Crypto World
Trump Names Kevin Warsh as Next Fed Chair
President Donald Trump on Friday nominated former Federal Reserve Governor Kevin Warsh to succeed Jerome Powell as chair of the central bank, setting up a high-stakes confirmation fight on Capitol Hill. The nomination, announced on Truth Social, followed months of speculation that Warsh—an ex‑Fed official and Morgan Stanley veteran—was the president’s preferred choice for the country’s top monetary policymaker. Trump said he had known Warsh for a long time and expressed conviction that he would become “one of the GREAT Fed chairmen, maybe the best.” Markets had already priced in a hawkish tilt, with prediction markets and Wall Street commentators increasingly tipping Warsh as the likely pick in the run-up to the disclosure.
Key takeaways
- Trump publicly endorses Kevin Warsh, a former Fed governor, as his preferred candidate to lead the Federal Reserve.
- Warsh’s tenure at the Fed (2006–2011) and his post‑crisis critiques of balance sheet expansion mark a clear shift from the status quo on policy direction.
- Warsh has signaled openness toward Bitcoin as a discipline-mechanism for markets, contrasting with Powell’s relatively cautious stance on crypto’s macro role.
- Markets are already pricing in a potential hawkish shift, with risk assets reacting as the nomination unfolds amid broader political uncertainties.
- Senate confirmation will examine Warsh’s past calls for tighter policy and his critiques of regulation and crisis interventions under Powell’s Fed.
Sentiment: Neutral
Price impact: Neutral. While some risk assets moved on the nomination news, there is no clear one-way price move attributable solely to the nomination at this stage.
Market context: The nomination arrives in a period of heightened scrutiny over the Fed’s policy posture and a fragile macro backdrop, with crypto markets already sensitive to regulatory signals, liquidity dynamics, and shifting risk sentiment.
Why it matters
The choice of a new Fed chair is inherently political, but it also has direct implications for the crypto economy. Kevin Warsh’s background—especially his criticism of post‑crisis balance sheet expansion and his calls for tighter policy—suggests a potential tilt toward greater policy restraint if confirmed.That possibility matters for traders who have long priced in slower or more accommodative monetary policy as a stabilizing force for asset markets, including digital assets that have historically moved in response to shifts in liquidity and inflation expectations. Warsh’s past stances indicate a willingness to scrutinize regulatory interventions and crisis-era programs that supporters say stabilized markets but that critics have argued fostered moral hazard. In a broader sense, the Fed chair’s tone can influence the pace of liquidity withdrawal, which in turn can affect risk assets and the digital-asset sector alike.
On crypto policy specifically, Warsh has been described as more constructive toward Bitcoin than Powell, a contrast that matters for capital allocation and the narrative around crypto’s place in the U.S. financial system. In a July discussion hosted by the Hoover Institution, Warsh rejected the notion that Bitcoin would curtail the Fed’s ability to conduct monetary policy, arguing instead that it could serve as a form of market discipline. The interview underscored a view that digital assets might be accommodated rather than sidelined as policymakers grapple with price stability and financial stability concerns. The nuance matters: appreciable openness to crypto within a Fed leadership team could influence regulatory punctuation marks—such as faster clarity on stablecoins, disclosures, and whether crypto markets receive more formalized oversight or dovish exemptions in exchange for transparency.
These considerations sit alongside broader market dynamics. As traders priced in the possibility of a hawkish administration of policy, Bitcoin and other assets traded with heightened sensitivity to headlines about the Fed, the debt limit, and the risk of a partial government shutdown. The tensions between safeguarding price stability and avoiding excessive financial stress continue to color how investors evaluate core inflation risks versus the risk that harsher monetary conditions could slow growth. In this environment, the Fed chair’s views on regulation, market structure, and crisis tools carry outsized significance for both traditional markets and the digital-asset space.
What to watch next
- Senate confirmation hearing: Track the date and agenda for Warsh’s confirmation vote, including questions on his stance toward monetary policy, regulation, and crisis-era interventions.
- Policy direction signals: Monitor whether Warsh’s public remarks hint at a tighter policy trajectory or a more cautious approach to balance-sheet normalization.
- Crypto regulatory posture: Expect scrutiny of Warsh’s comments on Bitcoin and other digital assets, and any early policy signals that could influence regulatory clarity for exchanges, stablecoins, and enforcement priorities.
- Market reaction: Observe whether equities, gold, and crypto display persistent moves tied to policy expectations, rather than purely episodic headlines.
Sources & verification
- Truth Social post announcing Warsh nomination: https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/posts/115983891481988557
- Cointelegraph report on Trump’s nomination and Warsh as favored candidate: https://cointelegraph.com/news/trump-tipped-to-name-kevin-warsh-next-fed-chair
- Independent coverage of Warsh’s Fed tenure and policy views: https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/kevin-warsh-federal-reserve-trump-powell-b2910734.html
- Hoover Institution July discussion featuring Warsh on Bitcoin: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qVFEcg-RIAk
- Cointelegraph analysis on Bitcoin sentiment and macro jitters amid policy debates: https://cointelegraph.com/news/bitcoin-investor-sentiment-cools-amid-us-shutdown-fears-fed-policy-jitters
Trump’s Fed chair pick reshapes policy expectations and crypto outlook
President Donald Trump’s nomination of Kevin Warsh to chair the Federal Reserve signals a deliberate reorientation in how the central bank might approach inflation, normalization, and crisis-era tools. Warsh’s path to the top job is notable for its blend of regulatory skepticism and market‑oriented pragmatism, a mix that could influence not only traditional markets but also how digital assets are treated in the policy landscape. The decision follows weeks of market chatter that placed Warsh at the top of Trump’s shortlist, a sentiment echoed in discussions across financial media and among traders watching the Fed’s balance sheet and inflation trajectory with heightened vigilance.
Warsh’s tenure on the Fed Board from 2006 to 2011 placed him squarely in the crucible of the financial crisis and the early postcrisis period. Since then, he has been among the more vocal critics of prolonged, ultra-loose monetary policy and the aggressive expansion of the central bank’s balance sheet. His public commentary has centered on calls for what some describe as a “regime change” at the Fed, arguing that more restrained policy could reduce the risk of excess risk-taking and moral hazard. The nomination thus represents not a mere leadership shift but a signal about the kind of monetary framework the administration envisions for the next several years.
In the crypto arena, Warsh’s posture toward digital assets stands in contrast to Powell’s measured, sometimes cautious approach to Bitcoin and other tokens. Warsh’s outspoken stance on Bitcoin as a possible market‑disciplining mechanism—rather than a destabilizing force—adds a nuanced layer to the ongoing policy debate. During a July Hoover Institution discussion, Warsh argued that Bitcoin could function as a form of market discipline and did not inherently undermine the Fed’s ability to steer the economy. That position diverges from the characterization that digital assets pose an existential risk to monetary independence, offering instead a framework in which crypto assets are integrated into broader financial stability considerations.
The political framing around Warsh’s nomination will be as important as the policy arguments. Senate confirmation will require rigorous scrutiny of Warsh’s past calls for tighter policy, his criticisms of the prior administration’s regulation approach, and his perspective on the crisis-era interventions that helped avert a broader collapse but also drew fire from critics who argued they created moral hazard. The debate could influence not only the timeline for any policy shifts but also the tone of discourse around the Fed’s independence and responsiveness to market developments, including the evolving role of crypto in mainstream finance.
Market participants are watching not just the decision itself but the guidance that may follow. The broader macro backdrop—drugging inflation expectations, potential debt-limit constraints, and ongoing regulatory conversations—creates a complex web of factors that could shape risk sentiment in crypto markets. As traders reassess the probability of a more aggressive stance on inflation or a tighter pace of balance-sheet normalization, Bitcoin and other digital assets will likely respond to a combination of policy messaging and macro indicators rather than to any single headline. In this context, Warsh’s appointment could serve as a catalyst for a broader recalibration of how fiat policy and crypto assets interact in the years ahead.
https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js
You can buy Pepeto in five simple steps: visit the official presale website at pepeto.io, set up a crypto wallet, deposit or buy crypto for payment, select the amount of PEPETO you want, and confirm the purchase. That is all it takes to get in before exchanges list this token and the presale price disappears.
This guide explains in full detail how to buy Pepeto before its presale ends, how the meme coin infrastructure platform works, and why analysts project 100x or more from the current price of $0.000000185.
Pepeto is only available through the official presale at pepeto.io. It is not listed on any exchange, DEX, or trading platform. Any token you see on Uniswap, PancakeSwap, or DEXTools using the Pepeto name is fake. The real PEPETO token does not exist on chain yet. It will only become tradable after the presale closes and the Token Generation Event takes place.
This is important because the presale has raised over $7.3 million and is more than 70% filled. Once it closes, the current price of $0.000000185 is gone permanently. The only safe place to buy Pepeto is pepeto.io.
How to buy Pepeto: step by step guide
Step 1: Set up a crypto wallet
Download MetaMask or Trust Wallet on your phone or browser. Create a new wallet and write down your recovery phrase on paper. Store it somewhere safe and never share it with anyone.
Step 2: Fund your wallet with ETH, USDT, or BNB
The Pepeto presale accepts ETH, USDT, and BNB. You can also pay with a credit card directly on the website. Send crypto from Coinbase or Binance to your wallet address. Keep a small amount for gas fees.
Step 3: Go to pepeto.io and connect your wallet
Visit pepeto.io and click “Connect Wallet.” Select your wallet provider and approve the connection. Always double check the URL before connecting.
Step 4: Choose your investment amount
Enter the amount you want to spend. The dashboard shows exactly how many PEPETO tokens you will receive. There is no minimum investment.
Step 5: Confirm and stake your tokens
Click “Buy” or “Buy and Stake” to start earning 212% APY immediately. Approve the transaction in your wallet. Tokens are claimable after the Token Generation Event.
What is Pepeto and why is it projected for 100x?
Pepeto is not just another meme coin. It is the first dedicated trading infrastructure platform built for the $45 billion meme coin economy. Three working demo products are live right now at pepeto.io. A cross chain swap lets traders move meme coins between networks. A blockchain bridge connects different chains. And a zero fee decentralized exchange saves money on every trade.
SolidProof and Coinsult both completed independent security audits. Zero percent tax on every buy and sell. The project traces back to an original Pepe Coin cofounder who watched $PEPE hit $7 billion with zero products and decided to build what the market was missing. A confirmed Binance listing is approaching.
At $0.000000185, a 100x needs just $50 million market cap. SHIB reached $40 billion with zero infrastructure. DOGE hit $90 billion on tweets alone. The math is simple. The window is now.
Is Pepeto safe to buy?
SolidProof and Coinsult both audited the smart contract with no critical issues found. Zero tax on every transaction. Standard Web3 wallet connections with no KYC required.
The bottom line on buying Pepeto
The Pepeto presale is simple to join. Connect a supported wallet and buy PEPETO with ETH, USDT, BNB, or credit card at $0.000000185. There is no minimum purchase. Staking currently offers 212% APY, which adds serious value on top of the projected 100x from presale to exchange listing. Over $7.3 million raised and 70% filled. Once the presale closes, this price is gone forever.
Click To Visit Official Website To Buy Pepeto
FAQs
How to buy Pepeto in 2026?
Visit pepeto.io, connect MetaMask or Trust Wallet, fund with ETH, USDT, BNB, or credit card, select the amount, and confirm. Pepeto is only available through the official presale website.
Where can I buy Pepeto tokens?
Pepeto can only be purchased at pepeto.io during the presale. It is not on any exchange. Any PEPETO token appearing on exchanges or DEXs is fake and not connected to the real project.
Is Pepeto a good investment in 2026?
At $0.000000185 with three working demos, dual audits, 212% APY staking, and a confirmed Binance listing ahead, Pepeto offers 100x math to just $50 million market cap. The presale is 70% filled.
Disclaimer: This is a Press Release provided by a third party who is responsible for the content. Please conduct your own research before taking any action based on the content.
The well-followed Coinbase Bitcoin Premium Index briefly looked like it was recovering after the Feb. 5 crash. It wasn’t.
The premium has now been negative for 40 consecutive days, according to Coinglass data, setting the longest streak of sub-zero readings since 2023. The current reading sits at -0.0467%, barely changed from two weeks ago, when a sharp narrowing from -0.22% suggested U.S. buyers had stepped in near the lows.
The index measures the price gap between bitcoin on Coinbase and the global market average. Coinbase is widely used as a proxy for U.S. institutional and dollar-denominated flows, so a persistent negative reading means American investors are consistently paying less than the rest of the world — either selling more aggressively or simply not showing up.
The previous record was roughly 30 days of continuous negative premium during the October 2025 drawdown. That streak broke when a sharp bounce brought U.S. buyers back into the market. This time, the bounce came, as bitcoin recovered as much as 15% from its Feb. 5 intraday low. But the premium never followed.
That divergence shows that while price recovered, the composition of demand didn’t. Whatever buying drove bitcoin back above $62,000 came from outside U.S. hours, outside Coinbase’s order books, or both.
The one constructive read is that the premium has been gradually less negative since early February, creeping from -0.22% back toward -0.05%. It’s improving, just not fast enough to flip positive, a threshold that historically coincides with sustained accumulation phases rather than relief rallies.
Interestingly, Google searches for “bitcoin zero” in the U.S. hit record highs earlier this month, as CoinDesk reported, even as global search interest for the term remained flat.
Both signals point to American investors specifically losing conviction at a pace that hasn’t shown up elsewhere.
Days after JPMorgan Chase & Co. admitted to debanking President Donald Trump after the Jan. 6, 2021 attack on the Capitol, the Federal Reserve seeks comments on its proposal that would stop government supervisors from pushing banks to sever ties with lawful customers based on their activities, including crypto companies.
“We have heard troubling cases of debanking — where supervisors use concerns about reputation risk to pressure financial institutions to debank customers because of their political views, religious beliefs or involvement in disfavored but lawful businesses,” including cryptocurrency, said Vice Chair for Supervision Michelle W. Bowman.
“Discrimination by financial institutions on these bases is unlawful and does not have a role in the Federal Reserve’s supervisory framework,” she added.
The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, in its capacity as the supervisor of national banks, had already moved to cut reputational factors from its supervision last year, and the Federal Reserve had similarly announced in July that such risk would no longer be a part of its bank examinations, so this rule process would codify that move.
Crypto debanking has been well documented and freely acknowledged by banking regulators appointed by Trump, though new examples continue to emerge. In a response to a lawsuit filed last month by Trump and the Trump Organization, JPMorgan, the nation’s largest bank, said for the first time that it cut off more than 50 Trump accounts in February 2021. JPMorgan did not specify a reason for closing the accounts. On Nov. 23, 2025, Jack Mallers, CEO of crypto payments company Strike, wrote a social media post that immediately went viral, saying JPMorgan closed all his accounts without cause.
In a Jan. 26 memo to the Board of Governors, the Fed’s staff wrote that the board’s proposal would “codify the removal of reputation risk from the Board’s supervisory programs” and prohibit the Fed from “encouraging or compelling” banks to deny or condition services to customers involved in “politically disfavored but lawful business activities.”
In the proposal, the Fed Board said it intends to include “permitted payment stablecoin issuers” within its definition of covered banking organizations after completing separate rulemakings, a move that could directly affect crypto-native firms seeking access to the banking system.
The Fed said comments on its proposal to remove reputation risk from its supervision of banks are due in 60 days from Feb. 23.
Ether (ETH) whale activity on a major exchange has slowed since the start of 2026, with roughly 2 million ETH traded in large-sized transactions over the past 45 days.
ETH is currently in the midst of its worst weekly losing streak since 2022, with exchange flow trends and futures market liquidation data impacting investor expectations for Ether’s short and long-term price direction in the broader market.
Ether whale order size hints at fading participation
CryptoQuant data shows that the average ETH whale sell orders on Binance have fallen to around 1,350 ETH in recent weeks, down from roughly 2,250 ETH in early January. Assuming 15 to 35 whale-sized executions per day, the cumulative gross sell-side turnover since Jan. 8 is estimated at around 1.8 to 2 million ETH over the past 45 days.
Using an average price of $2,400, this activity equates to roughly $4.3 billion to $4.8 billion in large-order executions. The figure reflects gross traded volume, not confirmed net outflows, as part of the flows may relate to hedging or liquidity provision within the derivatives market.
Crypto analyst Darkfost said the decline in the average order size points to a “gradual disengagement” from larger participants. According to the analyst, smaller traders continue to transact at stable volumes, while bigger players are reducing direct interaction with the order books.
This shift indicates a temporary thinning of market depth. With fewer large resting orders, ETH’s capacity to absorb sharp price imbalances narrows in the short term.
Parallel to exchange flows, ETH accumulation addresses added more than 2.5 million ETH in February as the price fell about 20%. Total holdings climbed to 26.7 million ETH from 22 million at the start of 2026, signaling steady demand beneath the surface.
Related: Ethereum price drops to $1.8K as data suggests ETH bears are not done yet
Will Ether break its longest bearish streak since 2022?
Ether is now in its sixth straight week of losses, marking the longest uninterrupted weekly decline since the 10-week drawdown between March 2022 and June 2022. That earlier stretch unfolded during a broader bear market and led to a cycle bottom before price stabilized.
While the current pullback is not as long, the streak highlights sustained selling pressure and weakening momentum on the higher timeframe.
Historical market cycle data suggests that if the decline continues, a broad weekly demand zone between $1,384 and $1,691 may come into focus, an area that previously acted as accumulation during the early stages of the rally in 2023.
Futures market liquidation data shows more than $2 billion in short positions clustered around $2,000. This creates a dense liquidity pocket that may act as the near-term magnet for Ether price.
On the downside, approximately $682 million in long positions remain at risk if Ether drops to $1,600, indicating thinner liquidity compared to the upside cluster.
Crypto trader RickUntZ said he still sees potential for a V-shaped rebound from current levels, citing signs of underlying demand in the current structure. For now, data suggests that the $2,000 liquidation band remains the next key resistance to break.
Related: Ethereum Foundation starts staking ETH as client diversity concerns persist
This article does not contain investment advice or recommendations. Every investment and trading move involves risk, and readers should conduct their own research when making a decision. While we strive to provide accurate and timely information, Cointelegraph does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of any information in this article. This article may contain forward-looking statements that are subject to risks and uncertainties. Cointelegraph will not be liable for any loss or damage arising from your reliance on this information.
Crypto World
Millions in crypto funded tools to exploit U.S. software, Treasury says in new sanctions
The U.S. Treasury Department has sanctioned a Russian company, Operation Zero, and the individuals behind it after accusing them of buying stolen cyber tools for millions in cryptocurrency and re-selling those technologies, which were created to be used by the U.S. government.
The tools bought and sold by newly sanctioned Sergey Sergeyevich Zelenyuk and his business, Operation Zero, were said to be originally stolen by an Australian national, Peter Williams, who once worked at the defense contractor that made the national-security focused software “for the exclusive use of the U.S. government and select allies.” Williams pleaded guilty last year to selling trade secrets.
“Treasury will continue to work alongside the rest of the Trump Administration to protect sensitive American intellectual property and safeguard our national security,” said Secretary of the Treasury Scott Bessent in a statement.
Zelenyuk and the others are said to be the first people to be sanctioned under the Protecting American Intellectual Property Act. The sanctions by the Office of Foreign Assets Control block U.S. people from any business dealings with those flagged or with others who do business with them.”Operation Zero has sought to recruit hackers to support its activities and develop business relationships with foreign intelligence agencies through use of social media,” the Treasury Department said in its statement. The accusations say the tools were offered for sale to those seeking to exploit vulnerabilities in computer software.
While the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Asset Control alleged that cryptocurrencies were used in the transactions, it did not list specific addresses for blacklisting.
Read More: Criminal use of crypto spikes after years of steady decline, TRM report says
A veteran bull said that the Bitcoin Core team is “fighting the last war.”
The blockchain’s quantum conundrum is intensifying, raising fresh concerns about whether Bitcoin can survive the long-term threat posed by quantum computing.
A veteran bull has warned that it poses Bitcoin’s first truly existential risk, but is being ignored.
“Fighting the Last War”
Charles Edwards, founder of Capriole Investments, said he is more concerned about Bitcoin’s future today than at any point across multiple market cycles, while citing the growing threat posed by quantum computing.
In a post on X, Edwards explained that he had previously remained confident through extreme price crashes, exchange shutdowns, hacks, and major frauds such as the collapse of FTX. He said those events never undermined his long-term outlook on Bitcoin.
However, the current risk is different in nature, according to Edwards, who warned that Bitcoin’s existing cryptographic defenses are not adequate to withstand advances in quantum technology. He compared the situation to outdated military strategies being deployed against modern warfare, and stated that Bitcoin “does not stand a chance” without adaptation.
The investor also added that the most troubling aspect is not only the severity of the quantum threat itself, but what he described as the dismissal and lack of urgency surrounding the issue.
CryptoQuant founder Ki Young Ju had also voiced concerns about the growing quantum computing threat facing Bitcoin. He said that protecting the network may require difficult decisions. One potential solution, according to Ju, could be freezing older Bitcoin addresses as part of a quantum-resistant upgrade.
You may also like:
He added that implementing such changes would be challenging, as the crypto community has often struggled to agree on protocol updates. Ju even went on to add that assets considered secure today may not remain safe if quantum technology continues to advance.
Industry Remains Divided
Not everyone in the crypto industry agrees on how urgent the threat to the world’s largest cryptocurrency really is. In December, Jameson Lopp, co-founder and chief security officer of Casa, said quantum computers do not pose a near-term risk to Bitcoin. He believes the technology remains far from being able to break Bitcoin’s cryptography. Lopp acknowledged that researchers should continue monitoring progress in the field, but said fears of an imminent threat are premature. He also noted that preparing Bitcoin for a post-quantum future would be a long process.
Similar views have been expressed by Grayscale, which said in a recent report that quantum computing is unlikely to have a meaningful impact on crypto markets in 2026. While acknowledging long-term risks, the firm downplayed short-term consequences.
More recently, Strategy co-founder Michael Saylor also minimized the concern. Speaking on Coin Stories with Natalie Brunell, Saylor said most cybersecurity experts believe any credible quantum threat remains more than a decade away.
Binance Free $600 (CryptoPotato Exclusive): Use this link to register a new account and receive $600 exclusive welcome offer on Binance (full details).
LIMITED OFFER for CryptoPotato readers at Bybit: Use this link to register and open a $500 FREE position on any coin!
Solana price has formed a swing failure pattern at the 0.618 Fibonacci support, signaling potential demand and raising the probability of a short-term reversal.
Summary
- Swing failure pattern formed at key 0.618 Fibonacci support
- $78 resistance reclaim needed to confirm reversal structure
- Upside target toward $88 if bullish momentum strengthens
Solana (SOL) price action is displaying a technically significant development as a swing failure pattern (SFP) forms at a key Fibonacci support level. After an extended corrective move, Solana briefly broke below its previous swing low, only to quickly reclaim it, leaving multiple downside wicks on the chart. This type of price behavior often signals liquidity absorption and the presence of underlying demand.
The SFP has emerged at the 0.618 Fibonacci retracement level, a historically important support area that traders closely monitor during pullbacks. When liquidity is swept below prior lows and price immediately recovers, it frequently indicates that sellers are losing momentum and buyers are stepping in at discounted levels.
While confirmation is still required, the current setup raises the question of whether Solana is forming a local bottom within its broader trading structure.
Solana price key technical points
- Swing failure pattern confirmed: Previous low swept with strong rejection
- 0.618 Fibonacci support respected: Key retracement level attracting demand
- $78 resistance pivotal: Reclaim could trigger acceleration toward $88
The defining feature of this setup is the swing failure pattern itself. An SFP occurs when price breaks below a prior swing low, triggers stop-loss liquidity, and then quickly reverses back above that level. This behavior traps aggressive sellers and often fuels short-term upward momentum.
In Solana’s case, multiple wicks below the previous low demonstrate that price attempted to trade lower but failed to find acceptance. Instead, buyers absorbed the selling pressure and pushed price back into prior structure.
These types of technical reactions are especially meaningful when they occur at major Fibonacci levels, even as broader ecosystem developments, including Step Finance shutting down its Solana-based platforms after a January hack that reportedly drained up to $40 million, continue to influence market sentiment.
The 0.618 retracement is widely regarded as one of the most important levels in technical analysis. Markets frequently react strongly here, as it represents a deep corrective zone within a broader trend. Solana’s ability to defend this level strengthens the argument that a bounce may already be underway.
Market structure shifts toward reversal potential
From a market structure perspective, early signs of reversal are beginning to form. The SFP suggests that downside momentum may be fading, but confirmation requires a shift in local resistance levels.
The key level to monitor now is $78. This region represents local resistance and an important decision point. For Solana to transition from corrective bounce to confirmed reversal, price must reclaim and hold above $78. Acceptance above this level would signal structural improvement and invalidate the immediate bearish bias.
Reclaiming $78 would also position Solana back above the value area low, an important benchmark in volume-based analysis. When price regains this level, it often reflects improving sentiment and increasing participation from buyers, particularly as ecosystem developments continue to evolve, including Zora expanding onto the Solana blockchain with its new “attention markets” product beyond its earlier NFT and Ethereum focus.
$88 emerges as next upside objective
If Solana successfully reclaims $78, the probability increases for an accelerated move toward the next high-timeframe resistance at $88. This level aligns with prior distribution zones and serves as a natural liquidity target following a confirmed SFP.
The move toward $88 would represent not only a relief rally but also a meaningful structural recovery within the broader market context. A break above this level would further reinforce the bullish thesis and potentially shift the medium-term outlook.
However, failure to reclaim $78 would weaken the setup. In that scenario, the SFP may represent only a temporary reaction rather than the start of sustained upside continuation.
What to expect in the coming price action
From a technical, price action, and market structure perspective, Solana is at a critical inflection point. The swing failure pattern at the 0.618 Fibonacci support suggests a potential local bottom may be forming. Confirmation now hinges on a decisive reclaim of the $78 resistance level. If achieved, Solana could accelerate toward $88 and reclaim higher value zones in the short term.
Until then, the market remains in a reaction phase, with traders closely watching resistance for validation of a broader reversal.
Crypto World
58% of Ethereum’s wealth is hiding in plain sight, and half of DeFi is built on thin air
Disclosure: This article does not represent investment advice. The content and materials featured on this page are for educational purposes only.
Ethereum’s top holders double in size when tokens and stablecoins are included in on-chain valuations.
Summary
- Aggregating ETH with tokens shows top holders control $426 billion, over 2x higher than ETH-only rankings reveal.
- Including ERC-20s shifts power view, with smart contracts holding nearly 40% of top Ethereum balances.
- New PPI metric flags self-minted DeFi exposure, warning of fragility if selling pressure triggers unwind risks.
Ethereum’s balance sheet looks nothing like what it looked like a couple of years ago.
A new on-chain analysis has found that 58% of capital held by Ethereum’s largest addresses exists outside of Ethereum (ETH) entirely — sitting in ERC-20 tokens and stablecoins that traditional rankings simply don’t capture.
When Ethereum addresses are ranked by ETH balance alone, the top 10,000 hold a combined $189 billion. Rank those same addresses by total assets — ETH plus ERC-20 tokens and stablecoins — and that figure climbs to $426 billion. The capital sitting at the top of Ethereum’s economy is more than twice as large as conventional rankings suggest.
The gap is not just a numbers story. It reveals an entirely different cast of major holders. Among the top 1,000 addresses, only 537 appear in both the ETH-only and the aggregated rankings, meaning nearly half of Ethereum’s largest holders are effectively invisible when the market looks at ETH balances alone.
The composition of those holdings tells its own story. ETH now represents just 42% of what the largest addresses hold. Stablecoins account for roughly 26%, with the remaining share spread across ERC-20 tokens. A form of dominance shift has already taken place through quiet balance-sheet accumulation across protocols and tokens while prices remained largely range-bound.
Smart contracts are a central part of this new picture. Through an ETH-only lens, they appeared as minor participants in Ethereum’s wealth distribution. In the aggregated ranking, they control nearly 40% of top-holder capital. This roughly three times their previous share. Risk, the report argues, has migrated from individual holders making decisions to automated mechanisms governed by code, collateral design and token economics.
That shift in who holds capital leads directly to a harder question: what is that capital actually made of?
To answer it, the report introduces the Printing-Press Index, which is a measure of how much of a protocol’s token holdings are made up of its own self-issued tokens. Among DeFi protocols, that figure clusters around 50%, with names like Uniswap, Aave and Mantle among the examples cited.
The report identifies roughly 20% as the point where self-issued tokens begin to introduce meaningful risk, and 40-50% as the threshold where a protocol enters fragile territory. At those levels, a balance sheet is no longer primarily backed by external capital — it is partially backed by confidence in itself.
Modest selling pressure can impair that confidence, compress liquidity, and trigger the kind of reflexive unwind seen in the LUNA-UST collapse, where a Printing-Press Index near 100% contributed to a full death spiral within days.
The implication for how Ethereum’s economy is analyzed is significant. Once tokens represent the majority of large-address holdings and smart contracts control nearly 40% of that capital, balance size alone becomes a poor indicator of resilience. The Printing-Press Index offers a practical way to look past headline figures and assess what is actually backing the wealth that aggregated rankings are now beginning to reveal.
Disclosure: This content is provided by a third party. Neither crypto.news nor the author of this article endorses any product mentioned on this page. Users should conduct their own research before taking any action related to the company.
- Bitcoin Cash price dropped more than 10% as bears hit the crypto market on Tuesday.
- The altcoin fell to lows of $481 and risked further losses amid Bitcoin weakness.
- Analysts say demand recovery could help bulls bounce.
Bitcoin Cash price has extended its downward trajectory, shedding more than 10% in value over the past 24 hours to touch lows of $481 in early trading on February 24, 2025.
The declines come as bearish sentiment grips the broader cryptocurrency market, with top coins plunging alongside Bitcoin’s fall below $63,000.
While some analysts note that the market could see a potential for a short-term recovery, prevailing headwinds favour sellers.
Other altcoins, including Ethereum, XRP, and BNB, have also marked steep declines as negative sentiment dominates.
BCH drops amid macro and geopolitical headwinds
Fresh tariff threats from US President Donald Trump, following a recent Supreme Court ruling on Trump’s 2025 tariffs, have triggered risk-off sentiment.
This has been compounded by other factors, including geopolitical uncertainty, which has prompted investors to seek safer assets and steer clear of volatile cryptocurrencies.
Weak sentiment has, in turn, suppressed crypto bids and contributed to huge outflows from digital asset investment products.
Tightening liquidity and elevated liquidations have further weighed on risk appetite, capping Bitcoin’s rebound.
The dump to lows of $62,700 for BTC accelerated losses for Bitcoin Cash amid this outlook, with bears showing greater appetite as daily volume jumped 46% to over $545 million.
Analysts say the macroeconomic picture and potential escalation in US-Iran tensions could cue further losses.
However, resolutions in favour of bulls will help cut the impact of the correction.
Bitcoin Cash price analysis
As noted, Bitcoin Cash traded as low as $481 on February 24, slipping by double digits in 24 hours as sellers pulled prices from highs of $570.
The fresh selling that has driven BCH below $500 aligns with technical indicators that paint a mostly bearish picture.
Bitcoin Cash’s recent declines have pushed the 50-day moving average toward the 200-day moving average, outlining a possible death cross pattern.
Increased losses and confirmation will come with intensified bearish momentum.
Meanwhile, the RSI and MACD indicators are also slipping lower, signaling bearish control.
According to CryptoQuant, Bitcoin’s slide from near $68k to under $63k coincides with the Coinbase Premium Index (SMA 30) rejecting downward.
The index gauges price premium on Coinbase versus global exchanges, and its downtrend for over a month suggests US selling pressure remains.
Failure to recover in the latest sessions highlights continued institutional hesitation.
Analysts at Bitfinex also share a similar outlook.
$BTC can bounce on positioning, but it rallies on spot demand.
CVD implies roughly $2.5B of net market sells since Feb 20 across centralised exchanges. That is not “one bad actor”, it is broad distribution.
Until that slows, breakouts often fade. pic.twitter.com/sR3vfvaZVi
— Bitfinex (@bitfinex) February 24, 2026
If Bitcoin drops to $50k or lower, a cascade of sell-off pressure will exacerbate BCH’s losses.
In the short term, BCH faces continued selling toward $425 and possibly $378.
On the upside, initial resistance is at the $500 mark, and then the moving average levels.
Currently, the 50-day and 200-day MA are converging near $560-$566.
A major shareholder in Empery Digital has urged the company to abandon its Bitcoin-focused strategy, sell its digital asset holdings, and return the proceeds to investors, while calling for the resignation of the CEO and the entire board. In a letter dated February 23, 2026, Tice P. Brown, who owns about 9.8% of Empery Digital’s outstanding shares, argued that management has insulated itself at holders’ expense and pushed for a governance reset to unlock shareholder value. Brown’s appeal arrives as the company faces questions about whether its Bitcoin-centric approach remains viable amid a tighter funding environment and shifting volatility in crypto markets.
Brown’s leverage escalated just days after he disclosed that Empery Digital privately approached him on February 18 with an offer to repurchase all of his shares at a price equal to 100% of their market net asset value (mNAV), a premium he described as sizable relative to prevailing valuations. He rejected the proposal, saying it appeared designed to preserve management’s positions rather than to return capital to shareholders. The disclosure underscores a broader tension between insiders who favor propping up the company’s strategy and dissident investors seeking a more liquid, investor-friendly outcome.
Brown has been vocally critical of Empery Digital’s capital allocation decisions, governance posture, and its buyback strategy, arguing for a pivot away from a Bitcoin-centric model. In his view, the company should reposition toward liquidity, diversification, and a clearer path to capital returns for holders. Empery Digital has publicly pushed back, asserting that Brown’s characterization of events is distorted and that management remains open to arrangements that align with the long-term interests of the company and its shareholders.
The tensions come as Empery Digital, formerly known as Volcon, restructures its identity around a Bitcoin-focused corporate treasury. The company began its pivot in mid-2025 with the aim of becoming a Bitcoin aggregator, amassing a sizable position in the cryptocurrency. As of the latest disclosures, Empery Digital holds 4,081 BTC, placing it among the top 25 publicly traded Bitcoin holders globally. That concentration has become a focal point for critics who question whether a treasury strategy anchored to a volatile asset class can sustain long-term shareholder value, especially when market conditions compress valuations across the sector.
Analysts and observers have noted that digital asset treasuries have faced renewed pressure as crypto prices retrace and equity valuations across the sector compress. Standard Chartered recently warned that the sustainability of many crypto-treasury models depends on maintaining a premium valuation relative to the underlying Bitcoin holdings, a premium that has proved increasingly difficult to defend in current markets. The dynamic raises questions about whether Empery Digital’s current structure can weather declines in Bitcoin’s price, while still delivering meaningful upside to investors if market sentiment improves.
Meanwhile, the market context for crypto treasuries remains nuanced. On one hand, Bitcoin remains a focal point for investors seeking on-chain exposure within corporate balance sheets. On the other, the performance and governance of firms with large digital-asset holdings are scrutinized more closely, given concerns about liquidity, transparency, and the ability to liquidate assets without triggering adverse price moves. The public discourse around Empery Digital’s strategy reflects a broader debate about the role of crypto-treasury functions within traditional corporate structures and the potential need for governance safeguards to protect minority holders during periods of volatility.
Empery Digital’s Bitcoin gambit could be upended
The dispute highlights growing tensions around Empery Digital’s business model, which now centers on holding Bitcoin as its principal asset rather than pursuing a diversified corporate portfolio. The company’s strategic direction—pursuing a Bitcoin-centered treasury that aspires to function as a Bitcoin aggregator—has drawn both curiosity and criticism. If Brown’s push gains traction and the board yields to investor demands, a liquidation or partial divestment of the BTC holding could dramatically reframe the company’s value proposition and alter investor expectations about future returns.
Empery Digital’s origin story adds another layer to the narrative. It began life as Volcon, a maker of electric off-road vehicles and related equipment, before pivoting to a crypto-centric treasury strategy in 2025. The shift represents a broader trend in which corporate treasuries allocate to digital assets as a hedge or growth engine, a move that has attracted both interest and regulatory scrutiny. The transformation also places Empery Digital at the center of conversations about governance, capital allocation, and the sustainability of asset-backed valuations in the crypto era.
Brown’s stance, backed by his 9.8% stake, has already prompted public statements from Empery Digital. The company contends that Brown “continues to misrepresent and distort the facts,” arguing that any repurchase discussions were solely driven by a desire to act in the best interests of all shareholders. The public exchange signals a potential turning point for Empery Digital, as management seeks to defend a strategy that has become highly scrutinized in a market where liquidity and asset valuations can swing rapidly. This back-and-forth underscores the challenges faced by crypto-treasury businesses when governance decisions intersect with market cycles and investor sentiment.
Beyond Empery Digital’s shores, the broader crypto market has watched closely. Bitcoin’s price dynamics have influenced how investors evaluate crypto treasuries, with some market participants arguing that pure BTC accumulation strategies may need to be complemented by liquidity options, hedging mechanisms, or revenue-generating activities to weather downturns. As the sector collectively reassesses the economics of digital-asset holdings in corporate portfolios, Empery Digital’s situation could serve as a barometer for how governance disputes, minority shareholder rights, and strategic pivots are resolved in real time.
The discord also touches on the question of whether a company can sustain a premium to its net asset value (NAV) when its core asset—the cryptocurrency—suffers price fluctuations. If the market reassesses the premium to NAV or doubts the ability to liquidate Bitcoin holdings efficiently without impacting prices, investors may demand more transparent pathways to value realization. In that context, Empery Digital’s leadership transition discussions and potential strategic recalibration become critical signals for the market around risk, governance, and the alignment of incentives between management and shareholders.
As the story unfolds, market observers will be watching for three key developments: the board’s response to Brown’s letter and any concrete governance changes, the outcome of any discussions about liquidating or reallocating the BTC holdings, and how Empery Digital communicates its strategic considerations to investors going forward. The stakes extend beyond a single shareholder dispute; they touch on how crypto-treasury strategies are evaluated, priced, and regulated within traditional capital markets. The unfolding narrative will likely influence how other publicly traded entities with cryptocurrency holdings approach governance, disclosures, and capital-allocation decisions in an environment characterized by ongoing scrutiny and evolving market dynamics.
What to watch next
- Public response from Empery Digital’s board and any formal governance votes or resolutions related to Brown’s requests.
- Updates on the company’s BTC holdings, including any implications for liquidity, NAV, and potential sale or diversification plans.
- forthcoming statements or filings detailing the timeline of any share repurchase discussions or revised capital-allocation strategies.
- Market reaction to governance developments and any subsequent price or volatility shifts in the company’s shares or BTC exposure.
Sources & verification
- Shareholder letter from Tice P. Brown to Empery Digital’s board (Feb 23, 2026) as published in GlobeNewswire.
- Empery Digital’s statement addressing Brown’s characterization (as referenced in FT Markets reporting on Feb 24, 2026).
- StreetInsider coverage of the shareholder push for CEO and board resignations.
- BitcoinTreasuries.NET page documenting Empery Digital’s BTC holdings (Volcon Inc) and its ranking among public holders.
Empery Digital’s Bitcoin strategy under pressure as investor calls for governance shakeup
Empery Digital has built a Bitcoin (CRYPTO: BTC)-centric treasury, accumulating 4,081 BTC to date and positioning itself among the world’s more prominent public holders. The approach, intended to create value through crypto asset appreciation, has become a focal point for governance scrutiny after a major shareholder demanded a major strategic pivot. The confrontation began with a February 23 letter from Tice P. Brown, who holds roughly 9.8% of the company’s outstanding shares, urging the removal of CEO Ryan Lane and the entire board, and calling for a sale of the company’s Bitcoin stash with proceeds redistributed to shareholders. Brown contends that the current management team has entrenched itself in a way that undermines shareholder interests and capital efficiency.
The letter revealed a concrete counterproposal: a prior private offer to repurchase Brown’s shares at 100% of market net asset value (mNAV), framed as a premium to current market valuations. Brown rejected the deal, arguing that such a transaction would simply preserve existing control structures rather than deliver meaningful capital returns to investors. The exchange underscores a broader debate about whether a Bitcoin-centered strategy can deliver durable value in a market characterized by price swings, regulatory shifts, and evolving liquidity dynamics. While Brown framed the buyback as an opportunity to unlock value, Empery Digital characterizes the proposal as misaligned with the company’s long-term interests and governance standards.
Empery Digital’s response emphasizes that its leadership sought to engage Brown in a manner consistent with shareholder value creation, while maintaining a careful stance on the timing and method of any liquidity actions. The company’s board contends that Brown’s public portrayal of events does not accurately reflect the negotiation process, and insists that discussions were conducted with the aim of safeguarding the equity base. This exchange highlights the delicate balance between a treasury strategy anchored in a volatile asset and the expectations of public investors who seek predictable returns and governance accountability.
Looking ahead, the market will assess whether Empery Digital’s Bitcoin holdings—built over the course of 2025 and sustained into 2026—can withstand a shifting macro backdrop. Standard Chartered’s warnings about the sustainability of a premium to NAV in crypto-treasuries add a layer of caution to the conversation. If the market shifts away from valuing Bitcoin-heavy treasuries at a premium, companies like Empery Digital may need to demonstrate enhanced liquidity options, transparent capital-allocation policies, and credible pathways to returning capital to shareholders. The ongoing debate is not merely about whether to hold or sell; it is about how a crypto-native strategy integrates with corporate governance norms, investor expectations, and the regulatory environment that shapes disclosures and financial performance.
In the near term, investors will look for clarity on governance and strategy. Brown’s letter has already sparked a public debate about whether a Bitcoin-focused corporate treasury can deliver consistent shareholder value without sacrificing governance and liquidity. Empery Digital’s next moves—whether they entail partial divestitures, strategic diversification, or a recalibration of its capital-allocation framework—will be closely watched by a spectrum of investors, from crypto-focused funds to traditional equity holders seeking risk-adjusted exposure to digital assets. The outcome could influence how other companies with crypto holdings articulate their governance structures and communicate with shareholders in a market that remains sensitive to both asset volatility and governance signals.
Savannah Guthrie Raises Reward for Nancy to $1 Million Amid Search
How it Happened – The 2008 Financial Crisis: Crash Course Economics #12
our financial model can better illustrate long-term value
-
Video5 days agoXRP News: XRP Just Entered a New Phase (Almost Nobody Noticed)
-
Fashion4 days agoWeekend Open Thread: Boden – Corporette.com
-
Politics3 days agoBaftas 2026: Awards Nominations, Presenters And Performers
-
Sports1 day agoWomen’s college basketball rankings: Iowa reenters top 10, Auriemma makes history
-
Business7 days agoInfosys Limited (INFY) Discusses Tech Transitions and the Unique Aspects of the AI Era Transcript
-
Entertainment6 days agoKunal Nayyar’s Secret Acts Of Kindness Sparks Online Discussion
-
Politics1 day agoNick Reiner Enters Plea In Deaths Of Parents Rob And Michele
-
Tech6 days agoRetro Rover: LT6502 Laptop Packs 8-Bit Power On The Go
-
Sports6 days agoClearing the boundary, crossing into history: J&K end 67-year wait, enter maiden Ranji Trophy final | Cricket News
-
Business2 days agoMattel’s American Girl brand turns 40, dolls enter a new era
-
Crypto World13 hours agoXRP price enters “dead zone” as Binance leverage hits lows
-
Business2 days agoLaw enforcement kills armed man seeking to enter Trump’s Mar-a-Lago resort, officials say
-
Entertainment6 days agoDolores Catania Blasts Rob Rausch For Turning On ‘Housewives’ On ‘Traitors’
-
Business7 days agoTesla avoids California suspension after ending ‘autopilot’ marketing
-
Tech2 days agoAnthropic-Backed Group Enters NY-12 AI PAC Fight
-
NewsBeat1 day ago‘Hourly’ method from gastroenterologist ‘helps reduce air travel bloating’
-
NewsBeat2 days agoArmed man killed after entering secure perimeter of Mar-a-Lago, Secret Service says
-
Politics2 days agoMaine has a long track record of electing moderates. Enter Graham Platner.
-
Crypto World6 days agoWLFI Crypto Surges Toward $0.12 as Whale Buys $2.75M Before Trump-Linked Forum
-
Tech2 hours agoUnsurprisingly, Apple's board gets what it wants in 2026 shareholder meeting