The market is not the only thing that shrinks to a city radius. The evidence an assistant needs before it will name a business shrinks too, and most local operators have never audited whether that evidence actually exists.

Why does a city-level market behave differently to a national one in AI search?

A national brand can earn a citation through scale: enough content, enough backlinks, enough independent coverage that an assistant has plenty of material to draw on regardless of exactly who is asking. A city-level business does not get that luxury.

SOCi’s 2026 Visibility Index found ChatGPT recommends just 1.2% of those locations, compared to a 35.9% appearance rate in the Google local 3-Pack. AI search is roughly 30 times more selective than traditional local search, which means a city-level business does not have the volume of corroborating signals to absorb inconsistency the way a national brand can.

Its entire addressable market is often 200,000 people, and the pool of independent sources able to mention it is proportionally small: a handful of local directories, 1 or 2 industry bodies, a council register, and occasionally a regional trade press mention.

That means a local business has far less room for error. A missing or inconsistent detail that a national brand can absorb across thousands of other signals becomes, for a local business, 1 of only a dozen or so signals an assistant has to work with. Get 3 of those wrong and there is nothing left to build a confident answer from.

What are the 3 inputs that decide local AI visibility?

Local visibility comes down to 3 inputs, and all 3 need to be right at the same time. None of them substitutes for the others.

BrightLocal’s 2026 consumer survey found 45% of consumers now use AI tools for local business recommendations, up from 6% the year prior. Getting these 3 inputs right is no longer a technical preference. It is a commercial requirement.

Each input answers a different question an assistant is implicitly asking: is this business real and current, does anyone besides the business itself vouch for it, and does its content actually match the phrase a local buyer typed in. A business that gets 2 of the 3 right and skips the third is not two-thirds visible. It is invisible on exactly the questions the third input was meant to answer, because an assistant weighing whether to name a business rarely has enough local evidence to compensate for 1 input that returns nothing at all.

What Does “Consistent” Mean for Profile Completeness?

Consistency means the business’s core facts, name, category, hours, service area, and contact details, read identically everywhere they appear, not just accurately on the business’s own site. Google’s local ranking guidance is explicit that local rankings depend on relevance, distance, and prominence, and that complete, accurate information is what allows a business to be matched correctly against a search in the first place.

Relevance is the input a business controls most directly, and it is also the one most often left half finished. A trade business that lists 6 services but only names 2 of them anywhere in its profile description is asking Google, and by extension any assistant drawing on that data, to guess at the other 4. A profile with an outdated service area, a category that no longer matches what the business does, or hours that haven’t been updated since a public holiday last year, all quietly reduce that relevance score before an assistant even reaches the content on the website itself.

A pattern worth checking specifically: businesses that update their own website regularly but treat their places profile as a one-time setup task. The website gets a new services page every few months. The profile, set up 3 years ago, still lists an old address format, an outdated category, or a service area that hasn’t kept pace with where the business now actually works. An assistant weighing the profile against the website sees 2 sources describing 2 slightly different businesses, and resolves that inconsistency by trusting neither fully.

It’s why specialist teams such as Intelligent Resourcing, a Melbourne answer engine optimisation team, start a local audit at the profile layer before touching citations or content. It’s the fastest gap to close, and the first thing an assistant checks.

Why Do Council, Chamber and Industry-Body Citations Carry Weight?

A profile a business controls is a claim. A council register, a chamber of commerce directory, or an industry body’s member list is a claim made by someone else, and that distinction matters more at city scale than at national scale, because a local business has so few of these independent sources available to it in the first place.

A Perth-based water filtration company is a useful illustration of exactly this gap. Its own site named its services and location clearly and consistently, everything the first input above would ask for, yet it still went unnamed when local buyers asked an assistant which water treatment company to use, because almost nothing beyond its own homepage corroborated what the homepage said. No local trade directory listing, no chamber of commerce mention, no industry-association page repeating the same facts independently.

That gap is what local third-party mentions close. Whitespark’s 2026 ranking factors, the first edition to specifically track AI search visibility alongside the traditional local pack, found that citation signals and third-party authority carry weight across both surfaces: “In AI SEO, mentions (citations) are the new link.” A city-level business with 3 or 4 credible independent mentions is working from a materially stronger position than one relying on its own website alone.

This is also where a generic backlink strategy misreads the problem. A link from an unrelated national blog does very little for a city-level business, because it says nothing about whether this business operates in this city and does this specific work. A single line in a chamber of commerce member directory, by contrast, is a small signal that says exactly that, and it is the kind of signal an assistant weighing a local query is specifically looking for.

Why Do the Same Tactics Not Transfer Between Local and National Businesses?

The clearest way to see why local and national visibility need different playbooks is to put a city-level trade business and a national software company side by side.

A national SaaS company that spends a quarter chasing 2 more local directory listings has wasted the quarter, because those listings are a rounding error against everything else already vouching for it. A Melbourne trade business that spends the same quarter writing more blog content instead of fixing its council and chamber listings has made the same mistake in reverse. The tactic that wins for one is close to irrelevant for the other, because the size of the available evidence pool is what decides where the marginal hour of work actually pays off.

The practical takeaway is not that content or backlinks stop mattering for a local business. It is that the order of operations flips. A national company can afford to treat citations as a background task while it invests most of its effort in content, because it already has hundreds of citations working in its favour. A city-level business gets the opposite return on the same hour: closing 1 citation gap changes more than writing 1 more page, simply because it is filling 1 of a dozen slots rather than 1 of several hundred.

LocaliQ’s 2026 SEO statistics confirm 46% of all Google searches carry local intent. That volume is weighted against evidence pools of very different sizes: a national brand may have hundreds of independent sources vouching for it, whereas a city-level business has a handful.

When Is It Worth Bringing in Outside Help for a Local AI Audit?

Alt Text Image 03: Five-day local AI visibility audit timeline showing three stages: business profile audit, third-party citation check, and local content review, with icons connected in a horizontal process flow.

Five-day local AI visibility audit timeline showing three stages: business profile audit, third-party citation check, and local content review, with icons connected in a horizontal process flow.

A local business does not need external help to run a first pass on all 3 inputs. It needs a week and a checklist.

Day 1 to 2: Profile completeness

• Confirm the business name, category, hours, and service area match exactly across every places listing the business controls
• Fill in every service the business actually offers, not just the top 2 or 3
• Check the phone number and address are current everywhere, including on old directory listings the business no longer actively manages

Day 3 to 4: Third-party mentions

• List every council register, chamber of commerce, and industry body the business is eligible to join or already belongs to
• Confirm the business is actually listed, and that the listing states the same facts as the profile
• Identify the 2 or 3 gaps that are realistic to close within a month

BrightLocal’s expert citation survey found 90% of local SEO experts say accurate citations are important to local search ranking. The third-party mention step is where that accuracy gap is most commonly found.

Day 5: Service-area phrasing

• Read the site’s own content and check whether it names the suburb or region the way a local buyer would actually type or ask it, not just once in a footer
• Rewrite the first sentence of any page that never states where the business operates

That week produces a clear list of gaps, and closing the easy ones takes another few weeks of a business owner’s own time. Where it usually pays to bring in outside help is the third-party mention gap specifically, because building relationships with the right local directories, associations, and press contacts is slower and less DIY-friendly than fixing a profile field.

It is also worth treating this as an ongoing check rather than a one-off project. A council register or industry-body listing that was accurate this year can drift out of date after an office move or a rebrand, and a competitor entering the same directories resets the comparison an assistant is implicitly making. Reviewing all 3 inputs once a quarter, rather than once and never again, is what keeps a local business’s evidence pool from quietly going stale.

A specialist team with working relationships across local citation sources can close that gap in weeks rather than the months it takes a business owner doing it alone alongside their actual job.

The businesses that get named are not always the best ones. They are the ones an assistant has enough independent evidence to name confidently, and for a city-level business, that evidence pool is small enough that every gap actually matters.

Skip To Content

Raised in Goderich and Barrie, Tilbe developed an early interest in both structured and creative activities. He played saxophone, earned recognition at local music festivals, studied karate to black belt level, and became interested in photography, history, science, and visual art.

His education followed a similarly varied path. After studying introductory media, he completed programmes in digital photography and web design at Georgian College. He later studied computer science at Laurentian University and film and television at Canadore College.

Scott Kresan Tilbe has worked as an independent photographer and web designer and has held photography roles with organisations including Auction House Barrie and Edge Imaging. Earlier customer-facing roles at Toys “R” Us and RONA also gave him experience in sales, support, and communication.

For the past four years, he has worked as an office administrator at a gastroenterology clinic in Barrie. His role involves supporting day-to-day office operations, managing priorities, and helping maintain an organised environment for staff and patients.

Across each stage of his career, Tilbe has continued to build practical skills while maintaining his creative interests. His experience shows how technical knowledge, visual thinking, and strong organisation can complement one another across different professional settings.

How did your early interests shape the direction of your career?

I had a lot of different interests when I was younger, and I think that shaped the way my career developed. I played saxophone and competed in local music festivals. I also trained in karate and eventually earned my black belt. At the same time, I became interested in photography, history, science, art, and computers.

Those things may sound unrelated, but they all taught me something useful. Music required practice. Karate required discipline. Photography trained me to notice details. History and science encouraged me to keep asking questions. I think I carried all of that into my education and later into my work.

You studied several different subjects. Was that always intentional?

Not completely. I knew I was interested in media and visual work, but I also liked technology. I studied introductory media and then completed programmes in digital photography and web design at Georgian College. Later, I studied computer science at Laurentian University and film and television at Canadore College.

I was interested in understanding both the creative and technical sides of media. Photography taught me composition and visual communication. Web design made me think about how people interact with information. Computer science introduced a more structured approach to problem-solving.

I do not think every educational experience has to lead to one specific job. Sometimes the value is in the way it changes how you think.

What did working in photography teach you about professional responsibility?

Photography is creative, but professional photography also requires a great deal of preparation and organisation. You have to understand what the client needs, pay attention to deadlines, manage equipment, communicate properly, and still produce work that meets a certain standard.

I worked independently and also had photography roles with organisations such as Auction House Barrie and Edge Imaging. Those experiences taught me that having technical ability is only part of the job. You also need to be dependable.

A good photograph may be the final result people see, but there is usually a lot of planning behind it.

How did web design add to that perspective?

Web design made me think more about the person using the finished product. Something can look impressive but still be difficult to navigate. I learned to think about layout, clarity, function, and how information is presented.

When I worked on independent web design projects, I tried to balance visual appeal with practicality. I still use that way of thinking in other areas. You have to ask what someone actually needs rather than only thinking about what you personally like.

You also worked in retail. What did those roles contribute to your career?

Working at Toys “R” Us and RONA gave me experience dealing directly with customers and working as part of a larger team. Retail can teach you a lot about communication because you interact with many different personalities.

You also learn that people do not always explain exactly what they need. Sometimes you have to listen carefully, ask the right questions, and then help them find a solution. That is useful in almost any profession.

How did you move into office administration?

For the past four years, I have worked as an office administrator at a gastroenterology clinic in Barrie. It is different from photography or web design, but there are more similarities than people might expect.

Administration requires attention to detail, prioritisation, communication, and the ability to manage several responsibilities at once. I use schedules and task lists to decide what needs immediate attention and what can be handled later.

I like having structure. At the same time, office work can be unpredictable, so you have to be able to adapt when priorities change.

Has your creative background helped you in administrative work?

Yes. Creative work teaches you to look at a problem from more than one angle. In photography, moving a few feet or changing the lighting can completely change the result. In web design, changing how information is organised can make something much easier to understand.

I think that translates into administration. If a process is not working well, I naturally start thinking about how it might be organised differently.

What do you think makes someone dependable in the workplace?

For me, it comes down to completing work properly and on time. I want the finished result to meet the standards of the people I am working with, but I also have my own standards.

I measure success partly by whether I can look at something I have completed and know that I gave it the attention it required. Positive feedback matters, but you also have to be able to evaluate your own work honestly.

How do you continue developing professionally?

I read constantly, especially about history and science, and I attend conferences or learning opportunities when they relate to my interests. I also like talking with people who know more about a subject than I do.

I think curiosity is important. Your formal education ends at some point, but learning does not have to.

What has your career taught you about having several professional interests?

I used to think that having several interests might make it harder to define what I do. Now I see it differently.

Administration, photography, and web design each use different skills, but there is overlap. They all require organisation, patience, communication, attention to detail, and the ability to understand others’ needs.

I do not think everyone has to fit neatly into one category. Sometimes having experience in several areas gives you a better way of approaching the work in front of you.

The S&P 500 fell 0.43 points, or 0.01%, to 7,764.27 points while the Nasdaq Composite rose 121.15 points, or 0.45%, to 27,243.24. The Dow Jones Industrial Average fell 184.94 points, or 0.36%, to 51,863.89.

Chip stocks extended their recent gains while shares of consumer-focused software companies declined as investors assessed the strong response to Meta Platforms’ new AI assistant.

The assistant, called Muse, launched earlier this month can send emails and carry out transactions on a user’s behalf. Its early success lifted AI-related chip stocks in recent sessions, but it also sparked concerns that the technology could disrupt retailers, online brokerages and other consumer businesses. Amazon blocked Muse from shopping on its platform on Monday.

“There are a lot of tech stocks that are down today on Muse-related fears of one sort or another,” Jed Ellerbroek, portfolio manager at Argent Capital Management, told Reuters. “People fear that Muse will be used to manage your insurance relationships, book your travel and search for stuff to buy.”

Live Events

Uber Technologies and Lyft fell about 1% each, while Expedia dropped 4% and Charles Schwab slid 5.5%. Micron gained 3.9%, and SanDisk surged 7.2%.
Oil prices were choppy near $100 a barrel, while the yield on the benchmark 10-year Treasury note hovered around 4.94% after US President Donald Trump warned in a speech to the UN General Assembly that he could “annihilate the Islamic Republic” if no deal is reached to end the Middle East conflict.Investors also turned their attention to Thursday’s US-China summit amid speculation that the trade truce with Beijing could be extended and that the talks may include AI regulation.

“What people are looking for is at least the start of a conversation that maybe you can come up with some sort of global framework as opposed to fighting each other and having this race and so,” said Joe Saluzzi, head of equity market structure research at Themis Trading.

JPMorgan Chase and Wells Fargo both lost ground.

Meanwhile, Boston Federal Reserve President Susan Collins said she supported last week’s interest-rate increase because of inflation risks. New York Fed President John Williams said the Fed’s framework for managing short-term rates had effectively supported financial markets.

Traders saw a 53% probability that the central bank would raise interest rates by at least 25 basis points in October, according to CME Group’s FedWatch Tool.

(Disclaimer: This article is based on inputs from agencies. These do not represent the views of The Economic Times)

Erie Indemnity Company (ERIE), with a market capitalization of approximately $11 billion, is a management company serving Erie Insurance Exchange, a subscriber-owned property and casualty insurer. Based in Erie, Pennsylvania, it manages key sales, underwriting, policy issuance, and administrative functions on behalf of policyholders through the Erie Insurance Group.

Companies valued between $10 billion and $200 billion are generally classified as “large-cap stocks,” and Erie Indemnity fits this description, with its market capitalization reflecting its substantial size and established position within the financial services sector. Erie Indemnity stands out for its strong financial foundation and focused insurance business model. As attorney-in-fact for Erie Insurance Exchange, it receives recurring management fee revenue, while low debt, strong cash flow, and high profitability support financial resilience and operational stability.

More News from Barchart

Despite these strengths, ERIE has slipped 27.7% from its 52-week high of $330.54, reached on October 27, 2025. Over the past three months, ERIE stock has climbed 8.1%, outperforming the State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLF), which has gained 4.3% during the same time frame.

Shares of ERIE have declined 16.6% year-to-date and 25.2% over the past year, trailing the ETF’s 2% year-to-date gain and 3.2% increase over the same period.

ERIE shares have traded below both their 50-day and 200-day moving averages only since mid-September, signaling a recent downtrend.

Erie Indemnity has lagged the broader market over the past year, with its weaker stock performance coinciding with moderating premium growth and policy retention. The company’s recent results showed slower growth in direct written premiums, while policies in force and retention also declined, pointing to a more challenging growth environment.

Still, Erie reported second-quarter results on July 30, with net income rising 3.2% year over year to $180.3 million, or $3.45 per share, while revenue increased 2.8% to $1.09 billion. The results highlighted continued earnings resilience despite slower growth trends. Erie shares subsequently jumped 3.6% in the following trading session, suggesting a positive market reaction to the quarterly results.

In the competitive financial services sector, Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. (MRSH) posted a smaller decline than ERIE, falling 5.7% year-to-date and 10.8% over the past 52 weeks.

Wall Street analysts remain moderately bullish on ERIE’s prospects. The three analysts covering it give the stock a consensus “Moderate Buy” rating.

On the date of publication, Kritika Sarmah did not have (either directly or indirectly) positions in any of the securities mentioned in this article. All information and data in this article is solely for informational purposes. This article was originally published on Barchart.com

AHRENSBURG, GERMANY—MC Mühlenchemie now offers enzyme systems in its Pastazym HighProtein series that are designed specifically for producing pasta with protein content of 18% or higher.

Both the amount and the source of protein may affect pasta negatively, according to the Ahrensburg-based company. Protein sources like wheat germ and legumes may overpower pasta flavor and alter color. Other potential issues are unstable dough, difficult extrusion, susceptibility to breaking, rough or matte surfaces, sticky texture, and variable cooking stability. The MC Mühlenchemie enzyme systems address the issues by stabilizing the protein network, reducing stickiness, improving surface quality and cooking tolerance, and contributing to sensory quality.

“At protein contents up to about 22% the challenges can generally be dealt with using targeted enzyme technology, making additional support of the gluten network beneficial,” said Jana Russnak, head of pasta applications at MC Mühlenchemie.

Higher protein content may require adding wheat gluten, according to the company.

Novig’s provocative marketing campaign featuring actor Sydney Sweeney generated a level of attention few conventional advertising campaigns could match, but industry veterans say the harder test lies ahead: converting viral buzz into funded, retained customer accounts for the sports prediction market platform.

The campaign, called “Just Sports” and launched ahead of the new NFL season, features Sweeney nude or partially clothed, with footballs, boxing gloves and other sporting equipment strategically positioned to preserve her modesty. Its central joke plays on Novig’s positioning within the prediction market industry: unlike some rivals, the platform offers only sports-related contracts, without political, war or death-related markets available elsewhere in the sector. Sweeney, who reportedly approached Novig about working together and has since become an equity holder in the company, was closely involved in developing the campaign. She told Complex the concept was enjoyable and aligned with her own interest in sports.

The imagery quickly spread well beyond Novig’s existing audience, generating a backlash led primarily by female athletes who argued the campaign reduced women’s presence in sports to sexual display. Former UCLA gymnast Gracie Kramer responded by sharing footage of herself competing, captioned, “I don’t know what Sydney Sweeney was doing, but this is what a woman in sports looks like.” British sprinter Amy Hunt, Olympic swimming champion Ariarne Titmus and water polo player Tilly Kearns were among other athletes who criticized the campaign. International rugby player Sofie Fella separately questioned why advertising budgets were being directed toward the campaign rather than toward investment in women’s sport, while other critics argued the ad undermined broader efforts to have female athletes evaluated on their athletic achievements rather than their appearance. The controversy was subsequently covered by outlets including the BBC and The New York Times.

Novig Chief Executive Officer Jacob Fortinsky defended the campaign publicly, saying the company remained “hugely supportive” of women’s sport and had never intended for Sweeney to serve as a representative of female athletes generally. Sweeney responded to the criticism separately by pointing to prior nude photoshoots involving elite sportswomen as precedent for the kind of imagery used in the campaign.

Tony Kenny, a communications industry veteran who previously served as head of sponsorship and public relations at William Hill and held a senior communications role at Paddy Power, said the campaign has clearly succeeded at the earliest stage of building a new customer base, even as significant uncertainty remains about what follows. “It has done a brilliant job of getting that attention,” Kenny said. “Absolutely, at the top of the funnel it has created awareness. Interest and searches are happening, and downloads are happening. The commercial questions are whether people progress to registration and a funded account, and then whether Novig retains them and creates value from those customers. We are still at an early stage.”

Kenny drew a distinction between the kind of consumer response a viral advertisement can generate and the considerably higher bar required to convert that attention into a funded trading account. Unlike Sweeney’s earlier campaign for American Eagle, in which seeing her wear a specific pair of jeans could directly prompt a viewer to purchase those jeans, the Novig campaign offers no equally direct link between the imagery and the underlying product being sold. “This is not a free trial; people have to put in their hard-earned cash,” Kenny said. “That is a stretch for any gambling company.”

While Novig can track how much traffic arrives through links embedded in its advertising and social media channels, Kenny noted that outside observers, and likely much of the company’s own leadership, cannot yet determine how many of those campaign-driven downloads translated into registered users, how many of those users went on to fund an account, or whether those who did trade an initial contract returned to the platform afterward. Separating the campaign’s specific effect from the broader seasonal uplift tied to the start of the NFL season adds a further layer of difficulty to any attempt to measure its true commercial impact.

Looking beyond the immediate attention generated by the campaign, Kenny said the more fundamental question facing Novig is what the company now wants its brand to represent going forward. “Novig has attention, awareness and some recall, but what does it want to be associated with?” he said. “Sydney Sweeney is now an equity partner. Is she going to be the face of Novig, or will the company pivot? From a communications and marketing perspective, the interesting question is: what next?” That question carries additional weight given that Novig itself is not an inherently self-explanatory name to a general audience; while industry insiders and experienced bettors may recognize it as a reference to “no vig,” describing trading without a conventional bookmaker’s margin, that meaning is unlikely to be understood by most people encountering the campaign for the first time.

Kenny pointed to his own experience at Paddy Power as an example of how provocative marketing can work when irreverence is genuinely embedded in a brand’s established identity, something he said requires sustained consistency rather than a single viral moment. “Paddy Power’s irreverence is authentic to the brand, and it creates shareable content,” Kenny said. “That is the key.” He suggested Novig could attempt to position itself similarly against larger, more corporate-feeling rivals such as Kalshi and Polymarket within the U.S. prediction market sector, but cautioned that sustaining such an identity across a market as large and culturally varied as the United States would represent a substantial ongoing undertaking, one that would require the company to keep producing attention-grabbing campaigns without simply repeating the same approach indefinitely.

“This will be a non-story next week,” Kenny said, describing the likely trajectory of public attention around the campaign. “What does it do as attention starts to die down? Does it flood the market with more ads?” For now, Kenny said, Novig has demonstrated a clear ability to seize a cultural moment and overshadow marketing campaigns from far larger, better-established competitors. What remains unproven, in his assessment, is whether the audience the campaign attracted actually understands what Novig sells, remembers the company’s name once the controversy fades, or has any real intention of becoming a paying customer.