Gwen Stacy has been one of the biggest missing pieces in Marvel Studios’ Spider-Man corner of the universe for years. That absence has only become more noticeable as the character has flourished across other Spider-Man media, from Emma Stone’s fan-favorite portrayal in The Amazing Spider-Man films to Hailee Steinfeld’s breakout performance as Spider-Gwen in Sony’s wildly successful Spider-Verse franchise. If you really want to be thorough, you can also count Bryce Dallas Howard’s brief appearance in Sam Raimi’s Spider-Man 3 — though that version of Gwen rarely enters the conversation these days. Either way, Marvel is finally bringing Gwen Stacy into the mix in 2026.

The catch is that her debut won’t be happening alongside Tom Holland‘s Peter Parker on the big screen. Instead, Gwen is set to make her first Marvel Studios appearance in Your Friendly Neighborhood Spider-Man Season 2, the animated Disney+ series returning in fall 2026. While the show is produced by Marvel Studios, it exists in its own alternate timeline rather than the MCU’s “Sacred Timeline,” meaning this won’t be the Gwen Stacy who eventually crosses paths with Holland’s Spider-Man in Spider-Man: Brand New Day.

Showrunner Jeff Trammell has already confirmed Gwen’s arrival for Season 2, but recent social media teases have revealed even more. In a post shared to Instagram, Trammell showcased early character sketches of Gwen in both her everyday civilian look and her full Spider-Gwen costume, effectively confirming that this version of the character won’t simply be another student at Midtown High. While Marvel hasn’t revealed exactly how she acquires her powers, the artwork strongly suggests Gwen will play a significant role both in and out of costume when the series returns.

How Good Is ‘Your Friendly Neighborhood Spider-Man’?

Season 1 may have already planted the seeds for her introduction. In the premiere, Peter Parker is bitten by a radioactive spider after it falls through a mysterious portal, leaving open the possibility that the same spider — or another altered spider — could continue its journey through Midtown. Season 2 was officially confirmed for fall 2026 during New York Comic Con, and Trammell’s earlier comments hinted that Gwen would be one of the major additions to the next chapter, alongside escalating symbiote storylines and the return of Charlie Cox‘s Daredevil. So while Marvel may not be introducing a live-action Gwen Stacy into Holland’s world just yet, it is finally bringing one of Spider-Man’s most iconic supporting characters into the Marvel Studios fold.

In his review for Collider, Mike Thomas noted that while Your Friendly Neighborhood Spider-Man may not rank alongside the very best Spider-Man animated series, it succeeds by embracing its own identity. Originally conceived as a much more direct MCU prequel, the project eventually evolved into a looser reimagining of Peter Parker’s early years. That creative shift allows the series to remix familiar Spider-Man mythology without being constrained by established continuity, giving classic characters and storylines room to feel fresh again.

Your Friendly Neighborhood Spider-Man Season 1 is streaming now on Disney+, and is due to return with Season 2 this fall.

The latest installment in the Scary Movie franchise might have taken last weekend’s box office top spot, but the parody of modern horror movies isn’t dominating general movie discourse. The viral masterpiece Obsession and A24’s Renate Reinsve and Chiwetel Ejiofor-led Backrooms continue to be the talk of Tinseltown, although they’ll face some tricky new competition this weekend, with the arrival of Steven Spielberg‘s long-awaited Disclosure Day. From the allure of the big screen to the best of the small, there is also plenty worth watching on streaming. With that in mind, here’s a list of three movies you should stream this weekend on Netflix.

For more recommendations, check out our list of the best shows and movies on Netflix.

Disclaimer: These titles are available on US Netflix.

1

‘Father of the Bride’ (1991)

Rotten Tomatoes: 71% | IMDb: 6.6/10

It’s officially wedding season, and this weekend might be the perfect time to get in the mood with an undeniable classic of the genre. If you’re a fan of Hulu’s Only Murders in the Building, then 1991’s Father of the Bride is a must-watch, featuring the very best of Steve Martin and Martin Short‘s undeniable comedic chemistry.

The film stars the former as George Banks, a man whose life is turned upside down when his precious daughter returns from studying abroad engaged. With the wedding planning in full swing, George struggles to come to terms with his daughter’s marriage. A remake of the 1950 film of the same name starring Spencer Tracy​​​​​​, this hilarious, heartwarming ’90s comedy gained some particular emotional poignance last year, following the passing of the great Diane Keaton.

2

‘Hot Summer Nights’ (2017)

Rotten Tomatoes: 46% | IMDb: 6.4/10

Ahead of Dune: Part Three, the final installment in Denis Villeneuve‘s adaptation of Frank Herbert‘s novels, this December, why not check out one of star Timothée Chalamet‘s most underrated movies on Netflix? The neo-noir thriller Hot Summer Nights follows Chalamet’s sheltered teenager Daniel, who comes of age during one wild, romantic, and chaotic summer.

Also starring Maika Monroe as the free-spirited McKayla, Hot Summer Nights features a Chalamet performance that, although it might not receive much recognition, is arguably one of his best. Its story might not be anything new, but it’s told with an eye for visual beauty, and makes for an indulgent coming-of-age tale that will keep you hooked this weekend.

3

‘The Big Lebowski’ (1998)

Rotten Tomatoes: 79% | IMDb: 8.1/10

One of the most famous cult classics of all time, the Coen brothers‘ The Big Lebowski is now universally beloved for good reason, and remains a movie everyone should watch at least once. The movie stars Jeff Bridges as the iconic The Dude, a man who thrives on living life in the slow lane. However, after being mistaken for a millionaire of the same name, he becomes embroiled in an unlikely world of crime.

One of Bridges’ best performances that even spawned its own mock religion, The Big Lebowski is both laugh-out-loud funny and utterly enthralling. The Coens at their quirky, twisty best, the film is best known for featuring some of the finest ensemble characters in ’90s cinema, from John Goodman‘s Walter to Julianne Moore‘s Maude.

Advertisement

Release Date

March 6, 1998

Advertisement

Runtime

117 minutes

Director

Advertisement

Joel Coen

Writers

Ethan Coen, Joel Coen

Advertisement

Producers

Ethan Coen

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Taylor Swift’s rumored wedding plans have become one of the most talked-about celebrity stories of the summer, but new reports suggest fans may not have the full picture. 

Speculation recently exploded after claims surfaced that the pop superstar and former NFL champion Travis Kelce were preparing to host a massive wedding celebration at Madison Square Garden. 

However, insiders now say the widely discussed venue could be serving an entirely different purpose as the couple reportedly works behind the scenes to keep their actual ceremony private.

Rumors surrounding Taylor Swift’s wedding gained traction after reports claimed she and Travis Kelce planned to marry at Madison Square Garden on July 3.

The reported celebration was said to involve more than 1,000 guests, including family members, celebrity friends, and high-profile figures from both the music and sports worlds.

The idea immediately divided fans. Some questioned whether the singer who once wrote about longing for privacy would choose such a massive public venue for one of the most important moments of her life.

“This is beyond trashy,” one critic wrote online, adding,  “It is genuinely the most attention-seeking, fanfare-heavy, tacky situation that I couldn’t even have concocted in my own head.”

Another commenter referenced Swift’s song “The Lucky One,” noting, “Yuck, in her song ‘the lucky one’ about not loving being famous […] that was in two thousand TWELVE when she was TWENTY TWO what happened to her intelligence and common sense in the years since. Cognitive decline.”

Swift’s Reported Ceremony May Be Far Smaller Than Expected

While rumors about a Madison Square Garden wedding spread online, sources told the Daily Mail that the reports may not reflect the couple’s actual wedding plans.

According to insiders, Taylor Swift’s official ceremony is expected to be significantly smaller. “Taylor’s official wedding will not have 1,000 guests,” one source said.

The insider claimed a highly private and secured ceremony has already been planned for the couple’s closest loved ones.

The source also revealed that guests attending the larger celebrations have reportedly been encouraged to donate gifts to charity. 

While details remain tightly guarded, the source hinted that Madison Square Garden still has some involvement. According to them, “There is something [else] associated with MSG.”

Taylor Swift’s Team May Be Using A Strategic Diversion

Another source suggested that the Madison Square Garden rumors may actually be serving a purpose. According to the insider, guests have reportedly been told only one thing so far.

“QR codes are going to be sent to guests. The only instructions they have are to arrive at MSG on July 3,” the source explained.

Many attendees reportedly believe the arena could function as a staging point before guests are transported elsewhere. 

As the insider put it, “A lot of guests think this may be a security screening to [then] go elsewhere because MSG is equipped for that with their facial recognition etc. But something involving the wedding is set there.”

The theory has led many fans to believe Swift may be orchestrating a carefully planned “bait and switch” to protect her privacy.

Swift’s Rhode Island Mansion Remains A Strong Possibility

Although New York remains at the center of most speculation, another possible location continues to generate buzz.

Several insiders pointed to Taylor Swift’s Rhode Island mansion, known as High Watch, as a likely setting for an intimate ceremony. “The strong rumor is the location will be in New York,” one source explained.

After considering various destinations, the couple reportedly prioritized security above all else. “Finally, they decided the only place that will guarantee them the most security is High Watch,” the source added.

The $17 million oceanfront estate has long been one of Swift’s most treasured properties and would offer the privacy many believe she desires.

The singer’s connection to New York remains undeniable, however. From purchasing multiple Tribeca properties to writing songs inspired by the city, it continues to play a significant role in her personal story.

Taylor Swift And Travis Kelce Are Reportedly Planning A Celebration Tour

Even if the ceremony itself remains intimate, sources suggest the festivities could stretch far beyond a single day. One insider revealed that Rhode Island, New York, and Kansas City may all become part of an extended celebration.

“Before Travis has to return to his NFL commitments, they are also looking to treat the entire [July 4] weekend and the weeks before the end of July as a continuous celebration,” they noted. 

The source described the plans as “a little bit of a wedding tour.” According to another insider, the Grammy Award winner wants every detail to feel distinctive.

According to them, “She wants it to feel truly unique and unlike anything she’s done before – a one-of-a-kind event that reflects her style and vision in a way only Taylor can do it.”

One thing attendees seem to agree on is that the celebrations will not be quiet. “Travis and Taylor enjoy having cocktails and dancing and having a good time, so everyone’s expecting a late night party into the wee hours of the morning,” a source said.

Another insider added that while rumors continue to swirl about surprise performances, “nobody knows anything” because guests have signed NDAs and are keeping details under wraps.

Helen Mirren is throwing her support behind Tom Hardy after rumors swirled that he was fired from their show MobLand.

In an interview with Variety published on Thursday, June 11, Mirren, 80, was asked whether she would continue to work with Hardy, 48, following the drama.

“Absolutely. In a f***ing heartbeat,” the Oscar-winning actress responded.

Mirren continued to rave about the Inception star, praising his acting skills and claiming that she was fine with an actor going through their own methods to achieve great results on camera.

“I love Tom, I think he’s the most amazing actor,” she told the outlet. “Different actors have different processes. I’ve learnt over the years that some people get to things faster. As long as what’s on the screen is fantastic, I’m totally chilled with however someone gets there. Tom is a very special person. I think he’s absolutely remarkable. My support of him is genuine and heartfelt.”

Last month, Hardy’s alleged behavior made headlines after multiple outlets reported the actor was fired from the Paramount+ show for its potential third season due his behavior. (MobLand season 3 has yet to be officially confirmed. Season 2 is expected to air later this year.)

According to a Puck report in May, Hardy was allegedly fired from MobLand after filming wrapped on season 2. The outlet alleged that Hardy was late to set, asked to give notes on the script and attempted to change dialogue.

A source also told The Hollywood Reporter the same month that Hardy “refused to come out of his trailer for hours at a time.”

Variety, meanwhile, reported that Hardy “was not fired.” A source close to production told the publication that “the door is not closed for season 3 and things are being worked through creatively.”

Thank You!

You have successfully subscribed.

Related: 7 Shows to Watch If You Like Tom Hardy’s MobLand

Advertisement

Paramount+ has had a lot of success with shows about antiheroes on the wrong side of the law. That trend continues this month with the debut of MobLand, a new crime series starring Tom Hardy, Pierce Brosnan and Helen Mirren. Harry Da Souza (Hardy) is thrust into a mob war between two of London’s rival […]

Neither Hardy nor Paramount have addressed the allegations. Us previously reached out to representatives for Hardy, Paramount+ and MobLand producer 101 Studios for comment.

Following the reports, Mirren appeared to weigh in on the drama via an Instagram Story post shared on May 28. Alongside a photo of Hardy, she wrote, “Love you now and always, Helen.”

In MobLand, Hardy portrays Harry Da Souza, a fixer for the Harrigan crime family in London. Mirren, Pierce Brosnan, Paddy Considine and Anson Boon also star as members of the Harrigan family. Filmmaker Guy Ritchie serves as the series’ executive producer and director. Hardy also serves as an executive producer.

By Chris Snellgrove
| Published 6 seconds ago

It’s been a pretty weird year for David Harbour. On one hand, he’s celebrated some major career milestones, like wrapping up Stranger Things and bringing his oddball MCU character back for Avengers: Doomsday. On the other hand, he’s been involved in some very notable celebrity scandals. The first was when the Daily Mail ran a story claiming that his Stranger Things costar Millie Bobby Brown had filmed a harassment and bullying campaign against him. The second was when his ex-wife, Lilly Allen, released an album all about their nasty breakup, one which included salacious details about Harbour’s love life.

For a long time, Harbour said nothing about Allen’s album or the pseudo-allegations she makes against him (which she freely admits may not all be true) in its songs. Now, he recently opened up about many of the biggest stresses of the past year, including watching his emotionally wrenching breakup turn into a highly public sex scandal. For the most part, the Stranger Things star kept it classy and only emphasized one point: that he remembers things very, very differently than his ex-wife does.

When The TV Lawman Marries A Rebel

Grab your popcorn and buckle up, because you’re going to need some context for this insane tale. It all starts with David Harbour marrying Lilly Allen. They were such an unpredictable pairing (he’s a gruff movie star and she’s a free-spirited singer) that the internet soon fell in love with this power couple. Those online fans were understandably disappointed when these celebs got divorced in February 2025. Normally, that would be the end of it, and everyone would find a new celeb pairing to obsess over. But Allen ended up releasing an album called West End Girl that seemingly spilled all kinds of tea about her topsy-turvy relationship with Harbour.

The singer never said the album was explicitly about Harbour, and in one interview, she said of the lyrics that “I don’t think I could say it’s all true.” Nonetheless, the lyrics seemed very much directed at her ex-husband: Allen sang about breaking up with a spouse who was jealous of her growing success as an actor and wasn’t ready for a long-term commitment. In the album, she claims that this husband kept an entirely separate apartment dubbed “the P*ssy Palace” where he could have affairs with other women. Since the husband was a thinly veiled stand-in for Harbour, the lyrics (which included salacious details about preferred sex toys) amounted to musical allegations against the Stranger Things star.

Everything Blows Up

For a very long time, Harbour said nothing about West End Girl; meanwhile, Allen went viral for wearing receipts from gifts Harbour allegedly bought affair partners. Recently, the Stranger Things veteran spoke about the album for the first time in an interview with Variety. “It was weird,” he said at first. He then demurred about what Allen said about him: “I do believe that it is the privilege of every artist to use their experience to create art, and so I respect her for doing that.” He explained that he didn’t want to discuss things in much detail because “In spite of the fact that a lot of people don’t allow me a private life — I value it. And I also value the lives of the people that I interact with privately. I just won’t speak about that.”

When the interviewer offered one last chance for David Harbour to push back against Lily Allen’s lyrical claims, the Stranger Things star continued to demur by noting that “stories are complex…and that’s why I say I respect her creation of art to channel her experience.” He then finished his thoughts by saying what countless jilted ex-boyfriends and ex-husbands have said about their partner’s allegedly hellish time in the relationship. “It wasn’t my experience.”

The No-Win Scenario For Celebrity Break-Ups

Fans hoping for something a little more salacious (like a comment about the aforementioned sex toy) are likely to be disappointed that Harbour didn’t spill more of the dirty deets. However, there’s almost nothing he could say here that wouldn’t damage his career. If he tries to defend himself too loudly, he would almost certainly be labeled misogynistic, abusive, uncaring, and so on. Which is, ironically enough, exactly what would happen if he took a different tack and claimed that all of Allen’s lyrics were correct. 

Harbour effectively chose the only path left to him, which was to be slightly defensive but non-committal enough to ensure one thing: that those Marvel checks just keep on coming, baby!

There are a lot of television shows that simply could not be made today. Even though they may have been super popular at the time they aired, we’ve (hopefully) evolved as a society. Many of the themes that seemed acceptable then just wouldn’t be today. Looking back on sitcoms like Three’s Company and Bosom Buddies, they now feel troubling with obvious themes of homophobia and transphobia. Some shows have characters that perpetuate tired tropes, such as the annoying, nagging wife, featured in series like Everybody Loves Raymond and Married… With Children. There’s one more example of a sitcom that could never be produced in today’s climate, and it’s pretty shocking that we once thought it had an acceptable premise.

What Is ‘My Boys’ About?

My Boys was a TBS sitcom that aired on the cable network from 2006 to 2010. The four-season show centers around PJ Franklin (Jordana Spiro), a female sportswriter for the Chicago Sun-Times, who is desperately trying to find love. The problem is that PJ is just “one of the boys,” and loves sports, playing poker, and drinking beer. She can be brutally honest and a bit blunt, qualities that turn off her potential suitors. PJ is surrounded by guys, and these lovable doofuses are like family to her. She does have one best friend who’s a woman. Stephanie Layne (Kellee Stewart) does her best to advise PJ on dating, but she can’t quite work her magic enough to help PJ find Mr. Right. Viewers seemed to enjoy watching PJ and her best buds, but TBS eventually decided to cancel the show after 49 episodes, leading to My Boys becoming a forgotten sitcom of the early 2000s.

‘My Boys’ Could Never Be Made Today

There are some episodes of classic sitcoms that feel a little cringey upon rewatching (like Monica in a fat-suit on Friends), but the entire premise of My Boys wouldn’t sit right with today’s audiences. PJ is a successful woman who’s working at her dream job. But the whole gist of the show is that she’s too boyish to find a boyfriend. The series spends way too much time focusing on PJ needing to land a man than any other aspect of her life. Instead of capitalizing on PJ’s unique personality, the series instead plays for laughs that she’s too masculine. The writing could have focused on PJ as a fully well-rounded person, but instead zeroes in on how weird she is to be surrounded by men. Even PJ’s best friend wants to change her, and is constantly giving her advice on how to act more feminine. The male characters aren’t really written any better though, since they’re portraying common stereotypes of commitment-phobic playboys and harried husbands. Basically, these characters could be dropped into any sitcom from this time period and feel right at home.

It’s not that there aren’t some redeeming qualities in the series. It does have a fantastic cast, with Jim Gaffigan, Reid Scott, and Jamie Kaler as part of PJ’s gang. Other notable actors like Nia Vardalos, Kyle Howard, Johnny Galecki, and Rachael Harris all pop up over the course of four seasons. There are plenty of silly laughs and a sweet theme of found family. It’s clear that My Boys was trying to capture the magic of a group of supportive pals, found in the uber-popular Friends. But the series would be impossible to make in the present day because of how outdated the premise is. High-quality writing in television shows today doesn’t show women changing themselves just to land a man, and most successful shows are celebrating women who are thriving in their careers. PJ would be a wonderful female protagonist in a show written in 2026, but she definitely wouldn’t be portrayed as flawed or less-than. Of course, even a sitcom today would depict the trials of dating, but PJ wouldn’t be denigrated as a mere tomboy who’s far less interesting than her male friends.

Spiro would go on to an impressive career, with roles in The Mob Doctor, Blindspot, and Ozark, and Gaffigan is a major comedy star now, so it’s not like My Boys didn’t have some importance. The sitcom is still fun to watch, mainly because we can see how far we’ve come as a society in the last 20 years. Viewing the series is like a nostalgic trip to several decades past, but it’s also easy to see that there’s no way this forgotten show would have been greenlit today.

My Boys is available to stream on Prime Video in the U.S.

Advertisement

My Boys

Release Date

2006 – 2010-00-00

Advertisement

Network

TBS

Advertisement

Directors

Barnet Kellman, Arlene Sanford, David Trainer, Arvin Brown, Fred Savage, Matthew Diamond

Writers

Advertisement

Cindy Caponera

Advertisement

• 
• 

  Eddie McClintock

  Uncredited

  Advertisement
• 
• 

  Jordana Spiro

  Bobby Newman

Advertisement

Advertisement

Taylor Swift was supported by fiancé Travis Kelce, her parents, Andrea and Scott Swift, and future mother-in-law Donna Kelce on a very important night in her career.

While the pop star, 36, walked the red carpet solo, the foursome were all seated together at the Marriott Marquis Hotel in New York City on Thursday, June 10, to witness Taylor being inducted into the Songwriters Hall of Fame, per footage shared online. The NFL star apparently was taking time away from his Kansas City Chiefs mandatory minicamp to celebrate his fiancée’s big moment.

Taylor was honored for her contributions to music alongside Gene Simmons and Paul Stanley of Kiss, Kenny Loggins, Alanis Morissette and Christopher “Tricky” Stewart, among others, making her the youngest-ever female inductee, beaten only by Stevie Wonder, who was inducted at age 32.

“Please don’t cheer when I say her name. Wait until the end,” HOF CEO Linda Moran joked during the gala. “[Taylor] is the youngest female to be inducted [in the Hall of Fame].”

Donna and the Swifts have shown up together to support their kids many times throughout Taylor and Travis’ three-year relationship. (The couple announced their engagement in August 2025 and are rumored to tie the knot in New York City later this year.)

This isn’t the first time Andrea and Donna have spent time together publicly while cheering on their kids. The pair have hung out together while supporting Travis’ Kansas City Chiefs and even took a trip together to the Sundance Film Festival in January

Meanwhile, Taylor is in the middle of a whirlwind week, which started with the musician getting Tom Hanks and Tim Allen to sign her vintage Toy Story VHS on the red carpet at the world premiere of Toy Story 5 in Los Angeles on Tuesday, June 9.

Taylor — who recorded the sentimental track “I Knew It, I Knew You” for the Toy Story 5 soundtrack — rocked a Western patchwork dress as she walked the red carpet solo. (Travis was unable to attend the event with her because it was the first day of Chiefs mandatory minicamp at the University of Kansas Health System Training Complex in Kansas City, Missouri.)

Thank You!

You have successfully subscribed.

Advertisement

On Wednesday, Taylor was joined by pals Mariska Hargitay, Alana and Este Haim courtside at Madison Square Garden to watch the New York Knicks score an epic comeback win over the San Antonio Spurs during Game 4 of the 2026 NBA Finals.

Related: Taylor Swift Set to Make History With Songwriters Hall of Fame Induction

Taylor Swift is becoming a member of the Songwriters Hall of Fame’s 2026 class. The organization announced on the Wednesday, January 21, episode of CBS Mornings that Swift, 36 — alongside Walter Afanasieff, Terry Britten and Graham Lyle, Paul Stanley and Gene Simmons of Kiss, Kenny Loggins, Alanis Morissette and Christopher “Tricky” Stewart — will […]

Advertisement

After the Knicks’ big win, the musician also hugged it out with Kylie Jenner, who was sitting courtside with her boyfriend and Knicks superfan, Timothée Chalamet.

This huge week for Swifties continues on Friday, June 11, when Taylor takes part in ABC’s 20/20 special Toy Story: 30 Years and Beyond, in which she shares exclusive insight on writing “I Knew It, I Knew You” for Toy Story 5.

Ashley Judd is living her best life at 58.

Taking to Instagram on Thursday, June 11, Judd shared a video of herself splashing about in the water as she embraced her midlife era.

The post was titled, “We Don’t Care Club: Baltic Sea Edition.” The caption was a nod to the “We Do Not Care Club,” the social media movement created by Melani Sanders, which encourages women to lean into their later years.

“This installment is a healing tonic for a grave condition that often plagues adults and the overly serious: ‘Know-It-All-itis,’ ” Judd wrote in the caption.

Related: Ashley Judd Shows Off Curves in Bathing Suit to Talk About Menopause

Ashley Judd is no longer caring what others think and embracing her inner child as she experiences postmenopause. Judd, 57, took to Instagram on Tuesday, July 22, to share a video of herself splashing around in the Baltic Sea while showing off her curves in a green one-piece swimsuit. “Hi, I’m Ashley and I’m a […]

The actress also made jokes as she frolicked in the sea. “The good news is when it’s shallow you don’t get as much sand in your crotch,” she quipped.

At another point in the video, Judd picked up seaweed, which she called “salad” before shaping it into a crown and describing herself as a “lady of the sea.”

Followers praised Judd’s enthusiastic spirit in the comments section.

“Physical beauty is obvious, you are so radiant and natural, however it’s your childlike happy spirit that is shining! A real mermaid! 🧜‍♀️ Fierce and gentle and of the sea. 🌊” wrote one follower.

Another added, “You are a ray of sunshine in a dark place.”

Judd has previously uploaded videos as part of the “We Don’t Care Club” movement.

“Hi, I’m Ashley and I’m a member of the We Don’t Care Club,” she declared in a July 2025 post. “Sometimes when I wear a swimsuit, I get a little chafing, like right down there, so I put on cornstarch. Good trick if you don’t know it already.”

After showing off a non-stinging type of jellyfish in her hands, Judd placed the sea creature back into the water and said she was “picking my crotch and I don’t care.”

Thank You!

You have successfully subscribed.

Advertisement

Related: Ashley Judd‘s Long Road Back From Shattering Her Leg in DRC

When Ashley Judd shattered her leg on an excursion in the Democratic Republic of the Congo in 2021, doctors told her she may never move her foot again — so she set out to prove them wrong. Judd, 56, took to social media on Monday, May 13, to post a video via Instagram displaying just […]

She told fans about her “MSU Club,” or “Make Stuff Up Club,” and said that as a “postmenopausal woman, I don’t care if you don’t like the MSU Club.”

In a June 2025 Instagram post, Judd candidly opened up about being “post-menopausal since 2018.”

“And super comfortable with that. Peri, menopause, and post-menopause is human biology and medically accurate,” she wrote. “Sex education is essential. I am rejoicing in @justbeingmelani un muzzling of peri/post/menopausal expression and her inviting in all kinds of women to liberate their ‘I don’t cares!’ We are enough, we do enough, it is enough. It is okay, we are okay. It is human biology. Fact and true. To all my menopausal ladies out there, what are your don’t cares?!”

By Chris Snellgrove
| Published 23 seconds ago

While some of his movies could have been better (looking at you, Spectre!), James Bond still has the greatest action franchise in the entire world. From the very beginning, this secret agent established himself as the ultimate man’s man: he always dresses to impress, he knows how to win big at cards, and he’s gifted at seducing the most beautiful woman in the room with a single, well-placed pickup line. When he’s not doing those things, though, he’s saving the world, one memorable shootout and iconic driving sequence at a time.

Now, 007 finds himself at a creative crossroads. Daniel Craig decided to hang up the tux, and nobody has yet been officially cast to take his place as James Bond. Beyond that, Amazon has not officially announced which talented creator will bring the next Bond film to life. Ironically, though, the man they’d kill to hire is someone they can no longer afford: Steven Spielberg, who recently revealed that his offer to direct a Bond film decades ago was rejected. While it would have been cool to see the world’s greatest director take on 007, the blunt truth is that Spielberg would have almost certainly run this franchise into the ground.

Close Encounters Of The Bond Kind 

Recently, Steven Spielberg has been making the rounds to help promote his latest film, Disclosure Day. During an appearance on The Rest Is Entertainment podcast, he revealed something startling: not only had he volunteered to direct a James Bond film, but his offers had been rejected on multiple occasions. He first approached 007 franchise producer Cubby Broccoli after Jaws became a blockbuster hit. “I’d always wanted to make a James Bond film from the day I saw Dr. No, so I called Cubby after Jaws and volunteered,” Spielberg said. “I said, ‘If you need a director, I would love to direct one.’ And he said no.”

A few years later, Broccoli approached Spielberg with a very specific request: he wanted to use the famous five-note melody from Close Encounters of the Third Kind in Moonraker, Bond’s one and only sci-fi adventure. The director responded to Broccoli by saying, “I’ll give you permission to use the five notes if you let me direct a Bond film.” His offer was refused yet again, and while Spielberg let the producer use those notes, he is seemingly still baffled by the constant rejection: “He never explained why he wasn’t letting me into the Bond family.”

Setting A Franchise On Fire

To hear Spielberg tell it, this is an all’s well that ends well story. When he griped about not getting to direct a 007 film to George Lucas, the Star Wars creator invited Spielberg to collaborate on a new character: “Indiana Smith,” who would later be renamed to Indiana Jones. The Jones films helped cement Spielberg’s reputation as the greatest director in the world, and if he were asked to direct a Bond film today, he says his flat response would be, “You can’t afford me.” For all of the director’s sour grapes, though, I’m glad Broccoli rejected his offers because Spielberg would have been terrible for the James Bond franchise.

Why do I think Spielberg would have been a terrible Bond director? For one thing, he is a very visual director in ways that aren’t really suited to the 007 franchise. Think about some of his most iconic shots: the first emergence of the shark in Jaws, the Tyrannosaurus rex chase in Jurassic Park, and so on. These shots were great at establishing these creatures as larger-than-life threats, especially to the puny humans just trying to survive. That doesn’t really work for Bond, though, who is designed as a larger-than-life, borderline superhuman who fights dimwitted bad guys. Basically, in a 007 film, Bond is the dinosaur everyone else is running away from.

The One Hero Spielberg Can’t Handle

As Spielberg himself implies, the closest he came to directing James Bond was directing four of the Indiana Jones films. While those movies are amazing, they also reveal why Spielberg’s style doesn’t work for 007. Spielberg’s action hero is flawed and funny, while Bond is meant to be cool, collected, and (mostly) serious. Plus, the Indy films are built around setpiece-driven action scenes like the rolling boulder in Raiders of the Lost Ark, cutting the bridge in Temple of Doom, etc. That makes for a great spectacle, but it doesn’t exactly build character. Bond’s action is more grounded and more centered on the character, which is crucial for a borderline mythic action hero.

Finally, all of Spielberg’s best creative gears would be wasted on James Bond. There’s no focus on family (found or otherwise) in 007, but this is a staple in movies like E.T. the Extra-Terrestrial, Catch Me If You Can, and especially The Fabelmans. There are no otherworldly things to inspire a sense of wonder in a James Bond movie, but this is the driving force of Spielberg films like Close Encounters of the Third Kind and Jurassic Park. Heck, even the Bond music is so well-established that there’s no chance of Spielberg teaming up with John Williams to deliver fresh music and coordinated visuals, like with the flying bike in E.T.

None of this is meant to dunk on Steven Spielberg. Once more, for the cheap seats, he’s the greatest director in the entire world. But he gained that status by mastering a visual storytelling style that is best suited to certain characters and narratives. Characters out of their depth, heroes fighting monsters, broken people discovering that family matters the most? These are just a few of the things that Spielberg handles best. But Bond is never out of his depth, he only fights humans, and he doesn’t have a family. In short, it’s true Amazon can’t afford Spielberg, but James Bond can’t afford to have this iconic director run this franchise into the ground.