watts when it was close to zero percent (the iPhone 17 Pro accepts up to 36 watts), which is great. My fast-charge speeds beat Apple’s claims, though. The device went from 7 to 83 percent in 30 minutes. Wowza. Better yet, Anker includes a 6-foot USB-C to USB-C cable. —Julian Chokkattu
Other Screen Protectors We’ve Tested
Photograph: Julian Chokkattu
Spigen AluminaCore Tempered Glass Screen Protector for $28: Spigen’s Glas.tR EZ Fit screen protector has all the necessary cleaning tools to wipe down the display before installation, and its application tool is very similar to Smartish and Dbrand, though there’s no pull tab. You remove the backing from the protector, place the tool over the iPhone, then press down on the other side. It creates more air bubbles that you have to deal with, but it’s manageable. It’s super affordable, and you get two in the box, though the edges are a tad sharp.
Caudaube CrystalShield Elite AR for $35: Caudaube’s screen protector is a very close second to our top Dbrand pick. The installation is nearly identical, and the company includes the tools you need to clean the phone’s screen. The tempered aluminosilicate glass has a very soft and smooth feel to it, with especially curvy edges that don’t feel sharp. It also extends all the way around, close to the edges, further than many other screen protectors. It’s a shame you only get one in the box.
Advertisement
Nomad ProShield Glass for $39: Here’s another aluminosilicate screen protector made by Corning, the company that makes the glass on most smartphones. Instead of a pull-tab, you put the phone in the application tool, then close the tool like a book and push down as glass sticks to glass. It worked surprisingly well, with just a few air bubbles. We still feel like the edges of the protector are a little sharper than we’d like, compared to the Dbrand and Smartish. It also only comes with one.
ESR Armorite Pro screen protector.
Advertisement
Photograph: Julian Chokkattu
ESR Armorite Screen Protector and Privacy Protector for $22: This pack is a better value than Smartish’s screen protectors, because you get three tempered glass sheets instead of two. All the necessary equipment is here, from an application tool to wet wipes. While it uses a pull-tab, we found Smartish’s and Dbrand’s systems easier to use overall. We also tried ESR’s Privacy Protector, which effectively blocked the screen when viewed from the left or right. We didn’t see a major impact on sharpness or color accuracy. We tested ESR’s Armorite Pro with tempered glass made by Corning, the company that makes most of the glass found on smartphones. The edge feels a tiny bit sharp, but it was otherwise easy to apply and looks great.
Astropad Fresh Coat Anti-Reflective Screen Protector for $30: Apple already added an anti-reflective coating to all of the new iPhones, but this Astropad screen protector takes it even further. Installation was easy with the pull-tab application system, though we got far more air bubbles with it than with any of the other pull-tab installations. It actually does work and cuts glare. We compared it with another iPhone without a screen protector and noticed glare was less pronounced with the Astropad. There’s no real loss in color accuracy or sharpness. We compared photos on the two phones, and they looked virtually identical. We haven’t found much reason to complain about glare on the iPhone 17 screen, but if something like that has bothered you before, the Fresh Coat might be up your alley.
Other Great Cases
We’ve tested more than 100 cases for the iPhone 17 lineup. Not all of them deserve a top spot above, but many are still great and come in fun designs and styles. Check ’em out.
Advertisement
Photograph: Julian Chokkattu
Bitmo Lab Gamebaby Case for $40: “This is freaking awesome,” are the first words we said once we got the Gamebaby set up and working with the Delta retro game emulator. This is a phone case styled like a Nintendo Game Boy, but you can pop off the bottom piece and put it over your phone screen to emulate the original portable gaming console, physical buttons and all, while you emulate old games (assuming you’re somewhat versed on how to do that legally). The buttons basically have capacitive sensors on the underside that tap the screen, corresponding with the virtual buttons. The only issue we had was that my down button on the D-pad didn’t align properly, so we had to shift the whole pad slightly lower for it to work. That’s not great, but it didn’t stop us from taking a 30-minute break to play Pokémon Crystal. As a case, it’s quite plasticky and slippery, but the buttons are clicky, if a bit rattly. For $40, we don’t mind; it’s super fun.
Spigen Classic LS Case for $40: This retro-inspired case makes your iPhone look like an old Macintosh computer. It completely covers the camera plateau, and there’s also a lanyard strap hole. It’s not the grippiest, but it has some bulk on the edges and corners, which makes it a bit easier to hold. If you’re a longtime Apple fan, this case can lend your phone a unique look while still offering protection. It’s only available for the iPhone 17 Pro and Pro Max.
Photograph: Julian Chokkattu
Pela Case With MagSafe for $75: We love the rubbery texture of Pela’s cases, and they’re sustainably made in Canada from a nontoxic, plant-based biopolymer by this Certified B Corp. Pela also has dozens and dozens of gorgeous designs to choose from, but we really like this crocodile pattern. We don’t think it’s the most durable-feeling case—the edges could be a little more raised over the display—and annoyingly, the buttons are quite stiff (particularly the Action Button). At least Pela now includes MagSafe connectivity, though you have to check off “With MagSafe” when ordering to ensure the magnetic strip is included in the case. We’ve attached various magnetic accessories to it without issue.
Advertisement
Photograph: Julian Chokkattu
OpenCase for $56: OpenCase is a rare accessory maker trying something different. Instead of adding a MagSafe ring inside the case, there’s a big cutout on the back. Traditionally, adding magnetic accessories means a bulkier phone, but with a cutout design, you can reduce the overall thickness. The company makes a few accessories that perfectly slot into the design, like a wallet, grip, and even a filler plate for when you aren’t using a MagSafe accessory. The case itself is quite nice, with a leatherette finish that feels soft, very clicky metal buttons, and a sapphire crystal button for Camera Control. We just wish it came in some fun colors. But the main problem? We tested it with several magnetic accessories, and while we think most will fit perfectly into the cutout area, there are a few we weren’t able to use. For example, this PopSockets battery grip wouldn’t stay attached because it’s larger than the cutout. That’s something to keep in mind if you like the idea of the open case.
Photograph: Julian Chokkattu
Bellroy Cases for $55+: We have tried three of Bellroy’s cases for the iPhone 17 range: the Venture, 3 Card, and the Innovera Edition. The Venture is our favorite of the lot. It feels rugged and durable, though the material feels very slippery (probably why it comes with a built-in wrist strap. The 3 Card phone case is very bulky, but at least it lives up to its name—it can fit three cards! However, the design disables any MagSafe connectivity and wireless charging, so that’s a no-go. The Innovera Edition is the company’s leather-alternative material made from a bio-based polymer and postconsumer recycled nylon. It has a nice texture and looks clean, with clicky buttons and decently raised edges around the display and cameras. None of these particularly blew us away, but they’re worth considering if you like the look.
Photograph: Julian Chokkattu
Bluebonnet Leather Cases for $79+: We think Bluebonnet’s best case is its no-frills Minimalist Full-Grain Leather case; there is no branding on the exterior, if you want the clean look. The Camera Control button is a nice new addition, and the other metal buttons are clicky. However, I don’t like the company’s wallet cases that much. The Wallet Case blocks wireless charging and MagSafe for an integrated card storage solution, but you can only fit two cards, and I wish there was a better way to pry them out. The Executive Wallet Case Folio can fit more cards (I was able to insert two cards into each of the two slots), and there’s a generous cash pocket. However, once you have items in there, the top piece becomes so bulky that the folio doesn’t close properly. (It’s clearly designed just to store two cards and maybe a couple of bills.) I think Nomad’s Leather folio above is the better option.
Photograph: Julian Chokkattu
Aohi Future MagArmor Pro Case for $47+: Aohi claims its case can protect your iPhone from heights up to 16 feet. Why are you that high? No idea. But this confidence comes from a reinforced aluminum-alloy camera frame, raised edges, and a non-Newtonian fluid P4U polymer that hardens on impact and reverts to being soft afterward. Unfortunately, it’s very hard for us to vet these claims and test this extreme drop protection, so you’ll have to take the company’s word for it. Frankly, at the end of the day, we are just not amazed by the case design. It looks fine? The buttons are clicky, and the magnets are quite strong.
Advertisement
Photograph: Julian Chokkattu
Aulumu A17 Cases for $40+: Aulumu’s A17 cases come in several different types, like aramid fiber or a frosted clear, and the designs are techy and fun. (Does it really need to say, “Explore Urban Tech & Future Aesthetic” on the back, though?) It’s a pretty thick case, but the camera protection is excellent, the edges around the display are raised, and the buttons are clicky. However, the buttons are a little rattly, even when the phone is in the case, which is odd. The main claim to fame here is the company’s cooling tech, with passive cooling fins to vent heat and a thermal silicone gel on the inside. After running Genshin Impact for a bit, we did see a drop in temperature of roughly 1 degree. It’s small, but not nothing. If you’re a heavy gamer, this may be helpful.
Photograph: Julian Chokkattu
Society6 Colorful Offset Checkers Case for $45: Society6 is a great place to shop for cases with fun designs, and there are tons to choose from. The company offers MagSafe cases, so make sure you choose that option when ordering. We tested the version with the dual-layer shield, which has a soft silicone liner on the inside and a hardshell exterior. The construction doesn’t feel amazing—we noticed the silicone shell sticks out a bit from the hardshell, but we were able to push it back into place. It should cover your bases, though it is specifically for anyone who prioritizes design first.
Photograph: Julian Chokkattu
Freitag F385 Circ-Case for $18: We adore Freitag’s designs for its bags and other accessories. The company reuses truck tarps for these products, giving new life to something that otherwise would have been sent to the landfill. The designs are bright and bold! The case is quite dull on its own, made from recycled ski boots. The buttons are clicky, edges are raised, but there’s no MagSafe. However, it’s designed to be used with the company’s wallets—the wallet slides into place. We can fit about two cards in there, and you use the strap to pull the cards out, which is pretty ingenious. Like most wallet cases, this is only for folks willing to forgo MagSafe and wireless charging. It’d be great if Freitag made a MagSafe version of the wallet, though!
Photograph: Julian Chokkattu
PopSockets MagSafe Cases for $40: PopSockets is known for its grips, but this is just a standard-fare case, albeit with tons of fun designs to choose from. Pictured is the Mirror Abalone, which is shiny and gorgeous, with magnets inside for solid MagSafe connectivity. It’s a fairly slim case with grippy edges and a lip around the display and camera; frankly, we don’t have much to complain about here. Oh, wait, we wish the Camera Control were a button instead of a cutout.
Advertisement
Photograph: Julian Chokkattu
OhSnap! Snap Case for $50: OhSnap! is known for its grips, but everyone has to make a case, too, it seems. The soft-touch plastic is nice, but it’s a little slippery. Once again, the aluminum buttons are rattly like some other cases we’ve tried, though at least you get extra-strength magnets baked in. We can confirm that it required a bit more effort to pull off magnetic accessories from this case than from other cases. OhSnap’s calling card, however, is its Snap Grip 5, which is a MagSafe grip that has magnets on the exterior, allowing you to attach magnetic accessories on top or even wirelessly charge the phone without having to remove the grip. It works!
OtterBox Defender Series Pro XT Case for $80: We’re so used to OtterBox’s Defender series having solid colors that the clear design here threw us off. We don’t hate it, but it does show smudges easily. (There are other styles you can choose from.) We initially advised against this case because the Camera Control button was way too responsive. Our grip would constantly activate the camera, which was annoying. That seemed to be a real problem with the case, so OtterBox sent a newer version, and we’re happy to report that this is no longer an issue. It feels just as protective thanks to its dual-layer design (a polycarbonate frame sits on top and a rubber slipcover rests underneath), and the USB-C charging port is protected. Just know that the case makes the phone considerably wider.
Nomad Leather Cases.
Photograph: Julian Chokkattu
Nomad Modern Leather Case for $55: Nomad’s leather cases look and feel great, and they’re paired with a well-built polycarbonate frame that doesn’t feel like an afterthought. There are three main case types to choose from: Modern, Traditional, and Rugged. All of them have clicky buttons, a dedicated glass button for the Camera Control instead of a cutout, and MagSafe. The Modern Leather Case is our favorite of the bunch. It uses vegetable-tanned Horween leather, but the polycarbonate frame offers extra protection around the sides of the iPhone. The Traditional Leather Case ($85) is great if you want a pure leather case. There’s no polycarbonate frame, so it won’t be as protective, but the edges around the camera module and screen are slightly more raised, and it features the same anodized aluminum buttons. The Rugged Leather Case ($75) is like the Modern case, but more protective. It has a polycarbonate frame and also adds thermoplastic urethane bumpers at the corners for extra impact protection. The edges are raised even more here to keep the glass away from surfaces.
Advertisement
Woolnut Leather Case.
Photograph: Julian Chokkattu
Woolnut Leather Case for $59: Woolnut’s case looks and feels great, and it was hard to choose between it and the Mujjo and Nomad options above. Ultimately, we just didn’t want “WOOLNUT” emblazoned on the back. Still, the full-grain Scandinavian leather feels exquisite, the aluminum buttons are responsive, and Camera Control is an actual capacitive button layered on top rather than a cutout. The edges are decently raised, and the thermoplastic urethane bumper gives it a bit more structure.
Wave MagSafe Case.
Photograph: Julian Chokkattu
Wave MagSafe Case for $48: You can see the MagSafe ring’s outline on the back of this case, which makes it look a little cheap. The Action Button is also a bit mushy, the Camera Control button is a cutout here, and the case material is slippery. But it’s otherwise fine, if a bit dull (there are at least lots of colors to choose from). The main reason to buy this case, if you don’t mind those flaws, is that this is a biodegradable case made from wheat straw. If you’re environmentally conscious and don’t want just another plastic case, recycled or not, this is a great alternative. Every purchase you make also contributes to environmental charities, like Surfers Against Sewage and 1% for the Planet.
Advertisement
Casekoo Pearl Sparkle.
Photograph: Julian Chokkattu
Casekoo Pearl Sparkle 360 Magic Stand Case for $43: It’s a bit bulky, but this sparkly, bright orange case from Casekoo (also available in tons of other designs) looks great. We love the bright, glossy TPU edges, and the sparkles on the clear back are a fun touch. It’s a nice match for the orange iPhone 17 Pro, though we didn’t have that model to test whether the color matches perfectly. There’s also a built-in kickstand with MagSafe, so you can attach magnetic accessories to the back, and it can even wirelessly charge through the ring. The kickstand has a satisfying clicking sound as you rotate it, and you can prop the iPhone up in landscape or portrait (or use it as a grip!). We prefer Zagg’s more subtle kickstand approach, but this is a loud-and-proud case worth considering.
Spigen Cases for $20+: We tried a few other Spigen cases. The Nano Pop has a fun color contrast and checks off all the boxes, though we found the rear material shows dust and smudges easily. The new Ultra Hybrid T case has stiff buttons, but is otherwise OK.
Advertisement
Twelve South Case for $50: It’s a little shocking just how bare and boring these cases are from Twelve South. We often quite enjoy Twelve South products, but these are a bit too dull for us. The silicone shell also attracts a lot of dust, though at least all the buttons are clicky, even the real button layered over Camera Control.
Burga Tough and Elite Cases for $55 and $90: We tried both the Elite and Tough cases from Burga. The main reason to buy either is that Burga has tons of designs to choose from. The cases are just OK, though. On the Elite, the buttons are a bit mushy, and Burga went with a cutout for the Camera Control button. It’s also very slippery, though at least there’s MagSafe support. On the Tough, the buttons are a little more responsive, but they stick out enough that they feel sharp as you run your fingers over the edges of the phone. The glossy plastic also feels a bit cheap.
Totallee Case.
Photograph: Julian Chokkattu
Totallee Cases for $35: Totallee, known for its ultra-slim cases, has finally come up with a naming structure for the various models it makes. The Doberman is its most protective case, with a rubber bumper around the edges, though we didn’t find it that grippy. We like the translucent design, but it’s a shame the Camera Control button is a cutout on the case. The Spy case is a clear, solid case, yet it is still extremely thin. The buttons are clicky, though access to Camera Control is still a cutout. The Scarf is Totallee’s bread and butter. You can get it in multiple colors, but this is a shockingly paper-thin case that barely feels there. Don’t expect any serious protection from it. All of these cases have non-MagSafe versions if you don’t care for the magnetic connector. They’re all totally (heh) fine cases, but we prefer the ultra-slim picks above.
Advertisement
Native Union (Re)Classic Case for $60: We like the crocodile leather-like texture of this case, and the aluminum buttons are a nice touch, though they feel slightly stiff. Unlike the Active Case we like so much, the Camera Control button here is a cutout in the case. It’s a solid option, one made from recycled materials, but the Active Case is a better buy.
Alto Wood Case.
Photograph: Julian Chokkattu
Alto Wood Case for $42+: We love a good wood case, but we have mixed feelings about Alto’s cases. You can get custom laser-carved prints, like from its Wildlife or Flora series; you can even add your own image. But these look a little tacky. Why hide that gorgeous wood? You can choose from a range of wood styles, from olive wood to cherry. We’d probably grab something from the company’s Burl & Exotic Series. The case itself is OK. The rubber bumper around the edges is grippy, but feels a little cheap. The power button is solid, and there’s a cutout for the Camera Control button, but the volume rocker feels a tiny bit mushy.
Beats Rugged Case for $79: This case is the opposite of the Beats Kickstand case listed in the avoid section below. Where that case was super slippery, this one offers a much better grip. The buttons are clicky, the display and cameras are protected, and it looks very pretty. It’s not the grippiest case, nor is it the most rugged, despite its name. We prefer the Camera Control button design on the Nomad Rugged Case, which has a thicker bumper. It’s available for the iPhone 17, iPhone 17e, iPhone 17 Pro, and iPhone 17 Pro Max.
Advertisement
BodyGuardz Performance Pro and Pulse Cases for $50+: BodyGuardz’s Pulse case is a fine option that comes in a fun matcha color and includes a wrist strap. The Camera Control button is nicely elevated. Look along the side edges, and you’ll see vents—these help disperse heat, along with the cooling gel on the inner lining. We’ve tried testing this in the past and haven’t noticed much of a difference in gaming performance on the phone. The directional speaker is something that does actually work. Basically, the case directs the audio from the rear speakers toward you instead of downward, and you can hear a marginal difference. The Performance Pro takes it to the max with larger vents, and it adds a kickstand. We just don’t like how the case feels when you hold it.
Burton Goods Heritage Leather Case.
Photograph: Julian Chokkattu
Burton Goods Heritage Leather Case for $60+: Burton Goods is from the creator of Pad & Quill, which shut down in 2023 due to bankruptcy. The company was known for its classy leather cases, and that has continued with the new brand. The Heritage will make you feel as if you’re sitting in a cozy armchair by a fireplace in an old English study. The full-grain leather feels supple (and smells great), and the stitching gives it even more character. There’s MagSafe baked in, a microfiber interior, and all the buttons are responsive. The edges are raised well around the display and Camera Plateau, too. You can pair it with the Heritage MagSafe Wallet Stand, which is a magnetic wallet with a kickstand. We were able to fit about three credit cards, though the top cover flap makes it a little hard to remove the cards.
Advertisement
Rhinoshield SolidX and Clear Cases for $38+: We have no qualms with either of these Rhinoshield cases. The SolidX is robust, thick, and protective, with clicky buttons and MagSafe. The Clear case has extremely clicky buttons that stick out quite a bit, and it feels very sturdy. There’s just not much else to them, other than the fact that the company uses a proprietary material called Mono. It’s 100 percent recycled and is essentially a single compound, making it easier to recycle.
OtterBox Symmetry Series cases.
Photograph: Julian Chokkattu
OtterBox Symmetry Series Case for $60: OtterBox’s Symmetry series is its most fun lineup because there are usually several nifty designs to choose from. Case in point, look at this adorable cactus embroidered case! It’s a fun texture to have on the back of your phone, and it’s super cute. This version is actually made from cactus leather, but other Symmetry cases are standard plastic. The basic Symmetry cases are overpriced at $60, but the embroidered versions are worth considering. While these have MagSafe baked in, the embroidery does weaken the magnetic connection. It still charged my iPhone, but I wouldn’t trust it on a MagSafe car dock.
OtterBox Commuter Series Case for $50: OtterBox’s Commuter case is simple and inoffensive. You have a few muted colors to choose from, and the dual-layer design has a rubber slipcover surrounded by a harder plastic shell. I like the rubber edges as they help with grip, too. It checks off all the boxes—even the USB-C port is covered up—but it’s just not very exciting.
Advertisement
OtterBox Sole Series Case.
Photograph: Julian Chokkattu
OtterBox Sole Series Case for $70: We actually really like the look and feel of this case. The ridged edges are grippy, and the netting-like fabric texture on the back is so satisfying to run the fingers over. It’s kind of like sandpaper, but in a good way. The cameras and display are protected, and the buttons are clicky. However, the included lanyard loop is confusing. It’s way too tiny to put on even the smallest wrists. We suspect you’re meant to affix it to a carabiner or backpack instead. If that’s your jam, you’ll like this. If not, the lanyard is removable, and you can buy another one designed for wrists.
Mous Super Thin Aramid Fibre Case for $70: Several companies now make aramid fiber ultrathin cases, and honestly, you can’t go wrong with most of them. We prefer the subtle texture of Pitaka’s case (see above), but Mous’s Super Thin is a close second, and it even comes in a clear option with MagSafe. I very much like the raised protection for the camera, though the Camera Control button is exposed, and there’s less protection on the top and bottom, unlike Pitaka’s case. As always, this sturdy case is extremely thin and won’t provide the best protection, especially for the screen, but it’ll cover the usual wear and tear. Pair it with a screen protector.
Advertisement
Thinborne Super Thin Aramid Fiber Case for $70: It’s super thin like the Pitaka and Mous aramid fiber cases, with baked-in MagSafe, but Pitaka’s designs are better. All of the buttons are exposed here, including the Camera Control. Thinborne includes a screen protector, but you have to freehand the installation as it doesn’t come with an application tool.
Zagg Milan Snap case.
Photograph: Julian Chokkattu
Zagg iPhone 17 Cases for $50+: We have tried all of Zagg’s cases, and they’re all solid, though we like the Sedona (see above) the most. Here are some thoughts on the lineup. The Crystal Palace Snap With Stand has the same great kickstand as the Sedona, as well as an actual button for Camera Control, but this case is clear. It’s a great way to show off your iPhone’s color, though it smudges easily. The Manhattan Snap ditches the kickstand and is silicone, but it attracts too much dust and lint; it is very soft, though. The Milan Snap has a fun iridescent color, and the Santa Cruz Snap With Stand has a striking, colorful bumper that’s grippy, but the Camera Control button is a cutout. The Luxe Snap might be my favorite of the lot in terms of design, with a fun texture on the back and grooved edges, but there’s no kickstand. Finally, the Rainier Case With Kickstand is the newest in Zagg’s lineup, and if you want robust protection, this one will satisfy. It’s a two-shell case with a hard and thick bumper, and seriously raised edges for maximum screen protection with extra-thick corners. Even the USB-C port is covered up. You get the same great kickstand, but the buttons are a bit mushy.
ESR Clear, Soft, and Tough Magnetic Case for $30: ESR has three versions of this case, each in a different material. The Soft employs soft-touch silicone and is quite nice, with clicky buttons and a dedicated Camera Control button. The Clear is, well, clear, and the Tough uses a hard plastic shell. None of them is particularly exciting, but what makes them unique is the built-in kickstand that surrounds the camera module. It’s a neat idea, but you can only prop these phones up in landscape orientation. Technically, you can put them upright in portrait mode, but the phone has to be upside down. Either way, the Zagg recommendation above is a much better kickstand case.
Advertisement
Smartish cases.
Photograph: Julian Chokkattu
Smartish Gripzilla, Gripmunk, and Wallet Slayer Vol. 2 Cases for $20+: These cases are nice and affordable. The Gripzilla has textured edges that make for a nice grip, though it’s nowhere near as grippy as Dbrand’s Grip case (above). The Gripmunk has some ridges to help with grip, and the Wallet Slayer Vol. 2 lets you stuff several credit cards on the back. However, the wallet interferes with MagSafe and has no magnets inside, so it cuts you off from wireless charging. It also makes the case very thick. They’re all solid cases for the money, and you should shop directly from Smartish as it has some exclusive designs on its store.
Matter HT Snap Cases for $60: Formerly known as Atom Studios, these “Snap” cases aren’t actually cases. They’re just a backing you can magnetically stick to your phone to protect the rear glass. The company offers them in clear, wood-fiber, or agave materials. They all look nice and feel great, especially the Clear version for the iPhone Air. However, we don’t see the point of these. They don’t cover the edges at all, which is where you’ll most likely see scuffs and scratches after a drop. We’d much rather go for an ultrathin case that wraps the edges of a phone, or something like the Arc Pulse.
UAG Pathfinder.
Advertisement
Photograph: Julian Chokkattu
UAG Cases for $45+: We have tested the full suite of UAG’s cases, from the Plyo and the Monarch Pro to the Metropolis LT and Plasma XTE. If we had to pick one, it’d be the Pathfinder ($60). We love the bright yellow color and the bold design, but it works. It makes us feel tactical, like we’re about to scale a building and infiltrate it. The problem with all of UAG’s cases is that they’re expensive, and none of them feature a dedicated button for Camera Control; it’s all a cutout. (We’ve just come to really prefer having an actual button on the case!) We also like the UAG Dot ($45) and its fun translucent case.
Check Out These Crossbody Straps and Lanyards
Photograph: Julian Chokkattu
Photograph: Julian Chokkattu
Apple’s Crossbody Strap is pricey, but there are so many fun colors to choose from, and you can also color-match them with your iPhone. It’s made from 100 percent recycled PET yarn, and the strap slides smoothly across your chest. Adjusting the strap is fairly easy with the stainless steel sliding mechanism. I (Julian) have a 6’4″ frame and was able to make it way too long for my body. (The max strap length is 82 inches.) It’s best paired with Apple’s official case as it has the connection points at the bottom, but you should be able to use it with cases that have lanyard holes.
Orbitkey Crossbody Strap for $35: I really did not think this strap could work. I was looking for a crossbody strap that attaches to your phone via dedicated loops on the case itself, rather than a card that sits inside your case, because those sometimes pull loose or come undone. Sadly, Orbitkey uses a card. A little reinforced loop pops out of the bottom of your phone case—you just clip a stainless steel ring that holds a 100-percent recycled polyester crossbody cord to it. I am a convert because the tab is pretty solid; I took my iPhone 17 camping with this cable so I wouldn’t accidentally leave it in the tent or on a picnic table in the rain, and it was secure and held up. The ends of the cord are also reinforced with metal tabs. It’s also cheaper than the dedicated Apple strap. So far, so good. —Adrienne So
Advertisement
Satechi OntheGo USB-C Lanyard Cable for $30: I love the thick cord of Satechi’s lanyard, and it’s big enough to comfortably wear as a crossbody. You can adjust it to be a very small loop, too. Satechi also includes two types of connectors, black and clear, so that you can use it with clear cases. It elevates the bottom slightly, but this didn’t pose any issues when I tried it with various cases. But the best part of this crossbody is that it pulls double duty. It’s a USB-C cable! Remove the tethered caps from each end of the cable, and now you can plug your phone into a USB-C adapter or device to transfer data (480 Mbps) or charge (60W max). —Julian Chokkattu
Avoid These Cases
Beats Kickstand Case: This case is available for the iPhone 17, iPhone 17 Pro, and iPhone 17 Pro Max, but not the iPhone Air or iPhone 17e. We feel bad not recommending it because it’s adorable, especially in pink, and the kickstand is super creative. Instead of embedding a kickstand into the case, the included lanyard has a pill-shaped kickstand that pops out. Place it on one of the longer edges of the iPhone, and voila, kickstand! The problem is that it doesn’t work at all in portrait orientation, so it’s limited as a kickstand case. Also, the polycarbonate case is shockingly slippery. We don’t think we’ve ever used a case more slippery. Julian was so surprised that he showed his wife, and she immediately said, “Yeah, no, I don’t like that.” That’s probably why a lanyard is included.
Mujjo Full Leather Wallet Case: We like Mujjo’s leather cases, but we don’t really like the ones with a wallet sleeve embedded into the case itself. Firstly, the sleeve barely fits my card properly, let alone three, as the company claims. It’s also really hard to take the cards out. While Mujjo has built-in magnets in the case, the magnetic connection is fairly weak because the sleeve interrupts it. Not to mention the fact that you have to remove your cards to actually use MagSafe. It just seems counterintuitive. Just get a MagSafe wallet at that point.
Advertisement
Peak Design Gnar Case: Peak Design finally came out with a new case design for its SlimLink system, and unfortunately, we don’t like it. There are textured edges on the sides, but it isn’t too grippy. The rubbery back feels out of place and picks up dust easily. There’s a port cover, but it feels flimsy, and we worry about how it will hold up after a year of use. The case also adds significant height to the top and bottom edges of the phone, and we don’t really want a longer phone. The lip around the screen is also very slim, so much so that my screen protector rises above it. You can do better for this price.
Photograph: Julian Chokkattu
Spigen Tough Armor Kickstand Case: Yes, it’s one of the cheapest kickstand cases around. But despite manufacturing this design for years, Spigen’s kickstand still feels so flimsy, and it only works in landscape orientation. We have no idea how it’s so hard to make a kickstand that does both. We’re also not a fan of how the case looks.
Smartish Wallet Slayer Vol. 1: This is an odd case. The wallet sleeve on the back is really tight, and we had trouble stuffing two cards in. Taking them out isn’t easy either because they get stuck on the edge. Smartish also advertises a kickstand, but there is no kickstand on the case. Instead, you’re supposed to use your own credit card as the kickstand, which is just a little weird.
UAG Trooper Case: Cases are so good these days, which is why it’s annoying when there’s an obvious flaw in a design. UAG’s Trooper is a rugged, tough case that is very bulky. Yet instead of adding a button for Camera Control, the company kept a cutout. But when the edge is so thick, it’s genuinely hard to press this button, even if the back edge is sloped in. The volume rocker and Action Button are also hard to press.
Advertisement
OtterBox Defender Series Case: We can’t fault this OtterBox Defender for doing what it does best: Being exceedingly durable. It has a belt holster, rugged bumper covers, a few different colors, and a two-piece frame. We can fault it for its infuriating Action Button flap, though. One of the neatest features of newer iPhones is the Action Button, and this case turns said button from a convenient, customizable companion into an inaccessible, cumbersome feature that requires two hands to use. Absolutely not.
The Trump administration is reportedly considering an executive order to create a working group that could review advanced AI models before public release. The shift follows concerns over Anthropic’s powerful Mythos model and its cyber capabilities, with officials weighing whether the government should get early access to frontier models without necessarily blocking their release. The New York Times reports: In meetings last week, White House officials told executives from Anthropic, Google and OpenAI about some of those plans, people briefed on the conversations said. The working group is likely to consider a number of oversight approaches, officials said. But a review process could be similar to one being developed in Britain, which has assigned several government bodies to ensure that A.I. models meet certain safety standards, people in the tech industry and the administration said.
The discussions signal a stark reversal in the Trump administration’s approach to A.I. Since returning to office last year, Mr. Trump has been a major booster of the technology, which he has said is vital to winning the geopolitical contest against China. Among other moves, he swiftly rolled back a Biden administration regulatory process that asked A.I. developers to perform safety evaluations and report on A.I. models with potential military applications. “We’re going to make this industry absolutely the top, because right now it’s a beautiful baby that’s born,” Mr. Trump said of A.I. at an event in July. “We have to grow that baby and let that baby thrive. We can’t stop it. We can’t stop it with politics. We can’t stop it with foolish rules and even stupid rules.” Mr. Trump left room for some rules, but he added that “they have to be more brilliant than even the technology itself.”
The White House wants to avoid any political repercussions if a devastating A.I.-enabled cyberattack were to occur, people in the tech industry and the administration said. The administration is also evaluating whether new A.I. models could yield cyber-capabilities that could be useful to the Pentagon and U.S. intelligence agencies, they said. To get ahead of models like Mythos, some officials are pushing for a review system that would give the government first access to A.I. models, but that would not block their release, people briefed on the talks said.
If you want to overthrow Big Tech, you’ll need Section 230. The paradigm shift being built with the Open Social Web can put communities back in control of social media infrastructure, and finally end our dependency on enshittified corporate giants. But while these incumbents can overcome multimillion-dollar lawsuits, the small host revolution could be picked off one by one without the protections offered by 230.
The internet as we know it is built on Section 230, a law from the 90s that generally says internet users are legally responsible for their own speech — not the services hosting their speech. The purpose of 230 was to enable diverse forums for speech online, which defined the early internet. These scattered online communities have since been largely captured by a handful of multi-billion dollar companies that found profit in controlling your voice online. While critics are rightly concerned about this new corporate influence and surveillance, some look to diminishing Section 230 as the nuclear option to regain control.
The thing is, that would be a huge gift to Big Tech, and detrimental to our best shot at actually undermining corporate and state control of speech online.
Dethroning Big Tech
We’re fed up with legacy social media trapping us in walled gardens, where the world’s biggest companies like Google and Meta call the shots. Our communities, and our voices, are being held hostage as billionaires’ platforms surveil, betray, and censor us. We’re not alone in this frustration, and fortunately, people are collaborating globally to build another way forward: the Open Social Web.
Advertisement
This new infrastructure puts the public’s interest first by reclaiming the principles of interoperability and decentralization from the early internet. In short, it puts protocols over platforms and lets people own their connections with others. Whether you choose a Fediverse app like Mastodon or an ATmosphere app like Bluesky, your audience and community stay within reach. It’s a vision of social media akin to our lives offline: you decide who to be in touch with and how, and no central authority can threaten to snuff out those connections. It’s social media for humans, not advertisers and authoritarians.
Behind that vision is a beautiful mess of protocols bringing the open social media web to life. Each protocol is a unique language for applications, determining how and where messages are sent. While this means there is great variety to these projects, it also means everyone who spins up a server, develops an app, or otherwise hosts others’ speech has skin in the game when it comes to defending Section 230.
What exactly is Section 230?
Section 230 protects freedom of expression online by protecting US intermediaries that make the internet work. Passed in 1996 to preserve the new bubbling communities online, 230 enshrined important protections for free expression and the ability to block or filter speech you don’t want on your site. One portion is credited as the “26 words that created the internet”:
“No provider or user of an interactive computer service shall be treated as the publisher or speaker of any information provided by another information content provider.”
In other words, this bipartisan law recognizes that speech online relies on intermediaries — services that deliver messages between users — and holding them potentially liable for any message they deliver would only stifle that speech. Intuitively, when harmful speech occurs, the speaker should be the one held accountable. The effect is that most civil suits against users and services based on others’ speech can quickly be dismissed, avoiding the most expensive parts of civil litigation.
Advertisement
Section 230 was never a license to host anything online, however. It does not protect companies that create illegal or harmful content. Nor does Section 230 protect companies from intellectual property claims.
What Section 230 has enabled, however, is the freedom and flexibility for online communities to self-organize. Without the specter of one bad actor exposing the host(s) to serious legal threats, intermediaries can moderate how they see fit or even defer to volunteers within these communities.
Why the Open Social Web Needs Section 230
The superpower of decentralized systems like the Fediverse is the ability for thousands of small hosts to each shoulder some of the burdens of hosting. No single site can assert itself as a necessary intermediary for everyone; instead, all must collaborate to ensure messages reach the intended audience. The result is something superior to any one design or mandate. It is an ecosystem that is greater than the sum of its parts, resilient to disruptions, and free to experiment with different approaches to community governance.
The open social web’s kryptonite though, is the liability participants can face as intermediaries. The greater the potential liability, the more interference from powerful interests in the form of legal threats, more monetary costs, and less space for nuance in moderation. And in practice, participants may simply stop hosting to avoid those risks. The end result is only the biggest and most resourced options can survive.
Advertisement
This isn’t just about the hosts in the Open Social Web, like Mastodon instances or Bluesky PDSes. In the U.S., Section 230’s protections extend to internet users when they distribute another person’s speech. For example, Section 230 protects a user who forwards an email with a defamatory statement. On the open social web, that means when you pass along a message to others through sharing, boosting, and quoting, you’re not liable for the other user’s speech. The alternative would be a web where one misclick could open you up to a defamation lawsuit.
Section 230 also applies to the infrastructure stack, too, like Internet service providers, content delivery networks, domain, and hosting providers. Protections even extend to the new experimental infrastructures of decentralized mesh networks.
Beyond the existential risks to the feasibility of indie decentralized projects in the United States, weakening 230 protections would also make services worse. Being able to customize your social media experience from highly curated to totally laissez-faire in the open social web is only possible when the law allows space for private experiments in moderation approaches. The algorithmically driven firehose forced on users by antiquated social media giants is driven by the financial interests of advertisers, and would only be more tightly controlled in a post-230 world.
Defending 230
Laws aimed at changing 230 protections put decentralized projects like the open social web in a uniquely precarious position. That is why we urge lawmakers to take careful consideration of these impacts. It is also why the proponents and builders of a better web must be vigilant defenders of the legal tools that make their work possible.
Advertisement
The open social web embodies what we are protecting with Section 230. It’s our best chance at building a truly democratic public interest internet, where communities are in control.
The New York Timesreports that the White House may create a new working group to oversee AI development. A federal review of new AI models ahead of their public release is being considered as a possible power for that committee, according to the publication’s sources.
No clear approach has been decided, but the Times suggested it could mimic what’s currently happening within the UK government, where multiple layers of oversight confirm that AI models meet safety standards. (Although the UK has recently been having its own drama about AI regulation.) There’s also still a chance the entire concept fizzles and comes to nothing.
If an oversight group is created, it would mark quite a reversal from the hands-off attitude presented in the White House’s previously introduced AI Action Plan. The plan appeared willing to offer the AI companies most of the concessions they wanted, although it did leave a lot of potential to create plenty of new problems.
Advertisement
Regulation for a technology industry that suredoesgetsued a lot seems worthwhile. Whether this administration is capable of making good decisions about that regulation is a different question.
The remains of a gimbal camera after its drone was shot down. (Credit: Le labo de Michel, YouTube)
The Iranian Shahed-136’s basic design has seen many changes and additions since Russia began using them, with some featuring interesting payloads such as cameras in a gimbal, making these drones useful for tasks like surveillance. Recently [Michel] got his hands one one such camera that was recovered from a shot-down drone in Ukraine, providing the opportunity for an in-depth look at what hardware is in these cameras.
The teardown thus covers the gimbal mechanism itself as well as the electronics and camera. First up is an Artix-7 FPGA-based board, followed by the range finder assembly. Unsurprisingly the camera feed handling is performed by an Hi3519 SoC, as this appears to be the off-the-shelf option you find all over on AliExpress and similar sites. There’s also an Artix-7 FPGA-based board here, which presumably performs some machine vision tasks or similar.
Continuing the ‘bought off AliExpress’ vibe, the power supply board (pictured above) is quite literally just that. A relay board follows the same pattern, with apparently the entire contents of the camera consisting of off-the-shelf development boards and modules that are readily found for sale online.
For the camera there is a thermal camera presumably for night operations, as most of these drone swarms are launched towards Ukraine at night. Looking at the gimbal assembly it similarly feels like it was sourced off AliExpress, featuring mostly Western components, sometimes with the typical lasered-off component markings and such.
Advertisement
This makes one wonder how much has changed here since nearly two years ago we saw an air data computer from a similar drone that could have been sourced off AliExpress, while the Russian missile teardowns show significantly more custom hardware, presumably because those are harder to source off AliExpress.
Google’s long-running face unlock comeback story may have hit another wall. A recent Pixel 11 series leak claims that Project Toscana, Google’s rumored infrared face unlock system, likely will not debut on the Pixel 11 lineup because it is still not ready for release.
The feature was expected to give future Pixel phones a stronger rival to Apple’s Face ID. Earlier reports said Project Toscana was tested on both Pixel phones and Chromebooks, with Face ID-like speed and better low-light performance. The latest leak suggests Pixel users may have to wait beyond the 2026 lineup for that upgrade.
Nadeem Sarwar / Digital Trends
Is Google delaying its Face ID rival again?
Based on the latest Pixel 11 leak, yes. Project Toscana is now said to be unlikely for the Pixel 11 series, even though Google was reportedly testing the system for months.
The system was described as an iPhone-like face unlock setup using hybrid near-infrared sensors and possible under-display infrared hardware. It was meant to improve speed, security, and low-light unlocking, areas where Apple’s Face ID still has an advantage.
Google has already tried a serious face unlock system on Pixel phones. The Pixel 4 series used dedicated hardware, including Soli radar, to sense when a user was reaching for the phone and prepare face authentication before the screen was fully active. Google said the system worked in almost any orientation and could be used for secure payments and app sign-ins.
Advertisement
The feature quickly ran into trouble. Soon after launch, users found that the Pixel 4 could unlock even when a person’s eyes were closed, raising security concerns. Google later issued an update that added an “eyes open” requirement, but the company moved away from dedicated 3D face unlock hardware after the Pixel 4 generation.
Android Headlines
Why does this sting for Pixel fans?
Newer Pixel phones brought face unlock back in a more limited form. Project Toscana looked like Google’s chance to close that gap and bring a hardware-backed face unlock system to future Pixels.
The same Pixel 11 leak still points to several hardware changes. The lineup is expected to use the Tensor G6 chip, new cameras, brighter OLED displays, a MediaTek M90 modem, and an RGB LED array in the camera bar on Pro models. The leak also claims the thermometer may be removed from the Pixel 11 Pro, Pixel 11 Pro XL, and Pixel 11 Pro Fold.
The delay is disappointing, but a rushed launch would be worse. Face unlock is not just a convenience feature when it is tied to payments, banking apps, and device security. If Project Toscana needs more time, the next Pixel generation is a better landing place than a half-ready rollout. For privacy and security, it should arrive only when it works correctly and feels bulletproof.
A severe security vulnerability affecting almost every version of the Linux operating system has caught defenders off-guard and scrambling to patch after security researchers publicly released exploit code that allows attackers to take complete control of vulnerable systems.
The U.S. government says the bug, dubbed “CopyFail,” is now being exploited in the wild, meaning it’s being actively used in malicious hacking campaigns.
The bug, officially tracked as CVE-2026-31431 and discovered in Linux kernel versions 7.0 and earlier, was disclosed to the Linux kernel security team in late March, and patched after about a week. But the patches have yet to fully trickle down to the many Linux distributions that rely on the vulnerable kernel, leaving any system running an affected Linux version at risk of compromise.
Linux is widely used in enterprise settings, running the computers that operate much of the world’s data centers.
Advertisement
The CopyFail website says that the same short Python script “roots every Linux distribution shipped since 2017.” According to security firm Theori, which discovered CopyFail, the vulnerability was verified in several widely used versions of Linux including Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10.1, Ubuntu 24.04 (LTS), Amazon Linux 2023, as well as SUSE 16.
DevOps engineer and developer Jorijn Schrijvershof wrote in a blog post that the exploit works on Debian and Fedora versions, as well as Kubernetes, which relies on the Linux kernel. Schrijvershof described the bug as having an “unusually big blast radius” as it works on “nearly every modern distribution” of Linux.
The bug is called CopyFail because the affected component in the Linux kernel, the core of the operating system that has virtually complete access to the entire device, does not copy certain data when it should. This corrupts sensitive data within the kernel, allowing the attacker to piggyback the kernel’s access to the rest of the system, including its data.
If exploited, the bug is particularly problematic because it allows a regular, limited-access user to gain full-administrator access on an affected Linux system. A successful compromise of a server in a data center could allow an attacker to gain access to every application, server, and database of numerous corporate customers, and potentially gain access to other systems on the same network or data center.
Advertisement
The CopyFail bug cannot be exploited over the internet on its own, but can be weaponized if used in conjunction with an exploit that works over the internet. Per Microsoft, if the CopyFail bug is chained together with another vulnerability that can be delivered over the internet, an attacker could use the flaw to gain root access to an affected server. A user operating a Linux computer with a vulnerable kernel could also be tricked into opening a malicious link or attachment that triggers the vulnerability.
The bug could also be injected by way of supply chain attacks, in which malicious actors hack into an open source developer’s account and plant the malware in their code in order to compromise a large number of devices in one go.
Given the risk to the federal enterprise network, U.S. cybersecurity agency CISA has ordered all civilian federal agencies to patch any affected systems by May 15.
When you purchase through links in our articles, we may earn a small commission. This doesn’t affect our editorial independence.
A Panthalassa wave energy system. (LinkedIn Photo)
Wave energy had largely been bobbing around in the background of the U.S. clean energy sector — until now. On Monday, Oregon-based Panthalassaannounced a $140 million round led by Peter Thiel.
The new funding from the PayPal co-founder and others will allow the startup to finish building its pilot manufacturing facility near Portland. Panthalassa is developing technology that pairs wave power generated by massive floating orbs with onsite AI computing. The systems transmit data via low-Earth-orbit satellites.
“We’ve built a technology platform that operates in the planet’s most energy-dense wave regions, far from shore, and turns that resource into reliable clean power,” said Garth Sheldon-Coulson, Panthalassa’s co-founder and CEO, in a statement. “We’re now ready to build factories, deploy fleets, and provide a sustainable new source of energy for humanity.”
The planet is scrambling to find new energy sources to meet demand from data centers and electrified transportation, building heating and cooling, and industrial applications.
One of the biggest challenges historically with wave power is the need to build costly infrastructure to move energy from the ocean to where it’s needed. Panthalassa’s approach sidesteps that problem by using power onsite to run already-trained AI models, while tapping cold ocean water to cool the hardware — solving two problems at once.
Advertisement
The strategy shares parallels with surging interest in space-based data centers that harness solar energy. In March, Starcloud, a Redmond, Wash.-based startup, announced $170 million in new funding, vaulting it to unicorn status with a $1.1 billion valuation.
“The future demands more compute than we can imagine,” said Peter Thiel. “Extra-terrestrial solutions are no longer science fiction. Panthalassa has opened the ocean frontier.”
A Panthalassa energy system in port. (LinkedIn Photo)
Founded in 2016 as a public benefit corporation, Panthalassa has spent nearly a decade developing power generation, propulsion, autonomous operations and computing technology. That work has included prototypes — Ocean-1, Ocean-2 and Wavehopper — deployed in sea trials in 2021 and 2024. The company is now preparing to deploy its Ocean-3 pilot series this year, with commercial systems planned for 2027.
Sheldon-Coulson previously served as a senior investment associate at Bridgewater Associates. Chief Innovation Officer Brian Moffat, listed as a co-founder by Lowercarbon Capital, developed a novel wave energy system for Spindrift Energy before launching Panthalassa. The company has approximately 108 employees, according to PitchBook.
Other Pacific Northwest companies pursuing wave energy include Seattle’s Oscilla Power and Oregon State University spinout C-Power. Wave energy startups that have exceeded $100 million in investment globally include Sweden’s CorPower Ocean and the United Kingdom’s Marine Power Systems.
Advertisement
The Series B round included participation from new investors John Doerr, Marc Benioff’s TIME Ventures, Max Levchin’s SciFi Ventures, Susquehanna Sustainable Investments, Hanwha Group, Anthony Pratt, Fortescue Ventures, Future Positive, WTI, Nimble Partners, Super Micro Computer, Sozo Ventures, Dylan Field, Planetary VC, Leblon Capital, Resilience Reserve, Portland Seed Fund, and the Intrepid Oregon Fund.
Returning investors include Founders Fund, Gigascale Capital, Lowercarbon Capital, Unless and WovenEarth. Panthalassa previously raised $78 million, according to PitchBook.
Hackers have been exploiting a critical vulnerability (CVE-2026-22679) in the Weaver E-cology office automation since mid-March to run discovery commands.
The attacks started five days after the software vendor released a security update to address the issue, and two weeks before disclosing it publicly.
Researchers at threat intelligence company Vega documented the malicious activity and reported that the attacks lasted roughly a week, each with several distinct phases.
Weaver E-cology is an enterprise office automation (OA) and collaboration platform used for workflows, document management, HR, and internal business processes. The product is primarily used by Chinese organizations.
Advertisement
CVE-2026-22679 is a critical unauthenticated remote code execution flaw affecting E-cology 10.0 builds prior to March 12.
The flaw is caused by an exposed debug API endpoint that improperly allows user-supplied parameters to reach backend Remote Procedure Call (RPC) functionality without authentication or input validation.
This lets attackers pass crafted values that are ultimately executed as system commands on the server, effectively turning the endpoint into a remote command execution interface.
According to Vega, the attackers first checked for remote code execution (RCE) capabilities by triggering ping commands from the Java process to a Goby-linked callback, and then proceeded to multiple PowerShell-based payload downloads. However, all these were blocked by endpoint defenses.
Advertisement
Next, they attempted to deploy a target-aware MSI installer (fanwei0324.msi), but this failed to execute properly, and no follow-up activity was observed.
After those failed attempts, the attackers reverted to the RCE endpoint, using obfuscated and fileless PowerShell to repeatedly fetch remote scripts.
Throughout all attack phases, the threat actors executed reconnaissance commands, such as whoami, ipconfig, and tasklist.
Activity timeline Source: Vega
Vega explains that although the attackers had the RCE opportunity by exploiting CVE-2026-22679, they never established a persistent session on the targeted host.
Users of Weaver E-cology 10.0 are recommended to apply the security updates available through the vendor’s site as soon as possible.
Advertisement
“Every attacker process we observed is parented by java.exe (Weaver’s Tomcat-bundled Java Virtual Machine), with no preceding authentication,” explained Vega, adding that “the vendor fix (build 20260312) removes the debug endpoint entirely.”
No alternative mitigations or workarounds are listed in the official bulletin, so upgrading is the only recommendation.
AI chained four zero-days into one exploit that bypassed both renderer and OS sandboxes. A wave of new exploits is coming.
At the Autonomous Validation Summit (May 12 & 14), see how autonomous, context-rich validation finds what’s exploitable, proves controls hold, and closes the remediation loop.
Sony, owner of the PlayStation brand, has been accused of antitrust practices. The lawsuit was originally settled in 2024 but was rejected twice during the approval process. Last week, a judge approved a preliminary reopening of the settlement.
The suit, brought before the San Francisco division of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, accuses the company of allegedly limiting third-party retailers from selling PlayStation titles via “game-specific vouchers.” That means preventing customers from buying games elsewhere and forcing them to make digital purchases solely on Sony’s PlayStation Network, where it controls prices without worrying about competitors.
The settlement means the company won’t admit to any wrongdoing, but it will have to pay nearly $8 million to affected players. Unfortunately, that might take quite a while.
Here’s what to know about the settlement and whether you’ll be able to get any money out of it. (The full details are at the PlayStation Digital Games Settlement website.)
Advertisement
Am I Eligible for a Payout?
If you bought a digital game on PlayStation Network between April 1, 2019, and December 31, 2023, then yes, you are likely eligible for a cut of the settlement.
What Games Are Covered?
You can find a full list here of games that are eligible for a settlement payout.
If you’ve played anything around that time and bought it from the PSN store, chances are you’ll have a shot at being included. Games include The Last of Us, Resident Evil 4, and lots of sports games, such as several generations of Madden, NBA 2K, and FIFA
How Do I Get Paid?
Thankfully, you won’t have to do very much. When the settlement finally goes through, the funds will be deposited into the payment accounts linked to all of the eligible PSN profiles.
Advertisement
If you’d like to exclude yourself from the payout, or object to it entirely, you can do so by filing out a written request. That’s not necessary unless you have a moral issue with the payout, or you plan to sue Sony about this very same issue later. Accepting the payout now by default means you waive the right to sue Sony for this in the future.
What If I Don’t Have My PSN Account Anymore?
If your PSN account is deactivated or otherwise MIA, but you know you’ve bought games that meet the conditions of this settlement, you still have options for getting some recompense. You can call (877) 777-9145 or email [email protected]. You can also send your qualifying purchase information and current address to:
PSN Digital Game Settlement P.O. Box 17304 Milwaukee, WI 53217
The deadline to submit that request for a check is August 27, 2026.
Advertisement
How Much Money Will I Get?
Probably not a lot. That $7.85 million will be split across legal representatives who argued the settlement, then evenly spread across potentially millions of people’s PSN accounts. It’s hard to tell exactly how much that will amount to, but it’s likely to be a few dollars at best.
I’ll Take What I Can Get. When Will That Cash Roll In?
The settlement hearing won’t happen until after a so-called fairness hearing takes place, which is currently scheduled for October 15, 2026. If that is finalized, the money could take additional weeks or months to be doled out.
Class action lawsuits aren’t super consumer-friendly most of the time. They certainly don’t tend to be timely. This particular settlement was first arranged in December 2024, but two requests for approval had been rejected. The language in the settlement originally said the payments would be distributed after April 1, 2025. As you can probably tell, the wait isn’t over yet.
A long-serving military vessel is a unique piece of a country’s naval history. Sadly, several iconic U.S. Navy ships are set to be decommissioned in 2026, and still others are stuck in increasingly delayed renovation projects. The formidable U.S.S. Dwight D. Eisenhower aircraft carrier, however, is finally set to return to naval service.
This huge Nimitz-class carrier, measuring 1,092 feet long and displacing 101,600 long tons, will mark its 50th birthday in 2027. With aircraft carriers being such a crucial component of global power projection, the venerable ship was returned to Virginia’s Norfolk Naval Shipyard in January 2025, for an extensive period of PIA (Planned Incremental Availability).
Advertisement
This is an extended inspection, evaluation, and modernization process, a daunting job for a vessel of this size. It was completed ahead of schedule in April 2026, and Commander Jason Downs, Project Superintendent, hailed the collaborative effort. He said, a Navy release reports, “The entirety of the project team mustered more than 4,000 people daily, all with one common vision–deliver IKE, fully mission capable, back to the fleet before our commitment date.”
The extensive effort included unique tasks like repairing and improving the carrier’s catapult system, a vital feature that allows for the launch of aircraft. Commander Downs went on to boast that this was “the SECOND consecutive early finish of an aircraft carrier availability at Norfolk Naval Shipyard,” with U.S.S. George H.W. Bush’s own period of PIA concluding in late 2024.
Advertisement
U.S.S Dwight D. Eisenhower’s long career to date
U.S.S. Dwight D. Eisenhower was christened in October 1975, by Mamie Doud-Eisenhower herself. Commissioned two years later, it operated in the Red Sea in 1990 and during Operation Desert Storm the following year. It remained active throughout the 1990s, with a role in other key operations including Operations Uphold Democracy, Southern Watch, and Deny Flight, the latter being a NATO effort to maintain the no-fly zone in Bosnian airspace.
Into the 2000s and 2010s, it would be deployed during Operations Enduring Freedom and Inherent Resolve. Between February and August 2020, its courageous crew remained aboard, achieving a new record for continuous time spent at sea without docking: 260 days. It was called upon again in 2021 and 2023, for Operations including Inherent Resolve and Prosperity Guardian.
It’s been a stalwart presence in the oceans for almost half a century, and its newly completed period of intensive maintenance and refitting was not its first. A previous period of PIA started in August 2022 and lasted for just over a year. It’s been treated to a lot of maintenance and upgrades over its long career, with an October 1985 to April 1987 stop in Newport News Shipbuilding perhaps being the most significant. During this period, it was equipped with an Anti-Submarine Warfare Module, NATO Sea Sparrow Missiles, and a range of sophisticated communications features.
Advertisement
The U.S.S. Dwight D. Eisenhower may not be the most advanced aircraft carrier in the world, but it’s a sophisticated model and powerhouse nonetheless. The next chapter in its history is sure to be significant, wherever it’s deployed next.
You must be logged in to post a comment Login