Connect with us
DAPA Banner

Business

Pima County Sheriff’s ‘Troubling’ Statement on Nancy Guthrie Case Sparks Fresh Concerns

Published

on

Hartsfield-Jackson Atlanta Airport

TUCSON, Ariz. — Nearly three months after 84-year-old Nancy Guthrie vanished from her Catalina Foothills home, a new statement from Pima County Sheriff Chris Nanos and his attorney has intensified scrutiny of the investigation’s leadership, with county supervisors calling the response “problematic” and “troubling” for failing to meet legal standards for sworn testimony.

Guthrie, mother of NBC’s “Today” show co-anchor Savannah Guthrie, was last seen Jan. 31, 2026, after an evening at her daughter Annie’s home. She was reported missing Feb. 1 when she failed to appear for a virtual church service. Authorities believe she was abducted from her residence, where bloodstains matching her DNA were found on the front porch. No arrests have been made, and her whereabouts remain unknown as the case enters its 85th day.

The latest controversy centers on Nanos, who leads the department handling the high-profile probe. In response to demands from the Pima County Board of Supervisors, Nanos’ attorney submitted a 22- to 23-page document addressing allegations about the sheriff’s past employment history with the El Paso Police Department in the late 1970s and early 1980s. Supervisors had invoked Arizona statute ARS 11-253, seeking sworn reports on potential misrepresentations in his record.

District 2 Supervisor Matt Heinz described the submission as deeply concerning. “The core thing that I’m most concerned about, and baffled by, is that (Nanos) chose to submit these 20 pages unsworn,” Heinz told Arizona Public Media. “The statute requires that this be under oath, and he did not do that by the deadline. This must be under oath. That’s what the statute requires. I don’t know if he’s refusing to do so, or isn’t comfortable doing so, or what. But that is troubling.”

Advertisement

Fellow supervisor Jen Allen echoed worries that issues in the response were “downplayed.” The board had sought clarity on Nanos’ disciplinary record, including multiple suspensions during his El Paso tenure for allegations involving use of force, insubordination and other matters. Nanos resigned from that department in 1982 in lieu of termination, according to reports. His attorney argued the supervisors’ request did not explicitly demand sworn testimony.

This leadership drama unfolds against a backdrop of mounting criticism of the Guthrie investigation. Deputies’ union passed a unanimous no-confidence vote against Nanos in March, citing his past and calling for his immediate resignation. Community members and national observers have questioned the pace of progress, with some early investigative missteps alleged by law enforcement sources.

Forensic efforts continue. Hairs recovered from Guthrie’s home are being analyzed by the FBI laboratory, following initial testing at a private Florida lab used by the sheriff’s department. Blood on the porch confirmed as Guthrie’s DNA. No CODIS hits have been reported. The FBI has been involved since early in the case, and a $1 million family reward remains active for information leading to her recovery.

A recent sheriff’s department social media post caused widespread confusion and backlash when it stated “Update: Nancy has been located” alongside a poster. The message actually referred to a different elderly woman, Nancy Radakovich, who resembles Guthrie. Critics called the post “cruel” and “tone deaf” amid the ongoing anguish for the Guthrie family.

Advertisement

Nanos has occasionally addressed the case publicly. In one recent exchange, he denied rumors of a new person of interest with a curt “Nope.” Earlier statements emphasized that all Guthrie family members have been cleared as suspects and that investigators believe Nancy may still be alive.

The disappearance has gripped national attention. Savannah Guthrie has shared emotional appeals, and the family maintains hope while acknowledging the grim possibilities. Retired FBI profilers and experts have analyzed blood spatter evidence, suggesting a violent struggle at the threshold of her home. Theories range from a targeted abduction to random crime, but no solid suspect has emerged.

Pima County supervisors voted in March to compel Nanos to provide the sworn reports, with potential consequences for non-compliance including possible removal from office, though legal precedents are unclear. Nanos, a Democrat elected to the role, has three years left in his term. His attorney defended the sheriff’s long service with Pima County as unblemished.

Insiders have raised concerns about the experience level of some investigators assigned to the case, including reports that the homicide unit supervisor had limited prior experience in such investigations. The department has defended its work, noting collaboration with federal partners and ongoing analysis of multiple evidence streams.

Advertisement

As the case stretches on, public frustration grows. Amateur searchers and true crime enthusiasts have flooded the area, prompting increased patrols near Guthrie’s home and her daughter’s residence to prevent trespassing. The United Cajun Navy and other volunteer groups have offered assistance, though coordination remains challenging.

The Guthrie family’s pain is compounded by the spotlight. Savannah returned to “Today” while balancing the search. A second ransom-related message reportedly surfaced, but details remain limited as authorities urge the public to avoid speculation that could hinder the probe.

County officials stress that the sheriff’s personal controversies should not overshadow the need for resolution in the Guthrie case. Yet the timing has amplified calls for accountability. Heinz and others have linked broader trust issues in law enforcement to the revelations about Nanos’ early career.

For now, the investigation presses forward with DNA work, digital forensics and tip reviews. No timeline for breakthroughs has been offered. The sheriff’s department continues to ask for public tips while discouraging unverified theories, particularly those targeting cleared individuals.

Advertisement

The dual narratives — an unresolved abduction of an elderly woman tied to a beloved television personality, and questions swirling around the top lawman overseeing it — have created a perfect storm of public interest and skepticism. As supervisors review next steps on the sworn statement issue, Nancy Guthrie remains missing, her family pleading for answers and the community demanding both justice and competent leadership.

This story remains active, with potential developments in the coming days on both the search for Guthrie and the board’s response to the sheriff’s filing.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Business

BofA reiterates Nvidia stock rating on shareholder return potential

Published

on


BofA reiterates Nvidia stock rating on shareholder return potential

Continue Reading

Business

Celsius Resources not informed of MIC loan assignment to Kiri unit

Published

on


Celsius Resources not informed of MIC loan assignment to Kiri unit

Continue Reading

Business

Dollar steady as traders eye US-Iran talks, central banks

Published

on

Dollar steady as traders eye US-Iran talks, central banks


Dollar steady as traders eye US-Iran talks, central banks

Continue Reading

Business

Commodities: Oil Moves Higher Amid U.S.-Iran Stalemate

Published

on

Commodities: Oil Moves Higher Amid U.S.-Iran Stalemate

Commodities: Oil Moves Higher Amid U.S.-Iran Stalemate

Continue Reading

Business

Jury Selection Begins in High-Stakes OpenAI Lawsuit

Published

on

Disney Channels Remain Blocked on YouTube TV, Causing $30 Million

OAKLAND, Calif. — Elon Musk’s long-running legal battle with Sam Altman and OpenAI officially reached the courtroom Monday as jury selection began in a federal case that could reshape the artificial intelligence industry and determine billions of dollars in potential damages.

Elon Musk
Elon Musk

The high-profile civil trial, Musk v. Altman, centers on Musk’s allegations that Altman, OpenAI President Greg Brockman and the company betrayed OpenAI’s founding mission as a nonprofit dedicated to benefiting humanity. Musk claims the shift toward a for-profit model enriched Altman and others at the expense of the original charter he helped establish.

U.S. District Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers is presiding over the case in Oakland federal court. Jury selection started Monday morning, with opening arguments expected Tuesday. The liability phase is projected to last through mid-May, followed by a remedies phase if Musk prevails. Musk is seeking damages estimated between $79 billion and $134 billion, which he has pledged to donate to charity if successful.

Core Allegations and Defense

Musk’s lawsuit accuses Altman and Brockman of breaching a charitable trust, unjust enrichment and other claims stemming from OpenAI’s transition to a capped-profit structure and its multibillion-dollar partnership with Microsoft. He argues he was misled when contributing early funding and resources, believing the organization would remain open-source and nonprofit.

Advertisement

OpenAI and Altman strongly deny the claims, portraying Musk’s suit as an attempt to hinder a competitor to his own xAI venture. They argue OpenAI’s evolution was necessary to attract talent and capital required to compete in the rapidly advancing AI field, and that Musk himself proposed for-profit elements in early discussions.

In a pretrial ruling last week, Judge Gonzalez Rogers dismissed Musk’s fraud claims at his own request to streamline the case, but allowed the core breach of charitable trust and unjust enrichment allegations to proceed to trial. Several other claims had been dismissed earlier.

High-Profile Witnesses Expected

The trial promises dramatic testimony from Silicon Valley’s biggest names. Musk, Altman, Brockman and Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella are all expected to take the stand. Former OpenAI executives, including onetime CTO Mira Murati, may also testify. The proceedings will delve into private emails, texts and founding documents that reveal the often messy personal and professional dynamics behind OpenAI’s creation in 2015.

Advertisement

Court filings already released have exposed colorful and sometimes unflattering details, including internal disagreements and strategic maneuvers. The case has captivated the tech world as a proxy battle for the soul of artificial intelligence development.

Broader Stakes for AI Industry

The outcome could have significant implications beyond the personal feud. A victory for Musk might force OpenAI to restructure or pay massive restitution, potentially slowing its commercial ambitions. A win for OpenAI would validate its current hybrid model and strengthen its position against rivals like xAI, Anthropic and Google.

Legal experts describe the case as complex, blending contract law, fiduciary duties and questions about charitable missions in rapidly evolving tech sectors. The nine-person jury will face the challenge of weighing technical details against broader ethical arguments about AI safety and profit motives.

Advertisement

History of the Feud

The dispute traces back to OpenAI’s founding, when Musk served as a co-founder and initial funder alongside Altman and others. Musk left the board in 2018 amid disagreements over direction and later launched xAI as a direct competitor focused on “understanding the universe.” He has repeatedly criticized OpenAI’s partnership with Microsoft and its closed-source approach.

This marks Musk’s latest attempt at litigation. Previous suits were withdrawn or partially dismissed, but the current federal case survived key challenges and is headed for a full jury trial.

Public and Industry Reaction

Advertisement

The trial has drawn intense media attention and social media commentary. Supporters of Musk view it as a stand against corporate capture of AI, while Altman’s backers see it as sour grapes from a rival. Tech executives are watching closely, with many expressing private concern about the precedent it could set for governance in fast-moving industries.

Both sides have spent heavily on legal teams, with high-powered attorneys on display in pretrial hearings. The case is expected to generate weeks of headlines as witnesses testify and private communications become public record.

What Happens Next

After jury selection, the trial moves quickly into substantive arguments. The schedule calls for court sessions Monday through Thursday, aiming to conclude the liability phase by mid-May. If the jury finds in Musk’s favor on any claims, Judge Gonzalez Rogers will then determine appropriate remedies in a separate phase.

Advertisement

Regardless of the final verdict, the proceedings are likely to expose more internal workings of OpenAI and the personal rivalries shaping the AI race. For Musk and Altman — two of the most influential figures in technology — the courtroom battle represents the culmination of years of public and private tension.

As jury selection continues Monday, all eyes in Silicon Valley and beyond remain fixed on the Oakland courthouse, where the future direction of one of the world’s most valuable and consequential companies may be decided.

Continue Reading

Business

Bristol-Myers Squibb: 'Strong Buy' As 2026 Milestones Could Bolster Its Prospects

Published

on

Bristol-Myers Squibb: 'Strong Buy' As 2026 Milestones Could Bolster Its Prospects

Bristol-Myers Squibb: 'Strong Buy' As 2026 Milestones Could Bolster Its Prospects

Continue Reading

Business

Stifel initiates HMH Holding stock with buy on offshore drilling outlook

Published

on


Stifel initiates HMH Holding stock with buy on offshore drilling outlook

Continue Reading

Business

(VIDEO) Sawe Shatters 2-Hour Barrier with Stunning 1:59:30 London Marathon Victory

Published

on

Luka Dončić

LONDON — Kenyan runner Sabastian Sawe made history Sunday by becoming the first athlete to break the two-hour marathon barrier in an official race, clocking an astonishing 1:59:30 to win the 2026 TCS London Marathon and etch his name permanently into the sport’s record books.

Sabastian Sawe
Sabastian Sawe

The 31-year-old defended his title on the fast, flat London course in ideal cool and calm conditions, surging away in the final miles to shatter the previous world record and deliver one of the greatest performances in distance running history. Ethiopia’s Yomif Kejelcha finished second in 1:59:41, while Uganda’s Jacob Kiplimo took third in 2:00:28 — producing the deepest men’s marathon field ever assembled.

“This is unbelievable. I came here to make history,” Sawe said moments after crossing the finish line on The Mall, his face a mix of exhaustion and pure joy. “The pacemakers were perfect, the crowd carried me. Running under two hours in a real race — this is something I dreamed about since I was a boy.”

Sawe’s performance eclipsed the previous world record of 2:00:35 set by the late Kelvin Kiptum in Chicago in 2023. It also bettered his own London course record from 2025. The victory marks his fifth consecutive marathon win and solidifies his status as the undisputed king of the distance.

Advertisement

Perfect Conditions Fuel Record Attempt

Organizers could not have asked for better weather. Temperatures hovered in the low 50s Fahrenheit with light winds — textbook conditions for fast times on the point-to-point course that starts in Blackheath and finishes in front of Buckingham Palace. More than 59,000 runners participated in the 46th edition of the world’s most iconic mass-participation marathon.

A large pack stayed together through the halfway mark in just over 59 minutes before accelerations began whittling it down. Sawe made his decisive move after 35 kilometers, dropping all but Kejelcha and Kiplimo. The final 7 kilometers became a masterclass in pacing and mental strength as Sawe pulled away to etch his name alongside legends like Eliud Kipchoge.

Advertisement

In the women’s race, Ethiopia’s Tigst Assefa defended her title in commanding fashion, clocking 2:15:41 to break her own women-only world record. Kenya’s Hellen Obiri took second in 2:15:53, with Joyciline Jepkosgei earning bronze in 2:15:55. All three dipped under 2:16, highlighting extraordinary depth on the women’s side.

A Meteoric Rise

Sawe’s journey from rural Kenya’s Rift Valley to marathon immortality has been remarkably swift. After excelling on the track and in half marathons, he made his full marathon debut in Valencia in 2024 with a stunning 2:02:05 — the second-fastest debut ever. He then won London in 2025 and Berlin later that year before delivering Sunday’s historic performance.

Trained by Italian coach Claudio Berardelli, Sawe blends traditional Kenyan high-altitude training with modern sports science. His tactical intelligence, devastating surges and mental toughness have become trademarks. Rivals now openly acknowledge he has raised the ceiling of what is possible in the marathon.

Advertisement

Significance of the Sub-2 Breakthrough

While exhibition races had previously seen times under two hours, Sawe’s 1:59:30 is the first ratified performance under the barrier in a legitimate competition with verified timing, doping controls and World Athletics rules. It validates years of progress in training methods, nutrition, shoe technology and pacing strategies.

Sports scientists say the achievement represents a new era. The psychological barrier of two hours had stood for decades. Sawe’s run proves human limits continue expanding, much as Roger Bannister’s sub-four-minute mile did in 1954.

British and Wheelchair Highlights

Advertisement

British interest centered on strong showings from home athletes. Mahamed Mahamed led the British men in 10th overall with 2:06:14, while Eilish McColgan was the top British woman in seventh. In the wheelchair races, Switzerland’s Catherine Debrunner claimed her fourth London title.

Looking Ahead

Sawe’s victory caps a remarkable rise and sets a new standard for the marathon. Eyes now turn to future Abbott World Marathon Majors and the Olympics. With his perfect record and the two-hour barrier broken, the Kenyan star appears poised for further dominance.

For the tens of thousands who ran London on Sunday, the day will be remembered as the moment the impossible became reality on one of running’s grandest stages. Sawe’s 1:59:30 run will be debated and celebrated for years to come — proof that barriers exist to be broken when talent, preparation and courage align perfectly.

Advertisement

As the sun set on The Mall and finishers continued streaming across the line, the 2026 London Marathon entered the history books as the day distance running took its boldest leap forward yet.

Continue Reading

Business

(VIDEO) Bayern Munich Stuns Mainz with Epic 4-3 Comeback from 3-0 Down

Published

on

Harry Kane scored yet again as Bayern Munich eased past Club Brugge

MAINZ, Germany — FC Bayern Munich produced one of the most remarkable comebacks of the 2025/26 Bundesliga season Sunday, storming back from a three-goal deficit to defeat 1. FSV Mainz 05 4-3 in a thrilling Matchday 31 encounter that showcased the champions’ never-say-die mentality.

Trailing 3-0 at halftime after goals from Dominik Kohr, Armindo Sieb (Nebel) and Sheraldo Becker, Bayern looked headed for a rare defeat. Instead, the Bavarians unleashed a devastating second-half response, with Nicolas Jackson pulling one back before Michael Olise, Jamal Musiala and Harry Kane delivered a dramatic turnaround in front of a stunned crowd at the MEWA Arena.

The victory keeps Bayern firmly on course in their title defense while dealing a severe blow to Mainz’s hopes of climbing the table. The match will be remembered as a classic Bundesliga thriller that highlighted both the attacking brilliance of the champions and the defensive vulnerabilities that occasionally surface even in dominant teams.

Advertisement

How the Comeback Unfolded

Mainz shocked the visitors with an aggressive start. Kohr opened the scoring in the 15th minute, capitalizing on a set piece. Nebel doubled the lead in the 29th minute with a clinical finish, and Becker made it 3-0 just before halftime, leaving Bayern coach Vincent Kompany with plenty to address during the break.

Whatever Kompany said at halftime clearly worked. Jackson gave Bayern hope with a goal shortly after the restart. Then Olise produced a moment of individual brilliance in the 73rd minute, curling a stunning strike into the top corner that reignited the comeback. Musiala leveled the score in the 80th minute with a composed finish, and Kane completed the remontada just three minutes later, slotting home the winner.

Bayern’s second-half performance was a masterclass in attacking football. The speed of their transitions, clinical finishing and relentless pressing overwhelmed a tiring Mainz side that had given everything in the first half.

Advertisement

Kompany’s Impact and Bayern’s Character

Since taking over, Kompany has instilled a winning mentality that refuses to accept defeat. This comeback victory — coming from three goals down — perfectly embodies that spirit. Players like Olise, Musiala and Kane showed why Bayern remains the benchmark in German football despite occasional wobbles.

Harry Kane, in particular, continues his remarkable form since joining from Tottenham. His winner took his Bundesliga tally even higher and reinforced his status as one of the world’s premier strikers. Musiala’s growing influence in midfield and Olise’s flair on the wing provided the creative spark the comeback required.

Mainz’s Valiant Effort

Advertisement

Despite the defeat, Mainz can take pride in their first-half display. They executed a perfect game plan early on, pressing high and exploiting spaces behind Bayern’s defense. For 45 minutes, they looked capable of a famous upset. The second-half collapse, however, exposed the gap in squad depth and experience against the league’s elite.

Broader Bundesliga Implications

The result keeps Bayern on top of the table as they chase another Meisterschale. With several games remaining, the champions appear determined to finish the season strongly. For Mainz, the loss adds pressure in their battle to avoid the lower reaches of the standings.

This match joins a growing list of memorable Bayern comebacks, echoing historic remontadas that have defined the club’s modern era. Fans on social media quickly dubbed it one of the season’s highlights, with clips of Olise’s wonder goal and Kane’s winner going viral within minutes of the final whistle.

Advertisement

What the Players Said

Post-match reactions captured the drama. Kompany praised his team’s character: “This is what we work for every day — the belief that we can turn any situation around.” Kane was more understated, simply saying, “We kept going, and it paid off.” Mainz coach Bo Svensson acknowledged the second-half dominance of Bayern but took positives from his side’s early performance.

Looking Ahead

Bayern now turns its focus to the remaining fixtures and a potential deep run in other competitions. Their ability to recover from difficult positions bodes well for the business end of the season. For Mainz, the task is to regroup quickly and secure vital points in the coming weeks.

Advertisement

Sunday’s match at the MEWA Arena will be remembered as a textbook example of Bundesliga entertainment — early shock, dramatic fightback and a result that reinforces Bayern’s status as the team to beat. As the 2025/26 season enters its final stretch, moments like this remind fans why the league remains one of the most exciting in world football.

Continue Reading

Business

Trade bodies say guaranteed hours under Employment Rights Act could threaten jobs

Published

on

Business Live

The British Retail Consortium, Food and Drink Federation, Recruitment and Employment Confederation, and UK Hospitality write to Government

A pint being poured

UK Hospitality signed the letter to Government(Image: PA)

Four trade bodies say proposals for guaranteed hours under the Employment Rights Act could threaten quality jobs.

Advertisement

The British Retail Consortium, Food and Drink Federation, Recruitment and Employment Confederation, and UK Hospitality jointly wrote to the Government warning that the measure could result in diminished opportunities and worse conditions for workers.

They put forward amendments to the policy which they believe would prevent “the double whammy of increasing unemployment and fewer young people entering the labour market”.

The letter stated: “Across our sectors, concern is deep and growing that the current approach risks stripping flexibility from the labour market at precisely the wrong moment.

“With demand already weakened, poorly designed guaranteed hours measures could become a tipping point, pushing employers to reduce hiring, limit hours or withdraw flexible roles altogether, denying work to those who need it most, or moving to less secure, more casual models of engagement.”

Advertisement

A Government spokesperson responded: “We will only achieve a thriving economy once people have a wage they can count on, which is why we’re giving greater certainty to over half the UK’s workforce through our Employment Rights Act.

“We will ensure people can have the security they need by giving eligible workers the right to guaranteed hours, and we will work closely with workers and employers on how the measures are implemented.”

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2025