TUCSON, Ariz. — Federal investigators have received and begun advanced forensic testing on new DNA evidence, including hair samples recovered from the Tucson-area home of Nancy Guthrie, more than 10 weeks after the 84-year-old mother of NBC “Today” co-anchor Savannah Guthrie was abducted from her residence in the early morning hours of Feb. 1.

Pima County Sheriff’s Office officials and sources close to the investigation confirmed that a private laboratory in Florida initially processed DNA material collected from Guthrie’s home in the Catalina Foothills neighborhood. That evidence, which includes hairs and possibly other traces described as “mixed,” was recently transferred to the FBI laboratory for next-generation analysis using cutting-edge technology capable of separating complex samples.

The development marks the latest potential breakthrough in a case that has captivated national attention since Guthrie vanished without her phone or shoes, leaving behind drops of her blood on the front porch. Authorities have consistently described the incident as a kidnapping, citing signs of forced entry or struggle at the residence.

Doorbell camera footage released by the FBI in February showed a masked figure, believed to be a suspect, lingering near Guthrie’s door on the night she disappeared. The individual appeared armed, and investigators have scrutinized every frame for clues, including possible distinctive items such as a ring or gloves. Additional surveillance images from the property have been reviewed, though no clear identification has emerged.

Guthrie’s pacemaker reportedly disconnected from her phone around 2:30 a.m., suggesting the device moved out of range as she was taken. Family members grew concerned when she missed a church service the following day and reported her missing. A search of the home revealed the blood evidence, which was confirmed to belong to Guthrie, shifting the case from a missing person investigation to an active abduction probe.

Multiple ransom-related communications have surfaced throughout the investigation. Some notes, including demands for cryptocurrency payment, were sent to media outlets such as TMZ. One recent message offered information about the kidnappers in exchange for reward money. Investigators continue to evaluate the authenticity of these claims while separating potential hoaxes from legitimate leads.

The family, including Savannah Guthrie and her siblings, has offered a substantial reward — up to $1 million — for information leading to Nancy Guthrie’s safe recovery. The FBI has added its own reward of up to $100,000. Tips have poured in, generating hundreds of leads that detectives are actively pursuing.

Early in the probe, tensions arose over evidence handling. Reports indicated initial friction between the Pima County Sheriff’s Office and the FBI regarding where certain items, including a glove found nearby, would be processed. The glove’s DNA did not match national databases or samples from the home, according to previous statements from Sheriff Chris Nanos. The family has been cleared as suspects.

Forensic experts and former investigators have offered public analysis. Some suggest the abduction may have begun as a burglary gone wrong, while others point to the possibility of someone known to Guthrie or local to the Tucson area. Statistical profiles of similar cases involving elderly women often indicate a personal connection or prior interaction, though no suspect has been named and authorities have released limited details on motives.

Nancy Guthrie, a widow, lived independently in the upscale Catalina Foothills suburb. Described by family as vibrant and active in her church community, she had no known enemies or high-risk behaviors that would explain a targeted attack. Her sudden disappearance in pajamas, without mobility aids she sometimes used, has fueled concerns about her vulnerability and current condition.

Savannah Guthrie returned to the “Today” anchor desk in early April after a two-month absence, speaking emotionally about the ongoing agony for her family. In public statements and social media posts, she has pleaded for anyone with information to come forward, emphasizing that someone knows how to bring her mother home. The family has coordinated with law enforcement while managing intense media scrutiny.

The case has drawn comparisons to other high-profile abductions of elderly victims, highlighting vulnerabilities in suburban neighborhoods. Experts note that stranger abductions of seniors are statistically rare, often pointing toward opportunistic crimes or personal grudges. Advanced DNA techniques now being applied could prove pivotal, as next-generation sequencing helps untangle mixed profiles that older methods might miss.

As the investigation enters its third month, search efforts have included extensive ground searches, drone surveillance and analysis of digital records. No arrests have been made, and Guthrie’s whereabouts remain unknown. Officials stress that the case remains very active, with forensic results potentially forthcoming in the coming weeks.

Community response in Tucson and nationwide has included vigils, tip lines and widespread sharing of the FBI’s wanted poster. Tips can be submitted anonymously to 1-800-CALL-FBI or through local authorities. The Pima County Sheriff’s Office continues to collaborate closely with the FBI despite earlier reported procedural differences.

Broader implications touch on elder safety, home security and the challenges of cold-case dynamics in the digital age. While doorbell cameras provided crucial initial footage, the masked suspect’s precautions have complicated identification. Ransom communications add layers of complexity, requiring careful verification to avoid diverting resources.

For the Guthrie family, each day without answers brings renewed hope mixed with heartache. Savannah Guthrie has balanced professional duties with private grief, using her platform sparingly to appeal for help rather than speculate.

Medical experts have expressed concern for an 84-year-old taken under duress, noting potential health complications from stress, lack of medication or environmental exposure. Her pacemaker history adds urgency to recovery efforts.

Investigators continue re-examining the timeline: Guthrie was last seen Jan. 31. The back door was reportedly found propped open, while blood evidence pointed to the front porch as a possible exit point. These details fuel theories about how the perpetrator gained access and removed her from the home.

As forensic labs process the latest hair and DNA samples, optimism surrounds the potential for a match or new lead. Sources indicate the mixed nature of the sample previously slowed progress, but FBI capabilities may overcome those hurdles.

The abduction has sparked discussions on true crime platforms and news coverage, with amateur sleuths and professionals alike dissecting available evidence. However, authorities caution against misinformation that could hinder the probe.

No major new physical searches were reported in recent days, shifting focus to laboratory work and tip follow-up. Sheriff Nanos has reiterated that all possibilities remain on the table, though the evidence strongly supports a criminal abduction rather than a voluntary disappearance.

Looking ahead, results from the advanced DNA testing could arrive within days or weeks, depending on lab backlog and sample complexity. A positive development might lead to genetic genealogy techniques or direct suspect identification if profiles align with known databases.

In the meantime, the family and investigators urge the public to remain vigilant. Small details — a vehicle seen in the area, unusual activity or knowledge of the ransom notes — could prove decisive.

The Nancy Guthrie case serves as a stark reminder of how quickly life can change, even in seemingly safe communities. For an elderly woman enjoying retirement, a single night altered everything for her loved ones and thrust the story into the national spotlight.

As April 18, 2026, marks roughly 77 days since her disappearance, the hope for resolution persists. Advanced science, persistent detective work and public assistance form the pillars of the ongoing effort to bring Nancy Guthrie home.

Anyone with information is encouraged to contact authorities immediately. The family continues to hold out for good news, their $1 million reward standing as a powerful incentive for that critical tip.

The investigation’s outcome could hinge on the hairs and traces now under FBI scrutiny. In a case defined by patience and precision, this latest forensic step represents renewed momentum in the search for answers.

NEW YORK — NVIDIA Corp. shares hover near $200 in mid-April 2026, trading as the world’s most valuable company with a market capitalization topping $4.9 trillion, as Wall Street analysts overwhelmingly recommend buying the stock amid unrelenting demand for its artificial intelligence chips.

The semiconductor giant, whose stock has seen volatile swings this year after a massive multi-year rally, continues to dominate the AI infrastructure market. As of April 17, 2026, NVIDIA closed at approximately $201.68, up about 1.68 percent in the session amid high trading volume exceeding 147 million shares. The 52-week range spans from a low near $95 to a high above $212, reflecting both the explosive growth in AI spending and periodic market concerns over valuations.

Analysts maintain a strong consensus “Buy” or “Strong Buy” rating on NVIDIA. Across more than 50 Wall Street firms, the overwhelming majority — often 90 percent or higher — rate the stock as a purchase. The average 12-month price target sits around $268 to $275, implying roughly 35 percent upside from current levels. Some optimistic forecasts reach as high as $400, while more conservative ones hover near $205.

Recent financial performance underscores the bullish case. In the most recent reported quarters, NVIDIA posted record revenues driven by its data center segment, which accounts for the vast majority of sales. Blackwell architecture chips, the company’s latest flagship for AI training and inference, have seen strong adoption across major cloud providers, hyperscalers and enterprises. CEO Jensen Huang has repeatedly described demand as “insane” or “off the charts,” with supply commitments and visibility extending well into future years.

For investors debating whether to buy or sell NVIDIA stock in 2026, the dominant narrative centers on artificial intelligence as a transformative, multi-year secular trend. Data center revenue has surged year-over-year, fueled by exponential growth in AI model training, inference workloads and the emergence of AI agents. Companies like Meta, Microsoft, Google and others continue pouring billions into GPU clusters to power large language models and next-generation applications.

NVIDIA’s upcoming Rubin platform, expected later in 2026, is already generating excitement as the successor to Blackwell. Analysts anticipate this next architecture will sustain momentum, with some projecting continued high-teens to low-20s percentage revenue growth rates even as the base expands dramatically. Gross margins remain robust, often exceeding 70 percent on a non-GAAP basis, supporting healthy profitability and free cash flow generation that funds share buybacks and innovation.

Yet the “sell” side of the debate highlights legitimate risks that could pressure the stock. NVIDIA trades at an elevated forward price-to-earnings multiple in the mid-20s to low-30s range depending on estimates, far above historical averages for semiconductor firms. Critics argue that much of the AI hype is already priced in, leaving limited room for error if hyperscaler capital expenditure growth decelerates or if economic conditions tighten.

Competition poses another headwind. Tech giants are developing in-house AI chips — such as Google’s TPUs, Amazon’s Trainium and custom silicon from startups — aiming to reduce reliance on NVIDIA hardware. While NVIDIA maintains an estimated 80-90 percent market share in high-end AI accelerators, any meaningful erosion could impact pricing power and growth trajectories.

Geopolitical tensions add uncertainty. U.S. export restrictions to China, a once-significant market, continue to limit sales. Management has guided future quarters assuming no meaningful data center revenue from China, shifting focus entirely to other regions. Any escalation in trade disputes or broader semiconductor supply chain disruptions could affect results.

Valuation concerns have manifested in periodic pullbacks. The stock entered 2026 with some softness amid broader market rotations away from mega-cap tech, though it has stabilized near recent highs. Short-term technical patterns show support levels around $180-190, with resistance near $210-220. Longer-term bulls point to historical resilience: NVIDIA has repeatedly overcome skepticism during previous chip cycles.

Institutional ownership remains high, with mutual funds and hedge funds maintaining significant positions. Retail investors, many of whom rode the post-2022 AI surge, continue monitoring the name closely. Options activity reflects mixed sentiment, with some positioning for volatility around upcoming earnings or product events.

For long-term holders, the bull thesis rests on AI’s expanding total addressable market. Estimates for the AI infrastructure opportunity range into the trillions over the coming decade, with NVIDIA positioned as the pick-and-shovel provider. Inference — running trained models in real-world applications — is seen as the next growth leg, potentially dwarfing training spending. Software advancements, including CUDA ecosystem lock-in, further entrench the company’s moat.

Short-term considerations for 2026 include the pacing of Blackwell ramp-up and early signals on Rubin adoption. Positive updates could catalyze fresh rallies, while any signs of softening demand or inventory buildup might trigger selloffs. Broader economic factors, including interest rates, corporate spending and potential recession risks, will also influence sentiment.

Diversification remains key advice from financial planners. While NVIDIA has delivered extraordinary returns for early believers, concentrated bets in any single stock carry risk, especially one as volatile as a high-growth technology leader. Investors considering new positions may dollar-cost average or wait for dips below key moving averages.

NVIDIA’s financial strength provides a buffer. The company generates tens of billions in free cash flow annually, maintains a fortress balance sheet with low debt relative to cash reserves, and consistently returns capital through dividends and aggressive buybacks. These factors support resilience during market corrections.

Looking further into 2026 and beyond, some optimistic models project NVIDIA shares could reach $250-$300 by year-end if AI spending trajectories hold. More cautious scenarios see the stock trading sideways or modestly higher if growth moderates to mid-30s percentages. A handful of bearish voices warn of potential 20-30 percent corrections if multiple compression coincides with any earnings miss.

Ultimately, the decision to buy or sell NVIDIA in 2026 hinges on an investor’s time horizon, risk tolerance and conviction in artificial intelligence as a once-in-a-generation platform shift. For growth-oriented portfolios, the consensus leans heavily toward accumulation on weakness. Value-conscious or defensive investors may prefer waiting for clearer evidence of sustainable margins or multiple contraction.

As the company prepares for its next earnings cycle and major technology conferences, all eyes remain on execution. NVIDIA has historically underpromised and overdelivered during AI’s ascent, building credibility that sustains premium valuations.

Market participants in Seoul and global financial centers continue tracking the stock closely, given its influence on broader technology indices and semiconductor supply chains. Exchange-traded funds heavy in NVIDIA, such as those tracking the Nasdaq-100, amplify its impact on retail portfolios worldwide.

In summary, while risks of competition, valuation and cyclical slowdown exist, the prevailing analyst view supports buying NVIDIA shares for those with a multi-year horizon. The AI tailwinds appear durable, powered by massive infrastructure buildouts that few other companies can match in scale or sophistication.

Investors should consult personal financial advisors and conduct thorough due diligence, as past performance does not guarantee future results. Stock prices can fluctuate sharply, and no single name should dominate any portfolio.

With AI adoption accelerating across industries — from healthcare and automotive to finance and entertainment — NVIDIA’s central role suggests the story has further chapters. Whether 2026 brings new highs or testing periods, the company remains at the epicenter of one of the most profound technological transformations in modern history.

Selling a property often results in a significant capital gain, leaving investors with a crucial decision—whether to reinvest for tax savings or deploy the funds to maximise long-term wealth. With multiple options available, from real estate reinvestment to equity exposure, choosing the right mix depends on time horizon, liquidity needs, and financial goals.

The same is the case with Aditya, a viewer of The Money Show on ETNow. He plans to invest capital gains from a property sale into a mix of high-growth and stable instruments for a long-term horizon of around 10 years. The key question is a suggestion on combination of investments for good returns and how time and amount-wise distribution should be done

Also Read | Gold ETFs deliver up to 61% return since last Akshaya Tritiya. Should you hold or book profits after the rally?

Understanding capital gains taxation

Explaining the basics, financial expert Shweta Jain said that capital gains from property arise when an asset is sold at a profit. If the property is held for more than two years, it qualifies as long-term capital gains.

She noted that taxation on such gains is currently structured at 12.5% without indexation or 20% with indexation from 2024.

“So, any property that is held for more than two years, you can have indexation. Indexation basically adjusts your cost of acquisition to current,” the expert said. Indexation helps adjust the purchase price of the property for inflation, thereby reducing the taxable gains.
She also highlighted that investors should explore legitimate ways to save on capital gains tax, depending on whether they want to reinvest in property or other eligible assets. “So, your cost of acquisition sort of increases, so profit reduces for capital gains calculations. So, when you have a profit, you want to sort of save the capital gains also because you do not want to pay tax on the entire thing if you can help it. There are legit ways to save capital gains especially on property,” Jain said.

Reinvesting in property vs exploring other options

One of the most common ways to save tax is reinvesting the gains into another property. However, Jain pointed out that while this helps in tax efficiency, it may not always be the best option for wealth creation.

She explained that real estate investments come with limitations such as large capital commitment, lower liquidity, and constraints in quickly accessing funds when needed. This makes it important for investors to evaluate whether locking a significant amount into another property aligns with their broader financial goals.

There are a few sections based on whether you want to buy another property, whether you already have another property in consideration, whether you want to buy any other long-term asset, whether it is again a property, Jain said.

Also Read | Planning investments for specially-abled child? Focus on structure, not just returns says Harshvardhan Roongta

Role of equity in long-term wealth creation

The expert said Aditya can invest in another property if he wishes to save capital gains tax. However, we also have the opportunity of maximising his wealth. So, property again comes with its own set of restrictions whether it is a huge amount of capital being blocked or limited liquidity requirement if required to liquidate immediately or other sort of constraints when it comes to property.

For investors with a longer time horizon, equity can be a compelling alternative. Jain said that equity investments are better suited for goals beyond five years, as they have the potential to generate higher returns over time despite short-term volatility.

Given Aditya’s 10-year horizon, a combination of equity and relatively stable instruments could help balance growth and risk. However, the exact allocation would depend on his risk appetite and financial needs.

Balancing growth and stability

The key, Jain suggested, is to avoid concentrating the entire capital gains into a single asset class and instead diversify across instruments to optimise returns while managing risk.

Capital gains from property sales present an opportunity not just for tax planning but also for long-term wealth creation. While reinvesting in property can offer tax benefits, investors should weigh it against liquidity constraints and return potential. A well-balanced portfolio with a mix of equity and stable assets, aligned with a long-term horizon, can help achieve both growth and financial flexibility.

(Disclaimer: Recommendations, suggestions, views and opinions given by the experts are their own. These do not represent the views of The Economic Times)

If you have any mutual fund queries, message on ET Mutual Funds on Facebook/Twitter. We will get it answered by our panel of experts. Do share your questions on ETMFqueries@timesinternet.in alongwith your age, risk profile, and twitter handle