Connect with us

Tech

Yes, Home Depot And Lowe’s Have Flock Cameras In Their Parking Lots

Published

on





If you’ve noticed security cameras in parking lots at Home Depot or Lowe’s — whether on streetlights or standalone trailers with solar panels on them — it’s because both companies have deals with a company called Flock Safety. Among other things, Flock makes Automated License Plate Readers (ALPR) cameras and gunshot audio sensors. The cameras record every license plate they see, along with additional information about passing vehicles, including any bumper stickers, damage, bike racks, aftermarket wheels, or other identifying features. Flock collates this information into a Vehicle Signature and uses AI to create a searchable database, so it’s possible to look for a vehicle’s activities with details other than just its license plate. So why are Home Depot and Lowe’s paying for Flock cameras, and what are they doing with the data from them?

In an FAQ on its website, Home Depot says, “Like many retailers, we use license plate readers in our parking lots. These cameras are used for the purpose of detecting and preventing theft and protecting the safety of our customers and associates. We do not grant access to our license plate readers to federal law enforcement.” However, an investigation by 404 Media reveals the last portion of that statement is only partially correct. Home Depot may only be sharing data with local law enforcement agencies, but those agencies can pass it on to their federal counterparts. The investigation found that Lowe’s, meanwhile, is sharing it with both local police, and other police departments across state lines.

Advertisement

A boon for law enforcement, a bane for privacy advocates

In March 2025, Flock published a blog post claiming its technology had helped expose a $20 million money laundering operation using Home Depot and Lowe’s gift cards. Scammers convinced people to buy the companies’ gift cards using computer malware and malicious text messages and then used the proceeds to buy expensive materials or merchandise from the retailers for resale. The appeal for retailers is easy to understand: more data on shoplifters or scammers makes it more likely they’ll be apprehended. But it’s the information on regular customers, and what those with access to Flock-powered databases can do with it, that has civil rights experts and private citizens worried.

Dozens of documented cases of police using Flock to stalk current or former romantic interests, and at least one instance of Texas police using Flock to investigate a woman who left the state for an abortion, are just some of the reasons there’s increasing resistance to the technology from civil society, and some Flock cameras have been vandalized.

Flock says more than 5,000 of its customers are law enforcement agencies. While private businesses using Flock aren’t obligated to share their data with local police, many choose to. Records obtained by the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) show that the Johnson County, Texas Sheriff’s Office can access data from more than 170 Lowe’s locations, many of them outside of Texas, and from dozens of Home Depot locations in the state.

Advertisement

Who has access to Flock cameras matters

While Home Depot says it does not coordinate with Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), Customs and Border Protection (CBP), or other federal agencies regarding immigration enforcement operations, 404 Media found that ICE, which has no contract with Flock, had routinely accessed and used Flock-sourced data with the help of local police.

The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) has found that, even when local police departments opt out of sharing data with federal agencies, Flock retains the right to do so. At the same time, the Institute for Justice continues to document how data from Flock cameras has been misused, and has launched an initiative called The Plate Privacy Project to pressure legislators to crack down on its use, improve safeguards, and force Flock and the companies that use its services to be more transparent about how data are handled to ensure they aren’t abused. Whether the mounting pressure is enough to get Home Depot or Lowe’s to change their stance on, and contracts with, Flock remains to be seen.

Advertisement



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Tech

Shark’s very handy BlastBoss can be had for its lowest price yet on Amazon

Published

on

A vacuum cleaner can’t get behind a radiator or blast cobwebs off a kitchen skylight, but Shark’s BlastBoss can, and it’s currently going for £89.10.

That £89.10 price tag marks a steep drop from the usual £129.99, a 31% discount worth £40.89 on this four-star cordless air blaster built to handle exactly the kind of mess a vacuum cleaner can’t manage alone.

Shark BlastBoss on a sandy backgroundShark BlastBoss on a sandy background

Shark BlastBoss hits its lowest price with 31% off

Priced at £89.10 instead of its usual £129.99, the Shark BlastBoss earns its place as a genuinely useful addition to any cleaning routine.

Advertisement

View Deal

That saving looks even better set against the wider picture: over the past four months, the BlastBoss has mostly held steady around £129.99, dipping briefly to £100 in early summer before climbing back up, which makes today’s £89.10 the lowest it has been recorded at.

Advertisement

That kind of price drop is exactly when it’s worth asking whether the BlastBoss holds up in practice, and our tech expert David Ludlow spent several weeks testing it around his own home, rating it four stars and calling it a highly versatile tool that clears dust from tricky spots a vacuum simply can’t reach.

Flipping the switch between indoor and outdoor mode adjusts the maximum airflow on the fly, while the variable-speed trigger lets you dial in anything from a gentle puff for crumbs on a counter to a full blast for packed-in dust.

Advertisement

Switch to Boost and the BlastBoss claims up to 190mph of airflow, more than enough to shift stubborn dust from behind old radiators. Ludlow found exactly that in testing, using the precision nozzle to clear dust and cobwebs a normal vacuum could never reach.

Advertisement

The Whatsapp LogoThe Whatsapp Logo

Get Updates Straight to Your WhatsApp

Join Now

Advertisement

That power draws down a battery good for around 21 minutes on the standard setting, dropping to under 10 minutes on Boost, though a full recharge from the included adaptor takes roughly three hours from empty.

Outdoors, the bundled broom attachment pairs sweeping with airflow to speed through jobs like clearing grass cuttings off decking or blasting cat hair and leaves from garden furniture, all from a tool that weighs just 660g.

Available in five colours and priced at £89.10 instead of its usual £129.99, the Shark BlastBoss earns its place as a genuinely useful addition to any cleaning routine, tackling jobs indoors and out that a standard vacuum cleaner simply cannot handle.

Advertisement

Advertisement

SQUIRREL_PLAYLIST_10148964

Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

Focal, Naim and Barco Bring 171-Inch LED Wall and 7.0.4 Home Theater to CEDIA Expo 2026

Published

on

Following Barco’s acquisition of VerVent Audio Holding, parent company of Focal and Naim, the three brands are bringing their combined expertise to CEDIA Expo 2026 in Denver with a high-end home theater demonstration built around premium projection, loudspeakers, electronics, and custom integration.

The showcase provides an early look at what Barco had in mind when it acquired VerVent: combining its expertise in premium visualization with Focal’s loudspeaker engineering and Naim’s high-end electronics to create a more complete luxury home entertainment platform.

Barco, Focal, and Naim will participate together in one demonstration, while Focal will take the spotlight in a separate second demo. The two systems offer integrators and home theater enthusiasts different examples of how the newly combined companies intend to compete at the upper end of the residential AV market.

A 7.0.4 System With Subwoofers? Yes, There Is an Explanation

The first demonstration brings Barco, Focal, and Naim together in a 7.0.4-channel home theater system built around the Barco Runar LED Wall, Focal Astral 16 AV processor and amplifier, Focal 1000 Series integrated loudspeakers, and Naim CI Series amplification and source components. The Astral 16 supports 16 channels, including 12 amplified channels and four balanced preamp outputs, making it particularly well suited to ambitious custom home theater installations.

Advertisement

At first glance, the 7.0.4 designation suggests that no subwoofers are being used. That is not actually the case, and Focal provided some useful clarification about how the system is configured.

The seven bed-layer channels are reproduced by eight loudspeakers: one left front, two center speakers reproducing the center channel, one right front, one left surround, one right surround, one left rear, and one right rear.

The reason the system is listed as 7.0.4 rather than 7.1.4 is that the passive subwoofers are integrated with the main speaker channels rather than assigned to a dedicated LFE channel. In other words, the system delivers seven full-range channels with low-frequency reinforcement built into the speaker configuration instead of routing bass to a conventional “.1” subwoofer channel.

Four in-ceiling loudspeakers complete the system, providing the overhead channels required for the Dolby Atmos portion of the 7.0.4 configuration.

Advertisement

Focal 1000 Series Goes Inside the Walls

Focal 1000 Series in-wall and in-ceiling speakers and subwoofer

The loudspeakers used throughout the home theater demonstration come from Focal’s 1000 Series, the French manufacturer’s high-end custom-installation lineup. Designed to disappear into walls and ceilings, the 1000 Series provides an alternative to conventional freestanding loudspeakers without abandoning the performance expectations of a serious music or home theater system.

And Focal is not exactly being shy with the speaker count.

  • 8 x Focal 1000 IWLCR Utopia ($8,499 each) — Three-way in-wall loudspeaker
  • 10 x Focal 1000 IWSUB Utopia ($3,299 each) — Passive sealed in-wall subwoofer
  • 4 x Focal 1000 ICLCR5 ($2,699 each) — Two-way in-ceiling loudspeaker

The 1000 IWLCR Utopia is the flagship in-wall model in the series and incorporates seven drivers, including four woofers, two midrange drivers, and a Beryllium tweeter. It can be installed vertically or horizontally and used for left, center, or right-channel duties.

Advertisement. Scroll to continue reading.

The 1000 IWSUB Utopia uses three 6.5-inch W-cone woofers in a passive sealed enclosure. Multiple units can be combined with the 1000 IWLCR Utopia, which explains how this particular CEDIA system can employ 10 subwoofers without using a dedicated LFE channel.

Four 1000 ICLCR5 in-ceiling loudspeakers handle the overhead channels. Their adjustable design allows the drivers to be aimed toward the listening position, making them particularly suitable for Dolby Atmos installations.

Advertisement

Barco Runar Brings 171 Inches of MicroLED to the Party

For the visual half of this home theater demonstration, Barco is bringing out the Runar LED Wall, a 171-inch direct-view display designed specifically for luxury residential cinema installations.

barco-runar-led-wall-lifestyle

Runar uses Micro LED in Package (MIP) technology with a 0.9 mm pixel pitch and offers a native DCI 4K resolution of 4,096 x 2,160 pixels across a 3.84-meter-wide image. Unlike a conventional projection system, there is no projector, screen, or light path involved; the enormous LED wall is the display.

Barco claims a contrast ratio of up to 200,000:1, an ultra-low black level of 0.005 cd/m², and full DCI-P3 color gamut coverage. The Runar is also engineered to handle both cinema and consumer HDR formats, with DCI-grade HDR at 300 nits and consumer HDR content at up to 1,000 nits.

That combination is especially interesting in a dedicated home theater because it attempts to deliver some of the attributes associated with professional cinema presentation while also producing the considerably higher brightness expected from premium consumer HDR displays. Barco also offers a larger 205-inch Cinemascope version with 5,120 x 2,160 resolution for those who find a 171-inch screen somehow insufficient.

Advertisement

And the price?

Barco does not publish one. The Runar is sold through authorized dealers and custom installers on a quotation basis. If you have to ask, you probably can’t afford it. And if your installer casually suggests the 205-inch version instead, you might want to check whether the kids still need that college fund. Or if your attorney handles divorce cases.

Barco Runar LED Wall Specifications:

Barco Model Runar
Product Type  LED Wall
Price Consult Dealer/Installer
Resolution  Native DCI 4K (4,096 x 2,160 pixels)
Pixel Pitch 0.9 mm
Screen Size 171” diagonal (3.84 m wide)
Display Technology Micro LED in Package (MIP)
HDR Support DCI-grade HDR at 300 nits, consumer-grade HDR at 1,000 nits
Black Level 0.005 cd/m²
DCI-P3 Coverage Full
Inputs HDMI 2.1 (up to 4K 120p 444 10bit) – 2D up to 4K 120fps (DCI SDR/HDR)  – 3D up to 4K 24/48/60fps per eye  – (DCI SDR/HDR) Bitrate 1,250 Mbps 
Dimensions (WHD)  3840 x 2025 x 75.5 mm 
12.6’ x 6.6’ x 0.25’ 
Weight  235 kg / 518 lbs 

For complete specifications and additional technical information, refer to the official Barco Runar product page.

Focal Astral 16 Takes Control of the Home Theater

Focal Astral 16 ($23,999) is a high-end 16-channel AV processor and amplifier designed for custom home theater and multi-room installations. Developed in partnership with StormAudio (Immersive Audio Technologies), the Astral 16 combines Focal branding and system integration with StormAudio’s multichannel processing platform.

Advertisement
focal-astral-16-lifestyle-angle

The Astral 16 incorporates Pascal Audio Class D amplification and supports 16 audio channels. Twelve channels are internally amplified, while four additional channels are provided through balanced XLR preamp outputs for connection to external amplification.

It also supports Dolby Atmos, DTS, and Auro-3D, along with filtering, equalization, and bass-management tools for configuring more complex theater systems. Dirac Live room calibration is included to help compensate for speaker placement and room acoustics, while compatibility with Control4, Crestron, ELAN, Savant, and RTI makes the Astral 16 particularly well suited to professionally installed systems.

Advertisement. Scroll to continue reading.

Astral Specifications

Focal Model  Astral 16
Product Type  16-Channel AV Processor/Amplifier
Price $23,999
Number of Amplified Channels  12
Power Output (for each of 12 channels) 200W (8ohms) / 300W (4ohms)
Number of Unamplified Channels 4 (XLR outputs for external amps)
Number of Decoded/Processed Channels 16
Surround Sound Format Support Dolby Atmos / DTS:X / Auro-3D 
Room Calibration  Dirac Live – (mic and tripod included) – also includes license
HDMI Inputs (ver 2.0) 7
HDMI Ouputs 3 (one with HDMI-eARC)
HDR Support HDR10, HLG
Setup Management  Configurable multi-theater management 
Configurable audio zones management 
Unlimited Theater and audio zones listening presets 
Backup and restore of setup 
Firmware update via USB/network 
Custom Control Options Crestron, Control4, Savant, RTI home automation 
Front Panel Display TFT LCD 4.3″ 
Dimensions with stands (hwd)) 19.10 x 47.90 x 49 cm
7.52 x 18.86 x 19.29 Inches
Net weight – with stands (kg/lbs)  20.0 / 44.1 

Naim CI Series Adds Power and Streaming

Providing additional amplification and streaming support, Naim is contributing two products from its CI Series to the CEDIA demonstration.

Advertisement
Naim Audio CI Series 2024
Naim Audio CI Series

The Naim CI Series was developed specifically for the custom installation market and to complement Focal’s integrated loudspeakers. The range combines compact rack-friendly designs with high-output amplification, system configuration tools, and integration with professionally installed audio systems.

4 x Naim CI-NAP 101 ($1,999 each) — The CI-NAP 101 is a rack-mountable mono power amplifier capable of operating with conventional low-impedance loudspeakers or 70V/100V distributed audio systems. It delivers up to 500 watts into 8 ohms and 800 watts into 4 ohms, with outputs of 150 watts on a 70V line and 240 watts on a 100V line.

That flexibility is particularly relevant to this installation. Naim specifically identifies the CI-NAP 101 as suitable for driving Focal’s 1000 IWLCR Utopia together with two 1000 IWSUB Utopia passive subwoofers, which closely mirrors the configuration being demonstrated at CEDIA.

The CI-Uniti 102, discussed below, can work alongside the CI-NAP 101 as a streaming source, amplifier, and system-control component, but it does not provide 70V/100V amplification itself.

Advertisement

1 x Naim CI-Uniti 102 ($1,499) — The CI-Uniti 102 is a compact streaming amplifier designed for custom installations, delivering 150 watts into 8 ohms while adding network streaming, DSP, HDMI, Dante, and flexible system control.

As we found in our recent Naim CI-Uniti 102 review, its strengths are speed, clarity, system integration, and the ability to drive a wide range of loudspeakers without taking up much rack space. In this CEDIA system, it provides streaming access and works alongside the CI-NAP 101 amplifiers to support the larger Focal installation.

Additional Components Used in the Home Theater Demo

Kaleidescape Movie Player (model not specified) — Provides downloaded 4K HDR movies at very high bitrates, with picture and sound quality that can rival or, depending on the title, exceed Ultra HD Blu-ray.

Apple TV 4K — Provides access to additional video and music streaming services, giving the system a more conventional streaming source alongside Kaleidescape.

Advertisement

Focal Diva Alta Utopia Brings Four-Way Active Wireless Audio to CEDIA 2026

focal-diva-alta-utopia-front-views-900

Focal will also showcase $210,000 Diva Alta Utopia, the company’s flagship active wireless speakers, which combine Utopia-derived acoustic engineering with integrated Naim streaming, amplification, DAC, and DSP technology.

This is not simply a larger and more expensive version of the Diva Utopia formula. The Diva Alta Utopia pushes Focal and Naim’s active wireless concept into true ultra-high-end territory with a four-way architecture, new PRISM tweeter, M-profile “W” midrange driver, Ultra Wideband inter-speaker connectivity, extensive streaming support, and 600 watts of Naim-developed Class A/B amplification inside each loudspeaker.

And then there is the $210,000-per-pair price, which makes the word “wireless” feel rather less casual than usual.

Advertisement. Scroll to continue reading.

The Bottom Line 

The real significance of this CEDIA 2026 showcase is not the individual hardware, but the fact that Barco now owns Focal and Naim and can present video, loudspeakers, amplification, streaming, and custom integration as one luxury AV ecosystem.

Advertisement

The first demo shows that strategy at full scale with a 171-inch Runar LED Wall, Focal 1000 Series architectural speakers and subwoofers, and Naim CI electronics. The second takes the same Focal and Naim partnership in a different direction with the $210,000 Diva Alta Utopia active wireless system.

For luxury integrators and clients who want high performance with minimal visible hardware, that combination is the real differentiator. The products are expensive, but the larger story is how much of the system can now come from three brands under the same corporate umbrella.

Price & Availability

All products available through Authorized Barco, Focal, or Naim Dealers:

  • Barco Runar LED Wall – Consult with Dealer/Installer
  • Focal 1000 IWLCR Utopia – $8,499 
  • Focal 1000 IWSUB Utopia – $3,299 
  • Focal 1000 ICLCR5 – $2,699 
  • Focal Astral 16 – $23,999 
  • Naim CI NAP-101 –  $1,999 
  • Naim CI Uniti-102  – $1,499 
  • Diva Alta Utopia (2 speaker set) – $210,000

The Barco. Focal, Naim demos will be in Booth 3123 in the Colorado Convention Center, Denver, Colorado from Sept 2-4, 2026.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

Sophia Tung Built a Rideable Tune Thumper Radio Bike From Mario Kart World

Published

on

Sohpia Tung Real-Life Tune Thumper Radio Bike Mario Kart World
Photo credit: inb4ohnoes
Sophia Tung spent a year turning Nintendo’s orange boombox-on-wheels into a street-legal machine she could actually ride. The YouTuber and engineer, already known for deep dives into robotaxis and emerging tech, became so hooked on Mario Kart World that she decided the Tune Thumper had to exist in real life at full size. Everything on it works: speakers play music, buttons click and pause tracks, headlights and taillights fire up, the antenna stands tall, and a Nintendo Switch 2 dock sits inside the cassette-door section so you can play the game on the very bike it came from.



Game screenshots and photogrammetry provided her with a starting point for creating a 3D reference, but when she attempted to scale the in-game model 1:1, it proved to be far too long and high for someone to sit comfortably and ride securely.Instead, she installed the body on an old FTO frame, which proved to be an excellent choice, and flipped the front fork to reduce the wheelbase from 84 cm to 77 cm, making it more manageable.


Nintendo Switch 2 System
  • The next evolution of Nintendo Switch
  • One system, three play modes: TV, Tabletop, and Handheld
  • Larger, vivid, 7.9” LCD touch screen with support for HDR and up to 120 fps

Sophia Tung Real-Life Tune Thumper Radio Bike Mario Kart World
That way, she could preserve the cartoon-like proportions while also making it safe for people to sit and steer. A friend suggested going with wood after they received a price for a $10,000 3D print, which is a lot of money for a print that takes ages to complete. So cabinet builder Joe DiMaio spent weeks working with her to build the speaker shell out of MDF sheets, stacking and cutting them into the curved shape before hand-applying all the features such as the black grilles, colored buttons, volume knob, and cassette embellishments. She had her partner handle the most of the late nites and frustrations that followed.

Sophia Tung Real-Life Tune Thumper Radio Bike Mario Kart World
An 84-volt battery pack provides power to the motors via a unique speed controller, with a top speed of approximately 65 mph on 13-inch wheels. A MOSFET switch and DC converters handle the illumination, so the head and tail lights appear to belong on a real vehicle, which they now do. The speakers are positioned where the game’s black speaker cones would be, and they are actually playing audio, which is a really great touch. And you can see the cassette door, which hides the Switch 2 dock internals as well as some extra ports, not to mention Apple CarPlay. The whole weight came to roughly 70 pounds.

Sophia Tung Real-Life Tune Thumper Radio Bike Mario Kart World
Halloween night proved to be the first real-world test, and let me tell you… the dashboard reset on every bump, a printed tail piece flew off, and one of the tires ran flat, but folks on the street just stopped and stared when they saw it, which provided plenty of Instagram worthy moments. After that ride, she was able to replace a shorted controller by hand, secure the electronics against vibration, and eventually resolve the dock integration issue.

Sophia Tung Real-Life Tune Thumper Radio Bike Mario Kart World
Later, she took the bike to a Nintendo store and demonstrated that the buttons functioned, the music played, and the dock could power up a screen. The entire endeavor took her a year of evenings, splinters, and 4 a.m. sessions, but the end product is a wooden radio bike that appears to have stepped straight out of the game and onto the pavement.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Tech

How Many Wind Turbines Would It Take To Replace A Micro Nuclear Reactor?

Published

on





As we slowly drop our reliance on fossil fuels, there is still discussion about how to plug the gaps in our energy needs. Of course, renewable sources like wind power are helping take the strain, and modern turbines are far more capable than early designs were. However, renewable schemes like this are not yet ready to take up all of the energy shortfall, especially in places where the wind doesn’t blow consistently or where large-scale installations simply aren’t practical. 

This is why nuclear power is still regularly touted as the energy source the planet needs to help make the transition away from fossil fuels. While there is always controversy and debate surrounding nuclear power, it does pack a “power punch.” It would take around 800 wind turbines to replace a typical nuclear reactor. All these turbines would have a footprint of about 1,000 times that of a nuclear reactor — it just isn’t a practical option. However, there is a comparison where the playing field might be slightly fairer: nuclear microreactors. 

Microreactors, as the name suggests, are small reactors useful for supplying power to isolated communities, military installations, research stations, and anywhere else where there is limited or no grid access. In many of these situations, and assuming the right conditions, wind turbines can also be used as a power source. 

Advertisement

However, to really understand how wind turbines stack up against microreactors, we first need to understand a few things.

Advertisement

What are microreactors?

There is nothing new about the relationship between nuclear power and portability. U.S. Navy submarines, for instance, have used portable nuclear reactors since the USS Nautilus was commissioned as the first nuclear-powered submarine in 1954. The latest generation of naval reactors powers ships like the USS Gerald R. Ford, one of the largest aircraft carriers in the world.  

However, regardless of size, all nuclear reactors unlock the energy contained within matter by splitting uranium or plutonium atoms and use the heat energy released to power turbines that generate electricity. The vast majority of nuclear reactors are a type known as pressurized water reactors (PWRs), and a typical commercial one produces around 1 gigawatt of power. 

When it comes to nuclear microreactors, the underlying physics are identical, but there are some fundamental differences. These include how the reactors are cooled, with various reactor types under development. However, for the purposes of this article, the most obvious difference is size. While there is no clear definition that classifies microreactors, the U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) classifies microreactors as producing between 1 and 20 megawatts of power. While there are arguments stating that 50-megawatt reactors also fall into this category, let’s give the wind turbines a fair crack at the whip and base our comparison figure on the EIA definition. To be completely fair, we’ll set the bar about midway and run our comparison against a 10-megawatt microreactor. 

Advertisement

Wind turbines vs. nuclear microreactors

Now that we’ve set the baseline for a microreactor, we need to do the same for a wind turbine. However, this is where we also need to look at one of the biggest drawbacks of wind turbines — they need wind to work, and the weather doesn’t always play ball. The measured output of a wind turbine is its maximum possible output in ideal situations. Our comparison will need to account for this. So, let’s split the difference again and assume that the wind turbines are situated somewhere there is enough wind that they consistently hit half their maximum output.

Which leads us to the next point. Just how much power can a wind turbine generate? Size matters here too — the larger the turbine, the more power it produces. To give wind turbines the best chance, let’s assume that we’re going big with this. A large onshore wind turbine can have a rotor diameter of about 438 feet and can produce up to 3.5 megawatts of power, optimally. Or, about 1.75 megawatts for our wind-adjusted comparison. In this scenario, and when compared to a 10-megawatt microreactor, we’d need about six wind turbines to replace it.

On the face of it, this seems like a realistic option. Certainly when compared to replacing a commercial reactor with wind turbines, the numbers are certainly kinder. However, we need to temper this slightly — a microreactor will provide consistent power regardless of weather conditions and can do so for years at a time without refueling. 

Advertisement



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Tech

Xbox respawns IKEA furniture with gaming range

Published

on

OFFBEAT

At last, somewhere comfy to sit while your PlayStation 5 game loads

Microsoft’s latest Xbox merchandising deal means at least you can sit on an IKEA cushion while you wait for your PlayStation 5 to boot.

Advertisement

IKEA has announced YXSTABY, a nine-piece collection of items aimed at the XBOX completist who has to have every possible piece of merchandise associated with their beloved game console. Need a stool? How about one modeled on a controller’s thumbstick? A cushion? There’s a D-pad to throw on the sofa.

And a tariff refund for Xbox customers? Ah, well, the IKEA deal only goes so far…

IKEA has long had a reputation for being that place where relationships go to die, thanks in part to the occasionally labyrinthine layout of its store. Xbox has, under the leadership of Asha Sharma, acquired a similar rep as far as staffers and game studios are concerned. Thousands of workers were laid off in recent months as Sharma “reset the business” to improve the platform’s standing in a market dominated by rivals.

In the UK, IKEA charges £12 for a cushion or platter, and up to £115 for a side table on wheels. The Reg suspects Xbox branded stuff will be a little pricier but considerably less than an Xbox itself. 

Advertisement

Microsoft Store shows the comparatively weedy Xbox Series S retailing for £429.99, while the beefier Series X goes for £669.99. When launched in 2020, the Series S cost £249. “Unfortunately,” wrote Microsoft, “console storage and memory prices have increased by more than 2.5x and we expect another doubling by the fall of 2027.”

It is far from alone. Price rises have become a way of life in the tech industry in recent months as demand for memory outstripped supply.

Colorful room with sculptural figures, green chairs and a central green stool.

A green pedestal stool, lounge chair and other furnishings from IKEA’s new Xbox-themed YXSTABY collection.

This is not the first gaming-related wares that IKEA has sold. The BRÄNNBOLL collection predates the Xbox collaboration and features “everything to improve your gaming adventures, from a rug that helps you hit the enemies, not the table, to gaming bolsters that boost your comfort and play.”

The YXSTABY range was unveiled at Gamescom this month, but eager buyers have a little longer to wait for that Xbox-inspired stool. The range will be in stores and available online from October 1. ®

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

What’s The Difference Between These Samsung Watches?

Published

on





Anyone weighing up Samsung’s 2026 smartwatch options — Galaxy Watch Ultra 2 and Galaxy Watch 9 — would have to pick one over the other mostly based on price, since the former costs nearly twice as much as the latter. But if money’s not a problem, then the question shifts to whether the Ultra 2 is worth the extra cash. While there are some key differences, both share more or less the same foundation, like being powered by Qualcomm’s Snapdragon Wear Elite processor. They also use the same BioActive sensor package, allowing health tracking to work identically on either watch.

As for differences, the first thing you’d notice is also what would make or break your decision. The Galaxy Watch Ultra 2 — the predecessor to the Galaxy Watch Ultra — comes in just one size, 47mm, landing on your wrist at 61.5 grams. Meanwhile, the 40mm Galaxy Watch 9 weighs roughly half of that, coming in at 31.5 grams. Even the larger 44mm version tips the scales at just 34 grams. You’d certainly feel the difference on your wrist, and even more so if it’s skinny. This can be a real drawback considering wearing something around the clock is exactly how these watches collect health data.

Advertisement

However, with that additional weight, you get fancier materials. While both watches have the same sapphire crystal over the screen, the Ultra 2 uses a grade 4 titanium frame and a ceramic-and-sapphire back. The Watch 9 sticks with aluminum and some plastic. Water resistance on a Galaxy Watch gets measured in atmospheres, and Samsung rates the Watch 9 at 5ATM, while the Ultra 2 doubles that to 10ATM.

Advertisement

Beyond the immediate differences

Additionally, the Ultra 2 has a third button that the Watch 9 lacks. It’s this orange Quick Button you can map to whatever you want. Holding it down for five seconds triggers a safety feature, too – an 86-decibel siren, which Samsung says carries up to 180 meters.

However, perhaps the biggest selling point of the Ultra 2 is the battery. The company quotes up to 60 hours with the always-on display running. That said, one of the tips to maximize battery life on a Galaxy Watch is to switch off the AOD. GSMArena and Wareable did that and were able to push the battery to over four days. Strangely, however, the reviews found the Galaxy Watch 9 delivering less than promised. Samsung claims up to 30 hours with AOD on, but several outlets, including GSMArena and PCMag, achieved far less than that, sometimes not even getting a full day out of it.

The other differentiating factor is display brightness. The Ultra 2 supposedly peaks at 5,000 nits against 3,000 for the Watch 9. That said, Samsung, in a footnote, quietly explains that’s for a localized peak under bright light. The Ultra 2 also doubles storage to 64GB against the Watch 9’s 32GB.

Other useful features present on the Ultra 2 but not on the Watch 9 include Trail Run, which reads live elevation, how deep into a climb you are, and your total ascent. That 10ATM rating also comes in handy underwater, since the Ultra 2 is likewise capable of logging depth and water temperature.

Advertisement



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Tech

Scientists built a battery that charges almost instantly, but there’s a catch

Published

on

TL;DR: Scientists have built a quantum battery prototype that can produce an electrical current after charging in femtoseconds, marking a step forward for a technology that has largely remained theoretical and limited to small-scale lab experiments. The prototype is far from replacing conventional batteries, but it provides evidence that quantum effects could eventually enable faster energy transfer in quantum hardware and other specialized systems.

The device, developed by a team led by CSIRO quantum science researcher James Quach, is designed to take advantage of a quantum effect called superabsorption. In simple terms, the more molecules involved, the faster the system can absorb energy.

That is the opposite of what happens with conventional batteries, which generally take longer to charge as they get larger. The work does not mean quantum batteries are ready to replace those used in phones, laptops, or electric vehicles. The prototype stores only a small amount of energy and holds it for nanoseconds. Still, researchers say the experiment demonstrates that energy can be rapidly absorbed and extracted from a quantum battery.

The prototype uses an optical microcavity made of two mirrors separated by about 100 nanometers. The space between the mirrors is filled with organic dye molecules. A laser shines into the cavity, causing the light and molecules to interact strongly.

Advertisement

That interaction creates hybrid light-matter states. The molecules do not absorb energy independently, as they would in a classical system. Instead, they respond collectively.

The battery charges in femtoseconds, or quadrillionths of a second. It can retain energy for nanoseconds, about six orders of magnitude longer than the charging period.

Quach’s team first demonstrated superabsorption in 2022. The newer experiment added the ability to extract an electrical current. The current remains small, but demonstrating it is an important step toward making a quantum battery useful beyond a physics experiment.

Quantum batteries are not expected to compete with conventional batteries simply by storing more energy. Their main attraction is the possibility of very fast charging and precise energy delivery.

Advertisement

Dario Ferraro, an associate professor of physics at the University of Genova, told the BBC that quantum batteries are intended to improve the speed and control of energy delivery rather than significantly increase the amount of energy a battery can store.

For now, the gap between the prototype and a useful power source remains wide. The device can hold only a few billion electron volts of energy and retains it for a very short time. A real-world system would need far greater capacity and much longer storage times.

Quach said his group has built a hybrid design intended to address those limitations. It combines quantum components for rapid charging with classical layers that can store energy for longer. He said the team is preparing a paper on the work.

Advertisement

The researchers also plan to link multiple microscopic batteries together. “If we do those two things, then we’re on our way to being able to power a conventional device,” Quach said.

The optical microcavity system has one practical advantage: It operates at room temperature. Other quantum-battery designs use superconducting materials, which are already important in quantum computing but require extremely cold operating conditions.

Superconducting systems can operate at temperatures below -150°C. “This is fine for quantum computers, but not so useful to power your mobile phone,” Quach said.

Advertisement

Mauro Paternostro, a quantum physicist at Queen’s University Belfast, said the optical approach is a strong way to demonstrate that quantum charging can work. However, he added that it may be difficult to draw energy from such a system in a controlled and useful way. “A microcavity gives you a beautiful ensemble demonstration, but poor control over getting the energy back out in a useful, directed form,” he said.

The first practical use of quantum batteries, if they reach that point, may be in quantum hardware rather than consumer electronics. Quantum computers already rely on specialized equipment, and some use superconducting systems that operate at cryogenic temperatures.

Quach said a quantum battery could eventually help reduce energy use in quantum devices and support faster, more reliable operation. However, those benefits have not yet been demonstrated.

Ferraro said quantum effects are fragile and can break down when the system interacts with its environment. He expects quantum batteries to remain most useful in quantum-scale applications. “In my view… quantum batteries are unlikely to replace conventional batteries in everyday applications such as mobile phones or electric vehicles,” Ferraro said. “Their natural domain is the quantum scale.”

Advertisement

The latest prototype does not settle that debate. It does show that researchers can use quantum effects to charge a system quickly and extract an electrical current. The next challenge is building a device that can store more energy, hold it longer, and release it where it is needed.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Tech

UK networks are not ready for AI traffic, say mobile operators

Published

on

VodafoneThree’s networks director says UK mobile quality is not ready for AI traffic and that planning rules, not money, are the obstacle, with more than half of its upgrades to existing masts requiring permission. The EU’s Gigabit Infrastructure Act has since November given authorities four months to decide a permit, after which it is deemed granted.

The UK’s largest mobile operator says its own network is not good enough. “I am embarrassed today at the level of quality of our network,” Andrea Donà of VodafoneThree told the Guardian.

He was describing what happens when AI traffic arrives. His comparison was the signal loss people get at a stadium, made permanent.

The starting position is poor. UK mobile coverage is worse than every EU member state and every other G7 country, on Opensignal data compiled for Which?. The same analysis puts it 57th globally for network performance.

Advertisement

Money is not the obstacle. VodafoneThree has committed £11B to upgrading masts, and it is cutting its mast count by 30%.

Almost none of the work needs a new site. About 96% of the upgrades are on existing structures, and more than half of those still require planning permission.

Donà’s ask is procedural rather than financial. “Planning reform is the lowest possible cost growth policy, it doesn’t require any government money,” he said.

The European Union legislated exactly that in 2024. The remedy he is describing is already on the statute book across the Channel.

Advertisement

Under the Gigabit Infrastructure Act, national authorities have four months to decide a permit application for a very high capacity network, and the permit is deemed granted if they miss the deadline.

It has applied since November last year. Member states may opt out of the automatic approval, but they have to offer compensation or a right to sue instead.

Brussels is going further. The Digital Networks Act proposes indefinite spectrum licences, use it or share it rules, and simpler deployment in exchange for tougher coverage duties.

The UK is bound by none of it. Its operators also point out that mobile networks are critical national infrastructure without the reliefs data centres receive on business rates and energy.

Advertisement

Elsewhere the gap is being attacked from a different direction. A Spanish startup raised €150M to beam 5G to ordinary phones from orbit, which needs no local consent at all.

Which is the shape of the problem. Britain protects the building where the model runs and not the network that has to reach it.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Tech

Startup bags $7M to build drone-interceptor-in-a-backpack systems

Published

on

offbeat

Spike drone defense system is designed to be carried in a rucksack or mounted on top of a vehicle

A defense startup has raised $7 million to develop its counter-drone system that uses small interceptors to defend against swarms of FPV (First-Person View) drone swarms, the kind causing heavy battlefield casualties in Ukraine.

Advertisement

San Francisco-based Mara says it has secured the funding to bring its Spike drone defense system to market, aiming to provide a cost-effective counter to small FPV attack drones – typically quad-copters with an explosive payload.

The system comprises separate Spotter sensor / targeting units and multiple Seeker kinetic interceptors. The latter are small (250g / half a pound), fast (200 kmph / 124 mph), tube-launched, and have onboard intelligence to help find their way to the target.

Mara claims that deployments can scale from a single rucksack kit to protect a squad of troops, to a vehicle-mounted launcher, up to a multi-kilometer perimeter shield for a base or site.

A launcher can be fitted with up to 48 of the Seeker interceptors, and reloaded in less than a minute, or so the firm says.

Advertisement

The Spotter detection and tracking sensor combines electro-optical and acoustic sensors with an optional low-signature radar, for day and night all-weather protection.

“Small drones changed the battlefield because they distributed the cost and capability of precise attack,” Mara co-founder and CEO Daniel Kofman said in a statement.

Yet many defensive countermeasures are concentrated into one costly point solution, he claims. “Spike creates a distributed mesh of small, cheap nodes that can each aim and shoot in multiple directions at once.”

The components of its Spike system have already been tested by potential customers, Mara says. Seeker completed intercepts cued through US Army systems at an exercise in Texas, while Spotter has been operated on an armored vehicle during another Army exercise in Europe.

Advertisement
two images of a Seeker drone, one with rotors unfurled, the other with them folded

Seeker drone and with rotors folded

Most recently, Ukrainian forces operated Spotter near to the front line in their country, where it tracked multiple FPV drones.

Mara says it has research and testing agreements with three US defense organizations, and is in early-stage engagements with international military partners in the UK, Czech Republic and Ukraine.

The $7 million funding round was led by Khosla Ventures.

We asked Mara for further details, such as the range of its Seeker interceptors and just how inexpensive they are, and will update if we get answers. ®

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

South Korea is giving its entire population free access to AI, no token limits

Published

on

The big picture: South Korea is preparing to offer free generative AI services to its entire population, using the technology to help people handle everyday tasks such as booking medical appointments, finding housing, and sorting out taxes. The program is intended to expand access to homegrown AI systems while giving the government a larger role in how they are used for everyday services.

The government’s “AI for All” program will begin beta testing in September, followed by a broader launch later this year. On Friday, Seoul named three technology consortia to provide the services. They include groups led by the country’s two largest telecom companies and the operator of Kakao, one of South Korea’s most widely used consumer platforms.

The services are expected to connect to government systems rather than function solely as standalone chatbots. Residents will be able to use them to book doctor appointments, search for apartments, and get tax guidance. Small businesses will be able to calculate taxes and check whether they qualify for government support. Parents will receive recommendations for educational content.

Each consortium plans to introduce its own AI app and add generative AI features to existing products. Users will have unlimited access, with no token limits under the government-supported plans.

Advertisement

Seoul will supply some of the computing capacity needed to run the services. The government plans to distribute up to 512 Nvidia B200 chips among the three consortia and help cover operating costs. The Ministry of Science and ICT has not disclosed the program’s total cost.

The initiative is part of South Korea’s effort to build a stronger domestic AI industry and reduce its reliance on systems developed in the US and China. The government is trying to steer more consumers toward locally developed AI products by making premium-level services widely available at no cost.

South Korea already has a large market for generative AI. A government survey earlier this year found that about one-quarter of South Koreans pay for AI services. By comparison, a PNC Bank survey found that about 2% of Americans pay for such services. Seoul estimates that more than 20 million people in South Korea use free generative AI tools.

The rollout is backed by a broader increase in AI spending. President Lee Jae Myung’s administration has set aside about 10 trillion won, or $7.2 billion, for AI-related spending in 2026. That is three times the amount allocated the previous year.

Advertisement

For South Korea, the project will test whether generative AI can become part of the country’s basic digital infrastructure. Its success will depend on whether the systems are reliable enough for people to use them for practical, routine tasks.

The government has not set an adoption target for the new service.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2025