Morgan Stanley Investment Management has launched exchange-traded products tracking Ethereum and Solana, expanding the Wall Street bank’s digital asset lineup beyond Bitcoin.

Morgan Stanley launches MSSE and MSOL

Morgan Stanley Investment Management announced the launch of the Morgan Stanley Ethereum Trust and Morgan Stanley Solana Trust on Tuesday. The products trade on NYSE Arca under the tickers MSSE and MSOL, respectively.

MSSE seeks to track the performance of Ether, while MSOL follows SOL, the native asset of the Solana network. Both products charge an annual management fee of 0.14%, placing them among the lowest-cost US crypto exchange-traded products.

The launch followed the completion of the funds’ registration and listing process. NYSE Arca approved the products after Morgan Stanley submitted the required filings to the US Securities and Exchange Commission.

Although commonly described as ETFs, Morgan Stanley officially classifies MSSE and MSOL as exchange-traded products. Like spot crypto ETFs, they hold digital assets and allow investors to gain price exposure through traditional brokerage accounts without managing wallets or private keys.

Staking adds another source of returns

Both products can stake a portion of their holdings to earn blockchain rewards. Staking involves committing tokens to help validate transactions and secure a proof-of-stake network.

Regulatory filings show that MSSE plans to stake between 50% and 80% of its Ether. MSOL may stake up to 100% of its Solana holdings. Figment, Galaxy’s blockchain infrastructure business, and Coinbase Canada are listed among the staking providers.

Service providers and custodians will retain up to 5% of the staking rewards, with the remaining rewards allocated to the funds. However, returns will still depend largely on ETH and SOL price movements, while staking introduces additional operational, liquidity, and network risks.

Morgan Stanley’s entry could increase fee pressure across the US crypto fund market. Its 0.14% charge is below the management fees attached to many competing Ethereum and Solana products, although investors must also consider tracking differences and how each issuer distributes staking income.

US investors gain bank-backed crypto access

MSSE and MSOL are the first Ethereum and Solana exchange-traded products issued by an asset manager affiliated with a US bank. Their arrival gives US investors another regulated route to gain crypto exposure through taxable brokerage and eligible investment accounts.

Morgan Stanley entered the market earlier this year with the Morgan Stanley Bitcoin Trust, which trades under the MSBT ticker. The Bitcoin product held about $392 million in net assets as of July 24, according to the asset manager’s product page.

The bank has also expanded direct crypto access through E*TRADE, allowing customers to buy and sell Bitcoin, Ethereum, and Solana through accounts linked to crypto infrastructure provider Zerohash. Morgan Stanley has separately applied to establish a national trust bank focused on digital assets.

Its role in institutional crypto markets also extends beyond its own products. LMAX Group recently appointed Morgan Stanley and KBW to examine a potential sale or public listing that could value the trading company at up to $5 billion. LMAX is considering a direct sale, a special purpose acquisition company merger, or an initial public offering, with a Nasdaq listing reportedly its preferred route.

Crypto ETF flows remain uneven

Morgan Stanley’s launch comes during an uneven period for US crypto funds. Bitcoin ETFs have recorded three consecutive sessions of net outflows following a seven-day inflow streak, according to SoSoValue data.

Ethereum funds have posted net inflows on six of the past eight trading days. Solana products recorded four inflow days over the same period, alongside two sessions with no net flows.

Those mixed figures coincide with renewed weakness across the crypto market. Bitcoin pulled back after retesting the $65,000 level, while ETH and SOL also faced selling pressure as traders reduced exposure to risk assets.

The launch nevertheless broadens Morgan Stanley’s crypto offering during a period when traditional financial companies continue building digital asset products despite weaker prices. Initial trading volumes and asset inflows into MSSE and MSOL will show whether the bank’s brand, low fee, and staking structure can attract investors from established rivals.

Perpetual futures have become one of crypto’s defining financial products, but DRW CEO Don Wilson says much of what people think they know about them is wrong.

In a series of posts on X, Wilson argued that perpetual futures — or “perps” — are simply futures contracts without an expiration date. The features often associated with crypto perpetuals, such as high leverage, auto-deleveraging (ADL) and around-the-clock trading, are characteristics of how some crypto exchanges chose to implement the products, not the contracts themselves.

“Most of what people think they know about ‘perps’ … has nothing to do with the contract itself,” Wilson wrote.

His comments come as interest in bringing perpetual futures into regulated U.S. markets continues to grow. Several exchanges and market participants have explored launching perpetual futures beyond crypto, though questions remain over how the products should be regulated and whether they fit within existing futures or swaps frameworks. Kalshi, which saw perps trading explode shortly after launching, recently submitted a proposal with regulators to expand its offerings to precious metals.

Unlike traditional futures markets, crypto exchanges like Hyperliquid operate continuously, use digital collateral and can calculate margin requirements in real time. Those technological differences allowed exchanges to offer products with higher leverage and alternative liquidation mechanisms, including ADL, which automatically reduces winning positions when losing traders cannot cover their losses.

Wilson said those design choices should not be confused with perpetual futures themselves.

“I’m not a fan of ADL,” he wrote, adding that there is “no reason it needs to be used for perps.”

Instead, Wilson argued that digital payment rails create opportunities to improve risk management. Traditional clearinghouses generally calculate margin once a day, with market participants often having until the following business day to post additional collateral. Because markets can move significantly during that window, clearinghouses require relatively large initial margin buffers.

With real-time settlement, however, exchanges can recalculate margin continuously and require traders to post collateral immediately, reducing the need for large upfront margin requirements while maintaining the same level of protection, Wilson said. Whether exchanges choose to translate those efficiencies into higher leverage is a business decision, not a defining feature of perpetual futures.

Wilson said the real innovation of perpetual futures is that they eliminate the need for investors to repeatedly roll expiring contracts, reducing transaction costs, market impact and roll slippage while allowing positions to more closely track the front of the futures curve.

He also urged regulators to focus on economic substance rather than legal labels.

“There’s no reason to treat perpetuals as swaps simply because they don’t expire,” Wilson wrote. “Economically, they’re futures.”

Wilson concluded by calling for perpetual futures to be available across a broader range of markets, including commodities, securities and crypto, arguing that they should be viewed as another tool for price discovery and risk management rather than as a crypto-specific innovation.

Bitcoin slipped to ten-day lows at the opening of Wall Street on Tuesday, extending a broader risk-off move that followed a sharp sell-off in Asia-linked equities. As traders digested renewed pressure on global technology and AI supply chains, BTC trading weakened alongside US market futures before and during the start of US hours.

Crypto positioning also took a hit. Liquidation data indicates long positions were forced out quickly, with CoinGlass reporting more than $510 million wiped out over roughly 24 hours as the decline accelerated. Meanwhile, key benchmarks in semiconductor-heavy markets fell hard—underscoring how strongly crypto is still reacting to traditional market stress.

Key takeaways

• Bitcoin’s move to ten-day lows coincided with a US equities sell-off after steep declines in Asian markets.
• Semiconductor stocks led the reversal in Asia, with South Korea’s KOSPI closing down 10.8% in a day.
• Crypto derivatives liquidations for long positions surpassed $510 million over 24 hours, according to CoinGlass.
• BTC/USD dipped below $63,000 for the first time since July 17, setting up fresh levels traders will watch for follow-through.
• Analysts point to uncertainty around hyperscaler AI capex returns and intensifying competition from open-source AI.

Semiconductors trigger a wider risk-off swing

Tuesday’s pressure on Bitcoin was not isolated to crypto. Semiconductor losses spilled from Asia into US trading, amplifying the day’s bearish tone. In South Korea, the KOSPI Index finished down 10.8% in the session, with SK Hynix dropping 14.8%—a move that signals how quickly investors are repricing expectations for memory and chip-related demand.

The weakness wasn’t confined to one market. Japan’s Kioxia Holdings fell 18.3% on the day, highlighting a broader reset across parts of the semiconductor supply chain rather than a single company-specific issue.

In the US, the Nasdaq Composite was down more than 1% at the time of writing, as tech exposure dragged. Micron Technologies also reflected the intensity of the sell-off: the stock fell by over 10% at the open, then failed to sustain a rebound and reached its lowest levels since May 22.

AI infrastructure spending meets sharper scrutiny

A core theme behind the equity drawdown appears to be intensifying questions over the durability of hyperscaler capital expenditure. Investors are increasingly focused on whether the economics of large-scale AI infrastructure builds can justify the magnitude and pace of spending.

Coverage cited in the source notes that combined 2026 capex guidance from major hyperscalers—Alphabet, Microsoft, Amazon, and Meta—was tracking toward roughly $725–730 billion, with Wall Street projections suggesting it could rise toward $900 billion in 2027. Additional detail referenced alongside this is that Alphabet reported its first cash burn on record in the second quarter, totaling $5.9 billion, even as its cloud unit posted 82% growth.

For crypto traders, the implication is straightforward: if equities react to doubts about AI spending returns, high-beta assets like Bitcoin can face correlated selling pressure—especially when leverage is already elevated in crypto markets.

At the same time, the competitive narrative around AI is adding another layer of uncertainty. The source points to Moonshot AI’s Kimi K3 open-source model, launched two weeks prior to the report’s timeframe and benchmarked against leading proprietary systems from firms such as Anthropic and OpenAI. The argument being circulated is that if similar model capabilities can be achieved at lower cost, parts of the return assumptions for Western hyperscaler spending may be less certain.

Bitcoin breaks key levels as liquidations mount

Crypto didn’t escape the macro pressure. TradingView data referenced in the source shows BTC/USD dipping below $63,000 for the first time since July 17 as the day’s sell-off expanded into US hours.

As spot price weakness drew in leveraged participants, derivatives flows accelerated. CoinGlass liquidation data cited in the article indicates long liquidations cleared in excess of $510 million over 24 hours—an outcome consistent with sharp downside moves where stop-losses and margin calls cascade quickly.

On the risk side, the source includes commentary from CoinAnk warning of a potential long liquidation cascade below $64,700. CoinAnk noted that “extremely large long liquidity has accumulated below this level,” and added that upward movement may face less immediate resistance, with the $65,800 to $66,200 band described as a “major short liquidation zone.”

This framework matters for market participants because it ties price action to the mechanics of liquidation-driven volatility. When large clusters of orders sit near defined technical levels, the market can shift rapidly—not only because of new information, but because positioning unwinds.

What to watch next

Bitcoin’s next move will likely depend on whether the broader equity stress stabilizes or intensifies, especially as investors continue to reassess hyperscaler spending and AI infrastructure return assumptions. For traders and risk managers, the immediate focus should be on whether BTC can reclaim levels above recent breakdown points or whether liquidation dynamics extend further through the zones highlighted by CoinAnk and the broader long liquidations tracked by CoinGlass.

SBI Holdings has restructured a wholly owned subsidiary around the Canton Network, extending its institutional blockchain strategy beyond Ripple and the XRP Ledger.

SBI creates dedicated Canton Network business

SBI Holdings announced on July 28 that SBI Security Solutions had changed its name to SBI Digital Practice Co. Ltd., effective June 22.

The wholly owned subsidiary will now operate as SBI’s dedicated on-chain finance business specializing in the Canton Network. SBI has also renewed the company’s management structure to support the change.

SBI Digital Practice will plan, develop, and operate financial infrastructure and applications for institutions using Canton. Its services will cover implementation support, regulatory compliance, and transaction systems spanning different countries and currencies.

The subsidiary is based in Roppongi, Tokyo, and is led by representative director Ryo Shimotsu. SBI retains full ownership of the business.

SBI said it expects more financial products and transactions to move onto blockchain networks. The company wants the new unit to help banks and other financial institutions adopt the technology while meeting rules in their respective markets.

SBI has participated in Canton as a Super Validator, a network role involved in transaction approval and management, according to the company’s July 28 announcement.

SBI’s expansion does not signal a Ripple exit

The restructuring broadens SBI’s blockchain operations but does not indicate that the group is abandoning Ripple or the XRP Ledger.

SBI and Ripple established SBI Ripple Asia in 2016 to promote Ripple-based payment infrastructure across the Asia-Pacific region. Their joint venture has remained one of Ripple’s main institutional relationships in the region.

SBI Ripple Asia has continued developing XRP Ledger services, including a token issuance platform designed to help businesses create digital assets under Japanese regulatory requirements.

Canton serves a different part of SBI’s strategy. While Ripple’s infrastructure has mainly supported payments, stablecoins, and token issuance, the new subsidiary will focus on institutional financial infrastructure, cross-border securities, and systems that require transaction privacy.

The move therefore points to a multichain model in which SBI selects different networks for different financial products rather than depending on a single blockchain ecosystem.

Solana and Ondo deals widen SBI’s multichain strategy

Canton is the latest addition to a broader series of tokenization projects announced by SBI.

Earlier in July, SBI Global Asset Management partnered with regulated real-world asset exchange DigiFT to launch the SBI Japan High Dividend Equity Strategy Token, or JX token, on Solana. The product gives eligible institutional and accredited investors on-chain access to a Japanese equity strategy managed by SBI Asset Management.

DigiFT described JX as the first listed-equity strategy from a Japanese asset manager to be brought on-chain through its regulated infrastructure. The token does not distribute dividends directly, with returns instead reflected through the underlying growth strategy.

SBI also reached an agreement with Ondo Finance to tokenize Japanese equities and use its yen-backed JPYSC stablecoin for settlement and collateral. Ondo Global Markets (BVI) Limited will issue the products, while SBI plans to distribute them through its financial platforms.

The related tokens have not been registered under the U.S. Securities Act and cannot be offered to U.S. persons unless registered or covered by an exemption, according to the partnership announcement.

SBI separately acquired a majority stake in Singapore exchange Coinhako on July 16 after receiving approval from the Monetary Authority of Singapore. The deal gives SBI another regulated distribution channel for digital assets in Asia.

Canton connects SBI to U.S. Treasury tokenization

SBI said Canton has more than 600 participating institutions, including Goldman Sachs, BNP Paribas, Franklin Templeton, Broadridge, and Euroclear. It placed the value of assets represented on the network above $6 trillion.

The U.S. connection comes through the Depository Trust & Clearing Corporation. DTCC and Digital Asset announced plans in December 2025 to tokenize a subset of U.S. Treasury securities held at the Depository Trust Company on Canton.

The partners targeted a controlled production launch during the first half of 2026, followed by a broader rollout based on market demand. A July transaction conducted through Tradeweb later paired an on-chain U.S. Treasury with USDCx and settled the assets through Canton.

SBI has not disclosed specific customers, launch dates, or revenue targets for its new subsidiary. Its latest restructuring nevertheless places Canton alongside Ripple, Solana, Ondo, JPYSC, and Coinhako within a wider institutional digital asset strategy.

Digital infrastructure company Core Scientific more than doubled its second-quarter revenue as rapid growth in its artificial intelligence and high-performance computing (HPC) colocation business continued to reshape its earnings profile following its pivot beyond Bitcoin mining.

The company reported Tuesday that Q2 revenue increased to $164.2 million, up from $78.6 million a year earlier. Colocation revenue accounted for $136.7 million of the total, compared with just $10.6 million in the same period last year, while gross profit increased to $70 million from $5 million.

Despite the revenue surge, Core Scientific reported a net loss of $1.15 billion, driven primarily by a non-cash accounting charge related to the rising value of outstanding warrants as its share price increased.

The results underscore how several Bitcoin mining companies have diversified into AI and HPC infrastructure, seeking more stable, long-term revenue streams as demand for data center capacity surges.

Once one of the world’s largest publicly traded Bitcoin miners, Core Scientific now generates the bulk of its revenue from colocation services while maintaining a comparatively modest Bitcoin treasury of fewer than 1,000 BTC, according to industry data.

Core Scientific shares fell more than 4% following the earnings release, trimming its year-to-date gains.

Core Scientific (CORZ) stock is up 36% this year. Source: Yahoo Finance

Related: CoreWeave shows how crypto-era infrastructure quietly became AI’s backbone

AMD partnership expands AI footprint

Alongside its earnings, Core Scientific announced a partnership with Advanced Micro Devices (AMD), the semiconductor company that designs CPUs and AI-focused graphics processors competing with Intel (INTC) and Nvidia (NVDA).

The agreement could ultimately support up to 2.5 gigawatts of leasable data center capacity. It is initially anchored by 15-year agreements covering 530 megawatts across several US sites beginning in 2027, with the potential to expand over time.

Core Scientific said the broader partnership has the potential to generate more than $14 billion in contracted base revenue, while its total leased customer power capacity now stands at roughly 1.1 GW, representing more than $24 billion in potential contracted revenue.

Earlier this month, IREN disclosed $2.8 billion in cloud contracts with AI developers, while Hut 8 unveiled a $9.8 billion lease agreement with an unnamed customer for capacity at its AI data campus.

Related: Crypto market breakout could accelerate as AI trade cools, analyst says

Liquidity begets liquidity, so the saying goes.

Hyperliquid, as its name suggests, has become the decentralized exchange of choice for many traders, particularly those who want to trade perpetual futures or “perps,” blockchain-based derivatives contracts that allow users to speculate on the price of an asset with leverage and no expiration date.

Created by Harvard classmates Jeff Yan and a pseudonymous developer known as iliensinc, Hyperliquid, which went live at the start of 2023, is capitalizing on its volume and depth of order book by offering firms something akin to composibility: the concept from decentralized finance (DeFi), whereby permissionless smart contracts can slot together like money LEGOs, the building blocks of new tokenized financial products.

Hyperliquid’s Ethereum-compatible HyperEVM connects directly to its super-fast homegrown HyperCore blockchain, allowing other applications to compose atop the platform’s shared liquidity rather than fragmenting it. In other words, applications like wallets or even other exchanges can piggyback on Hyperliquid, using it as a backend to offer perps trading and other services.

As more builders deploy on and integrate Hyperliquid, liquidity deepens, the variety of assets expands, and network effects compound. There are now hundreds of developers — including big names like MetaMask, Phantom wallet and South African exchange VALR — using Hyperliquid’s system of “builder codes.” Builders have generated some $90 million in revenue so far, according to Flowscan.

A growing army of acolytes can’t praise the platform enough.

“Hyperliquid is not just a perpetuals exchange, it’s more like the AWS for finance,” said Hansu Jian, CEO of Hyperion DeFi, the first U.S.-listed treasury company focused on Hyperliquid’s native token HYPE.

“The perps part is great, but this is really a layer-one blockchain infrastructure. The service on offer is actually liquidity, and having all these markets work well, and allowing anyone to build things on top of them,” Jian said in an interview.

Similar to AWS for cloud infrastructure, builders own their users and fully control the user interface, while Hyperliquid provides the underlying liquidity and execution. Builder code integrators charge fees on the notional size of their users’ trades without developing the backend or maintaining liquidity.

“Builder codes let integrators focus on what they do best, delivering a great user experience, while Hyperliquid serves as the backend for liquidity and execution,” said Sterling Barnett, business development lead at Hyperliquid Labs, via email. “Integrators can offer their users best-in-class onchain liquidity and institutional-grade infrastructure, and earn fees on every trade.”

For an app like MetaMask, the Ethereum-based wallet that reports over 100 million users worldwide, it makes perfect sense to fuse with Hyperliquid’s EVM module. MetaMask has given its users self-custodial access to perps directly from the wallet since October of 2025.

Being a wallet has the advantage that there’s no decentralized app (dApp) to connect to, while fund transfers are streamlined to the point where users can trade directly with the tokens they already hold, said Matthieu Saint Olive, Staff Product Manager at MetaMask. It plugs into MetaMask’s money account, social login, and follow trading and leaves Hyperliquid to handle matching, the oracle, and the margin engine, he said.

“Matching orders is genuinely hard, and Hyperliquid is excellent at it, so we don’t try to rebuild it,” said Saint Olive via email. “By routing orders straight to the Hyperliquid order book, MetaMask Perps offers some of the best liquidity and execution quality available anywhere. ”

MetaMask said it’s seeing growth beyond crypto towards things like commodities and equities, according to Saint Olive. “Real-world-asset markets have gone from a small slice of perp volume at the start of 2026 to roughly a quarter of it today,” he said.

When it comes to fees, MetaMask charges a flat 0.1% builder fee, disclosed up front, with no hidden spread and nothing buried in execution, so a trader can verify exactly what they paid. “We think that transparency is the real advantage, and we’re actively exploring more innovative pricing models, because we want the economics to be a reason people choose MetaMask, not a source of friction,” Saint Olive added.

It’s more surprising to find a large centralized exchange handing over liquidity requirements to Hyperliquid’s perps order book. But taking the Hyperliquid route has proved a good option for South Africa-based exchange VALR, ranked among the largest exchanges in Africa with close to two million retail customers and about 2,000 corporate institutional customers, according to the exchange’s CEO and co-founder, Farzam Ehsani.

Having started out offering customers spot market, spot margin, and then perpetuals, the team at VALR built all the infrastructure in-house, including risk and liquidation engines, Ehsani said. Despite all the hard work that went into launching perpetual futures, Ehsani said candidly that it was difficult to get volume and liquidity.

“So perpetual futures on our own books didn’t take off as we had hoped they would, predominantly because of the liquidity and volume,” Ehsani said in an interview. “Our volume is our volume; we are truthful and transparent and don’t do any wash trading or anything like that. We saw Hyperliquid bringing a huge amount of volume and market participants from all over the world together and thought, ‘Why don’t we plug into that?’”

Looking ahead, when the likes of Robinhood, Coinbase, Intercontinental Exchange and others go full throttle into offering perps, there will be opportunities for cross-venue arbitrage, according to Jian of Hyperion.

“Say you are maintaining one position on Robinhood, for example, and the other side of the position on Hyperliquid,” Jian said. “Then, because you have a lot of what’s called non-toxic flow, which is when more retail users are just purely entering and exiting the market, you’ll be able to see more organic mechanisms for funding rates.”

“I’m very supportive of moving the CLARITY Act forward, so we can get some market structure in place and start to move the innovation process along,” Solomon said.

SoFi CEO Anthony Noto welcomed Goldman Sachs’ support, noting on X that the two firms have taken a different stance than some banks on crypto regulation.

“Durable rules for digital assets are critical for U.S. global competitiveness,” Noto wrote. “It protects consumers and lets us build safely under homegrown regulation. Congress should pass it immediately.”

The growing chorus of support comes as the bill enters a critical stretch on Capitol Hill.

Senate negotiators recently unveiled updated legislative text that merges House and Senate proposals and, for the first time, outlined how ethics restrictions for senior government officials involved with crypto could work. That issue has become one of the biggest sticking points in negotiations, with lawmakers still debating whether the proposal goes far enough to address concerns surrounding President Donald Trump’s crypto business interests.

Even with revised language in hand, the Senate isn’t expected to take up the bill immediately. Majority Leader John Thune has shifted the chamber’s focus to judicial nominations and a Russia sanctions package, leaving the Clarity Act waiting for floor time.

Bitcoin (BTC) hit ten-day lows at Tuesday’s Wall Street open as BTC price action followed a US stocks sell-off.

Key points:

• Bitcoin price action reacts to contagion from an Asia stocks sell-off as it hits US markets.
• Chip makers are at the epicenter of the reversal with South Korea’s KOSPI Index closing the day down 10.8%
• Crypto long liquidations pass $500 million in 24 hours.

Semiconductor giants fuel major Asia stock comedown

Semiconductor-led losses from Asia spilled over into US trading. South Korea’s KOSPI Index finished the day down 10.8% in a single session, fueled by 14.8% losses for chip-maker SK Hynix, while Japan’s memory manufacturer Kioxia Holdings fell 18.3% on the day.

In the US, the tech-heavy Nasdaq Composite Index was down just over 1% at the time of writing. Notably, semiconductor manufacturer Micron Technologies, which fell by more than 10% at the open, erased a rebound and saw its lowest levels since May 22.

Micron Technologies one-week chart. Source: Cointelegraph/TradingView

Semiconductor stocks are contending with intensifying scrutiny over the sustainability of hyperscaler capital expenditure. Investors increasingly question whether the underlying economics of AI infrastructure buildouts can justify their scale. Combined 2026 capex guidance from Alphabet, Microsoft, Amazon, and Meta is now tracking toward $725–730 billion, with Wall Street projecting that figure could climb toward $900 billion in 2027. Alphabet posted its first cash burn on record in the second quarter, at $5.9 billion, even as its cloud unit posted 82% growth.

Layered on top of the financing concerns are competitive pressures on US-based AI companies from Chinese startups. Moonshot AI’s Kimi K3 open source model, first launched two weeks ago, was benchmarked competitively against top proprietary systems from Anthropic and OpenAI. This has intensified questions about the return profile assumed by the spending commitments of Western hyperscalers, given their capabilities may be replicated at a fraction of the cost.

Crypto short liquidations pass $500 million

Today’s sell-off in the semiconductor and AI sector has not left Bitcoin unscathed. Data from TradingView showed BTC/USD dipping below $63,000 for the first time since July 17.

BTC/USD four-hour chart. Source: Cointelegraph/TradingView

Crypto markets saw elevated long liquidations on the back of the day’s reversal, with data from CoinGlass putting these in excess of $510 million over 24 hours.

Related: Markets eye Bank of Japan meeting on Friday as yen repeats 40-year US dollar lows

Cryptocurrency liquidation history (screenshot). Source: CoinGlass

On Monday, crypto analytics platform CoinAnk warned of the risk of a long liquidation “cascade” below $64,700.

“Extremely large long liquidity has accumulated below this level,” it commented.

CoinAnk added that to the upside, little resistance remained, with the area between $65,800 and $66,200 being a “major short liquidation zone.”

Clear Creek Financial Management disclosed about $15.1 million across Bitcoin, Ethereum, XRP, and Solana exchange-traded funds in its latest US regulatory filing.

Clear Creek’s Bitcoin ETF holdings top $10 million

Clear Creek’s largest disclosed crypto position was the Bitwise Bitcoin ETF (BITB). The investment adviser reported owning 304,155 shares valued at about $9.69 million at the end of the reporting period.

The firm also held approximately $477,412 in BlackRock’s iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF and $248,539 in the Grayscale Bitcoin Trust ETF. Together, its three Bitcoin ETF positions were worth roughly $10.4 million.

BITB accounted for close to 93% of the firm’s disclosed Bitcoin ETF allocation. Clear Creek manages more than $1.5 billion in assets, placing the crypto positions at a relatively small share of its wider portfolio.

Form 13F requires institutional investment managers overseeing at least $100 million in qualifying US securities to disclose certain long positions every quarter. However, the reports are backward-looking and do not include cash, short positions or assets that fall outside the filing rules.

Clear Creek could therefore have increased, reduced or exited some positions after the reporting date.

Ethereum becomes the firm’s second-largest crypto allocation

Ethereum ETFs formed Clear Creek’s second-largest digital asset allocation at almost $4.3 million.

The firm reported 337,162 shares of the Bitwise Ethereum ETF, valued at approximately $3.8 million. It also disclosed 14,336 shares of the iShares Ethereum Trust worth $170,455.

Clear Creek held a further 21,374 shares of the Grayscale Ethereum Staking ETF, valued at $321,251. The staking product gives investors exposure to ETH while incorporating rewards generated through Ethereum’s proof-of-stake network, subject to the fund’s structure and fees.

Separately, Morgan Stanley launched Ethereum and Solana staking ETFs on July 28. The products charge a management fee of 0.14%, adding another major Wall Street name to the expanding US crypto fund market.

The developments show how regulated products are giving investment advisers several ways to allocate to the same digital asset, including products from Bitwise, BlackRock, Grayscale and Morgan Stanley.

XRP and Solana ETFs broaden Clear Creek’s strategy

Clear Creek also reported smaller positions tied to XRP and Solana, taking its disclosed crypto ETF portfolio beyond the two largest digital assets.

The investment manager held 11,621 shares of the Bitwise XRP ETF, valued at $135,501 at the reporting date.

Its Solana allocation was split between two funds. Clear Creek owned 11,258 shares of the Bitwise Solana Staking ETF worth $112,693 and 28,144 shares of the Grayscale Solana Staking ETF valued at $155,636.

Those positions brought the firm’s total reported Solana ETF exposure to about $268,329. Although small compared with its Bitcoin and Ethereum holdings, the allocations show that some US advisers are using regulated funds to gain exposure to a wider group of crypto assets.

Morgan Stanley also recently disclosed an XRP ETF position, providing another example of traditional financial firms moving beyond Bitcoin-only exposure.

US and global crypto ETF markets continue expanding

Clear Creek’s filing arrives as the SEC considers changes to how it reviews a growing pipeline of ETF proposals.

Brian Daly, an official in the SEC’s Division of Investment Management, said the agency receives roughly 200 ETF applications each month, according to Bloomberg ETF analyst Eric Balchunas. Daly also acknowledged that the regulator had handled crypto poorly and wanted a more orderly process for reviewing novel products.

The SEC is reportedly considering confidential ETF filings, which could allow issuers to submit proposals privately before making them public. Such a system could protect new fund ideas from competitors while regulators conduct an initial review.

Other markets are also examining broader crypto fund access. Japan could allow its first Bitcoin ETF by 2028 as regulators prepare rules permitting investment trusts and ETFs to hold digital assets directly.

For US investors, Clear Creek’s disclosure does not prove that the firm remains invested at the same levels today. It does, however, provide a documented view of how one registered adviser distributed its crypto exposure across four assets and several competing issuers.