Imagine if the only musical artists from the 1980s you had access to were Madonna, Prince and Michael Jackson. Others, such as David Bowie, Whitney Houston or George Michael are not available because, we’re told, these artists fail to exhibit the same type of creativity as the other three “geniuses”.

It’s clearly madness, yet this in a nutshell is the gatekeeping situation that exists in classical music today.

Zoom back to the 1780s and the musical landscape was astonishingly diverse, with composers across the globe writing bucketloads of music not only for the church, but for theatres, salons, concerts and performance at home. And, contrary to what we seem meant to believe, none of this music was auditioned by a panel of experts with the “best of the best” selected for our moral betterment.

But what we have access to today from the classical era is the tiniest fraction of what was composed then. And of that fraction, we hear a still smaller subset, dominated by just three composers: Mozart, Haydn and Beethoven – as classical music website Bachtrack’s 2025 statistics attest.

Many significant composers haven’t survived as part of the modern classical canon. Take Marianna Martines (1744–1812), for example. She was an extremely popular Viennese composer, singer and keyboardist whose prolific compositional output was so highly rated in her own time that she was the first woman to be inducted into the Accademia Filarmonica di Bologna as a “master” composer.

Performing regularly for Austria’s empress Maria Theresa and sharing the keyboard with Mozart for four-hand duets at her own popular musical salons, she was at the heart of a booming Viennese musical culture.

Where is her music today?

Talent flourishes with investment, and Martines had it all: money, time, geography, social networks and an elite education. In fact, court poet and famed opera librettist Pietro Metastasio personally oversaw her education from childhood.

Martines’ compositional catalogue is substantial, including – strikingly – several large-scale choral-orchestral works such as the impressive Dixit Dominus (1774), 12 keyboard concerti (four of which survive), and 31 keyboard sonatas (three of which survive). Her music isn’t just fine – it is exceptionally good. Just listen for yourself. So why do we not hear her music today?

It wasn’t that she lacked contemporary advocates, and it wasn’t even that she was immediately forgotten after her death. Indeed, she was significant enough to have active detractors who worked to discredit her authority, as music scholar Judith Valerie Engel details in her research.

The problem, then, was not absence of talent, nor even absence of recognition, but the failure of later institutions to keep investing in the conditions that ensure music like Martines’ is heard.

Ensemble music – particularly larger forms such as choral and orchestral music – requires a rather different type of investment. We’re not able to access it without the complex and expensive assembly of notated scores, instruments, large spaces and dozens of people with specialist skills who know how to transform those dots on the page into musical sounds.

At the root of this are repetition and publication, both in text and in sound. Text, for the obvious reason that without access to printed materials – and I mean well-edited printed materials – the music cannot be played and therefore endure.

Music publishers have long been gatekeepers of musical taste, providing editorial credibility and a supply of materials to the market. This curatorial role was usurped by record producers, who determine what gets recorded and circulated – the new modern legitimising “text” of a musical work, as it were.

Repetition is absolutely essential. This crazy process of putting dots of ink on paper to communicate complex sonic and emotional ideas means that musical works rarely reveal their secrets the first time they are played.

In re-performance and re-recording, musical problems are solved and the infinite dimensions of the possible sound worlds are explored. This dialogue between performers does two crucial things in the establishment of a work within the canon. First, it refines the quality of performance and, with that, enhances the evaluation of the work itself. Second, the frequency of performance or recording generates familiarity – a significant driver of musical preference.

My heart genuinely aches when I think about how different my own life would have been had I grown up listening to Marianna Martines’ music alongside that of her contemporaries. So many limiting myths about women’s inherent musical – and therefore artistic and intellectual – abilities might never have taken root in my subconscious.

While in general the ability to produce knowledge and exert influence is increasingly moving away from historical centres of power, public reclamation of received music history still lags far behind, despite the herculean efforts of numerous musicians, musicologists and advocates.

The good news is that listeners have more ability than ever to discover the music that moves them. The intellectual shackles imposed by commercial and academic institutions when it comes to deciding what constitutes “good” music are slowly losing their potency. There is no doubt though, we are now facing a new era of curatorial power in the form of AI algorithms that shape the discovery of music and much else besides.

However, restorative projects such as this first recording of Marianna Martines’s complete surviving keyboard works provide that essential first step of the music’s modern publication.

It is now possible for listeners to discover this music, and for musicians to begin the long, necessary dialogue with it. Only then are we able to reclaim our rightful musical heritage.

The King’s nephew, Peter Phillips, married NHS nurse Harriet Sperling during a private ceremony in Gloucestershire on Saturday, which was attended by King Charles III and Queen Camilla.

The King and Queen joined members of the royal family, including the Prince and Princess of Wales, Princess Beatrice and Princess Eugenie and Princess Anne.

The venue, All Saints Church in Kemble, was chosen because Sperling lived in the village when the couple met.

Read more about the day here.

The Monaco Grand Prix has been a source of anger and frustration for many F1 stars

The Monaco Grand Prix is arguably the most recognisable and famous race on the Formula 1 calendar. It’s also the most contentious.

This year’s race will get underway on Sunday afternoon, with Kimi Antonelli taking pole ahead of Max Verstappen and Lewis Hamilton. Despite being one of sport’s most eye-catching events, the circuit has come in for strong criticism from drivers, with George Russell even calling for the event to be ‘scrapped’

Complaints have raged about the lack of space to overtake on the iconic track due to modern cars that are too wide. Due to Cadillac’s involvement this season, 22 cars will race around the tight streets for the first time since 2016, only heightening the tension, with many drivers branding the race “boring”.

The Monaco GP is set to remain on the calendar until 2035, however. Here, Mirror Sport takes a look at what several F1 stars have said about the Grand Prix.

Lewis Hamilton

Charles Leclerc won his first Monaco Grand Prix in May 2024, but Lewis Hamilton was unhappy with the processional nature of the race.

JOIN US ON FACEBOOK! All the best sports news and much more on our dedicated Facebook page

He said: “It was non-eventful. Everyone drove so slowly. It didn’t matter what tyre you were on. We were driving seconds off the pace. I don’t know what it was like watching but I am sure people were falling asleep. We have to find ways of spicing it up a bit more, maybe three mandatory stops?”

Speaking after the 2018 edition, he said: “We were just cruising around from lap six, literally cruising. So it wasn’t really racing. If that was exciting for you to watch, no problem.”

Advertisement

Hamilton said the race was “the longest 78 laps ever”, telling BBC Sport: “It was a super-unexciting race for everyone. We are driving at high speed, there is not a lot of action, you’re just trying to bring it home, for 56 laps. Oh my God, it was long. Forty laps to go, I was like, ‘Oh God, please’. When it finished, I was like, ‘Thank goodness’.”

Max Verstappen

Also voicing his concerns in the 2024 race, four-time world champion Verstappen, while sitting in in sixth, told his team across the radio: “F*** me, this is really boring. I should’ve brought my pillow.”

He later said: “We are driving literally half-throttle on the straights, in a higher gear than you would normally do, four seconds off the pace. That’s not really racing.

“We all know in Monaco what it is like. In the last few years it is even more difficult with the width of the cars but it is nothing new. First I would like to change if possible a few little things because it would make will make it more exciting.

“Overall the weekend is really cool but it’s the Sunday race that is a little bit boring. The scenery is still great but if we could find a way to race better that would be my preferred solution. And if they asked for my opinion I would try to see what is possible.”

Fernando Alonso

The 2018 edition was particularly controversial, as drivers slowed to ensure the ‘hyper-soft’ and ‘ultra-soft’ tyres reached the required stint lengths.

The race was won by Daniel Ricciardo, with Sebastian Vettel coming second and Hamilton in third. Fernando Alonso was unhappy with the result. He said: “Extremely boring. This is probably the most boring race ever.”

The experienced Alonso claimed Monaco’s races had always been the same, saying the wider current cars are not an issue. He said: “I never overtook any car. You see one overtake every 10 years.”

Lando Norris

Speaking at Thursday’s pre-race press conference, the McLaren star was asked how challenging the circuit would be in qualifying with 22 drivers on the track.

Norris said: “Probably pretty [challenging]. I mean, well, I have three in a practice session with a lot more cars on track. It’ll be tough. It’s already been tough in previous years with people not getting out of the way in the right places and things. It’s tricky.”

Speaking in 2025 on how Monaco could be improved, he said: “I don’t think you can really change the race apart from if you make the cars half the size of what they are now.

“I don’t think it needs to change that much. It’s never been anything else than what it has been now. So I think people should just be happy with what it is.

“Monaco has never been a race that’s been good on Sunday. Never has. Yet it’s the race everyone wants to win. It’s always been like that. Even some of the best races that you’ve ever seen, zero overtakes.

“I don’t think you’re ever going to get it to be a great race. It’s never been, not saying it can never be, I’m just saying it never has been. Yet everyone still knows it as just the best race of the season.”

Lance Stroll

Following the 2024 race, the Aston Martin driver was blunt about his feelings, stating that the organisers “really need to do something with the track.” He also branded the Sunday races in Monaco as “horrendous.”

Alex Albon

During the 2024 race, Alex Albon spent 78 laps stuck behind Yuki Tsunoda’s deliberately slow-paced car. He voiced his annoyance over the radio and later explained that the extreme tyre management makes the race dangerously dull for the drivers.

“It’s actually hard to stay focused when you’re going that slowly because you’re just not even near anything. You’re not near any limits,” he complained.

George Russell

Despite cars this year being smaller, narrower, and lighter than in 2025, comments from Russell last year suggesting that the race should be cancelled altogether have resurfaced.

“For all the drivers, qualifying is the most exhilarating moment of the weekend,” Russell said. “Do we accept that? There should be no race, and it’s a qualifying race.”

Speaking in 2025, Russell said: “Monaco has always been the same. I think I have seen some of the proposed track changes that definitely will not make it worse. The small problem you have in Monaco is the one overtaking opportunity, which is out of the tunnel.

“The natural racing line is you’re going from the left, braking through the middle of the track and then you pull over to the right. So it’s very easy for a driver to position his car.

“But I honestly right now I don’t have the answer. Maybe the manual override would be a solution and you know you’ve to do all of this management through the race and if you’ve got a lot more power just to pass somebody in an unconventional space, it isn’t going to make the show worse.

“But part of me just thinks we need to accept Monaco for what it is. Formula 1 is better by having Monaco on the calendar. It is the most exhilarating qualifying of the season. And the race is always pretty boring, but it also makes us appreciate the other races as well.”

Charles Leclerc

Leclerc has been adamant that the increased number of cars will be an issue for drivers during qualifying at his home race.

The Monegasque said: “I think it’s a problem. I mean, 22 cars on such a short track I think will be quite tricky, especially because with these cars.

“I mean, a bit less now, still whenever you are like three, four seconds on tracks like this, you lose a bit of time. So it’s going to be tricky, but it’s the same for everybody and we’ll have to adapt to it. But it’s not ideal for Q1, I think.”

Oliver Bearman

Young British star Bearman labelled Monaco “boring”, stating that the real action takes place in the days leading up to the famous race.

“I think people just need to accept that the thrill of Monaco is on Saturday in qualifying,” he said last year. “It’s always going to be a boring race with a track of that size and unfortunately with the cars of this size, nothing’s going to happen.

“I think smaller cars will be better but I don’t think it’s going to fix everything because 20, 30 years ago it was the same scenario, not many overtakes. Quali is where the fun is in Monaco and I think that’s even more reason to qualify well, then you don’t get stuck in the train.”

Sky Sports, HBO Max, Netflix and Disney+ with Ultimate TV package

This article contains affiliate links, we will receive a commission on any sales we generate from it. Learn more

Sky has upgraded its Ultimate TV and Sky Sports bundle to now include HBO Max, Netflix, Disney+, discovery+ and Hayu, as well as 135 channels and full Sky coverage of the Premier League and EFL.

Sky broadcasts more than 1,400 live matches across the Premier League, EFL and more with at least 215 live from the top flight alongside Formula 1, darts and golf.

Deputy prime minister David Lammy has said he rang JD Vance to tell him he was “wrong” to claim an “invasion of migrants” in Europe is to blame for the murder of Henry Nowak.

The US vice-president said the 18-year-old, who was fatally stabbed by Vickrum Digwa, would still be alive if Europeans “stood their ground” against “politics of self-hatred”.

On Friday Downing Street hit out at outside actors “trying to interfere in our democracy” as it urged people to “respect the wishes” of Nowak’s family, who said they did not wish his death to be used to create division.

Bodycam footage from the night Nowak was killed by Digwa shows police handcuffed him as he lay on the ground, despite his repeated pleas that he could not breathe, after his killer falsely claimed he had been the victim of a racist attack. He died shortly after.

Mr Lammy told Sky News: “This has got nothing to do with mass migration. This young man (who killed Henry Nowak) was a Brit. Let’s be clear about that. And I said: “Look, Mr vice president, you’re wrong about this.”

He said that he spoke to the vice president on Saturday to “emphasise a number of things”.

They included that “our democratic process is working well”, he said, adding that the murderer had been convicted, there were ongoing investigations into the police and the attorney general was “looking at the sentencing in relation to this”.

He said he also told Mr Vance that “it’s also the case that actually murder is coming down in the United Kingdom.

“So, we had an agreeable conversation, but we disagree.”

Mr Lammy said Mr Vance “has a longstanding concern about what he calls Western values, he actually was at pains to say, both in the United States and in here in Europe, which he believes are under attack”.

He said that they “disagree on that” and that they ended the conversation “very amicably (and) talked about when we’re next going to see each other.”

But, Mr Lammy added: “I also urged him that it’s not helpful to tweet in this way, partly because of what the Nowak family have asked for and reminded him about their desire not to make this an issue of division and hatred, but to make this an issue of common sense.”

On Friday, Mr Vance tweeted, in what is the latest intervention by the Trump administration over the murder: “Henry Nowak died the same way a civilisation dies: abandoned, handcuffed by authorities who neither trusted nor cared for him, and accused of hate crimes he did not commit.

“His murder is as tragic as it is enraging.

“He should still be alive today, and he would be if the last few generations of European elites had stood their ground against the politics of self-hatred and the mass invasion of migrants, many of whom despise the West and the people who love it.”

This is a developing news story, more follows …

How do professional athletes manage to be friends while competing for the sport’s biggest prizes?

The current generation of tennis players seem to be closer than ever, with French Open finalists Alexander Zverev and Flavio Cobolli among those who are good mates.

But both men insist it will not be difficult to separate their personal friendship from their professional focus – which on Sunday will be winning a Grand Slam title for the first time.

Second seed Zverev and Italian 10th seed Cobolli will meet for a third time on clay this season, with Cobolli having won in Munich before Zverev beat him in Madrid at the next tournament.

The pair became friends when they were team-mates at the 2024 Laver Cup – where an Europe side takes on a World team – and have gone on to form what Zverev calls a “natural” bond.

After his Roland Garros semi-final, Zverev described how 24-year-old Cobolli regularly picks his brains about the sport.

Cobolli said they enjoy chatting about movies, while their fathers – who are also their coaches – are friendly.

“He’s a great player, a great guy,” said Zverev.

“I like him. I like his dad a lot. They are very good people. It’s his first final, so I’m happy for him that he reached it.”

Germany’s Zverev is the favourite to finally land the major title he has long been predicted to win – although the 29-year-old has lost his three previous Grand Slam finals, including the Roland Garros championship match two years ago.

“When you play a Grand Slam final, it’s not that difficult [to put friendship aside] because it means you reached the best stage in tennis,” Zverev said.

“You still try to beat each other and you still try to win, but that’s OK.”

Cobolli was due to play another friend in the semi-finals, but he received a walkover when compatriot Matteo Arnaldi withdrew because of a virus.

It means Cobolli has not played a competitive match since Wednesday.

“I will be ready but I also know that I will be fresh. Maybe [not playing] helped, maybe not. I will tell you after the final,” Cobolli said.

A group of over 30 parish councillors and organisations have grouped together to call on a council to look at its local plan

Locals have urged a council to “pause” its local plan as they fear the thousands of homes planned could lead to overdevelopment. Under Huntingdonshire’s District Council’s Draft Local Plan for 2026, more than 24,000 homes could be built in areas including Huntingdon and St Ives.

Locals including residents and parish councillors said they are concerned at the impact this could have on infrastructure including roads and doctors. As a result, over 30 parish councils and organisations have joined together in the ‘Pause the Plan’ campaign.

It asks HDC to thoroughly assess the impact it could have and to compile more evidence together before the plans are given the go-ahead.

Several concerned parish councillors and a local resident have shared their thoughts on the local plan. Chris Stening, of Ellington Parish Council, said the proposed number of new homes is essentially creating a “new town”.

He said: “When you put in a new town, you get all of the infrastructure considered. But what we’re seeing in this area is lots and lots of relatively small developments. But when you total them, it’s like creating three more St Ives all in this area.”

Chris believes there has been “no consideration” towards the impact it could have on water and road infrastructure. He added: “That’s the real problem with the plan. That’s why we’re asking the local authorities to collect some evidence and fill the gaps to understand what infrastructure requirements are needed and then actually come up with a property community impact assessment.”

Resident Ruth Southworth feels that St Ives could “lose its identity” if the homes are built. Ruth said: “In the local plan, there is no map of the cumulative effect.

“I don’t think they properly thought through the infrastructure. We have issues with flooding, we have issues with water and water supply. To have a development of this size in such a small area means you’ve also got to consider roads.

“Sometimes it can take an hour to just come out of St Ives. We have one river crossing in St Ives and one at Huntingdon. With the floods, that’s even more challenging.”

Like the rest of the group, Ruth would like to see the plan paused. Paul Boothman, chair of Houghton and Wyton Parish Council, said the group is “not against development”.

However, he added: “It’s really important we have it, especially affordable housing. This is an expensive place to live and not affordable. One of the other issues we have it we also need jobs. But, there seems to be an imbalance between the jobs that this will create and the housing numbers of the people that will actually be occupying those houses.

“The risk we’ve got, or the worry we’ve got, is that if we’re not careful in building such a concentrated development in such a small area, we’re gonna end up with housing for people who won’t actually have jobs here.

“There won’t be enough created and people will be commuting. That’s going to lead to even more gridlock and infrastructure issues that we already face, but it’s going to make the situation worse.”

Graham Campbell, from the Great Ouse Valley Trust, is concerned about the environmental impact of the developments. He said: “We live in one of the most attractive and important landscapes. It’s not recognised in the local plan and it’s what gives our whole area identity. That’s very important to us.

“Again, we’re not against development, that’s essential. But, the overall planning and concept [we want the council] to appreciate and reflect the value of this landscape for tourism, but also for local people to enjoy.”

A HDC spokesperson has said the council is currently progressing the local plan. The spokesperson said: “We are progressing the Local Plan in line with current government legislation, which requires submission of the Proposed Submission Plan to the Planning Inspectorate, alongside all public comments, by December 31, 2026.

“An independent Planning Inspector will then undertake a thorough examination of the draft plan and supporting evidence, including public hearings, to consider all representations and recommend any necessary changes.” The council is also aware of the Pause the Plan.