The 16-year-old was hit by a car in Co Down last year

A bench in memory of a 16-year-old girl who tragically lost her life in a road accident in the borough has been approved by Ards and North Down councillors.

Jaidyn Rice died after being struck by a car on the West Circular Road close to her home in Bangor last July. The PSNI is continuing to investigate the fatal collision and have recently revisited the scene as part of the ongoing probe.

Jamie McCartney, 30, was charged with causing death by dangerous driving, causing death whilst driving without a license and causing death whilst driving without insurance.

READ MORE: Controversial plan for housing estate beside Newtownards famous Duck Pond is approved

READ MORE: Troubled waters over proposal for new Strangford Lough bridge

Jaidyn’s family are honouring her legacy by raising awareness on victims of road traffic accidents, and are campaigning for improved road safety, including a review and change of speed limits and mandatory dash-cams.

A total of 56 lives were lost on Northern Ireland’s roads in 2025. Seven lives were lost on roads in Ards and North Down during 2025, the highest of any council area.

At the recent meeting of the Ards and North Down Borough Council Environment Committee, councillors unanimously agreed to work with the Rice family to create a bench honouring Jaidyn’s contribution to her community. The decision will go to the full meeting of the council later this month for ratification, wher it is expected to pass.

The agreed motion, by Ards and North Down Lord Mayor, Alliance Councillor Gillian McCollum, and seconded by UUP Councillor Pete Wray, says the bench will be “a place of reflection, connection and outreach.” The motion states the bench will be in an agreed location and will incorporate council’s “Here to Help” app, which signposts vital support services around the borough.

It states: “This council notes the profound impact on the Clandeboye Community of the tragic death of 16 year old DICE leader and Army Cadet Jaidyn Rice on the 8th July 2025 and further notes the terrible loss of the other lives on roads in our Borough during 2025.”

The Lord Mayor said at the committee meeting: “With her passing, the community lost not only a young life, but a role model and a leader, and a shining source of light for so many young people in that area. At just 16 Jaidyn had already made an extraordinary impact, she had forged a reputation locally as a dynamic youth leader with the DICE project, where her empathy, leadership and natural compassion stood out.”

She added: “The Rice family have engaged with me and with council officers in the hope of creating something lasting, that would honour her commitment to safety, to wellbeing and connection, but which would also serve the community in a very practical way.

“Their vision is to create a bench in an agreed and appropriate location which will serve as a place that is recognised as one of reflection, connection and support. It is not about providing somewhere simply to sit, it is about creating a space where people can pause and can reflect, and crucially, where they can access help.”

She said: “This bench would have a QR code which would link directly to the council Here to Help app, a simple but very powerful bridge between a physical space and digital support. It provides very fast, accessible signposting to a huge range of servicing across this borough.

“It covers issues such as mental health, addiction, domestic abuse, and housing. It also contains an emergency “need help now” pathway for those who need urgent intervention, directing them to services such as the Samaritans, as well as a wider network of community and voluntary organisations for longer term support.”

She said: “The proposal is not for a memorial bench in the customary sense, the council does have a prescribed policy for memorial benches. The Rice family is not seeking to bypass or to undermine that policy, because this proposal is something very different in nature and purpose.

“Jaidyn’s bench is not intended to be a static memorial, it is intended to be a living symbol of connection, safety and hope. A place of refuge, and a place that reflects the way she lived her life, which was outward looking and compassionate, and always focused on helping others.”

For all the latest news, visit the Belfast Live homepage here and sign up to our daily newsletter here.

The source said: “We fully understand and appreciate the survivors’ position, but can only reiterate that our position is clear that anything that could potentially impact on ongoing police inquiries and assessments, and any potential legal action that could result from that, would be to the detriment of the survivors themselves in their pursuit of justice.”

A US-sanctioned tanker with links to China, the Rich Starry, has transited the Strait of Hormuz, despite the US blockade of the waterway. According to the respected maritime news and intelligence agency Lloydslist, the Rich Starry is falsely registered in Malawi, but is Chinese owned and carrying a Chinese crew. It is subject to US sanctions for carrying Iranian goods. It is not known what the vessel is currently transporting.

Having been anchored off the UAE, the Rich Starry is not technically in breach of the blockade, but the incident has raised fears of a potential confrontation between the US and China in the region. Other vessels are reported to be waiting to transit the Strait, despite the US blockade.

The decision to impose a blockade on Iranian ports in the vicinity of the Strait was announced by the US president, Donald Trump, following the breakdown of US-Iran peace talks in Islamabad on April 11. Trump’s announcement was clarified by a statement on April 12 from US Central Command, which stipulated that the operation would prevent ships entering and exiting Iranian ports and coastal areas while not impeding vessels transiting the Strait to and from non‑Iranian ports.

Trump also announced that: “I have also instructed our Navy to seek and interdict every vessel in International Waters that has paid a toll to Iran. No one who pays an illegal toll will have safe passage on the high seas.” It remains unclear as to whether this will be implemented.

The Strait of Hormuz has been as good as closed since shortly after the US and Israel launched their attacks on Iran at the end of February. Most ship owners, charterers and insurers are unwilling to accept the financial risk – and risk to human life – that transiting the Strait under threat of Iranian attack would entail.

Blockades are used to convert naval dominance into advantage on land by preventing imports and exports of goods, in Iran’s case oil, to put pressure on an adversary’s population and government by hurting their economy. Likewise, Iran’s strategy of closing down the Strait after it was attacked intended to disrupt the global economy in order to put international pressure on the Trump administration.

Iran has long threatened to use its geographical proximity to the Strait of Hormuz to close it down. Having demonstrated how effective this can be in disrupting oil and liquid natural gas prices, Tehran has been flexing its muscles by demanding that ships wanting to transit the waterway pay a tariff of up to US$2 million (£1.5 million). Lloydslist reported on March 25 that “a total of 26 vessel transits through the strait have followed a route pre-approved under an IRGC [Islamic Republican Guard Corps] ‘toll booth’ system that requires the ship operators to submit to a vetting scheme”.

This was reportedly a sticking point in negotiations between the US and Iran in Pakistan on April 11. Tehran wants to retain control of the Strait and the ability to levy tolls from transiting ships. The US is demanding that the maritime right of free passage must be enforced. It was when the first round of talks ended in deadlock that the US president decided to impose the naval blockade.

Former US diplomat to the Middle East, David Satterfield, told the BBC on April 13 that it was now about which country could absorb more pain, adding: “The Iranians believe … that they can absorb more pain for a longer period than their opponents can.”

Expensive – and risky – gambit

The cost calculus is asymmetric. It will be more expensive for the US to maintain its blockade than it was for Iran to close the Strait. The question will be whether Washington can sustain interdiction long enough to effectively undermine the regime – always remembering that the Islamic Republic has potentially had decades to prepare for this sort of scenario.

If the blockade can be implemented effectively, it could – in time – have an effect on an economy wrecked by years of sanctions and further weakened by the recent war and nationwide protests in January. The question is how long that might take.

To be effective, the blockade will require considerable naval resources. The US is reported to have as many as 21 warships in the Middle East, including the aircraft carrier USS Abraham Lincoln and the USS Tripoli, an amphibious assault ship with a complement of marines who are trained to board ships using helicopters and small boarding craft.

This introduces another layer of risk as assets operating near to the Iranian coasts will need to be protected against Iranian missiles, drones and fast attack craft. So, this would be resource‑intensive, operationally demanding and thus politically exposed for the US.

How the US will go about enforcement remains to be seen. In December and January, US naval and coastguard ships boarded and seized several vessels linked to Venezuela’s shadow fleet that had broken America’s blockade. Whether it would pursue the same action with a vessel linked to China is another matter though. And while another option would be to fire warning shots, these can be dangerous around tankers because of the risk of oil spillage, as well as the obvious political risk attached to Chinese-linked vessels.

It’s not clear at present that imposing a blockade on the Strait of Hormuz will restore free navigation of the waterway any time soon. But it now appears that, in the absence of free navigation, some countries have decided to call America’s bluff and attempt to transit the waterway in defiance of the US blockade. And the big concern must be the serious risk of escalation if the US attempts to enforce the blockade on a Chinese-owned vessel.

None of this will be welcomed by the US president and his national security team.

“The motion is excellent, but we have to hold the British Government’s feet to the fire as much as possible.”

A heated row over letting the British government “off the hook” on increasing household oil payments has flared in a Co Down chamber amid an Irish unity call.

Newry, Mourne and Down District Counci this week agreed a Sinn Fein motion on a majority vote to urge the release of £17m UK funding from the Department for Communities ahead of a heating oil paper to the Executive on Thursday.

However, unionist support for the motion was “lost” over a constitutional matter.

READ MORE: Lisburn HGV transport depot approved amid Middle East fuel crisis concerns.

READ MORE: Lisburn councillor cleared after Palestine ‘cheerleaders for head choppers’ post.

Bringing forward the motion, Deputy chairperson Geraldine Kearns said: “This council recognises the immense pressure being placed on workers, families and businesses as a result of huge price hikes on energy costs, especially home heating oil as a result of the US-Israeli war on Iran.

“Newry, Mourne and Down,calls on the Communities Minister who has the responsibility for tackling fuel poverty to set up a scheme to get this money (£17m) into the pockets of those who are struggling with heating costs.”

She added:”This council further calls on the British government to end its inadequate and delayed response to the fuel crisis, and to act with the urgency that it demands to protect households, sustain local businesses, and safeguard our rural economy.

“And to write to the British Secretary of State for the North and the Minister of State for Energy to clearly convey this council’s deep frustration at their failure to act, and to demand the immediate delivery of real, effective support for those struggling with rising energy crisis.”

Slieve Gullion Sinn Fein councillor Aine Quinn who seconded the motion added:”This exposes something that we already know, partition does not work…this is why the case for Irish unity has never been more relevant not as an abstract idea, but as a common sense solution.”

The huge hike in heating costs from the Middle East conflict is now said to be impacting the budgets of 500,000 homes in NI.

The UK Government has stepped in with an offer of £17 million in support to NI, which economists calculated as £35 per household. The money is due to be delivered by the DfC.

Mournes DUP councillor Glyn Hanna said:”Gordon Lyons (DfC Minister) has demonstrated previously that he will step in and deliver support when it falls within his remit including administrating a winter fuel payment, he stands ready to do so again.

“The DUP position is clear funding must be increased by a meaningful level, delivery mechanisms must be urgently put in place and both the Executive and the UK Government must act in a coordinated way to provide real relief.”

A further amendment by Downpatrick SDLP councillor Conor Galbraith saying:”Last month we witnessed an 80% rise in heating oil in just one week.

“The SDLP supports the motion, but also recognise a huge gap in it as it stands.

“The motion focuses primarily on the Communities Minister, but an energy crisis of this scale cannot be addressed by one department alone.

“We propose to write to the First and Deputy First Minister, the Executive and the UK Government to urgently establish a joint energy task force…to roll out practical steps that reflect the reality that people are facing.”

The amendment was not accepted by Sinn Fein with a majority voting against the proposal (11 for, 20 against and 6 abstaining).

SDLP Slieve Gullion councillor Pete Byrne said:”We want more money from the British Government.

“So, if we’re not taking the amendment, don’t try and blame it on the British Government getting off the hook, this sticks them on a hook.

“The motion is excellent, but we have to hold the British Government’s feet to the fire as much as possible.”

Slieve Gullion UUP councillor David Taylor added:”It has been reported that the Communities Minister is due to bring a paper to the Executive this Thursday, which will hopefully bring some welcome news.

“This issue effects everyone in the community irrespective of political background.

“I want to express my disappointment that in seconding the motion, Councillor Quinn really took that cross community support aspect away by making a political point on constitutional position of Northern Ireland, there was no need for that.

“And what you have done is actually lost support from the unionist side.”

The Sinn Fein motion was then approved with unionists voting against (31 for and 6 against).

For all the latest news, visit the Belfast Live homepage here and sign up to our daily newsletter here.

The debate came as fuel protests took place across Northern Ireland

DUP deputy leader Michelle McIlveen has hit out at other MLAs after they opposed a motion from the party calling for a full cost-benefit analysis of net zero policies in all of Stormont’s departments.

The motion expressed “deep concern” that aspirational climate targets are impeding the delivery of high-quality public services and infrastructure across Northern Ireland after the High Court quashed the A5 Western Transport Corridor due to it conflicting with the yet-to-be-finalised Climate Action Plan. This has had major implications for other infrastructure projects, including the A4 Enniskillen bypass.

Among other concerns raised by the party were the current legal requirement for minimum spend on active travel which thet said “perversely acts as a barrier to vital investment in roads maintenance and repairs” and also aspects of the draft Climate Action Plan which they added “contains a range of proposals that are not quantified and would place additional burdens on farmers and households during a cost-of-living crisis.”

Speaking following the debate, Ms McIlveen said: “Today the Assembly had an opportunity to take a sensible and responsible step to calculate the cost of net zero for our budget. Instead of looking at affordability or grasping transparency, every other major party chose to turn a blind eye to the real costs being imposed on households, businesses and public services.

“Our motion simply asked that departments properly assess the costs and benefits of net zero policies. That is the minimum standard of good government, yet it was rejected.“The reality is that many of the proposals being advanced under the current Climate Action Plan are not fully quantified. Families and businesses are being asked to shoulder additional burdens without clarity on what those costs will be or what the return will be.“At a time when people are already facing a cost-of-living crisis, that is simply unacceptable.“We have already seen how rigid climate targets are impacting major infrastructure projects, including the A5 and A1. There is a growing risk that vital investment in roads and economic development will be delayed or deprioritised because of policies that have not been properly stress-tested.“Other parties may be content to pursue aspirational targets without asking hard questions, but the DUP will not. We will continue to stand up for a fair and balanced approach. One that protects our environment while also safeguarding public services and household finances.“The refusal of others to even examine the cost of their policies raises serious questions about whether their approach is driven by evidence or ideology.”

For all the latest news, visit the Belfast Live homepage here and sign up to our daily newsletter here.

NFL reporter Dianna Russini has resigned from The Athletic less than a week after published photos of her and New England Patriots coach Mike Vrabel at an Arizona resort prompted an internal investigation at The New York Times-owned sports outlet.

The New York Post last week published the photos of Vrabel and Russini at the Sedona hotel and said they were taken before the NFL owners meetings that began in Phoenix on March 29.

Vrabel didn’t attend New England’s pre-draft news conference on Monday.

The New York Times reported Saturday that the digital outlet was investigating Russini’s conduct.

That decision came after Ginsberg previously told the Post that the photos “lacked essential context” and lauded her work with The Athletic.

Vrabel, who won three Super Bowls as a player with New England, is preparing for his second season as coach of the Patriots. He was the AP NFL Coach of the Year after leading the team to a 14-3 finish last season, which ended with a Super Bowl loss to Seattle. Vrabel previously won the AP NFL Coach of the Year award with Tennessee in 2021.

___

AP NFL: https://apnews.com/NFL

Dr Ann Burgess is at the heart of BBC Two’s true crime docu-series Mastermind: To Think Like A Killer.

Advertisement

Dr Ann Burgess worked on cases involving some of America’s most notorious serial killers, including Ted Bundy, Ed Kemper, and Dennis Rader.BBC Two is broadcasting the first episode of Mastermind: To Think Like A Killer tonight, Tuesday, April 14, a three-part documentary series examining the life of Dr Ann Burgess.

Having initially trained as a psychiatric mental health nurse, Burgess became one of the FBI’s most valuable assets as she transformed criminal profiling, aiding in the capture of killers throughout the 1970s and 1980s, with her contributions remaining vital to this day.So much so that she helped inspire Netflix‘s hugely popular crime thriller Mindhunter, with psychologist Dr Wendy Carr from the FBI’s Behaviour Science Unit (BSU) being modelled on Burgess.

Where is Dr Ann Burgess now?

Dr Ann Burgess may be 89-years-old, but she shows no signs of slowing down as she continues to work on profiling.Rather than focusing on serial killers, however, Burgess has turned her attention to profiling school shooters, collaborating alongside her granddaughter Alex, according to CBS.

Together, they gather data based on what school shooters have written in their manifestos, hoping to develop a profiling technique to assist teachers and others in identifying students who may be displaying worrying signs.Burgess told CBS that the motivation “always includes a grievance”, as she continued: “And then they start researching and developing their plan.

“Law enforcement is onto this, and I think that they are making great strides on the cases that don’t turn out to be lethal.”This isn’t the only area in which Burgess operates, as she also trains nurses in Boston to identify signs that women with dementia have been sexually assaulted in care homes.

Very little is known about her private life, as Burgess prefers to remain out of the public eye.

Her husband, Allen, was a computer engineer and a staunch supporter of her work with the FBI.

As a qualified pilot, Allen was able to fly her to and from Quantico, Virginia, enabling her to conduct her research before Burgess obtained her own licence.

Together, they have four children, two sons and two daughters, and she is currently collaborating closely with her granddaughter Alex on her latest project.

Mastermind: To Think Like A Killer is available to watch on BBC Two and BBC iPlayer.

More than 13 million people of State Pension age can defer claiming to boost payments or stop paying National Insurance contributions if still working

Advertisement

More than 13 million people across Great Britain have reached State Pension age and are receiving weekly payments of up to £241.30. Those who have reached the official retirement age, which is currently undergoing a phased increase from 66 to 67 between now and 2028, have the option to stop working and claim their State Pension, defer their claim, or continue working while claiming it.

If you are considering claiming your pension while remaining in employment, it is worth bearing in mind that the Personal Allowance is frozen at £12,570 until April 2031, and any earnings above this threshold will be subject to taxation. While deferring your claim can increase annual State Pension payments by nearly £700, many older workers may be unaware that upon reaching State Pension age, they are no longer required to pay National Insurance Contributions (NICs) through their wages.

However, this financial benefit does not take effect automatically and must be brought to your employer’s attention, though assistance is also available through HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC). If you are an employee who has already reached State Pension age and is still paying NICs, you are entitled to reclaim that money. Guidance published on GOV.UK outlines the full process for removing NICs from your pay, whether you are employed or self-employed, reports the Daily Record.

It states: “If you’re self-employed, your Class 2 National Insurance contributions will no longer be treated as paid. You stop paying Class 4 National Insurance from 6 April (start of the tax year) after you reach State Pension age. You only pay Income Tax if your taxable income – including your private pension and State Pension – is more than your tax-free allowances (the amount of income you’re allowed before you pay tax).”

According to official guidance, if you carry on working past retirement age, you must provide your employer with proof of your age to ensure you cease paying National Insurance. This can be done using a birth certificate or passport. Should you prefer not to show your employer either document, HMRC is able to issue a letter to present to them instead.

The letter will confirm that you have reached State Pension age and that you do not need to pay National Insurance. It is worth noting that you will need to write to HMRC explaining your reasons for not wishing your employer to see your birth certificate or passport.

If HMRC does not hold a record of your date of birth, they will request that you submit your birth certificate or passport for verification. Certified copies are acceptable.

ANN ARBOR, Mich. (AP) — Former Michigan football coach Sherrone Moore was placed on probation Tuesday for 18 months for a confrontation with his executive assistant soon after he was fired for having an inappropriate relationship with her.

Moore was facing a possible sentence of up to six months in jail after pleading no contest to trespassing and malicious use of a telecom device. But Judge J. Cedric Simpson ordered no time in custody.

He said jail wasn’t warranted, though he warned Moore that “all bets are off” if he violates probation.

Moore, 40, was fired on Dec. 10 after leading the Wolverines for two seasons, following Jim Harbaugh’s move to the NFL’s Los Angeles Chargers. It was a stunning dismissal at one of college football’s most prestigious programs.

Moore was accused that same day of confronting Paige Shiver, with whom he had been having an affair, and blaming her for his firing, even threatening to kill himself with butter knives and kitchen scissors in her apartment. Authorities said she had ended the affair and spoken to school officials about it.

By ordering probation, “I would let Ms. Shiver know that this court is not by any means lessening the impact of those events,” the judge said.

“Frankly, Mr. Moore, you had no right to do what you did,” he added. “I know that she was placed in fear. It was a traumatic experience that day for you. It was certainly a traumatic experience for her. But you had no right to spread your pain to her.”

Shiver did not attend the hearing but released a statement, saying the sentence “does not reflect the harm done to me.”

“He broke into my apartment, crying, yelling, enraged, and came at me with knives. I was threatened, and I feared for my life,” she said.

Moore was initially charged with felony home invasion, stalking and illegal entry. But Washtenaw County prosecutors agreed to a deal in which he pleaded no contest to two other misdemeanors.

Moore spoke briefly in court. He thanked his wife, Kelli, for standing by him but did not say anything about Shiver.

The judge, too, praised Kelli Moore. Simpson said he was especially moved by a letter she wrote in support of her husband. He also noted that she was concerned about Moore’s mental health when she calmly called police on the day of the incident in search of him.

“The person, quite frankly Mr. Moore, that is saving you from the full wrath of this court is the one you betrayed,” Simpson said. “I don’t know where your wife Kelli finds her strength.”

The judge also cited the “courage” of prosecutors “in doing what is right” by backing off from the initial charges.

“When the charges were filed they were appropriate,” Simpson said. “But as with any case, as more facts become known and as more things happen, the facts and the analysis change.”

The plea deal came after defense lawyer Ellen Michaels planned to aggressively challenge how police gathered and shared information to get an arrest warrant. She argued that police didn’t disclose that Moore and Shiver had a working relationship.

Moore did not harm himself and was peacefully arrested in a parking lot away from Shiver’s apartment.

After the hearing, outside the courthouse, Moore held a Bible in one hand and his wife’s hand with the other.

“Sherrone is grateful for this matter to be resolved and he and his wife, Kelli, are ready to move forward with their family and focus on the next chapter,” Michaels said.

___

White reported from Detroit.

___

EDITOR’S NOTE — This story includes discussion of suicide. If you or someone you know needs help, the national suicide and crisis lifeline in the U.S. is available by calling or texting 988. There is also an online chat at 988lifeline.org