Connect with us
DAPA Banner
DAPA Coin
DAPA
COIN PAYMENT ASSET
PRIVACY · BLOCKDAG · HOMOMORPHIC ENCRYPTION · RUST
ElGamal Encrypted MINE DAPA
🚫 GENESIS SOLD OUT
DAPAPAY COMING

Crypto World

World Liberty Sues Justin Sun for Defamation in WLFI Dispute

Published

on

Crypto Breaking News

World Liberty Financial has filed a defamation lawsuit in Florida against Justin Sun, the Tron founder, intensifying a public fight between the Trump-family-backed crypto platform and one of its largest investors. The Eleventh Judicial Circuit Court in Miami-Dade County is the venue for the complaint, which accuses Sun of making false public statements about WLFI and of violating the project’s token-sale terms through alleged prohibited transfers, short-selling and straw purchases. The filing seeks a court-ordered retraction and damages.

Sun responded on X, describing the lawsuit as a “meritless PR stunt” and saying he looked forward to defeating the case in court. The action comes less than two weeks after Sun sued World Liberty over the freezing of his WLFI tokens, underscoring a broader clash over token controls and governance at WLFI.

In the broader context, WLFI has faced increasing scrutiny over its governance structure and the power dynamics surrounding its token. The project previously drew attention for a governance proposal to extend the lock-up period for early investors by an additional two years, a move Sun publicly labeled as “one of the most absurd governance scams I have ever seen.”

The WLFI project also bears political connections in its branding. The platform’s white paper identifies former President Donald Trump and his sons, Donald Trump Jr. and Eric Trump, as co-founders of the project, a detail WLFI has used to frame its narrative and investor outreach.

Advertisement

Key takeaways

  • WLFI accuses Justin Sun of disseminating false statements about the project and of violating token-sale terms, seeking a retraction and damages via a court filing in Miami-Dade County.
  • Sun publicly rejects the allegations, calling the lawsuit a “meritless PR stunt” and vowing to prevail in court.
  • The defamation case follows Sun’s separate suit against WLFI over the alleged freezing of his WLFI tokens, highlighting a broader dispute over token controls and governance.
  • WLFI governance and central-control concerns have resurfaced after a controversial March vote that WLFI said concentrated voting power in a small number of wallets, a claim Sun criticized as risky for holders.
  • Market data show WLFI’s price has been volatile: the token rose about 5% in the 24 hours before a recent session but remains more than 80% down from its launch, reflecting investor caution around the platform’s governance and legal exposure.

Legal clash sharpens WLFI-Sun confrontation

The defamation complaint contends that Sun publicly characterized WLFI in a way that harmed the project’s reputation and, by extension, its investors. WLFI’s filing states that Sun engaged in statements viewed as defamatory and that he violated terms of sale tied to WLFI’s token distribution. The document requests a formal retraction and monetary damages intended to compensate WLFI and its employees for reputational harm.

Sun rejected the allegations in a Monday post on X, framing the suit as a calculated attempt to silence him. “This is a meritless PR stunt,” Sun wrote, signaling his expectation to contest the claims in court. The public flare-up sits on the heels of Sun’s own legal action against WLFI in which he challenges what he sees as an improper freeze on his WLFI holdings.

Governance under the microscope: concentration, votes, and the two-year hook

The WLFI governance saga has been a persistent thread in the controversy surrounding the project. In a prior development, WLFI proposed extending the lock-up window for early investors by two more years, a move that drew opposition from Sun. He described the proposal as a governance scheme that undermined investor rights and transparency.

Complicating the discourse is a March governance vote that WLFI described as indicating a troubling concentration of influence: WLFI said 76% of voting power came from just ten wallets. Sun dismissed the concentration claim as a serious red flag around centralized control and potential manipulation of governance outcomes. WLFI has defended its stance, while Sun’s team has threatened legal action in response to what they describe as mischaracterizations and attempts to obscure its own conduct.

The white paper for WLFI lists Donald Trump and his sons as co-founders, a detail that feeds into the project’s branding and investor outreach. The arrangement has invited scrutiny about governance legitimacy and the degree to which the project’s leadership can be considered representative of the broader WLFI community, especially as token control and freezing rights come under public debate.

Advertisement

Key moments in the ongoing dispute include Sun’s acknowledgement that WLFI’s freezing authority exists as part of the project’s risk-management framework, and WLFI’s insistence that Sun was aware of this power when he participated in the presale. The lawsuit contends that Sun’s later statements about freezing as a “trap door” were defamatory attempts to harm WLFI’s standing and to influence price and market sentiment to Sun’s financial benefit.

Token controls, freezing rights, and investor implications

Sun’s WLFI address was blacklisted in September 2025 after blockchain monitoring platforms flagged a substantial transfer, a discovery Sun later framed as an unwarranted seizure of his investment. Sun has argued that his tokens were frozen improperly, urging WLFI to unlock his holdings. WLFI’s filing counters that Sun was fully aware of the platform’s right to freeze user tokens to safeguard token holders and the community, and that he had previously agreed to the project’s Terms of Sale.

Tom Clare, the attorney representing World Liberty Financial, framed the filing as a necessary measure to protect WLFI’s tokenholders and employees. He said Sun opted to defame WLFI instead of engaging in constructive discourse, describing the legal action as a “last resort” to defend the project’s governance and integrity.

The battle over freezing rights and governance decisions is not simply a civil dispute; it sits at the intersection of investor protections, platform governance, and the reputational risk that comes from association with high-profile political branding. WLFI argues that its actions were legitimate governance tools designed to protect holders, while Sun argues that the safeguards have been weaponized against him and potentially manipulated to his detriment.

Advertisement

Market data reflect a cautious sentiment around WLFI. According to CoinMarketCap, WLFI rose about 5% in the 24-hour window leading up to a recent session, yet the token remains down more than 80% since its launch. The price trajectory underscores the broader investor concerns about governance transparency, token utility, and the legal entanglements surrounding the project.

What to watch next for WLFI and the broader ecosystem

The unfolding legal battle will test WLFI’s governance framework, particularly its ability to balance protective controls with transparent, accountable decision-making that stands up to regulatory and investor scrutiny. The case will likely cast a long shadow over WLFI’s reputation, its relationship with high-profile backers, and the perceived legitimacy of its tokenomics and sale terms.

Observers will want to monitor whether the court orders a retraction and damages, how Sun’s defense unfolds, and whether WLFI can demonstrate a robust governance model that can withstand public scrutiny and investor risk assessments. The dynamic also raises questions for other projects with centralized control features or branding that ties to political figures, as real-world governance and legal accountability become increasingly central to investor confidence in crypto platforms.

Next steps are unclear in terms of timing, but the outcomes could influence WLFI’s token-holders, existing investors, and potential future backers. Investors should watch for court filings, responses from Sun, and any shifts in WLFI’s governance proposals or risk-management disclosures as the litigation progresses.

Advertisement

Sources and references for the ongoing coverage include WLFI’s court filing and public statements, Sun’s posts on X, prior Cointelegraph reporting on WLFI’s governance and token-freeze disputes, and WLFI’s white paper detailing its claimed founders and governance framework. Readers are encouraged to verify information through the linked materials as cases develop.

Risk & affiliate notice: Crypto assets are volatile and capital is at risk. This article may contain affiliate links. Read full disclosure

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Crypto World

Evernorth Says Banks Already Using XRP for EURCV

Published

on

Brian Armstrong's Bold Prediction: AI Agents Will Soon Dominate Global Financial

TLDR

  • Evernorth stated that real banks are already using XRP through regulated stablecoin issuance.
  • Société Générale launched its EURCV stablecoin on the XRP Ledger and other public blockchains.
  • EURCV operates under the European Union’s MiCA regulatory framework.
  • Evernorth said the next 18 months will determine scale, chain selection, and compliance models.
  • The firm emphasized that adoption will occur through gradual product launches by regulated institutions.

Evernorth said established banks already use public blockchains for regulated products, including XRP. The firm pointed to Société Générale’s EURCV stablecoin launch across several networks. It stated the next 18 months will determine scale, chain selection, and regulatory alignment.

XRP Selected as Société Générale Expands EURCV Across Public Chains

Evernorth referenced Société Générale’s digital asset unit, SG-FORGE, which issued the euro-backed EUR CoinVertible stablecoin. The bank deployed EURCV on the XRP Ledger, Ethereum, Stellar, and Solana. Evernorth wrote on X that “real banks are already using XRP” through regulated stablecoin issuance.

The company said EURCV ranks among the largest euro-denominated stablecoins in circulation. It explained that U.S. dollar stablecoins still dominate the market share. However, it stated Europe continues building regulated digital money infrastructure under clear supervisory rules.

Evernorth said the blockchain choice signals institutional confidence in selected networks. It stated that major banks evaluate technical stability and compliance readiness before deployment. Therefore, it described XRP’s inclusion as part of a defined infrastructure selection process.

The firm added that SG-FORGE structured EURCV under European financial regulations. It confirmed that the stablecoin operates as a fully backed digital euro instrument. As a result, it emphasized that regulated entities already use public chains for financial settlement.

MiCA Rules Shape XRP Adoption and Network Competition

Evernorth linked the rollout to the European Union’s Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation, known as MiCA. It stated that MiCA provides operational clarity for issuing and managing digital asset products. The framework became fully effective last year across EU member states.

Advertisement

The company said MiCA offers standardized licensing and disclosure requirements for stablecoin issuers. It explained that these rules give banks defined compliance pathways. Consequently, regulated institutions can deploy blockchain-based instruments within an established legal structure.

Evernorth compared MiCA with ongoing legislative efforts in the United States. It referenced proposals such as the CLARITY Act as examples of developing frameworks. However, it stated that Europe currently provides clearer operational guidance.

The firm wrote that the next 18 months will focus on measurable adoption outcomes. It said, “The next 18 months will be about how much, on which chains, and under which set of rules.” Therefore, it framed the period as a testing phase for network scalability and compliance capacity.

Evernorth said blockchain adoption will occur through incremental product launches rather than single announcements. It stated that banks will continue issuing regulated financial instruments on selected chains. The company identified the EURCV deployment as the latest confirmed step in that process.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Crypto World

CME now trades crypto 24/7. Here’s why it matters

Published

on

CME now trades crypto 24/7. Here's why it matters

On May 29, 2026, at 4:00 p.m. Central Time, CME Group flipped the switch. The world’s largest regulated derivatives exchange now trades Bitcoin and Ethereum futures and options around the clock, seven days a week, with only a short maintenance pause. 

Summary

  • CME Group now offers near-24/7 trading for crypto futures and options, with only short maintenance pauses.
  • The shift covers nine assets, including Bitcoin, Ethereum, Solana, XRP, Cardano, Chainlink, Stellar, Avalanche, and Sui.
  • Continuous trading effectively ends the recurring weekend CME gap that shaped years of Bitcoin technical analysis.
  • The change is a major institutional milestone, but weekend liquidity may remain thin until volume builds.

The change covers nine crypto assets: Bitcoin, Ethereum, Solana, XRP, Cardano, Chainlink, Stellar, Avalanche, and Sui. The first weekend saw more than 7,200 contracts traded. It sounds like a dry piece of market plumbing, and in one sense it is. 

But it quietly kills one of the most-watched quirks in all of crypto trading, the “CME gap,” and it marks a real milestone in how thoroughly traditional finance has absorbed digital assets. This piece explains what changed, why institutions pushed for it, what it does to the famous weekend gap, and the catch that most of the celebratory coverage is leaving out.

Advertisement

What actually changed

For years, CME’s crypto futures ran on traditional-market time. Trading opened Sunday evening and closed Friday afternoon, with the market shut for roughly 48 hours every weekend. That made sense for the exchange that has historically traded corn, oil, and interest-rate futures. It made much less sense for an asset class that never stops.

As of May 29, 2026, that closure is gone. CME crypto futures and options now trade nearly 24 hours a day, seven days a week, on its Globex electronic platform. The only interruptions are a two-minute maintenance window on weekdays between 4:00 and 4:02 p.m. Central Time, and a longer two-hour window on weekends. Continuous trading kicked off at 4:00 p.m. Central, which is 10:00 a.m. UTC. As close to always-on as a regulated exchange realistically gets.

Advertisement

The product roster is broad. Bitcoin futures, which CME first launched in December 2017, and Ether futures, added in 2021, anchor the lineup. Around them sit futures on Solana, XRP, Cardano, Chainlink, Stellar, Avalanche, and Sui. All of them now fall under the 24/7 umbrella, giving institutional traders continuous access to a diversified crypto derivatives portfolio on a single regulated venue. CME also rolled out Bitcoin Volatility futures, a product that lets traders position on Bitcoin’s volatility itself, available 24/7 from June 1.

The early demand was real. CME reported more than 7,200 contracts traded during the first weekend of continuous operation. Average daily volumes for crypto futures in early 2026 were already up 46 percent year-over-year, reaching around 407,200 contracts, with open interest near 335,400 contracts at launch. The weekend trading is not a token gesture. There is genuine appetite for it.

Why institutions pushed for this

The argument behind the change is simple and entirely about risk management.

A hedge fund, corporate treasury desk, or asset manager running a Bitcoin position has a problem if the main regulated futures venue closes for 48 hours every weekend. Bitcoin does not stop trading on Saturday. Spot markets and offshore venues keep moving, sometimes violently, on weekend news. But the institution holding a regulated hedge through CME could not adjust that hedge until Sunday evening. For two days every week, carefully managed exposure sat frozen while the underlying asset kept moving.

Advertisement

That gap between when risk happens and when you can hedge it is exactly what professional risk managers are paid to eliminate. Tim McCourt, CME’s Global Head of Equities, FX and Alternative Products, framed it directly, saying client demand for round-the-clock risk management had reached an all-time high and that always-on regulated markets let clients trade with confidence at any time. The institutional translation: we have clients with real money at risk who could not sleep on Friday night, and they asked us to fix it.

The ecosystem moved with CME. Robinhood’s futures chief called it the first time its users could trade regulated futures at any hour of any day. Ripple Prime, positioning itself as a futures commission merchant built for always-on markets, signed on. Wedbush, which had already been serving clients on a 24/7 basis, expanded its support. The point is that this was not CME acting alone. It was a coordinated move by the brokers and clearing firms that route institutional money into crypto derivatives, which tells you the demand was coming from their clients, not from the exchange looking for a headline.

The death of the CME gap

The most interesting casualty of this change is a piece of crypto trading folklore: the CME gap.

Advertisement

Here is how it worked. Because CME closed Friday afternoon and reopened Sunday evening, Bitcoin’s spot price would drift over the weekend while CME futures sat frozen at Friday’s closing level. When futures reopened Sunday night, the chart showed a “gap” between Friday’s close and Sunday’s open, wherever spot had wandered to in between. These gaps became a fixture of Bitcoin technical analysis. Traders watched them obsessively, because Bitcoin’s price had a well-documented tendency to later return and “fill” the gap, snapping back to that abandoned price level.

The gap became both a technical indicator and a speculative strategy. Traders would position around gap fills, betting the price would return to close them. Thin weekend liquidity made the whole thing worse, because low-volume weekend order books exaggerated moves that would frequently reverse once institutional participants logged back on late Sunday. The 11:00 p.m. UTC Sunday reopen was a recurring moment of volatility as futures recalibrated to wherever spot had gone, much of it low-volume noise rather than real price discovery.

With continuous trading, that structural quirk is, for practical purposes, extinct. There is no Friday close to gap away from and no Sunday reopen to snap back. One of the most reliably exploited inefficiencies in crypto markets just disappeared. For chart analysts who built strategies around gap fills, a tool they relied on for years is gone. For the market as a whole, it removes a recurring source of artificial weekend volatility that had little to do with fundamentals.

Why it matters beyond the gap

Strip away the trading folklore and the deeper significance is about market maturity.

Every step CME has taken in crypto, from the first Bitcoin futures in 2017 through the addition of Ether, Solana, and the rest, has been a marker of how seriously traditional finance takes the asset class. The 24/7 move is the next one. It signals that crypto derivatives have enough institutional volume and demand to justify the operational cost of running a regulated market around the clock, which is not trivial. Exchanges do not staff weekend operations and rebuild clearing schedules for an asset they consider a sideshow.

It also narrows the structural gap between regulated venues and crypto-native ones. For years, the knock on regulated crypto derivatives was that they operated on banker’s hours while the real action happened 24/7 on offshore perpetual-futures exchanges. That divide pushed a lot of volume to less-regulated venues simply because those were the only places open when the market moved. By going continuous, CME removes one of the main reasons institutional traders had to step outside the regulated system to manage weekend risk. It brings activity that had leaked offshore back toward a venue with US oversight and clearing guarantees.

There is a longer-arc reading too. The shift quietly admits that crypto’s always-on model won the argument. Traditional markets close because the institutions trading them are human and need the weekend. Crypto never adopted that convention, and rather than force crypto to conform, the largest traditional derivatives exchange reshaped itself around crypto’s clock. That is a small but telling reversal of who is adapting to whom.

Advertisement

The catch the press releases skip

Here is the part that the celebratory coverage tends to leave out: the structural gap is gone, but the liquidity is not evenly there yet.

Eliminating the weekend closure does not automatically create deep weekend markets. In the early going, liquidity on CME’s crypto products remains concentrated where it always was, during peak weekday hours and in the most-traded contracts. Weekend order books may stay thin for a while, which means volume and genuine price discovery will still cluster on weekdays even though the market is technically open all weekend. You can now trade Saturday, but you may not find a deep market to trade into.

The broader liquidity reality complicates the story further. Even with the change, the deepest pools of crypto derivatives liquidity sit elsewhere. IBIT options open interest, tied to BlackRock’s spot Bitcoin ETF, far exceeds CME’s crypto options markets, and offshore perpetual-futures venues still dominate raw volume. CME going 24/7 removes a structural inefficiency, but it does not instantly make CME the deepest place to trade crypto on a Saturday. That will depend on whether the weekend volume builds over time or stays a thin afterthought to the weekday session.

And the back office still runs on traditional time. Any trade executed over a weekend or holiday gets assigned the next business day’s date for clearing and settlement. You can trade on Saturday, but the paperwork pretends it happened Monday. It is a practical accommodation that lets CME extend trading hours without rebuilding its entire clearing infrastructure, but it is a reminder that the plumbing of traditional finance has not gone fully continuous even as the trading screen has.

Advertisement

None of this undercuts the significance of the change. It just means the honest version is “CME removed the weekend closure and the famous gap, and weekend liquidity will build from here,” not “CME weekends are now as deep as weekdays.” The structure changed instantly. The liquidity follows on its own schedule.

Where this leaves the market

CME going 24/7 is one of those changes that looks like plumbing and turns out to matter more than it first appears.

The immediate effects are concrete. The weekend closure is gone, the CME gap that shaped years of Bitcoin technical analysis is effectively extinct, and institutional traders can now hedge regulated crypto positions at any hour instead of sitting frozen through every weekend. The first-weekend volume and the 46 percent year-over-year growth in crypto futures activity show the demand was real, not theoretical.

The significance is mostly structural. This is another marker of crypto’s absorption into mainstream finance, a step that narrows the divide between regulated and crypto-native venues and pulls some weekend risk management back toward a US-overseen platform. It also quietly confirms that crypto’s always-on model reshaped the largest traditional derivatives exchange rather than the other way around.

Advertisement

The caveat is liquidity. A market being open is not the same as a market being deep. Weekend trading on CME will start thin and build only if the volume actually shows up, and the deepest crypto derivatives liquidity still sits in ETF options and offshore perpetuals rather than on CME. The structural change happened on May 29. Whether it becomes a genuinely active weekend market or stays a technically-open but lightly-used window is the thing to watch over the coming months. Either way, the era of the Bitcoin weekend gap is over, and that alone makes this a date worth remembering in the slow institutionalization of crypto.

This article is for informational purposes and does not constitute financial or investment advice. Cryptocurrency markets are highly volatile. The figures and analysis described reflect data available as of June 2, 2026. Always do your own research and consult with qualified financial professionals before making investment decisions.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Crypto World

Bitcoin Price Faces $20K Risk as Schiff Flags Complacency

Published

on

Brian Armstrong's Bold Prediction: AI Agents Will Soon Dominate Global Financial

TLDR

  • Peter Schiff warned that Bitcoin could fall below $20,000 if it breaks the $50,000 level.
  • He said excessive complacency suggests the market is not near a bottom.
  • Schiff argued that a sharp drop could push long-term holders to exit positions.
  • Strategy sold 32 BTC to fund preferred dividends while holding over 843,000 BTC.
  • CryptoQuant reported that monthly Bitcoin demand has contracted by 232,000 BTC.

Bitcoin traded near $67,000 after a 4% daily drop and a 16% monthly decline. Peter Schiff warned that a break below $50,000 could trigger a slide under $20,000. He argued that complacency, not volatility, threatens market stability.

Bitcoin Price Outlook Faces $20K Breakdown Risk

Schiff posted on X that investor sentiment shows excessive calm despite recent losses. He wrote, “There’s way too much complacency in Bitcoin for the market to be anywhere near a bottom.” He added that once Bitcoin breaks $50K, it should fall quickly below $20K. He said that such a move would pressure long-term holders to exit positions. He claimed many investors would “finally throw in the towel” after a sharp breakdown.

Earlier, Schiff questioned whether a Bitcoin crash would drag broader risk assets lower. He suggested that either outcome could redirect capital toward “value and safety.” For years, he has supported gold as a hedge during market stress. He repeated that stance while discussing current price conditions.

Schiff also targeted Strategy’s STRC preferred stock during his commentary. STRC traded below $96, pushing its yield near 12% at the time. He argued that doubts about dividend payments could drive the price lower. He described a potential need to raise the coupon as a “death spiral.”

Advertisement

Strategy recently sold 32 BTC for $2.5 million to fund preferred dividends. The company still holds over 843,000 BTC on its balance sheet. Schiff suggested that the preferred structure remains fragile despite the large holdings.

Market Reaction Splits as Analysts Cite Demand Contraction

Crypto commentator Alex Marzell dismissed Schiff’s outlook on social media. He said that a move to $20K would only test his available cash. Meanwhile, Bitget CEO Gracey Chen said she plans to buy nearly $50,000. She stated that global money printing could support commodities, including Bitcoin and gold.

Chen also flagged short-term risks affecting the Bitcoin price. She cited CPI pressure, potential rate hikes, and selling by large holders. She mentioned possible sales from Strategy and Mt. Gox creditors. She also said heavy AI-related IPOs could drain market liquidity.

CryptoQuant research head Julio Moreno reported contracting Bitcoin demand. He said monthly demand has fallen by 232,000 BTC. He stated that weakening demand, not macro factors, drives the correction.

Bitfinex published a report describing a “slow bleed” phase. The report linked price weakness to distribution and fading conviction. Moreno’s assessment aligned with that view on demand contraction.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Crypto World

George Santos under DOJ investigation over Kalshi trades tied to Trump speech

Published

on

U.S. democrats urge crackdown on potential insider trading in prediction markets

Federal investigators have opened a probe into former U.S. Representative George Santos after suspicious prediction market trades allegedly generated tens of thousands of dollars around President Donald Trump’s February State of the Union address.

Summary

  • DOJ and CFTC have opened an investigation after Kalshi flagged suspicious trades linked to former Congressman George Santos.
  • NPR reported that Santos allegedly made tens of thousands of dollars betting he would miss President Trump’s State of the Union address.
  • The case adds to growing scrutiny of insider trading risks on prediction market platforms such as Kalshi and Polymarket.

NPR reported that the Department of Justice and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission are investigating Santos after prediction market platform Kalshi detected unusual trading activity linked to a contract on whether he would attend the speech. According to NPR, Kalshi froze Santos’ account and referred the matter to regulators after reviewing the trades.

Based on NPR’s reporting, Santos allegedly wagered that he would not attend the event despite posting a video on X indicating that he planned to be present in the gallery. As President Trump delivered his address, Santos posted from an airport, after which the market’s odds on his attendance dropped sharply, NPR said.

Advertisement

People familiar with the matter told NPR that Kalshi has sought to interview Santos as part of its internal investigation. The report added that Santos has not participated in those interview requests. 

When contacted by the outlet, Santos responded, “Well, that’s news to me.”

Kalshi’s enforcement efforts face new test

Coming months after Kalshi disciplined political candidates for trading on their own races, the Santos case places renewed attention on how prediction markets police participants who may possess direct knowledge of an event’s outcome.

Back in April, Kalshi suspended three federal candidates after an internal review found they had placed bets on their own election contests. Kalshi’s head of enforcement, Robert DeNault, said at the time that candidates capable of influencing market outcomes violated exchange rules regardless of the size of their trades.

Advertisement

Those earlier cases resulted in exchange penalties but did not lead to referrals to the DOJ or the CFTC. NPR’s reporting suggests the Santos matter followed a different path, with Kalshi freezing the account and escalating the issue to regulators.

Kalshi has recently expanded measures intended to prevent market abuse. The company said it introduced screening tools designed to stop users from trading on events in which they are directly involved.

Prediction markets draw growing insider trading scrutiny

Attention from regulators has increased as several high-profile cases have raised questions about the use of nonpublic information in event-based contracts.

Advertisement

In April, federal prosecutors charged a U.S. Army Special Forces soldier with making roughly $409,881 from Polymarket bets tied to the capture of Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro. Authorities alleged the trader possessed advance knowledge connected to the operation.

More recently, the DOJ and the CFTC charged Google software engineer Michele Spagnuolo with insider trading tied to prediction markets. Prosecutors alleged that Spagnuolo used confidential Google search ranking data to place $2.7 million in bets on Polymarket, generating approximately $1.2 million in profit before the information became public.

CFTC Enforcement Director David Miller said in May that insider trading laws apply to prediction markets and rejected arguments that event contracts exist outside existing market abuse rules.

Congress has also stepped up oversight. In May, House Oversight and Government Reform Committee Chairman James Comer launched an inquiry into insider trading safeguards at Kalshi and Polymarket, seeking information about monitoring systems and enforcement practices.

Advertisement

As scrutiny has intensified, both Kalshi and Polymarket have introduced additional compliance measures. 

Kalshi has focused on identifying participants with direct involvement in market events, while Polymarket has revised its rules, expanded surveillance programs, and hired blockchain analytics firm Chainalysis to support investigations into insider trading and market manipulation.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Crypto World

It Was All There: High Leverage and a Rare BTC Sale Behind the June Crypto Crash

Published

on

Futures Leverage Ratio

The crypto market fell nearly 7% in 24 hours into June 3, with Bitcoin briefly breaking below $66,000 and around $1.8 billion in positions wiped out.

The drop looked sudden, but the on-chain data had been flashing for days. Leverage sat at October-crash levels, funding ran hot, and a rare Strategy Bitcoin sale was the spark.

The Leverage Was Already at October-Crash Levels

Before the drop, the derivatives market was stretched. Bitcoin’s futures open interest leverage ratio, a gauge of how much borrowed money sits in the futures market relative to Bitcoin’s size, climbed to 2.63% on June 2. The perpetual version reached 2.48%. Both were the highest readings since October 6, 2025.

Futures Leverage Ratio
BTC Futures Leverage Ratio: Glassnode

That date matters. It fell days before the October 10 Black Friday crash, when the same ratio peaked near 2.73%. A high reading means traders had piled into leveraged positions after a steady rally, leaving the market fragile.

Want more token insights like this? Sign up for Editor Harsh Notariya’s Daily Crypto Newsletter here.

Advertisement

Funding rates showed which side. The rate across all exchanges, the periodic fee that long traders pay shorts on perpetual futures, rose to about 0.018 on June 2, the most positive single-day reading since early September.

Funding Rates
Bitcoin Funding Rates: CryptoQuant

Because positive funding means longs pay to hold their bets, the spike confirms the leverage had crowded onto the long side. Notably, the funding bias was already high on June 1, at 0.017, the day when the market got its major bearish catalyst.

A Key BTC Sale Broke the Mood, Led to the Crypto Crash

The spark came on June 1. Strategy, the corporate Bitcoin holder led by Michael Saylor, disclosed a rare Bitcoin sale, its first in years. For a firm known only for buying, the reversal hit sentiment hard.

Analytics firm Santiment reported that social sentiment flipped into extreme fear, with traders blaming the Strategy sale as a main trigger.

With the market already leaning long and over-leveraged, that shock was enough to start the unwind.

BTC Spot Selling Ran Hotter Than October

The selling was not only in derivatives. Spot Bitcoin moving onto exchanges, often a precursor to selling, spiked on June 2. Total exchange inflows reached about 58,617 BTC, the highest since April 14. June 1 hit the sentiment hard and June 2 saw exchange-specific inflows as a result.

Bitcoin Exchange Inflow
Bitcoin Exchange Inflow: CryptoQuant

That figure carries weight against the October comparison. On October 7, 2025, just before the Black Friday crash, inflows peaked near 46,527 BTC. June 2 ran higher, so spot selling pressure was heavier this time than ahead of the October wipeout.

Crowded long leverage and real coins hitting exchanges together set off the crypto crash cascade.

Advertisement

Whales Sold, and It Was a Bitcoin Problem

The selling traced to large holders. Santiment data showed wallets holding between 10 and 10,000 BTC, the whales and sharks, offloaded 24,602 BTC over the past week, an 18% cut. The smallest traders, holding under 0.01 BTC, added just 61 coins, far too little to cushion the fall.

The cause sat with Bitcoin itself. CryptoQuant’s head of research, Julio Moreno, noted that Bitcoin demand was contracting at about 232,000 BTC a month, and argued the correction tied to demand rather than stocks, oil, or macro. US equities, by contrast, sat at record highs.

Because Bitcoin still commands about 58.4% of the total crypto market, its share of all crypto value, per CoinGecko, its slide dragged the rest of the market down with it, resulting in this sudden crypto crash.

Bitcoin Dominance Chart
Bitcoin Dominance Chart: CoinGecko

For now, the data that flagged the drop is the data to watch. Whether leverage resets or builds back up, and whether Bitcoin demand steadies, will shape how the market moves over the next few days.

The post It Was All There: High Leverage and a Rare BTC Sale Behind the June Crypto Crash appeared first on BeInCrypto.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Crypto World

Ripple’s RLUSD in Focus as Mastercard Expands Stablecoin Strategy

Published

on

Global payments giant Mastercard has taken another major step toward integrating blockchain into traditional finance. It announced broader settlement capabilities that now include several stablecoins, such as Ripple’s RLUSD, Circle’s USDC, Paxos-issued PYUSD, USDG, and USDP, and SoFi’s SoFiUSD.

The crypto assets linked to the US dollar will be enabled across a wide range of supported networks, such as XRPL, Solana, Ethereum, Arbitrum, and Base.

To Settle Transactions in Stablecoins

The announcement from the TradFi behemoth reveals that the company is expanding its infrastructure to allow merchants and partners to settle transactions using the aforementioned assets. This is considered a significant evolution from pilot programs into more practical, real-world applications.

The firm has been building out its crypto strategy through its Multi-Token Network (MTN), designed to bridge traditional finance and digital assets. Most recently, it outlined a new collaboration that included some industry giants such as Binance, Ripple, and even PayPal.

Advertisement

Its stablecoin initiatives saw a major push in March when Mastercard announced the acquisition of such a payments firm called BVNK for $1.8 billion.

RLUSD has drawn particular attention due to Ripple’s strong presence in cross-border payments. However, Mastercard’s announcement encompasses a wider range of established stablecoins, including USDC and PYUSD.

Both are already gaining traction in institutional and payments use cases, and Mastercard is attempting to position itself as a neutral infrastructure layer rather than backing a single issuer.

Stablecoins’ Growth

The company’s latest move on the stablecoin scene comes as demand quickly grows for faster and cheaper cross-border transactions. These assets are increasingly viewed as a viable alternative to legacy correspondent-backing systems, offering near-instant settlement and lower costs.

Advertisement

Mastercard’s decision to expand support signals rising confidence in their long-term role within the global financial system. In addition, the firm emphasized its commitment to regulatory compliance, security, and interoperability, which are all key requirements for institutional adoption.

“The next phase of stablecoin adoption is about real-world utility, especially in settlement, where timing and liquidity matter most. By introducing intraday and weekend on settlement options across our global network, we’re expanding how partners manage liquidity and operate in an always-on digital economy while maintaining the trust, resilience and safeguards they expect from Mastercard,” commented Raj Dhamodharan, executive vice president, Blockchain & Digital Assets at Mastercard.

The post Ripple’s RLUSD in Focus as Mastercard Expands Stablecoin Strategy appeared first on CryptoPotato.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Crypto World

Zcash Foundation fixes Orchard bug with Zebra emergency upgrade

Published

on

Zcash privacy tested as Arkham tracks 53% of ZEC

Zcash Foundation released Zebra 4.5.3 and Zebra 5.0.0 after engineers found and fixed a critical soundness bug in the Orchard Action circuit.

Summary

  • Zcash Foundation fixed an Orchard circuit bug before known exploitation and urged urgent Zebra upgrades.
  • Zebra 4.5.3 disabled Orchard actions, while 5.0.0 re-enabled them through NU6.2 at mainnet height 3,364,600.
  • Zcash said no unauthorized value appeared, and Sapling plus transparent transactions kept working normally during incident.

The foundation said Zebra 4.5.3 activated an emergency soft fork at mainnet block height 3,363,426. The release temporarily rejected transactions and blocks containing Orchard actions while engineers prepared a corrected circuit.

The soft fork went live at about 02:00 UTC on June 2 after an earlier coordination attempt faced patch deployment issues. The foundation said private coordination with miners and exchanges started on May 31 to reduce the chance of exploitation before public disclosure.

Advertisement

NU6.2 restores shielded transactions

Zebra 5.0.0 activated the NU6.2 hard fork at mainnet block height 3,364,600. The upgrade re-enabled Orchard actions with a corrected circuit and routed Orchard proofs to a new per-circuit verifying key. The release also marked the second security-driven protocol upgrade in Zcash history since 2016.

A hard fork was needed because a zero-knowledge proof circuit fix requires a new pinned verifying key. 

Advertisement

“We strongly urge all node operators to upgrade to Zebra 5.0.0 as soon as possible,” Zcash Foundation said.

No known exploit found

The bug was discovered on May 29 by independent security researcher Taylor Hornby during a protocol audit for Shielded Labs. ZODL engineers Daira-Emma Hopwood, Kris Nuttycombe and Jack Grigg confirmed the issue within hours and began work on a fix.

The foundation said the flaw could have allowed invalid state changes inside Orchard and possible double spending within that pool. It also said Zcash’s turnstile mechanism protected total ZEC supply, and “There is no evidence of unauthorized value creation.” The affected code included older halo2_gadgets, orchard and zcash_primitives releases, plus zcashd versions 5.0.0 through 6.12.3.

Why Orchard remains important

Orchard is Zcash’s newest shielded pool and a core part of its privacy system. It launched with NU5 in 2022 and uses Halo 2, which removed the need for a trusted setup. That design made Orchard a key part of Zcash’s current privacy roadmap.

Related market coverage has recently focused on rising Zcash shielded use. A recent report said about 30% of ZEC supply had moved into shielded pools, with Orchard holding 4.2 million ZEC and most of the recent growth.

Advertisement

The foundation said user privacy was not harmed during the incident. Sapling and transparent transactions also continued operating normally while Orchard actions remained paused.

Node operators now face the main task of upgrading to Zebra 5.0.0, rather than relying on older releases. Operators that stayed on an incorrect fork after NU6.2 may need to resync from scratch or restore from a backup made before activation.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Crypto World

FCA Warns on Crypto Sponsorship Risks 8 Days Before FIFA World Cup 2026

Published

on

FCA Warns on Crypto Sponsorship Risks 8 Days Before FIFA World Cup 2026

The UK Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) warned Premier League clubs that sponsorship deals with unauthorized crypto firms could expose them to legal liability, money laundering risks, and reputational damage.

The regulator’s warning, which raises concerns about existing partnerships, arrives 8 days before the 2026 World Cup, a window of peak global football attention.

Crypto Sponsorship Money Floods Football Before World Cup

Crypto firms spent a record £130 million ($170 million) on Premier League sponsorships last season, according to Bloomberg. Fourteen of 20 clubs carried crypto or blockchain partners, up from eight a year earlier.

Manchester City led commercial earners, generating €408 million ($474M) in 2025, ahead of its broadcast income. The influx filled gaps left by tighter gambling rules, fueling crypto deals across clubs.

Advertisement

The 2026 World Cup begins June 11 in Mexico City, per FIFA. The tournament magnifies sponsor visibility, raising the stakes for clubs whose partners reach millions of international fans.

FCA Targets Unauthorised Crypto Sponsors

The FCA said some unauthorized firms may breach financial promotion rules by using club branding to reach fans. It has contacted clubs where it identified concerns and signaled enforcement where needed.

“Millions of football fans trust their club’s badge. Clubs should not let unauthorized financial firms exploit that loyalty by putting potentially dodgy products in front of millions of fans,” Reuters reported, citing Lucy Castledine, FCA director of consumer investments.

Follow us on X to get the latest news as it happens

Sports minister Stephanie Peacock said sponsorship income matters, but fans deserve partners that are accountable and safe.

Advertisement

Several deals sit under scrutiny, including the Manchester City sleeve partner. The regulator pointed to UK crypto marketing rules that require authorized promotions for consumers.

Fans Face Total Loss

Fans using unregulated firms risk losing all their money and lack access to compensation schemes, the FCA said.

Unlike authorised providers, these firms fall outside the Financial Ombudsman and compensation cover.

A logo signals payment, not a safety endorsement.

Advertisement

The watchdog already maintains an FCA warning list that firms can check. Broader crypto sports sponsorship growth suggests the tension between revenue and protection will persist.

With FIFA World Cup 2026 kickoff days away, the coming weeks may reveal whether teams trim partnerships or defend the cash they have come to rely on.

Subscribe to our YouTube channel to watch leaders and journalists provide expert insights

The post FCA Warns on Crypto Sponsorship Risks 8 Days Before FIFA World Cup 2026 appeared first on BeInCrypto.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Crypto World

GameStop (GME), Marvell (MRVL), and Intel (INTC) Lead Pre-Market Gainers Today

Published

on

GME Stock Card

Key Highlights

  • GameStop stock jumped approximately 9–12% following announcement of historic Q1 net income, 14% revenue increase, and $2B buyback authorization
  • Marvell Technology climbed more than 16%, continuing Tuesday’s remarkable 33% gain after Nvidia’s Jensen Huang hinted at potential $1 trillion market cap
  • Intel stock advanced 6% as company executives highlighted robust data center CPU orders and rapidly scaling 18A chip manufacturing
  • GitLab declined 6% following workforce reduction announcement impacting 14% of employees and withdrawal from 22 markets
  • S&P 500 futures edged lower amid Middle East missile activity that reignited geopolitical worries and elevated crude prices

GameStop delivered what many consider its most impressive quarterly performance in years, reporting record-breaking Q1 financial results. The retailer achieved 14% revenue expansion, surpassed analyst projections for earnings per share, and maintained a formidable balance sheet with $9.7 billion in cash and equivalent holdings.


GME Stock Card
GameStop Corp., GME

Management announced authorization for a substantial $2 billion stock repurchase initiative extending through July 2029. Pre-market and early session trading witnessed share prices rising between 9% and 12%.

Chairman Ryan Cohen continues capturing market attention through his aggressive pursuit of eBay via a proposed $56 billion acquisition. While eBay’s leadership has turned down the approach, Cohen has signaled readiness for a proxy battle and outlined plans to leverage GameStop’s physical store network to enhance eBay’s e-commerce platform.

Marvell’s AI Momentum Continues Building

Marvell Technology maintained its extraordinary market surge, tacking on another 16% Wednesday after Tuesday’s spectacular 33% leap. The momentum traces back to remarks from Nvidia’s CEO Jensen Huang, who floated the possibility of Marvell becoming the next technology company achieving a $1 trillion valuation.

Market enthusiasm has focused heavily on Marvell’s Teralynx T100 networking processor, engineered specifically for AI-focused data center deployments. Industry observers view the company as a critical provider of AI infrastructure components, particularly customized semiconductor offerings.

Advertisement

Intel similarly posted gains of approximately 6% after CFO David Zinsner highlighted exceptional demand patterns for data center processors. He characterized the company’s 18A chip as experiencing the fastest production ramp-up the company has witnessed in no less than five years, projecting that CPU demand could accelerate dramatically as artificial intelligence workloads proliferate.

Zinsner referenced transformation initiatives spearheaded by CEO Lip-Bu Tan, which include condensing management hierarchy from 12 levels to 6 and trimming total headcount beneath 80,000 personnel.

GitLab and Palo Alto Experience Declines

GitLab shares retreated approximately 6% following disclosure of a corporate reorganization eliminating roughly 14% of its employee base globally. The software development platform additionally announced plans to cease operations in 22 nations, contracting its international footprint by approximately 37%.

GitLab projects pre-tax restructuring expenses between $30 million and $35 million, with the majority concentrated in the second fiscal quarter of 2027.

Advertisement

Palo Alto Networks declined roughly 4% despite delivering impressive quarterly results. The cybersecurity leader exceeded expectations with adjusted earnings of $0.85 per share and posted revenue reaching $3 billion, representing 31% year-over-year growth.

Next-Generation Security Annual Recurring Revenue surged 60% to $8.1 billion. The selloff occurred even as management elevated full-year projections across all major financial categories.

Broader equity markets faced modest headwinds. S&P 500 futures retreated 0.08% as fresh missile attacks in the Middle East heightened anxieties about a faltering U.S.-Iran diplomatic agreement, driving crude oil quotations upward.

Bitcoin registered marginal gains, changing hands around $67,250. Gold futures slipped 0.65%, while the 10-year Treasury yield climbed to 4.483%.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Crypto World

BTC bounces from overnight tumble to $65,000, but remains under pressure

Published

on

BTC slips back near $75,000 as investors turn elsewhere for gains

Bitcoin (BTC) overnight fell all the way back to $65,300, but has since bounced back to the $67,000 area shortly before the open of U.S. stocks.

A check of the charts shows this is the third time bitcoin has dropped to the mid-$60,000 range since its panicky February 6 bottom.

The previous two “re-tests” of that February 6 bottom — February 24 and March 29 — worked out for the bulls, with prices quickly recovering back above $70,000 and eventually to $83,000 by mid-May.

What happens on this third occasion remains to be seen.

Advertisement

U.S. stock index futures are little changed after another round of record highs on Tuesday. The price of oil and bond yields are both modestly higher.

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2025