Connect with us

Crypto World

UAE-Backed Investor Snags 49% in Trump-Linked Crypto Firm for $500M

Published

on

Crypto Breaking News

A UAE-backed investment vehicle quietly agreed to buy nearly half of World Liberty Financial, a cryptocurrency startup linked to President Donald Trump, just days before he returned to the White House, according to a report by The Wall Street Journal.

Aryam Investment 1, an Abu Dhabi entity backed by Sheikh Tahnoon bin Zayed Al Nahyan, signed a deal in January 2025 to purchase a 49% stake in World Liberty Financial for $500 million, the Journal said, citing documents and people familiar with the matter. Half of that amount was paid upfront, sending $187 million to Trump family‑controlled entities, with additional tens of millions flowing to entities tied to co-founders, including relatives of US Middle East envoy Steve Witkoff, according to the report. The agreement was reportedly signed by Eric Trump. The Journal noted that the deal had not been publicly disclosed at the time, even as World Liberty later disclosed that the Trump family’s stake had fallen sharply.

The collaboration sits at the intersection of geopolitical investment, crypto fundraising, and political entanglements that have periodically resurfaced in Washington and on Wall Street. While the deal was described as a purely private transaction between Aryam Investment 1 and World Liberty Financial, it has drawn scrutiny because WLFI’s own governance model channels a substantial portion of token revenue to entities tied to the Trump family, raising questions about conflicts of interest and governance integrity in crypto ventures with political stakes.

Tahnoon’s ambitions grow after Trump election

Tahnoon bin Zayed Al Nahyan, the UAE president’s brother and the country’s national security adviser, has positioned Abu Dhabi as a global hub for artificial intelligence and high‑tech investment. During the Biden era, his push to license and secure advanced U.S.-made chips faced obstacles amid concerns about sensitive technology reaching China, including through firms associated with the UAE’s tech giant G42. After the 2024 election, a shift in emphasis appeared to accelerate collaboration with Washington on AI and semiconductor access, with Tahnoon meeting repeatedly with Trump and senior U.S. officials as policymakers weighed new frameworks for tech collaboration and export controls. Within months, reports emerged of the United States committing to provide the UAE access to hundreds of thousands of advanced AI chips annually, a development observers tied to a broader strategy of aligning security interests with technology partnerships.

Advertisement

The Journal noted that executives from G42 helped manage Aryam Investment 1 and took board seats at World Liberty as part of the deal, effectively making Aryam the startup’s largest outside shareholder. In the meantime, another Tahnoon‑led firm, MGX, reportedly used World Liberty’s stablecoin to complete a $2 billion investment into Binance—a move that occurred weeks before the U.S.-UAE chip framework was announced. WLFI’s governance structure has remained controversial, with critics arguing that a majority of token revenue ultimately flows to entities tied to the Trump family, potentially influencing outcomes in a project that operates at the confluence of crypto finance and political influence.

World Liberty and the White House have publicly denied any wrongdoing. Spokespeople told the Journal that President Trump was not involved in the deal and that it did not provide any leverage over U.S. policy. The company and its supporters argue that private sector investments in digital assets are common and should be judged on commercial grounds rather than political implications. Still, the ties between a state-backed investor, a Trump‑connected crypto project, and a governance model that centralizes revenue on a single family’s entities have kept the story in lawmakers’ sights and on the radar of crypto watchers who track how policy and capital interact in the sector.

Recent reporting has underscored the broader risk landscape surrounding WLFI and its token sales. In particular, U.S. lawmakers have raised concerns about whether WLFI conducted governance token sales in ways that could circumvent sanctions regimes or enable illicit actors to gain influence over a high‑stakes crypto enterprise. The debate intensified as critics pointed to blockchain addresses associated with sanctioned actors and other regions that the Wall Street Journal’s reporting connected to WLFI token dynamics.

World Liberty faces US probe calls

Last year, Democratic senators urged regulators to scrutinize WLFI’s token offerings amid concerns about improper governance and potential links to sanctioned entities. In a November letter to the Justice Department and Treasury, Senators Elizabeth Warren and Jack Reed cited claims that WLFI governance tokens were moved through blockchain addresses linked to North Korea’s Lazarus Group, as well as entities with Russian and Iranian associations. The letter urged authorities to examine whether WLFI’s sale and distribution practices violated existing sanctions or other federal rules. The controversy has been further complicated by WLFI’s ownership structure, which concentrates token revenue in Trump family‑affiliated channels, raising questions about governance and accountability in a political‑crypto hybrid business.

Advertisement
  • The WSJ’s reporting on Aryam Investment 1’s $500 million stake in WLFI and the related cash transfers to Trump family entities.
  • The involvement of G42 executives in Aryam’s governance and the board seats they secured at World Liberty.
  • Regulatory and congressional scrutiny over WLFI token sales, including a November letter from Warren and Reed citing sanction concerns.
  • Public denials from World Liberty and the White House about any wrongdoing or policy leverage arising from the deal.

Why it matters

The episode spotlights how geopolitical capital, crypto fundraising, and political entanglements can intersect in ways that prompt questions about governance, transparency, and risk management in digital-asset ventures. When a state-backed investor channels hundreds of millions into a crypto startup that ties revenue to a political family, observers worry about conflicts of interest, the potential for policy influence, and the adequacy of independent governance in a sector that remains under intense regulatory scrutiny.

From a policy perspective, the arrangement underscores the ongoing challenge for regulators and lawmakers: how to distinguish legitimate strategic investment from arrangements that might create perverse incentives or circumvent safeguards. The scrutiny over WLFI’s token sales—tied to sanctioned actors per a congressional letter—highlights the delicate balance between encouraging innovation and enforcing sanctions, anti-money-laundering, and know-your-customer standards in a rapidly evolving ecosystem. The denials from WLFI and the White House provide a counterpoint, but they do little to quell broader questions about accountability when political and financial interests converge in crypto ventures.

For the market, the case reinforces the importance of clear disclosures and robust governance when politically connected entities participate in crypto projects. It also signals that geopolitics can continue to shape investor sentiment and regulatory expectations in crypto, influencing which partnerships endure and how tokens are valued. As the U.S. and its allies negotiate frameworks around technology sharing, export controls, and AI governance, the fate of WLFI and similar ventures may hinge on whether transparency and independent oversight can withstand heightened political scrutiny.

What to watch next

  • Regulatory responses: any formal inquiries or filings related to WLFI’s token governance, sanctions implications, or the Aryam‑World Liberty arrangement.
  • Public disclosures: whether WLFI or World Liberty release additional details about ownership, token distributions, or new governance clauses addressing revenue flows.
  • Policy developments: updates to the US‑UAE chip framework or related AI export controls that may affect future cross‑border crypto investments.
  • Governance shifts: any changes in the board composition of World Liberty and how those changes influence decision‑making and fund flows.

Sources & verification

  • Wall Street Journal reporting on Aryam Investment 1’s 49% stake for $500 million in World Liberty Financial, including the upfront payment to Trump family entities.
  • WSJ coverage of G42 involvement and board appointments as part of the World Liberty deal.
  • Senators Elizabeth Warren and Jack Reed’s November letter to the Justice Department and Treasury regarding WLFI token sales and sanction‑related concerns, cited in public reporting.
  • Public denials from World Liberty Financial and the White House about wrongdoing or policy leverage arising from the deal.

Market reaction and key details

The broader market context for this development is one of ongoing scrutiny around crypto fundraising, governance, and political entanglements. While the deal underscores how strategic state-backed capital can intersect with crypto startups, it also underscores why investors and policy makers alike are watching how these relationships are disclosed and governed. In a sector that prizes speed and secrecy, the need for transparent governance structures and clear accountability mechanisms has never been more evident. The interplay between geopolitical interests, high‑profile personalities, and digital asset ventures will likely continue to shape both policy debates and market behavior in the months ahead.

Risk & affiliate notice: Crypto assets are volatile and capital is at risk. This article may contain affiliate links. Read full disclosure

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Crypto World

Euro Consolidates After the Impulse: Market Awaits Macro Data

Published

on

Euro Consolidates After the Impulse: Market Awaits Macro Data

The euro has moved into a phase of correction and consolidation ahead of key macroeconomic releases. In EUR/USD, a technical pullback is unfolding following the previous decline, while EUR/CAD continues a more extended corrective move within its medium-term structure. Market activity is easing as traders await important data from the euro area, the United States and Canada, which could determine the next directional move.

In the euro area, the focus is on Germany’s GDP figures, the GfK consumer climate index and business activity indicators. These releases will help assess the resilience of the region’s largest economy amid a slowdown in the manufacturing sector. Weak data would increase pressure on the euro, while more solid readings could support attempts at stabilisation.

In the United States, investors are monitoring developments in the mortgage market, upcoming comments from Federal Reserve officials and oil inventory data. Trade policy also remains a source of uncertainty. President Donald Trump announced the introduction of a temporary global tariff of 10% for 150 days, with the administration not ruling out a further increase to 15%. The postponement of harsher measures has slightly eased tensions, yet ongoing trade risks continue to influence currency markets, including the euro and commodity-linked currencies.

EUR/USD

After the resumption of the downward move in EUR/USD last week, buyers managed to find support near 1.1740. A retest of this level and a rebound towards 1.1840 helped establish the boundaries of the current sideways range. Technical analysis points to consolidative trading conditions. A sustained move above 1.1840 could pave the way for gains towards 1.1900–1.1920. A break below 1.1740 may trigger a fresh bearish impulse.

Advertisement

Key events for EUR/USD:
– today at 09:00 (GMT+2): Germany GDP;
– today at 09:00 (GMT+2): Germany GfK Consumer Climate Index;
– today at 16:30 (GMT+2): speech by FOMC member Thomas Barkin.

EUR/CAD

EUR/CAD has been trading sideways for more than a month. The pair is testing 1.6180 as resistance and 1.6080 as support. A break above the upper boundary could lead to further gains towards 1.6200–1.6230. Conversely, a move below 1.6080 may open the way for a retest of the psychological 1.6000 level.

Key events for EUR/CAD:
– today at 15:30 (GMT+2): Canadian corporate profits;
– today at 17:30 (GMT+2): US crude oil inventories;
– tomorrow at 15:30 (GMT+2): Canadian wholesale sales.

Trade over 50 forex markets 24 hours a day with FXOpen. Take advantage of low commissions, deep liquidity, and spreads from 0.0 pips (additional fees may apply). Open your FXOpen account now or learn more about trading forex with FXOpen.

This article represents the opinion of the Companies operating under the FXOpen brand only. It is not to be construed as an offer, solicitation, or recommendation with respect to products and services provided by the Companies operating under the FXOpen brand, nor is it to be considered financial advice.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Crypto World

Will Shiba Inu price drop as whale transfers 370B SHIB to exchange?

Published

on

Will Shiba Inu price drop as whale transfers 370B SHIB to exchange? - 1

Shiba Inu is back in focus after on-chain data showed a large holder moving hundreds of billions of tokens to a centralized exchange, raising fresh concerns about potential sell pressure.

Summary

  • On-chain data from Arkham shows a whale transferred roughly 370 billion SHIB to Binance and Bitget deposit addresses, raising concerns about potential sell pressure.
  • SHIB is trading near $0.00000601, holding short-term support at $0.00000580–$0.00000590, with resistance at $0.00000640 and $0.00000700.
  • Indicators remain cautious: the Awesome Oscillator is still negative but weakening, while the MFI around 44 signals limited buying momentum.

According to data from Arkham Intelligence, a whale address deposited roughly 370 billion SHIB to exchange wallets in a series of transactions over the past 24 hours. The transfers, routed to both Binance and Bitget deposit addresses, totaled several million dollars in value.

Will Shiba Inu price drop as whale transfers 370B SHIB to exchange? - 1

Large exchange inflows are often interpreted as a sign that a holder may be preparing to sell, as tokens moved off self-custody and onto trading platforms increase immediate circulating supply.

While it is not yet confirmed whether the whale intends to liquidate, the timing comes as SHIB continues to trade in a broader downtrend, adding weight to bearish sentiment.

Advertisement

Shiba Inu price action and key levels

On the daily chart, SHIB is currently trading near $0.00000601, consolidating after a prolonged slide from January highs near the $0.00000900 region.

Will Shiba Inu price drop as whale transfers 370B SHIB to exchange? - 2
SHIB price analysis | Source: Crypto.News

Price recently bounced from the $0.00000580–$0.00000590 support zone, which has acted as a short-term floor. A decisive breakdown below this region could expose the next psychological support around $0.00000550, followed by deeper support near $0.00000500.

On the upside, immediate resistance sits near $0.00000640, where recent daily highs were rejected. Above that, stronger resistance is clustered around $0.00000700, a level that capped the mid-February rebound.

Bulls would need a sustained move above $0.00000700 to shift short-term structure back in their favor.

Advertisement

Momentum indicators show tentative stabilization but no strong bullish reversal yet. The Awesome Oscillator (AO) remains slightly negative, though red histogram bars are shrinking, suggesting bearish momentum is weakening but not fully reversed.

The Money Flow Index (MFI 14) sits around 44, below the neutral 50 mark, indicating modest capital outflows and a lack of strong buying pressure.

Together, the indicators point to consolidation rather than immediate breakdown but they also fail to confirm a bullish shift.

If the 370B SHIB deposit translates into aggressive selling, pressure on the $0.00000580 support zone could intensify. A breakdown would likely accelerate downside momentum. However, if support holds and exchange inflows do not materialize into sustained sell volume, SHIB could remain range-bound between $0.00000580 and $0.00000640 in the near term.

Advertisement

For now, whale activity adds uncertainty but the chart suggests bears still hold the broader structural advantage unless key resistance levels are reclaimed.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Crypto World

MSTR tops list of most heavily shorted stocks, but don’t assume pure bearishness

Published

on

Highest short interest outstanding as a percentage of market cap (Goldman Sachs)

The market for Bitcoin-holder Strategy (MSTR) shares is among the most “heavily shorted,” a market slang term for dominance of bearish plays, according to FactSet and Goldman Sachs data. Yet the positioning may not reflect investor bias toward a continued price crash, per some observers.

According to the report released last week, bearish short bets on Strategy (MSTR) equaled 14% of its market capitalization of $34 billion at the time, making it the most shorted stock by that measure. Cryptocurrency exchange Coinbase (COIN) ranked fourth at 11% of its market cap. The report tracked positioning in stocks with market capitalization of over $25 billion.

This comes as Strategy is sitting on roughly a $7 billion unrealized loss on its bitcoin holdings. That figure, however, has no impact on the stock in the near term. Strategy began adding BTC to its balance sheet in 2020 and has since gobbled up 717,722 BTC, worth $47 billion. As of writing, its market cap stood closer at $42 billion, despite the stock falling 20% year-to-date.

One explanation for the elevated short interest offered by analysts is the basis trade – a strategy that seeks to profit from the price difference between two related markets. In this context, traders may bought bitcoin spot ETFs, like BlackRock’s IBIT, while simultaneously shorting the MSTR stock. to profit from a narrowing of MSTR’s premium to its BTC holdings narrows, plus any funding from paired futures if layered on, while staying market neutral.

Advertisement

“I suspect a lot of this short interest is still MSTR / BTC basis trade. Jane Street, in particular, has recently acquired a conspicuously large IBIT position,” Brian Brookshire, specialist in bitcoin treasury companies, said.

According to recent 13F filings, Jane Street purchased more than 7 million shares of BlackRock’s iShares Bitcoin Trust. It also held a large position in MSTR.

If Brookshire’s instincts hold, Jane Street’s purchases of IBIT could be a part of the carry/basis trade, paired with short positions in MSTR.

So far this year, that trade would have not worked. The MSTR-to-IBIT ratio is up about 12%, meaning MSTR has outperformed IBIT on the downside. MSTR is down 20% year to date, while IBIT has fallen 27%.

Advertisement
Highest short interest outstanding as a percentage of market cap (Goldman Sachs)

Highest short interest outstanding as a percentage of market cap (Goldman Sachs)

Source link

Continue Reading

Crypto World

Institutional ETF Flows Tilt Toward This Altcoin in February

Published

on

Solana ETF flows in February

Solana exchange-traded funds (ETFs) are diverging from broader crypto ETF trends this month. While demand for Bitcoin and Ethereum products has shown signs of cooling, Solana-linked funds have maintained steady inflows.

The shift comes amid heightened volatility in digital asset markets. With macro uncertainty weighing on investor sentiment, ETF flows may be offering a signal of where institutional capital is positioning in the short term.

Solana ETF Streak Stands Out in Volatile Crypto Market

According to data from SoSoValue, Solana ETFs have recorded consecutive inflows since February 10. As of February 24, the products have logged only three red days this month. Overall, the ETFs have pulled in $30.33 million. 

The streak stands out against the more uneven performance seen in larger crypto ETFs during the same period.

Advertisement
Solana ETF flows in February
Solana ETF flows in February. Source: SoSoValue

Bitcoin ETFs have posted mixed results in February. Inflows were recorded on seven trading days this month. Ethereum ETFs have followed a similar pattern, reflecting inconsistent demand rather than sustained accumulation. 

Despite those positive sessions, cumulative flows remain deeply negative. So far this month, Bitcoin ETFs’ net outflows stand at $939.94 million. In addition, Ethereum ETFs recorded outflows of $490.58 million.

When compared to other altcoin products, Solana’s performance also appears relatively stronger. XRP-linked ETFs have experienced outflows on three trading sessions this month while recording zero flows on four days. 

Although the number of positive sessions is comparable, the consistency of Solana’s streak since mid-February remains notable.

Nonetheless, it is important to contextualize the data. In absolute dollar terms, inflows into Solana ETFs remain smaller than those seen in Bitcoin products. 

Advertisement

Bitcoin and Ethereum ETFs continue to command the majority of institutional crypto exposure and overall capital allocation. However, consistency in flows can indicate relative resilience in demand during periods of broader uncertainty.

The steady inflows into Solana products suggest that some investors are maintaining or selectively increasing exposure to higher-beta assets, even as flagship crypto ETFs experience uneven demand. Still, the divergence may reflect short-term capital rotation rather than a structural shift in institutional positioning.

SOL Price Remains Under Pressure 

Despite the ETF inflows, Solana’s price performance has continued to reflect broader market weakness. Like most major digital assets, SOL has trended downward over the past month, declining 32.8%.

The altcoin saw a modest recovery today, rising more than 7% as total crypto market capitalization expanded by approximately $32 billion. At press time, SOL was trading at $82.15.

Advertisement
Solana (SOL) Price Performance.
Solana (SOL) Price Performance. Source: BeInCrypto Markets

However, technical analysts remain cautious on the asset’s near-term outlook. Market commentator Alejandro suggested that Solana’s next downside target could be $45.

Whale Factor described the token as entering a high-probability “make or break” zone on the 4-hour chart. According to the analysis, SOL’s wedge formation is “reaching maximum exhaustion,” signaling a potential volatility squeeze at a critical inflection point.

The analyst outlined two possible scenarios:

“Bull Case: Clean break and retest of $82 targets the $97-100 macro resistance. Bear Case: Failure to hold the $78 support level opens the door for a retest of $68.”

Whether Solana will extend its recovery or face renewed downside pressure remains to be seen.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Crypto World

Bitcoin Rebounds as Traders Debate Jane Street “10am Price Slam”

Published

on

Bitcoin Rebounds as Traders Debate Jane Street "10am Price Slam"

Bitcoin (BTC) sought to reclaim $65,000 as support into Wednesday’s Wall Street open as rumors swirled around US institutional pressure.

Key points:

  • Bitcoin bounces 2.5% as talk turns to alleged selling pressure from Wall Street trading company Jane Street.

  • Jane Street rebuts claims of crypto market manipulation during the 2022 bear market.

  • “Razor thin” order books boost BTC price volatility.

Bitcoiners debate Jane Street “10am price slam”

Data from TradingView tracked a BTC price rebound, taking BTC/USD to $66,300 on Bitstamp before the pair consolidated.

BTC/USD one-hour chart. Source: Cointelegraph/TradingView

Daily price gains remained at more than 2% at the time of writing, while crypto market participants became increasingly interested in potential deliberate BTC price suppression.

A theory circulating on social media revolved around secretive quantitative investment firm Jane Street, now subject to legal action by defunct crypto company Terraform Labs.

Advertisement

Coordinated algorithmic selling of Bitcoin at 10am Eastern time daily, it alleged, provided the main impetus for months of BTC price downside beginning in October 2025.

Amid the ongoing legal proceedings, Jane Street may have been forced to suspend its trading strategy, leaving the market to adjust higher.

The Terraform Labs complaint makes specific reference to “market manipulation” that impacted crypto throughout 2022, the year in which Bitcoin put in its last bear market bottom of $15,600 in Q4.

Advertisement

Jane Street told Cointelegraph that the accusations were “baseless, opportunistic claims.”

The 10am argument, meanwhile, failed to convince many. Crypto YouTuber Wise Advice was among them, suggesting that the theory was too simplistic to be valid.

BTC price versus “razor thin” liquidity

Commenting on the latest BTC price move, traders remained cautious.

Related: Bitcoin ETF sell-off is ‘purification’ of bull case, investor says

“$BTC is facing major resistance at $66k – from both the local range lows and the 4h trend,” trader Jelle wrote in his latest analysis on X. 

“Flipping that could spark short-term relief, but until that happens, the trend is clear. Don’t fight it.”

BTC/USD four-hour chart. Source: Jelle/X

Keith Alan, cofounder of trading resource Material Indicators, said that a “razor thin order book” on exchanges had contributed to the price rebound.

Overhead sell liquidity, he told X followers, had been pulled in advance of US President Donald Trump’s State of the Union address.

Advertisement

The 24-hour crypto liquidations totaled $333 million at the time of writing, per data from CoinGlass, with shorts accounting for $213 million of that figure.

Crypto liquidation history (screenshot). Source: CoinGlass