Connect with us

Crypto World

Institutions Could Fire Bitcoin Devs Over Quantum Fears

Published

on

Crypto Breaking News

Rising concerns about quantum threats to Bitcoin have captured the attention of institutions and veteran investors. In a recent appearance on the Bits and Bips podcast, venture capitalist Nic Carter warned that large holders might grow impatient with developers if action on quantum-resistant cryptography stalls, potentially triggering governance shifts. He argued that a slow pace could prompt major players to replace core contributors with new teams more willing to push forward a solution. The debate centers on risk management, control, and the pace of change at a time when the network remains one of the largest, publicly verifiable assets in the world.

BlackRock, the world’s largest asset manager, is reported to hold around 761,801 BTC, valued at roughly $50.15 billion at publication, accounting for about 3.62% of the circulating supply. The sheer scale of institutional exposure highlights why the question of security upgrades and governance is no longer purely academic. Carter’s provocative framing asks what happens if a consent-based, volunteer-driven development model cannot keep up with the demands of major participants. “If you’re BlackRock and you have billions of dollars of client assets in this thing and its problems aren’t being addressed, what choice do you have?” he asked during the discussion.

That framing has sparked a broader debate within the industry about whether Bitcoin (CRYPTO: BTC) is approaching a tipping point where governance dynamics could shift under institutional pressure. The discussion comes amid a wider conversation about the timing and feasibility of upgrading the network’s cryptographic foundations to resist quantum attacks, a threat some researchers say could become material within the next decade, while others contend the risk is overstated or manageable with incremental steps.

Key takeaways

  • Institutional stakeholders are explicitly weighing governance and development tempo in response to potential quantum threats to Bitcoin’s security model.
  • A number of prominent investors and commentators see the risk as real enough to spur calls for faster action or even new development leadership if progress stalls.
  • One of the largest holders, BlackRock, adds a practical layer of pressure, given the scale of capital that could influence upgrade decisions and strategy for the Bitcoin network.
  • The industry remains divided: some argue the threat is existential and immediate, while others say the concern is theoretical and can be mitigated through measured research and gradual hardening.
  • Proposals and discussions around quantum-resistant cryptography are entering mainstream crypto discourse, with researchers pointing to tangible, albeit gradual, paths forward.

Tickers mentioned: $BTC

Market context: The conversation around quantum risk sits alongside ongoing debates about protocol upgrades, risk management by institutional holders, and the role of governance in a decentralized-but-institutionally-influenced ecosystem. As markets monitor liquidity, macro cues, and regulatory signals, the quantum-resilience question adds a new layer to how investors assess Bitcoin’s security posture and future upgrade trajectories.

Advertisement

Why it matters

The potential for quantum computing to undermine current cryptographic protections touches every layer of Bitcoin—from wallets and transaction verification to the very assumptions underpinning its security model. If the network’s cryptography were shown to be vulnerable, large institutions with significant BTC exposure could demand faster progress toward quantum-resistant schemes, or even push for changes in who controls core development. That possibility — sometimes described as a “corporate takeover” of the upgrade process — would represent a shift in how decentralized networks interact with centralized capital markets and risk managers. Proponents of swifter action argue that delaying a secure upgrade could amplify systemic risk, while skeptics caution against hasty changes that might fracture consensus or introduce new vulnerabilities.

A number of voices in the industry have weighed in on the urgency and feasibility of addressing quantum threats. Austin Campbell, founder of Zero Knowledge Consulting, echoed concerns that if a structural problem exists and large players maintain a long view, they will eventually demand reform or louder participation from the governance and development community. In parallel, other industry figures emphasize a more measured approach, warning against overreaction and highlighting the resilience of Bitcoin’s current security margin. Carter’s assertions that a rapid, market-driven shift could occur if developers don’t move quickly enough contrast with more conservative analyses that quantify the actual exposure and the practical timelines for cryptanalytic breakthroughs.

On the other side of the debate, proponents of the status quo point to long-term research cycles, the complexity of hard-fork upgrades, and the importance of broad consensus across a decentralized ecosystem. They note that a handful of publicized vulnerabilities do not automatically translate into imminent risk and that the path to quantum resilience will likely involve multiple layers of defense, from protocol changes to key management practices and architectural diversification. Notably, researchers at CoinShares and others have sought to quantify risk by examining the number of BTC addresses with vulnerable keys and the distribution of assets among holders, offering a more nuanced picture than headlines alone. This spectrum of views helps explain why the conversation remains contentious rather than resolved.

The market backdrop adds further texture to the debate. Bitcoin’s price action has been volatile in recent weeks, trading near the $70,000 mark at the time of reporting after a period of drawdown. This macro context — combined with an evolving risk appetite among institutional buyers — can influence how quickly stakeholders push for any technical changes. If the quantum risk becomes perceived as a credible, near-term threat, capital flows could shift toward safer hedges or more robust security architectures, potentially affecting liquidity, volatility, and the calculus around new product structures that rely on Bitcoin’s security model.

Advertisement

The tension between urgency and caution also reflects the broader governance challenge that applies to many decentralized networks: when and how to upgrade cryptography in a way that preserves security while maintaining broad participation and network integrity. The debate is not purely academic; it implicates who steers development, how funding is allocated, and what kinds of governance tests are acceptable for a system that prizes decentralization as a foundational principle. As institutions increasingly intersect with Bitcoin’s technical frontier, the next steps—whether they involve formal proposals, research milestones, or new collaboration mechanisms—will be watched closely by miners, custodians, and everyday holders alike.

What to watch next

  • Progress updates on quantum-resistant cryptography proposals within Bitcoin development discussions and any related roadmap milestones.
  • Public statements or filings from major institutions referenced in discussions, including BlackRock’s involvement or commentary on Bitcoin governance and security upgrades.
  • Any new research quantifying quantum risk, particularly metrics around vulnerable keys and potential attack surfaces in exposed wallets.
  • Emerging viewpoints from prominent figures in the space who advocate for faster or slower adoption of quantum-resilience measures and their rationale.

Sources & verification

  • BlackRock’s BTC holdings and value reference on iShares Bitcoin Trust page.
  • CoinShares research outlining the quantum vulnerability landscape for Bitcoin and the count of vulnerable addresses.
  • Bitcoin price data and 30-day performance cited by CoinMarketCap.
  • Remarks from Nic Carter on the Bits and Bips podcast and related discussion threads on X (Twitter).

Quantum risk, governance and the future of Bitcoin

Bitcoin (CRYPTO: BTC) sits at the center of a fraught debate about how quickly the network should respond to the looming threat of quantum computing. In the Bits and Bips discussion, Nic Carter framed a scenario where institutions with billions of dollars at stake could lose patience with a dev community perceived as dragging its feet on a critical upgrade. He warned that the gatekeepers of capital might push for a reconfiguration of development leadership, arguing that “the corporate takeover” could become a practical reality if cryptographic progress remains slow. The assertion is provocative, but it highlights a real tension: the need to balance rapid risk mitigation with the safeguards that come from broad, consensus-driven protocol evolution.

BlackRock’s reported stake in BTC amplifies the significance of this tension. With around 761,801 BTC behind a $50.15 billion position, the firm’s exposure underscores why governance and upgrade decisions in Bitcoin become questions with market-wide consequences. The argument that institutions might actively influence the upgrade path rests not on ideological appeal but on the leverage that comes from asset ownership and the perceived security of client funds. Carter’s question—what choice do institutions have when problems aren’t being addressed—frames this as a practical policy question as much as a technological one.

Yet the Bitcoin ecosystem remains far from a monolithic front. Other voices argue that large holders are primarily passive investors rather than active governance agents, suggesting that the path of protocol evolution will continue to hinge on a combination of developer consensus, open research, and gradual, tested improvements. Austin Campbell and other observers point to a need for vocal stakeholders to participate in technical discussions, ensuring that any shift toward quantum resilience reflects a broad spectrum of interests rather than a single corporate logic. On the other hand, researchers and market observers have presented data suggesting that the immediate threat may be more manageable than headline risk implies, reinforcing the idea that any upgrade will be incremental and guarded by multiple layers of security review.

As the market digests these perspectives, the next few quarters are likely to feature intensified dialogue around cryptographic resilience, governance mechanisms, and the practicalities of deploying quantum-resistant technologies without destabilizing the network. The discussion also reflects a broader trend: institutions increasingly seeking a measurable, verifiable security posture when engaging with crypto assets, and developers striving to preserve decentralization while addressing evolving risk models. The interplay between capital influence and technical progress will continue to shape how Bitcoin navigates this complex risk landscape—an evolution that could redefine how the network balances security, governance, and growth in a dynamic market environment.

Advertisement

Risk & affiliate notice: Crypto assets are volatile and capital is at risk. This article may contain affiliate links. Read full disclosure

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Crypto World

Is Elon Musk Behind Dogecoin’s Latest Double-Digit Surge?

Published

on

DOGEUSD Feb 15. Source: TradingView


DOGE and other meme coins are some of the most impressive gainers during the weekend.

Although most cryptocurrencies have charted notable gains over the past 36 hours or so, Dogecoin is among the top performers, having surged by double digits to over $0.11.

Perhaps the most evident reason behind this rally could be, once again, Elon Musk. This time, though, he hasn’t made a specific DOGE-focused statement as in the past, but rather a broader promise for the entire crypto industry.

Advertisement

In a recent video, the owner of X said the social media platform will allow users to trade stocks and digital assets directly from their timelines. They will be able to interact with ticker symbols in posts and complete trades within the app.

The beta platform is expected to launch within a month or two from X Money, the company’s in-house payments system. Nikita Bier, the firm’s head of product, explained that the goal is to turn the social media behemoth into an “everything app” that allows users to invest, send money, post, and message others.

Given Musk’s history with Dogecoin, it’s no wonder that the OG meme coin has gone on a tear ever since the announcement went live. The asset has consistently risen for the past few days, going from $0.095 to a two-week peak of over $0.115.

DOGEUSD Feb 15. Source: TradingView
DOGEUSD Feb 15. Source: TradingView

It’s worth noting, though, that the billionaire has been quite silent on the Dogecoin endorsement front in the past year or so after some controversial claims that led to lawsuits against him.

Other meme coins have also benefited from the recent market resurgance. PEPE has skyrocketed by 30% daily, while PIPPIN has solidified its spot in the top 100 alts after another 16% surge. Moreover, the asset has rocketed by 270% in the past week.

Advertisement

You may also like:

SPECIAL OFFER (Exclusive)

SECRET PARTNERSHIP BONUS for CryptoPotato readers: Use this link to register and unlock $1,500 in exclusive BingX Exchange rewards (limited time offer).

Source link

Continue Reading

Crypto World

Solana Company Unveils First Digital Asset Treasury for Institutional Borrowing Against Staked SOL

Published

on

21Shares Introduces JitoSOL ETP to Offer Staking Rewards via Solana

TLDR:

  • Solana Company introduces first tri-party custody model allowing borrowing against natively staked SOL tokens. 
  • Anchorage Digital’s Atlas system provides automated collateral management while assets remain in custody. 
  • Institutions earn 7% staking yields on SOL while accessing on-chain liquidity through Kamino’s platform. 
  • The scalable model serves as blueprint for future treasury companies and institutional DeFi participation.

 

Solana Company (NASDAQ: HSDT) announced a partnership with Anchorage Digital and Kamino on February 13, 2026.

The collaboration introduces the first digital asset treasury enabling borrowing against natively staked SOL in qualified custody.

The tri-party custody model allows institutional investors to earn staking rewards while accessing on-chain liquidity. This structure maintains custody, compliance, and operational control for institutional participants.

Tri-Party Custody Model Connects Institutional Capital to DeFi

The partnership brings institutional capital to Solana’s decentralized finance ecosystem through a novel custody arrangement.

Advertisement

Anchorage Digital serves as the collateral manager for natively-staked SOL held in segregated accounts. Institutions can earn staking rewards while simultaneously unlocking borrowing power through Kamino’s lending platform. All assets remain under qualified custody at Anchorage Digital Bank throughout the borrowing process.

Nathan McCauley, CEO and Co-Founder of Anchorage Digital, addressed the institutional demand for this infrastructure. “Institutions want access to the most efficient sources of on-chain liquidity, but they aren’t willing to compromise on custody, compliance, or operational control,” McCauley stated.

He noted that Atlas collateral management allows institutions to keep natively staked SOL with a qualified custodian while using it productively.

This approach brings institutional-grade risk management to Solana’s lending markets, according to the executive.

Advertisement

Anchorage Digital’s Atlas system provides automated oversight of loan-to-value ratios around the clock. The platform orchestrates margin and collateral movements based on predefined rules.

When necessary, the system executes liquidations to protect lenders and borrowers. These features give institutions familiar risk and compliance controls while enabling direct market participation.

Cheryl Chan, Head of Strategy at Kamino, commented on the partnership’s potential. “This collaboration unlocks meaningful institutional demand to borrow against assets held in qualified custody,” Chan explained.

By partnering with Anchorage Digital, Kamino enables institutions to access on-chain liquidity and yield on Solana. The arrangement allows institutions to custody assets within their existing regulated framework.

Advertisement

This removes a barrier that previously limited institutional participation in decentralized lending markets.

Blueprint for Future Treasury Operations and Network Growth

Cosmo Jiang, General Partner at Pantera Capital Management and Board Member at Solana Company, provided his perspective on the structure. “This structure demonstrates how institutional-grade infrastructure can unlock deeper participation on Solana,” Jiang said.

He described it as a strong example of how regulated custody and on-chain borrowing can work together. Jiang believes this scalable model is the blueprint other treasury companies will follow and institutional investors will demand.

The collaboration extends beyond the initial deployment. Other investors, venture firms, and protocols can replicate the structure.

Advertisement

This repeatability positions the model as a standard for institutional participation in protocol borrowing. The framework accommodates various collateral types, from standard digital assets to reward-bearing positions.

Solana has recorded strong network metrics across multiple dimensions. The blockchain processes more than 3,500 transactions per second. Daily active wallets average around 3.7 million users.

The network has surpassed 23 billion transactions year-to-date. SOL offers a native staking yield of approximately 7 percent.

Solana Company operates as an independent treasury company focused on supporting tokenized networks. The firm serves as a long-term holder of SOL tokens.

Advertisement

HSDT continues developing its neurotech and medical device operations alongside its digital asset treasury activities. The company’s mission centers on supporting the growth and security of blockchain networks.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Crypto World

Analysis Puts Bitcoin Price ‘Ultimate’ Bear Market Bottom Near $55,000

Published

on

Analysis Puts Bitcoin Price ‘Ultimate’ Bear Market Bottom Near $55,000

Bitcoin may not have hit true capitulation yet. On chain analytics firm CryptoQuant is warning that the real bear market floor could sit closer to $55,000. That is lower than many bulls want to admit.

If their data is right, the market still has some pain to process before a proper structural base forms. Weak hands may not be fully flushed. And until that final reset happens, calling this the ultimate bottom might be a bit premature.

Key Takeaways

  • CryptoQuant data suggests the “ultimate” bear market bottom is near $55,000 based on realized price models.
  • Bitcoin recently saw $5.4 billion in realized losses on Feb. 5, the highest since March 2023.
  • Key valuation metrics like MVRV and NUPL have not yet reached historical capitulation zones.

Is The Selling Finally Over?

CryptoQuant says we are still in a normal bear phase, not the extreme panic zone that usually marks once in a cycle buying opportunities. In their view, bottoms are not single candles. They are long, messy processes that take time to build.

Meanwhile, price action keeps slipping. ETF outflows are stacking up and Bitcoin losing $66,000 has traders nervous. But according to the data, we still have not seen the kind of pain that typically resets the market.

Advertisement
Source: Coinglass

Bitcoin price is trading more than 25% above its realized price, a level that has historically acted as strong support.

In past cycles like 2018 and the FTX collapse, Bitcoin bottomed 24% to 30% below realized price. If that pattern plays out again, the $55,000 area becomes the zone to watch.

Realized Losses And Valuation Metrics

The latest CryptoQuant data shows real damage under the surface.

On February 5, Bitcoin holders locked in $5.4 billion in daily losses as price slid 14% to $62,000. That was the biggest single day loss since March 2023.

Advertisement

But even with those numbers, key valuation metrics are not flashing full bottom yet.

The MVRV ratio has not dropped into the extreme undervalued zone that usually shows up at cycle lows. The NUPL metric also has not hit the deep unrealized loss levels that typically mark capitulation.

Source: CryptoQuant

Long term holders tell a similar story. Right now, many are selling around breakeven. In past bear market bottoms, they were sitting on losses of 30% to 40%.

If history is any guide, the final phase of capitulation may require a deeper reset before a durable floor forms. Until then, patience may prove more valuable than premature bottom calls.

If Bitcoin Needs Another Reset, Bitcoin Hyper Does Not

Advertisement

When analysts start talking about “true capitulation,” it means one thing. Bitcoin could stay slow and heavy for longer than bulls expect.

That is not the environment for explosive base-layer moves.

Bitcoin Hyper ($HYPER) is built for momentum regardless of where BTC chops. This Bitcoin-focused Layer-2, powered by Solana technology, adds speed, lower fees, and real on-chain utility without touching Bitcoin core security.

Bitcoin Hyper is already gaining traction. The presale has raised over $31 million so far, with $HYPER priced at $0.0136751 before the next increase, plus staking rewards up to 37%.

Advertisement

If Bitcoin needs more time to bottom, Bitcoin Hyper is positioned to move during the wait.

Visit the Official Bitcoin Hyper Website Here

The post Analysis Puts Bitcoin Price ‘Ultimate’ Bear Market Bottom Near $55,000 appeared first on Cryptonews.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Crypto World

Elon Musk’s X to Launch Smart Cashtags Enabling In-App Stock and Crypto Trading

Published

on

Elon Musk’s X to Launch Smart Cashtags Enabling In-App Stock and Crypto Trading

Elon Musk’s social media platform X is preparing to roll out a feature that could transform the app from a discussion forum into a trading venue.

Key Takeaways:

  • X plans to launch Smart Cashtags allowing users to trade stocks and cryptocurrencies directly in posts.
  • The feature advances Musk’s vision of turning X into an all-in-one financial and social platform.
  • It will roll out alongside X Money, a peer-to-peer payments system currently in beta testing.

Nikita Bier, X’s head of product, said the company plans to introduce “Smart Cashtags,” a tool that will allow users to buy and sell stocks and cryptocurrencies directly from their timelines.

The feature is expected to arrive within weeks, according to a post published Saturday.

X To Roll Out Smart Cashtags Enabling Stock And Crypto Trades From Posts

Advertisement

“We are launching a number of features in a couple of weeks, including Smart Cashtags that will enable you to trade stocks and crypto directly from the timeline,” Bier wrote.

Bier had previously hinted at the feature in January, sharing an image showing trading functionality embedded in posts, but the company had not confirmed the details at the time.

X previously experimented with financial features. In 2022, it added a basic Cashtag system that displayed price charts and market data for major assets such as Bitcoin and Ether.

Users could view market movements inside posts, though the feature only tracked prices and did not enable transactions. The earlier system was later discontinued.

Advertisement

The planned trading capability would mark a major shift for the platform, which already hosts a large share of online crypto conversation. Allowing direct transactions would move X beyond information sharing and into financial services.

The development aligns with Musk’s long-standing plan to turn X into an “everything app,” comparable to China’s WeChat, where messaging, payments and services operate in one place.

The trading feature comes alongside X Money, a peer-to-peer payments system. Speaking during a presentation at his artificial intelligence company xAI, Musk said the payment tool is currently in limited beta testing and could expand globally after the trial period.

Advertisement

“This is intended to be the place where all money is — the central source of monetary transactions,” Musk said.

According to Musk, the platform reaches roughly 600 million monthly users.

X Cracks Down on Crypto-Linked Engagement Apps

As reported, X has recently come under scrutiny after restricting API access for so-called InfoFi and engagement-reward projects, many of which were tied to crypto incentives.

Advertisement

The company said it would no longer allow apps that reward users for posting or interacting on X, citing concerns over AI-generated spam and manipulation.

Beyond crypto, X’s broader AI strategy has drawn regulatory attention, particularly in Europe, where authorities have raised concerns about Grok’s image-generation features.

The platform has since limited certain capabilities and introduced safeguards after investigations were launched.

X’s decision to clamp down on so-called InfoFi applications sent fresh shockwaves through the crypto market, dragging several tokens sharply lower and forcing a rethink across a niche that had grown tightly intertwined with the social media platform.

Advertisement

The immediate market reaction was led by KAITO, the token linked to the Kaito platform, which slid roughly 20% in a single day as investors digested what many saw as a structural threat rather than a short-term policy tweak.

The post Elon Musk’s X to Launch Smart Cashtags Enabling In-App Stock and Crypto Trading appeared first on Cryptonews.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Crypto World

Low Volume Breakouts: Why Markets Whisper Before They Roar

Published

on

21Shares Introduces JitoSOL ETP to Offer Staking Rewards via Solana

TLDR:

  • Institutional buyers accumulate positions quietly before breakouts occur, absorbing supply inside bases 
  • Volume reduction before breakouts signals stored energy rather than weakness in underlying price trends 
  • Momentum funds and retail traders enter after performance becomes visible, creating delayed volume spikes 
  • Breakout timing context matters more than immediate volume confirmation for predicting trend sustainability

 

Low volume breakouts often face skepticism from traders who follow conventional technical analysis rules. The standard teaching suggests strong volume must accompany price breakouts for validation.

However, market history reveals a different pattern where volume frequently arrives after the breakout occurs. Technical analyst Aksel Kibar recently examined this phenomenon, noting that markets often move quietly before attracting broader participation.

This observation challenges widely accepted assumptions about volume requirements during breakout formations.

Institutional Accumulation Precedes Public Recognition

Market structure explains why breakouts occur without immediate volume expansion. Institutional investors typically build positions within consolidation ranges before prices break higher.

Advertisement

These buyers accumulate shares gradually when public interest remains low. Supply gets absorbed during this quiet phase, creating conditions for easier price movement.

Technical research supports the concept of volume reduction before breakouts. This pattern reflects stored energy rather than weakness in the underlying trend.

Price can advance with minimal participation because resistance has already been removed. The breakout itself represents recognition of a shift rather than the beginning of participation.

Early positioning by informed buyers means fewer shares remain available when prices break out. The lack of sellers allows price to move higher without requiring heavy volume.

Advertisement

This dynamic contradicts the traditional view that volume must confirm every breakout immediately. Markets can transition from accumulation to markup phase with relatively light trading activity.

The concept of “volume dry-up” before breakouts appears frequently in technical literature. Reduced trading activity can signal preparation for a move rather than disinterest.

When supply has been absorbed and sellers have exited, prices move freely on modest volume. This phase often precedes substantial trends that develop over subsequent weeks or months.

Market Stages Reveal Delayed Volume Patterns

Technical analyst Aksel Kibar noted on social media that breakout performance should consider context beyond the initial moment.

Advertisement

His analysis identifies three distinct stages in market behavior following consolidation patterns. The initial breakout stage often shows limited participation from retail traders and momentum investors.

Performance becomes visible as the trend develops and price gains become measurable. Momentum-focused funds enter positions after trends establish themselves through consistent price action.

Retail participation follows as media coverage expands and investment narratives gain traction. This sequence explains why volume peaks occur after breakouts rather than during them.

Studies examining breakout patterns reveal that timing matters more than immediate volume confirmation. Some quiet breakouts evolve into sustained trends while high-volume breakouts occasionally mark exhaustion points. The relationship between volume and price depends on market phase and participant behavior.

Advertisement

Recognition that volume confirms participation rather than initiating moves changes how traders evaluate breakouts. Markets demonstrate strength through sustained price advancement regardless of initial volume levels.

Historical patterns show that whisper-quiet beginnings can precede powerful trends. The sequence of accumulation, breakout, and expansion follows a logical progression that volume data reflects over time.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Crypto World

Why Multiple Resistance Tests Actually Increase Breakout Probability: Technical Analyst Reveals Market Truth

Published

on

21Shares Introduces JitoSOL ETP to Offer Staking Rewards via Solana

TLDR:

  • Each resistance test removes sell liquidity, gradually weakening the barrier rather than strengthening it. 
  • Short positions accumulate above tested resistance, creating stop-loss clusters that fuel explosive breakouts. 
  • Horizontal resistance levels with three or more touches demonstrate institutional recognition and setup quality. 
  • Repeated price returns to resistance signal market acceptance and persistent demand, not rejection behavior.

 

Breakout probability increases with multiple tests at resistance levels, contrary to traditional technical analysis teachings.

Technical analyst Aksel Kibar challenges conventional market wisdom in a detailed explanation of modern market dynamics. The analysis focuses on liquidity pools, order flow, and auction theory.

Classical teachings suggest resistance strengthens with repeated failures. However, market behavior demonstrates the opposite trend through systematic liquidity depletion. Each test removes available sell orders and transfers inventory from sellers to buyers.

Liquidity Depletion Weakens Resistance Over Time

Resistance levels function as liquidity pools rather than solid barriers. Modern markets reveal these zones contain clusters of limit orders and resting sell liquidity.

Advertisement

Each price movement into resistance consumes available sell orders through transactions. This process gradually removes supply from the level.

The technical analyst compares resistance to ice being chipped away with each touch. Every test fills sell orders and reduces available supply at that price point.

Eventually, insufficient sellers remain to maintain the resistance level. This creates conditions favorable for eventual breakouts.

Buyers consistently absorb demand at these levels through repeated transactions. The inventory transfers from sellers to buyers during each test. This systematic reduction in available supply makes future breakouts structurally easier to achieve.

Advertisement

Short Positions Create Breakout Fuel Above Resistance

Market participants tend to initiate new short positions after repeated failures at resistance. Confidence in the level grows with each rejection, leading to tighter stop-loss clustering above. This accumulation of stops creates latent energy that fuels eventual breakouts.

When resistance finally breaks, short sellers must cover their positions simultaneously. Breakout traders and momentum participants enter the market at the same time. This combination creates a liquidity vacuum that accelerates price movement upward.

Aksel Kibar notes on his platform that strong breakouts frequently occur after multiple failed attempts. The concentration of stop-loss orders above well-tested levels amplifies the breakout move. This pattern explains why persistent testing often leads to decisive directional moves.

Horizontal Boundaries Signal Institutional Recognition

Horizontal levels carry particular significance in technical analysis, according to the analyst. These boundaries indicate institutional recognition and shared market memory across time periods. Multiple touches increase participant awareness and order clustering around these levels.

Advertisement

The analyst emphasizes mature chart patterns with a minimum of three touch points to pattern boundaries. This selection criterion improves signal quality and setup probability in trading decisions. Horizontal patterns from global exchanges demonstrate this principle consistently.

Markets operate as auction systems where repeated price returns signal ongoing negotiation. Persistence at specific levels indicates acceptance behavior rather than rejection.

Strong markets build bases through consolidation near resistance before continuation moves. This base-building process incorporates multiple tests as part of the natural market structure.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Crypto World

Senators Urge CFIUS Probe of $500M UAE Stake in Trump-Linked WLFI

Published

on

Senators Urge CFIUS Probe of $500M UAE Stake in Trump-Linked WLFI

Two US senators are pressing the Treasury Department to investigate a reported foreign investment in a crypto venture tied to the Trump family, raising concerns about national security, foreign influence and access to sensitive financial data.

In a Friday letter to Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, Massachusetts Senator Elizabeth Warren and New Jersey Senator Andy Kim asked the government to determine whether the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS) should investigate a deal in which a UAE–backed investment vehicle agreed to purchase a 49% stake in World Liberty Financial (WLFI) for roughly $500 million.

The lawmakers wrote that the transaction reportedly occurred days before Donald Trump’s inauguration and would make the foreign fund the firm’s largest shareholder and its only publicly known outside investor. They asked Bessent, who chairs CFIUS, to confirm whether the committee was notified and, if necessary, conduct a “comprehensive, thorough, and unbiased investigation.”

The investment was reportedly backed by Sheikh Tahnoon bin Zayed Al Nahyan, the UAE’s national security adviser. The agreement allegedly directed about $187 million to entities linked to the Trump family and granted two board seats to executives connected to G42, a technology company previously scrutinized by US intelligence agencies over concerns about ties to China, per the letter.

Advertisement

Related: Trump Media files for two new crypto ETFs tied to Bitcoin, Ether, Cronos

UAE stake could expose Americans’ financial and personal data

Warren and Kim argued that the structure of the deal could allow a foreign government to gain influence over a US company handling financial and personal information. They noted that the firm’s privacy disclosures indicate it collects data including wallet addresses, IP addresses, device identifiers and approximate location data, along with certain identity records through service providers.

CFIUS is tasked with reviewing foreign investments that could provide access to sensitive technologies or personal data belonging to US citizens. The lawmakers requested answers by March 5.

Senators ask Bessent to answer questions. Source: Senate

Last year, Senators Warren and Jack Reed also called on US authorities to investigate alleged links between World Liberty Financial’s token sales and sanctioned foreign actors. In a Nov. letter to the Justice Department and Treasury, they cited claims that WLFI governance tokens were bought by blockchain addresses tied to North Korea’s Lazarus Group, as well as Russian- and Iranian-linked entities.

Related: Trump family’s WLFI plans FX and remittance platform: Report

Advertisement

Trump says sons handle WLFI investment

Earlier this month, US President Donald Trump said he was unaware of the reported multimillion-dollar investment tied to an Abu Dhabi royal and entities connected to the World Liberty Financial crypto platform.