Crypto World
Bitcoin breaks Strategy’s STRC ex-dividend date slump for the first time in six months
Strategy’s (MSTR) perpetual preferred stock, STRC, is now one week past its April 15 ex-dividend date. With bitcoin now at $79,000 this marks the first time in six months that BTC has risen in the week following the payout event.
At the time of the ex-dividend date, bitcoin was around $75,000, highlighting continued strength in BTC despite the typical post dividend adjustment in STRC. STRC over the past few months has served as an aggressive funding instrument for the company’s bitcoin purchases.
Like most dividend paying securities, STRC declines on its ex-dividend date by approximately the value of the payout, since new buyers are no longer entitled to receive it.
Following that drop, the shares tend to recover gradually, often taking about two weeks to move back toward their $100 par value. STRC is currently trading at $99.47.
This recovery is important because once the stock returns to par, Strategy the largest publicly traded company holding bitcoin, can utilize its at the market (ATM) program, issuing new shares at and use the proceeds to buy additional bitcoin.
Strategy shares are more than 9% higher on Wednesday at $178 at the time of writing, with the company likely tapping its common stock ATM program to fund additional bitcoin purchases.
Strategy disclosed the third largest bitcoin purchase ever of 34,164 BTC, while the price initially stayed within its $75,000 range.
However, the bitcoin rally appears driven in part by positioning. Perpetual futures funding rates remain negative, meaning short sellers are paying long positions to hold their trades, a signal that bearish sentiment still dominates.
As prices rise in that environment, shorts are forced to close positions, creating a short squeeze that accelerates gains.
At the same time, a persistent Coinbase premium, where bitcoin trades slightly higher on the U.S. exchange than offshore platforms, points to steady spot demand.
The American Bankers Association (ABA) has asked US government agencies responsible for regulations related to a stablecoin bill for more time to comment, potentially delaying implementation by as much as two months.
In a Tuesday letter to the US Treasury Department, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC), Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) and Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control, the ABA requested the agencies extend the deadline for public comment on rules for the GENIUS Act, a stablecoin payments bill signed into law in July 2025.
The banking group asked for 60 additional days to comment on rulemaking after the issuance of a final rule by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC), saying the rules by the other agencies were “substantially dependent” on the outcome of the OCC’s.
“The FDIC has stated explicitly in its [notice] that it ‘has endeavored, in many areas, to align this proposed rule with the OCC’s proposed rule, to the extent relevant,’ and specifically invites comment ‘on the extent to which the primary Federal payment stablecoin regulators should further align in their final rules to promote consistency of regulations applicable to all PPSIs subject to the GENIUS Act,’” said the letter. “Meaningful comment on that question is impossible without knowing the final content of the OCC’s rule.”
Since being signed into law by US President Donald Trump in July, implementation of the stablecoin bill has moved to agencies like the FDIC and Treasury, which need to finalize regulations. According to the law, the legislation can be enacted 120 days after final regulations are issued or 18 months after enactment, whichever comes first.
Related: UK cracks down on illegal peer-to-peer crypto trading in nationwide raids
In addition to its request related to the GENIUS Act, the ABA is a party to policy debates concerning a crypto market structure bill, which could potentially affect the legal status of stablecoin yield. Last week, the association challenged a report from the White House that claimed banning stablecoin yields would only have a negligible impact on banks.
Stablecoin yield debate continues as Senate considers CLARITY Act
As of Wednesday, lawmakers in the US Senate had not announced a deal which could allow a separate crypto market structure bill, called the CLARITY Act when it passed the US House of Representatives in July, to move forward.
North Carolina Senator Thom Tillis reportedly said on Monday that he recommended Senate Banking Committee leader Tim Scott schedule a markup on the bill in May, potentially pushing back a vote in the full chamber.
Magazine: How to fix insider trading on platforms like Polymarket and Kalshi
Rekomendasyon: Live casino siteleri deneyimlerinize canlı ve etkileyici bir katman ekleyin. En güvenilir slot casino siteleri arasında seçebileceğiniz yeni casino siteleri ve casino bahis siteleri arasında seçim yapın.
Slot Casino Siteleri: En iyi slot siteleri, çeşitli oyunlar ve yüksek kazanç olasılıkları sunar. Güvenilir slot siteleri, güvenli ödeme sistemleri ve profesyonel müşteri hizmetleri ile öne çıkmaktadır.
Canlı Casino Siteleri: Canlı casino siteleri, canlı croupierlerle oynanabilecek reallikli oyunlar sunar. Bu siteler, kullanıcıların gerçek zamanlı bir deneyim yaşamasına olanak tanır ve profesyonel bir atmosfer sunar.
Yeni Casino Siteleri: Yeni casino siteleri, en güncel ve popüler oyunlarla kullanıcıları etkiler. Bu siteler, kullanıcı dostu arayüzler ve geniş oyun sunumları ile öne çıkmaktadır.
Casino Bahis Siteleri: Casino bahis siteleri, çeşitli bahis oyunları ve yüksek kazanç olasılıkları ile bilinen slot oyunları dışında, farklı bahis seçenekleri sunar. Güvenilir casino bahis siteleri, güvenli ve hızlı ödeme sistemleri ile öne çıkmaktadır.
Seçiminiz: En iyi slot siteleri ve canlı casino siteleri arasında seçim yaparken, güvenilirlik, güvenli ödeme sistemleri ve profesyonel müşteri hizmetleri gibi faktörleri göz önünde bulundurun. Yeni ve casino bahis siteleri de, kullanıcı dostu arayüzler ve geniş oyun sunumlarıyla ilgi çekicidir.
En İyi Slot Casino Sitelerini Keşfedin
2026 yılında güvenilir casino siteleri arasında “Yeni Casino Siteleri” adlı platforma göz atmanızı öneririm. Bu platform, slot casino siteleri ve casino bahis siteleri arasında en iyi seçenekleri sizin için sıralar. Platformda deneme bonusu veren casino siteleri de bulunuyor, bu sayede deneyimden memnuniyet duyabilirsiniz. Ayrıca, en güvenilir casino siteleri arasında yer alan sitelerin listesini bulabilirsiniz. Bu siteler, güvenilirlik ve güvenilir ödeme sistemleriyle bilinir, bu nedenle kaynaklarınızı güvenle kullanabilirsiniz.
En iyi slot siteleri arasında “Güvenilir Casino Siteleri” adlı bir platform da yer alıyor. Bu platform, slot oyunları için en iyi siteleri ve en yüksek kazançları sunuyor. Platformda bulunan siteler, kullanıcı dostu arayüzler, çeşitli oyun seçenekleri ve profesyonel müşteri hizmetleri ile öne çıkmaktadır. Ayrıca, bu sitelerde güvenilirlik ve güvenliği en üst düzeyde ön planda tutuyorlar, bu nedenle kaynaklarınızı güvenle kullanabilirsiniz. En iyi slot sitelerini keşfetmek için bu platformu kullanmanızı öneririm.
En İyi Güvenilir Kasino Sitelerinin Seçimi
En güvenilir slot casino siteleri arasında Deneme Bonusu Veren Casino Siteleri yer alıyor. Bu siteler, yeni kullanıcıların deneme oyunları ile tanışmasını sağlar, böylece riski azaltan bir deneyim sunarlar. Örneğin, Slot Casino Siteleri arasında Evraç Casino ve Fortuna Casino bu konuda öne çıkmaktadır. Bu siteler, kullanıcıların güvenli bir ortamda oynayabilecekleri çeşitli slot oyunlarını sunarlar.
Canlı Casino Siteleri de güvenilirliği açısından önemli bir rol oynar. Bu siteler, canlı cüzzamlı dealerlerle oynanabilecek oyunları sunar. Örneğin, Live Casino House ve LeoVegas Casino bu tür siteler arasında öne çıkmaktadır. Bu siteler, kullanıcıların gerçek zamanlı bir deneyim yaşayabilecekleri güvenli bir ortam sağlarlar.
Yeni Casino Siteleri de güvenilirliği açısından dikkat etmeniz gereken bir nokta. Bu siteler, güvenilirlik açısından daha yeni olup, belki de daha az bilinen markalar olabilir. Ancak, bazı siteler, güvenilirliği ve güvenliğini sağlamak için çeşitli güvenlik standartlarını takip ederler. Örneğin, Novomatic Casino ve NetEnt Casino bu tür siteler arasında güvenilirliği açısından öne çıkmaktadır.
Casino Bahis Siteleri de güvenilirliği açısından dikkat etmeniz gereken bir nokta. Bu siteler, çeşitli bahis oyunları sunarlar. Örneğin, Unibet Casino ve Bet365 Casino bu tür siteler arasında güvenilirliği açısından öne çıkmaktadır. Bu siteler, kullanıcıların güvenli bir ortamda oynayabilecekleri çeşitli bahis oyunlarını sunarlar.
Güvenilir Casino Siteleri arasında Unibet Casino ve LeoVegas Casino yer alıyor. Bu siteler, kullanıcıların güvenli bir ortamda oynayabilecekleri çeşitli slot ve bahis oyunlarını sunarlar. Ayrıca, bu siteler, kullanıcıların para yatırma ve çekme işlemlerini kolaylaştıran çeşitli ödeme yöntemlerini desteklerler.
En Güvenilir Casino Siteleri arasında Evraç Casino ve Fortuna Casino yer alıyor. Bu siteler, kullanıcıların güvenli bir ortamda oynayabilecekleri çeşitli slot oyunlarını sunarlar. Ayrıca, bu siteler, kullanıcıların güvenli bir ortamda oynayabilecekleri canlı cüzzamlı dealerlerle oynanabilecek oyunları sunarlar. Bu siteler, kullanıcıların güvenliği ve güvenilirliği açısından öne çıkmaktadır.
Stablecoin issuer argues Aave’s interest rate curve is failing to clear the $1.89B pool after four days at full utilization.
Circle has proposed an emergency overhaul of the interest rate parameters on Aave V3 Ethereum Core’s USDC pool, which has been pinned at 99.87% utilization for four days in the wake of the April 18 KelpDAO exploit.
In a governance post published Tuesday, Circle Chief Economist Gordon Liao argued Aave’s current interest rate mechanism is failing to clear the market. The pool holds $1.89 billion in supply against $1.89 billion in borrows, with less than $3 million in available liquidity. Borrow rates are flat at the post-kink ceiling of roughly 14%, and the pool has contracted about $60 million in the last 24 hours as repayments are matched dollar-for-dollar by queued withdrawals.
Liao’s proposal would raise the pool’s Slope 2 parameter for USDC deposits interest rate, from roughly 10% to 40% immediately, via a Risk Steward action. That would be followed by governance ratification of a 50% target within five to seven days.
Optimal utilization would fall from 92% to 87% on an interim basis and 85% on ratification. Under the target parameters, the maximum supply rate at 100% utilization would climb from roughly 12.6% to 48.2%.
Liao’s diagnosis is that current borrowers are using USDC borrowing as a queue-bypass mechanism to exit trapped positions and are insensitive to rates at current levels. The active lever, he argued, is supply attraction: yields in the 40–50% range should pull USDC from allocators within hours, restoring healthy utilization.
The proposal also recommends pausing Aave’s Slope 2 Risk Oracle for USDC, citing its documented underperformance during a February WETH spike and the April 6 offboarding of its maintainer, Chaos Labs.
Circle’s intervention is unusual: the stablecoin issuer is formally telling Aave that the market for its asset is broken.
Elon Musk’s Tesla’s (TSLA) bitcoin holdings were unchanged in the first quarter of 2026, with the company continuing to hold its 11,509 BTC stockpile.
The company booked an after-tax impairment loss of $173 million on its digital asset holdings, according to its first quarter earnings report.
The value of that stash declined as bitcoin fell from around $90,000 at the start of the year to roughly $68,000 by the end of March.
Tesla reported better-than-expected earnings but missed on revenue. For the first quarter, the firm reported revenue of $22.39 billion, slightly below than analyst estimates of $22.71 billion. Earnings per share came in at $0.41, higher than consensus forecast of $0.37.
TSLA stock was trading 4% higher in after-hours trading.
Tesla’s bitcoin journey
Tesla initially bought bitcoin in February 2021, acquiring 43,200 BTC for roughly $1.5 billion. About a month later, the company sold around 4,320 BTC, roughly 10% of its position, to test market liquidity.
By July 2022, amid the bear market, Tesla had cut its position to 9,720 BTC. A small increase in January 2025 brought holdings to 11,509 BTC, where they have remained since.
Oracle network Pyth Network has been selected as the resolution data source for Kalshi’s expansion into commodities markets, underscoring the growing focus on reliable pricing infrastructure in event-based trading.
Kalshi said on Wednesday that Pyth will supply real-time pricing data for its newly launched commodities hub, which debuted in April. The data will be used to determine how event contracts tied to commodity prices are settled.
The move reflects a broader push among prediction market platforms to strengthen backend infrastructure as they expand into more complex asset classes. Accurate, tamper-resistant data feeds are critical for ensuring fair and transparent contract resolution, particularly in markets tied to real-world financial benchmarks.
Kalshi’s commodities hub allows users to trade event contracts linked to physical assets, including gold, silver, oil, copper and key agricultural products. Pyth’s price feeds will serve as the source of truth for determining contract outcomes.
Pyth has also been selected by rival prediction market Polymarket to provide price feeds for equities and commodities.
Pyth Network is a decentralized oracle that delivers real-time market data to blockchain applications. As Cointelegraph recently reported, Pyth has also recently deployed infrastructure that enables institutions to publish and monetize proprietary data across multiple networks.
Related: Kalshi mulls crypto expansion with perpetual futures launch: Report
Kalshi’s federal status faces state pushback
Kalshi is rolling out these changes as it seeks to bring more structure to the fast-growing prediction market sector. The company is regulated by the US Commodity Futures Trading Commission as a designated contract market, meaning it is approved to offer trading in derivatives contracts under federal oversight, similar to a traditional exchange.
State regulators have pushed back on Kalshi and other prediction platforms, arguing that some contracts resemble unlicensed gambling or fall outside existing derivatives rules.
However, the US Department of Justice and the CFTC recently asked a federal court to block Arizona from enforcing state gambling laws against Kalshi’s contracts, signaling support for federal jurisdiction in this area.
The dispute comes as prediction market activity has grown sharply over the past two years, drawing in new entrants from both traditional finance and the crypto sector.
Related: After Kalshi appeal, prediction markets fight could head to US Supreme Court
Two CIA officers were killed in a car crash in the Mexican state of Chihuahua on April 20 while returning from a counternarcotics operation to destroy a clandestine drug lab, igniting a sovereignty dispute between Washington and Mexico City.
Summary
- Two CIA officers and two Mexican law enforcement agents died when their vehicle crashed in rugged mountain terrain in Chihuahua state.
- The crash occurred after an operation to dismantle what authorities described as one of the largest clandestine drug labs found in Mexico.
- Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum has launched an investigation into whether US agents violated Mexican law by operating without federal authorization.
Two CIA officers were killed alongside two Mexican law enforcement officials in a vehicle crash in Mexico’s Chihuahua state, following an operation targeting a large clandestine drug processing lab, multiple sources briefed on the matter confirmed to CBS News and CNN. The CIA declined to comment on the identities of the officers. Their truck crashed in rugged mountain terrain connecting Chihuahua to Sinaloa state while traveling in the middle of the night after the operation.
CIA Agents Killed in Mexico as Sovereignty Row Erupts
The crash occurred following what Chihuahua Attorney General César Jáuregui described as an operation to dismantle one of the largest clandestine chemical drug production sites ever found in the country. CBS News reported that the vehicle appears to have skidded on a mountain road and fallen into a ravine, causing it to explode. Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum confirmed on April 21 that federal prosecutors have launched an investigation to determine whether any laws were violated, specifically whether US agents participated in operations on Mexican territory without authorization from the federal government.
Mexico Questions Legality of US Presence
Sheinbaum was pointed in her public response, stating that any joint operations between local governments and the US without federal authorization would constitute a violation of Mexican law and of the constitution. CNN reported that the CIA has significantly expanded its operations inside Mexico under Director John Ratcliffe, including covertly flying MQ-9 Reaper drones over Mexican territory to monitor cartel activity, and has undertaken a review of its authorities to use lethal force against drug cartels. Sheinbaum has previously insisted that there are “no joint operations on land or in the air” in Mexico, describing US involvement as limited to information sharing within an established legal framework.
The Broader Stakes for US-Mexico Relations
The deaths come at a highly sensitive moment in US-Mexico relations. The Trump administration has designated several Mexican cartels as foreign terrorist organizations, a classification that Mexico’s government has pushed back against strongly, viewing it as a potential pretext for direct US military action on Mexican soil. The incident adds fresh pressure to a bilateral relationship already strained by tariffs, immigration enforcement, and the extent of American intelligence activity inside Mexico. How both governments respond to the investigation’s findings is likely to shape the trajectory of counternarcotics cooperation between the two countries for the near term.
The CIA has not confirmed the identities of the two officers or commented on the nature of their role in the operation that preceded the crash.
The Thai Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has opened a public consultation on proposed rule changes aimed at letting licensed digital asset businesses apply directly for derivatives licenses. The move would remove the current requirement to establish separate entities for derivatives activities and would extend the use of digital assets as eligible underlying assets for futures contracts. The proposed framework also introduces more stringent measures to manage conflicts of interest and bolster supervisory oversight. Public feedback is welcome through May 20, 2026, and will shape the final rule set.
According to the Thailand SEC, the revisions are designed to broaden access to the country’s derivatives market while safeguarding investors. By enabling existing license-holders to extend into derivatives within their current corporate structures, regulators hope to lower entry barriers for crypto firms seeking to offer hedging tools and other risk-management products. The changes also aim to elevate standards for derivatives exchanges and clearing houses in line with international practice, creating a more coherent and resilient market infrastructure.
Key takeaways
- Thailand proposes direct derivatives licensing for licensed crypto firms, eliminating the need for standalone entities.
- Digital assets would be recognized as eligible underlying assets for futures, expanding the scope of Thailand’s derivatives market.
- New rules emphasize conflict-of-interest controls and stronger regulatory oversight of exchanges and clearing houses.
- Public comment runs through May 20, 2026, with decisions likely to influence regional standards and market access.
Thailand’s plan to streamline crypto derivatives licensing
At the heart of the proposal is a practical shift in how crypto firms can participate in the derivatives segment. Instead of having to spin up a separate corporate vehicle solely to handle derivatives activities, licensed digital asset businesses could apply to offer derivatives services within their existing entities. The SEC frames this as a way to reduce bureaucratic friction while keeping activities under tighter regulatory scrutiny, rather than loosening controls.
The proposed regime would also codify the use of digital assets as underlying assets for futures contracts, a step that regulators argue will modernize the financial toolkit available to Thai investors. By broadening the instrument base, the SEC intends to improve hedging options for portfolios and provide more robust risk-management tools for both retail and institutional participants. Still, the draft rules introduce enhanced safeguards—such as stronger conflict-of-interest provisions and clearer delineation of responsibilities among exchanges, clearing houses, and market participants—to preserve market integrity as activity migrates into the derivatives space.
The Thai move aligns with a broader trend in Asia toward formalizing crypto derivatives under conventional financial-market standards. Regulators in several jurisdictions have pursued a balance between enabling sophisticated products and maintaining guardrails to mitigate systemic risk, particularly given the volatility inherent in digital assets. In Thailand’s case, the next milestone is the public consultation window, which will solicit input from market participants, lawyers, and other stakeholders before a final framework is published.
Global derivatives expansion: what the US could unlock
The Thai proposal arrives as the global derivatives landscape around crypto continues to evolve. In a parallel development, perpetual futures—positions that can be held around the clock—are gaining traction across major platforms as firms prepare for potential regulatory approvals in the United States. Blockchain.com, for example, recently launched perpetual futures trading within its self-custody wallet, enabling users to open leveraged BTC-denominated positions without transferring funds to an exchange. The feature, built on Hyperliquid’s execution layer, provides access to more than 190 markets with up to 40x leverage.
Other major exchanges have pursued similar offerings for non-US clients, expanding 24/7, multi-asset trading access. Kraken and Coinbase each introduced perpetual futures tied to equities for non-US users in earlier waves of product development. While these products remain largely inaccessible to U.S. residents for now, the regulatory outlook in Washington could shift the landscape. In March, comments from CFTC Chair Rostin Behn suggested the agency is actively considering crypto perpetual futures, indicating a potential move to enable such products within the coming months. If realized, the change could unlock a new cadre of venues and liquidity for U.S. traders seeking non-traditional hedges and speculative tools beyond spot markets.
The market has already seen strategic moves that hint at anticipated regulatory alignment. Payward, the parent company of Kraken, agreed to acquire Bitnomial, a U.S.-regulated derivatives venue, a deal framed as expanding access to regulated crypto derivatives for U.S. clients. The consolidation signals a broader industry push to anchor crypto derivatives in compliant, well-governed venues, which could appeal to institutional participants wary of regulatory risk and counterparty risk in less-regulated trading environments.
Taken together, the Thai consultation and the broader push in the United States underscore a shared objective: to mature crypto derivatives into reliable, capital-efficient tools for hedging, risk management, and yield generation. Regulators appear to be calibrating the balance between broad market access and robust oversight, with a clearer emphasis on standardized governance for exchanges and clearing environments worldwide.
Industry implications and what to watch next
For investors and builders, Thailand’s proposed changes could reduce the friction for legitimate crypto firms to offer derivative products within a familiar corporate structure, potentially accelerating the regional adoption of hedging strategies and complex financial products tied to digital assets. If implemented with rigorous oversight, the framework could also reassure institutional players seeking compliant venues and clear risk frameworks, contributing to a more resilient regional market.
From a global angle, the emergence of perpetual futures and regulatory-adjacent activity in major markets raises questions about the pace of U.S. approvals and the boundaries of permissible products. Regulators are balancing the desire to protect investors with the benefits of more transparent, regulated marketplaces that can deliver access to mainstream participants. As the U.S. debate advances, exchanges and liquidity providers will likely continue expanding offerings for non-U.S. customers while preparing for potential U.S. entry points.
Market participants will be keenly watching several milestones: the final shape of Thailand’s derivatives licensing rules after the May 20 consultation; any formal guidance on the treatment of digital assets as underlying assets in Thai futures markets; and the timing and scope of any U.S. regulatory green lights for crypto perpetual futures. Together, these developments could influence where liquidity flows, how risk is managed, and which platforms gain prominence as the global crypto derivatives ecosystem evolves.
For readers tracking regulatory trajectories and product innovation, the Thai process offers a concrete example of how a jurisdiction can ease access to advanced financial instruments while preserving rigorous governance standards. The convergence of regional reform and global product experimentation suggests a maturation phase for the crypto derivatives arena, one that could redefine hedging options and capital efficiency for years to come.
The public consultation in Thailand runs through May 20, 2026. As industry participants prepare feedback, observers should monitor how the final framework handles cross-border activity, conflicts of interest, licensing eligibility, and the interplay with existing securities and futures regimes. The outcome could both unlock new pathways for Thai crypto firms and accelerate the global shift toward regulated, investor-protective derivatives infrastructure.
Traders on Kalshi, a regulated US prediction market, now assign a 66.6% probability that President Donald Trump will be impeached before January 2028. The contract has attracted more than $2.76 million in trading volume.
The odds have more than doubled since November 2025, when the market opened near 30%. The contract peaked above 70% in March before pulling back slightly to its current level.
Midterm Risk Fuels the Bet
Kalshi’s impeachment contract resolves “Yes” if the US House of Representatives passes articles of impeachment, verified through congress.gov. It does not require Senate conviction or removal from office.
“The shift suggests growing expectations of political trouble ahead, though outcomes remain uncertain,” stated Walter Bloomberg, a popular account on X.
The steady climb reflects trader expectations around the 2026 midterms. Separate prediction markets give Democrats roughly a 71% chance of retaking the House.
A Democratic majority would likely pursue impeachment proceedings, mirroring the two House votes during Trump’s first term.
Geopolitical tensions have also contributed to the rise. Trump’s rhetoric on Iran and the Strait of Hormuz prompted renewed calls from Democratic lawmakers for impeachment or invoking the 25th Amendment.
However, a separate Kalshi market on full removal, which requires a two-thirds Senate vote or the 25th Amendment, trades far lower at roughly 27%.
Prediction markets can also misfire, as traders learned during the 2016 presidential election.
No formal impeachment proceedings are underway as of April 22, 2026.
Whether the odds continue rising will depend largely on November’s midterm results and how Congress responds to the administration’s foreign policy decisions.
The post Markets Anticipate Political Trouble for Trump As Impeachment Odds Rise to 70% appeared first on BeInCrypto.
Coinbase listed Tokenised GBP (tGBP) on April 22, making it the exchange’s first British pound-backed stablecoin available to users globally.
The tGBP stablecoin is issued by FCA-registered BCP Technologies and fully backed 1:1 by cash and short-term UK government bonds.
Why the tGBP Stablecoin Matters for the UK
The listing gives UK users a way to hold and transfer value in their local currency on the Coinbase exchange without converting to dollar-pegged stablecoins.
That removes foreign exchange friction for British traders and businesses.
Keith Grose, Coinbase’s UK lead, wrote that locally denominated stablecoins are essential for the country’s role in the on-chain economy.
Users can now buy, sell, convert, send, and receive tGBP through the Coinbase app and Coinbase Exchange.
The broader stablecoin market has grown past $320 billion in total capitalization.
In 2025 alone, stablecoins settled over $30 trillion in transactions, with usage largely uncorrelated to crypto price swings.
Industry Leaders Back the Move
Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong endorsed the listing, calling stablecoins “the best form of money.”
Polygon Foundation CEO Sandeep Nailwal offered a broader warning about adoption timelines.
“Countries slow to adopt stablecoins will face the same problem as late internet adopters,” he wrote.
Nailwal noted that cross-border payments still cost 6% and take days, while stablecoins settle in seconds for fractions of a cent.
The UK’s regulatory framework for stablecoins remains in development, with full implementation expected by late 2026.
Whether tGBP gains meaningful traction may depend on how quickly the FCA finalizes those rules.
The post Coinbase Lists First GBP Stablecoin as UK Push Accelerates appeared first on BeInCrypto.
Crypto World
The $292 million Kelp DAO exploit shows why crypto bridges are still one of the industry’s weakest links
The $292 million exploit tied to KelpDAO is the latest in a long line of crypto bridge hacks, underscoring how the systems designed to connect blockchains have become some of the easiest ways to break them.
The incident involved KelpDAO’s use of LayerZero’s cross-chain messaging system, a type of infrastructure widely used to move data and assets between blockchains.
Bridges are meant to let users move assets from one blockchain to another, like from Ethereum to a different network. But instead of acting as seamless connectors, they have repeatedly turned into weak points, draining billions of dollars over the past few years.
So why does this keep happening?
Crypto ecosystem leaders say the answer is not just bad code or careless mistakes. The problem is more fundamental; it is in how bridges are built in the first place.
The core problem: trusting the middleman
To understand the issue, it helps to look at what a bridge actually does.
If you move tokens from one blockchain to another, the second chain needs proof that your tokens existed and were locked on the first one. In an ideal world, it would verify that itself. In reality, that is too expensive and complex.
“Most bridges don’t fully verify what happened on another chain,” said Ben Fisch, CEO of Espresso Systems. “Instead, they rely on a smaller system to report it. That [second] system becomes the thing you trust.”
So instead of independently checking the truth, bridges outsource it, often to small validator groups or external networks like LayerZero or Axelar. That shortcut creates risk. In the Kelp DAO-related exploit, attackers targeted the data feeding into the bridge.
“Attackers compromised nodes and fed the system a false version of reality,” Fisch said. “The bridge worked as designed. It just believed the wrong information.”
Bridge hacks often look different on the surface. Some involve stolen keys, others faulty smart contracts. But experts say those are symptoms of a deeper issue. The real problem lies in how the systems are designed.
“Anything that can go wrong will go wrong, and bridge hacks are a perfect example,” said Sergej Kunz, co-founder of 1inch. “You see code vulnerabilities, centralization issues, social engineering, even economic attacks. Usually it’s a mix.”
How bridges work
For users, bridges look simple. You click a button and move assets from one blockchain to another. Behind the scenes, the process is more complicated.
First, your tokens are locked on the original blockchain. Then a separate system confirms that the tokens are locked. This system usually consists of a small group of operators or validators. Those operators then send a message to the second blockchain saying the tokens were locked so new ones can be issued. If that message is accepted, the second chain creates a new version of your tokens. These are wrapped tokens, like rsETH or WBTC.
The problem is that this process depends on trusting whoever sends that message. If attackers compromise that system, they can send a false message and create tokens that were never backed on the original chain.
“The worst case is when the system isn’t really checking anything,” Fisch said. “It’s just trusting someone else’s version of events.”
When one failure spreads
Given how often bridges fail, why has the industry not fixed them?
Part of the answer comes down to incentives. “Security is often not the top priority,” Kunz said. “Teams focus on launching quickly, growing users and increasing total value locked.”
Building secure systems takes time and money. Many DeFi projects operate with limited resources, making it difficult to invest heavily in audits, monitoring and infrastructure.
At the same time, projects are racing to support more blockchains. Each new integration adds complexity. “Every new connection adds more assumptions,” Fisch said.
Bridge hacks rarely stay contained. Bridged assets are used across lending protocols, liquidity pools and yield strategies. If those assets are compromised, the damage spreads.
“Other platforms may treat a hacked asset as legitimate,” Kunz said. “That’s how contagion happens.” Users are rarely told how a bridge actually works or what could go wrong.
There are ways to make bridges safer. Fisch says one key step is removing single points of failure by relying on independent data sources rather than shared infrastructure.
In practice, these “data sources” are computers that watch blockchains and report what happened. They might be run by the bridge itself, by outside networks like LayerZero, or by infrastructure providers. But many rely on the same underlying services, meaning a single compromised source can feed bad data across multiple systems.
“If everyone is relying on the same source, you haven’t reduced risk,” he said. “You’ve just copied it.”
Other approaches include hardware protections and better monitoring to catch misconfigurations early. Some developers are also working on designs that verify data directly using cryptography instead of intermediaries.
Kunz believes a more fundamental shift is needed. “As long as we rely on validator-based bridges, these problems will continue,” he said.
Read more: North Korea’s crypto heist playbook is expanding and DeFi keeps getting hit
Banking Group Asks for More Time to Comment on US Stablecoin Bill
Labour set for huge defeat in Lambeth as Greens and Indies rise
Easily control your distance from the bunker with this tip
Manchester United reach agreement with Casemiro over contract clause amid transfer speculation
Steven Gerrard disagrees with Gary Neville over ‘shock’ Chelsea and Arsenal claim | Football
US brings back mandatory military draft registration
-
Fashion5 days agoWeekend Open Thread: Theodora Dress
-
Sports5 days agoNWFL Suspends Two Players Over Post-Match Clash in Ado-Ekiti
-
Politics5 days agoPalestine barred from entering Canada for FIFA Congress
-
Entertainment3 days ago
NBA Analyst Charles Barkley Chimes in on Ice Spice McDonald’s Fiasco
-
Business3 days agoPowerball Result April 18, 2026: No Jackpot Winner in Powerball Draw: $75 Million Rolls Over
-
Tech4 days agoAuto Enthusiast Scores Running Tesla Model 3 for Two Grand and Turns It Into Bare-Bones Go-Kart
-
Politics3 days agoZack Polanski demands ‘council homes not luxury flats for foreign investors’
-
Crypto World5 days agoRussia Pushes Bill to Criminalize Unregistered Crypto Services
-
Politics2 days agoGary Stevenson delivers timely reminder to register to vote as deadline TODAY
-
Tech7 days ago‘Avatar: Aang, The Last Airbender’ Leaked Online. Some Fans Say Paramount Deserves the Fallout
-
Business6 days agoCreo Medical agree sale of its manufacturing operation
-
Business11 hours agoRolls-Royce Voted UK’s Most Iconic Trade Mark as IPO Register Hits 150
-
Crypto World5 days agoRussia Introduces Bill To Criminalize Unregistered Crypto Services
-
Politics3 hours agoStarmer handler McSweeney to be dragged from shadows by Foreign Affairs Committee
-
Politics3 hours agoZack Polanski responds to home secretary’s taser threat
-
Politics4 hours ago
Wings Over Scotland | How To Get Away With Crimes
-
Crypto World4 days agoKelp DAO rsETH Bridge Hack Drains $292M as DeFi Losses Top $600M in Two Weeks
-
Tech7 days agoFord EV and tech chief leaving automaker
-
Sports7 days agoBritish climbers complete new route in Swiss Alps
-
Sports7 days ago“Felt Much Better Today”: Josh Hazlewood Opens Up On His Recovery Win Over LSG
You must be logged in to post a comment Login