The plan was to demolish an existing dwelling to facilitate the extension of retail floor space, bigger carpark, new pedestrian access and cycle parking
An application for the demolition of a house to facilitate the expansion of a Spar garage in the exclusive Cherry Valley area of East Belfast has been refused after a local campaign against it.
Against the recommendation of council officials, elected representatives at Belfast City Council narrowly voted to refuse a planning application around the garage at 46-50 Gilnahirk Road.
The plan, by Maxol Oil Ltd, was to demolish an existing dwelling, 50 Gilnahirk Road, to facilitate a proposed extension and alterations to the existing petrol filling station. This was to include the extension of retail floor space, the extension and the realignment of the carpark, to provide nine additional car parking spaces and new pedestrian access, and cycle parking.
READ MORE: Second Belfast cafe prosecuted in a month for allowing hookah shisha smoking
READ MORE: Tour groups clash over rights to Belfast’s oldest graveyard
The site lies within a mixed-use area comprising commercial and residential uses. The area is characterised by a mix of semi-detached and detached dwellings and a row of shops and commercial premises. Number 50 is an unoccupied bungalow.
The May meeting of the council’s Planning Committee at City Hall saw the application go to a vote, with eight councillors in favour of the Maxol plan, all from Sinn Féin, and 11 councillors against, from the DUP, Alliance, the Green Party, and the UUP. A DUP proposal to refuse the application, on terms of retention of residential stocks, and impact on existing residential amenity, was passed.
The decision was against the recommendation of council planning officials, who advised the application should be approved. There were no objections from any of the statutory partners.
The council received 24 representations objecting to the plan, and a petition with 38 signatures, a number of whom also made representations. The objectors were nearby residents, who raised concerns about noise from the resultant development, the increase in traffic and lack of parking, proposed lighting including neon signage, loss of privacy and “erosion of local character of the area.” They also voiced concerns about the demolition of a residential home, which they believed was effectively lowering the housing stock for retail.
Objectors raised concerns about the impact on air quality from more delivery lorries and traffic, and said it would bring too much competition for existing retail in the area. Objectors said the development would lower house prices in the area.
The planning report forwarded to councillors stated: “The applicant has advised that the existing retail store was built approximately 17 years ago and requires modernisation to bring it in line with modern standards, providing greater circulation space in store.” Maxol stated the plan would create seven extra jobs at the site.
The officer planning report states: “The proposal involves the demolition of the existing dwelling at number 50 to facilitate the development. The existing building is not listed, nor within a Conservation Area or Area of Townscape Character and therefore not afforded protection.
“Whilst the proposal will result in the loss of a dwelling, it is considered to comply with policy in that its redevelopment is considered complementary to surrounding residential uses and will not result in any adverse effects on existing residential amenity.”
Alliance Councillor Christine Bower said at the Planning Committee: “While demolition may not need express consent, the loss of housing is a material consideration. This is not a derelict or unusable home, it is being removed primarily because of commercial convenience, not for regeneration or wider public benefit.
“In the context of ongoing housing pressure, and in the objective of maintaining balanced, sustainable neighbourhoods, elected members can conclude that insignificant weight has been given to the loss of a residential dwelling, in a mixed use area.”
She added: “There are clear concerns around residential amenity. The intensification of commercial activity immediately beside homes will increase vehicle movements, forecourt noise and general activity levels
“Traffic and pedestrian safety must be considered. This is a really busy road, serving two schools and a nursery, with DfI confirming to me that it serves around 5,000 road users a day. The area around the garage has no pedestrian crossing and there are no plans from DfI Roads to put any in.”
For all the latest news, visit the Belfast Live homepage here and sign up to our daily newsletter here.

You must be logged in to post a comment Login