The Access to Neighbouring Land Act 1992 gives neighbours the right to enter your property in certain circumstances to carry out essential preservation work, including those that require scaffolding.

One 9 Scaffolding, a commercial scaffolding company, is urging homeowners to be aware of their legal obligations and to communicate clearly with neighbours if such a situation arises.

John Khan, a home maintenance expert at One 9 Scaffolding, said: “Nobody wants to hear that their neighbour needs to use their garden for building work, especially when it could mean scaffolding, builders and equipment turning up next door.

“But it’s worth knowing that simply saying no isn’t always the end of the story.

“There are some situations where the law can allow access for essential repairs, although that doesn’t mean your neighbour can just walk into your garden whenever they like.

“If scaffolding is needed, the best thing to do is talk through what’s needed, where it’ll go and how long it’ll be there.

“Getting everything clear from the start can save a lot of awkwardness and help stop a small job turning into a neighbourly dispute.”

The company recommends several steps for homeowners if a neighbour requests access to their garden.

These include asking why access is needed, how long the work will take, and exactly where scaffolding will be placed.

It also advises discussing how any garden features—such as lawns, plants, fences, or patios—will be protected throughout the project.

One 9 Scaffolding suggests keeping a written record of anything agreed, even if relations with the neighbour are friendly, to avoid potential disputes later.

The main message is not to refuse access outright without understanding the legal context, as there are circumstances where entry can be granted by law.

However, communication remains key to preventing misunderstandings and ensuring that both parties are clear about what will happen and for how long.

Recommended Reading

The company warns that failing to reach an agreement early on can turn a simple repair job into a source of ongoing tension.

By approaching the situation calmly and constructively, homeowners and neighbours can reach solutions that work for both sides.

Did you know about this law? Let us know in the comments.

Only four people have claimed redress for mistreatment under the pre-2000 “gay ban” in the armed forces, according to data from the charity Fighting With Pride.

Fewer women veterans are also believed to have come forward than expected, the charity said.

Fighting With Pride, which advocates on behalf of the LGBT forces community, in June launched its “Battle for Lost Veterans” campaign, urging those yet to come forward to apply for financial redress.

It believes there are approximately 1,000 people eligible for the scheme yet to have made a claim.

Former Darlington MP Peter Gibson, Fighting With Pride chief executive, said: “At Fighting With Pride, we’re determined to find every last veteran who’s owed justice. Nobody should be left behind.

“As the only LGBTQ+-specific armed forces charity, we will help anyone impacted by the ban to apply for what is rightfully yours, before it’s too late.

Former Darlington MP Peter Gibson (Image: THE NORTHERN ECHO)

“If you know anyone who served and suffered under this outrageous historic policy, please help us find everyone. We can be contacted via our Fighting With Pride website.

“We’re determined to restore pride and dignity in service.”

The charity has also called on more women veterans to make applications for the scheme.

Some 61 per cent of women who took part in a judge-led inquiry into the ban reported mistreatment under the ban, yet less than half of those who have come forward so far are women.

Dawn Loynes, a Royal Navy veteran who was unlawfully dismissed in 1994, encouraged other women to come forward to claim redress.

Royal Navy veteran Dawn Loynes was unlawfully dismissed in 1994. (Image: Dawn Loynes/PA Wire)

She said: “The mistreatment I experienced as a young female sailor had a profound and lasting impact on my life. While nothing can undo what happened, reconnecting with my military family, receiving my beret, and having my experiences recognised have all been important steps in my healing.

“I know that for many people affected by the ban, coming forward can feel daunting. Revisiting painful memories and reliving experiences that many have spent years trying to move beyond can be difficult and deeply emotional. Everyone’s journey is different, but it is important to know that you do not have to face that journey alone, and support is available throughout the process.”

The veteran added: “If sharing my story gives even one person the confidence to take that first step, then speaking publicly will have been worthwhile.

“Your experiences matter, your service matters, and what happened to you deserves to be recognised.

“Please do not leave it too late. If you think you may be eligible, I encourage you to explore your options and seek advice soonest.”

Almost £20 million of the £75 million the Government has set aside for the redress scheme is yet to be distributed.

LGBT servicemen and women face the ever-nearing deadline of December 12 to apply for the Government’s financial redress scheme, which awards £50,000 discharge payments, and up to £20,000 in additional impact payments.

Under the ban, which was in place between 1967 and 2000, men and women in the army, navy, and air force were subjected to brutal interrogation and bullying, and forced out of service, often with long-term impacts on their life and careers.

Donald Trump said that if he weren’t President, both Israel and the entire Middle East ‘would be gone’ as he defended the war in Iran.

The President’s comments were broadcast on the same night that US and Iranian attacks ratcheted up again after a weeks-long lull in the now six month war. 

Speaking to Fox News, Trump called the Iranian government ‘violent, evil people’ and repeated that they could never have a nuclear weapon, saying that both Israel and the entire region would be wiped off the map.  

‘If they had a nuclear weapon, Israel would be gone. If I weren’t President, Israel would be gone and there would probably be no Middle East,’ he said. 

Trump explained that Iran has now angered all of its allies and those who were ‘sort of neutral, got along with them’ once the war began.  

‘As soon as the shooting started, they started aiming at Saudi Arabia, Qatar, at UAE, at Bahrain, at Kuwait, everybody was shocked. I was surprised.’

Trump admitted that it was a positive from his perspective because the Iranians ‘lost all of the support they had.’

However, he fears that Iran’s turncoat behavior against its neighboring nations means ‘if they would have had a nuclear weapon, they would have fired it.’ 

‘If they had a nuclear weapon, Israel would be gone. If I weren’t President, Israel would be gone and there would probably be no Middle East,’ Trump claimed

‘I think the Middle East would have essentially been gone but Israel definitely would have been gone and I guess we would be next, or Europe or someplace,’ he added.

Trump reaffirmed his promise, however, that ‘you cannot let them have a nuclear weapon and they won’t have a nuclear weapon.’ 

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu ruled out any diplomatic deal with Iran as he backed Donald Trump’s new economic campaign earlier this week. 

Speaking at an event in Jerusalem for Israeli settlers in the occupied West Bank, Netanyahu said he told Trump in a meeting at the White House last month: ‘I doubt that an agreement can be reached with that group there, with those savages.

‘I tell you – an agreement cannot be reached.’

Netanyahu added the two also discussed renewing military action against Iran: ‘We will not allow Iran to attack us, and if, God forbid, they attack us, they will suffer a blow beyond anything they have imagined– far stronger than anything they have suffered until now’

The prime minister also hailed the US president’s new campaign after Trump on Monday declared ‘economic D-Day’ aimed at destroying Iran’s economy.

The President stressed earlier this week that he’s ‘not in a hurry’ to get Iran back to the negotiating table, and he continues making the case that the Islamic Republic’s leadership is on the ropes.

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu (pictured left) ruled out any diplomatic deal with Iran as he backed Donald Trump’s new economic campaign earlier this week

Advertisement

Iran’s supreme leader, Ayatollah Mojtaba Khamenei (pictured), urged rulers of Muslim nations to ‘know your real enemy, understand its plans and confront it,’ and called the US and Israel enemies of all Islamic nations Sunday

‘They’re not paying their troops. They’re in deep trouble. They have very little capacity,’ Trump told reporters Thursday. ‘We don’t want to speak to them. We’re not looking to meet or anything,’ he said.

Iran’s supreme leader, Ayatollah Mojtaba Khamenei, urged rulers of Muslim nations to ‘know your real enemy, understand its plans and confront it,’ and called the US and Israel enemies of all Islamic nations Sunday, the official IRNA news agency reported.

Six months after the US and Israel attacked Iran, killing Khamenei’s father and other senior leaders, the younger Khamenei still has not been seen publicly. 

His comments came in a letter to religious leaders attending a conference in Tehran.

US forces made their first strikes at Iran in over a month Sunday, firing at two rocket launchers on the Strait of Hormuz, with Tehran responding by attacking American forces in Jordan. 

The fresh fury erupts after forces with the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) were seen preparing to launch rockets with sea mines into the strait, Central Command spokesman Captain Tim Hawkins confirmed to The Daily Mail.   

‘US forces are monitoring the area closely and remain prepared to protect the free flow of commerce through this essential waterway,’ Hawkins said.    

The US military last week completed clearing sea mines from the strait’s international shipping routes, he added. Iranian news outlets reported sounds of explosions near Larak Island on the strait.  

Crowds fill a street during celebrations marking Prophet Muhammad’s birthday in Tehran, Iran, Sunday

The IRGC in a statement carried by Iran’s state broadcaster noted ‘the martyrdom and injury of several of our fighters and compatriots.’

The statement said the attack will ‘result in punishment of the aggressor.’

Shortly following the US strikes, Fox News reported that Iranian forces were attacking American troops stationed in Jordan.

Almost all of the incoming missiles have been intercepted and there have been no significant impacts, Fox said. 

The fighting comes just days after the Trump administration said it would turn its focus to increasing economic pressure – rather than military action – to try to end its war with Iran.

Secretary Scott Bessent told ​Reuters Sunday that the Treasury Department is likely ​to unveil new secondary sanctions ‌aimed at increasing economic pressure on Iran.

Bessent announced the measure after imposing penalties on the ⁠United Arab Emirates branches of Egypt’s ​Banque Misr on Friday over alleged ​financial links to Iran.

The shifting strategy centers on threats to punish any country or entity that continues to conduct business with Tehran.

Sailors conduct night flight operations aboard USS George Washington (CVN 73) as the ship sails in regional waters supporting operations in the Middle East

Forces with the Revolutionary Guard Corps were seen preparing to launch rockets with sea mines into the strait

Advertisement

The turn to using sanctions as the cudgel of choice comes as the administration weighs diminished munitions stockpiles after months of war, sparking concerns that the prolonged conflict could undermine US military readiness in other parts of the globe.

Trump has consistently emphasized that the US and Israel campaign has been devastating for Iran´s navy and air force. 

Iranian officials have said the country has suffered $270 billion in direct and indirect damage.

Israeli military strikes in the first weeks of the war wiped out much of the theocratic government’s leadership structure.

But Iran has found leverage through its own strikes in the critical Strait of Hormuz where relatively few vessels carrying oil and liquefied natural gas are risking passage.

Iran still has enough drones and missiles to fire at vessels transiting the vital energy waterway, through which 20 percent of the world’s oil normally flows, effectively controlling much of the traffic in the strait.

Trump has repeatedly declared that the ‘Strait of Hormuz is open,’ saying 24 vessels passed through last week. But that´s a fraction of the roughly 130 vessels that passed through the vital waterway daily before the war began.

Earlier on Sunday, a multinational coalition overseen by the US Navy said commercial traffic through the strait remained at ‘reduced levels.’ 

And a monitoring agency run by the British military said an unknown projectile struck a tanker ship on Saturday north of Khasab, Oman, in the strait.

The United Kingdom Maritime Trade Organization said the ship had been moving inbound and no casualties or environmental impact had been reported. 

It cited unspecified military authorities. There was no immediate claim of responsibility.

A return to open conflict would be dangerous for the region, where Iran has targeted US military bases and infrastructure in Gulf countries since the war began on February 28.

The last time the US military confirmed targeting Iran was on July 29, when it announced a ‘heavy wave of strikes’ on dozens of Revolutionary Guard targets including coastal surveillance and defense sites. 

On August 1, Trump said he would order the military to hold off on new strikes at the urging of Gulf allies Qatar, Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates.

Shailene Woodley has revealed that she filmed three scenes as Mary Jane Watson for The Amazing Spider-Man 2, but was told a year later that her character had been cut so she could be introduced in a planned third film that was never made.

The Divergent star was cast as Mary Jane Watson in 2013 and spent three days filming with Andrew Garfield as Peter Parker for the 2014 sequel. Her scenes were cut while the film was in production, with director Marc Webb saying he had decided to streamline the story around Peter and Emma Stone’s Gwen Stacy.

The Amazing Spider-Man 2 was the second of two films starring Andrew Garfield as Peter Parker/Spider-Man, after Webb’s 2012 reboot, which also starred Emma Stone as Gwen Stacy and Rhys Ifans as the villainous Lizard.

Sony had announced a third film, initially scheduled for 2016 and later moved to 2018, but it was never made.

During a career retrospective for the SAG-AFTRA Foundation’s Conversations series, Woodley talked about the “fun phone call” in which she was told she was no longer in the film.

“I was cast as Mary Jane for Spider-Man, which was my dream because Spider-Man’s my favourite superhero. Mary Jane was my favourite character growing up,” she said. “So, when I got it, I was like, ‘This is so exciting.’”

She added that she had filmed “ three scenes together” with Garfield, but was told a year later that she had been dropped from the film.

“I was like, ‘What? What do you mean?’ And they were like, ‘We’ve introduced a lot of new characters in this last one, and we’re going to wait for whatever happens between Emma [Stone] and Andrew [Garfield],” Woodley said.

The Amazing Spider-Man 2 follows Peter Parker struggling to balance his relationship with Gwen with his life as Spider-Man while battling the super-powered Electro (Jamie Foxx) and his former friend Harry Osborn (Dane DeHaan), who becomes the Green Goblin. In the film, after Harry abducts Gwen and takes her to a clock tower, Peter defeats him but fails to save Gwen when she falls to her death.

Watch Apple TV+ free for 7 day

New subscribers only. £9.99/mo. after free trial. Plan auto-renews until cancelled.

Try for free

ADVERTISEMENT. If you sign up to this service we will earn commission. This revenue helps to fund journalism across The Independent.

Woodley explained that the film’s team intended to “wait for [Gwen] to die and then we’ll introduce Mary Jane”. “Which made sense. But then they didn’t make that film,” Woodley said.

“But again, who knows what the truth is. I could have been terrible and they’re like, ‘We can’t do this,’” she joked.

Webb told The Hollywood Reporter in 2013 that he “made a creative decision to streamline the story and focus on Peter and Gwen and their relationship”, adding that Woodley was “an incredibly talented actress”.

Woodley also said at the time that she understood the decision, telling Entertainment Weekly: “Of course I’m bummed,” but adding that she was “a firm believer in everything happening for a specific reason” and understood “the need for holding off on introducing [Mary Jane] until the next film”.

In February 2015, Sony and Marvel Studios struck a deal to bring Spider-Man into the Marvel Cinematic Universe, with Sony retaining ownership and control of the film franchise while Marvel’s Kevin Feige joined as producer.

Andrew Garfield’s version of Peter Parker was dropped, and Tom Holland was cast in the role that June, making his debut in Captain America: Civil War before starring in Spider-Man: Homecoming in 2017.

Holland has since played Peter in three solo films, most recently Spider-Man: Brand New Day, which was released in July 2026 and sees Peter fighting crime full-time in a world that no longer remembers him.

Fifteen Britons are missing in China after devastating floods swept through parts of Tibet and Nepal, with authorities still struggling to establish the whereabouts of hundreds of people caught in the disaster.

Chinese authorities said 261 foreign nationals from 23 countries were missing in the Tibet autonomous region. The missing include 15 British citizens, 104 Nepalis, 49 Indians, 33 people from Latvia and 18 Americans.

The latest figures mean 48 British nationals are now reported missing on both sides of the Nepal-China border.

Thirty-three Britons had previously been reported missing in Nepal.

Some of those missing in Nepal were believed to have been visiting the region on pilgrimage.

Among them are sisters Hemangini Jitendra Patel and Hema Sunil Amin, who were last known to have been seen at the Friendship Bridge linking Nepal and China, the Guardian reported.

The disaster began on Wednesday after a massive glacier collapse in the Himalayas triggered flash floods that swept through communities and engulfed the Gyirong port area on the border.

At least 903 people have now been confirmed dead in Nepal and China, according to figures released by authorities on Sunday, while more than 3,000 people remain unaccounted for.

The number of missing Americans has also become the subject of conflicting figures. China reported 18 missing US nationals, while the US state department said at least 85 American citizens were unaccounted for.

Tommy Pigott, a state department spokesperson, said it had been difficult to obtain reliable information from the affected region, “made even more so by the devastation and the remoteness that we see”.

Chinese authorities have reported at least 16 deaths on their side of the border.

However, concerns have been raised about the transparency of casualty figures from China, where authorities have restricted the circulation of footage showing the extent of the flooding.

Search and rescue operations have been complicated by severe weather, the risk of landslides and uncertainty over whether some missing people were in Nepal or China when the floods struck.

China has deployed more than 2,100 rescue workers to the affected area, according to state television, along with specialist equipment to locate people trapped beneath debris. Supplies and equipment have also been delivered by air.

Chinese premier Li Qiang has travelled to the region as rescue and relief operations continue.

Chinese president Xi Jinping said on Monday that China was making every effort to find people missing after a mudslide near the Tibet-Nepal border, Xinhua reported.

On the Nepalese side, police said 794 people had been confirmed dead and at least 2,742 injured. Authorities have warned residents in several areas to remain prepared for further flooding and possible evacuations.

The British government has sent a rapid deployment team to Nepal and committed £5m in aid.

A UK Foreign Office spokesperson said: “We are working around the clock to support British nationals and their families affected by the devastating floods on the Nepal-China border. We are coordinating closely with the Nepali and Chinese authorities and have deployed consular support staff to the region to ensure British nationals can access support.”

Rescue teams are continuing to search for missing people as authorities face difficult conditions and a rapidly evolving situation across the mountainous border region.

If travelling light is high on your list of holiday priorities, especially if you want to avoid extra-baggage charges, why not consider a clothing-optional resort?

Better still, head to France’s picturesque Languedoc region, home to the world’s largest nudist community.

For many, the thought of shopping, eating out and clubbing naked probably sounds like a nightmare.

But for visitors to Cap d’Agde’s Naturist Village, it’s just another day.

Residents and visitors go about life — dining at beachfront restaurants, grabbing a coffee, or simply strolling around — in the nude, all within a designated, controlled area.

There are very few places of this scale in Europe, indeed the world, and the vibe is unashamedly, er, libertine.

Once I overcame my initial fear and embarrassment, I realised that even the most seemingly perfect bodies are imperfect in some way. 

Fat or thin, tall or short, we are all different.

If body confidence is an issue, I can highly recommend spending time among hundreds of naked people: it is a surprisingly effective way to overcome shame or whatever’s going on in your head.

The growing popularity of naturist holidays reflects a broader interest in experiences that offer freedom from body-image pressures, the chance to spend time outdoors without worrying about dress codes, and a more relaxed approach to socialising.

For some, it is about reconnecting with nature. For others, it is simply the novelty of trying a holiday where clothes are optional and judgment is meant to be left at the gate. 

Tucked away to the west of the French Riviera, Cap d’Agde began as a campsite in 1956, established by French brothers René and Paul Oltra.

The story goes that, after work, they enjoyed skinny-dipping in the Mediterranean alongside German holidaymakers.

They decided to turn their land into a holiday destination for like-minded people who preferred doing things nude.

In 1963, as part of a local government tourism initiative, the Languedoc-Roussillon region oversaw the creation of the seaside resort of Cap d’Agde and the campsite’s transformation into a fully-fledged naturist village.

Today, it features large Brutalist blocks of flats, shopping arcades and restaurants.

Think The Hunger Games meets Blackpool, with full English breakfasts, pizza and rotisserie chicken on offer.

It is not to everyone’s taste, but visitors are unlikely to be there for the cuisine or architecture.

Now celebrating its 70th anniversary, the René Oltra campsite remains a key destination for naturists.

It offers pitches for tents and motorhomes, as well as chalets, mobile homes and wooden cabins.

Guests get a pass based on the length of their stay, together with a token allowing entry to the village.

Inside the walled resort, which can accommodate up to 40,000 at its busiest, you can shop everywhere from patisseries and charcuteries to stores selling local red, white and rosé wines from the Languedoc region, France’s third-largest wine-producing area…completely in the buff. 

There is plenty of fun to be had browsing shops selling skimpy evening wear and fetish gear, both of which are commonplace here.

Cheap, stretchy polyester and nylon are the order of the day: the shorter and more revealing, the better.

Those seeking full-on fetish wear will be spoilt for choice, while sex toys, whips and floggers are also widely available.

Penis-shaped key rings and bottle openers are impossible to miss.

When the sun goes down, the village quickly changes from naked to outrageously clothed.

What began as a purely naturist resort has also become a destination for swingers from around the world.

Clubs line the streets, advertising foam parties, BDSM workshops and opportunities for couples to play with others in one of the many venues around the resort.

Having visited Cap d’Agde seven times over more than two decades, I have become fond of the people-watching.

It is not simply voyeurism: the village brings together people who would rarely meet elsewhere, from older couples and lifelong naturists to first-time visitors, swingers and people experimenting with a more liberated version of themselves, the average age being somewhere around 50.

Sitting at a café, you can watch people move between ordinary holiday routines and flamboyant evening performances, often with a confidence that seems to grow as the day goes on. 

I recall on a previous visit I invited a friend, a 6’4” tall Yorkshireman, aged 55, to accompany me to the village for a weekend break.

Having never tried naturism before, he was taken aback when I asked him to strip off on entrance to the village.

By the end of the day, he was fully committed to the lifestyle and announced the trip as the most fun he’d ever had. 

That is part of the appeal of people-watching at Cap d’Agde. You see how quickly people can move beyond the roles and appearances they occupy in everyday life. 

When I feel more daring, I walk to the far end of the 1.5km beach, where some adults have sex outdoors.

There are usually more spectators than participants, visible from up to a quarter of a mile away by the circles they form, sometimes five or six men deep.

Further along are separate areas for gay men and families who regard naturism as a way of life. 

For first-timers, the resort is best approached with an open mind and a clear understanding of its rules.

Daylight hours are generally devoted to ordinary holiday pleasures – swimming, sunbathing, shopping and eating – while the atmosphere becomes more sexually charged later in the day.

Naturism is expected, but consent, privacy and respect remain essential. 

If you can accept the mix of families, traditional naturists and adult entertainment, Cap d’Agde Naturist Village offers a holiday unlike almost anywhere else: part French seaside escape, part social experiment and part unabashed spectacle.

Suzanne Noble is the host of Sex Advice for Seniors, a ‘stigma-free’ sex advice podcast for people who refuse to let age define their desires.

MORE: Forget the Dolomites – I found Europe’s wildest mountain escape with £1 beers and barely any tourists

MORE: I’ve been to 28 countries in Europe, and found its most underrated beach escape

MORE: Ireland’s best hotel for book lovers has Dublin’s finest bookshops on its doorstep

There is more between Nicola Mitchell (Laura Doddington) and brother-in-law Ned Roper than mets the eye, with EastEnders newcomer Jamie Bamber confirming an ‘unspoken’ secret.

Ned makes his long-awaited Albert Square debut on Monday (August 31), arriving in Walford with mum-in-law Rose Hawkins (Marian McLoughlin), much to the chagrin of Nicola.

Nicola, as viewers know, received a visit from sisters Gemma (Patricia Potter) and Jodie (Anna Constable) earlier in the month, which led to estranged mum Rose showing up too.

There is no love lost between Rose and Nicola, who have a fractured relationship due to things that happened in the past.

When Gemma arrives on her doorstep on Monday, Nicola agrees to let her, Jodie and nephew Ryder (Felix Uff) stay – but only on the condition that Rose doesn’t come along too.

Gemma agrees to such terms but when her husband Ned shows up with Rose in tow, it leaves Nicola irate.

‘Ned is somebody who appears very put together,’ said actor Jamie, describing his Albert Square alter-ego ahead of his debut scenes.

‘He dresses well and is naturally charming and confident. He’s enjoyed a great deal of success in life, but when we meet him, everything has fallen apart and he’s having to start again.’

The actor, known for his roles in Battlestar Galactica and Law and Order: UK, admitted that Ned is someone who places a ‘great deal of importance’ on appearances – but that we might soon see another side to him.

‘Often, when someone works that hard to keep up appearances, it’s because there’s more going on beneath the surface,’ he teased.

‘There’s a real depth to him, and as the weeks go on, we’ll start to peel back those layers and discover that Ned is a far more complex character than he first appears.’

Ned’s dynamic with Nicola will also be one of interest, with Jamie confirming that there is something ‘unspoken’ there.

‘It’s clear that Ned and Nicola know each other extremely well, but there’s also something unspoken between them,’ he added. ‘There’s a fascinating push-and-pull dynamic at play.

‘You get the sense that there’s something that binds them together just as strongly as something keeps them apart. There are secrets and a history that neither of them is willing to talk about openly. Over time, viewers will discover exactly what lies behind that complicated relationship.’

Viewers will recall that when Teddy (Roland Manookian) called Nicola from prison on the anniversary of her dad’s death, he was intrigued to discover that the Hawkins’ had landed in Walford, taking particular interest in knowing if Ned was there.

The question is: why? And is his interest in Ned related to this unspoken secret shared between he and Nic? We’ll just have to wait and see!

On the subject of joining EastEnders, Jamie couldn’t be happier.

‘I’ve seldom worked in an environment where people seem so happy, relaxed and comfortable,’ he enthused. ‘Everyone has been incredibly supportive and welcoming, which has made settling in so much easier.’

EastEnders airs Mondays to Thursdays at 7:30pm on BBC One or stream from 6am on BBC iPlayer.

If you’ve got a soap or TV story, video or pictures get in touch by emailing us soaps@metro.co.uk – we’d love to hear from you.

Join the community by leaving a comment below and stay updated on all things soaps on our homepage.

MORE: The Hawkins in EastEnders have a surprise connection to someone else in Walford

MORE: What happens next in EastEnders as Craig is caught out? Spoilers for next week confirmed

MORE: EastEnders’ Laura Doddington is not ruling out a Nicola and Eve romance

Though Chelsea were penalised momentarily under the new Time-Limited Substitution Protocol for Welbeck’s slow exit, this was a fast start. Alonso will hope he can build some momentum now and keep it up. Welbeck, himself, will simply hope for a chance to impress against his former team, whether the game has been won already by his friend Joao Pedro or whether Chelsea are in need of a goal. He had a a very enviable scoring record for Brighton against Chelsea.

A pharmacist has issued an alert over the “hidden dangers” of taking this specific tablet ahead of a flight citing serious health risks, including blood clots and worsened jet lag

Advertisement

When travelling on holiday, passengers might have their own in-flight routine whether it’s a short or long-haul trip. But before you board the gate, there are many steps to follow, like checking your passport and ensuring your bags meet the requirements.

But anyone who takes certain tablets before a flight have been cautioned of the “hidden dangers” as it could lead to serious health complications. While some people prefer to take a sleeping tablet before climbing 35,000 feet in the air, those with forthcoming travel arrangements are being strongly urged to steer clear of it.

There are numerous methods to drift off on a plane, but avoiding medicinal sleep aids is invariably the more sensible option. Alternatively, you might want to try this clever technique, which reportedly helps people sleep better on a plane.

Pharmacist Seema Khatri, from Roseway Labs, which boasts thousands of Instagram followers, said: “People imagine that taking a sleeping pill means they’ll wake up refreshed at their destination. But drug-induced sleep is not the same as natural, restorative sleep, and on a plane it can actually leave you groggier and more jet-lagged.”

One of the principal concerns is circulation, as the expert highlighted: “When you’re sedated you move far less, and that immobility can increase the risk of deep vein thrombosis. Cabins are already dehydrating environments, and sedatives can thicken the blood further, so the two combined aren’t a good mix.”

Advertisement

Cabin pressure can dramatically amplify the impact of sleeping tablets. At increased altitudes, oxygen levels decline and, according to Seema, sedatives may worsen drowsiness, disorientation or even respiratory issues as a result.

“So what might feel like a mild dose on the ground can hit much harder once you’re in the air,” she highlighted. Despite numerous passengers using sleeping pills to counter jet lag, it frequently proves counterproductive.

Seema explained: “If you take at the wrong time, your body clock becomes even more confused. Instead of easing into the new time zone, you land disoriented and wired.

“Older travellers, people with breathing conditions like asthma or sleep apnoea, and anyone with circulation problems should steer well clear of sedatives on planes. Even a small dose can hit them harder at altitude and, in some cases, it can become dangerous rather than just uncomfortable.”

How can I rest when flying?

Instead of relying on pharmaceuticals, sleep-promoting supplements could be a more sensible option for passengers. There are numerous strategies that can be explored following medical consultation.

“We also recommend magnesium glycinate to calm the nervous system, or herbal teas such as chamomile or lemon balm if you just want to relax,” Seema advised. “It’s also important to stay well hydrated, as dehydration can make it harder to rest and can worsen jet lag.”

Straightforward travel tips – such as wearing an eye mask, using noise-cancelling headphones and avoiding caffeine before departure – can prove remarkably effective.

“These options won’t put you into an unnatural sleep cycle, so you arrive fresher and safer,” she added.

While sleeping tablets might appear to be a convenient solution for long-distance flights, specialists caution they could result in grogginess, dehydration and increased health risks. Seema explained: “A sleeping pill before take-off may knock you out, but it won’t give your body the restorative rest it really needs.”

There’s no requirement to struggle with sleep but, if you’re experiencing difficulties, ensure you consult a medical professional for guidance. Your GP will be able to assist with any sleep problems you’re encountering.