The nineties didn’t have streaming, so if you wanted to watch your favorite show, you had to actually be home at eight o’clock on a Thursday or you just missed it, no rewatching until reruns came around months later. That kind of pressure made a hit show feel like an actual event every single week.

These eight are the ones people still bring up unprompted, the shows you can recite half the dialogue from without trying. Some are just plain stupid fun, some snuck in more heart than you’d expect from a network sitcom, but every one of them can still get a room laughing if you put it on today. Let’s dig in.

8

‘Boy Meets World’ (1993–2000)

Image via ABC

This show basically grew up in real time with its own cast, Cory (Ben Savage) starts out as an awkward middle schooler and ends the series married to Topanga (Danielle Fishel) and about to graduate college, and you watched every year of that happen along with him. Feeny (William Daniels), his neighbor and then his teacher for basically his entire education, keeps showing up at every major turning point in Cory’s life without it ever feeling forced.

Shawn (Rider Strong) gets some pretty rough storylines for a kids’ show, an absent dad, real poverty, and the show never makes it an afterschool special about it either, it just lets him be a messed up kid trying his best. The finale ends on Feeny saying “class dismissed” one last time, and if you grew up watching this, that line still gets you a little.

7

‘The Fresh Prince of Bel-Air’ (1990–1996)

Image via NBC

Will Smith basically plays a version of himself getting sent to live with rich relatives in Bel-Air, and most episodes are just goofy fish-out-of-water comedy, Carlton’s (Alfonso Ribeiro) dance alone got referenced everywhere for decades after the show ended. Uncle Phil (James Avery) starts out as the stiff, wealthy uncle Will can’t stand, and slowly becomes the father figure Will actually needed the whole time.

Then every once in a while the show just drops a properly heavy episode on you out of nowhere, the one where Will’s actual dad shows up, promises to stay, and leaves again, and Will breaks down asking why his own father doesn’t want him. It’s one scene, and it’s still one of the best pieces of acting from a sitcom actor, period.

6

‘Frasier’ (1993–2004)

Image via NBC

Frasier (Kelsey Grammer) is a snobby radio psychiatrist living with his blue-collar dad, Martin (John Mahoney), who has zero patience for Frasier’s opera tickets and expensive furniture, and that culture clash carries half the show’s jokes. Niles (David Hyde Pierce), Frasier’s equally snobby brother, spends something like seven years pining after Daphne (Jane Leeves), the physical therapist living in the house, without ever telling her.

Some episodes turn into full-on door-slamming farce, people hiding in closets, mistaken identities, everyone talking past each other, and the show times all of it like a stage play instead of a normal sitcom. It’s smarter than most comedies from that decade without ever feeling like it’s showing off.

5

‘Home Improvement’ (1991–1999)

Image via ABC

Advertisement

Tim Taylor (Tim Allen) hosts a local TV show about tools and home repair, and manages to injure himself or blow something up on basically every single episode of it, which was apparently based on Tim Allen’s actual stand-up act before the show existed.

His neighbor Wilson (Earl Hindman) gives him advice over the fence every episode, and the show never once lets you see his full face, just his eyes over the top of the fence for the entire run. It’s a simple, dumb, comfortable TV, and there’s nothing wrong with that.

4

‘The X-Files’ (1993–2002)

Image via FOX

Advertisement

Mulder (David Duchovny) believes in aliens, Scully (Gillian Anderson) is the scientist assigned to prove him wrong, and the show takes almost nine years going back and forth between two totally different types of episodes, one week it’s a government alien conspiracy, the next week it’s just a creepy story about a guy who eats livers.

That mix is honestly what makes it fun to watch now, you can skip the really dense mythology episodes entirely and still get a great, self-contained horror story almost every week. Duchovny and Anderson’s chemistry keeps the show going even in the weaker seasons, and the whole thing basically predicted the entire modern conspiracy-thriller genre before it existed.

3

‘Seinfeld’ (1989–1998)

Image via NBC

Advertisement

This show is famous for being about nothing, and that’s actually true, most episodes are just Jerry, George (Jason Alexander), Elaine (Julia Louis-Dreyfus), and Kramer (Michael Richards) getting annoyed about parking spots or soup or a marble rye. That turned into one of the most quoted shows ever made anyway.

Kramer bursting through Jerry’s apartment door is one of the most recognizable entrances in TV history, and the show’s structure, four separate storylines that all crash into each other by the end of the episode, got copied by basically every sitcom that came after it. The finale is still controversial to this day, but nothing about the ninety-nine episodes before it needed defending.

2

‘The Simpsons’ (1989– )

Image via Fox

Advertisement

The nineties run of this show is what people actually mean when they say golden-era Simpsons, before the jokes got faster than the plots and the family started feeling more like caricatures of themselves. Homer accidentally becoming an astronaut, Bart selling his soul for five bucks, the show could go anywhere in a single episode and it worked almost every time.

Matt Groening built a show that could be a dumb cartoon for kids on Sunday night and also sneak in pretty sharp satire about American life for the adults watching with them. Decades later, it’s still the longest-running scripted show on American television, and the nineties seasons are the reason people still care.

1

‘Friends’ (1994–2004)

Image via NBC

Advertisement

Six friends hang out at the same coffee shop for ten years, and that’s still one of the most rewatched premises in TV history, decades after it ended. Rachel (Jennifer Aniston), Monica (Courteney Cox), Phoebe (Lisa Kudrow), Joey (Matt LeBlanc), Chandler (Matthew Perry), and Ross (David Schwimmer) all get roughly equal screen time, which is rare for a cast this big.

Rachel’s haircut alone got copied by half the country at the time, and Chandler’s specific way of making a joke out of every uncomfortable moment basically became its own style of humor people still do today without realizing where it came from. It’s comfort TV in the purest sense, you can put on literally any random episode and just relax into it.

Advertisement

Friends

Advertisement

Release Date

1994 – 2004-00-00

Advertisement

Showrunner

Marta Kauffman

Directors

Advertisement

Kevin S. Bright, Gary Halvorson, Michael Lembeck, James Burrows, Gail Mancuso, Peter Bonerz, David Schwimmer, Robby Benson, Shelley Jensen, Terry Hughes, Dana De Vally Piazza, Alan Myerson, Pamela Fryman, Steve Zuckerman, Thomas Schlamme, Roger Christiansen, Sheldon Epps, Arlene Sanford, David Steinberg, Joe Regalbuto, Mary Kay Place, Paul Lazarus, Sam Simon, Todd Holland

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

One Day at a Time alum Mackenzie Phillips had a rocky relationship with one of her castmates on the 1970s sitcom.

“Richard Masur wasn’t very nice,” Phillips, 66, told former costar Valerie Bertinelli on the Monday, September 7, episode of her “Getting Naked” podcast.

Phillips and Bertinelli, 66, starred in One Day at a Time as the teenage daughters of Ann Romano-Royer (Bonnie Franklin), who must adapt to single motherhood following her divorce. Masur, 77, played David Kane, Ann’s divorce lawyer-turned-fiancé. He left the show after the characters’ season 1 split.

Despite not initially getting along with Masur, Phillips said she and her former costar later “made peace.”

“I saw him and he said, ‘I don’t even remember what it was. I don’t even remember what I said, but whatever I said, I’m really sorry. And I’ve always thought you were so incredibly talented and we were all so young,’” she recalled.

One Day at a Time, developed by legendary producer Norman Lear, aired for nine seasons on CBS from 1975 to 1984. The series spawned a 2017 remake developed by Gloria Calderon Kellett and Mike Royce. The Netflix show starred Justina Machado, Rita Moreno, Stephen Tobolowsky, Isabella Gomez, Marcel Ruiz and Todd Grinnell.

During Monday’s podcast episode, Bertinelli recalled her own fears about working with Lear, who wrote and produced other hit shows including All in the Family, Sanford and Son and The Jeffersons before his December 2023 death at age 101.

“I always was in awe of him and afraid of him a little bit, always afraid I was going to be reprimanded by Norman,” she said, adding that Lear was “so loving.”

Thank You!

You have successfully subscribed.

“Both of us are incredibly lucky to have such a mentor, and someone who wasn’t what you think Hollywood is, because young girls in Hollywood are eaten up and [spit] out, and we were not, under Norman’s tutelage,” Bertinelli shared. “I felt very, very protected and I always was in awe of him and afraid of him a little bit.”

The Hot in Cleveland alum recalled Lear’s help during a particularly difficult moment when she struggled to make herself cry in the season 1 finale of One Day at a Time.

“He was the one that took me aside when I had to cry in the finale of the first season,” she shared. “And I couldn’t do it. I was too embarrassed because I wasn’t an actor. I was just learning how to do this. Now I can, but I’ve also have 50 years experience behind me.”

Sometimes, shows are canceled for the most absurd reasons and at the most heartbreaking times, leaving fans crusading for their renewal or stuck with unexplained cliffhangers. While some cancellations make sense, whether because of low viewership, high costs, or unexpected circumstances, one of the most jarring reasons a show was reportedly brought to the guillotine happened in 2010 with a live-action Cartoon Network series. With its mysterious boarding school, gifted young students, hidden rules, and an institution that clearly knows more than it lets on, Tower Prep had all the makings of a darker, more conspiratorial Harry Potter-style adventure.

Axed after just 13 episodes, the reasons stemming from viewership were disappointing, yet understandable. However, the show’s creator, Paul Dini, would later be interviewed on a podcast called “Fatman on Batman,” hosted by Kevin Smith, in which he provided another outrageous explanation for why the show was canceled, suggesting it wasn’t simply because it failed to connect with audiences but because it connected with the “wrong” one: young women.

What Is ‘Tower Prep’ About?

The single season revolves around an elusive preparatory school that scouts specially gifted students and discreetly brings them into its fold, apparently with their parents’ permission. The catch is, no one is allowed to leave. Ian (Drew Van Acker) is at the center of the series, as he groggily wakes up at the school and tries to figure out what is going on. His “special gift” is called “pre-flex,” which allows him to sense actions or events mere seconds before they happen.

As the series continues, he creates a close-knit group of friends who are investigating the mysterious location and have special abilities, including an affinity for persuasion (Ryan Pinkston), an ability to replicate things like vocal mimicry (Dyana Liu), and an instinctive expertise in facial micro-expressions (Elise Gatien). Inching closer to the dark truth of the place, Tower Prep‘s first and final season ends on a jaw-dropping cliffhanger that we will likely never get closure for.

Why Did Cartoon Network Cancel ‘Tower Prep’?

Image via Cartoon Network

A year after Tower Prep‘s inconclusive Season 1 finale aired, Cartoon Network released the TV schedule for renewed seasons, and Tower Prep was unfortunately not on this list. Dini explained the cancellation in a post on his blog via LiveJournal, where he attributed it to Cartoon Network’s shift away from live-action shows to animated ones. “Their biggest hits now are animated comedy shows,” he said. “And they most likely will continue to concentrate on producing them for the near future.” In the comment section, he further explained that five months before the live-action show even debuted, “they decided they wanted to be a cartoon exclusive network after all. The decision was made then and there to kill live drama.” It doesn’t seem like Tower Prep had much of a chance anyway.

On top of this, Dini also cited the series’ initial reception as a reason for its cancellation. “It cost a lot of money to produce and did not immediately deliver the big ratings smash they wanted; they yanked it.” However, he further argued: “Ironically, now that fans all over the world have seen Tower, and many more have watched via download, the ratings for first-run broadcast would arguably be much better, but CN remains resolute in their decision not to order new episodes.” So, even though Tower Prep grew a dedicated fanbase, it wasn’t built quickly enough for the network to justify its renewal.

There was a subsequent fight for the show’s survival. In the blog post, Dini recommended sending handwritten letters to the network to convince executives of the show’s popularity, and on X, he even provided links to online petitions. But it was going to be an uphill battle, as Dini described Cartoon Network as a company that was “not known for paying much attention to fan protests,” which is ultimately what happened. The story of Tower Prep was lost in network limbo, but this wouldn’t be the last time we heard of it. Dini was invited to a podcast in 2013, where he alleged another reason Tower Prep was canceled — one that could be considered among the most outrageous in TV history.

Paul Dini Reveals Another Reason ‘Tower Prep’ Got the Axe

Image via Cartoon Network

Image via Cartoon Network

Image via Cartoon Network

On the podcast, Dini’s comments about why Tower Prep was canceled are jarring to say the least, claiming that it was the show’s predominantly female viewership that caused it to be quietly benched after 13 episodes. He said he had heard executives at the network explicitly say, “We do not want girls watching this show.” And why? “They. Do. Not. Buy. Toys. The girls buy different toys.” It sounds so ridiculous, you can hardly believe someone would say this. While there hasn’t been much research that specifically ventures into who buys more toys, generally, children tend to gravitate towards gendered toys aligning with their own, though many papers have questioned the role of social conditioning in this. Either way, as Dini and Smith go on to discuss, just do your research and make different toys or products.

Dini expanded on his experience working on the show. “‘We need boys, but we need girls right there, right one step behind the boys’ — this is the network talking — ‘one step behind the boys, not as smart as the boys, not as interesting as the boys, but right there.’” However, Dini recounted that during pre-production, the female characters, namely CJ and Suki, ended up with nuanced backstories and characterizations that drew female viewers in, becoming an integral part of their audience. Dini described the network’s response to this as: “We’ve got too many girls. We need more boys… Boys, boys, boys. Boys buy the little spinny tops; they buy the action figures. Girls buy princesses. We’re not selling princesses.”

Cartoon Network’s boy-centric brand allegedly became the downfall of Tower Prep, where female viewership and connection weren’t celebrated but treated as a problem. Between all the reasons that have been publicized for Tower Prep‘s cancellation, it seems the show was always on shaky ground, never really finding firm footing to thrive as it should have.

In his blog, Dini also noted that Cartoon Network refused to sell the rights to the show. More than 15 years after its premiere, a revival now appears increasingly unlikely; Dini himself has continued to temper expectations about the series ever returning. But with the downfall of Tower Prep also came one of the most infuriating reasons to cancel a show: its audience may have loved it, but according to its creator, too many of those viewers simply weren’t the ones the network wanted. With HBO’s new Harry Potter series arriving this Christmas, Tower Prep feels especially ripe for rediscovery.

Tower Prep is currently available to purchase digitally through the Apple TV Store.

Advertisement

Advertisement

Release Date

2010 – 2010-00-00

Advertisement

Network

Cartoon Network

Advertisement

• 

  Drew Van Acker

  Advertisement

  Ian Archer

• 

  Ryan Pinkston

  Gabe Forrest

  Advertisement
• 
• 

Advertisement

Advertisement

Jennifer Aniston’s boyfriend, Jim Curtis, is opening up about the beginning stages of the pair’s budding romance.

“There was a many-month friendship first,” the hypnotist, 50, told The Times in an interview published on Saturday, September 12. “The drive was more natural, more organic, less needy. In the past I’ve felt this idea of, ‘I need you to be in love with me…’ I wasn’t searching for love anymore.”

The self-help guru added, “And what do I feel now? I feel real joy, real presence, real calmness, real partnership.”

While Curtis’ relationship with the Friends star, 50, wasn’t forced, he told the outlet he had a premonition on his 47th birthday that by the time he turned half-a-century old he would be “with someone unlike I had ever been in a relationship with.” After he turned 49, Aniston — a yoga fan who participates in “goddess circles” in which women can freely and without judgement or shame share their stories — followed the “transformational coach” on Instagram, going on to like several of his videos.

Related: Inside Jennifer Aniston’s ‘Serious’ Romance With New BF Jim Curtis

When Jennifer Aniston touched down in Mallorca, Spain, over the 4th of July weekend, it seemed like just another holiday was on the horizon for the Friends alum. Shielding herself from the blazing sun in a wide-brim hat and dark shades, Aniston, casually dressed in a black tank top and jeans, stepped out with her […]

The pair were later introduced by a mutual friend, and by July 4th 2026 — after Curtis was photographed rubbing Aniston’s shoulders on a yacht off the coast of Mallorca — a source confirmed to Us they were officially a couple.

“They are being super private but have been spending a lot of time together,” an insider told Us at the time. “They are happy and really into each other.”

Aniston later opened up about her new beau in an interview with Elle, gushing about Curtis’ many talents.

“Hypnotism is one of the many things that he does,” Aniston said during her November 2025 Elle Women of the Year cover story, adding that Curtis is both “very special” and yet “very” normal. “He’s quite extraordinary, and helps many, many people.“

Thank You!

You have successfully subscribed.

Advertisement

Related: Jim Curtis Says Jennifer Aniston Romance Is Still in ‘Honeymoon Phase’

Jim Curtis is shedding light on his relationship with girlfriend Jennifer Aniston. “We do a lot of meditation,” Curtis, 50, shared on the Monday, August 31, episode of the “The Jamie Kern Lima Show” about his and Aniston’s romance. “We do a lot of talk.” The hypnotist went on to explain that there are “different […]

The actress continued at the time, “[He] wants to help people heal, move through their trauma and stagnation into clarity. It’s a beautiful thing to commit your life to.”

Being romantically linked to Aniston — who was was previously married to Brad Pitt before their 2005 split and Justin Theroux until their divorce in 2018 — has only elevated Curtis’ social and cultural status. According to The Times, his Instagram followers have doubled to 1.1 million since the pair went public with their romantic relationship.

“I was sitting on a couch recently,” the wellness expert writes in his new book, The Book of Possibility: Release. Align. Become., per the outlet. “Which sounds normal enough until I tell you that I was sitting between Jerry Seinfeld and Larry David.”

Editor’s note: The following contains major spoilers for The Walking Dead: Dead City Season 3.

Everything that’s been building over the course of Season 3 of the AMC series The Walking Dead: Dead City came to a head in the finale, entitled “Tenebrae.” Maggie (Lauren Cohan) finally came to terms with just how much a part of her life Negan (Jeffrey Dean Morgan) really is, and she decided to step into the leadership role that he had been pushing for all along. She also decided to trust that Hershel (Logan Kim) could hold his own and supported his involvement in their plan to take their new community back from those trying to take it and Negan down. Now, it will be interesting to see how this new dynamic evolves moving forward and what this civilization could become next.

Collider recently got the opportunity to chat with Cohan about how this felt like “a season of firsts” for The Walking Dead and how that could affect things moving forward. During the interview, she discussed Maggie’s frame of mind, how all of these characters are broken in their own way, redefining Maggie and Negan’s relationship, why their dynamic reminds her of the one she has with her own brother, finding a balance between being a mother and being a leader, and where things could go next, in a possible Season 4.

Lauren Cohan Says It Was Nice To Give Maggie a Bit of a Break in ‘The Walking Dead: Dead City’ Season 3

“This is such a season of firsts in our universe.”

Image via AMC

COLLIDER: Having karaoke with a stripper pole in a bar is not a moment that you often get in The Walking Dead. What was it like to figure out who Maggie is when she just cuts loose and doesn’t have the weight of absolutely everything on her shoulders all at once?

LAUREN COHAN: I feel like this is such a season of firsts in our universe. And not just Dead City, but The Walking Dead as a whole. It was amazing. It was funny because Maggie being tipsy, just on an actor level, when you’re with people who you know and you’re familiar with, it’s definitely easier to do that because you can imagine being merry with them. That part feels like, “Okay, cool, so now all I have to remember is, in some sense, this is more of a friendship with Jeff [Dean Morgan] than a Maggie dynamic with Negan.”

The episode leads up to a point where there’s a lot of relief for the group and they’ve taken a risk and it’s paid off, and it’s a whole new frame of mind for her. The only way through now is to do something different, and that applies across the board. When we did that episode, what made it so much fun was watching Jimmi [Simpson] and Aimee [Garcia] sing karaoke naturally makes you feel really relaxed and drunk-happy. There were definitely a lot of elements of uncharted territory, but also genuine fun in the episode and in a lot of moments during the season.

The tension that Maggie has had for so long became these exercises for me. The tension of needing to see things a certain way or needing to keep rigid or keep your horse blinders on, or keep safe and keep people safe, or maintain a point of view, if you just remove that one thing, it’s the equivalent of suddenly being on the beach for a normal person. It was so fun for us to do it. We had so many moments like that this season.

Maggie and Negan Are Both Just Doing the Best That They Can in ‘The Walking Dead: Dead City’

“I really believe, in life and in the show, that people are in your life for a reason.”

There’s the moment in the finale when Maggie says to Negan, “You’ve got me. We’re forever connected. We’re chained to one another.” She’s never going to forgive him, but they’ve moved past it. Is she the only one who can humanize him in that way?

COHAN: People feel really connected to Negan in a lot of ways, and that’s testament to Jeff’s charisma and warmth and the relatability of Negan. He does these abhorrent things. He does less of them now, obviously. There’s just something relatable, even in his reactivity and how he traipses through life and what a broken person he is. Everybody that’s left is broken and is a patchwork of coping mechanisms. I hope they never change. Everybody is a total Tin Man. To answer that question now, to me, almost tries to get ahead of the way I might be able to say it when all of The Walking Dead is over, and I look back in five years at what it meant.

I really believe, in life and in the show, that people are in your life for a reason, and you either continue to face the challenges that they bring up for you, or you say, “Thank you,” you move on, and you realize that it was a moment, or you kill them. There’s a million times when I’ve looked at it like, “She should have just killed him. When Rick stopped her, she should have pushed him out of the way and gone for it.” I always feel Hershel Sr. is on my shoulder, and I always feel like there’s a dichotomy in Maggie of a cut and dry brutality, trying to learn how to lead people and being a hugely compassionate person.

There are so many moments within the season, and it isn’t completely magnanimous. He sees the good in Maggie and tells her, and I see the brokenness and the good in him and I tell him, and I thank him for how he’s helped. The archetypes of these characters have always been pretty front and center. If you think about what makes someone a hero, what makes someone brave, what makes someone a leader, what makes someone a fighter, and what makes someone just a little bit of some of those things some of the time, but also completely screwed up and fumbling through and not knowing what you’re doing, it’s a giant metaphor for parenting. Everybody’s just doing the best they can with the information that they have at the time. It’s the friction that comes from them both being around and both being in each other’s orbit that’s fascinating to me.

It’s especially interesting this season because they’ve formed more of a partnership now. Throughout the season, she resisted being a leader, and it seems like finding a partnership is what allows her to be able to step into that leadership position. She hands him that badge and says she wants him to lead security while she’s in charge. Why do you think Negan saw her as a leader before she saw it in herself, and what do you think it is that really helped her finally see it?

COHAN: When I think about that scene, or I think about the season, I feel how much he wants her forgiveness and how much he wants to help her and how much he cares for her, which is very natural. If you take away the main part of their history, I do think it’s like brother and sister. People ‘ship Negan and Maggie so hard, but if I think about my relationship with my own brother, I give him shit, but I know what he’s capable of. You just have these little quirks, and there’s certain people in the world who can lovingly call them out and make fun of them but also know that you’re a fucking badass. I feel like that’s how Negan is to Maggie.

To survive in this world, there are so many things, and not just in this world [of the show]. I really think you can get lost in the past or lost in resentment in life, and it’s like, “Am I going to, or am I going to find the best way to move forward?” What begins as, “I cannot forget this thing and I hate you, and I see everything you do through this lens” becomes, “You are synonymous with this thing, but I haven’t killed you and I’m not going to kill you” to, “Yes, this thing happened, but I’m focusing on something else right now. I’m choosing to focus on this” to, “If people can change in a lifetime — and The Walking Dead, because of all the shit they go through, is somehow many, many lifetimes — then maybe they can change monumentally in this one.”

The leadership thing came about in an interesting way because I got fatigued by giving people these monikers. With Maggie, I don’t want it to just be, “Leader, mother, warrior.” What it led to in the season was a real working mother deciding if she can hold down a CEO job and still raise her kids. We wanted to put that inside the apocalypse, but not quite so literally as that. What permission do you need to give yourself to fulfill your own potential and still be there for your kids? The thing that I think allows it to happen this season is Hershel saying to Maggie at the beginning of the season, “I remember all the times you were there.” And then, we see the mentorship through Luis. We see that he doesn’t want her to hurt anymore, and he’s okay with her allowing Negan to be a part of this new world that they’re building and sees the strengths in him and wants to be a part of this community.

She’s been so afraid to open up to the idea of these possibilities, as well as being with a new community and potentially failing again and losing people again. But I think she realizes that she did okay by her son. He is equipped to jump in and come on the ride. But it’s more than that. It’s never literal. It’s never just, “I’m going to literally just stare at and be with my child.” It’s more like, “Will I have the bandwidth?” It’s like teaching. If you can, you should.

In ‘The Walking Dead: Dead City’ Season 3, Maggie Has Realized That Negan Is Family, for Better or Worse

“Our skill sets complement each other.”

Image via AMC

What do you think this new partnership between Maggie and Negan will be like? How do you see this new dynamic working out between them?

COHAN: It’s funny, it goes back to the sibling thing. What’s been realized, without necessarily being explicitly said, is that our skill sets complement each other. That, for me, comes down to recognizing and encouraging him. Within the season, there’s the light versus the fight. But when it comes down to it and I say to him, “You’re the only one that understands the brutality that it really does take,” it’s not all sunshine and roses. It’s never going to be. Whether Maggie realizes it or not, there is this subconscious recognition that when the shit comes down, she can rely on him to do the thing that will keep people safe, which is his greatest pride, ironically, and his excuse for some of the insane things that he did. If you asked him, he would say that it was to protect his people. Maggie will never believe that. However, with the Negan that is now, she does believe that it’s possible.

I think the most important thing that will influence them moving forward is that it’s like being family. They may not like each other all the time. She may still want to kill him sometimes. She may still find him insufferable. He may find her insufferable and stubborn. But Maggie and Negan have known each other the longest of anyone that we know that’s still living. Rick and Michonne, and Daryl and Carol, and Eugene — these people are still alive, but we don’t know where they are. Maggie and Negan have known each other longer than she’s had her kid. They’ve been through the fire together, even if it has been inflicted by one or the other. From that basis, they will go into uncharted territory, in terms of building something new. I really think this could be the beginning of a huge, robust civilization, ironically born from the ashes of how they met.

The Walking Dead: Dead City airs on AMC.

Advertisement

Release Date

Advertisement

June 15, 2023

Network

AMC

Advertisement

Showrunner

Eli Jorne, Seth Hoffman

Directors

Advertisement

Kevin Dowling, Loren Yaconelli

Writers

Brenna Kouf

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Justin Bieber and Hailey Bieber are seemingly marking their eighth wedding anniversary with a friendly game of pool.

“8 years until infinity ❤️ NEW BEGINNINGS ♾️,” Justin, 32, wrote via Instagram on Sunday, September 13, sharing a handful of images of himself playing a round of the beloved bar game with his wife, 29. “I love you baby Happy Anniversary 😘.”

Hailey replied in the comments section, writing, “8 years of me being horrendous at playing pool 😍😍.”

The Rhode founder reposted Justin’s PDA-filled roundup to her Instagram Stories, along with the caption, “🙈 🤍.”

The “Peaches” singer and Hailey have been married since September 2018, later welcoming son Jack Blues in August 2024. (Jack turned 2 late last month, which the couple commemorated with an intimate pancake breakfast.)

“It’s total bliss for the two of them,” a source exclusively told Us after Hailey gave birth. “Hailey is enjoying and savoring these moments being a new mom. She is over the moon and in [the] mom zone, and completely focused on the health of the baby.”

The insider further noted that Justin was a “very hands-on” father to Jack.

While raising their son, Justin and Hailey also learned new truths about their marriage.

“We’re just taking it a day at a time,” Hailey told GQ in a November 2025 profile. “We both feel very protective of our son and I don’t think that’s ever going to change, but our life is our life and it is really public, so I think we’re just going to cross every bridge that we need to when we get there. But as of right now, I feel really comfortable about the way we are sharing things and not sharing things.”

At the time, Hailey hinted whether she and the Grammy nominee had plans to expand their family of three.

Thank You!

You have successfully subscribed.

Advertisement

Related: How Justin and Hailey Bieber Celebrated Son Jack’s 2nd Birthday

Justin and Hailey Bieber’s son, Jack Blues, is officially out of the baby stage after turning 2 on Saturday, August 22. Taking to her Instagram Stories, Hailey, 29, offered a glimpse of the family of three’s festivities. “2 ❤️,” the Rhode founder captioned a pic of a plate full of pancakes topped with swirls upon […]

“I don’t think there’s anything someone can tell you about it that will ever, ever, ever prepare you until you do it yourself,” she told the outlet. “But I feel much more prepared to do it again, as opposed to how not prepared I felt doing it for the first time. And I think for me personally, there’s so much unknown to it, but so much happens and so much changes and you evolve in a totally different way that you would never be able to prepare for until you do it.”

As for Justin, he’s equally enjoyed life as a family man. His latest album, Swag, even features sweet shout-outs to both Hailey and Jack.

“Hailey, babe, hallelujah,” Justin sings in the chorus of “Everything Hallelujah” off the record. “Baby Jack, hallelujah.”

Editor’s note: The following contains major spoilers for The Walking Dead: Dead City Season 3.

The Walking Dead franchise kicked off on AMC in 2010, and after 11 seasons and a variety of spin-offs, it’s still going strong, 16 years later. But that doesn’t mean the cast and showrunner of Dead City didn’t want to shake things up in Season 3, deciding to experiment and take chances with elements that haven’t been explored previously. Whether it was pushing the character dynamics in different directions, showing an alternate reality of life without the apocalypse and walkers, or letting us see what a sitcom in this world would look like, things have definitely felt different this season. One thing that is exactly the same is that Maggie (Lauren Cohan) and Negan (Jeffrey Dean Morgan) are fighting walkers to keep their community safe while human enemies often become an even greater threat to their survival.

After watching the season finale, Collider got the opportunity to chat with new showrunner Seth Hoffman, who previously worked on Seasons 4, 5 and 6 of the mothership series, about his approach to Season 3 of Dead City and how he’d like to continue to experiment moving forward in possible future seasons. During the interview, he discussed doing new things with the series while still making it feel like classic The Walking Dead, his hope to keep doing things that haven’t been seen in the franchise previously, clearly defining Maggie and Negan’s relationship, and how this new partnership between them could play out in Season 4.

‘Dead City’ Wanted To Shake Things Up for Season 3 While Still Feeling Like Classic ‘The Walking Dead’

“The way I solved that puzzle was to go, ‘Okay, let’s bring these characters back to who they were.’”

COLLIDER: When I spoke to both Jeffrey Dean Morgan and Lauren Cohen about this season, they talked about how exciting it was to be trying some new things and experimenting a bit with characters that they thought they couldn’t know any better than they already did. Why did this season feel like the right season to shake things up in that way?

SETH HOFFMAN: I think for a couple of reasons. When I came on, in talking to the network, they wanted to know, “What can we do that’s new?” And some of the producers wanted it to feel like classic The Walking Dead. It was a puzzle. It was about, “Okay, how do I make it feel classic, but also make it feel new?” The way I solved that puzzle was to go, “Okay, let’s bring these characters back to who they were.” Let’s bring back a version of Maggie that is the hopeful, optimistic version of herself that she was in Season 2, 3, and 4 of the mothership. Let’s bring back the version of Negan that is unpredictable and a little bit of a live wire, who the audience fell in love with in Season 7 and 8 before he got thrown in jail and before he got put under the thumb of the Croat and the Dama. Let’s put those versions of those characters back center stage, and those versions of those characters have never interacted with each other. In that way, it can feel like classic The Walking Dead, but by them engaging with one another, it will feel new and fresh. That was the hope for Season 3.

Is that where the alternate reality episode came from, and even just the little snippet of the sitcom that we get at the beginning of the finale?

HOFFMAN: Yeah. It was, “Here are two characters, and they’re going to be driving us through this season. The concept for Episode 6 was less of a micro decision. I want to push this franchise that I love and that I worked on for three years and that is one of the highlights of my entire career in new directions. I want to see what the limits are for what a Walking Dead episode can be. When I came up with the idea for that episode, when I pitched it to the network, it was, “The Walking Dead does stories where people feel dread, and these people are going to feel dread in this episode because they’re going to be worried that Maggie and Negan are going to hook up. It’s a horror romantic comedy.”

I wanted to push the episodes in different directions, so there are all these little micro decisions like, “How far can we push that scene in the top of the finale towards sitcom and make it still feel like The Walking Dead?” In Episode 5, when we’re introducing the characters in The Dead Squad, that isn’t necessarily a cinematic choice that we’ve seen in The Walking Dead before, but can that be part of The Walking Dead’s language? There were lots of ways in which I was trying to push and make it feel fresh and new while also making it feel like The Walking Dead.

Do you still have some ideas for that kind of experimentation for another season? Like how much have you thought about what a Season 4 could be and what more you could do with it?

HOFFMAN: If we’re lucky to get a Season 4, I will continue to push the envelope. People will see things in a Season 4, if we’re lucky enough to get it, that they’ve never seen in The Walking Dead universe, but also, they will feel like The Walking Dead stories.

‘The Walking Dead: Dead City’ Season 3 Clearly Defined Maggie and Negan’s Relationship so They Can Move Forward Together

“In a Season 4, that would be a really exciting dynamic to explore.”

Image via AMC

There’s a moment in the finale that feels like it’s been a long time coming when Maggie says to Negan, “You’ve got me. We’re forever connected. We are outright chained to one another.” She’s never going to forgive him, but they’ve moved past it and they’ve gotten closer. What do you love about that moment between them and about how Maggie humanizes Negan?

HOFFMAN: It was important for us to really clearly define Maggie’s relationship towards Negan. I think Negan’s relationship towards Maggie is pretty clear. He kills for her. He wants to protect her. She is so important to him. Maggie’s feelings towards Negan, for a long time, were very defined by, “I hate you, you killed my husband.” In this season, she has let some of that go. So, where is she? We worked hard to really parse the language in that scene to make it clear that she’s not forgiving him and she will never forgive him. She isn’t happy about the fact that Negan, in some ways, makes her a better person. She probably really hates the fact that Negan makes her a better person, but he does.

That’s where they are right now. She could fight against that and try to move away from him and live her own life. Part of what we were trying to say in Episode 6 is, “If you do part, then maybe you’ll fall into old patterns that aren’t necessarily the best version of yourself. Let’s see what happens if the two of you actually do work together for the greater good.” I think, in a Season 4, that would be a really exciting dynamic to explore.

Airing that out also opens it up for Hershel to work with them as a little trio, which you couldn’t have gotten to if that hadn’t happened.

HOFFMAN: A hundred percent. To think about where the two of them were at the beginning of this season versus where they are at the end of this season, it’s a monumental change. Now that these two characters are where they are, it would be incredibly exciting to explore what their next step would be.

‘The Walking Dead: Dead City’ Season 4 Would See Maggie and Negan Having New Conflicts

“They’ll be in conflict about that.”

Image via AMC

Advertisement

At the end of the finale, Maggie hands that badge to Negan so that he can lead security while she’s in charge. What do you think that new partnership between them could be like? How do you see that dynamic working out?

HOFFMAN: A big thing that we’ve done this season is to give both of them something that they care deeply about. They cared deeply about this community, and they want it to thrive. Everything the Croat said in Episode 1, this city has everything to rebuild society in. Both of them, by the end of the season, have really embraced that. This is home. They’re moving into a working relationship, which they’ve never had before. They have different worldviews, they have different strategies, they have different tactics, and they both want the best for the city, but that doesn’t necessarily mean the same thing. Maggie might think one thing is the best, and Negan might think a different thing would be the best. And so, they’ll be in conflict about that, but their conflict won’t be rooted in the fact that Negan killed Glenn. It’ll be rooted in present-day circumstances, which is something both of them really want. That is where their relationship would live in a Season 4.

The Walking Dead: Dead City airs on AMC.

Advertisement

Advertisement

Release Date

June 15, 2023

Network

Advertisement

AMC

Showrunner

Eli Jorne, Seth Hoffman

Advertisement

Directors

Kevin Dowling, Loren Yaconelli

Advertisement

Writers

Brenna Kouf

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Joey King is addressing claims she underwent plastic surgery to prepare for her appearance at this year’s Met Gala back in May.

“I didn’t get a facelift,” King, 27, told Owen Thiele on the Friday, September 11, episode of his “In Your Dreams” podcast. “I’m glad we’re talking about this. … Just want to let you know, didn’t get work done, didn’t get a facelift.”

The Practical Magic 2 star went on to reveal what she actually did to get ready to walk the steps of the Metropolitan Museum of Art in New York City for the second year in a row.

“What I did do, I got a spray tan,” she recalled. “And then I did a 36-hour fast. No food, nothing but water, which I don’t promote that.”

King explained that she had attended a bachelorette party the weekend before the Met Gala, which resulted in her “looking swollen” because she was “drinking a lot.”

“I looked busted,” she continued. “And I was like, ‘I gotta do a reset. I’m going to do a 24-hour fast, which is good for you to do once a month if you’re healthy enough to do anyway. By the time I woke up and ordered lunch the next day, it wound up being 36 hours and everything.”

In addition to fasting, King said she got a “lymphatic massage” and a facial the day before fashion’s biggest night, followed by another face massage the day of the event.

“We were doing everything we could to look amazing on the carpet, and guess what, it worked because everybody thought I had plastic surgery,” she concluded.

King turned heads at this year’s Met Gala by wearing a sheer Miu Miu gown. She pulled off another stunning sheer look at the Practical Magic 2 premiere in London on August 26, making headlines for her floral gown with yellow Miu Miu undergarments.

King’s casting in Practical Magic 2 as Kylie Owens, the younger daughter of Sandra Bullock’s Sally Owens, has been met with backlash due to the Kissing Booth star replacing Rachel Evan Wood, who played the character in the 1998 original film. (Maisie Williams also replaced Alexandra Artrip as Antonia Owens, Sally’s older daughter.)

Days before Practical Magic 2’s premiere, Wood, 38, threw shade at the cast while praising King.

“I really appreciated Joey King reaching out to me because no one who worked on the original film did. She’s a sweetheart,” she wrote via her Instagram Stories on September 1.

King also told The Hollywood Reporter that she had a “lovely” conversation with Wood in light of the recasting decision.

Thank You!

You have successfully subscribed.

“I just was so appreciative of the support that she showed to me and to the rest of the cast. She is so talented and so beautiful and she made this role so special when she was a young girl,” King said. “I feel so grateful to be able to play Kylie at this age but I love Evan so much and I’m so appreciative of her kind words and the exchange that her and I shared.”

Wood previously claimed in July 2025 that she was not “asked to come back” for the sequel despite offering her “services.” The film’s director, Susanne Bier, told THR that recasting was necessary to create a “certain age group.”

“In the story, they’re just, like, literally out of college, and with Joey and Maisie it just felt completely right,” she explained.

2026 might go down as one of the most successful years for horror movies in some time. While nothing has quite stacked up to the box office might of The Odyssey or Spider-Man: Brand New Day, the genre dominated the conversation heading into the summer with one hit after another. Despite being by far the lowest-rated entry in franchise history, Scream 7 continued the franchise’s run of success by scaring up a $214 million global haul. Yet this was the year lower-budget YouTube creators put Hollywood on notice with original ideas that surpassed expectations and earned rave reviews. It began with Mark “Markiplier” Fischbach‘s adaptation of Iron Lung earning a surprising $51 million during a very limited self-distributed release in January before May rolled around and brought with it A24’s highest-grossing film ever at $394.1 million, Backrooms, directed by Kane Parsons based on his own viral horror series.

For all their accomplishments and the other acclaimed macabre titles released so far, like 28 Years Later: The Bone Temple and Hokum, horror’s best year in a while also has an obvious standout — Obsession. Much has been made of YouTuber and Milk & Serial director Curry Barker‘s breakout hit, from its $512.6 million global box office haul, which makes it one of the most profitable movies ever made against its reported $750,000 budget, to its breakout performances from Michael Johnston and especially Inde Navarrette. The film has become nothing short of a cultural phenomenon, both proving how desirable an original IP from a creator outside Hollywood can be and inserting itself into awards conversations. Now that it’s officially available from home, it’s only continuing to dominate on streaming and VOD.

This week, Obsession pulled off a digital trifecta by reaching #1 on Prime Video, Apple TV, and Google VOD charts. Making the feat more impressive is the fact that it’s also available to stream on Peacock, yet it’s handily outperforming the titles directly behind it on each list, like Steven Spielberg‘s Disclosure Day and Antoine Fuqua‘s billion-dollar biopic, Michael. With spooky season just around the corner, there may only be more momentum coming for Barker’s smash hit as viewers look to catch up on the scariest films of the year. It certainly managed to frighten critics and audiences as it followed Bear (Johnston) experiencing the increasingly dark and horrific consequences of wishing his crush, Nikki (Navarrette) would love him more than anyone in the world.

What’s Next for the Main Stars Behind ‘Obsession’?

All of Obsession‘s key players have wasted no time lining up their next big roles. Before the film even appeared in front of general audiences, Barker was already tapped to write and direct the next Texas Chainsaw Massacre installment under A24, but that’s just the beginning. His next film with regular partner Cooper Tomlinson, Anything But Ghosts, is already shot and dated for 2027, and Universal and Blumhouse also paid through the nose to secure his next horror pitch.

Navarrette, meanwhile, has a date with the MCU, as she was revealed at D23 to be playing the mutant Rogue in Jake Schreier‘s X-Men movie. Her star will also continue to rise in the bonkers sci-fi package, The Waffle House Index, under Apple Original Films, casting her as a Waffle House graveyard shift employee enduring the most disastrous night imaginable. Last but not least, Johnston hasn’t formally been attached to any projects or confirmed anything yet, but reports have indicated he’s in talks to join Brendan Fraser and Rachel Weisz in the new The Mummy movie from Radio Silence.

Obsession is available to stream on Peacock and purchase through digital retailers. Stay tuned here at Collider for more on all the hottest films on streaming throughout the year.

Advertisement

Advertisement

Release Date

May 15, 2026

Runtime

Advertisement

108 minutes

Director

Curry Barker

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

No one can deny that Netflix wields an impressive sci-fi library, but it’s the few out of the many that feel so carefully made that every single episode can stand as something defiantly special. The best of Netflix sci-fi hits do so much more than introduce time travel, strange technology, apocalyptic mysteries, or alien threats; they use those amazing tropes to explore identity, survival, fear, grief, connection, and the choices that genuinely change lives. These few out of the streaming platform’s extensive catalog represent brilliance, with each installment feeling purposeful, even as the quieter scenes that may initially seem a bit redundant ultimately contribute something significant to the larger narrative, characters, or their world.

Iconic gems like the complex sci-fi watch, Dark, which ensures viewers must pay close attention to every single detail within each of its episodes in order to find what is hidden, and the survival thriller, The Eternaut, which transforms what could have been a generic apocalyptic event into a tense story about ordinary people trying to survive a world that has suddenly become unknowable and dangerous, are just two in Netflix’s sci-fi library that host episodes where every one is a true masterpiece. Compiled on this list are five worthy works of science fiction out of Netflix’s impressive catalog that are not just imaginative, but also controlled, unforgettable, and genuinely brilliant from episode to episode.

5

‘The Eternaut’ (2025–Present)

Image via Netflix

The gripping Netflix series The Eternaut definitely belongs on this list of sci-fi shows that wield masterful episodes because, with just six installments, it transforms the end of the world into something horrifyingly personal. Set in Buenos Aires after a deadly snowfall that kills anyone who comes into contact with it, the adapted series follows Juan Salvo (Ricardo Darín) and the people sheltering with him as they quickly realize that survival depends on improvised protective clothing, disciplined cooperation, and isolation; only Juan can’t remain indoors since he desperately needs to find his daughter Clara (Mora Fisz).

The Eternaut can be easily defended as a true masterpiece. Not one of its episodes acts as narrative waste; instead, each captivating chapter pushes survivors further into the mystery while excellently raising the stakes. The Eternaut is definitely a chilling slow-burn with careful progress that doesn’t seem to ever lag, as it uses twists and gradual reveals to deepen its mystery and make the true scale of the threat all the more terrifying. The adapted series is consistently fantastic, with each installment another necessary step into a much larger nightmare. The Eternaut is genuinely able to keep its viewers entertained due to its powerful, high-quality momentum episode after episode, marking it as a well-balanced masterpiece that’s a perfect fit for this list of Netflix’s brilliant sci-fi gems.

4

‘Pluto’ (2023)

Image via Netflix

This series is honestly one of Netflix’s most thoughtful sci-fi shows to ever exist. Set in a technologically advanced future where highly sophisticated robots live alongside human beings and possess families, emotions, occupations, and legal protections, the captivating 2023 anime, Pluto, centers around one of the world’s most advanced robots, Europol investigator Gesicht (Shinshu Fuji), who is assigned to investigate a sequence of murders beginning with the destruction of the beloved Swiss robot, Montblanc (Hiroki Yasumoto).

Out of the five on this list, Pluto is definitely the easiest literal case for an amazing series with absolutely no disposable chapters. The anime takes its time, with even the story’s first episode never rushing forward through its setup of the central mystery. Pluto hosts only installments that truly matter, working as double construction as each one solves or complicates a piece of the case, while also asking a much larger ethical question. Pluto is an animated marvel, but its masterpiece status does not rely on its spectacle alone. In actuality, the series is at its most brilliant in its quieter and more emotional scenes, when it dives deep into war, prejudice, hatred, and what it truly means to be human. Even seemingly small conversations can completely reshape how audiences understand a conflict or character. Across eight memorable episodes, Pluto delivers truly masterful works of fiction, making it a remarkable sci-fi series that is worthwhile.

3

‘Arcane’ (2021–2024)

Image via Netflix

Arcane is a beloved Netflix animated series that is genuinely one of the clearest examples of Netflix’s most masterful shows, that wields episode after episode of high-quality content. The sci-fi drama, set between the shining city of Piltover and the oppressed underground of Zaun, follows Vi (Hailee Steinfeld) and Powder, later known as Jinx (Ella Purnell), who are ripped apart by a childhood tragedy. As the sisters grow up on opposite sides of an escalating conflict, an incredibly smart inventor, known as Jayce Talis (Kevin Alejandro), helps develop the revolutionary technology known as Hextech, all the while tensions thicken between Zaun and Piltover.

Arcane is one of Netflix’s most visually stunning works of fiction. Each one of its episodes changes the characters or their world in a way that directly affects what comes next, making it fantastically tough to pinpoint a single chapter that could be removed without weakening the entire series. Even the show’s much quieter episodes are packed full of political tension, significant character development, and quality details that become increasingly important as the series moves forward. Arcane simply doesn’t just use its installments to move characters toward the next major spectacle; instead, the breathtaking animated series ensures every chapter has a narrative and emotional purpose of its own. It’s one of Netflix’s very best and an easy fit for any list of the platform’s sci-fi shows, where every episode is absolutely masterful.

2

‘Sense8’ (2015–2018)

Image via Netflix

Advertisement

Among some of Netflix’s most ambitious gems is a sci-fi series unlike any other in TV history. The quality masterpiece, Sense8 centers around eight strangers—Will Gorski (Brian J. Smith), Riley Blue (Tuppence Middleton), Sun Bak (Bae Doona), Nomi Marks (Jamie Clayton), Kala Dandekar (Tina Desai), Wolfgang Bogdanow (Max Riemelt), Lito Rodriguez (Miguel Ángel Silvestre), and Capheus Onyango (Toby Onwumere)—who, despite being separated by oceans, are mentally and emotionally linked, able to share memories, feelings, skills, and terrifying danger.

Sense8 is a true sci-fi spectacle, acting not only as a pure celebration of love, understanding, and what makes humanity beautiful, but also a thrilling exploration of identity, psychic connection, and survival that frequently finds new ways to bring its protagonists together despite them living so very far apart. It’s a truly powerful series, with each of its episodes expanding the idea that being truly seen by someone else can be its own form of desperate survival. Sense8 is no doubt one of Netflix’s most rallying shows, as it rose from cancellation through the pure devotion fans held for the amazing series. The series is a spectacular gem that is simply too underrated for its status as a genuine masterpiece. Sense8’s boldness and will to go where very few TV shows have makes it a quality pick for this list of shows with truly masterful installments.

1

‘Dark’ (2017–2020)

Image via Netflix

Advertisement

Dark is a complex sci-fi drama that brilliantly wields its episodes as if they’re carefully placed pieces of an incredibly large design. The captivating German series kicks off with the disappearance of children in the small town of Winden. This sets off an investigation that gradually exposes generations of strange events surrounding the town’s nuclear power plant, buried family secrets, and a mysterious passage capable of connecting different periods of time. As the mystery grows, the lives of several families become irrevocably intertwined, revealing that nearly every relationship, character, and seemingly minor event plays a role in a much larger cycle of cause and effect.

Dark is an extremely intricate masterpiece, and each of its episodes holds that very title simply because not one of the show’s chapters stands as wasteful. The series is incredibly complex, and tends to handsomely reward its audience for paying close attention to what may initially seem like insignificant conversations, relationships, objects, and background details, often becoming exceedingly important several installments—or even entire seasons—later. There is definitely no passive viewing with a series like Dark, as its episodes frequently reveal and establish new pieces of the larger, puzzling mystery. With very careful construction, the show delivers extraordinary chapters that can be reasonably announced as masterpieces, ones that maintain an impressive level of quality across three seasons. Dark makes certain that every detail within its compelling story matters, marking it a Netflix sci-fi banger that is a clear example of a 10/10 viewing experience that easily earns its spot on this list.

Advertisement

Dark

Advertisement

Release Date

2017 – 2020-00-00

Advertisement

Network

Netflix

Showrunner

Advertisement

Jantje Friese

Directors

Baran bo Odar

Advertisement

Advertisement

• 

  Louis Hofmann

  Jonas Kahnwald

• 

  Lisa Vicari

  Advertisement

  Martha Nielsen

Advertisement

Advertisement