Connect with us
DAPA Banner
DAPA Coin
DAPA
COIN PAYMENT ASSET
PRIVACY · BLOCKDAG · HOMOMORPHIC ENCRYPTION · RUST
ElGamal Encrypted MINE DAPA
🚫 GENESIS SOLD OUT
DAPAPAY COMING

Crypto World

Bitcoin-backed loans belong in the cost-of-capital conversation

Published

on

Chart: Cost of capital comparison across common debt types

Welcome to our institutional newsletter, Crypto Long & Short. This week:

  • Alec Beckman on why BTC-backed lending is not a crypto story, but a capital efficiency story.
  • Serena Sebastiani on how stablecoins aren’t a crypto product; they’re becoming the settlement infrastructure global finance forgot.
  • Top headlines institutions should pay attention to by Francisco Rodrigues.
  • “Ethena’s Solana lending markets cross $1B in 4 days” in Chart of the Week.

Thanks for joining us!

-Alexandra Levis


Expert Insights

Bitcoin-backed loans belong in the cost-of-capital conversation

By Alec Beckman, VP of the Americas, Psalion

Advertisement

The argument is not about whether to buy bitcoin or not. It is for advisors, real estate investors, small business owners and founders who already own it, or work with clients who do. The practical question is simple: if a client carries meaningful debt, why is BTC-backed lending not in the capital stack discussion? Debt-heavy professionals already compare collateral, rate, fees, speed and covenants. Bitcoin-backed loans should be evaluated the same way.

The debt menu is familiar. HELOCs are tied to home equity, often variable, and currently sit above 7% for many borrowers. Hard money and bridge loans can move quickly, but often price around 10% to 14% plus points. Securities-based lending can be efficient, but rates often begin around 6% to 8% and require sizable brokerage assets in one place. Personal loans frequently land in the low-to-mid teens. SBA loans can be useful, but the all-in cost, documentation and time to fund are not trivial.

Chart: Cost of capital comparison across common debt types

Bitcoin-backed lending changes the collateral, not the math. The borrower pledges BTC, receives dollars or stablecoins and repays under agreed terms. The asset is liquid, verifiable and easy to monitor. Market rates still vary widely, but more competitive structures are emerging. At Psalion, for example, we facilitate access to Bitcoin-backed loans at a 5.5% fixed rate, up to 60% LTV, with a 0.5% origination fee. That is one data point, but it shows why the category belongs in a serious debt comparison.

Rate matters first. For someone already holding BTC, the relevant question is not “Should I borrow?” It is “Where should I borrow?” Against a house? A business? A securities portfolio? Or BTC? If BTC collateral produces cheaper capital than the borrower’s existing debt, it can reduce the blended cost of capital.

Fees matter next. Hard money can carry points on origination. SBA structures can include guarantee fees, closing costs and advisory costs. Personal loans may embed higher APR through origination. Lower fee bitcoin-backed lending can make the all-in economics materially cleaner.

Advertisement

Friction matters too. Traditional credit often requires income verification, tax returns, appraisals, operating statements, personal guarantees, covenants and time. BTC-backed lending is collateral-first. The collateral can be verified quickly and monitored continuously. Faster access to liquidity is not just convenience. It can change the economics of a refinance, acquisition, tax payment or bridge need.

Advisors should care because BTC is now part of more client balance sheets. Too often, BTC sits idle while the same client pays higher rates elsewhere. If the client can borrow against BTC and replace more expensive debt, the advisor has improved the balance sheet without forcing a sale and potentially creating a taxable gain.

There is a second use case: yield on spread. Some real estate investors, founders and business owners see opportunities where expected returns exceed their cost of capital, such as private credit, commercial real estate lending, inventory or operating expansion.

Chart: How Bitcoin-backed debt improves the balance sheet

Borrowing against BTC to pursue those opportunities can make sense when the borrower understands both sides of the trade: the yield opportunity and the collateral risk.

That risk is real. Bitcoin is volatile. If the price falls enough, LTV can breach agreed thresholds and trigger margin calls or liquidation. Liquidation can create a taxable event. This is not for every client. It is for borrowers who understand BTC volatility, maintain liquidity and size loans conservatively below maximum LTV.

Advertisement

For clients who already own bitcoin and already carry debt, BTC-backed lending is not a crypto story. It is a capital efficiency story. Ignoring it may mean leaving cheaper capital, or a valuable spread opportunity, on the table.


Principled Perspectives

Stablecoins are now infrastructures

By Serena Sebastiani, chief strategy officer and head of government and regulatory affairs, Fuze

There’s a kind of financial friction that becomes invisible when you live inside it long enough.

Advertisement

From New York or London, cross-border payments work. From Nairobi, Jakarta or Almaty, they don’t.

An SME in Nairobi pays a supplier in Karachi. The money leaves Monday. It arrives Thursday. Along the way it passes through two correspondent banks, absorbs fees on both ends, gets hit with an FX spread on the USD conversion and triggers multiple compliance checks. Both the buyer and the supplier absorb the friction by pricing it into the deal and extending the credit note.

This is how it actually works to operate across the fastest-growing trade corridors globally: Gulf to South Asia, intra-African trade, CIS to MENA, and Southeast Asia remittances.

Multiply that by the $136 billion SME trade finance gap in Africa alone. Multiply it by the $100 billion in annual remittances flowing into the continent. Multiply it across the Gulf-to-South-Asia corridor, CIS-to-MENA and intra-ASEAN. And also account for the cost of sending money into Sub-Saharan Africa, which remains the most expensive region in the world, at 8.3% on average (almost three times the UN’s 3% target). In live corridors today, stablecoin rails are already operating at under 1%. What we’re looking at is not simply a matter of optimizing the margins, but a structural gap in the fastest-growing regions of the global economy.

Advertisement

SWIFT was built for a specific world: large banks, large tickets and major financial centres. It works perfectly for that world. Yet the supplier payment in Nairobi, the remittance from Riyadh to Manila, or the trade settlement between Almaty and Istanbul has been making do with infrastructure designed for someone else’s economy.

That’s the gap stablecoins are moving into, and they’re not a product but real plumbing.

Chart: The Remittance Cost Gap

Chart 1: The Remittance Cost Gap

Sources: World Bank (Q1 2025); UN SDG 10.c; Transak / Operational corridor data

What we observe from the ground

Advertisement

I spent time with regulators and market operators across high-growth corridors and a pattern that emerges is that people closest to the friction are the least ideological about the solution. They are the ones actually trying to integrate stablecoins into the existing financial system.

In Kigali for example, the framing isn’t “crypto adoption.” Rwanda’s National Bank launched a CBDC pilot in February with cross-border interoperability as the explicit design priority. A draft Virtual Assets Law now in parliament applies a clean two-tier structure: Central Bank oversight for payment stablecoins and Capital Markets Authority for investment instruments. A fintech license passporting agreement with Kenya, signed in March, is already being designed as a template for the East African Community. This is regulatory infrastructure being built with precision, for a specific problem, by people who understand their own market.

The insight is not Rwanda-specific, but Africa-wide, where mobile money already functions as the default financial layer. With over a billion registered accounts, 96% financial inclusion in markets like Rwanda, this distribution infrastructure took decades to build. What mobile money never solved for is cross-border interoperability. Stablecoins fit that gap naturally, not replacing fiat currencies, but acting as the settlement layer that makes mobile money efficient.

The same logic, four corridors

Advertisement

Middle East

The Central Bank of UAE’s Payment Token Services Regulation treats stablecoins as settlement infrastructure rather than speculative securities. That regulatory framing is practical and allows banks to issue AED stablecoins that can be used directly as a means of payment, and banks and licensed fintechs can build on stablecoin rails without treating every transaction as a liability. In this way, the Gulf stablecoin settlement is happening inside regulated perimeters.

CIS markets

In Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan and Georgia, the driver is dollar access. Domestic currency volatility creates structural demand for USD, and formal banking doesn’t reliably provide them. Stablecoin adoption here is dollarization leveraging a new distribution channel. The institutional opportunity is providing that access inside a compliance framework, with the custody and reserve standards that make it durable.

Advertisement

Southeast Asia

In Southeast Asia, the driver is cost and speed. In corridors like Gulf-Indonesia or Gulf-Philippines for remittances, stablecoin rails eliminate the need for pre-funding and speed up settlement from days to minutes (often under 20 minutes, 24/7). Cost reductions of 40–80% are already observable in operational flows.

I engaged with regulators, banks and fintechs in these markets. The question here is: how can we facilitate higher volumes on stablecoin rails and give back to the households?

Africa

Advertisement

Remittances are expensive, but the B2B case is urgent as well. Intra-African trade only accounts for 16% of total trade, against 68% for Europe and 59% for Asia. The AfCFTA created the legal architecture for a $3.4 trillion market, but the payment infrastructure hasn’t kept up. Chinese traders sourcing African goods are already settling in USDT because it is superior for their transaction sizes and timelines. To make this properly institutional and largely adopted, the essence is to guarantee that the activity happens compliantly, with proper rails.

Chart: Intra-Regional Trade Share — Africa vs Peers

Chart 2: Intra-Regional Trade Share — Africa vs Peers

Sources: UNCTAD / AfDB / WTO; World Bank / African Union (AfCFTA projection)

Stablecoins are infrastructure

Global banks and fintechs are still largely approaching stablecoins as a product to distribute to customers. The more significant opportunity is treating them as infrastructure to build on, particularly in remittances and B2B payment flows: treasury management, supplier payments and FX settlement. These are flows where the speed improvement and cost reduction are measurable (minutes vs days, basis points), and where the compliance trails on well-designed digital rails are demonstrable and trackable. These include on-chain transaction monitoring, wallet attribution and automated regulatory reporting that produces a compliance record that informal transfer channels structurally cannot. The data generated by these rails is what gets correspondent banking relationships restored in markets where de-risking has cut them.

Advertisement

Solving the friction

What remains to be solved for the infrastructure to properly work at scale? Regulatory frameworks that define reserve standards and redemption rights, cross-border supervisory coordination and AML/CFT laws interoperability.

All this is being worked through, and more in the market that matters (high-growth) than in established developed countries.

From experience working with regulators and now proactively engaging with them, I learned that the pattern that works is: 1. A phased licensing framework that lets regulators learn alongside the market; 2. Proportionate requirements scaled to institutional size and risk profile; 3. Bilateral passporting agreements that make compliance portable across corridors.

Advertisement

The corridors where this infrastructure is most needed are not waiting for global standards to arrive but are actively building. The question for global institutions is whether they’re part of that architecture or arriving late to fintech-leading infrastructure.


Headlines of the Week

Francisco Rodrigues

This week’s headlines show structural progress on Wall Street’s onchain push, with a market-structure bill clearing its biggest hurdle, JPMorgan extending its tokenization stack, and asset managers tackling the redemption-speed problem. Solana has meanwhile kept quietly cementing its infrastructure for institutional use.

Advertisement

Chart of the Week

Ethena’s Solana lending markets cross $1B in 4 days

Combined USDe and USDG supply across the Bitwise-curated Jupiter Lend market and the Kamino Ethena market rose from $401M on launch day (May 12) to $1.06B on May 16 – driven almost entirely by looper-led growth on Jupiter Lend, where supply climbed from $201M to $812M while Kamino’s Ethena Prime vault held steady around $250M.

Chart: Ethena's Solana lending markets cross $1B in 4 days

Listen. Read. Watch. Engage.

Looking for more? Receive the latest crypto news from coindesk.com and market updates from coindesk.com/institutions.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Crypto World

Kraken, Coinbase User Hit by $6.7M Crypto Theft and Laundering

Published

on

Brian Armstrong's Bold Prediction: AI Agents Will Soon Dominate Global Financial

TLDR

  • A Kraken and Coinbase user lost about $6.7 million after attackers drained crypto from both exchange accounts.
  • The stolen assets included Ethereum, Bitcoin, and cbBTC withdrawn in a short and coordinated series of transactions.
  • On-chain analyst Specter traced the stolen funds to new wallet addresses across the Ethereum and Bitcoin networks.
  • Attackers moved about $5.3 million of the stolen crypto through Tornado Cash to obscure transaction trails.
  • Early reports suggested a physical attack, but later analysis indicated no evidence of coercion.
  • The method used to access the victim’s exchange accounts has not been confirmed.

A crypto user has lost about $6.7 million after attackers drained accounts linked to Kraken and Coinbase. The stolen assets included Ethereum, Bitcoin, and cbBTC, according to blockchain tracking data. The incident involving Kraken has raised fresh concerns about exchange account security and targeted attacks.

Kraken Account Drained Alongside Coinbase Holdings

Attackers withdrew large amounts of crypto from the victim’s accounts within a short period. The activity affected both Kraken and Coinbase balances simultaneously.

On-chain analyst Specter reported that 1,554 ETH, worth about $3.3 million, left the Kraken account. The attackers also withdrew 10.5 BTC during the same period.

At the same time, the Coinbase account saw withdrawals of 34.1 cbBTC worth roughly $2.6 million. These movements occurred quickly and followed a coordinated pattern.

Specter tracked the stolen funds to newly identified wallet addresses on Ethereum and Bitcoin networks. The analyst shared that the assets moved rapidly after the initial withdrawals.

Early reports suggested a possible physical attack on the account holder. However, Specter later stated the case likely did not involve physical coercion.

Advertisement

The exact method used to access the accounts remains unclear at this stage. No official statement from Kraken or Coinbase has detailed the breach vector.

Stolen Crypto Moves Through Tornado Cash

Blockchain data shows that attackers began laundering funds shortly after the theft. They routed a large portion through Tornado Cash, a privacy mixer on Ethereum.

Specter said about $5.3 million had already passed through Tornado Cash. The transfers occurred in multiple transactions to obscure tracking.

The use of mixers complicates efforts to trace stolen crypto across the blockchain. Investigators often face delays when funds move through such services.

Advertisement

The case adds to ongoing reports of phishing and malware targeting exchange users. Attackers often exploit compromised credentials to gain account access.

Kraken and Coinbase both offer two-factor authentication and withdrawal protection features. However, advanced attacks continue to bypass these safeguards in some cases.

Security experts advise users to enable all available protections and monitor account activity closely. They also recommend avoiding suspicious links and unknown software.

As of the latest update, the stolen funds remain in circulation after passing through Tornado Cash. Authorities and analysts continue to track related wallet activity.

Advertisement

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Crypto World

Market Spotlight: Nvidia (NVDA) Earnings, ASML Rally, Strategy (MSTR) Target Hike, and Target’s (TGT) Strong Quarter

Published

on

Brian Armstrong's Bold Prediction: AI Agents Will Soon Dominate Global Financial

Market Summary

  • Nvidia releases quarterly results after market close, with Wall Street projecting $1.78 EPS and $79.2B revenue—representing roughly 80% annual growth
  • Market veteran Jim Cramer noted Nvidia’s historical pattern of post-earnings rallies followed by sustained selling pressure from profit-taking
  • ASML shares climbed 6.7% following UBS naming it the leading European semiconductor stock with a €1,900 price objective
  • Strategy received a $400 price target upgrade from TD Cowen, maintaining Buy status with upside potential exceeding 140%
  • Target surpassed earnings projections with $1.71 EPS compared to $1.46 consensus, while boosting annual sales outlook

Nvidia: Market’s Most Anticipated Quarterly Report

[[LINK_START_0]]Nvidia[[LINK_END_0]] commands unprecedented attention as traders await its quarterly disclosure following today’s closing bell. The artificial intelligence semiconductor giant faces elevated expectations from the investment community.

Wall Street consensus points to approximately $1.78 in per-share earnings alongside roughly $79.2 billion in total revenue. These figures would mark year-over-year revenue expansion approaching 80%.

The data-center segment represents the critical metric investors will scrutinize. Demand for AI-focused processors from hyperscale cloud providers, artificial intelligence research firms, and major corporations has fueled Nvidia’s explosive expansion over recent reporting periods.

Market participants are particularly focused on several key areas: gross profit margins, order momentum for Blackwell architecture chips, ramifications of expanded China export controls, and forward guidance projections.

Can Strong Results Sustain Upward Momentum?

Jim Cramer highlighted a recurring trend worth monitoring. He observed that Nvidia’s earnings track record frequently features immediate post-announcement gains, subsequently followed by persistent selling waves as traders capitalize on strength.

Advertisement

His analysis suggests that even exceptional results might fail to propel shares higher when market expectations already price in near-perfection.

Competitive dynamics remain front and center for investors. Custom silicon initiatives from major cloud platforms, AMD’s growing presence, and proprietary chip development by technology giants all factor into market calculations.

Should Nvidia provide robust forward guidance while effectively addressing concerns surrounding Chinese market access and margin sustainability, the broader AI investment thesis could receive validation. Conversely, post-results weakness might ripple across semiconductor stocks and technology-heavy indexes.


ASML: European Chip Leader Rallies on Analyst Endorsement

ASML advanced 6.7% after UBS designated the company as its premier European semiconductor selection. The firm elevated its price objective to €1,900 from €1,600.

Advertisement

UBS anticipates ASML’s earnings performance will consistently exceed consensus forecasts extending through 2027 and 2028, propelled by sustained demand for cutting-edge semiconductor manufacturing equipment.

ASML’s Central Role in AI Infrastructure

ASML manufactures extreme ultraviolet lithography systems, which represent indispensable technology for fabricating the world’s most sophisticated processors. Without these specialized machines, chipmakers cannot produce the advanced semiconductors required for AI computing.

Escalating artificial intelligence demand translates to chipmakers requiring expanded manufacturing capacity. This dynamic positions ASML at the strategic center of global semiconductor production infrastructure.

The substantial 6.7% price movement demonstrates investors recognize opportunities beyond domestic AI chip manufacturers. Capital is flowing toward the comprehensive international supply chain enabling chip production.

Advertisement

Strategy: TD Cowen Maintains Optimistic Bitcoin Treasury Stance

Strategy captured market attention following TD Cowen’s price target elevation to $400 from $395 while maintaining Buy guidance. This projection suggests upside potential surpassing 140% from previous closing levels.

Strategy maintains substantial Bitcoin reserves and employs leverage combined with capital-raising activities to expand its cryptocurrency holdings. While the company retains its software operations, market valuation primarily reflects its Bitcoin treasury position.

Substantial Upside Accompanied by Elevated Volatility

TD Cowen’s upgraded outlook reflects conviction in Strategy’s Bitcoin accumulation strategy. However, the equity remains among the market’s most volatile instruments.

Bitcoin price declines typically trigger sharp Strategy share drops. Conversely, cryptocurrency rallies tend to attract aggressive momentum purchasing activity.

Advertisement

For market participants seeking leveraged Bitcoin exposure through traditional equity markets, Strategy continues commanding significant attention.


Target: Results Exceed Expectations Amid Lingering Investor Skepticism

Target disclosed first-quarter adjusted earnings reaching $1.71 per share, surpassing the $1.46 Wall Street estimate. Revenue totaled $25.44 billion, exceeding the $24.66 billion projection.

Comparable sales metrics showed improvement, supported by increased customer traffic. Target additionally raised its full-year sales growth guidance, suggesting its operational turnaround strategy may be generating positive momentum.

Tempered Market Response Despite Quarterly Beat

Notwithstanding the earnings beat, share price reaction proved subdued. Investors maintain caution regarding consumer spending durability and whether Target’s first-quarter momentum can persist throughout the fiscal year.

Advertisement

Profit margins and broader retail sector headwinds remain focal concerns. A single strong quarterly performance proves insufficient to completely restore investor confidence following an extended challenging period for the retailer.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Crypto World

Ethereum Price Risks Falling to $1K Next, Analysts Warn

Published

on

Ethereum Price Risks Falling to $1K Next, Analysts Warn

Market analysts say Ether’s (ETH) price may drop to $1,000 if a breakdown from a bearish chart pattern is confirmed.

Key takeaways:

  • Ether’s bear flag targets 50% ETH price drop to $1,075. 
  • Ether risks over $1.70 billion in long liquidations if the price breaks below $2,000.
  • Whale accumulation weakens as major ETH holders reduce exposure.

Ether’s bear flag targets $1,000 ETH price

Ether’s downtrend could accelerate if the price breaks below the lower trend line of a bear flag at $2,000 on the daily chart, where a similar breakdown in January led to a 41.5% ETH price drop.

Related: Ether taker volume turns negative for first time in two months: Will ETH fall under $2K next?

A bear flag pattern is a bearish continuation setup that forms after the price consolidates inside an up-sloping channel following a sharp price drop.

Advertisement

The measured target of the flag, derived from the previous downtrend’s height added to the breakdown point at $2,000, is $1,075, down 49% from the current price.

ETH/USD weekly chart. Source: Cointelegraph/TradingView

“$ETH is about to break the bear flag pattern,” analyst Coin Signals said in a Monday post on X, adding that if the price fails to hold above the lower trend line at 2,000, a “sell-off to $1800 or a new low” would follow.

Fellow analyst Keith Alan told his followers to be “prepared for the nasty scenario,” involving the confirmation of a death cross between the 21-day simple moving average (SMA) and 50-day SMA, and validation of a bear flag in the daily time frame.

Advertisement

“Momentum indicators also show deterioration on both daily and weekly RSI timeframes,” the analyst said in a recent article on X.

“Failure to establish support, however, opens the door to a sequence of progressively lower technical support levels” toward the measured target of the bear flag structure around $1,300, he added.

ETH/USD daily chart. Source: X/Keith Alan

Fellow analyst Crypto Patel said that ETH’s validation of a rising wedge pattern was underway, with a downside target of $1,500.

Advertisement

“Ethereum has lost a key rising trendline. As long as the price stays below it, weakness can continue.”

ETH/USD daily chart. Source: X/Crypto Patel

Meanwhile, Ethereum’s liquidation map shows that a correction below $2,000 would trigger over $1.70 billion worth of leveraged long ETH liquidations across all exchanges, according to CoinGlass data.

ETH exchange liquidation map. Source: CoinGlass

Ethereum whale accumulation drops

Ether’s latest rebound to $2,400 did not trigger broad-based accumulation across major wallet cohorts, Glassnode data showed.

Advertisement

For instance, the number of mega-whale wallets holding more than 10,000 ETH has declined sharply to a 10-month low of 1,050, with the 30-day change dropping to as low as -70, levels last seen in early February.

Ethereum mega-whale address count balance (>10K ETH). Source: Glassnode

In other words, large players are taking advantage of recent liquidity to de-risk, reflecting a lack of mid-term confidence.

The picture looks similar among smaller wallet cohorts.

Advertisement

Ethereum wallets holding 1,000 to 10,000 ETH have also been declining, falling to a nine-month low of 4,750 on May 8. The 30-day change remains negative, hovering around -50 at the time of writing.

Ethereum whale and shark address count balance. Source: Glassnode

Taken together, the data suggest ongoing distribution and weak conviction across key ETH holder cohorts, reinforcing the risk of a deeper drop if $2,000 breaks.

This reduction in whale counts aligns with the recent inflows into exchanges, indicating the path of least resistance remains down in the immediate future and selling pressure mounts.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Crypto World

EU Launches MiCA Crypto Rules Review as Key Negotiator Urges More Proportionality

Published

on

EU Launches MiCA Crypto Rules Review as Key Negotiator Urges More Proportionality

The European Commission opened a consultation on May 20 about the EU’s Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation (MiCA). The review asks the public and industry how the rules are performing nearly two years after rollout.

Stakeholders have until August 31 to submit feedback. Brussels will weigh the responses against shifting digital asset markets and competing global regulators.

What the MiCA Review Will Examine

MiCA, in force since 2024, was the first comprehensive crypto framework adopted by a major jurisdiction. It established harmonized rules for asset-referenced tokens, e-money tokens, and crypto-asset service providers across all 27 member states.

The Commission wants to assess whether the framework still fits a fast-changing sector. The consultation has a public track for individuals and a technical track for issuers, exchanges, banks, and policy bodies.

Advertisement

Stablecoins remain the most contested element. Industry tracking shows close to 30 approved fiat-backed tokens under the rules.

The parallel category for asset-referenced tokens has yet to clear a single product.

Global Pressure Builds for MiCA Updates

The review arrives as the EU faces accelerating moves in Washington and Asia. US lawmakers advanced the GENIUS Act stablecoin bill last year.

The push prompted European Central Bank President Christine Lagarde to publicly back a euro stablecoin response.

Advertisement

European banks are preparing a MiCAR-compliant euro stablecoin for 2026. Smaller crypto firms argue compliance costs are pushing activity toward more flexible jurisdictions.

Germany and the Netherlands are seen as the strictest enforcers.

Subscribe to our YouTube channel to watch leaders and journalists provide expert insights

“We should not treat in the same way the global trade crypto exchanges coming from the US and listed on the US stock exchange market with the same rules that we treat a small startup company running a crypto business,” Ondřej Kovařík told BeInCrypto.

According to Kovařík, there should be two additional fixes:

Advertisement
  • MiCA’s stablecoin rules are too strict for European issuers, he argued, leaving the market dominated by US dollar tokens.
  • The framework should also add provisions to recognize equivalent regimes from countries such as the UK or Switzerland.

Kovařík was Renew Europe’s shadow rapporteur on MiCA, making him one of the key architects of the world’s first comprehensive crypto regulatory framework.

He also maintains memberships with the European Parliament (representing the Czech Republic) and the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs.

The August deadline gives Brussels a narrow window to gather positions before any legislative proposal.

Minor technical fixes or a broader MiCA 2 effort could follow. The outcome will shape the EU’s competitiveness in digital asset rulemaking.

The post EU Launches MiCA Crypto Rules Review as Key Negotiator Urges More Proportionality appeared first on BeInCrypto.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Crypto World

ETH Insider Explains Wave of 2026 Ethereum Foundation Departures

Published

on

A long-time Ethereum investor and community figure has pushed back against growing alarm over the string of departures from the Ethereum Foundation (EF), arguing that the organization’s commitment to the network is as firm as ever.

Ryan Berckmans, who has worked full-time in the Ethereum space for eight years, offered one of the more detailed community-level defenses of the EF’s current direction since the exits started mounting this year.

Departures Caused by Differences of Opinion

According to Berckmans, people are misreading the situation.

“The EF departures are not because the people departing feel differently about Ethereum and our trajectory vs. the people staying at EF or vs. community folks like me,” he wrote.

What actually drove them, in his view, was a mix of internal disagreements over sub-strategies rather than any loss of faith in Ethereum itself, plus a deliberate generational shift.

Advertisement

“Some folks disagreed. Some tiny number were asked to leave for Reasons. Some few others left immediately due to Reasonable Net Feelings. Some more are leaving because the Wheel is Turning,” he explained.

Further, Berckmans added that new, younger contributors are ready to step into leadership across teams and departments. He also addressed a persistent piece of community frustration, that the EF and Vitalik Buterin do not care about ETH’s price, calling it a misconception.

According to him, they care deeply, but across a much longer time horizon than most community members track.

“They want to know, ‘How will Ethereum remain dominant after quantum computers?’ and, ‘How will Ethereum be the world’s economic hub for trillions in assets and thousands of L2s across a hundred countries?’”

His conclusion was that these are questions that can only get asked if you believe the outcome is achievable, and the EF’s programs in response to them are “gigabullish.”

Four Prominent Contributors Left in Just Four Weeks

The wave of exits has included Carl Beek, Julian Ma, Barnabé Monnot, Tim Beiko, Trent Van Epps, Josh Stark, and former co-Executive Director Tomasz Stańczak.

Advertisement

Stańczak’s departure, in particular, drew quite a lot of attention, considering that it came just 11 months after he’d taken the role. In addition, the exits have been concentrated, with four of the more prominent ones landing within roughly four weeks of each other in April and May.

Meanwhile, a detailed analysis by crypto researcher Nick Sawinyh pointed to unconfirmed claims circulating online that staff were asked to formally align with the Foundation’s new mandate. However, the EF has not publicly confirmed those claims, and none of the departing contributors cited the mandate as their reason for leaving.

People are also focusing on the coming Glamsterdam upgrade to Ethereum that is still under test. The protocol update includes changes tied to scaling and validator infrastructure, although some anticipated features, including FOCIL and native account abstraction, have already been delayed to a later upgrade cycle.

Despite this, many Ethereum backers believe that the entire ecosystem can now take leadership changes in stride without posing a risk to the network as a whole. One of them, author William Mougayar, described the Foundation’s shrinking role as a deliberate attempt to remove Ethereum’s remaining central point of control rather than a sign of institutional decline.

Advertisement

The post ETH Insider Explains Wave of 2026 Ethereum Foundation Departures appeared first on CryptoPotato.

Source link

Continue Reading

Crypto World

1 Quadrillion MAPO Minted: Bridge Exploit Crashes Token

Published

on

MAP Protocol (MAPO) Price Performance

MAP Protocol’s Butter Bridge suffered a severe exploit on May 20, 2026, with attackers minting 1,000,000,000,000,000 MAPO tokens, roughly 4.8 million times the legitimate circulating supply of approximately 208 million.

The MAP Protocol token has fallen over nearly 30% in the immediate aftermath.

MAP Protocol Hit by 1 Quadrillion Token Mint

Security firms PeckShield raised immediate alarms, highlighting a vulnerability in Butter Bridge V3.1’s OmniServiceProxy contract that allowed unauthorized minting on Ethereum and BSC.

Follow us on X to get the latest news as it happens

The attacker triggered the mint via a spoofed cross-chain message on the Butter Bridge, directing 1 quadrillion MAPO from the zero address to wallet address 0x40592025392BD7d7463711c6E82Ed34241B64279.

On-chain data shows the exploiter swapped portions of the fake supply, extracting approximately 52.2 ETH (~$110,000) and pulling over $180,000 in liquidity from Uniswap pools before the price collapsed.

Most of the inflated tokens remain in the attacker’s wallet.

Advertisement

This incident adds to a troubling 2026 trend: PeckShield has tracked multiple bridge exploits draining hundreds of millions across DeFi this year.

Market Impact: MAPO Price Crashes

MAPO, the native token of the Bitcoin Layer-2 and omnichain interoperability project, traded around $0.003 prior to the attack. The massive dilution triggered sharp sell-offs and liquidity evaporation.

As of this writing, MAPO traded for $0.001558, down almost 30% following the incident.

MAP Protocol (MAPO) Price Performance
MAP Protocol (MAPO) Price Performance. Source: Coingecko

Holders and liquidity providers faced immediate losses as trading pairs destabilized.

MAP Protocol positions itself as a secure infrastructure for BTC, stablecoins, and tokenized assets using light clients and MPC-based verification.

Advertisement

The bridge flaw exposed gaps in message validation despite these safeguards.

The project team has not yet issued a formal statement on mitigation steps, such as contract pauses, token blacklisting, or supply adjustments.

Investors should avoid interacting with MAPO pools or the affected bridges until official updates emerge.

This event highlights persistent risks in cross-chain infrastructure. As bridge exploits continue in 2026, users and protocols must prioritize audited verification layers and rapid response mechanisms.

Advertisement

The post 1 Quadrillion MAPO Minted: Bridge Exploit Crashes Token appeared first on BeInCrypto.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Crypto World

Super Micro Computer (SMCI) Stock Rallies 8% Following Strong Q3 Earnings Beat

Published

on

SMCI Stock Card

Key Takeaways

  • SMCI shares climbed over 8% Wednesday following a Q3 FY2026 non-GAAP EPS of $0.84, surpassing the $0.62 estimate by 35%
  • Quarterly revenue hit $10.24 billion, marking a 123% year-over-year increase, despite falling short of analyst expectations
  • Company executives elevated full-year FY2026 revenue projections to $38.9B–$40.4B
  • Super Micro disclosed concerns including significant cash outflows, increasing debt obligations, inventory accumulation, and an export compliance probe
  • Despite Wednesday’s gains, SMCI remains down 24% over the trailing twelve months, while Dell surged 112% and HPE climbed 89%

Shares of Super Micro Computer (SMCI) experienced a notable surge exceeding 8% during Wednesday’s trading session on May 20, positioning it as the top performer among AI server manufacturers that day.


SMCI Stock Card
Super Micro Computer, Inc., SMCI

The upward movement followed the company’s disclosure of Q3 FY2026 financial results that demonstrated substantial outperformance on the earnings front. The firm posted non-GAAP EPS of $0.84, handily beating analyst projections of $0.62.

Quarterly revenue totaled $10.24 billion, representing a robust 123% year-over-year expansion. The top line figure, however, failed to meet Street expectations.

Investors looked past the revenue shortfall and instead concentrated on the company’s improved outlook. Leadership increased its full-year FY2026 revenue guidance to a band of $38.9 billion through $40.4 billion.

Chief Executive Charles Liang emphasized that the organization’s “transformation into a total datacenter infrastructure provider is accelerating,” highlighting margin improvements and expansion in the DCBBS segment as indicators of underlying strength.

The organization has also broadened its manufacturing capabilities internationally, a move executives characterized as essential to meeting surging demand for AI infrastructure solutions.

Advertisement

Headwinds Persist Despite Rally

The earnings report wasn’t without blemishes. Super Micro cautioned about substantial cash outflows, mounting debt obligations, and inventory accumulation as it works to satisfy customer demand.

Company leadership also acknowledged persistent supply chain limitations. Additionally, the firm revealed it’s subject to an export-related regulatory inquiry, introducing further uncertainty for market participants tracking the equity.

These complications have contributed to SMCI’s challenging twelve-month performance. Shares remain down 24% over that timeframe, stemming from filing delays and auditor transitions that rattled shareholder confidence.

Market sentiment had been gradually improving before Wednesday’s advance. Social media sentiment data from Reddit during the May 9–10 weekend indicated bullish indicators for SMCI recovering to the 68–72 range following bearish readings earlier that month.

Advertisement

SMCI Performance Versus Dell and HPE

Wednesday’s price action gave SMCI the daily lead among its industry competitors. Dell Technologies (DELL) advanced approximately 3.9% while Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE) gained roughly 2.7%.

However, the longer-term comparison tells a different story. Across the past year, Dell has surged 112% and HPE has climbed 89%, whereas SMCI continues trading in negative territory.

Dell disclosed AI-optimized server revenue of $8.95 billion in its most recent quarter, representing a 342% year-over-year jump, with a $43 billion AI order backlog entering FY27. The company is scheduled to announce fiscal Q1 2027 results on May 28.

HPE delivered non-GAAP EPS of $0.65 last quarter, exceeding internal forecasts, with networking revenue soaring 152% year-over-year to $2.71 billion. Its upcoming earnings announcement is set for June 1.

Advertisement

Extending the timeline to five years, SMCI maintains sector leadership with a 751% advance compared to Dell’s 417% and HPE’s 134%.

Dell Technologies’ May 28 earnings report will provide the next significant benchmark for evaluating the AI server industry’s trajectory.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Crypto World

Prediction markets firms take heat in Senate Commerce hearing scrutinizing surge

Published

on

Prediction markets firms take heat in Senate Commerce hearing scrutinizing surge

Prediction markets platforms such as those run by Kalshi and Crypto.com drew two hours of critical questioning in a U.S. Senate Commerce Committee hearing, including scrutiny on the platforms’ advertising practices, regulatory disputes and the cheating they may encourage.

“We want athletes competing on merit, but the opportunity to make money can tempt gamblers — and sometimes even athletes themselves — to guarantee a sure bet,” Senator Ted Cruz, a Texas Republican who chairs the committee, said during the Wednesday hearing. He said high-profile incidents of player cheating “sow doubt in the minds of fans.”

Cruz flagged some recent cases, saying: “NBA players and coaches are accused of manipulating performance and providing insider information to win bets. Two major league baseball pitchers allegedly rigged their own pitches in exchange for money. [Major League Soccer] banned two players for intentionally getting yellow cards to win bets, and the UFC has canceled matches and terminated contracts because of suspected match fixing.”

“It is not uncommon for fans scrolling Twitter on a Sunday afternoon in the fall to see posts speculating that a controversial call by an official was related to gambling,” Cruz said.

Advertisement

Other lawmakers focused on marketing that fosters problem gambling or that has reached youths that are otherwise meant to be blocked from betting. Senator John Hickenlooper, a Colorado Democrat, accused the prediction markets businesses of unleashing the “hounds of hell” in social media and marketing to “prey on our young people.”

Patrick McHenry, who was a prominent member of the House of Representatives until his recent retirement, is now an adviser at the Coalition for Prediction Markets that represents Kalshi, Crypto.com, Robinhood, Coinbase and others. He said trades aren’t allowed for anybody under 18 and that the average age of users is 33.

Problem gamblers

Harry Levant, director of gambling policy at the Public Health Advocacy Institute, testified on Wednesday, telling the lawmakers he was a recovering gambling addict and lamenting the “avalanche of unregulated advertising” from prediction market firms.

“It’s a known addictive product, just like heroin,” he said.

Advertisement

Earlier this week, Kalshi co-founder and CEO Tarek Mansour posted on social media site X to highlight his company’s $2 million commitment with the National Council on Problem Gambling to support an initiative on “trader health and safety.””As retail participation in markets increase, we have a responsibility to balance free markets and individual responsibility with customer education and safety guardrails,” he wrote.

And still other lawmakers on Wednesday dove into the rapidly growing industry’s avoidance of state regulators and competition with regulated gaming on U.S. tribal lands, where revenue is a core support of tribal reservations’ financial health.

CFTC

Even as the senators put the event-contract space under the microscope, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission that regulates derivatives trading platforms is pursuing a lawsuit filed on Tuesday to stop a new law in Minnesota that was set to hold prediction market activity as illegal there. The regulator adds this to a growing list of lawsuits the federal agency has filed against states that have sought to limit prediction markets or declare them in violation of state gambling laws.

“This Minnesota law turns lawful operators and participants in prediction markets into felons overnight,” said CFTC Chairman Mike Selig in a statement, who added this suit alongside similar agency fights against Arizona, Connecticut, Illinois and New York.

Advertisement

Selig has led an agency legal campaign to defend his agency’s authority to supervise and regulate prediction markets, which are managed on registered platforms under CFTC rules. Meanwhile, his agency — at which he’s the sole member of what’s meant to be a five-member commission — is also pursuing a formal rule to establish tailored standards for the sector.

McHenry defended the CFTC role on Wednesday.

“The CFTC, as a cop on the beat, has the capacity to oversee this market, just as they’ve done with the broader commodities marketplace that’s been around and well versed for decades,” McHenry said.

Senator Hickenlooper responded, “You’re the first person who’s told me you think that they think the CFTC is up to the standards.”

Advertisement

One of the witnesses, Bill Miller, the president and CEO of the American Gaming Association, contended the federal regulators “are absolutely not competent to handle this, and two, they are absolutely hurting tribes and states financially.” He added that, “it was never Congress’s intent to create a federal department of gambling through the CFTC.”

McHenry argued that these event contracts are derivatives that belong to “fundamentally different business models” from bets placed with gambling businesses. He equated them to long-regulated grain futures contracts, and he added that “our member companies have enhanced surveillance greater than any casino and greater than any sportsbook in the country.”

In the end, Chairman Cruz said, “The Supreme Court may have to decide the issue.”

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Crypto World

Bitcoin Price Fails to Retake $78,000 as Markets Eye Nvidia Earnings

Published

on

Bitcoin Price Fails to Retake $78,000 as Markets Eye Nvidia Earnings

Bitcoin (BTC) halted its latest recovery at Wednesday’s Wall Street open as US traders sold off.

Key points:

  • Bitcoin nears $78,000 before the US open spoils momentum, continuing a trend from earlier in the week.
  • US stock markets await Nvidia earnings amid a tense macro atmosphere.
  • Bitcoin’s Coinbase Premium sees multi-month lows in a sign of “soft” US demand.

BTC price stops short of $78,000 ahead of Nvidia numbers

Data from TradingView showed BTC/USD reaching $77,678 on Bitstamp before the US trading session sparked fresh losses.

BTC/USD one-hour chart. Source: Cointelegraph/TradingView

Copying its moves from the week’s first two trading days, Bitcoin faced tailwinds as US market sentiment stayed bearish on the macroeconomic outlook.

The S&P 500 fell 1.3% before rebounding, with traders waiting for the week’s key potential volatility catalyst: Q1 earnings from tech company Nvidia.

Advertisement

On Monday, trading resource The Kobeissi Letter described the numbers as the “biggest earnings event of the quarter.”

Continuing, it noted the role of tech stocks in driving S&P 500 strength — even as the US-Iran war and associated inflation risk spooked other markets.

“A handful of tech stocks are driving the entire market,” it summarized in a post on X.

S&P 500 one-hour chart. Source: Cointelegraph/TradingView

Bitcoin Coinbase Premium reflects “soft” demand

In crypto circles, attention focused on the Coinbase Premium Index, which highlighted the ongoing lack of bullish sentiment during US trading sessions.

Advertisement

Related: BTC price ‘bull trap’ at $76.5K? Five things to know in Bitcoin this week

The Index, which measures the difference in price between Coinbase’s BTC/USD and Binance’s BTC/USDT pairs, fell to its lowest levels since February on the day.

Commenting in one of its QuickTake blog posts, onchain analytics platform CryptoQuant said that spot Bitcoin demand “remains soft.”

“The latest Coinbase Premium Gap reading stands near -$66.8, meaning Bitcoin is trading at a lower price on Coinbase Pro’s USD pair compared with Binance’s USDT pair. This is deeper than the late-March reading of around -$62.6, when Bitcoin was trading near $68,000,” contributor Amr Taha wrote. 

Advertisement

“The comparison is important because Bitcoin is now trading much higher, around $77,200, yet the Coinbase discount versus Binance is wider than it was when BTC was nearly $9,000 lower.”

Bitcoin Coinbase Premium gap (screenshot). Source: CryptoQuant

Others monitored familiar trend lines, including the 21-week exponential moving average (EMA).

As Cointelegraph reported, BTC/USD reclaimed that level on weekly time frames in late April, only to lose it again this week.

“Bitcoin has Weekly Closed below the 21-week EMA (green) which technically positions price to potentially turn it into new resistance on any upcoming rebound,” trader and analyst Rekt Capital told X followers on Tuesday while analyzing the weekly chart. 

“Turning the 21-week EMA into new resistance would fully confirm the breakdown from it.”

BTC/USD one-week chart. Source: Rekt Capital/X

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Crypto World

Tether Acquires SoftBank Stake in Bitcoin-Focused Treasury Company XXI

Published

on

Tether International has announced acquiring Japanese multinational investment firm SoftBank’s minority stake in the Bitcoin-focused treasury company, Twenty One Capital (XXI).

At the closing of the transaction, SoftBank’s representatives on the XXI Board of Directors stepped down in line with the shareholder agreement.

Tether Absorbs SoftBank Position

In its official blog post, Tether stated that the transaction “reflects the continued development of XXI as the company builds on its foundation and advances its long-term Bitcoin strategy.”  With the transaction finalized, SoftBank’s role in governance has now concluded.

Commenting on the latest development, Tether CEO Paolo Ardoino said,

Advertisement

“SoftBank’s involvement gave XXI the kind of institutional depth that few early-stage companies ever have. Their experience backing some of the most consequential technology companies in the world brought credibility, perspective, and discipline to XXI during a critical period of formation. They leave behind a company with a stronger foundation, a clearer mandate, and an ambitious path ahead. Tether’s conviction in XXI has only deepened, and we look forward to building on that foundation as the company enters its next chapter.”

In April 2025, Twenty One Capital was launched as a new crypto venture with Strike founder Jack Mallers named as CEO. The company was backed at launch by Tether International and Bitfinex as majority owners, alongside SoftBank Group and Cantor Fitzgerald as initial investors. It was disclosed that the company would begin with about $3.6 billion in Bitcoin held in its treasury. SoftBank was included as a minority stakeholder at formation, while Tether held controlling ownership.

Twenty One Capital went public in December of the same year through a SPAC merger in New York.

Merger Proposal

Last month, Tether put forward a multi-step plan involving Twenty One Capital, which included merging the company first with Strike. After that initial step, the plan proposes a second stage where the combined entity would then merge with the bitcoin mining company Elektron Energy.

Meanwhile, according to the latest data, Twenty One Capital is currently the second-largest public company holder of Bitcoin, with 43,514 BTC. It trails Michael Saylor-led business intelligence firm, Strategy, which holds 843,738 BTC.

Advertisement

The post Tether Acquires SoftBank Stake in Bitcoin-Focused Treasury Company XXI appeared first on CryptoPotato.

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2025