Connect with us
DAPA Banner

Crypto World

Foundation targets institutions with new privacy framework

Published

on

Foundation targets institutions with new privacy framework

The Solana Foundation is making a new pitch to large institutions: privacy as a customizable feature, not a trade-off.

In a report released on Monday by the foundation, Privacy on Solana: A Full-Spectrum Approach for the Modern Enterprise,” the organization argued that the next phase of crypto adoption will depend less on transparency alone and more on giving companies control over what they reveal — and to whom.

The framing marks a shift from crypto’s early ethos. Public blockchains have traditionally emphasized openness, where transactions are visible and traceable, even if users are represented only by wallet addresses. The report acknowledged that this “pseudonymity” model, while foundational, falls short for many real-world use cases. Financial institutions, for example, may need to prove transactions occurred without exposing counterparties, while companies processing payroll must avoid broadcasting employee salaries.

Underlying the pitch is a technical claim: that Solana’s speed makes advanced privacy techniques practical. The team argued that the network’s high throughput and low latency allow these methods to run at near-web speeds, opening the door to use cases such as encrypted order books or private credit risk calculations.

Advertisement

But rather than offering a single solution for privacy, the foundation presented privacy as a spectrum composed of four distinct modes: pseudonymity, confidentiality, anonymity and fully private systems.

At the base level, pseudonymity keeps identities obscured behind wallet addresses while leaving transaction data visible. Moving along the spectrum, confidentiality allows participants to be known while encrypting sensitive information like balances and transfer amounts.

Anonymity flips that dynamic, hiding the identities of participants while allowing transaction data to remain visible. At the far end are fully private systems, where both identities and transaction data are shielded through techniques like zero-knowledge proofs and multiparty computation.

The message is that no single privacy model fits all. “For enterprises, privacy is a spectrum, not a switch,” the report said.

Advertisement

What Solana is trying to do is bring all of these privacy options into one system. Instead of choosing just one approach, companies can mix and match tools — like hiding transaction amounts, proving something is valid without revealing details, or controlling who can access certain data — depending on what they need.

In practice, that could mean executing trades without revealing order size, sharing risk data across banks without exposing individual balance sheets, or allowing users to prove compliance without disclosing personal information.

The report leans heavily on the idea that privacy and regulation can coexist. The team pointed to mechanisms like “auditor keys,” which enable designated parties to decrypt transactions when required. Other systems would allow wallets to demonstrate compliance status without revealing identity. These features are framed as a response to growing regulatory scrutiny, particularly around anti-money laundering rules and financial surveillance.

“Privacy is a market requirement,” the report said. “Customers expect it and applications require it. On Solana, you choose your privacy level, from encrypted balances to zero-knowledge anonymity to multiparty confidential computing. Each level maps to a compliance path, and each is composable with the broader ecosystem.”

Advertisement

Read more: Solana Foundation’s Liu: Focus on finance, not gaming ‘misadventures’

Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Crypto World

Silver Crashes 50% in 53 Days: Is Jane Street the Firm Behind the Collapse?

Published

on

Brian Armstrong's Bold Prediction: AI Agents Will Soon Dominate Global Financial

TLDR:

  • Silver dropped from $121.64 to $65 in 53 days, with 25% of the loss coming after Jane Street’s filing went public.
  • Jane Street increased its SLV holdings by 500x in Q4 2025, quietly becoming the ETF’s largest shareholder ahead of the crash.
  • SEBI fined Jane Street a record $570M for running a stock-buying scheme in India to profit from larger short options positions.
  • No US regulator has demanded Jane Street’s full derivatives exposure in silver for January 29 and 30, the crash dates.

Silver has lost nearly 50% of its value in just 53 days, dropping from an all-time high of $121.64 to around $65. The sharp decline has drawn attention to Jane Street, a high-frequency trading firm with a documented history of controversial trading practices.

Analysts and market observers are now questioning the firm’s role in the crash, given its massive, undisclosed position in the silver ETF, SLV.

Jane Street’s Hidden Stake in SLV

In Q4 2025, Jane Street quietly accumulated 20.67 million shares of SLV, the world’s most liquid silver ETF. That figure is up from just 41,100 shares the quarter before — a 500x increase.

The position, valued at approximately $1.3 billion, made Jane Street the largest SLV holder, ahead of BlackRock and Morgan Stanley.

This stake was not publicly known while silver was rallying toward its January 29 peak. On January 30, silver collapsed 30% within 30 hours.

Advertisement

That was the worst precious metals crash since 1980. The CME raised margin requirements mid-crash, triggering further cascading liquidations.

The 13F filing revealing Jane Street’s position only became public on February 25. After that disclosure, silver dropped an additional 25%.

As Bull Theory posted on social media, “Silver hit ATH $121.64 on January 29, 2026. Today it sits at $65, a 46% collapse, and 25% of that drop happened AFTER February 25, 2026.”

A Pattern Documented in India and Crypto

Jane Street’s trading practices have already attracted regulatory scrutiny in two other markets. India’s SEBI issued a 105-page order against the firm, resulting in the largest fine in the regulator’s history. SEBI impounded $570 million from Jane Street after finding market manipulation across 18 expiry days.

In those sessions, Jane Street bought large amounts of index stocks in the morning to push prices higher. At the same time, it built short options positions 7.3 times larger than its stock exposure.

By afternoon, it offloaded the stocks, the index fell, and the options paid out. On one day, the firm reportedly lost $7.5 million on stocks while making $89 million on options.

In the crypto market, the bankruptcy administrator for Terraform Labs filed an 83-page federal lawsuit against Jane Street.

Advertisement

The lawsuit alleged the firm used non-public information to avoid over $200 million in losses tied to the $40 billion Terra/LUNA collapse. Blockchain forensics reportedly traced key wallet activity back to Jane Street through Coinbase records.

The Question No Regulator Has Asked

A 13F filing only discloses long equity positions. It does not show short positions, options exposure, or full derivatives books. That gap means Jane Street’s net silver position on January 29 and 30 remains unknown.

The physical silver backing SLV is held by JPMorgan. In 2020, JPMorgan paid $920 million to resolve CFTC charges related to eight years of precious metals market manipulation. That remains the largest CFTC sanction on record.

No US regulator has publicly demanded a full accounting of Jane Street’s complete silver derivatives exposure around the time of the crash.

Advertisement

As Bull Theory noted online, “If the India playbook was running in silver, the $1.3B ETF stake was just the cost. The options position on the other side was the profit.”

None of this has been proven in US courts, though the documented regulatory history raises questions that remain unanswered.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Crypto World

Strategy Unveils New $44B Plan to Fund Bitcoin Purchases

Published

on

Strategy Unveils New $44B Plan to Fund Bitcoin Purchases

Strategy is increasingly turning to perpetual preferred stocks to fund its Bitcoin strategy, with the company adding 90,000 BTC to its balance sheet so far this year.

Michael Saylor’s Strategy has announced several capital-raising programs totaling $44.1 billion to fund Bitcoin purchases, including the sale of common shares and two of its dividend-paying equity vehicles.

Strategy plans to raise up to $21 billion by selling Strategy (MSTR) stock and another $21 billion from its high-yield perpetual preferred stock, Stretch (STRC), via new at-the-market programs, the company said in an 8-K filing to the US Securities and Exchange Commission on Monday.

Advertisement

Strategy also intends to sell up to $2.1 billion worth of Strike (STRK) — another of its perpetual preferred stock offerings. The company didn’t specify a timeline for the issuances, stating that shares may be sold “from time to time.”

Source: Michael Saylor

Strategy has been marketing its securities as a way for investors to gain exposure to Bitcoin, which is currently down nearly 70% from its all-time high. The company is currently carrying an unrealized loss of 6.3% on its Bitcoin holdings.

Strategy’s revised ATM equity program enables it to sell more shares incrementally into the open market rather than relying on fewer large-scale capital raises from external investors, as it previously did through convertible debt. 

Related: Bitcoin spot volumes fall to 2023 lows as BTC rallies remain news-led

Strategy’s preferred stocks, such as STRC and STRK, give investors monthly dividends while enabling Strategy to grow its Bitcoin holdings without issuing additional MSTR common shares.

Advertisement

Strategy added 90K BTC to its treasury in 3 months

Strategy said it bought 1,031 Bitcoin worth $76.6 million in its latest purchase on Monday, adding to its larger-than-usual purchases this month, which include 17,994 Bitcoin on March 9 and 22,337 Bitcoin on March 16 for a combined $2.9 billion.