Connect with us
DAPA Banner

Business

California accuses Amazon of pressuring retailers to raise prices, court filings show

Published

on

Amazon adds seller surcharge as oil spike from Iran tensions drives logistics costs higher

California officials allege Amazon may have quietly driven up prices across the internet by pressuring retailers and brands not to undercut its listings, according to newly unsealed court evidence.

The allegations, revealed Monday as part of the state’s antitrust lawsuit, claim Amazon worked behind the scenes with companies like Levi Strauss and others to influence pricing at competitors including Walmart, Home Depot and Chewy.

Advertisement

In one example cited by the state, Levi’s allegedly pushed Walmart to raise the price of khaki pants after Amazon raised concerns about a lower listing. In another, Amazon encouraged suppliers to coordinate price increases on products like pet treats – moves California says helped Amazon avoid having to match lower prices.

“As we are not a party to this litigation, we have no comment on the subject allegations,” a Levi Strauss spokesperson said.

FOX Business reached out to Walmart, Home Depot and Chewy.

AMAZON DISRUPTING ITSELF, REBUILDING CUSTOMER SHOPPING EXPERIENCE AROUND AI FROM GROUND UP

Advertisement
amazon driver

A worker near packages in an Amazon delivery vehicle in San Francisco, California, US, on Monday, Feb. 2, 2026.  (David Paul Morris/Bloomberg via Getty Images)

State officials argue the conduct was not isolated, but part of a broader strategy used across product categories over several years. The filing outlines three alleged tactics: encouraging competitors to raise prices, temporarily breaking price matches, so higher prices stick, and in some cases removing lower-priced products from rival sites altogether.

In certain instances, vendors allegedly pulled products from competing retailers entirely – eliminating cheaper options before prices rose on Amazon and elsewhere.

The filing also claims Amazon enforced compliance by leveraging its market power, including threatening to suppress product listings, limit promotions or impose financial penalties on vendors that allowed lower prices on other platforms.

AMAZON ADDS SELLER SURCHARGE AS OIL SPIKE FROM IRAN TENSIONS DRIVES LOGISTICS COSTS HIGHER

Advertisement

Officials say vendors often had little choice but to comply, given Amazon’s scale and importance to their business.

“Amazon is illegally working to rake in profits by making sure consumers have nowhere else to turn to for lower prices,” Attorney General Rob Bonta said in a statement.

Rob Bonta

California Attorney General Rob Bonta speaks to the media following graduation ceremonies for the School of Social Ecology at UC Irvine in Irvine, CA on Monday, June 16, 2025. (Paul Bersebach/MediaNews Group/Orange County Register via Getty Images)

Amazon denied the claims, saying its agreements with sellers are legal and help ensure competitive pricing and product availability. The company said it is “consistently identified as America’s lowest-priced online retailer” and called the lawsuit an attempt to distract from a weak case.

The filing also alleges Amazon discouraged employees from documenting sensitive pricing discussions in writing, instead encouraging the use of phone calls.

Advertisement
Exterior view showing the Amazon logo mounted on the building housing the company’s German headquarters in Munich.

The Amazon logo is displayed on the façade of Amazon Germany’s headquarters in Parkstadt Schwabing, Munich, Bavaria, on Jan. 27, 2026. (Matthias Balk/picture alliance via Getty Images)

The case comes as Amazon’s scale continues to grow – the company recently surpassed Walmart in annual revenue – intensifying scrutiny over its influence on online pricing.

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX BUSINESS APP

California is seeking to block the alleged practices and recover profits, with a hearing scheduled for July and trial set for January 2027.

Reuters contributed to this report. 

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Business

How a small handful of exchange-traded funds can build a sensible portfolio

Published

on

US stocks fall as Middle East tensions drive oil prices higher

Most people who delay investing aren’t doing so because they think putting their money into the markets is a bad idea. They’re stuck in front of a confusing smorgasbord of options, afraid to pile the wrong things on their plate and at least a little afraid of looking like they don’t know what they’re doing (especially if it’s true). Thus, analysis paralysis is often the default.

Have no fear. There’s a quick and simple way to build a sensible portfolio by using a small handful of exchange-traded funds (ETFs). So, without further ado, let’s get some clarity over what’s going to go into this portfolio and how much of an allocation each ETF should get.

Advertisement

Here’s the easy ETF portfolio you’ve been looking for

For a portfolio to count as being both good and easy, it needs to be anchored with a hearty helping of market-tracking index funds. That way, you’ll get exposure to growth and quite a lot of diversification, which will help to insulate you from all sorts of risks.

Wall Street traders.

Traders work on the floor at the New York Stock Exchange in New York City March 3, 2026. (Brendan McDermid/Reuters)

COULD S&P 500 ETFS ALONE FUND YOUR ENTIRE RETIREMENT?

Therefore, 65% of the portfolio could be allocated to the Vanguard S&P 500 ETF, and 20% could be allocated to the iShares Core MSCI Total International Stock ETF.

Ticker Security Last Change Change %
VOO VANGUARD S&P 500 ETF – USD DIS 647.30 -4.24 -0.65%
IXUS ISHARES TRUST CORE MSCI TOTAL INTL STK 91.98 -1.89 -2.01%

The Vanguard ETF has an expense ratio of just 0.03% annually and tracks the performance of the biggest public companies listed in the U.S., whereas the iShares ETF has an annual expense ratio of 0.07% and tracks the performance of the biggest international companies, explicitly not including those in the U.S. 

Advertisement

The point of having both of these in the portfolio is that you’ll be diversified across business sectors and across geographies, which reduces the chance that problems in the U.S. or any other specific country will drag down your portfolio’s performance as a whole.

Those two ETFs focus on stocks. A well-rounded and sufficiently diversified portfolio also needs some exposure to bonds to ensure that it has a fairly safe source of yield when times get tough, and to cryptocurrency, as it isn’t represented well in any of the other ETFs.

GOLDMAN SACHS COMPLETES INNOVATOR CAPITAL ACQUISITION, LIFTING ETF ASSETS TO $90B

Thus, you could also allocate 10% of the portfolio to the Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF and 5% to the iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF.

Advertisement

In a nutshell, BND is crash insurance. It holds more than 17,000 U.S. investment-grade bonds for an annual expense ratio of just 0.03%. Its trailing-12-month yield is only 3.9%, but it isn’t intended to be a major growth driver for your portfolio anyway.

Ticker Security Last Change Change %
BND VANGUARD TOTAL BOND MARKET ETF – USD 73.78 -0.23 -0.31%
IBIT ISHARES BITCOIN TRUST – USD ACC 42.51 -0.74 -1.71%

The Bitcoin Trust position provides exposure to spot bitcoin as the name implies. The point of owning it is that it’ll help you to benefit from the cryptocurrency’s status as a scarce store of value, and it might help to guard your portfolio against inflation too. It’ll cost you a bit more than the other ETFs, with an expense ratio of 0.25%, but the potential growth that it offers is worth the price.

There isn’t much maintenance required

This portfolio can hum along for years without any intervention from you. But there is one thing you can do to slightly boost its performance.

VANGUARD FUND STRIPS OUT CHINA IN EMERGING MARKETS INVESTMENT PLAY

Advertisement

Once a year, open your brokerage or retirement account and compare each fund’s current weighting to its allocation target described above.

People outside the New York Stock Exchange.

Pedestrians walk past an American flag displayed outside the New York Stock Exchange in New York Sept. 12, 2016. (Michael Nagle/Bloomberg via Getty Images / Getty Images)

If any position has drifted by more than five percentage points from its target allocation, it’s wise to sell a little of the winner and buy a little of the laggard. You’re selling high and buying low, and that’s the entire (mostly voluntary) maintenance obligation. Inside a tax-advantaged account like a Roth IRA or a 401(k), rebalancing triggers no tax consequences, and many brokerages can even automate the process for target-weight portfolios if that’s something that interests you.

GET FOX BUSINESS ON THE GO BY CLICKING HERE

Start with whatever amount of capital you have on hand, add to your holdings in the proper proportions when you can, rebalance the portfolio once a year and let time in the market do the rest of the work. The longer you’re willing to let this money grow, the better off you’re likely to be.

Advertisement

Alex Carchidi has positions in Bitcoin and iShares Bitcoin Trust. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Bitcoin, Vanguard S&P 500 ETF, Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF, and iShares Bitcoin Trust. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

Continue Reading

Business

Govt may keep Rs 7,500 cr outlay for IT hardware manufacturing under PLI scheme

Published

on

The Economic Times
NEW DELHI: The government may keep an outlay of Rs 7,500 crore under the production linked incentive scheme for IT hardware products like personal computers, laptops, tablets and servers, according to a source aware of the development.

Foreign companies looking for incentives under the scheme may have to invest Rs 500 crore over four years, while the threshold for domestic firms is likely to be around Rs 20 crore for five years, the source who did not wish to be named said.

“Meity (Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology) will take the Cabinet approval of the detailed guidelines soon and is hopeful of rolling out the scheme from next financial year. The incentive outlay is likely to be around Rs 7,500 crore,” the source said.

The government has announced a cumulative production linked incentive of Rs 2 lakh crore for 10 sectors to encourage domestic manufacturing after seeing traction of global giants like Apple’s contract manufacturers, Samsung etc for the scheme in the mobile devices segment.

Advertisement

According to mobile devices industry body ICEA, India has the potential to scale up its cumulative laptop and tablet manufacturing capacity to over Rs 7 lakh crore by 2025 through policy interventions.

Scaling up laptop and tablet PC manufacturing can take the share of India in the global market to 26 per cent from 1 per cent at present.