One ITV campmate has claimed that not all of the former footballer and actor’s arguement was shown

I’m A Celebrity South Africa star Jimmy Bullard has confirmed whether he will be at the final of the ITV reality show amid fresh claims from one of his campmates about his ‘feud’ with Adam Thomas.

Former footballer Jimmy left fans of the series divided on Tuesday night (April 21) as the campmates fought for their place in camp. Moments after Coronation Street icon Beverley Callard had to leave on medical grounds, the rest of the campmates were placed into pairs.

This led to an explosive row between former Emmerdale actor Adam, who has already issued a statement about boxer David Haye’s treatment of him, and Jimmy, with the latter deciding to quit the show and put Adam’s place in the competition at risk.

Click here to get the biggest stories straight to your inbox in our Daily Newsletter

The former Fulham player was seen watching the Bushtucker trail before he told his team: “Boys, I don’t think I’ve got it in me.” Jimmy then apologised to Adam and said ‘I’m A Celebrity… Get Me Out Of Here’, which caused the trial to end for everyone and meant that contestants must forfeit the stars they had won.

Adam then stormed over to Jimmy during a heated exchange and said: “Taking the f****** piss, are you taking the f****** piss?” He added: “I’m in there getting covered in f****** ants!” Jimmy responded by telling him to “calm down” and described his outburst as “pathetic”.

Due to Jimmy not attempting the challenge, Ant and Dec asked the campmates if they wanted to keep Adam in, who unanimously voted for the actor to remain on the show. When hearing that his campmates had voted to keep him in, Adam burst into tears, and said: “I appreciate that, guys. Thank you and I’m so sorry for the way that I acted as well, it was just emotions are really running high.”

Reports have since emerged that Jimmy would not be attending the final due to the dramatic scenes. Filmed last year, the live final is set to air on Friday night (April 22). Broadcast from London, the former campmates are set to be in attendance to see who follows in Myleene Klass’ footsteps and is crowned the latest I’m A Celebrity ‘Legend’.

With the fallout of the incident making headlines, singer Sinitta took to Instagram on Wednesday (April 22). According to the singer, who is also taking part in the series, the C-word was shouted during the argument.

Sinitta said: “There was a big argument, I can hear c-word, c-word, shouting c-word, you c-word. What on earth is going on? And I’m also thinking – can we get on with the race because I’m winning?

“I’m literally frozen in position like ready to carry on from where we’ve left off, but no. And it’s this massive fight and, of course, it was one of these things that if whoever lost the game, the team were off the show so Adam and Jimmy are going and I suddenly think, wait a minute this isn’t fair.”

Taking to the comments section of Sinitta’s post, former Soccer AM host Jimmy not only claimed that the full argument was not shown, but that he will be attending the final after all.

“Wow thanks @thesinittaofficial shame that wasn’t shown! My version will be told Friday! Can’t wait to see you all….well some of yous,” he wrote.

It took place at a house in Marbled White Place, Knaresborough, after a man refused to leave or allow a woman to leave the property.

Recommended reading:

North Yorkshire Police said they were called to the scene just after 8am this morning and its officers raised a cordon.

In a statement just after 3pm, a force spokesperson said: “Following negotiations the man, who is in his 40s, has been arrested on suspicion of false imprisonment and has been taken to hospital for treatment, where he remains under close police supervision.

“Officers are emphasising that the incident has now concluded and is being treated as isolated.

“There has been a police presence in the area to deal with the incident and neighbourhood policing team officers will be on patrol to provide continued support to the local community this evening.”

Bolton police have confirmed there is no wider threat to the community, and that this is being treated as an isolated incident.

Two men were treated for stab wounds after emergency services were called to Tonge Moor Road in Bolton at around 10.30am.

A man in his 50s was arrested on suspicion of assault and remains in custody for questioning.

The Bolton News understands that the man was was taken to hospital for an assessment and is now in custody as investigations continue.

Detective Chief Inspector Mike Sharples said: “We currently have a man detained and officers are conducting extensive enquiries as part of a comprehensive investigation.

“We fully appreciate that the local community will be concerned but I would like to reassure them that there is no wider threat, and that this is being treated as an isolated incident.”

He acknowledged the circulation of a video related to the incident and the concerns it may raise.

Police standing at a door on the row of houses. (Image: NQ)

DCI Sharples said: “We are aware of a video circulating online in relation to this incident, and we appreciate that people will have concerns and worries regarding it.

“You will notice we have extra patrols in the area; I encourage anyone with concerns to please speak with our officers who are there to support.

“If you are concerned about crime in your area, you can report it to police on 101 or via our LiveChat service at gmp.police.uk.

“Alternatively, you can contact the independent charity Crimestoppers, anonymously, on 0800 555 111.”

Enquiries remain ongoing.

Whether through TV crime dramas or cinema blockbusters about dinosaur theme parks, DNA is a staple of modern popular culture – its double-helix structure one of science’s most iconic visualisations.

Yet remarkably, the young Swiss scientist who discovered DNA in the first place is largely forgotten.

Born in Basel in 1844, Friedrich Miescher only began his career as a researcher after developing a hearing impairment that forced him to shelve plans to be a doctor like his father. Working in the medieval castle that overlooks the old German town of Tübingen, Miescher’s aim was a grand one – to uncover the chemical nature of life itself.

But his working environment was rather different to today’s molecular biology laboratories. The University of Tübingen’s conversion of the castle kitchens into laboratories appears to have involved little more than swapping pots and pans for beakers and alembics used for distillation.

Working in what he likened to the laboratory of a medieval alchemist, the first stage of Miescher’s research was the unsavoury task of scraping pus from discarded surgical bandages, obtained from the local hospital.

Pus offered him a rich source of white blood cells, which were much easier to isolate and prepare than cells from solid human tissue. So, they were particularly well suited for analysing what molecules human cells are made of.

Over the winter of 1868-9, Miescher discovered a novel cellular substance with properties unlike anything else known at that time. Its chemical behaviour was significantly different to proteins, which were by then understood to be key structural and functional components of cells.

Unlike proteins, Miescher’s substance was rich in the element phosphorus. Observing that it was found almost exclusively within each cell’s nucleus, he called it “nuclein” – a term that was largely retained within its modern name of deoxyribonucleic acid, or DNA.

Little was known about the functions of the cell’s nucleus at the time, although several biologists suspected it to be central to cell growth and division. Miescher was convinced that nuclein must be closely involved in these processes.

He announced the discovery of DNA in 1871 in a paper titled On the Chemical Composition of Pus Cells. While it hardly sounded (or indeed read) like a page-turner, his studies of pus would prove a landmark moment in the history of science.

Nearly a century later, it led to the Nobel-winning discovery of DNA’s double-helix structure. The date of that landmark paper by James Watson and Francis Crick is now marked each year on April 25 as DNA Day. Yet Miescher’s contribution is largely unacknowledged.

From pus to salmon

The Swiss scientist’s move back to his home town in 1871 brought him a rich new source of nuclein that meant no longer having to scrape pus from old bandages.

Each year, salmon swim from the North Sea to their breeding grounds in the upper Rhine river, where the city of Basel is located. In preparation for mating, the male salmon’s testes grow massively and become laden with DNA.

Rising in the dark and cold of a winter morning, Miescher would walk down to the banks of the Rhine to catch salmon, then extract their DNA in his laboratory. This image gave us the title of our biography of Miescher, The Dawn Fisherman, to be published in June 2026.

This series is dedicated to lesser-known, highly influential scientists who have had a powerful influence on the careers and research paths of many others, including the authors of these articles.

The intensity with which Miescher carried out his research was formidable. One of his students recalled that, on the day of Miescher’s wedding, friends had to drag him from his lab bench to attend the church.

His commitments grew. As well as researching Rhine salmon for the local fishing industry, Miescher worked for the Swiss government to improve the diets of prison inmates. And after founding Basel’s first institute of anatomy and physiology in 1885, there were the growing administrative burdens of being its director.

All these commitments brought a growing sense of frustration that he was spending less time on DNA. Looking to classical mythology for images of futility and despair, Miescher compared himself to rolling the boulder of Sisyphus up the mountain.

These strains took their toll on his health. In 1890, having contracted tuberculosis, he became a resident at a sanatorium in the alpine resort of Davos.

A second great insight

But during the final years of his life there, Miescher had his second great insight. Citing Charles Darwin’s speculations about the mechanism of heredity, Miescher proposed that the variation in biological traits of all living organisms might arise through variation in the physical structure of a large molecule – which he thought was most likely to be a protein.

Limited by the concepts and methods of his time, Miescher did not make the connection that nuclein (DNA) was, in fact, this very molecule.

He died in 1895 aged 51, burdened by a painful sense of failure and opportunities missed. “I will never know the happiness that belongs to the man who has lived up to their station in a harmonious way to the satisfaction of themselves and others,” Miescher wrote.

But his former mentor, the distinguished physiologist Carl Ludwig (1816-1895), was more confident that the achievements of his protégé would one day be recognised. “However often the cell will be studied and examined during the centuries to come,” he assured Miescher as he lay in the Davos sanatorium, “the grateful descendants will remember you as the ground-breaking researcher”.

Ludwig’s prediction turned out to be only partly accurate. DNA-based technologies have transformed what we understand about life and disease. Yet Miescher is scarcely acknowledged as the scientist whose pioneering work led to them.

This article features references to a book that have been included for editorial reasons, and contain links to bookshop.org. If you click on one of the links and go on to buy something from bookshop.org The Conversation UK may earn a commission.

Dr Todd’s lurking gave her some juicy information

Emmerdale revealed a major twist with Dr Caitlin Todd after Charity Dingle survived her horror birth as surrogate for Jacob and Sarah Sugden.

Charity Dingle was left with another lie to spin after she was confronted by Dr Caitlin Todd moments after her traumatic birth scenes aired.

While it was only ever a matter of time that someone else learned the truth about baby Leyla, viewers will know that Dr Todd takes no messing when it comes to having control over a situation.

Click here to get the biggest stories straight to your inbox in our Daily Newsletter

Arriving at the hospital, the three of them entered the lift up to the maternity ward but it broke down, meaning they were all completely stuck.

As Mack panicked due to his PTSD from being held hostage in John Sugden’s underground bunker, it was up to Ross Barton to pull through and help deliver the baby.

Once baby Leyla arrived, Mack and Ross panicked as they noticed Charity had become unresponsive and was bleeding. After the doors managed to be prised open by the firefighters, Dr Todd was quick on the scene getting Charity straight to surgery after handing Leyla over to Ross.

However, on Wednesday (April 22) night, things became worse for Charity. After Chas confronted Ross for hanging around the hospital, Dr Todd spotted their intense conversation and instantly became intrigued.

Later, she noticed Leyla’s blood type did not match Jacob’s in the medical files, and armed with new information she made her way over to Charity.

While Charity tried to convince Todd that it was a mistake and that Leyla is Jacob and Sarah’s baby, a familiar gleam appeared in her eyes as she responded with a quick comment for Charity to “keep those stress levels down” after Mack disturbed their discreet conversation.

Viewers will know that Jacob has been the subject of bullying since Dr Todd became his mentor. She even went as far as to mention Maya Stepney, his groomer.

Enough was enough for the trainee doctor, and he decided to place a formal complaint with HR. Telling Todd that he’d done just that, now she has Charity’s secret what will she do next?

On a Reddit thread, viewers expressed their shock over the new twist. u/ok_project4522 wrote: “I did not expect that twist with Dr Todd! The reveal must not be long now.”

u/typicalbobcot1088 added: “Dr Todd is annoyingly brilliant to me. I love how she just switches” as u/ryanhanks25 asked: “Is Todd planning on blackmailing Charity to get Jacob to withdraw his complaint?”

Emmerdale airs on weeknights at 8pm on ITV1 and is available to stream on ITVX.

Geo-Structural Ltd has lodged a planning application seeking approval for 940-square metre building which would store plant and equipment at Drumbreck Farm.

North Lanarkshire Council has been asked by a construction company to grant planning permission for a storage building at its base in Caldercruix.

Geo-Structural Ltd, which specialises in the maintenance and preservation of bridges and viaducts, has lodged a planning application seeking approval for 940-square metre building which would store plant and equipment at Drumbreck Farm.

The new building would be located in an area of currently unused land and the proposals do not include the creation of new parking facilities.

The company’s website states that it has worked on several well-known structures including the Forth Rail Bridge, Clyde Viaduct and numerous wind farms.

For further information on the application, or to leave comment for consideration, visit North Lanarkshire Council’s website and search for planning reference 26/00352/FUL.

READ MORE: Football fundraiser involving ex-school pupils in aid of St Andrew’s Hospice being held at home of Albion Rovers FC

*Don’t miss the latest headlines from around Lanarkshire. Sign up to our newsletters here.

And did you know Lanarkshire Live had its own app? Download yours for free here.

Strictly Come Dancing’s double act Claudia Winkleman and Tess Daly could be back on the BBC ballroom floor just a year after exiting as hosts.

It will surprise everyone, after the pair sensationally announced that last series would be their final one, in the middle of the autumn run. 

They bid a tearful farewell to the BBC viewership at the end of Strictly’s Christmas Day special, leading the room in one last call of the show’s catchphrase: “Keeeep dancing!”

Since then, a string of the top presenting names in the biz have been pitched as potential replacements, with no official announcement as of yet. 

But new odds from the bookmakers over at William Hill suggest that there’s a possibility Winkleman and Daly could be back yet, albeit in a different capacity.

It’s currently 16/1 for either Claudia Winkleman or Tess Daly to return to Strictly as contestants.

So they would be partnered up with one of the show’s professional dancers and trained in all the moves they’ve been watching from the sidelines.

Lee Phelps said on behalf of William Hill: ‘Claudia and Tess have been loyal servants to Strictly Come Dancing over the last twenty years, so it wouldn’t surprise anyone if they made a comeback to the ballroom in some capacity.

‘The pair are 16/1 with us for either to compete in this year’s series, so we’re certainly not ruling anything else for the ex-hosts.

Advertisement

‘As for who steps into the hosting role this year, Emma Willis, Bradley Walsh, and Rylan Clark are the latest frontrunners, but expect some further twists ahead of this autumn’s latest edition.’

Who are the favourites to host Strictly next?

These are the latest odds according to William Hill…

In the race to host, Emma Willis, Bradley Walsh, and Rylan Clark have developed a three-way race to be awarded the role at 5/4, with Zoe Ball (9/4) close behind.

Elsewhere, La Voix completes the list of leading contenders at 3/1, with Alex Jones and Alison Hammond each 5/1.

Advertisement

We’re said to be down to the final nine in the quest to replace Daly and Winkleman, with chemistry tests in the diary for this week to determine who will follow in their footsteps.

The auditions will reportedly mimic a Strictly show, with judges and even a live band, to see who has what it takes to cope with the pressures of live television. 

A source told The Sun that the presenters in contention have signed non-disclosure agreements to keep all the details about the auditions top secret. 

Advertisement

Given the prestige of the ballroom dancing show for the BBC, they’ve reportedly got the broadcaster’s top bosses overseeing proceedings, including incoming director general Matt Brittin.

Metro contacted Tess Daly and Claudia Winkleman’s representatives for comment.

Got a story?

If you’ve got a celebrity story, video or pictures get in touch with the Metro.co.uk entertainment team by emailing us celebtips@metro.co.uk, calling 020 3615 2145 or by visiting our Submit Stuff page – we’d love to hear from you.

Advertisement

MORE: Jamie Bell gives ‘career-best’ performance in BBC drama 26 years after Billy Elliot

MORE: One of the BBC’s most addictive shows is back — but not enough people are watching

MORE: Stunning BBC drama that’s ‘modern-day Scottish Romeo and Juliet’ storms top 10

Comments


Add as preferred source

TV Newsletter

Sign up and tell us which TV shows you love to watch to get personalised updates every morning.

Advertisement

She said: “There is hope still, we pray. My dear family and friends. I’m asking from the deepest place in my heart – please keep my beautiful daughter Klaudia in your prayers right now. She is my angel, my world, my everything, and she needs all the love, strength, and healing we can send her.

The parliamentary stalemate over the Government’s pension reforms continues, after MPs voted to press the Lords to accept new laws on the Government’s ability to direct pension investments.

The House of Commons backed an amendment by 272 votes to 149, majority 123 to send the Pensions Scheme Bill back to the House of Lords containing laws that could allow the Government to tell pension funds how they should invest a certain amount of their funds, so-called “mandation”.

Amendments by the Government limit the portion of pension funds in line with a voluntary agreement by 17 of the UK’s largest defined contribution schemes in the Mansion House Accord last year.

They would be limited to 10%, by value, of all assets of the scheme in main default reserves, or 5% of assets to be held in UK-specific description.

It comes amid aims to increase the amount of investment in the UK, which it is hoped will lead to economic growth.

Treasury minister Torsten Bell said the law is “designed to make clear on the face of the Bill that the power can only be used in line with what the industry itself has committed to”.

He added: “The cap prohibits any move beyond the accord targets.

“The neutrality requirement rules out the possibility that any government could direct any investment into a particular asset or asset classes.”

Mr Bell told MPs the rule is “highly constrained and narrowly focused”.

He said: “The Government cannot direct investments, and it explicitly only applies to main default funds, more explicitly matching the language used in the accord.”

Shadow work and pensions secretary Helen Whately criticised the move and said: “He said this is a natural extension of the Mansion House Agreement, it is not.

“A voluntary agreement between willing participants is one thing, a legal requirement imposed across an entire sector is another.

“Secondly he has said that it is merely a reserve power, one the Government has no intention of using.

“A reserve power does not sit harmlessly on the shelf, it shapes behaviour.

“I think in truth the minister accepts that, he has said as much to me before that the power will achieve its ends without even needing to be turned on.”

Labour MP and former Treasury minister Liam Byrne said: “The measures the minister has set out this afternoon really are essential if we are to pursue the long-term interests of pension savers in this country, because it is in their fundamental interest that they live and retire in an economy that is growing faster in the years to come.

“The only way in which we are going to collectively achieve that is if we raise the investment rate in this country.”

Abi Tierney held court with the Welsh press this afternoon

Welsh Rugby Union CEO Abi Tierney insists her position is not untenable and is determined to see through the reduction from four to three professional teams.

Many supporters on social media are calling for Tierney to follow WRU chair Richard Collier-Keywood through the exit door following the collapse of the Y11 deal to buy Cardiff Rugby. After months of uncertainty the WRU have offered PRA 25 to both the Ospreys and Scarlets, which means they will retain four clubs until 2028 before reducing to three teams.

But despite the toxicity thrown her way, Tierney is determined to continue in her role.

JOIN OUR WALES RUGBY FACEBOOK PAGE Latest news, analysis and much more

“Yes, I am,” said Tierney when asked whether she was committed to her role as CEO for the long term.

“In my position, you wouldn’t not challenge yourself about whether it’s the right thing to personally from a family and a health perspective.

“In the last year, it has been emotionally draining and exhausting and very stressful.

“But actually, there’s something really powerful about knowing that I choose to do this job.

“I don’t have to do this job. I choose to do it. I think I reflect on the instability that would come if you change the chair and the chief executive at the same time.

“I think that would bring more instability into Welsh rugby, which I don’t think is needed but I’m also very aware of the fact that a new chair may have a different view on that. And I will listen and obviously respect that view.”

Despite the ongoing uncertainty and the sense the WRU have kicked the can down the road when it comes to cutting the number of teams Tierney insists her position is not untenable.

“It depends how you define delivering a deal,” she said.

“If delivering a deal is to sell Cardiff at any price when it doesn’t make commercial sense then to me that’s not the right measure of whether you’ve been successful.

“I think as a CEO you’ve got to take the difficult decisions as well and I think there’s as many people out there who are pleased with the result.

“I don’t think delivering a deal for the sake of delivering a deal is a reason to go. We always said 28 (going down to three years). We’ve been really clear it was going to be in 28.”

Here is every word of our interview with Tierney.

Abi, just explain what’s happened and perhaps more importantly, why?