By Robert Scucci
| Published 19 seconds ago

Have you ever wondered why everybody in The Simpsons is yellow? There are some fun theories out there, like the entire town of Springfield suffers from radiation poisoning, or that Homer is yellow because of cirrhosis due to drinking heavily. But in order for those theories to work, we need to ask ourselves why all the cousin-marrying residents of Shelbyville are also yellow, and why Homer’s alcoholism would make the rest of his family yellow. The real reason The Simpsons are yellow is actually the result of a brilliant hunch from Georgie Kovacs Peluce, one of the colorists over at Klasky Csupo.

Originally, The Simpsons shorts were going to be black and white, until the fledgling animation studio told Simpsons producer James L. Brooks they would mock up some colored character designs free of charge. There were several iterations and permutations of the characters before they were ever seen on screen, some of which used the traditional peach and tan tones that other animated series use. Peluce had something else in mind, and took it upon herself to design the characters with yellow skin, and, in Marge’s case, blue hair. This initial concept was met with pushback for looking “freakish” by some reps at Gracie Films, Brooks’ production company, but Brooks, Groening, and some of their associates fell in love with it because they knew it would pique viewer curiosity. 

From Throwaway Idea To Final Design

It’s hard to imagine a world in which The Simpsons didn’t exist, but the world wasn’t always like that. Back in 1987, a few short years before Simpsons mania conquered the world, the “nuclear” family was nothing more than a rush job by creator Matt Groening, who was approached by James L. Brooks to produce a show based on his Life in Hell comics, an intellectual property that the cartoonist didn’t feel comfortable selling the rights to. Instead, he quickly whipped up a cartoon family based on his own, pitched The Simpsons to Brooks, and we’d first meet Homer, Marge, Bart, Lisa, and Maggie through short-form animated skits on The Tracey Ullman Show.

Groening, being totally inexperienced in television at this point in his career, figured that his drawings would be animated in black and white, but the animation studio behind the shorts, Klasky Csupo, had something else in mind. According to Stupid TV, Be More Funny: How the Golden Era of the Simpsons Changed Television – and America – Forever, it was the animation studio that encouraged The Simpsons shorts to be colored in the first place. They were asked to animate everything in black and white as a cost-cutting measure, until Gabor Csupo insisted on trying colored versions as well, offering to do the extra work for free.

Several iterations of the Simpson family were mocked up, but one version from Georgie Kovacs Peluce stuck out more than the rest. Georgie’s design involved yellow skin and blue hair, something that “didn’t look like anything that had come before,” and the design won over Brooks and Groening. The logic was simple: while people were channel surfing, they’d feel more inclined to stop dead in their tracks if they saw a cartoon family that looked so unique. 

Back in those days, home viewers didn’t have a lot of options, often switching back and forth between ABC, NBC, CBS, and the new and struggling Fox network. In essence, the desired reaction would involve somebody watching one of the other networks flipping through the channels during a commercial break, catching a glimpse of the Simpson family, saying “what the hell is this?” and ending up watching the whole short.

Peluce’s instinct paid off because that’s exactly what happened, and it was only a matter of time before The Simpsons took the nation by storm, eventually becoming the longest-running animated show in television history. And to think, we almost got a black-and-white version that probably would have been squashed before anybody even knew who they were.

The Simpsons can be streamed on Disney+.

Brooks Marks, star of Bravo’s “Next Gen NYC,” is gearing up for season 2 of the popular reality show. During a new interview, Brooks, the son of “The Real Housewives of Salt Lake City” star Meredith Marks, is revealing what he’s learned most about himself since stepping in front of the camera.

“Oh, I mean, I’ve learned that I really hate confrontation,” Brooks told PEOPLE in May 2026. “I feel like I knew I did, but I never recognized how intense my hatred of confrontation was and to the point that it was almost hurting me and making situations deeper than they needed to be.”

Indeed, during season 1 of the reality show, Brooks bumped heads with his co-star, Charlie Zakkour, after the latter made suggestive comments about hooking up with Brooks’ younger sister, Chloe. The uncomfortable situation, however, helped Brooks develop a tougher exterior.

“And so I feel like it’s helped me overcome that and become a more confrontational person and made me more direct as well, which I’m grateful for,” he said.

Brooks Marks Says His Relationship Will Be Shown On Season 2 Of The Show

In a separate interview with Us Weekly, Brooks confirmed that the new batch of episodes, airing on Bravo June 24, will showcase his relationship with his boyfriend.

“I think you’ll see more about my relationship life in season 2,” he said, adding that it’ll be a bit different for his partner, Kade, since he isn’t in the spotlight.

“My boyfriend isn’t really in the public, so it’s definitely a new world for him,” Brooks said. “I love keeping that sacred but, at the end of the day, I signed up for reality TV.”

According to Brooks, being part of the Bravoverse means baring your soul—even if it’s frightenining.

“It’s all about showing every aspect of our lives,” he said. “I hope that it shows other people what a great relationship can look like.”

‘Next Gen NYC’ Is Bringing The Drama To Bravo

In addition to Brooks, season 2 of “Next Gen NYC” will feature returners Ariana Biermann, Riley Burruss, Emira D’Spain, Ava Dash, Gia Giudice, Georgia McCann, Charlie Zakkour, Shai Fruchter, and Hudson McLeroy. The new season will also feature newcomers Rowan Henchy, Liam Obergfoll, and Kendall White.

According to a previous report from The Blast, the new season will be packed with drama as the cast navigate their personal relationships and address scandalous headlines.

“Eager to carve out their own identities, they’re determined to make it on their own terms while also navigating the pressure to curate the right vibe, the right circles, and a feed that keeps up with the life they’re chasing. In a world driven by image, ambition, and constant visibility, they quickly learn that making it is one thing — holding onto it, and each other, is another,” the show’s synopsis reads.

Other ‘Housewives’ Kids Are On ‘Next Gen NYC’

Brooks isn’t the only child of a “Real Housewives” cast member part of the “Next Gen NYC” cast.

Gia is the daughter of “RHONJ” star Teresa Giudice, while Arianna and Riley are the daughters of “RHOA” alum Kim Zolciak and Kandi Burruss.

While they grew up in front of the cameras, Kandi previously admitted to giving her daughter a bit of advice on navigating the world of unscripted television.

“Well, I just told her don’t be on there [and] say anything that you ain’t going to stand behind. You got to make sure you keep it honest on this show,” Kandi said. “And even if you say something they don’t like, just own it and keep it pushing.”

Riley Is Proud Of Her First Season On The Show

Riley, meanwhile, opened up about her first season on the show last year and said she was “proud” of how she handled herself.

“I think the thing I’m most proud of is how well I articulated myself [throughout the whole season]. At first, I thought that I didn’t do as great. In the moment, you’re emotional, you’re not really realizing how it’s going,” Riley shared.

Advertisement

The first Oscar Awards, honoring films released between July 1927 and August 1928, were held on May 16, 1929, at the Hollywood Roosevelt Hotel. That night saw Wings take home the inaugural Academy Award for Outstanding Picture, launching a lineup of nominees that would later become classics. Interestingly, almost 100 years after that first ceremony, all the films on that list are available to see in some way, shape, or form. All but one, that is: 1928’s The Patriot, a film that is completely lost.

A Tyrant Is Toppled In 1928’s ‘The Patriot’

Set in Imperial Russia, The Patriot tells the story of the final days of Tsar Paul I (Emil Jannings), a tyrant ruling through cruelty and fear. Yet the despot was paralyzed by a fear of his own, that he is doomed to be assassinated like his ancestors before him. He trusts only one man: his Prime Minister, Count Pahlen (Lewis Stone). Pahlen is loyal to the Tsar, but is deeply troubled by the horrors Paul unleashes upon his people. His conscience no longer able to separate duty from morality, Pahlen commits to bringing about the Tsar’s downfall. To that end, he encourages Stefan (Harry Cording), a soldier who recently faced the wrath of Paul for minor uniform violations, to join him in his pursuit, promising him vengeance.

As Paul becomes increasingly unbalanced, obsessing over trivial matters while disregarding affairs of state, Pahlen rallies conspirators at court. Pahlen even turns to Crown Prince Alexander (Neil Hamilton), but the prince makes it clear he won’t support treason. So Pahlen turns on him, branding him a traitor and prompting Paul to place Alexander under arrest. Pahlen’s plan is free to be implemented, only for Paul to inadvertently upset it by announcing he’s leaving the city with his mistress. To keep Paul from leaving, Pahlen shows him a portrait of Countess Ostermann (Florence Vidor), the woman he loves, hoping the ravishing beauty will tempt Paul to stay.

It works, with Paul demanding to meet the Countess, so Pahlen arranges a meeting. Paul unsuccessfully tries to proposition her, but the disgusted Countess rejects him and, betrayed, reveals the plan to assassinate Paul. Paul demands an explanation from Pahlen, who craftily claims to have gained the conspirator’s trust, ready to expose them when the time is right, and offers his own life to regain trust. Satisfied, Paul retires to his room, but as he sleeps, a group of conspirators enters, waking him, with Stefan ignoring his pleas and murdering him. As the people celebrate, Stefan appears and shoots Pahlen, the consequence of his actions, and as he lies dying in the Countess’ arms, he says: “I have been a bad friend and lover—but I have been a ‘Patriot’.”

What Remains of ‘The Patriot’ Only Makes Its Loss a True Tragedy

The Patriot is a part-talkie, representative of that brief period between silent films and full-on talkies, with its sound effects heavily promoted, including Jannings’ “agonized roar” as something that had to be heard to be believed (technically, however, still a silent film: the only silent film to be nominated that year, per The Week. As such, the film would be a much-coveted prize for any cinephile, for the industry as a whole, for that matter, but to date it remains lost. All that remains is a few recovered pieces, currently stored in the UCLA non-circulating nitrate vaults, and one reel out of 10 found in Portugal in 2001.

Interestingly, one of the pieces that exists in its entirety is the trailer for the film itself, lauding Emil Jannings’ performance as the Mad Tsar. It’s a tease of a classic film we’ll never see, making The Patriot‘s loss a true tragedy. In the brief moments we see in the footage, Jannings is positively gripping, a vision of unmitigated madness that instantly catches your attention. And the direction of auteur Ernst Lubitsch looks to be epic, with a glimpse of one dramatic scene shot from overhead that features Jannings’ Tsar Paul I encircled by his countrymen, with Paul defiantly lashing out as they close in, telling a story in itself.

Not all hope is lost, of course: Gugusse and the Automaton, a long-lost 1897 film by Georges Méliès featuring film’s first robot, was found in Michigan just recently in an old trunk. And we are talking about a film nominated for Best Picture, not like a throwaway project made to fill theater seats, so the odds are certainly better than they might be otherwise. But until such time, we can only rue the absence of the film that stands as the lone project preventing the Oscars from claiming a complete catalog. For the record, The Patriot may not have won Best Picture, or Best Director, Best Actor (Lewis Stone) or Best Art Direction, but it did win for Best Writing. Hopefully, one day audiences will finally be able to judge it for themselves.

Advertisement

The Patriot

Advertisement

Release Date

September 1, 1928

Runtime

Advertisement

113 minutes

Director

Ernst Lubitsch

Advertisement

Writers

Ashley Dukes, Hanns Kräly

Advertisement

Cast

Advertisement

• 

  Emil Jannings

  Czar Paul I

• 

  Florence Vidor

  Advertisement

  Countess Ostermann

• 
• 

  Vera Voronina

  Mademoiselle Lapoukhine

  Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

In 2025, The Gorge delivered an unexpected love story in an atmospheric setting where military values are shattered in the light of survival and hope. If you enjoyed the vast isolation in the sci-fi, dystopian setting, but would have preferred a more serious approach to the fight for survival and military rhetoric, then you need to watch 2023’s Last Sentinel. The thriller is The Gorge meets Jaws, where one’s fear of the ocean is transfigured into something more apocalyptic and all-consuming, as staring out into the empty skyline makes one feel like the only person left on earth. Here, the sea levels have engulfed the planet, leaving two distinct land masses that are waging war against one another, turning this nightmarish landscape into a question of whether war is worth it.

The Relentless Sci-Fi Thriller ‘Last Sentinel’ Creates an Atmospheric Dystopian Apocalypse

Set 40 years into the future, Last Sentinel takes us to a military outpost in the middle of the ocean, where four soldiers are desperately hanging onto survival as they wait for the relief crew, who are three months overdue. At this point, the soldiers’ hope is waning, especially when an unfamiliar vessel is spotted, one that could belong to the enemy. They are led by the no-nonsense, anything-for-the-mission Sergeant Hendrichs (Thomas Kretschmann); Baines (Martin McCann), the unruly engineer that keeps the technology running; Sullivan (Lucien Laviscount) works the comms and is also responsible for hauling in fresh fish; and Cassidy (Kate Bosworth) is the level-headed second-in-command, who also happens to be entangled in a romantic relationship with Sullivan.

While the plot itself hits fairly familiar sci-fi beats, the dystopian world-building is immersive and mesmerizing. Many renditions of the future tend to lean towards clinical, advanced technology or a dilapidated, apocalyptic landscape, but Last Sentinel somewhat blends the two. The technology the crew uses to survive is still fairly modern despite the rust — including iodine baths to reduce the impacts of radiation or sonar equipment — but there is a distinct sense of desolation and brutality in seeing water, wind, and storm as far as the eye can go. It’s even more chilling to imagine that the world is simply reduced to the undulating landscape we see on-screen, where the only variations occur from the choppiness of the water or the strength of the wind. Between the camerawork and the set pieces, you truly feel like you’re alongside them, succumbing to the bleakness of their everyday reality, punctuated only by frantic moments of survival.

‘Last Sentinel’ Is Anchored by Gritty and Emotional Performances

Driving the narrative forward and contributing to the atmosphere are the four central characters of Last Sentinel, each making their mark through their often clashing personalities. Cassidy’s vague role on the crew could have easily led to the character fading into the background, but Bosworth ensures she is still imperative in her own right. She becomes the steady anchor whose serene but hardened personality makes the grim circumstances of the setting feel bearable, and we often look to her as a baseline for the unfolding fight for survival. We only ever get to peer behind the curtain whenever Bosworth shares the screen with Laviscount, as their chemistry endears us to these two characters who seek companionship in such an alienating environment.

Meanwhile, Hendrichs and Baines embody the warring themes in the film: survival and war. At the crux of Last Sentinel is the idea of whether sacrificing oneself and one’s peace for a cause is ever worth it, especially in such extreme, apocalyptic circumstances. While Hendrichs soldiers on with his military values, Baines offers another point of view in an unexpected way, eventually becoming the most important character later on in the film thanks to his philosophy on swallows. As the plot twists and turns, the film weaves this debate effortlessly into the drama, heightening the impact of the barren and memorable setting.

Coming away from Last Sentinel, you’ll never be able to look at the ocean the same way again. The film constructs a dread-laden world that can still foster hope in the wake of destruction — one that is easy to get lost in, as the characters and the themes make the mere idea of water feel haunting.

Meghan Markle reportedly feels she’s being made to play by a “different rulebook” altogether as compared to her estranged sister-in-law, Kate Middleton.

Having both carried out similar activities in recent months, including trips abroad and sharing pictures of their family, Meghan garnered backlash for using her children to “stay relevant” while royal fans gushed over Kate.

The Duchess of Sussex believes Kate and her husband, Prince William, are still “bad-mouthing her” and remains puzzled as to why people keep thinking the Princess of Wales is faultless.

The longstanding rift within the royal family has seemingly taken a more divisive turn, with hopes of a potential reconciliation further tossed down the drain.

According to Star Magazine, a source close to Meghan has revealed that she increasingly feels she is being made to play by a “different rulebook” than her sister-in-law, Kate Middleton, amid their ongoing rift.

The former “Suits” actress’s suspicion reportedly comes from the public and media reception of her actions, which she feels carries a critical weight that Kate simply does not face.

For instance, Kate and William recently celebrated their 15th wedding anniversary with cute family photos, including their children and pet, after which they shared a sweet portrait of their daughter Charlotte to celebrate her 11th birthday.

Meghan also did something similar days later, as she took to social media to share a post in honor of her son Archie’s seventh birthday. One photo saw him and his sister Lilibet bonding together, while another had him lying on his dad, Prince Harry’s, chest as a baby.

While Kate’s post left fans gushing about her cute family dynamics, Meghan came under fire for the same, with critics accusing her of “pimping their children to stay in [the] media spotlight.”

The Duchess Of Sussex Believes The Princess Of Wales Will Always Be The ‘Golden Girl’

The source who spoke to the news outlet shared that the Duke and Duchess of Sussex feel like “there’s one set of rules for William and Kate and another for them,” going on to add that “the resentment over the double standard is bubbling up again.”

The insider went further to note that Kate and William are also “clearly using their children as part of the royal image and the branding of the family,” but quizzed why Harry and Meghan are not allowed to do the same.

“Yet Meghan’s been criticized for even including the smallest glimpse of Archie and Lilibet. She feels like she’s constantly being judged by a completely different rulebook, and no matter what she does, Kate will be the golden girl, and she will be the villain,” they added.

Meghan Markle’s Strained Relationship With Kate Middleton Affected Her Stay In The Palace

After stepping back from their royal roles in 2020, Harry and Meghan hurled similar allegations against the royal family, including claims that some family members made life hard for the As Ever founder.

Her relationship with Kate also didn’t kick off on a high note, particularly because of a 2018 clash involving bridesmaid dresses that left the future queen in tears ahead of Meghan and Harry’s wedding.

Although Meghan claimed Kate later apologized, her frosty relationship with the mother-of-three seemingly took a toll on her stay within palace walls, as Kate was always the more favored wife of the two of them.

“Once the word was out that they didn’t get along, the writing was on the wall,” the source told Star. “Meghan knew at that point that her future within The Firm — as well as the U.K. as a whole — was doomed.”

The Duchess Feels Her Family Is Being Compared To Kate and William’s

Meanwhile, talks suggesting that both royal families are being compared all over again have started springing up.

Harry and Meghan recently completed a four-day Australian tour where they took part in some charitable and business ventures.

After that, Kate announced that she was proceeding on a solo trip to Italy for her work with early child development. In fact, reports also suggest that William and Kate will likely proceed on a “revenge tour” to Australia to take the shine off Harry and Meghan’s visit.

“There’s definitely a sense in royal circles that the competition stakes have been reignited again,” the source said.

Meghan Markle Is Reportedly Frustrated With How Kate Is Viewed As A ‘Sweet’ And ‘Faultless Person’

And now, Meghan is even more convinced that Kate is being protected by powerful forces within palace walls who are also out to paint her as the big bad guy.

“Meghan has no doubt the Waleses are still stirring the pot and bad-mouthing her,” the insider noted. “That’s the main reason why it rankles and affects her so much.”

The Montecito-based royal is said to have grown frustrated that Kate continues to be viewed as flawless despite the rancors that have ensued privately behind palace walls.

“Meghan would love one day to expose how Kate isn’t this sweet, faultless person that everyone seems to think,” the source added. “Meghan says their unfortunate showdown before the wedding was just one example of how frosty and controlling Kate can be.”

I’ve learned the hard way that not all “easy” spring tops are actually that way — especially at 5’3”. What’s meant to look breezy can quickly turn boxy, oversized or just slightly off, throwing off your whole outfit. When your style priorities shift toward looking polished (but still effortless), those small fit issues matter even more.

Instead of settling, I went looking for spring tops that truly work for petite women over 40. The kind that skim instead of cling, add shape without bulk and feel intentional the second you put them on. From airy blouses to everyday staples, these 17 styles are the ones that actually fit right — and make getting dressed feel easy again.

17 Flattering Spring Tops for Women Over 40 Actually Fit Right

1. Our Favorite: Tunics usually swallow me at 5’3″, but the pleating on this chiffon option gives it shape. The V-neck keeps proportions in check.

2. Floral Favorite: The puff sleeves on this white floral blouse add just enough volume to balance my petite frame. Short sleeves keep it from feeling fussy when temperatures climb.

3. Office-Ready: The V-neck and ruffle details on this chiffon office blouse dress up plain trousers without much effort. The short sleeves also fit under a blazer without any bulk.

4. Waist-Defining: I love that this waist-defining blouse creates shape without shapewear. The V-neck and cap sleeves balance proportions, giving me a bit of playful volume up top without overwhelming.

5. Custom Fit: The drawstring waist on CiCiBird’s chiffon button-down lets me create a custom fit. Peplum hem adds movement without clinging in an awkward way.

6. Pretty Puff Sleeve: The peated babydoll cut on this puff-sleeve V-neck flows away from the midsection, disguising bloating and keeping me comfy. The pretty puff sleeves also add to the chic factor.

7. Everyday Ease: At under $10, this floral V-neck tee punches above its price. The short puff sleeves add a little interest to an otherwise basic shape.

8. Must-Try: I get hot easily, so Dokotoo’s breathable eyelet blouse is a real win. The short, slightly voluminous sleeves give it shape without adding warmth.

9. Shopper-Favorite: I was skeptical of the hype, but this shopper-favorite blouse earns it. The drape flatters without needing to be tucked.

10. Playful Pattern: I throw this collared V-neck blouse over white jeans for weekend errands. It reads put-together even when I’m running on three hours of sleep.

11. Pastel Perfection: The smocked crew neck on this pastel floral blouse sits flat against the collarbone. Ruffled sleeves and a flowy body give it an easy yet fun boost.

12. Square Neck Staple: Square necklines flatter my collarbones better than scoops, so this pink striped top was an immediate add-to-cart. The not-so-simple sleeves make this tee-like top stand out from the pack.

13. Peplum Perfection: The pleated babydoll shape on this V-neck blouse has it flowing past the waist instead of cinching or constricting. It’s also slightly structured, giving it a wealthy, polished-looking twist.

14. Boutique-Looking: The embroidery detail on this V-neck floral blouse looks like something you’d pull from a boutique rack. The contrasting detail down the middle also adds extra interest.

15. Luxe Lace: Made of lace with 3/4-length sleeves, this chic lace blouse covers the upper arm without overheating. The fabric drapes instead of stiffening, so you’ll still feel comfy while looking cute.

16. Pretty Polka Dots: The black and white polka dots on this collared button-down make it both timeless and statement-making, while the short sleeves are spring-appropriate.

17. Ravishing Ruffles: The ruffle cuffs on this V-neck ruffle blouse add drama without looking over-the-top. The 3/4 sleeves also hit at a flattering point on the forearm, so you feel covered yet comfortable at the same time.

Related: 17 French-Girl Style Spring Dresses With Parisian Boutique Energy

French-girl style isn’t about having more clothes — it’s about having the right ones. Usually, that means one really good dress you can rely on when you don’t feel like overthinking your outfit but still want to look put-together. It skims in the right places, moves easily and somehow works for everything from daytime plans […]

Advertisement

It’s fair to say that the pool of people who don’t have at least one streaming subscription is small, with 83% of the U.S. population currently watching content on at least one streaming platform. However, a recent study shows that about 40% of Americans are cutting back on their subscriptions — not ditching them outright, just being more selective in what they keep. Even in such an environment, the number of subscribers to Disney+ is, at worst, maintaining the status quo, or, per the company’s 2025 fiscal report, growing moderately, but that could stil be bad news for riskier TV shows.

Disney Has Been Embracing Nostalgia and Proven Franchises

A conglomerate like Disney could go in one of two directions in response to this development. On the one hand, they could make bold, risky TV shows that draw in new subscribers willing to check out exciting and new content. On the other, they could fall back on the tried-and-true: reboots, remakes, legacy sequels, and proven franchises.

Time and again, Disney makes a calculated gamble that either fails outright or doesn’t succeed enough, and cuts bait, or they find success with a project and ride the wave until it’s been milked dry. Pirates of the Caribbean: The Curse of the Black Pearl was a gamble that worked, and then they rode the franchise to oblivion with increasingly tired sequels. But now, instead of taking a bold risk, they’re actually going back to the franchise with a sixth film. Adapting The Lion King for live-action wasn’t exactly a big risk, but it paid off. However, instead of taking risks with something new, they’re revisiting each one of their animated classics to do the same thing.

The same thing has already happened with Disney+. WandaVision was the first MCU TV series, but with interest in the franchise sky-high, it was hardly a risk — until the service became oversaturated with MCU content. Daredevil: Born Again definitely marked a change for the streamer, a decidedly TV-MA series unlike the bulk of Disney+’s content, yet the success of Deadpool & Wolverine proved that there was a market for it. And the revival of beloved sitcom series Malcolm in the Middle, Malcolm in the Middle: Life’s Still Unfair, simply wasn’t going to fail.

Disney+ Could Play It Safe, but at a Cost

It is, in fact, the last two that most likely point to the direction Disney+ goes to address their subscriber-dilemma-that-isn’t-really-a-dilemma dilemma. Both leverage known properties in the hopes of boosting their subscription numbers by wooing fence sitters with the nostalgia of the latter, and the “more of what you loved in 2024” in the former. Anything that proves to be divisive in the least, like Goosebumps, Willow, or The Acolyte, already has a short leash, so the odds that Disney+ is going to give safe harbor to series that automatically lose half their audience off the bat are slim, at best, when shows that are guaranteed a built-in audience that also have the potential to pull in others are far more appealing.

As it is, anything truly risky is kept at arm’s length by falling under the Hulu banner. But as Disney+ continues to integrate Hulu into the parent app, series that benefit from that separation, your Shōgun or Dopesick, for example, are more likely to fall to the lowest common denominator – the inoffensive, non-divisive content – than the other way around. It sounds ridiculous, perhaps, but former Disney CEO Bob Iger has more or less suggested that this is the direction they plan to go in to improve subscriber growth.

Making creative, risky content is, unsurprisingly, not part of the plan, and that is going to come at a cost for Disney. Nostalgia and safe bets have done the job to date, but the unwillingness to take risks with their content has an inherent flaw. Sure, their long, storied history has allowed them to utilize the nostalgic element longer than most. But it’s bold, original ideas that really drive people to streamers, as Stranger Things did for Netflix. It was something that easily could have failed, but the benefits ultimately outweighed the drawbacks.

Moves like that are appealing to creatives in the field, directors, and actors who want to work with companies that allow them a degree of creativity. If Disney+ moves towards a controlled environment for the projects it allows, and there’s little to suggest they won’t, they will become a pariah to the truly creative who are looking to take risks, and instead attract lesser talent willing to work within a box for the pay. And with people becoming more discerning about what they’re opting to stick with for streamers, it’s a price that Disney+ may rue not having paid from the outset.

“The Secret Lives of Mormon Wives” star Taylor Frankie Paul is being torched online after posting a video of herself dancing with one of the men from her canceled season of “The Bachelorette.” The criticism comes weeks after the TV personality made headlines amid explosive drama with her ex-boyfriend, Dakota Mortensen, which paused production on season 5 of “SLOMW” and led sponsors to end their contracts with the show and its stars.

Paul posted a recent Instagram video of herself dancing with one of the men from her canceled season of “The Bachelorette,” Shane Parton, and addressed claims that the contestants were upset with her over the cancellation of their season.

In the clip, they’re dancing to Outkast’s “Hey Ya,” and over top of the video, Paul wrote, “Oddly, we all became closer.” In the video’s caption, Paul said that many of the men “have shown consistent kindness” throughout the chaos.

She finished the clip by telling Parton, “Tell your parents they can come visit now that I got extra space.”

Advertisement

Paul’s statements come weeks after Disney and ABC pulled her season of the show, which would’ve been airing right now.

The cancellation came after Utah police officers confirmed that they were investigating an alleged domestic dispute between Paul and Mortensen.

Days later, a shocking video showing Paul appearing to strike Mortensen and throw metal chairs at him went viral.

“In light of the newly released video just surfaced today, we have made the decision to not move forward with the new season of The Bachelorette at this time, and our focus is on supporting the family,” a spokesperson from Disney said.

Social media users didn’t hold back their true feelings about Paul’s latest post in the comments, given one person wrote, “You’re constantly trying to PROVE to us that people are on your side…”

Advertisement

Another user shared, “It’s OK to go a day without posting something. How exhausting… Take a day off.”

A third wrote, “Hey girly, so this is all consequences of your own actions, and it’s OK to take some time away to save your kids’ future.”

The Drama Surrounding Taylor Frankie Paul Affected ‘The Secret Lives Of Mormon Wives’

The relationship drama between Paul and Mortensen impacted more people than just them. According to PEOPLE, production on the show’s upcoming season was paused in March 2026 and resumed in late April of that year.

Adding to the drama, one of the show’s sponsors, Cinnabon, cut ties with the show, announcing that it had decided to move in a different direction. “Recent developments and allegations surrounding the lead cast member led us to reassess this collaboration as it no longer aligns with our brand values,” their statement read.

Drama Is Brewing Between ‘SLOMW’ Castmates

Throughout the madness, Paul’s “SLOMW” co-star, Mikayla Matthews, told the world that she was setting clear “boundaries” with the mother of three moving forward, adding that Paul’s personal woes have made her “sick to my stomach.”

She went on to say that she would no longer “enable poor or dangerous behavior” from Paul or Mortensen, noting that their children matter most. “That doesn’t mean I don’t love them or want the best for their individual futures. It just means I cannot sit here and pretend it’s OK that years of destructive behavior are now being discussed more than ever online and turned into a ‘pick a side’ game,” Matthews added.

Advertisement

According to Matthews, the mother of four has been a loyal friend to Paul throughout her public scandals, but recently, she’s decided to distance herself for her own well-being.

Paul Implies Matthews Is Jealous Of Her

Paul clapped back at Matthews’ post, implying that the 26-year-old was jealous of her and her successes.

“She is the epitome of someone that was waiting for my downfall and not only watched it, but clearly kicking me too. I rarely, if ever, cried to her for help,” Paul posted. “[My Mormon Wives castmates] always wanted an update on my life, let’s not get that twisted. She is ‘exhausted of me’ as I tried to stay home and suffer in silence.”

Paul went on to say that she was “fed up” with the double standards, adding that she’s been a good friend to Matthews amid her own struggles.

“Clearly she can’t do the same. PS: she can find her way to the door if she doesn’t want to film with me. Next,” she finished.

Advertisement