Connect with us
DAPA Banner
DAPA Coin
DAPA
COIN PAYMENT ASSET
PRIVACY · BLOCKDAG · HOMOMORPHIC ENCRYPTION · RUST
ElGamal Encrypted MINE DAPA
🚫 GENESIS SOLD OUT
DAPAPAY COMING

Crypto World

CFTC Backs Kalshi in Ohio Appeals Court Case on Event Contracts

Published

on

Crypto Breaking News

The U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission has urged the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals to affirm federal reach over prediction markets in a dispute centered on Kalshi and the state of Ohio. In an amicus brief filed on behalf of the agency, the CFTC argues that Ohio’s attempt to curb Kalshi’s sports-event contracts represents a jurisdictional overreach that threatens the CFTC’s longstanding oversight of event-based markets traded on designated contract markets (DCMs).

The dispute began when Ohio authorities told Kalshi last year to halt its sports-event contracts in the state, labeling them unlicensed sports gambling. Kalshi subsequently sued the Ohio Casino Control Commission and the state attorney general in an effort to obtain a federal court order blocking state action. A federal district court in Ohio denied Kalshi’s request in March, prompting an appeal to the Sixth Circuit.

“The federal district court in Ohio took an improperly narrow view of the Commission’s jurisdiction, and we are asking the Court of Appeals to correct that error,” CFTC Chairman Mike Selig stated. “As I’ve said repeatedly, the CFTC will not allow overzealous state governments to undermine the agency’s longstanding authority over these markets.”

The amicus filing signals the CFTC’s willingness to mobilize federal authority to shield prediction markets from potential state encroachments. The agency contends that Ohio’s actions would disrupt the regulatory framework surrounding event contracts, which the CFTC views as swaps or binary options traded on DCMs under federal supervision. The brief argues that the Ohio jurisdictional overreach could imperil the CFTC’s authority over similar contracts beyond sports-related events.

The Kalshi-Ohio case is part of a broader legal riddle about how far states may go in regulating federally overseen prediction markets. The decision has practical consequences for major platforms in the space, including Kalshi and Polymarket, as well as other CFTC-regulated venues such as Crypto.com, Robinhood, and Coinbase. The outcome could influence how state regulators interact with federally designated markets and may shape future licensing and enforcement strategies for market operators.

Advertisement

The CFTC’s latest amicus brief is the agency’s second supporting a prediction-market contender. In February, the CFTC filed a brief in the Ninth Circuit in a separate matter supporting Crypto.com in a Nevada regulatory dispute. The agency’s posture suggests a broader pattern of federal protection for prediction markets against state attempts to apply divergent regulatory theories to activity that falls under federal market regulation.

Key takeaways

  • The Sixth Circuit is asked to endorse the CFTC’s view that federal jurisdiction over event contracts cannot be overridden by state actions, preserving the CFTC’s authority over prediction markets traded on DCMs.
  • The legal clash centers on Kalshi’s ability to offer sports-event contracts within Ohio and whether state regulators can bar federally regulated markets within their borders.
  • The CFTC’s amicus brief marks the agency’s second public backing of a prediction-market platform, following a prior filing in the Ninth Circuit on Crypto.com’s Nevada-related regulatory matter.
  • The dispute sits within a wider pattern of states challenging federal regulation of prediction markets, including recent suits and cease-and-desist actions involving Wisconsin, New York, Arizona, Connecticut, and Illinois.
  • Analysts and compliance teams should monitor how the appellate court interprets federal over state power in the prediction-market space, given potential licensing, cross-border operations, and regulatory alignment considerations for platform operators.

Context and legal significance

The core question in Kalshi’s Ohio case is whether state authorities may regulate or restrict “event contracts” that the CFTC treats as part of its federal mandate to oversee swaps and binary options trading on designated contract markets. The CFTC contends that allowing state intervention would “imperil” the agency’s exclusive jurisdiction over these contracts and thereby threaten the integrity of a nationwide regulatory regime designed to oversee formalized risk-transfer markets. The agency’s posture underscores the Biden-era enforcement emphasis on preserving federal preemption in financial-market regulation, particularly as prediction markets gain more institutional traction and visitor interest from mainstream platforms.

Ohio’s stance—describing Kalshi’s offerings as unlicensed sports gambling—reflects a broader tension between state gambling laws and federal market oversight. Critics of aggressive state enforcement argue that a patchwork of state interpretations could complicate compliance for national platforms, forcing operators to navigate divergent rules that may conflict with federal standards. Proponents of state action, however, contend that consumer protection and revenue considerations justify local oversight. The Sixth Circuit’s eventual ruling could clarify how courts balance these competing interests, with implications for both licensing regimes and enforcement authorities across the United States.

Regulatory landscape and cross-cutting implications

The Ohio episode is one thread in a miscellany of legal actions that collectively test the boundaries of federal market regulation. The CFTC’s suits against Wisconsin, New York, Arizona, Connecticut, and Illinois—where regulators targeted various prediction-market ventures or the operators themselves—illustrate a sustained effort to guard the federal framework from state-by-state constriction. In the Ohio matter, the question is not merely whether Kalshi violated state rules, but whether the state could assert jurisdiction over activity that the CFTC administers on a nationwide basis.

From a policy perspective, the dispute has significance for platforms that operate or plan to operate prediction markets in multiple jurisdictions. Kalshi, Polymarket, and Crypto.com are among the players tied to the CFTC-regulated DCM framework, and the outcome could affect licensing pathways, registration requirements, and the scope of permissible event-contract offerings. For institutions, these developments intersect with AML/KYC considerations, risk controls, and ongoing compliance with a federal standard that preempts inconsistent state actions.

Advertisement

Beyond the U.S. federal-state dynamic, observers note potential cross-border ramifications. European markets sit under a different regulatory architecture, with MiCA (Markets in Crypto-Assets) shaping licensing and supervision for crypto-asset-related activities. While MiCA operates in a separate jurisdiction, the Kalshi-Ohio dispute highlights the ongoing friction between provincial or national regulatory prerogatives and centralized, federally coordinated market oversight—a theme that may inform cross-border platform strategies and regulatory dialogue in the years ahead.

Institutional impact and compliance considerations

For exchanges and platform operators, the case underscores the importance of robust licensing strategies and clear delineation of the jurisdictional boundaries governing event-based contracts. Compliance teams should monitor evolving appellate rulings, as decisions at the Sixth Circuit level could recalibrate expectations for state interactions with federally regulated markets. Risk and legal teams may need to review internal controls around product offerings to ensure alignment with the prevailing interpretation of what constitutes a DCM-traded event contract and how those contracts are classified for regulatory purposes.

From a governance perspective, the CFTC’s involvement in amicus filings indicates a willingness to engage in strategic litigation that defines the perimeter of federal authority over prediction markets. Institutions should prepare for continued regulatory contestation across districts and circuits, with potential implications for licensing, enforcement risk, and the scalability of platform operations in the United States.

For market participants, the ongoing discourse reinforces the importance of transparent compliance programs, clear product disclosures, and consistent enforcement narratives. In parallel, the case may influence how state regulators assess related gaming and gambling statutes in relation to federally regulated financial-market activities, potentially prompting harmonization efforts or renewed legislative dialogue at both state and federal levels.

Advertisement

Closing perspective

The Kalshi-Ohio matter remains a focal point in the evolving interface between state regulatory prerogatives and federal market oversight. While the Sixth Circuit weighs the CFTC’s jurisdictional claim, observers should watch for how the appellate court interprets the balance of powers and what that portends for the broader ecosystem of prediction-market platforms. The outcome will not only shape licensing and enforcement norms but could also influence cross-border regulatory alignment and the strategic posture of institutional market participants in this rapidly developing sector.

Risk & affiliate notice: Crypto assets are volatile and capital is at risk. This article may contain affiliate links. Read full disclosure

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Crypto World

Prediction Market Need Measured Approach to Insider Trading

Published

on

Prediction Market Need Measured Approach to Insider Trading

Prediction market regulators should consider a measured approach to insider trading enforcement as opposed to an outright ban, according to research from an academic at the Stevens Institute of Technology.

In a paper released on June 2, assistant professor of finance Balbinder Singh Gill developed a formal economic model to answer the question of how strictly insider trading in prediction markets should be policed.

A paradox exists in that “the same insider trade that improves the accuracy of the price today can reduce the participation that makes the price informative tomorrow,” he said. 

The model showed that prediction market price accuracy is “hump-shaped” in enforcement intensity, with too little enforcement letting insiders crowd out participants, while too much enforcement removes the insider’s genuine informational contribution.

Advertisement

“Tougher enforcement curbs the insider, raising participation, so accuracy is hump-shaped and optimal enforcement is interior, neither laissez-faire nor a ban,” he said.

Insider trading has been a persistent problem for prediction markets, with regulators pushing for crackdowns or banning platforms outright.

The CFTC’s chief enforcement director warned prediction market insider traders in April that violators would face enforcement action. In May, US House lawmakers launched a probe into Kalshi and Polymarket over insider trading. 

Different levels of enforcement needed

Singh Gill argued that the level of enforcement should be determined by where the insider information comes from.

Advertisement

Researched information where a trader has worked hard to learn something should have the least, or no enforcement, adding that any crackdown on this level discourages valuable information production.

Related: US House lawmakers launch probe into Kalshi, Polymarket insider trading

Misappropriated information, such as leaked data or classified information, which would be considered insider information, should have a higher level of enforcement.

Meanwhile, cases where the insider can influence the outcome, such as a political candidate betting on their own campaign, should have the most enforcement.

Advertisement

“Trading on a genuine, independently researched edge is the activity society should be most reluctant to punish […] And trading by those who can move the outcome warrants the stiffest enforcement, because their positions invite manipulation.” 

Enforcement in a prediction market should be “calibrated rather than maximal,” he concluded. 

Balanced enforcement provides optimal welfare. Source: Balbinder Singh Gill

Kalshi to check user employment details 

The paper came as Kalshi is introducing new measures to combat insider trading by requiring users in some sensitive markets to disclose employment information. 

Users betting in sensitive markets, such as company performance or national security, will need to disclose their employer via an online form. It has also developed a “specific risk score” assigned to markets with heightened insider trading or manipulation risk.

The changes follow an audit committee report recommending better data collection and pressure from lawmakers and regulators.

Advertisement

Two recent high-profile insider trading cases involving competitor Polymarket were flagged and also referenced in Singh Gill’s paper. 

A Google employee was charged in May with using insider information about the company’s search trends to make $1.2 million on Polymarket, and a US soldier was charged in April with trading on classified knowledge of a military operation.

Magazine: Vietnam preps crypto pilot, HK pushes tokenization: Asia Express

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Crypto World

Ripple-linked token drops 4.5% to break another support level

Published

on

Ripple-linked token drops 4.5% to break another support level

XRP keeps finding buyers near major support, but it keeps losing support anyway. The latest drop pushed the token back toward the same $1.10 area that several analysts had flagged as a key line in the sand, with selling pressure accelerating once $1.13 gave way.

News Background

• Several analysts pointed to the $1.09 area as a major Fibonacci support level that XRP had been approaching for months.

• XRP remains trapped below its 100-day and 200-day moving averages, underscoring the broader bearish trend despite periodic relief rallies.

• Trading activity surged during the selloff before quickly normalizing, suggesting a large repositioning event rather than a steady increase in bearish conviction.

Advertisement

Price Action Summary

• XRP fell from $1.1505 to $1.1248 during the 24-hour session, losing more than 4%.

• The breakdown accelerated after price lost support near $1.13, with volume surging to 109.9 million XRP, more than double the daily average.

• XRP later tested support near $1.1240 before stabilizing into the close as selling momentum began to fade.

Technical Analysis

• The most important development was the loss of $1.13 support, which now becomes the first resistance level on any recovery attempt.

Advertisement

• Volume confirmed the move. The selloff occurred on some of the strongest activity seen in months, suggesting active liquidation and repositioning rather than passive weakness.

• At the same time, momentum indicators are nearing oversold territory. Daily RSI readings have fallen close to levels that historically preceded at least short-term relief rallies.

• The broader structure remains bearish. XRP continues trading inside a descending channel and below every major trend indicator that longer-term traders monitor.

What traders should watch

• $1.10-$1.12 is now the key support zone. A decisive break lower would increase the risk of a move toward $1.00 and potentially the $0.80-$0.90 region.

Advertisement

• $1.13 is the first level bulls need to reclaim to ease immediate downside pressure.

• Beyond that, attention shifts to $1.20 and then the larger $1.35-$1.40 resistance zone where previous recovery attempts failed.

• The setup is becoming increasingly compressed. Either buyers finally defend the current support area with conviction, or XRP risks turning a difficult correction into a much larger breakdown.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Crypto World

XRP Whale Inflows to Binance Decline as Selling Pressure Shows Signs of Easing

Published

on

Brian Armstrong's Bold Prediction: AI Agents Will Soon Dominate Global Financial

TLDR:

  • XRP inflows to Binance from wallets holding over 1M tokens have declined sharply since the 2025 peak.
  • On-chain data shows no extraordinary inflow spike, ruling out aggressive whale selling or profit-taking now.
  • The current XRP price drop is tied to leverage liquidations and broad market weakness, not whale distribution.
  • If Binance inflows stay low and demand holds, XRP could realistically revisit the $1.8 to $2.0 price range.

XRP exchange inflows to Binance have declined notably following the 2025 market peak, and on-chain data now points to reduced selling activity among large holders.

Transfers exceeding one million XRP dominated exchange inflow charts between 2021 and 2025, reflecting consistent participation from whale and institutional-scale addresses.

The recent pullback in these flows, despite a price retreat from the $3 region, suggests that major market participants are becoming less inclined to sell.

Whale Activity Shifts as Large-Scale XRP Transfers to Binance Drop

Historically, sharp spikes in the 100K–1M XRP and 1M+ XRP inflow categories have preceded major market downturns.

These surges typically signal that large holders are moving assets to exchanges ahead of selling. However, no such extraordinary spike currently appears at the far right of the inflow chart. This absence is a meaningful contrast to prior bear market conditions.

Advertisement

CryptoQuant analyst PelinayPA noted that the post-ETF approval period coincides with this drop in whale inflows. The reduced exchange activity suggests whales may be holding positions rather than distributing.

That behavioral shift stands out, especially given XRP’s recent price correction. It points to a market structure that differs from previous cycles.

Advertisement

The current price decline appears linked more to leverage liquidations and broader market weakness than to deliberate whale selling. In past severe downturns, exchange inflows rose aggressively as investors rushed to exit positions.

That pattern is not repeating now. The on-chain picture, therefore, does not support the narrative of widespread profit-taking at this stage.

Between 2021 and 2025, large-scale inflows remained consistently elevated, showing that whales actively used Binance as a distribution venue. The recent reversal of that trend is therefore notable.

It reflects a measurable change in behavior among the market’s largest participants. Whether this shift sustains depends on whether inflows stay suppressed in the weeks ahead.

Advertisement

Subdued Binance Inflows Could Reduce Selling Supply and Support XRP Price

PelinayPA stated in the analysis: “If Binance inflows remain subdued, the available selling supply could continue to decrease. Combined with stronger demand, this would make it easier for XRP to revisit the $1.8–$2.0 range.”

That projection rests on the assumption that the current low-inflow environment holds. Any renewed surge in the 1M+ XRP category would challenge that outlook.

XRP’s price stood at $1.11 at the time of writing, with a 24-hour trading volume of $1,754,706,743. The asset recorded a 5.12% decline over the past 24 hours and an 8.28% drop over the prior seven days. Despite these figures, the on-chain data does not yet reflect panic-driven selling from major holders.

Reduced exchange supply, when paired with sustained or growing demand, typically creates favorable conditions for price recovery.

Advertisement

The $1.8–$2.0 range cited in the analysis represents a plausible near-term target if inflows remain low. However, this structure remains sensitive to any sharp reversal in whale behavior. Traders and analysts will likely continue monitoring inflow trends closely.

As long as no renewed surge emerges in the 1M+ XRP inflow category, the current market structure may remain constructive. The broader market environment will also play a role in whether that structure holds.

For now, the declining inflow trend offers a data-backed case for cautious optimism. The next few weeks will clarify whether whales maintain their current stance.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Crypto World

Humanity founder reveals employee laptop breach behind $36M exploit

Published

on

Humanity founder reveals employee laptop breach behind $36M exploit

Humanity Protocol has revealed that a compromised employee laptop enabled attackers to obtain control of bridge administration systems across Ethereum and BNB Smart Chain, resulting in the theft and minting of more than $36 million worth of H tokens.

Summary

  • Humanity Protocol says a compromised employee laptop enabled attackers to seize bridge controls and steal more than $36 million in H tokens.
  • Attackers allegedly compromised multisig keys on Ethereum and BNB Smart Chain, draining 141.2 million H and minting 200 million additional tokens.
  • The project has halted bridge activity, is working with exchanges and police, and plans to release a full post-mortem report.

According to a statement shared with crypto.news by Humanity founder and CEO Terence Kwok, the June 8 incident was a coordinated attack that targeted the project’s bridge infrastructure on multiple networks.

“Last night, June 8, 2026, the Humanity was hit by a coordinated attack across Ethereum and BSC,” Kwok said.

Advertisement

Providing the first detailed explanation of how the breach occurred, Kwok said the attacker gained access after compromising an employee device.

“This was a result of a breach that happened after an employee’s laptop was compromised.”

The founder said three of the six Gnosis Safe owner keys controlling the Hyperlane bridge ProxyAdmin on Ethereum were compromised. Humanity Protocol said the attacker transferred ownership of the ProxyAdmin contract to a wallet under their control, upgraded the bridge contract to a malicious implementation, and moved approximately 141.2 million H tokens in a single transaction.

A similar compromise took place on BNB Smart Chain. According to Humanity Protocol, three of five Safe owner keys were compromised, allowing the attacker to seize control of the bridge’s ProxyAdmin contract, deploy a malicious implementation with an unlimited mint function, and mint 200,000,005 H tokens in two separate transactions.

The project currently estimates that more than $36 million has been stolen and sold across both chains.

Advertisement

Compromised multisig keys enabled bridge takeover

Fresh details from Humanity Protocol expand on earlier disclosures from the team, which had initially confirmed only that private keys linked to a Humanity Foundation member were compromised.

Earlier on June 9, on-chain analyst Specter reported that more than 17 wallets associated with Humanity Protocol had been drained. Initial estimates placed losses near $19 million before later blockchain analysis increased the figure to more than $30 million.

Blockchain data cited by Specter indicated that the attacker sold part of the stolen H tokens and converted a substantial portion of the proceeds into Ethereum. According to the analyst’s Telegram update, roughly $23.7 million had been swapped into ETH, while approximately $7.9 million remained in H tokens.

Advertisement

Separate monitoring from blockchain security firm Blockaid had previously suggested that an attacker obtained proxy administrator rights on BNB Smart Chain and minted additional H tokens.

Humanity Protocol’s latest incident report confirms that administrative control of the bridge infrastructure was seized and used to create new tokens on the network.

Questions about the exploit emerged as H experienced unusual trading activity ahead of a scheduled token unlock later this month.

As reported by crypto.news earlier, blockchain investigator ZachXBT had initially considered whether the reported key compromise could have been used to conceal insider selling. However, after reviewing the movement and laundering of stolen funds, he concluded that the available evidence supported Humanity Protocol’s explanation that the exploit stemmed from a genuine private key compromise rather than an insider theft scheme.

Advertisement

Humanity Protocol is scheduled to unlock additional tokens on June 25 under a revised investor vesting plan. Previous reporting by crypto.news showed that some early investors opted for a discounted immediate unlock instead of a longer vesting schedule.

Exchanges and police are assisting recovery efforts

Response efforts remain ongoing as Humanity Protocol works to contain the fallout from the attack and investigate the breach.

“We’ve now halted all deposits and withdrawals to the affected bridges and are working with all related parties, including exchanges, to minimize the impact,” Kwok said.

The project said it is coordinating with exchanges and security partners while conducting an internal investigation into the incident.

Advertisement

“We’re also working closely with the police to investigate this incident and recover some of the stolen funds,” Kwok added.

Market reaction to the exploit was severe. Trading data cited in previous reports showed H falling from its June 2 all-time high near $0.844 to around $0.123 after the attack, erasing most of the token’s earlier rally as trading volume surged above $605 million.

Despite the losses, Kwok said the team remains focused on recovering assets, identifying those responsible, and strengthening the project’s defenses.

“We’re committed to seeing this through by recovering what we can, holding those responsible accountable, and rebuilding our security from the ground up.”

Humanity Protocol said it plans to release a full post-mortem report once its investigation progresses further.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Crypto World

Japan’s three megabanks target joint yen stablecoin by March 2027

Published

on

Source: Nikkei/X

MUFG Bank, Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corporation and Mizuho Bank plan to start live transactions with a jointly issued stablecoin during fiscal year 2026. Japan’s fiscal year ends in March 2027.

Summary

  • Japan’s three megabanks target live stablecoin transactions within fiscal 2026 under a shared banking framework.
  • A new council will examine issuance infrastructure, governance, operating rules, systems and future bank participation.
  • The FSA-backed pilot tested corporate cross-border payments through a trust structure using Progmat’s blockchain infrastructure.

The banks signed a memorandum to create a voluntary council that will prepare the operating and governance framework. The project follows a regulatory pilot supported by Japan’s Financial Services Agency.

Source: Nikkei/X
Source: Nikkei/X

Three banks prepare joint stablecoin transactions

The banks will issue the stablecoin through a trust agreement. They will act as joint settlors, while a trust bank or a similar institution will serve as trustee.

The structure aims to let the banks share one issuance framework instead of developing separate tokens. The official statement did not provide the token’s issue size, blockchain network, retail access terms or precise rollout date.

Advertisement

“The three banks will accelerate their initiatives,” the joint statement said.

In addition, the council will examine issuance infrastructure, system design, governance and operating processes. It will also review Japanese laws and market conditions before live transactions begin.

MUFG, SMBC and Mizuho will establish the council first. The group may later work with other financial institutions and related companies that want to join the stablecoin framework.

The banks aim to support several payment uses rather than one limited test. However, they have not named the first commercial users or confirmed whether initial transactions will focus only on corporate payments.

FSA-backed pilot tested cross-border payments

The FSA supported the proof-of-concept in November 2025. The pilot examined joint stablecoin issuance and cross-border payments involving Mitsubishi Corporation’s Japanese and overseas offices.

Advertisement

Mitsubishi UFJ Trust and Banking Corporation handled the planned trust-based issuance structure. Progmat supplied the blockchain infrastructure, while the three banks developed requirements and assessment standards.

The pilot also reviewed legal compliance and user protection. Japan’s Payment Services Act allows stablecoins to operate as regulated electronic payment instruments when issuers meet the required structure and reserve rules.

Japan expands its yen stablecoin market

The joint bank project enters a market that already includes other regulated yen token plans. JPYC launched a yen-backed stablecoin in October 2025, while SBI Holdings and Startale have also prepared an institutional yen stablecoin.

Japan’s ruling Liberal Democratic Party has called for broader use of yen stablecoins, tokenized deposits and round-the-clock settlement. The plan also supports clearer rules for tax payments, wages and corporate uses.

Advertisement

The three-bank project could add a shared settlement route for major corporate clients. Its progress will depend on the council’s final design, regulatory review and connections with existing payment systems.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Crypto World

What next for bitcoin as it faces headwinds from Fed rates to Claude’s Mythos

Published

on

What next for bitcoin as it faces headwinds from Fed rates to Claude's Mythos

Anthropic released Claude Fable 5 on Tuesday, its most capable public model running on Mythos, as it pursues a fall listing it has already filed for confidentially alongside OpenAI, which filed Monday, and SpaceX.

Mythos is Anthropic’s most advanced tier of artificial intelligence models, and Fable is the first publicly released version of this powerful underlying architecture but it comes with strict built-in safety filters.

Bitcoin has spent the past week trading as the high-beta arm of the Nasdaq, sliding with chipmakers and Asian tech as the AI trade unwound. An Anthropic listing, after its $65 billion round at a $965 billion valuation, would hand index funds and retail traders a single AI-lab stock to pile into. Crypto already moves with the AI trade, and giving that trade its own ticker only tightens its grip.

AI-linked tokens caught a modest bid on Fable’s launch while bitcoin barely moved, because model releases are narrative for the sector’s small caps while the majors now trade on what the AI trade does to risk appetite, not on the models themselves.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Crypto World

Ripple joins Matt Damon’s Water.org campaign with RLUSD

Published

on

Ripple architect says XRPL can go underground if states attack

Ripple has joined Water.org’s Get Blue campaign as its exclusive digital asset and payments partner. 

Summary

  • Ripple joins Get Blue as exclusive digital asset and payments partner supporting Water.org’s lending model.
  • RLUSD will help Water.org move funds faster to microfinance partners serving families across emerging markets.
  • Get Blue combines corporate donations with affordable loans for household water and sanitation improvements worldwide.

The blockchain company will provide seed funding and support fund transfers to local finance partners in emerging markets.

Water.org says more than two billion people lack safe water at home. The nonprofit, co-founded by actor Matt Damon and engineer Gary White, uses small loans to help families pay for water and sanitation systems.

Advertisement

Ripple brings RLUSD into the Get Blue campaign

Ripple said Water.org will use its U.S. dollar-backed RLUSD stablecoin to move funds to microfinance partners. Those organizations provide affordable financing for household pipes, pumps, toilets and other basic water systems.

The arrangement builds on Ripple’s existing support for Water.org through Ripple Payments. Water.org says the platform can reduce costs and shorten transfer times when sending capital to partners across different markets.

“We’re proud to join Water.org in support of Get Blue,” Ripple said.

Get Blue named Ripple alongside Amazon, Gap, Starbucks, Ecolab, AccuWeather and TikTok. The campaign first appeared at the World Economic Forum in January and is now moving into a wider consumer rollout.

Ripple-backed WaterCredit turns donations into affordable household loans

Get Blue directs corporate funding and consumer donations into Water.org’s WaterCredit model. Local financial institutions then provide small loans that families use to install safe water or sanitation services at home.

Advertisement

Water.org reports a 98% repayment rate for WaterCredit loans. Repaid funds can support more borrowers, allowing the same pool of capital to finance additional household projects over time.

“When brands join us, they invite their communities into this work,” Water.org CEO Gary White said.

The wider campaign links donations to everyday purchases and services. Gap contributes $5 from each item in its Get Blue collection. Starbucks will donate $0.25 from selected drinks between June 16 and July 7.

RLUSD expands beyond trading and settlement

Ripple launched RLUSD as a stablecoin backed by U.S. dollar deposits, short-term Treasuries and cash equivalents. It operates on the XRP Ledger and Ethereum and supports payments, settlement and other blockchain transactions.

The Water.org partnership adds another humanitarian use for the token. Ripple previously used RLUSD in a drought insurance pilot for pastoral communities in Kenya and committed $25 million to education groups in the U.S.

Advertisement

As crypto.news reported, the education funding supported DonorsChoose and Teach For America. Separate reporting covered RLUSD’s African expansion through Chipper Cash, VALR and Yellow Card for payments and treasury services.

The Get Blue partnership does not disclose how much RLUSD Water.org will receive or which countries will receive the first transfers. Ripple and Water.org have also not published transaction volumes or named the first microfinance recipients.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Crypto World

Ethereum Fear Hits 2026 Extreme as History Points to a Rebound

Published

on

Ethereum (ETH) Price Performance

Ethereum (ETH) social sentiment has collapsed into an extreme fear zone as price continues to slip, down 12% over the past week. Bearish posts now dominate social media as the token trades near $1,626. 

Ethereum (ETH) Price Performance
Ethereum (ETH) Price Performance. Source: BeInCrypto Markets

Santiment data shows the ratio of positive to negative commentary at one of its lowest levels this year. However, the firm suggested this is “where markets become most dangerous for bears.”

Ethereum Fear Reaches the Zone Where Bears Usually Get Trapped

Santiment reported that traders have largely written off Ethereum after months of underperformance against Bitcoin (BTC) and other large-cap assets. 

The cryptocurrency re-entered the extreme fear zone on June 9, with the positive-to-negative commentary ratio near 1.09. The firm noted that this zone has historically acted as a buy signal.

Follow us on X to get the latest news as it happens

Advertisement
Ethereum Social Sentiment
Ethereum Social Sentiment. Source: X/Santiment

The contrast with April is stark. On April 22, the crowd flashed extreme greed with Ethereum above $2,400, which Santiment flagged as an ideal sell point. The token has since lost roughly 32% of its value.

“Historically, Ethereum has tended to rebound when social sentiment reaches extreme FUD levels because prices frequently move opposite to the crowd’s expectations. When traders become overwhelmingly convinced that an asset will continue falling, much of the selling pressure has already been exhausted,” the post read.

Sentiment is not the only flag. Trader Ash Crypto also pointed to another key signal. He compared the current breakdown to June 2022, when ETH collapsed before staging a reversal.

“Back in June 2022, ETH broke through every support level and crashed to $880. Everyone gave up on it. That turned out to be the exact bottom of the whole bear market,” he said.

He argued the current drop mirrors June 2022, sharing the same timing, breakdown, and chart structure. After peaking at $4,953 in August 2025, ETH has fallen sharply. 

The price has broken below its weekly 200-day moving average at $2,471, leaving $1,500 as the next support to watch. 

“Two ways this plays out: If ETH holds $1,500, this could play out exactly like June 2022. The people who bought that bottom made 5x over the next 18 months. If ETH falls below $1,500 on a weekly close, the next support is all the way down near $1,000. Nothing to stop the fall in between,” the analyst added.

ETF Outflows and Oversold Signals Cloud the Rebound Case

Despite these signals, ETH still faces real obstacles. Institutional demand remains weak. SoSoValue data shows ETH spot ETFs have logged outflows for 4 straight weeks, a sign that large investors are still pulling back. 

Advertisement

Until those flows turn positive and hold, any rebound risks fade back into the wider downtrend.

Meanwhile, analyst Ardi warned that in prior bear markets, Ethereum bottoms formed after the weekly Relative Strength Index (RSI) broke below 30. 

“Each time it spent consecutive weeks there, it marked quite literally the exact bottom of the cycle,” the analyst mentioned.

In 2018, after ETH slipped into the territory, prices dropped 63% from $205 to $75. In 2022, ETH dropped 65% from $2,200 to $750.

Advertisement

Ardi noted that ETH has not yet reached oversold territory, with prices below $1,700. Major macro support sits only 15% lower, leaving little cushion.

“If there is a positive to find, it’s that ETH has spent more time in the lower half of the oscillator this cycle than any prior 4-year period. So there is a small possibility that ETH bottoms without RSI deeply breaking that support in the first place,” Ardi added.

The analyst also noted that ETH never staged a true breakout this cycle. As a result, the chart may not require the same violent correction. Even so, Ardi said ETH typically bottoms only when nobody wants to own it, which, in both prior bear markets, meant oversold conditions.

Subscribe to our YouTube channel to watch leaders and journalists provide expert insights

The post Ethereum Fear Hits 2026 Extreme as History Points to a Rebound appeared first on BeInCrypto.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Crypto World

Kraken Joins FIFA World Cup 2026 as Crypto Exchange Sponsor

Published

on

Kraken Joins FIFA World Cup 2026 as Crypto Exchange Sponsor

Kraken has been named the official crypto exchange supporter of the FIFA World Cup 2026, giving the crypto exchange a presence at one of the world’s largest sporting events.

The company said Tuesday that the partnership will include fan activations and product experiences throughout the tournament.

The 2026 World Cup is expected to be the largest in FIFA history, with an expanded field of 48 teams and 104 matches across 16 host cities in the United States, Mexico and Canada. FIFA projects the competition will attract a cumulative global audience of more than 6 billion viewers during its seven-week run.

The partnership places Kraken alongside some of FIFA’s longest-standing corporate sponsors, including Adidas, Coca-Cola, Visa and Hyundai-Kia.

Advertisement

The agreement also expands Kraken’s sports sponsorship efforts, which already include partnerships with Tottenham Hotspur, Atlético de Madrid, RB Leipzig and Atlassian Williams Racing.

The tournament kicks off on June 11 in Mexico City, where Mexico is scheduled to face South Africa at Estadio Azteca.

Source: Kraken

Related: Kraken offers SpaceX IPO access through xStocks

Prediction markets expand their sports presence

The partnership comes four years after the 2022 “Crypto Bowl,” when Coinbase, FTX, Crypto.com and eToro aired advertisements during Super Bowl LVI. Sports marketing activity across the crypto industry slowed following the collapse of FTX later that year and the broader market downturn.

Advertisement

While some digital asset companies have returned to major sporting events, their approach has been more measured. Coinbase aired its first Super Bowl commercial since 2022 during this year’s broadcast, while Crypto.com used the event to launch its AI-focused platform, ai.com.

At the same time, prediction markets, where users buy and sell contracts tied to the likelihood of specific outcomes, have expanded their presence in professional sports.

In November 2025, Polymarket became the official prediction market partner of UFC and Zuffa Boxing under a multiyear agreement that brought prediction market data into live events and broadcasts.

Source: UFC

In January, the company signed a multiyear agreement with Major League Soccer to become the league’s exclusive prediction market partner for MLS and the Leagues Cup. Major League Baseball followed in March, naming Polymarket its official prediction market exchange while signing a separate integrity agreement with the US Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

Advertisement

FIFA’s commercial roster also includes ADI Predict, a blockchain-based prediction market platform backed by Abu Dhabi institutions.

Magazine: Korea probes Polymarket users, crypto PACs sweep primaries: Hodler’s Digest, May 31- June 6

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Crypto World

Crypto Users Wary as Anthropic’s Claude Mythos Goes Live

Published

on

Crypto Users Wary as Anthropic’s Claude Mythos Goes Live

AI company Anthropic on Tuesday released the first public version of its powerful Claude Mythos model, called Fable 5, with some crypto users worried it could be used for malicious purposes, despite embedded guardrails. 

Anthropic said last month that its Mythos model uncovered more than 10,000 high or critical-severity vulnerabilities in “systemically important software,” leading many to question if it should be publicly released.

This was despite the company saying on Tuesday that Fable 5 was “made safe for general use,” and has safeguards that reroute some topics, such as cybersecurity, to a different model, Claude Opus 4.8 

“Releasing a model this capable comes with risks. Without safeguards, Fable 5’s capabilities in areas like cybersecurity could be misused to cause serious damage,” it said.

Advertisement

Source: Claude

The guardrails have done little to reassure crypto users, with AI increasingly being used to attack crypto platforms. In April, the value of crypto stolen in hacks hit $629.7 million, the highest since February 2025, which analysts linked to the use of the technology. 

Mythos release sparks warnings from crypto users

Simon Dedic, founder of the venture firm Moonrock Capital, posted to X on Tuesday that with Fable 5, the “cost and skill required to find exploitable flaws in smart contracts is about to drop to basically zero.”

“For DeFi, this should be a massive wake-up call. Unaudited protocols will become sitting ducks. Known exploits will get replayed on forks around the clock. Even small projects will get targeted simply because trying costs next to nothing now,” he added.

Advertisement

Related: AI agents with crypto could escape and become ‘unstoppable,’ experts warn

Dedic repeated calls online, suggesting that crypto users should protect themselves from the model, including revoking wallet approvals, removing as much value from protocols as possible and moving crypto to fresh hardware wallets.

Curve Finance co-founder Michael Egorov, however, said that the threat Claude Mythos posed to crypto was likely overblown as its success in finding bugs in other software might not translate to funding smart contract vulnerabilities in DeFi. 

In May, Anthropic said Claude Mythos found thousands of critical vulnerabilities in important software through Project Glasswing. For open-source projects, which are central to how crypto protocols are managed, Mythos found around 6,200 high or critical-severity vulnerabilities in more than 1,000 projects it investigated.

Advertisement

Egorov argued that the software Mythos found vulnerabilities in had millions of lines of code, while smart contracts have a few thousand, “and both humans and ‘usual’ AI perfectly fit that code in context and can reason well about it.”

“I suspect we might not be having a wave of DeFi code hacks, but we may see a lot of things in OpSec [operational security] getting hacked (looking like multisig keys compromises) and supply chain attacks on frontend dependencies, and those are way less dangerous in true DeFi,” he said.

Meanwhile, Anthropic said a “small group” of cybersecurity and infrastructure providers would get access to Claude Mythos 5, the same model as Fable 5 but with safeguards lifted in some areas.

Magazine: AI-driven hacks could kill DeFi — unless projects act now

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2025