Sophie Cassidy was at the front of the train as she saw a van driver cross in front and collide with it

A young mum has told of the moment that she saw the train she was travelling on crash into a delivery van, killing the driver and leaving those on the train ‘screaming and crying’.

British Transport Police confirmed earlier today that the driver of a van died when his vehicle collided with a Northern Rail train at a level crossing in Burscough around 3pm.

A large emergency services presence arrived on the scene near Martin Lane and images showed the stationary train close to the wreckage of the van.

Click here to get the biggest stories straight to your inbox in our Daily Newsletter

The ECHO has now spoken to an eyewitness who was on the train and witnessed the horror up close. Young mum Sophie Cassidy was at the front of the train as it crashed into the van at the level crossing.

Sophie, 26, who had been attending the Southport Airshow with her one-year-old son and four-year-old daughter, was making her way back to her home in Burscough.

She said the man was driving a supermarket delivery van and she saw him approaching the level crossing from the window of the train as she was sat right at the front behind the driver’s cab with her children.

Sophie explained: “As the train was heading towards the level crossing, I was talking to my little boy and then out of the window I saw the driver of the delivery van heading towards the crossing. I couldn’t believe what I was seeing, I was thinking oh my god we are about to hit him. Surely he can see us?”

Describing the shocking moment the train ploughed into the van, she added: “When the train hit the van, it took out the whole front window of the train, if the driver hadn’t ducked out of the way he would have been killed. He was very lucky.

“The door that separates the driver from the carriage flew off as well. I was really worried we might derail with my kids. Everyone was screaming and crying. It was the most horrible thing I have ever experienced.”

The young mum shared images with the ECHO which showed the huge damage done to the front of the train, with the front window smashed in and the door hanging off. Debris can be seen all over the floor.

Sophie is adamant the driver of the train was not at fault in any way and said he “did everything in his power” to avoid hitting the van as it crossed the level crossing.

She said: “The train driver was actually amazing. After what he went through in the crash he came out to make sure the passengers were ok and offered us water and things. I hope he gets the recognition he deserves.”

She also praised the efforts of emergency workers who helped to treat some passengers for minor injuries and eventually were able to help people off the train after around two hours of waiting. She also said Northern train staff were “spot on.”

Speaking about the driver of the van, Sophie said tragically from her vantage point at the front of the train she was aware he could not have survived the crash. She said: “I was sat at the front when it happened, I knew he was going to die.”

A spokesperson for the British Transport Police said: “We were called to a level crossing in Burscough, West Lancashire following reports at 3:18pm today (29 August) that a train had struck a van. Paramedics and the fire service also attended.

“One person was in the van and sadly a man was pronounced dead at the scene. Two people who were passengers on the train received treatment for minor injuries. The incident is not being treated as suspicious.

“Enquiries are ongoing to establish the full circumstances of what happened, any witnesses who haven’t already spoken to police are asked to text BTP on 61016 quoting the reference 373 of 29 August.”

A recent call by Ukraine’s former defence minister, Mykhailo Fedorov, for new national elections in Ukraine – which would be the first to take place in the country since 2019 – has sparked a renewed debate about whether it is possible to hold a legitimate vote in wartime.

Under normal circumstances, Ukraine’s parliamentary elections would have been held in October 2023. Presidential elections would have followed in March 2024. But the circumstances are, of course, far from normal.

Almost a fifth of Ukraine is occupied by Russian troops, millions of people are displaced and citizens across the country are subject to daily missile and drone attacks.

Fedorov’s argument is that Ukraine is a free European state fighting to defend democracy. It should not be the Russian president, Vladimir Putin, who decides when Ukrainians get to choose their leaders, he argues.

On the face of it, it seems a simple argument. What sets a democracy aside from an autocracy is that its leaders are genuinely accountable to the electorate and periodically face the voters in open, free and fair elections. But is it as simple as that?

Fedorov’s argument has reignited a debate that has echoes of talking points routinely aired by Putin, who has questioned Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelensky’s continued legitimacy. The US president, Donald Trump, has also claimed that Ukraine is “using war not to hold an election”.

But in international terms, it is in fact not unusual for elections to be postponed when a country is under attack. Postponing elections in emergency situations until it is possible to hold them with full integrity can sometimes be justified on democratic grounds. During the second world war, for example, Britain postponed its 1940 election until 1945, focusing instead on defeating the threat to democracy itself from Nazi Germany.

The Ukrainian constitution declares that the state’s most important task is to defend the country’s sovereignty and territorial indivisibility. According to Zelensky, this is precisely what would be endangered by holding elections now.

Should Ukraine hold elections?

The arguments against holding elections while the war is still ongoing are threefold.

First, elections would rest on shaky legal ground. Article 83 of Ukraine’s constitution automatically extends parliament’s term under martial law. Article 19(1) of the Law on the Legal Regime of Martial Law also prohibits presidential, parliamentary and local elections during wartime.

Any election held against these provisions would almost certainly be challenged as illegal by the losing side. Despite Putin and Trump’s insinuations, the mandates of Zelensky and the current parliament remain fully legal.

Second, as the Council of Europe noted in 2022, it is doubtful that Ukraine could currently hold elections that meet domestic and international democratic standards. This is not due to any lack of desire to do so, but due to the war itself.

Elections require functioning infrastructure, accurate voter rolls, clearly defined electorates and territorial boundaries, fair competition and genuine opportunities to vote and stand for election. These are hard to guarantee while under full-scale attack.

With millions internally displaced or abroad, and Ukrainians in the Russian-occupied regions unable to vote and in many cases stripped involuntarily of their Ukrainian citizenship by Russia, accurate voting lists would be hard to compile. Voting itself would also be challenging, as around a quarter of polling stations and nearby public buildings have been damaged.

Ukrainians living abroad may also struggle both to vote and to stand for election. Many military personnel would find this similarly difficult as they would not be able to leave the front line. These issues would need time to resolve fairly and proportionately.

Third, holding an election would require Ukrainians to redirect political energy and economic and military resources away from the struggle for state survival to ensuring the security of the electoral process.

One of Russia’s war aims is the removal of the Ukrainian government from power. And it is unlikely to watch passively while an election unfolds. Russia continues to fire hundreds of missiles at Ukraine each day that could target polling places or campaign events. This makes it impossible to hold a genuinely open election campaign and ensure the safety of candidates and voters.

It is also highly likely that Russia would attempt to influence the process through disinformation, propaganda and tacit support of certain candidates – as it has done in other neighbouring countries.

Ahead of elections in 2025, Moldovan president Maia Sandu warned of a Russian-backed operation to interfere with the vote. This included recruiting orthodox priests to sway voters towards supporting Russia-aligned political parties, as well as extensive algorithm manipulation on TikTok. Moldova’s ruling pro-European Party of Action and Solidarity ultimately won the election.

It perhaps seems paradoxical, but Ukrainian democracy may be stronger in the meantime without elections. There has been a wide political agreement from all parts of the Ukrainian political spectrum since Fedorov made his remarks that the legitimacy of the government would not be strengthened if it was elected through elections deemed illegal under national law, incomplete in terms of the people enfranchised and potentially manipulated by outside forces.

Securing state sovereignty remains Ukraine’s first priority for the preservation of a democratic European future.

When Star Trek first appeared on television screens 60 years ago, audiences expected science fiction to offer aliens, monsters and futuristic technology. What they encountered was something far more ambitious.

From its very first broadcast episode on September 8 1966, Star Trek established that its true subject was the exploration of humanity itself. For all its reputation as an action-packed space adventure, the franchise has endured because it repeatedly returned to a universal question: what does it mean to be human?

In that first episode, entitled The Man Trap, the alien antagonist survives by appearing to each observer as the person they most wish to see. Dr Leonard “Bones” McCoy meets a lost love from his past; others see figures shaped by memory, expectation, desire and longing.

The creature, soon dubbed the “salt vampire” by fans of the series, is not simply a shape-shifter. Its power lies in exploiting human perception. Rather than asking viewers to fear an alien with superior strength or advanced weaponry, the episode asks a more profound question: can we trust our experience of reality?

Sixty years on, this question looks remarkably prescient. Modern neuroscience increasingly suggests that perception is not a passive recording of the external world. According to theories of predictive processing, the brain continually generates expectations and compares them with incoming sensory information.

The philosopher Andy Clark has described the brain as a “prediction machine”. Neuroscientist Anil Seth argues that our experience of reality can be understood as a form of “controlled hallucination”, generated by the brain but constrained by evidence from the senses.

Long before such ideas were articulated, The Man Trap imagined a world in which people confront the same reality, but perceive it in profoundly different ways – based not only on what they see, but what they want to see.

This insight links the episode to a much older intellectual tradition. The ancient Greek philosopher Plato’s allegory of the cave imagined people mistaking shadows for reality, confusing appearance with truth.

The USS Enterprise crew’s first alien encounter offers a 20th-century variation on the same theme. They actively participate in their own deception because the creature reflects their hopes, memories and desires.

This helps explain why The Man Trap feels strikingly contemporary. In today’s world, shaped by algorithmically curated information, political polarisation and increasingly personalised media environments, disagreement is often less about opinions than competing versions of reality itself.

The nature of humanity

Star Trek’s memorable debut was not an isolated exploration of a philosophical problem. It was the beginning of a broader inquiry into the nature of humanity.

The Devil in the Dark (first aired March 1967) explores empathy and the challenge of understanding the unfamiliar. The apparently monstrous Horta is revealed to be an intelligent life-form protecting its offspring, forcing viewers to reconsider assumptions about difference and otherness.

The Enemy Within (October 1966) shifts the inquiry inward, splitting Captain James T. Kirk into opposing aspects of his personality and challenging the assumption that human beings can divide their virtues from their vices.

The episode argues that the qualities that make Kirk an effective leader – courage, decisiveness and resolve – are inseparable from darker instincts such as aggression and desire. Rather than presenting humanity as a triumph over these impulses, the episode suggests that human identity itself depends upon their integration.

The City on the Edge of Forever (April 1967), regarded by many as the series’ masterpiece, shifts the focus to ethics. Kirk discovers that saving the woman he loves would alter history catastrophically, forcing him to choose between personal happiness and moral responsibility.

Together, these and many more of the 79 original Star Trek episodes form a remarkable investigation into human nature. The progression reveals a series less interested in strange new worlds than the human beings who encounter them.

Philosophical inquiry

While many science-fiction programmes have aged with their technologies, Star Trek has endured because its deepest questions remain unresolved. We still debate perception, identity, empathy, consciousness and moral responsibility, because they are permanent features of human existence.

At its best, Star Trek engaged science fiction as a form of philosophical inquiry. Alien civilisations became thought experiments about prejudice and empathy. Time travel became a vehicle for exploring ethics. Artificial intelligence became a means of questioning consciousness and identity. The future it imagined served as a laboratory for understanding ourselves.

The closing moments of The Man Trap illustrate this perfectly. Reflecting on the death of the salt vampire, Kirk recalls his conversation with the archaologist Robert Crater, who has long been working on the planet, about the fate of the American bison – driven to the brink of extinction by humans.

This comparison transforms what might have been a conventional monster story into something morally complex. The creature is dangerous yet is also the last of its kind. Is it merely a predator, or the victim of a larger tragedy?

The episode, like many others, offers no simple answer. Crater views the creature from a perspective of compassion and preservation. Kirk simply sees an immediate threat to his crew. Both are responding to the same reality, yet they arrive at different conclusions.

The original Star Trek’s lasting legacy is not technological prophecy, but a sustained exploration of what it means to be human. Its enduring achievement lies not in predicting mobile phones, iPads or video calls, but in recognising that the most fascinating and vexing mystery remains humanity itself.

The final frontier, it suggests, lies not among the stars but within ourselves.

The celebrity chef took to the stage three times today (August 29), demonstrating his culinary skills while keeping audiences entertained with plenty of jokes along the way.

One of the dishes saw James recreate the fast-food favourite using his own unusual addition – cornflakes.

James spoke about KFC’s famously guarded blend of herbs and spices, telling the audience he had found a version of the recipe online after it was reportedly revealed by a relative of the chain’s founder, Colonel Harland Sanders.

He used the seasoning to create his own version of the chicken but swapped a conventional breadcrumb coating for crushed cornflakes to give it a crispy finish.

James also made homemade mayonnaise to serve alongside the chicken, demonstrating how to make it from scratch for the audience.

Another dish he managed to demonstrate in just under 35 minutes was a French onion tart, made using puff pastry and chopped onions cooked in butter before being finished with crème fraîche.

The fast-paced cooking was mixed with stories, tips and jokes from James, who has become one of the festival’s most familiar celebrity faces.

Reflecting on his long association with the event, he told the crowd: “We’re back here, 16 years I have been doing this.”

“It’s great to be here.”

This year’s appearance also marked a change from his usual festival routine.

James has traditionally appeared on bank holiday Monday but was instead on stage on Saturday this year – something he was more than happy to joke about.

He said: “It’s so nice to have the bank holiday off, it will be the first one in ages.

“They got me in today instead – and after last night, now I know why, because I was cooking hundreds of starters for last night’s gala dinner!”

His appearances followed a busy Friday evening at the festival, when he was among the chefs cooking for the gala dinner.

The Yorkshire-born chef, who now lives in Hampshire, also found himself back in more familiar northern weather.

He joked that he had not seen rain for four months at home, only to arrive in Bolton as the rain poured down outside.

Speaking to The Bolton News ahead of his demonstrations, James praised the event and explained why he has continued returning to Bolton over the years.

He said: “It’s the biggest and the best.”

Bolton Food and Drink Festival continues until Monday, August 31, with food and drink stalls, live entertainment and demonstrations taking place across the town centre.

Chantelle Cameron produced one of the finest displays of her career to beat Mikaela Mayer and add the WBA and WBC light middleweight titles to her WBO belt.

An engrossing encounter was narrowly won by the British fighter by unanimous decision – 97-93 on two scorecards and 96-94 on the other.

American Mayer disagreed with the decision, claiming she “outboxed” Cameron – leading to an angry exchange of words in the ring.

The possibility of a rematch was also floated, with Mayer also suggesting Cameron had benefited from home advantage – to the champion’s chagrin, as she said “talk is cheap”.

It means Cameron remains unbeaten since her second fight with Katie Taylor in 2023, and with 23 victories in 24 professional encounters.

And this was one of her best displays. These fighters were evenly matched in every metric – from punch rate to height and weight, even hairstyle.

But Cameron won out thanks to her unrelenting pressure, which never allowed the usually adaptable Mayer to figure out a winning gameplan.

Mayer was the more imposing figure early on, but Cameron played counterpuncher until she could get onto the front foot.

Cameron forced Mayer against the ropes in round four, and again at the start of the fifth. Increasingly confident to take the initiative, she was roared on by a partisan but disappointingly small home crowd.

Mayer was unable to get in behind her jab for long periods and was bleeding and breathing heavily by round six.

The home favourite was cut in the final rounds but pushed through and was lifted shoulder high by her team before her biggest win since beating Taylor in Dublin three years ago was announced.

For three-weight world champion Mayer, this is the third defeat of her 25-fight career and costs her the WBA and WBC belts, which Cameron now puts with her WBO title.

Shortly before entering Downing Street, Andy Burnham made a promise that appeared to be reassuring in its simplicity. “I won’t change,” he said. “I have a style. It’s my style.”

Burnham’s political appeal partly rests on the impression that there is little distance between the politician and the person. His black T-shirt and jacket, attachment to Everton football club and the band New Order, ease with crowds and habit of speaking without notes all reinforce a recognisable persona. After the more reserved Keir Starmer, Burnham’s informality has been part of the attraction.

À lire aussi :
No lectern and the promise of a ‘new model’ – what we can learn from Andy Burnham’s speech

Burnham has also been described as a people pleaser, raising questions about whether he would be willing to disappoint or anger people when a decision requires it. Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch used the same label in questioning his fitness to make difficult choices.

Yet the description is difficult to reconcile with his record. His campaigning for the Hillsborough families suggests a politician prepared to pursue difficult causes. His first instruction as prime minister launched a drive to end rough sleeping, and he has pledged to spend “political capital” on social care.

Social care in particular raises unavoidable questions about who should bear the cost. Choosing it as an early priority sits uneasily with the idea that Burnham is mainly concerned with approval.

The problem with the label is that it frames the leadership test too narrowly. The sharper question is how Burnham’s instincts will operate in government. A leader driven to correct what he feels is wrong may create energy and direction. But a prime minister must also decide which problems to address first, how much political capital each can consume, and what must wait.

His promise therefore prompts a larger leadership concern. Does staying authentic require him to behave as he always has?

Time to start disappointing people?

A recognisable style can help to build trust, while abrupt changes may invite accusations of opportunism. Yet governing creates demands that do not exist when you’re campaigning, in opposition or a regional leader.

As mayor of Greater Manchester, Burnham built much of his reputation by not being part of the political centre. He could press Westminster for more money, criticise national policy and speak for a region that felt overlooked. In Downing Street, he is at the centre. He must now arbitrate among competing claims, accept responsibility for trade-offs and disappoint groups whose demands cannot all be met.

The identity that has served him well is that of the campaigner who identifies a neglected problem, mobilises attention and presses for action. Campaigning provides immediate and visible feedback through public response, media attention and a clear sense of momentum. In government, the results are slower and dispersed across institutions. Often they only become apparent several years later.

Under pressure, returning to campaign mode may therefore feel familiar and productive for Burnham. But repeated appeals to urgency or a preoccupation with worthy causes could produce too many initiatives competing for limited capacity.

The prime minister must sometimes be the approachable listener – it appears that Burnham already knows how to do this. At other times, he must slow down an initiative, defend an unpopular compromise, create distance, absorb criticism or tell supporters that a worthy proposal cannot yet be funded. The politician who prospered by challenging authority now must exercise it.

Psychologists use the term self-monitoring to describe the capacity to notice social and situational cues and adjust behaviour accordingly. It has sometimes implied a lack of authenticity. Someone who self-monitors becomes a social chameleon, changing colours to suit the audience.

But the evidence is more complicated; self-monitoring is different to seeking approval. It involves recognising what a situation requires and adjusting accordingly. Burnham can read an audience, but the test in Downing Street is whether he can respond as readily to less visible cues – things like capacity issues, competing claims for funds and the need to achieve things in a short space of time.

A better description of what leaders need is repertoire. This accords with the idea of multiple selves. People behave differently across roles and relationships without assuming that one version is false or inauthentic. A leader may be decisive in a crisis, curious in discussion, supportive when a colleague is struggling and demanding when standards slip. Each can be a genuine capacity of the same person, with context determining which should come to the fore.

An indication that Burnham’s repertoire is wider than he has perhaps been given credit for is the way he showed he can adopt a more statesmanlike role in his first overseas trip to Ukraine in August 2026. The evidence is in his formal attire, chairing the “coalition of the willing” meeting, and firm tone in declaring continuing UK support for Ukraine.

At the same time, he rebuffed Russian criticism that the UK was adding fuel to the fire with the no-nonsense response: “Who started the fire? That’s the question isn’t it?” There will be much tougher tests, of course.

A prime minister needs to remain close to public sentiment while creating distance from it, press for change while pacing reform, and advocate a cause while arbitrating among competing claims. This implies Burnham will need to bring forward a less visible part of his repertoire, the patient institutional leader who delegates, sets priorities and accepts that lasting reform rarely moves at campaign speed.

We already know that he can connect with people, recognise their frustrations and draw attention to causes he believes deserve action. What remains unclear is whether he can convert those instincts into a coherent and sustainable programme of government. In that sense, Burnham’s authenticity will be tested by whether he can expand his leadership and change his style when necessary without losing the moral and political identity that brought him to office.

Arthur Fery missed out on his first ATP Tour title with a straight-set defeat by Ignacio Buse in the final of the Winston-Salem Open.

Fery, who was the talk of Wimbledon as he reached the semi-finals of his home major in July, lost 6-3 6-2 to Peru’s Buse.

The 24-year-old was the first Briton to reach the final of the ATP 250 tournament in North Carolina and will rise to 33 in the world rankings as a result – overtaking Cameron Norrie as British number one.

Only eight weeks ago, before his astonishing run to the last four at the All England Club, he was ranked outside the top 100.

Little could separate Fery and Buse in the early stages of their match on Saturday, before the Peruvian took control with a break to love for a 5-3 lead.

Fery quickly fell further behind in the second set as Buse opened up a double break cushion with no reply, and while he pulled back one of those breaks, it proved to no avail as his opponent reeled off three straight games to seal the win.

For 22-year-old Buse, victory makes him the youngest ever winner of Winston-Salem and marks a second career title after he beat American Tommy Paul at the ATP 500 event in Hamburg in May.

With little time to reflect on his Winston-Salem run, Fery will now head to New York for the US Open, which starts on Sunday.

Set to play at Flushing Meadows for the first time, he faces a tough opening tie against Italian 13th seed Lorenzo Musetti.

Fery is one of nine British players set to feature in the main draws at the US Open, the final Grand Slam of the season.

Joining him in the men’s draw are Norrie and Jan Choinski, qualifiers Toby Samuel and Harry Wendelken, and lucky loser Jacob Fearnley.

Katie Boulter is joined by qualifiers Fran Jones and Harriet Dart in the women’s draw, but both Jack Draper and Emma Raducanu are missing through injury.

Located on the outskirts of Phoenix, a small town hugely reliant on the Colorado River has restricted development, reopened disused wells and negotiated new water agreements.

Yet Cave Creek Mayor Robert Morris fears these efforts will prove insufficient to sustain the desert enclave of roughly 5,000 residents long into the future. Furthermore, a recent federal initiative intended to tackle the worsening crisis across the river basin will offer no help.

Cave Creek draws almost all its supply from the river, which provides water to 40 million people across the US West but has been shrinking due to climate change, demand and excessive use. The town was compelled to reduce consumption this year and stands to lose even more under the new federal proposal.

Morris likened the situation to planning for a meteor strike.

“You can see it coming, but you can’t get out of the way and you don’t know what the damage is going to be,” he said.

The uncertainty stretches across seven U.S. states, tribal nations and Mexico. Farmers are deciding which crops are worth the investment. Phoenix could lose some municipal and industrial water for the first time and turn to backup supplies. And residents could face even more costly water.

Nevada raised the stakes this week by suing the Interior Department and the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation, saying basic needs in the Las Vegas region will go unmet if the area has to absorb planned reductions of up to 70% of its Colorado River water in the next decade.

The bureau said Thursday it does not comment on litigation.

“The uncertainty is going to continue to build in the wrong direction,” said Tom Buschatzke, director of the Arizona Department of Water Resources.

Western reservoirs see record lows

In the U.S. West, water is stored primarily in reservoirs, aquifers and snowpacks. But a record snow drought means there’s far less water to recharge those sources.

The two largest reservoirs in the country serve as barometers of health for the Colorado River system: Lake Mead and Lake Powell. Both hit record lows this month.

Eight other reservoirs operated by the Bureau of Reclamation recently recorded the lowest levels in at least the last 30 years. Among them is Elephant Butte Lake in New Mexico that’s critical for supplying water for crops in southern New Mexico, Texas and Mexico. The Green Mountain Reservoir serves the western part of Colorado, and the Guernsey Reservoir in Wyoming funnels water to farmers in the eastern part of the state and western Nebraska.

Under the Bureau of Reclamation’s plan, California, Nevada and Arizona will collectively reduce water use by 1.25 million acre-feet (about 1.54 billion cubic meters) — enough to fill over 600,000 Olympic-sized swimming pools — annually in the next two years, with the possibility of larger cuts depending on conditions. Colorado, Utah, Wyoming and New Mexico are not required to make cuts for now but could voluntarily reduce water.

While El Niño could bring intense moisture to the northern Rockies and the Southwest in the coming months, it won’t erase decades of drought.

“Drought is a slow-moving phenomena and it can take some time to come into it and also come out of it,” said David Mocko, senior research scientist who authored a recent U.S. Drought Monitor map.

Farmers are reluctant to plant

John Boelts grows vegetables, melons, durum wheat and other crops in Yuma, Arizona — a region that produces about 90% of leafy greens eaten in North America during the winter.

Farmers there have high-priority rights and may avoid cuts to their Colorado River supply over the next two years but, Boelts said, the reprieve isn’t enough to make longer-term plans. That makes farmers reluctant to plant new acreage.

Citrus, date and other orchard crops that thrive in the region take years to become commercially productive, he said.

“There’s no food that we grow in a hurry,” said Boelts, the Arizona Farm Bureau president. “Beef takes years to produce. The lettuce you eat today? A farmer was working on how they would grow that crop six plus months ago.”

Ray Martinez grows alfalfa on a reservation that’s home to the Colorado River Indian Tribes. The tribe holds some of the river’s oldest rights, and while its Arizona allocation is huge, an old irrigation system and the lack of infrastructure have kept much of the water out of reach.

Martinez and the water department are concerned about having enough water to finish this growing season. He has left some fields unplanted for years to help prop up Lake Mead. If the reservoir keeps dropping, he said, surface water coming to him and neighboring farms will be further limited.

“Unfortunately, Mother Nature has its own way of doing things, and we have no control of that,” he added.

DUBLIN (AP) — New North Carolina quarterback Billy Edwards Jr. threw for 232 yards, Aeron Burrell kicked two field goals and the Tar Heels opened coach Bill Belichick’s second season with a 15-10 win over TCU on a rainy Saturday in Ireland for the Aer Lingus Classic.

TCU didn’t score again after going up 10-3 on its first two drives. The Horned Frogs got the ball eight more times, and were stopped on fourth-and-short deep in Tar Heels territory on their last two drives.

The 74-year-old Belichick, who won six Super Bowls coaching the New England Patriots, was 4-8 in his college debut with the Tar Heels last year. That season began with a 48-14 home loss to TCU in prime time on Labor Day.

“I’m just happy for the players. They’ve worked really hard,” Belichick said. “To have positive results back up that hard work, reinforces it. I think they’ve been believing in what we’re doing, but I think this just gives everybody a little bit more belief and we’ve just got to keep building.”

The Tar Heels ran out the final 4:05 after new TCU quarterback Jaden Craig threw an incompletion when rolling left on fourth-and-2 from the 10, when the Harvard transfer may have been able to run for a first down. Craig finished 20-of-32 passing for 175 yards.

Jeremy Payne, who ran for 142 yards, was stuffed on fourth-and-1 from the 5 on TCU’s previous drive.

“Looking back now obviously, I wish we had kicked the two field goals, but at the time, it makes sense to try,” TCU coach Sonny Dykes said. “When you’re not moving the football, you’ve got to try to get the ball in the end zone.”

After Payne was stopped, the Frogs got the ball for the last time after North Carolina had a 13-play drive that ended with Burrell missing a 42-yard field goal attempt.

Payne had a 48-yard run on TCU’s opening drive and the Frogs had 111 yards on the ground by halftime. They had only 26 after halftime.

North Carolina last season never had a halftime lead against a Power Four opponent, but went ahead 12-10 on a safety with 1:49 left in the first half of the first major college football game this season. TCU punter John Hoyet Chance kicked the ball out of the back of the end zone after the snap sailed over his head.

Edwards, a transfer from Wisconsin, completed 16 of 28 passes. Jordan Shipp had five catches for 71 yards and Jaylen McGill had the Tar Heels’ only TD, on a 9-yard run in the first quarter after they had converted a fourth-and-7.

Heels strong on defensive front

Burrell’s second field goal, a 28-yarder that made it 15-10 early in the second half, was set up by Melkart Abou Jaoude’s blindside sack of Craig that forced a fumble recovered by Jaylen Harvey at the TCU 31. Abou Jaoude had 10 1/2 sacks last season.

Xavier Lewis had 4 1/2 tackles for loss with two sacks.

Big game for Small

TCU’s only touchdown was set up by Ed Small’s 33-yard punt return to the UNC 25, then he had a 13-yard catch. Jon Denman scored on a 2-yard run for a 10-3 lead with four minutes left in the first quarter. Small had nine catches for 65 yards.

The takeaway

North Carolina had 10 points and 141 total yards in the first quarter with new offensive coordinator Bobby Petrino. The Tar Heels scored 10 points in the first quarter only once last year but never had more yards. They finished with 322 total yards.

TCU had scored at least 30 points in its last 10 season openers, which was the longest active FBS streak.

Up next

Both teams have an open date before their home openers Sept. 12. North Carolina hosts East Tennessee State, and TCU plays Grambling State.

___

Sign up for Top 25 poll alerts here. Visit the Top 25 here and see AP’s full college football coverage here.

By CONNIE RUSK, ASSOCIATE SHOWBUSINESS EDITOR

Published: 22:01 BST, 29 August 2026 | Updated: 22:54 BST, 29 August 2026

The X Factor is reportedly set to return, seven years after it was retired from screens. 

According to sources, ITV is said to be in talks with production company Talkback Thames about bringing the singing competition back in a bid to boost viewing figures. 

The X Factor pulled in 19million viewers during its heyday and saw contestants such as Leona Lewis and One Direction become household names. 

After 15 series, it was shelved by ITV and went on to have two spin-off series X Factor: Celebrity and X Factor: The Band. 

Advertisement

It is thought head judge Simon Cowell is likely to return in some sort of capacity. 

Insiders claim the broadcaster is keen on bringing it back with a revamp after new shows The Neighbourhood and The Fortune Hotel were panned. 

The X Factor is reportedly set to return, seven years after it retired from screens (pictured judges Louis Walsh, Simon Cowell, Nicole Scherzinger and host Dermot O’Leary) 

Advertisement

It is thought head judge Simon Cowell is likely to return in some sort of capacity

A source told The Sun: ‘ITV have a giant gaping hole that needs filling in its entertainment schedule, particularly over weekends when bigger viewing figures are up for grabs.

‘ITV can’t afford another disaster after the car crash of The Neighbourhood, which was colossally expensive and failed terribly. Rather than creating more flop formats they have the opportunity to give The X Factor, a sure-fire hit, a modern makeover. 

‘They can explore a younger, fresher panel, with new faces and have Cowell behind the scenes. The plan is for the show’s return to take on a new life and be updated to envelop social media generation.’

Advertisement

The Daily Mail has contacted ITV for comment.  

Earlier this year it was reported Simon had signed up for a new X Factor documentary featuring behind-the-scenes footage. 

Sky has described the untitled show as a ‘definitive documentary series exploring the era-defining entertainment juggernaut’. 

The X Factor was presented by Kate Thornton, Dermot O’Leary, Caroline Flack and Olly Murs over the years. 

Advertisement

Simon was joined on the judging panel with a number of famous faces including Sharon Osbourne, Louis Walsh, Dannii Minogue, Cheryl, Gary Barlow and Tulisa.

The X Factor pulled in 19million viewers during its heyday and saw contestants such as Leona Lewis and One Direction become household names

Kelly Rowland, Nicole Scherzinger, Mel B, Rita Ora, Ayda Field, Robbie Williams and Louis Tomlinson also joined him at some point over the years. 

The contestants who took part were put into one of four groups – the boys, girls, over-25s and groups. 

Advertisement

And they were also mentored by a number of celebrities including Simon, Sharon, Louis, Cheryl, Dannii and Nicole. 

The show became a huge fan favourite and there have been a number of huge success stories from the singing show, which saw singers audition at the start of the series to try and make it to the live shows, which aired on a Saturday night. 

They include Olly Murs, Little Mix, One Direction, JLS, Leona Lewis and James Arthur.