This article was written by

Analyst’s Disclosure: I/we have a beneficial long position in the shares of PDI, JEPI, PDO, MLPI either through stock ownership, options, or other derivatives. I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it (other than from Seeking Alpha). I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.

BAD BEAT Investing and Quad 7 Capital offers research and writes opinion columns. By using our service you understand and acknowledge that there is a very high degree of risk involved in trading securities and, in particular, in trading options, including the entire loss of principal. Use of the service, our research columns, the chat service, and any other tools and the information contained herein is not intended to be a source of advice with respect to the material presented, and the information and/or documents contained in this website do not constitute investment advice. All users of the site are encouraged to consult with a personal financial advisor. No personal investment advice is being made, nor will be given. This content does not take into account your particular investment objectives, financial situation, or needs and is not intended as recommendations appropriate for you. You must make an independent decision regarding investments or strategies mentioned in this content. Before acting on information in this content, you should consider whether it is suitable for your particular circumstances and strongly consider seeking advice from your own financial or investment advisor. It does not take account of your objectives or your financial situation. You alone are solely responsible for determining whether any investment, security or strategy, or any other product or service, is appropriate or suitable for you based on your investment objectives and personal and financial situation and for evaluating the merits and risks.

Seeking Alpha’s Disclosure: Past performance is no guarantee of future results. No recommendation or advice is being given as to whether any investment is suitable for a particular investor. Any views or opinions expressed above may not reflect those of Seeking Alpha as a whole. Seeking Alpha is not a licensed securities dealer, broker or US investment adviser or investment bank. Our analysts are third party authors that include both professional investors and individual investors who may not be licensed or certified by any institute or regulatory body.

This article was written by

Analyst’s Disclosure: I/we have no stock, option or similar derivative position in any of the companies mentioned, and no plans to initiate any such positions within the next 72 hours. I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it (other than from Seeking Alpha). I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.

Seeking Alpha’s Disclosure: Past performance is no guarantee of future results. No recommendation or advice is being given as to whether any investment is suitable for a particular investor. Any views or opinions expressed above may not reflect those of Seeking Alpha as a whole. Seeking Alpha is not a licensed securities dealer, broker or US investment adviser or investment bank. Our analysts are third party authors that include both professional investors and individual investors who may not be licensed or certified by any institute or regulatory body.

This article was written by

A finance expert is urging investors to look beyond the artificial intelligence trade after a massive rally in technology stocks, arguing that future market gains may come from other areas of the economy.

UBS Managing Director and Senior Portfolio Manager Jason Katz joined FOX Business’ “Varney & Co.” host Stuart Varney to discuss market leadership, the outlook for consumers and where investors may find opportunities if enthusiasm around AI begins to cool.

Artificial intelligence has driven much of the stock market’s gains over the past several years as companies race to build data centers, expand computing capacity and develop new AI-powered products. The surge has helped lift major technology stocks and fuel broader optimism on Wall Street.

But Katz suggested investors may need to adjust expectations after the sector’s rapid run-up.

“AI has taken all the air out of the room, and with good reason,” Katz said. “But this rally is astounding. There isn’t a single cautionary tone or voice out there.”

HOW ETFS CAN BE EFFECTIVE BUILDING BLOCKS FOR RETIREES

While Katz said he is not predicting a major downturn, he noted that investors may be waiting for the next catalyst as markets assess factors, including energy prices and corporate earnings.

Katz pointed to consumer discretionary stocks as a potential area to watch, noting they have significantly lagged the broader market this year despite the importance of consumer spending to the U.S. economy.

The discussion comes as Americans continue to closely monitor fuel costs and other household expenses. Katz argued that lower oil prices could provide meaningful relief for consumers.

WORKERS FACE GROWING ‘AUTOMATION ANXIETY’ AS TECH LAYOFFS SURGE, AI ADOPTION ACCELERATES

“For every dollar that that consumer is not spending at the pump, she’s spending at shopping… Hopefully, we see the consumer step up to the plate, and we believe that will be the case.” Katz said.

GET FOX BUSINESS ON THE GO BY CLICKING HERE

PSU banks have just engineered a fundamental turnaround once deemed impossible, dragging net non-performing assets (NPAs) down to historic lows that match or beat their private sector peers. Yet, despite state-owned lenders hitting record profit milestones, market insiders are heavily shifting preference toward leading private sector banks. As the market transitions into a tougher macroeconomic environment marked by global uncertainty and intensifying deposit pressures, analysts caution that flocking to cheaper PSU stocks solely for their low valuations could backfire, pointing instead to larger private banks as the more compelling risk-reward play for FY27.

Citing superior earnings compounding potential and more attractive risk-reward dynamics at current valuations, analysts are explicitly tilting toward larger private sector banks.

Shrikant Chouhan, Head of Equity Research at Kotak Securities, highlights this tactical preference by stating that while the favorable operating momentum is likely to continue because they do not see any significant near-term fundamental headwinds, they currently prefer leading private sector banks since they offer a more attractive risk-reward profile at current valuations.

The record books

By every financial metric, FY26 was a watershed year for government-owned banks. Finance Ministry data shows aggregate PSU bank net profit rose 11.1% year-on-year to a historic high of ₹1.98 lakh crore, the fourth straight year of aggregate profitability for the sector. Gross advances grew 15.7% to ₹127 lakh crore, while aggregate deposits climbed 10.6% to ₹156.3 lakh crore, reflecting what the ministry described as continued depositor confidence and strong resource mobilisation.Asset quality, once the sector’s Achilles heel, has been transformed. The gross NPA ratio fell to 1.93% as of March 31, 2026, and the net NPA ratio to 0.39%, levels that now match or beat several private sector peers. Every single PSB maintained a provisioning coverage ratio above 90%. Fresh slippages continued to decline, with the slippage ratio at 0.7% for FY26, and total recoveries, including from written-off accounts, reached ₹86,971 crore.

What drove FY26 and why it may not repeat

Chouhan identifies two structural tailwinds that powered last year’s performance. First, PSU banks gained loan market share from private sector peers because they operated with lower credit-deposit ratios at a time when deposit growth was a key industry-wide constraint, giving them the balance sheet flexibility to grow their loan books faster. Second, substantial recoveries from legacy stressed assets provided a meaningful boost to profitability that supported both earnings growth and valuation re-rating across several PSU bank stocks.

But both tailwinds are now largely played out. There simply isn’t as much legacy stress left to recover from, and the deposit-ratio advantage has narrowed. “While the favourable operating momentum is likely to continue, as we do not see any significant near-term fundamental headwinds, we currently prefer leading private sector banks,” Chouhan says.

The earnings divergence that matters most

Motilal Oswal’s banking team lays out the starkest version of the divergence case. Over FY26–28, they project private banks to deliver earnings at roughly a 21% CAGR against just 8% for PSU banks, a gap of more than 2.5 times. Net interest income is expected to follow a similar split, with private banks delivering around a 17% CAGR against 13% for state-owned lenders. For the full banking coverage universe, Motilal Oswal estimates a 15% earnings CAGR over the period, modestly ahead of consensus expectations of 14%. Their top picks for the cycle: ICICI Bank, HDFC Bank, State Bank of India, and AU Small Finance Bank. SBI is the only PSU bank to make the cut.
Among private banks, Motilal Oswal expects mid-sized players to outperform on earnings, supported by improving net interest margins, easing stress in unsecured portfolios, and relatively stable credit costs driven by better asset quality trends.

The NIM problem

Elara Securities’ Prakhar Agarwal flags one of the sector’s most pressing structural concerns heading into FY27: the erosion of low-cost current and savings account deposits. “Sustained pressure points on low-cost deposits mean incremental growth will be funded by retail term and wholesale deposits, which will have pressure points on spreads,” he says. Some banks have already raised deposit rates, and incremental spreads are narrowing.

Agarwal argues that FY27 will favour banks with strong liability franchises and robust balance sheets. Large private banks with mid-teen returns on equity are best positioned to compound earnings even without a valuation re-rating. For smaller, less differentiated lenders, the combination of geopolitical uncertainty, margin compression, and tighter deposit competition could prove a difficult test. “Given near-term uncertainty, we prefer larger private banks with mid-teen ROE, justifying a case for earnings compounding if not for valuation re-rating,” he says.

Axis Direct’s Dnyanada Vaidya stops short of writing off the PSU bank space entirely. Most larger government-owned banks have maintained a 1% return on assets, a threshold that has historically supported strong stock performance, and the asset quality outlook remains constructive with no visible headwinds to credit costs. “Over the medium term, we expect PSU banks to replicate the performance of larger private banks on credit growth, while maintaining stable loan-to-deposit ratios,” she says.

But she flags the same NIM headwind: with the cost of funds having bottomed and the Reserve Bank’s rate-cut cycle underway, margin pressure is likely to persist near-term. Banks will need to reprice select lending segments to offset the squeeze, a process that takes time and carries execution risk. Her preference within the PSU space: SBI, and SBI alone.

(Disclaimer: Recommendations, suggestions, views and opinions given by the experts are their own. These do not represent the views of The Economic Times)

JPMorgan Chase Chairman and CEO Jamie Dimon issued an unfiltered, aggressive warning against a new crypto-friendly bill moving through Congress while also targeting Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong’s multimillion-dollar lobbying push.

In a wide-ranging interview with FOX Business’ Maria Bartiromo on Friday, Dimon was asked for his thoughts on the CLARITY Act, which aims to establish clear regulatory guidelines in the U.S. for digital assets and stablecoins.

Dimon then rejected Coinbase’s messaging that its lobbying represents broad consumer interests, promising an all-out industry “fight” on Capitol Hill.

“We’ll fight it. If we lose, we lose and we’ll live,” Dimon said. “But it will be fought… No one’s going to bow down to this guy, OK? Or that company… And he’s spending hundreds of millions of dollars… He’s full of s–t.”

JAMIE DIMON REVEALS WHAT HE TOLD MAMDANI AFTER PRIVATE MEETING, SAYS IDEOLOGY CAN LEAD MAYORS TO FAIL

“Just be fair. If he takes deposits like a bank, he should have bank rules. We have social requirements, litigation, legal liquidity requirements, capital requirements, AML requirements, financial reporting requirements, transparency requirements,” he continued. “If he wants to be a bank, be a bank. That’s all it is.”

Dimon argued that if crypto platforms want to act like banks and take customer deposits, they must play by the exact same rules.

“And they’re not FDIC-insured. We have requirements to build branches in lower-income neighborhoods… We have like 84 regulators all over us. We’re just saying it should be fair and equal, period. Not that they can’t do what they want to do,” Dimon said. “If you want to buy cryptocurrency, be my guest. You know, I believe it’s a free country, and I defend that right. But we just want it to be fair.”

When asked if he’s “happy” with the legislative language of the CLARITY Act, Dimon responded: “No, because it allows them to effectively pay interest on deposits, stablecoins or something like that, without the protection that they should have… it has almost no legal protections. So no, the banks will not accept it that way.”

Coinbase did not immediately respond to Fox News Digital’s request for comment.

GET FOX BUSINESS ON THE GO BY CLICKING HERE

The CEO of America’s largest bank also warned that decentralized crypto networks risk becoming a preferred pipeline for cartels and human traffickers if Washington doesn’t enforce strict oversight.

“I do think it will be used for cross-border payments, small dollar payments, you know, for person-to-person [transactions],” Dimon said. “Remember, once that money’s in a wallet overseas, it could be in anyone’s wallet. And it goes to a third wallet, a fourth wallet. So the first one may be legitimate, [the] second one may be a sex trafficker. So, you know, it’s complicated and the government needs to do it thoughtfully. If they don’t do it thoughtfully… it’ll be a huge problem.”

READ MORE FROM FOX BUSINESS