Connect with us
DAPA Banner

Crypto World

Stablecoin Crypto Supply Hits $315B in Q1 as USDC Gains, USDT Slips

Published

on

Stablecoin Crypto Supply Hits $315B in Q1 as USDC Gains, USDT Slips

Total stablecoin supply reached a record $315 billion in Q1 2026, rising roughly $8 billion quarter-over-quarter even as the broader crypto market contracted.

The headline figure masks a sharper story underneath: USDC is taking ground from USDT, and the gap is closing faster than most market participants expected.

USDC supply surged 220% since late 2023 to approximately $78 billion, driven by institutional B2B settlement, payroll infrastructure, and programmatic payment rails built by Visa and Stripe.

USDT, still the dominant issuer by raw supply, saw its share slip – a divergence CEX.IO flagged as one of the quarter’s defining market dynamics.

Advertisement
Key Takeaways:
  • Total stablecoin supply hit a record $315B in Q1 2026, up ~$8B QoQ – the slowest growth since Q4 2023, but still expansion during a market contraction.
  • Stablecoins accounted for 75% of total crypto trading volume in Q1 – the highest share on record.
  • Total stablecoin transaction volume topped $28 trillion, exceeding Visa and Mastercard combined.
  • USDC supply surged 220% since late 2023 to ~$78B; USDT’s market share slipped amid the divergence.
  • Retail-sized transfers fell 16% – the steepest drop on record – while bots drove approximately 76% of all stablecoin transaction volume.
  • Yield-bearing stablecoins now represent a $3.7 billion subsector, introducing new fragmentation and regulatory risk.

Discover: The best crypto to diversify your portfolio during market turbulence

Stablecoins also captured 75% of total crypto trading volume in Q1 – the highest share on record – while total transaction volume topped $28 trillion, a figure that now regularly exceeds those of major payment networks like Visa and Mastercard combined. Growth rate slowing is real; demand evaporating is not.

USDC Gain Is a Regulatory Story, Not Just a Market Share Story

The USDC surge is not organic retail adoption. CEX.IO’s data points to institutional programmatic money – B2B corridors, payroll settlement, treasury management, as the primary driver.

Advertisement

USDC’s transaction velocity hit 90x with an average transfer size of $557, a profile consistent with frequent, smaller institutional transactions rather than whale moves.

Source: CEX.IO Research

Circle’s positioning ahead of potential U.S. stablecoin legislation has been deliberate. With the Clarity for Payment Stablecoins Act still under debate and regulatory frameworks for digital assets evolving in Washington, regulated issuers like Circle have a structural advantage in onboarding compliance-sensitive institutional capital. That distinction matters – it’s not market share gained on yield or liquidity depth alone.

Analysts reviewing the quarter described the shift bluntly: “This isn’t retail adoption; it’s institutional programmatic money.” The number that confirms it is USDC’s average transfer size of $557 – dwarfed in absolute terms by USDT’s larger individual trades, but indicative of high-frequency, automated institutional flows that mirror broader tokenization and institutional adoption trends reshaping digital asset infrastructure.

If U.S. stablecoin legislation passes with provisions favoring regulated, audited issuers, USDC’s gain becomes structural. If it stalls, the competitive edge narrows and USDT’s entrenched liquidity depth reasserts dominance.

USDT Still Leads – But the Competitive Moat Is Narrowing

Advertisement

USDT remains the largest stablecoin by supply and the dominant liquidity instrument across emerging market corridors and Tron-based DeFi.

Its concentration on Tron, where low fees drive retail and cross-border transfer volume, gives it a user base that USDC’s Ethereum-centric institutional footprint doesn’t directly compete with. Yet.

The Q1 slip in USDT’s market share comes alongside the steepest recorded drop in retail-sized transfers – down 16% – which cuts at one of USDT’s core use cases.

Simultaneously, bots now account for approximately 76% of all stablecoin transaction volume, meaning the organic retail demand that historically anchored USDT’s dominance in high-frequency small-value transfers is contracting.

Advertisement
Source: CEX.IO

CEX.IO flagged this as evidence of “a more sophisticated, but potentially less organic, market structure.”

Tether’s response has been limited to quarterly reserve attestations and geographic expansion rather than product-level innovation. That’s a defensible posture while it holds network effects.

It becomes a liability if institutional capital flows continue rotating into regulated instruments and USDC’s programmatic integrations deepen across Western payment infrastructure.

Watch Circle’s May attestation and Tether’s Q2 report for whether the supply divergence widens. If USDC crosses $90 billion while USDT stagnates, this quarter’s share shift stops looking like a blip and starts looking like a trend.

The $315 billion total supply figure tells you stablecoins are the market’s load-bearing layer. The USDC/USDT split tells you who’s building on top of it.

Advertisement

Explore: The best pre-launch token sales with asymmetric upside potential

The post Stablecoin Crypto Supply Hits $315B in Q1 as USDC Gains, USDT Slips appeared first on Cryptonews.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Crypto World

Who’s Really Holding Wall Street’s Crypto?

Published

on

Wall Street’s crypto footprint has never been larger. BlackRock alone reported nearly $150 billion in digital asset-linked AUM in its 2026 chairman’s letter. Public companies hold over 1.1 million BTC on their balance sheets. Institutions disclose more than 513,000 BTC through ETF wrappers.

Yet aggregate numbers obscure the question that matters most. Who actually holds what, through which infrastructure, and why?

This article maps Wall Street’s crypto ownership across five layers.

It starts with SEC 13F filings, moves through corporate balance sheets, follows the money into tokenized fund rails, traces the custodial chokepoints where keys concentrate, and ends where filings go dark, with on-chain OTC flows that reveal holders no quarterly report captures.

Advertisement

SEC 13F Filings Reveal Secrets About Wall Street Crypto ETF Holdings

Despite a 23% price decline in Q4 2025, global Bitcoin ETF flows remained positive at $3.7 billion. Full-year professional ETF ownership grew 32% versus 18% for the broader ETF investor base.

Institutions still held over 513,000 BTC through ETFs, though filer count declined from 2,173 to 1,867.

Net Wall Street crypto Filers
Net Filers: Bitcoin Strategy

Not all of this is conviction capital. The basis trade, a strategy involving a long spot ETF position paired with a short CME futures position, has been a primary institutional strategy since ETF approval.

Hedge fund exposure declined nearly 10% in Q4, as leverage unwound and the basis spread narrowed.

13F Filer Holdings by Institution Type
13F Filer Holdings by Institution Type: CoinShares

Cohort rotation, not capitulation, defined Q4. Millennium added 8,100 BTC. Abu Dhabi’s Mubadala added 2,300 BTC. Morgan Stanley added 1,900 BTC. Dartmouth became the fourth Ivy League endowment to enter.

On the other hand, Brevan Howard cut 17,700 BTC, Harvard trimmed roughly 20%, and Royal Bank of Canada fully exited, all of which are mentioned in the CoinShares Q4 2025 report.

Advertisement

Aggregate pension fund and endowment crypto holdings peaked at $1.48 billion in Q3 2025, then declined to $965 million in Q4.

However, ETFs only reveal who is buying the wrapper. For those who are holding the asset itself, the balance sheets tell a different story.

Corporate Treasuries Show Who Holds Bitcoin Directly on the Balance Sheet

Beyond ETFs, a growing number of public companies hold Bitcoin directly as a treasury reserve asset. As of March 31, 2026, publicly traded companies report a combined 1,134,324 BTC on their balance sheets.

Bitcoin Treasury Companies
Bitcoin Treasury Companies: BitcoinMiningStock

The concentration is extreme. Strategy Inc, formerly MicroStrategy, held 762,000 BTC as of April 2, 2026. Other big names in the space include Twenty One Capital, MARA Holdings, Japan’s Metaplanet, and more.

Treasury Companies
Treasury Companies: Bitcoin Treasuries

New entrants are reshaping the picture. Trump Media (DJT) held 11,542 BTC before pledging 2,000 BTC as collateral under a hedge arrangement with rehypothecation rights, reducing on-balance-sheet holdings to 9,542 BTC. MARA sold 15,133 BTC in March 2026 at a loss to service debt.

Yet corporate treasuries only account for direct spot ownership. Wall Street’s largest players are building crypto exposure through an entirely different mechanism, one that does not require holding a single Bitcoin.

Tokenized Funds and RWA Holdings Show Where On-Chain Meets TradFi

Some of Wall Street’s largest firms now build crypto exposure without holding a single token. Instead, they put traditional assets on-chain through tokenization.

BlackRock’s BUIDL fund, a tokenized US Treasury money market product, reached $2.85 billion in total assets ($2.17 billion at press time).

In February 2026, BlackRock began trading BUIDL on Uniswap’s decentralized exchange and purchased UNI governance tokens. That marked its first direct engagement with DeFi trading infrastructure.

Advertisement

The firm’s 2026 chairman’s letter reported $65 billion in stablecoin reserves, $80 billion in digital-asset ETPs, and nearly $150 billion in total digital asset-linked AUM.

The broader market is scaling fast. RWA.xyz data as of April 2026 shows $12.67 billion in on-chain US Treasury debt, representing roughly 46% of the total $27.59 billion in tokenized real-world assets.

That total RWA figure grew 31.61% in just the last 30 days alone, with 708,377 asset holders across the ecosystem.

BUIDL Tokenized Fund AUM Growth
BUIDL Tokenized Fund AUM Growth: RWA.xyz

This is Wall Street holding crypto infrastructure, not crypto assets. However, all of it depends on one thing. Who has the keys.

The Custody Map Reveals a Single Point of Failure

Knowing who owns Wall Street’s crypto is only half the picture. The other half is who holds the keys.

Advertisement

Coinbase custodies over 80% of US Bitcoin and Ethereum ETF assets, a figure confirmed by CEO Brian Armstrong. Coinbase was the custodian for eight of the 11 spot Bitcoin ETF listings at launch. Only Fidelity self-custodies its own fund. VanEck selected Gemini.

This concentration creates a single-cluster dependency. A cyber incident, service disruption, or governance failure at one custodian could affect multiple funds simultaneously, with knock-on effects for creations, redemptions, and trading liquidity.

On the tokenized side, Bank of New York Mellon serves as BUIDL’s cash and securities custodian, while Anchorage Digital, BitGo, Copper, and Fireblocks support BUIDL subscribers.

As of March 2026, discussions are emerging around multi-party computation custody and multi-custodian mandates to spread risk. No structural changes have materialized yet.

Advertisement

The custody map reveals a paradox at the heart of Wall Street’s crypto exposure. A decentralized asset class funneled through increasingly centralized infrastructure. And that infrastructure still leaves major holders invisible, specifically those with no filing obligation at all.

The Shadow Holders and What No Filing Can Show

13F filings only apply to US institutional managers with over $100 million in qualifying assets. Family offices, offshore entities, and sovereign vehicles operating through intermediaries are not subject to disclosure obligations.

That creates a structural blind spot in Wall Street’s map of crypto ownership.

On-chain data reveals what filings cannot.

Advertisement

Cumberland DRW, one of Wall Street’s primary OTC desks, has processed a total of $123.58 billion in deposits and $97.71 billion in withdrawals across major exchanges since 2018.

Cumberland DRW Entity Overview
Cumberland DRW Entity Overview: Arkham

Filtering Cumberland’s outflows reveals where institutional capital actually goes. The top all-time outflow destinations include $17 billion to Binance, $14.53 billion to Coinbase Prime, likely for ETF creations, and $10.12 billion to Block Inc..

Top Outflow Counterparties
Top Outflow Counterparties:Arkham

Scrolling further down the counterparty list confirms additional ETF and institutional plumbing. Fidelity’s FBTC ETF inflows appear at $7.28 billion across 171 transactions.

Outflow Counterparties Continued
Outflow Counterparties Continued: Arkham

Alongside these labeled flows sit billions more directed to unlabeled wallets. The single largest unlabeled BTC recipient, wallet bc1qcyau..., received $8.75 billion across 386 transactions.

It currently holds 593 BTC and uses Copper’s institutional prime brokerage for custody.

That pattern, large OTC sourcing through a Wall Street trading firm paired with institutional-grade prime brokerage custody, is exactly the profile of a family office or sovereign vehicle operating through the same infrastructure as ETF issuers, just without the filing obligation.

Hidden wall street player
Possible Family Office With Copper Custody: Arkham

The filings show part of the answer. The chain shows the rest.

The gap between the two hides durable demand from shadow holders who bought through a drawdown and still hold through institutional custody, suggesting deeper structural support than any ETF tracker captures.

Advertisement

That same gap also hides an untracked concentration that could crack it.

The post Who’s Really Holding Wall Street’s Crypto? appeared first on BeInCrypto.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Crypto World

Bitcoin Whales and Sharks Record $30.9B Losses Amid Q1 2026 Market Sell-Off

Published

on

Brian Armstrong's Bold Prediction: AI Agents Will Soon Dominate Global Financial

TLDR:

  • Bitcoin whales and sharks recorded over $30.9B in losses, averaging $337M daily in Q1 2026.
  • Early February saw peak capitulation, with realized losses hitting $1.6B in a single day.
  • Large holders led the sell-off, showing institutional-level distribution during market stress.
  • Market stabilized post-February, with reduced losses and BTC trading within a tight range.

Bitcoin’s largest holders recorded steep realized losses during the first quarter of 2026, reflecting sustained selling pressure across major wallet groups. On-chain data shows whales and sharks collectively locked in over $30.9 billion in losses during the period.

Heavy Losses Driven by Early February Sell-Off

Glassnode data shared in a recent post on X by Coin Bureau pointed to an intense wave of selling in early February.

During this period, realized losses surged to nearly $1.6 billion in a single day. At the same time, Bitcoin’s price dropped sharply, signaling a coordinated market reaction.

Large holders played a central role in this movement. Wallets holding between 100 and 1,000 BTC recorded average daily losses of $188.5 million.

Meanwhile, wallets with 1,000 to 10,000 BTC posted daily losses of $147.5 million. Together, these groups accounted for a combined daily average of $337 million in realized losses.

This pattern suggests that selling activity was not limited to smaller participants. Instead, it involved entities often associated with institutional capital or long-term investors. The scale of these losses points to a broad liquidation phase rather than isolated exits.

Advertisement

At the same time, long-term holders continued to realize losses of nearly $200 million per day. This added further pressure to the market during the quarter. The combined effect marked the heaviest realized losses since the 2022 bear market.

Market Stabilizes as Selling Pressure Eases

Following the sharp downturn in early February, market conditions began to shift. Realized losses dropped into a lower range, typically between $200 million and $600 million per day. This change coincided with Bitcoin’s price stabilizing between $65,000 and $75,000.

As the weeks progressed, the market entered a consolidation phase. Price movements became more controlled, while large-scale panic selling appeared to subside. However, smaller spikes in realized losses continued to appear throughout March.

These repeated spikes reflected ongoing exits from weaker market participants. At the same time, price action remained choppy, with no clear directional trend. Both buyers and sellers appeared active, yet neither side gained sustained control.

Advertisement

By the end of March, realized losses had settled at moderate levels, ranging between $300 million and $500 million. This steady pattern suggested a more balanced environment compared to the earlier volatility.

The data shows that extreme selling conditions eased after the initial shock. Still, the presence of continued losses indicates that market confidence has not fully returned.

The absence of another major spike suggests a pause in aggressive selling rather than a complete shift in sentiment.

Overall, the first quarter of 2026 reflects a transition from heavy liquidation to a more stable but uncertain market phase.

Advertisement

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Crypto World

Grayscale Says 5 Altcoins Are at ‘Buy Zone’ Levels

Published

on

Grayscale Investments posted consecutive endorsements of Sui (SUI) this week, praising its programming model for institutional use while calling current altcoin prices a potential buying opportunity.

The asset manager highlighted SUI alongside Ethereum (ETH), Solana (SOL), Chainlink (LINK), and Avalanche (AVAX) as tokens trading at historically low levels.

Why Grayscale Is Targeting SUI Now

Grayscale argues that financial institutions need speed, efficiency, and reliability, and highlights SUI’s programming model, built to preserve security while scaling performance.

It follows a recent post in which Grayscale Research called current altcoin levels a potentially attractive entry point.

“Grayscale Research believes that the current levels for leading altcoins like ETH, SOL, LINK, SUI, and AVAX, amongst others, offer a potentially compelling entry point,” they said.

Head of Research Zach Pandl expanded on the thesis in a separate report. He noted that the firm’s altcoin basket has fallen roughly 59% from its highs and gained only 2% from its lows since the January 2024 launch of the firm’s crypto ETP.

Pandl also pointed to relative strength in crypto markets during March. While the S&P 500 fell about 5%, the Grayscale Crypto Sectors Index rose about 4%.

“Current levels for leading altcoins…are quite compelling,” read an excerpt in the Grayscale report.

Broader Institutional Context

Grayscale’s SUI conviction extends beyond research. The firm recently launched its GSUI staking ETF on NYSE Arca and also operates trusts for SUI ecosystem tokens DeepBook and Walrus.

Advertisement

That makes SUI one of Grayscale’s deepest single-ecosystem bets outside Bitcoin and Ethereum.

SUI Price Performance.
SUI Price Performance. Source: BeInCrypto

SUI currently trades near $0.87, having dropped over 80% from its cycle peak above $5.36.

Whether Grayscale’s repeated backing helps establish a floor at these levels will depend on whether institutional capital follows the firm’s public thesis.

The post Grayscale Says 5 Altcoins Are at ‘Buy Zone’ Levels appeared first on BeInCrypto.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Crypto World

XRP Price Prediction: Ripple’s 5B Token Reserve Hits Record as Pepeto Presale Goes Viral With $8.68M Raised

Published

on

XRP Price Prediction: Ripple's 5B Token Reserve Hits Record as Pepeto Presale Goes Viral With $8.68M Raised

The xrp price prediction just absorbed its most significant supply event in months after Ripple unlocked 1 billion XRP worth $1.34 billion from escrow on April 1 and relocked 700 million the following day, pushing spendable reserves to 5 billion tokens for the first time, surpassing every monthly average from 2025, according to U.Today. With 300 million XRP now free to enter circulation, the supply overhang adds weight to a token already stuck in a tight range near $1.31.

But while XRP builds a case that could take years to fully play out, a different project has pulled $8.68 million in presale capital from wallets that recognized something the wider market has not priced in yet, and the fundamentals behind that conviction deserve attention before the listing reprices everything.

Ripple Pushes Spendable XRP to Record 5 Billion as Supply Pressure Builds

Ripple executed its scheduled escrow release on April 1 in two transactions of 500 million XRP each, then relocked 700 million on April 2, leaving approximately 300 million tokens available for distribution, according to CoinMarketCap. The company’s spendable reserves climbed from 4.968 billion in January to 5.08 billion by March, and the April unlock extends that trend further.

The xrp price prediction gets stronger on institutional timelines, but even aggressive analyst targets place XRP at $3, roughly a 2x from $1.31, and the wallets that created real portfolios in crypto understand that a slow double over years is not where generational returns live.

Advertisement

XRP Price Prediction Builds a Long Term Case While Pepeto Delivers the Entry That Creates the Stories People Remember

Pepeto: The Entry Where Every Signal Points in the Same Direction at the Same Time

The xrp price prediction carries real weight and the escrow dynamics add serious context, but the wallets that turned crypto into generational wealth did not get there by watching large caps grind higher over years. They identified the moment where a proven team, working infrastructure, and presale pricing all existed simultaneously, and they committed before the listing repriced everything. Pepeto is that moment right now.

The cofounder who grew Pepe into an $11 billion success now leads an exchange where AI screens every contract for risk before it goes live, where tokens move freely between Ethereum, BNB Chain, and Solana at zero cost, and where trading fees simply do not exist.

A former Binance executive shapes the exchange architecture while SolidProof verified every contract before the first dollar entered. The xrp price prediction to $3 requires years of institutional settlement volume to materialize. Pepeto operates on its own clock because its exchange model generates demand from the first trade, and BNB proved what that model produces by climbing from its own presale to a $90 billion valuation purely on platform activity.

$8.68 million entered during a correction because the wallets behind it calculated what exchange volume does to a token priced at six zeros. This is the setup that produced BNB millionaires, that rewarded early DOGE holders, that every cycle delivers exactly once. Once Pepeto’s Binance listing goes live, this presale price vanishes and every multiple attached to it closes permanently.

Advertisement

XRP Price Prediction After Escrow Unlock: Constructive Long Term but Timeline Stretches Forward

XRP trades near $1.31 according to CoinMarketCap with the xrp price prediction targeting $1.47, $1.61, and $2.40 on technical completions. The CLARITY Act faces its binary Senate markup in late April.

The escrow unlock and RLUSD’s $1.3 billion market cap reinforce the long-term thesis, but analysts note that scaling requires the CLARITY Act to pass and institutional settlement to grow, placing the largest gains in the 2027 to 2030 window.

Conclusion

Ripple’s treasury strategy is legitimate and the xrp price prediction has earned its constructive case, but the wallets that captured the biggest returns in every cycle did not do it by holding large caps through slow climbs. They locked in the window where a proven founder, live infrastructure, and presale pricing all overlapped before the listing closed it permanently.

Pepeto is that alignment right now with a cofounder behind $11 billion, an exchange verified and approaching launch, and $8.68 million from wallets that studied the fundamentals and acted while fear kept others frozen.

Advertisement

Skipping Pepeto at presale stage most likely means buying after listing at whatever price the early wallets decide to sell at, and watching the returns every trader dreams about belong to someone else. Visit the Pepeto official website while the presale window remains open.

Click To Visit Pepeto Website To Enter The Presale

FAQs

How does Ripple’s April escrow unlock affect the xrp price prediction?

The April 1 unlock added 300M XRP to circulation, creating short-term supply pressure while long-term fundamentals remain constructive.

Advertisement

Is $3 a realistic xrp price prediction target for 2026?

XRP needs BTC past $100K and the CLARITY Act signed into law. Without both, it stays rangebound near $1.30 to $1.50.

Why are XRP investors also entering the Pepeto presale?

The xrp price prediction offers roughly 2x while Pepeto at presale pricing with a $7B cofounder and verified exchange offers multiples XRP cannot match.

Advertisement

Disclaimer: This is a Press Release provided by a third party who is responsible for the content. Please conduct your own research before taking any action based on the content.

Source link

Continue Reading

Crypto World

Japan Bond Market Crisis Raises Crypto Crash Fears as BOJ Rate Hike Looms

Published

on

Brian Armstrong's Bold Prediction: AI Agents Will Soon Dominate Global Financial

TLDR:

  • Japan’s 2Y, 3Y, 5Y bond yields hit all-time highs while the 10Y yield reached its highest since 1999.
  • The US-Iran conflict has blocked 90–95% of Japan’s oil route, driving inflation fears and BOJ pressure.
  • There is currently a 55% probability of a 25BPS BOJ rate hike this month, unsettling crypto markets.
  • Each BOJ rate hike since 2024 has caused Bitcoin to drop between 20% and 35% within weeks of the move.

Japan’s bond market crisis is drawing renewed attention from crypto investors worldwide. Bond yields across Japan’s 2-year, 3-year, and 5-year tenors have reached all-time highs.

The 10-year yield also climbed to its highest point since 1999. These shifts are raising concerns about a potential Bank of Japan rate hike. Analysts warn this could trigger a crypto market selloff similar to Q1 2026.

Rising Yields and the Strait of Hormuz Connection

Japan’s bond yields are climbing primarily because of growing inflation expectations. The ongoing US-Iran conflict has severely disrupted shipping through the Strait of Hormuz.

Nearly 90 to 95 percent of Japan’s oil supply passes through that route. With the strait largely blocked, energy prices for Japan are under significant upward pressure.

Higher energy costs feed directly into Japan’s broader inflation outlook. As a result, investors are pricing in the possibility of a hawkish shift from the Bank of Japan.

Advertisement

Crypto analyst Crypto Rover pointed to this connection on X. He noted that rising yields this week coincided with the shipping disruption.

When inflation expectations rise, bond yields typically follow. Japan is particularly vulnerable because of its heavy reliance on imported oil.

Advertisement

That dependence makes any disruption in Middle Eastern shipping a direct economic concern. Investors are now watching BOJ closely for any policy response.

Market data currently shows a 55 percent probability of a 25-basis-point rate hike by the BOJ this month. If the US-Iran situation remains unresolved, that probability is expected to climb further.

A confirmed rate hike could accelerate capital flows out of risk assets. Crypto markets would likely feel that pressure quickly.

BOJ Rate Hikes and Bitcoin’s Crash Pattern

Historical data shows a clear pattern between BOJ rate hikes and Bitcoin price drops. In March 2024, Bitcoin peaked near $74,000 and then fell roughly 20 percent.

Advertisement

In July 2024, it dropped 30 percent within a single week following a BOJ move. January 2025 saw Bitcoin fall 35 percent over several months after another hike.

The most recent example came in December 2025, when Bitcoin lost 34 percent in just six weeks. Crypto Rover attributed these drops to the unwinding of yen carry trades.

Traders who borrowed cheap yen are forced to sell assets when borrowing costs rise. That selling pressure then strengthens the yen and creates further liquidation.

The cycle tends to feed on itself once it starts. Asset prices fall, triggering more margin calls and further selling. Crypto markets, being highly liquid and volatile, often absorb the sharpest drops. Bitcoin and altcoins become exit routes for traders covering yen-denominated positions.

Advertisement

If the BOJ holds off on a hike, markets may stabilize in the near term. However, the bond market crisis in Japan remains an active risk for crypto investors globally.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Crypto World

Iran’s Telegram ban backfired, stoking crypto concerns

Published

on

Crypto Breaking News

The Iranian government’s bid to shutter Telegram in the country appears to have backfired, as millions of users find workarounds to stay online through privacy-centric tools and VPNs, according to Telegram founder Pavel Durov.

In a post on X, Durov said Tehran’s attempt to clamp down on the messaging app “years ago” has instead fueled a broader wave of circumvention. He noted that tens of millions of Iranians remain connected via VPNs and similar technologies, and he highlighted a cross-border effect as VPN-driven connectivity accelerates in Russia as well.

“The government hoped for mass adoption of its surveillance messaging apps, but got mass adoption of VPNs instead. Now, 50 million members of the digital resistance in Iran are joined by over 50 million more in Russia.”

Decentralized technologies—ranging from blockchain-based messaging to encrypted, distributed networks—are increasingly pitched as a way to counter state-imposed online restrictions and surveillance, offering users a path to private communications even when central authorities exert control.

Key takeaways

  • Iran’s Telegram ban did not end use; tens of millions continue to access the service via VPNs and related tools, per Pavel Durov.
  • The stance has produced a broader migration toward privacy-preserving and decentralized messaging technologies beyond a single app.
  • Even as governments restrict access, parallel connectivity channels such as Starlink and device-to-device mesh networks emerge as potential backstops for communication.
  • Evidence from protests in Nepal and Madagascar shows spikes in downloads of decentralized messaging apps during periods of social unrest, underscoring demand for censorship-resistant tools.
  • For investors and builders, the episode highlights a growing divergence between regulatory attempts to control information flow and a user base willing to adopt privacy-native infrastructure at scale.

Regulatory push, user resilience

Iran’s January 2026 nationwide internet blackout, enacted amid escalating protests and ongoing regional tensions, marked a decisive move to curb online mobilization. While the blackout remains in effect, residents retain some access through alternative means—most notably satellite-backed networks such as Starlink, which the government has not fully blocked—and through local, privacy-forward apps capable of wading through censorship filters.

Among the most discussed workarounds is BitChat, a messaging application built to operate over Bluetooth and mesh networks. BitChat turns each participating device into a relay node, effectively stitching a communications mesh that can bypass traditional networks and satellite backbones. Its decentralized design aims to keep conversations flowing even when centralized infrastructure is restricted.

Advertisement

The broader ecosystem around decentralized technologies is also expanding to address similar scenarios elsewhere. BitChat’s architecture has drawn attention for its potential to offer an alternative communication channel when internet access is compromised. The project’s technical approach and practical uses were detailed in public repositories and whitepapers, illustrating how mesh networking can complement or substitute conventional connectivity in crisis conditions.

Decentralized messaging in the crucible of unrest

The wave of protests that swept across Nepal in 2025 and 2026 brought a notable surge in interest for censorship-evading communication tools. Cointelegraph reported a sharp uptick in BitChat downloads in Nepal during the social-media crackdown, described as a period when the government’s grip on information intensified. In the same breath, Nepalese protests were described as having a transformative political effect within the month, with the government reportedly toppled by demonstrators in that period.

Similar dynamics were observed in Madagascar, where a related surge in decentralized messaging adoption accompanied political turbulence. These patterns illustrate a practical use case for privacy-preserving and distributed communications during periods of blackout and unrest, rather than a speculative tech experiment.

Proponents argue that the trend signals more than isolated incidents. As governments seek to regulate or disable centralized platforms, users appear to gravitate toward tools that improve resilience, privacy, and autonomy. This shift aligns with a broader discourse in the crypto and decentralized tech communities about building communications layers that remain accessible despite state-level interference.

Advertisement

What this means for markets, users, and builders

The episode offers a tangible case study in how regulatory pressure can inadvertently accelerate adoption of decentralized and privacy-first technologies. For traders and investors, the takeaway is not a call for quick price moves but a recognition that demand for censorship-resistant communications could expand alongside ongoing geopolitical frictions and regulatory crackdowns in various regions.

For developers and infrastructure builders, the narrative underscores several priorities: enhancing the reliability of offline and mesh-based communications, improving the security and usability of decentralized messaging, and developing interoperable layers that can bridge traditional networks with privacy-focused protocols. The convergence of encrypted messaging with crypto-inspired incentives and governance mechanisms could shape new kinds of platforms that prioritize user sovereignty and resilience over centralized control.

While the exact regulatory responses and technological adoption timelines remain uncertain, the Iranian case—paired with parallel developments in Nepal and Madagascar—highlights a clear, growing demand for alternatives that keep people connected when conventional networks falter.

As the situation evolves, watchers should monitor how governments respond to a populace that increasingly expects and deploys private, censorship-resistant channels. The next developments could redefine how citizens, developers, and policymakers think about online rights, access, and the role of decentralized technology in everyday communication.

Advertisement

Source references and ongoing reporting from Cointelegraph and related coverage underscore the continuity of this trend as it unfolds across regions facing varying degrees of internet control and regulatory pressure.

Risk & affiliate notice: Crypto assets are volatile and capital is at risk. This article may contain affiliate links. Read full disclosure

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Crypto World

Telegram Has Been Downloaded Over 50M Times in Iran, Despite Ban: Durov

Published

on

Decentralization, Privacy, Liberty, Telegram, Cypherpunks, Pavel Durov

The Iranian government’s attempt to block the Telegram messaging application in the country has backfired, as users find ways to circumvent national firewalls and online controls, according to Telegram co-founder Pavel Durov.

“Iran banned Telegram years ago,” Durov said on Friday; however, tens of millions of users in the country have managed to access the application via virtual private networks (VPNs) and other similar tools, he added.

VPNs route web traffic through servers distributed around the globe to mask the true Internet Protocol (IP) addresses of users and obscure their locations. This allows individuals with VPN access to bypass national online restrictions. Durov said:

“The government hoped for mass adoption of its surveillance messaging apps, but got mass adoption of VPNs instead. Now, 50 million members of the digital resistance in Iran are joined by over 50 million more in Russia.”

Decentralization, Privacy, Liberty, Telegram, Cypherpunks, Pavel Durov
Source: Pavel Durov

Decentralized technologies like blockchain, crypto and encrypted messaging applications can mitigate or neutralize state-imposed online restrictions and surveillance infrastructure, promoting individual liberty, proponents of decentralized technology say.

Related: Global turmoil pushes uptake of decentralized messengers, social media

Advertisement

Users turn to decentralized alternatives amid online blackouts

The government of Iran imposed a nationwide internet blackout in January 2026, amid growing protests and civil unrest, which is still in effect due to the ongoing war between Israel, the United States and Iran.

Residents in the country can still access the internet through Starlink, a satellite-based network, or communicate via BitChat, a messaging application that uses Bluetooth radio waves to form a mesh network between devices.

BitChat’s mesh network transforms each device into a relay node that transfers data to other devices running the application within range, bypassing online and satellite-based systems entirely.

Decentralization, Privacy, Liberty, Telegram, Cypherpunks, Pavel Durov
The components of the BitChat messaging application tech stack. Source: GitHub

The government of Nepal imposed a social media ban in September 2025 amid growing protests, causing a spike in BitChat downloads.

Bitchat was downloaded over 48,000 times in Nepal the week of the social media ban, and the government of Nepal was toppled by protestors that same month.

Advertisement

The application recorded a similar download spike in Madagascar amid protests, which also occurred around the same time as the political revolution in Nepal.

Magazine: Did Telegram’s Pavel Durov commit a crime? Crypto lawyers weigh in