Protesters say they have shut down London’s Waterloo station in a protest against the Starmer regime’s plan to sentence anti-genocide protesters as terrorists:

View this post on Instagram

A post shared by غريب بين الغرباء (@solidarity.diary)

Starmer regime — Rigged system

The jury at the first trial refused to convict any of the six defendants on any of the state’s charges relating to damage to an Israeli-owned weapons factory. This was after police and security guards’ claims didn’t match CCTV evidence. At the retrial, security service-linked judge Jeremy Johnson banned any mention of the fact that the activists carried out their action to prevent the slaughter of Palestinian civilians. He banned lawyers from telling jurors of their legal right to acquit. Johnson even banned the media from reporting that the defendants might be sentenced under terror legislation — despite no terror charges being brought against them.

Despite the attempts to stack the trial in the state’s favour, two of the activists were acquitted on all charges. None were convicted of any violent intent. Yet the government is pressing for terror-related sentencing despite no terror charges ever being brought. This would mean much longer prison time and draconian conditions imposed on the young activists for decades even after release. These could include having to register their phones with the authorities, report on any relationships and obtain permission to travel.

Legal experts have condemned the plan as unconstitutional and a breach of the justice system. Thousands of members of the public have signed a complaint to the government about it. The Starmer regime must not be permitted to destroy UK rights and justice for the sake of Israel.

Featured image via ES

By Skwawkbox

Source link

VERY SUPERSTITIOUS: For the first three quarters, it looked like the San Antonio Spurs were going to cream the Knicks in last night’s Game 4 of the NBA Finals.

But in an epic comeback, the Knicks overcame the Spurs’ 29-point lead — a new record in an NBA Finals game — and beat San Antonio 107-106, putting the hometown team just one win away from claiming its first championship in over five decades.

In New York political circles, there was an almost singular explanation for the unbelievable come-from-behind victory: The Trump curse had been lifted.

“THANK YOU TO THE PEOPLE WHO BLESSED MSG TODAY TO GET THE STANK VIBES OUT,” Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez wrote on X just before midnight. “YOUR SERVICE IS APPRECIATED.”

The progressive lawmaker’s all-caps missive was a reference to superstitious Knicks fans burning sage outside Madison Square Garden to cleanse it of what they saw as the bad juju President Donald Trump cast over the team by attending Monday’s Game 3 (which the Spurs won 115-111).

Queens Borough President Donovan Richards suggested Staten Island’s own Wu-Tang Clan — which performed last night’s halftime show at MSG — had a hand in rooting out the bad vibes. “Wu-Tang is for the children!!!” Richards wrote on X in response to a video of the rap group’s performance captioned: “Wu-Tang Clan have broken Donald Trump’s curse on the Knicks.”

No matter what brand of superstition is at play, it’s unmistakable that the Knicks’ playoff prowess has led New Yorkers to search for otherworldly explanations — and it seems to be the only thing local politicians can talk about.

In an Instagram video posted late last night, House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries suggested there was a more cerebral catalyst for the Knicks’ latest win.

“Wemby tried to taunt the Knicks when they were up by about 29, suggesting that he was in our heads,” Jeffries said in a video, referring to Spurs center Victor Wembanyama. “No. Actually Wemby, we were in your head.”

For his part, Mayor Zohran Mamdani turned to God for guidance about the Knicks.

“Knicks in five — inshallah, baby, let’s go,” he practically shouted on Hot 97 radio this morning, using the Arabic term for “God willing.”

Game 5 of the Finals is Saturday in San Antonio. If the Knicks win, they will claim the championship trophy for the first time since 1973.

Not everything has been peaches and cream in the Big Apple when it comes to the Knickerbockers, though.

An NYPD spokesperson said 56 Knicks fans were taken into custody last night after massive and destructive crowds converged near The Garden to “celebrate” the victory.

According to the spokesperson, 10 officers were injured in the rampage, including one who got hit in the head with a glass bottle as the crowds jumped on top of moving vehicles, tried to flip over a parked cab and set off fireworks.

“This demonstrates exactly why the NYPD has increased our presence in and around Madison Square Garden,” the police spokesperson said.

The chaos unfolded after Knicks owner James Dolan canceled last night’s ticketed watch party outside MSG because he was angry with Mamdani and NYPD Commissioner Jessica Tisch for blocking unauthorized pedestrian traffic in a large swath of Midtown around the arena due to security concerns. — Chris Sommerfeldt

From the Capitol

MESSAGE RECEIVED: Gov. Kathy Hochul responded today to White House border czar Tom Homan’s threat of an ICE surge into the Empire State.

“It’s not how we do things in New York,” Hochul said at an event in Queens. “Maybe Washington is a different breed there, and they think that intimidation and creating fear is a way to govern, and we’re just rejecting that here in the state of New York. That’s not who we are, never has been, never will be.”

Homan’s threats come after Hochul and state lawmakers sealed a deal on a package of measures meant to protect undocumented immigrants, following ICE’s deportation operation in Minneapolis. The bills would limit civil deportation warrants from being executed in sensitive locations and prevent law enforcement, including ICE agents, from wearing masks.

Homan blamed Hochul for the threatened surge after she signed legislation ending so-called 287(g) agreements that enable local law enforcement to share resources with federal authorities.

Hochul said such a surge would be “contrary” to what Trump previously told her. The governor also mentioned that Homan’s reasoning does not apply since only nine counties in New York previously participated in the 287(g) program — and none of those include any of New York City’s five counties.

“New York City, where we’re predicting he’ll send the agents to, has never had a 287(g) agreement. They’ve never been allowed to use the jails. Never been allowed to use local police enforcement,” the governor said. “It is irrational. It shows that they do not comprehend what is happening in the state of New York.” — Leah Clark

FROM THE CAMPAIGN TRAIL

TRIALS AND TRIBULATIONS: A federal judge found former New York City Comptroller Brad Lander not guilty of misdemeanor obstruction Thursday for blocking an elevator while protesting last year outside an immigrant holding area.

Lander was hit with the obstruction charge in September while demonstrating in support of detained immigrants at 26 Federal Plaza in Lower Manhattan. He was offered a deal to drop the charge but opted instead for a trial to draw attention to the federal government’s immigration policies.

Lander said he was there with state legislators to view the facility’s conditions, not to purposefully block an elevator — and that he would have moved if asked. In reading his findings, Judge Henry Ricardo described Lander’s testimony as consistent with video evidence, noting that his movements didn’t suggest he was purposefully trying to block the elevator and that Lander appeared “tired and a bit resigned.”

“No offense to Mr. Lander,” the judge said.

Lander — who entered the courtroom in good spirits and holding a Knicks hat — told reporters after the verdict: “I didn’t feel tired.”

“I felt an urgency to show up that day and try to fight what ICE is doing,” he said.

After a month’s delay, Lander finally had his first day in court Wednesday — less than two weeks before the primary election — bringing immigration even more to the forefront in the waning days of his campaign against Democratic Rep. Dan Goldman.

Goldman, who often highlights his oversight visits at immigrant detention centers and his “triage center” to support detainees near 26 Federal Plaza, has repeatedly criticized Lander for his approach to immigration. On Wednesday, he referred to Lander’s case as “performative” and “self-promoting.” At a debate last week, Goldman chided him for the rhetorical refrain that he puts his “body on the line” for immigrants and for fundraising off of it.

“While Brad never did get the information he sought from ICE, I have all of that information from my weekly oversight visits and would be happy to brief him,” Goldman said in a statement.

Read more from Madison Fernandez in POLITICO. 

POLL POSITION: The race between Rep. Adriano Espaillat and primary challenger Darializa Avila Chevalier is close in the final stretch of the campaign, according to a pro-Avila Chevalier poll.

The survey, conducted by Data for Progress for Justice Democrats, the progressive group that recruited the challenger, found Avila Chevalier with 39 percent of support compared to Espaillat’s 35 percent. Twenty-two percent of respondents were undecided.

The poll was conducted among 319 likely Democratic primary voters from June 3 to 9, after Mamdani endorsed Avila Chevalier — and as pro-Espaillat entities bombarded the airwaves with negative attacks against her. It has a margin of error of plus-or-minus 5 percentage points.

The survey also shows that 86 percent of respondents in the district either have a very favorable or somewhat favorable view of the mayor. Avila Chevalier is leaning heavily into Mamdani’s endorsement.

There’s no public polling in the race, though it’s evident Espaillat’s allies are anticipating a tight battle, considering the millions of dollars being poured into the race on his behalf in the homestretch. — Madison Fernandez

FROM CITY HALL

2029 VISION: Most political players in New York are focused on this month’s primary elections — but Mamdani is already looking well beyond them.

In a text message blast this afternoon, the mayor asked supporters to donate “any amount” they can to his 2029 reelection campaign, telling them he needs to start fundraising now because the opposition will “be better funded, better organized and ready to spend earlier than before.”

“Their fundraising is constant and prolific,” he wrote in the text obtained by Playbook. “In closed-door meetings, wealthy donors and insider operatives consider how to influence our politics year-round. That’s how our opponents secured the resources to spend $83 million against our movement last year … That’s why we’re making investments in our movement starting right now.”

Mamdani’s missive did not identify the individuals behind the opposition he described.

But a group called NYC Common Sense, spearheaded by former independent mayoral candidate Jim Walden and political consultant Phil Singer, launched last month with a stated goal of fighting his agenda with ads, policy papers and lawsuits. The group, whose formation was first reported by The New York Times, has already raised $1 million from as-of-yet unidentified donors.

Mamdani’s pivot to 2029 fundraising indicates he’s taking the nascent opposition to his democratic socialist project seriously. Trip Yang, a longtime Democratic strategist, acknowledged it’s relatively early to fundraise for 2029. Still, he said it’s a smart move.

“A strong early fundraising number is important to show the reelection is well-positioned,” Yang said.

Read more from Chris Sommerfeldt in POLITICO.

STILL LOADING: City Council Speaker Julie Menin exuded confidence today over the newly introduced protest buffer zone bill around education facilities, which has the backing of 35 council members, a veto-proof super majority.

“I did speak with the mayor about the bill. We had a brief conversation about it,” Menin said at a press conference. “I think the new bill really addresses some concerns that we had heard.”

Menin said the revised measure would still achieve the original proposal’s goals but more narrowly defines which types of locations are included. Universities, which were flash points for some of the country’s most heated demonstrations, have been excluded from the new bill.

The original measure was vetoed by Mamdani in April after he raised concerns about its broad definition of educational facilities and the potential impacts on protests tied to ICE, fossil fuel divestment and Palestinian rights.

He allowed a similar bill to become law in April while voicing opposition to both buffer-zone bills’ framing of “all protest as a security concern.”

A spokesperson for the mayor said the administration is still “reviewing the new version of the legislation.”  — Gelila Negesse

IN OTHER NEWS

— BAIT AND SWITCH: A year after New York City banned broker fees, renters say the charges never really left. (Gothamist)

— COURT-ORDERED VISITS: New York will begin to require judges to make recurring visits to prisons after years of a long-neglected oversight rule not being met. (The City Reporter)

— STRAPPED FOR CASH: The Mamdani administration is considering invoking a fiscal exception to delay required payments to nonprofits, citing cash constraints. (NBC New York)

Missed this morning’s New York Playbook? We forgive you. Read it here.

Source link

The World Professional Association for Transgender Health (WPATH) and its European counterpart (EPATH) have issued a joint statement expressing their “deep concern” regarding NHS plans to suspend hormone prescriptions for trans under-18s in England.

On 9 March, NHS England published a draft clinical policy outlining its plan for public consultation. In essence, it proposed that:

MAF (masculinising and feminising) Hormones are not recommended to be available as a routine commissioning option through the NHS Children and Young People’s Gender Service.

This represents a sharp break from the current clinical policy, which was itself updated in 2024 in a knee-jerk response to the Cass Review. It permits the restricted use of MAF hormones for individuals aged 16 or 17 years old.

That consultation ended on 7 June. In response, WPATH-EPATH joint statement made clear the expert bodies’ assessment that:

prohibiting hormones is not an ethically neutral position and may have harmful effects in those transgender adolescents for whom it would be indicated.

NHS — Disregard for evidence

The statement went on to highlight that the current evidence base:

while still developing, includes a growing body of observational and longitudinal studies, alongside extensive clinical experience across specialized services. Limitations in the evidence are acknowledged; however, EPATH and WPATH are not aware of new evidence that would support a universal prohibition of these interventions.

Of course, the NHS has already shown its utter disregard for evidence supporting the efficacy of MAF hormones for trans youth. The Cass Review accepted just two studies on puberty blockers and hormones as ‘high-quality’ evidence.

For most of the 101 remaining studies that Cass discarded, she cited a lack of ‘blinding’ or a control group in her reasoning. This would involve not telling the participants what medication they were taking, and withholding medication from some.

Not only would this be hugely unethical, the visible effects of MAF hormones would render it impossible. Unsurprisingly, Cass lacked any experience working with trans youth whatsoever.

‘Robust and transparent methodologies’

Given that clear disregard for the scientific method, the joint statement understandably saw the need to:

underscore the importance of ensuring that evidence reviews informing policy are appraised using robust and transparent methodologies, and that their interpretation reflects the totality and context of available data.

In order to conclude that there was ‘no evidence’ or ‘weak evidence’ for the use of MAF hormones in under-18s, NHS England used a methodology that was anything but robust. Following Cass’ playbook, the NHS review used extraordinarily strict exclusion criteria to toss out 97% of all evidential studies.

Rather, the NHS chose to fragment its study into ten separate reviews. It searched only for reports focusing on estrogen monotherapy, testosterone monotherapy, GnRH analogues and estrogen, GnRH analogues and testosterone, GnRH analogue monotherapy.

It then divided each of these five criteria according to their focus on binary and non-binary participants. This is a level of specificity which very few existing studies are designed to accommodate.

This insistence on hyper-specificity is a data-fudging technique known as ‘salami slicing’. It’s known to encourage malpractice and is warned against specifically in the Cochrane Handbook — the ‘gold standard’ guide for systematic reviews.

Do No Harm

The joint statement added that:

Engagement from clinicians, researchers, methodological experts and including the values and preferences of the transgender population is essential in this process. Meanwhile, not providing hormones may also be harmful for those transgender youth who need it.

That harm is not a hypothetical. Back in February, the Good Law Project (GLP) published a freedom-of-information study which showed that suicides among trans youth spiked massively in 2021. That was immediately after the government issued a near-total ban on hormones and puberty blockers for young trans people.

This was particularly shocking given that, in 2024, the government put out an ‘independent’ review acknowledging just five suicides. As such, it callously dismissed the deaths as ‘statistically insignificant’.

However, thanks to the GLP, we now know of at least 22 deaths. At the time, the Canary wrote that:

22 young people took their own lives because their healthcare was suddenly ripped away by a bigoted, ideologically driven government.

NHS — Politics and ideology

In spite of those tragic deaths, the NHS is apparently hellbent on expanding its threat. And, as the WPATH joint statement concluded:

At a time of evolving evidence and clinical practice, EPATH and WPATH emphasize that policy decisions should be guided by scientific evaluation, clinical expertise, and a commitment to equitable access to appropriate care for trans and gender-diverse young people. Masculinizing and feminizing hormones have been part of the international transgender care treatment guidelines. They have been scientifically evaluated in transgender adults for over 5 decades, and in adolescents for over 3 decades.

Our national healthcare provider is flying directly in the face of decades of established international practice. It is no longer guided by reason or best-practice, but politics and transphobic ideology.

The NHS has chosen to centre a clear and overwhelming belief that a child growing into a trans adult is an unsatisfactory outcome — even at the cost of that child’s wellbeing; even at the cost of their life.

Featured image via Marbury / Getty

By Alex/Rose Cocker

Source link

Islamophobia — On Good Morning Britain (GMB), journalist Kevin Maguire confronted the fact that violence committed by white males never seems to see the same discriminatory attacks against them as a group.

In contrast, when any attack is perpetrated by a Black or Brown man, condemnation is made against entire communities. As a result, we have seen a growing number of racist white riots, whether that be in Southampton after the trial of Nowak’s killer or the thugs terrorising local residents in Belfast right now.

With Farage stating Southampton was “just the beginning”, supporting far-right efforts to bring more violence to UK streets under the guise of ‘protest’, a hierarchy of racism is on full view in our domestic politics which could have devastating consequences.

Given the fact that Met police chief Rowley couldn’t seem to stomach even saying the word ‘Islamophobia’ on Sky News this morning, this contrast in how little condemnation there is for white supremacist male violence is increasingly sickening.

Once again, Black and Brown people are facing potentially life-threatening violence with political leaders doing precious little to protect them.

Kevin Maguire: "After the attack on the Liverpool football parade & it was a white guy, middle class, former royal marine, no-one went after other white, middle class former marines & set this person represents that entire group" pic.twitter.com/3rleEKRGVL

— Saul Staniforth (@SaulStaniforth) June 10, 2026

When will we talk about our white male violence problem in the UK?

On GMB, Maguire points out how public outrage and media coverage don’t seem to correlate with offence — some cases blow up everywhere, while others barely get a mention. As a result, he helped to underscore the real deciding factor which contributes to any ensuing moral panic in the colour of the perpetrators skin.

However, this palpable refusal to confront the issue of white male violence, underscored by Maguire, inevitably raises concern that violent riots like this could inspire copycat attacks elsewhere in the UK, especially given how quickly far-right extremist ideas can spread and escalate online. This concern becomes intensified when we have a white supremacist billionaire tech giant like Elon Musk using his influence to incite hate and increase divisions.

Whereas white men are responsible for an increasing number of violent crimes in the UK which equally destroy lives. Thus, calling a spade a spade and confronting their radicalised behaviour could go a long way to improving safety in the UK for all its citizens.

For instance, when Sarah Everard was kidnapped, raped and murdered by serving Met Police officer Wayne Couzens, we did not see white men come out on the streets angry about male violence and femicide. It is worth noting, though, that peaceful vigils largely attended by women were treated as if they were criminal in themselves.

No, our patriarchal system will never allow a moral panic to ensue about white violence and abuse — even when it would undoubtedly serve to protect much of the country’s female population. 

Deplorably, racist Nigel Farage at the time called for people to be calm and for it not to lead to hate, which is a pretty stark contrast with his inciteful rhetoric after Black or Brown crimes occur:

When Metropolitan Police officer Wayne Couzens kidnapped and murdered Sarah Everard, Nigel Farage released a five-minute video urging people not to attack men or the police.

Today, in response to the murder of Henry Nowak, he called for "pure cold rage." pic.twitter.com/I1UdVbul9I

Advertisement

— Mukhtar (@I_amMukhtar) June 2, 2026

Sickening hypocrisy on full display

Similarly, we did not see any of this chaos and ‘concern’ following the sentencing of Chas Corrigan on 4th June. Corrigan is a 22-year-old white man from Cambridge who stabbed and murdered a 20-year-old male Saudi student. Mohammed Algasim was slashed in the neck whilst with friends outside his student accommodation and died from the attack.

However, you’d be forgiven for knowing little about this as comparatively, it has received nowhere near the same amount of coverage. It follows then to ask why, which isn’t a hard question to answer. Evidently, many British white men are racist, and until politicians, institutions, and community leaders confront that reality head-on, those views will continue to spread and harden.

But by failing to condemn racism clearly and consistently, the establishment only works to embolden it.

On the other hand, many politicians and commentators have rightfully called out the violence seen in Belfast as a racist pogrom and have condemned the perpetrators. Nevertheless, many public officials are still skirting around the real issue that is destabilising the UK and wreaking chaos, misery and fear on our streets — and that issue is white supremacism.

Just this morning, Sir Mark Rowley of the Met Police rightfully labelled the pogroms as “horrific” yet notably he couldn’t even say ‘Brown people’ or label the hate they have continually had to live alongside — Islamophobia. Instead, he once again brought the conversation back to antisemitism, whilst speaking of targeted homes and communities under attack in Belfast.

It is called Islamophobia — Say it.

Yet even after this anti-Muslim hatred leaves 18 homes destroyed and 70 people evacuated to temporary accommodation, he failed to show even a shadow of the same concern. This highlights the fact that UK officials consistently devote far more attention to some forms of racism than others, while treating violence against Brown communities as a mere afterthought.

Rather than address this rapidly growing threat of anti-Muslim hatred, white officials instead redirect public concern elsewhere, downplaying the dangers of Islamophobia while disproportionately amplifying antisemitism.

Meanwhile, white men — young and old — continue to escalate their behaviour, convincing themselves that intimidation, harassment, and violence amount to ‘legitimate’ acts of protest when they are obviously nothing of the sort.

Needless to say, you cannot tackle a problem you refuse to name. Yet UK and Western governments continue to meet anti-Muslim hatred with silence and indifference. Government officials and police chiefs must confront this now. If they choose not to, they will share responsibility for the violence that follows.

Every failure to challenge this fascist, supremacist hatred emboldens it — and brings us closer to tragedy.

Featured image via ITVX

By Maddison Wheeldon

Source link

Armed Forces Minister Al Carns has resigned over the government’s plans on defence spending. (Alamy)

3 min read39 min

Armed Forces Minister Al Carns has resigned over the government’s plans on defence spending and its Northern Ireland Legacy Bill, claiming “the deal this country makes with the people who serve it” is “broken”.

Advertisement

In a letter to the Prime Minister, the former marine said the proposed Defence Investment Plan (DIP) was not good enough, stating it “is neither transformative enough nor sufficiently funded”, adding that “a serious country funds its defence to meet the threat it actually faces, not the threat it wishes it faced”. 

“I have sat in the rooms, seen the assessments, and spoken to the commanders who will be asked to do more with less, and I cannot in good conscience stand at the dispatch box and defend a level of investment I know to be inadequate to the task,” wrote Carns.

Carns was also critical of the Northern Ireland Legacy Bill, describing it as “unfit for purpose” and that it currently “risks failing the very veterans it claims to protect”. 

Advertisement

“I set out the changes I believed were necessary, and the lines which I could not in good conscience go beyond,” he wrote. 

“Those lines have not been accepted. I have run out of room to argue this case honourably from inside government. A serving minister cannot ask fellow veterans to trust a process he no longer trusts himself.”

He also said “the machinery of government itself has been left to decay” and that “decisions that should take days, take months”. 

Advertisement

In his resignation letter Carns, who is reportedly prepared to run in a Labour leadership contest should one be triggered, gave a broader critique of the government, too. 

“Too many working people in this country feel insecure even when they are doing everything right,” he wrote

“They work hard, contribute, pay their taxes, and still feel one setback away from trouble. Public confidence in our institutions is weakening, and politics increasingly look performative while everyday life gets harder.”

His resignation comes hours after Defence Secretary John Healey resigned over the government’s defence spending plans,  saying he had been “left with no other option” after being presented with details of how much additional money the government was planning to spend on the Defence Investment Plan (DIP).

Advertisement

 “Without a DIP that meets the moment in this way, I am being forced to make decisions that would reduce the readiness of our Forces and increase the risk to personnel on operations, and could make the country less safe,” wrote Healey in his resignation letter. 

“After explaining to you that I would not be able to accept a DIP settlement that does not give our Forces the resources they need, I am now left with no other option than to submit my resignation as your Defence Secretary.”

In an interview with PoliticsHome, Lord Hutton, defence secretary between 2008 and 2009 under former Labour prime minister Gordon Brown, said Healey’s resignation was a “colossal failure of government”.

The former defence secretary said the government would need to combine borrowing with spending cuts, including welfare, to fund the necessary increase to defence spending – stating he was “utterly frustrated” the government seemed “completely unable to address” the issue.

Advertisement

The departure of Carns from government so soon after Healey’s will pile further pressure on Prime Minister Keir Starmer, as the embattled Prime Minister attempts to keep his government together ahead of next week’s by-election which could see Labour Manchester mayor Andy Burnham elected to parliament in Makerfield. 

Burnham, who has made no secret of his leadership ambitions, admitted on the BBC’s Question Time last week that he would run in any Labour leadership contest – accusing Wes Streeting, who resigned as Health Secretary last month over Starmer’s leadership and heavy by-election losses, of starting the contest already. 

Source link

‘Big Ben Dan’ Day has been found guilty of ‘public nuisance’ at Southwark Crown Court after climbing the parliamentary tower in March 2025. Day’s 17-hour protest was against Israel’s Gaza genocide and against state-sanctioned police violence against peaceful protest.

Big Ben Dan — “Serious disruption”

The state claims Day caused a £67,000 public bill, some lost bus fares and “serious disruption”. Not as big as Israel’s genocide has caused to millions of innocent Palestinians and surely that’s the point of protest. But that’s the UK state’s priority as Keir Starmer wages war on anti-genocide speech and protest.

Supporters chanted “Free Palestine” outside the court throughout the hearing. Day will be sentenced on 27 July. So far no indication has been given that he will be sentenced as a terrorist, as the state is likely to do to other anti-genocide protesters tomorrow, 12 June 2026. However, nothing should be ruled out as Starmer continues to protect Israel from scrutiny and resistance.

Public bleeding

The court was told that Day had bled on the tower’s stone because he had taken his shoes off for the climb. ‘Bleeding on a public building’ is not listed as a criminal offence, at least yet. Just as well, given the unprovoked police violence Day was highlighting.

Jurors also heard that Day said:

We’re being violently attacked by police for peaceful protest. That’s why I’m taking action at the so-called hub of democracy today.

It’s unclear how this was meant to be incriminating.

Spare a thought

The CPS’s Claire Campbell said afterward that the “fundamental right” to protest isn’t allowed to cause “serious public disruption”. Assuming she votes, perhaps she’ll spare a thought for the Suffragettes and their campaign next time she’s at the ballot box. That included very serious disruption, including widespread window-smashing and even the planting of bombs, as well as the death of a protester under the hoofs of the king’s racehorse.

Featured image via Dan Kitwood/Getty Images

By Skwawkbox

Source link

US oil exports are surging as Saudi and Russian exports are disrupted by US-led wars and sanctions — but, there is a big ‘but’ here, the true and permanent winner of Trump’s Iran war might be China’s clean-tech industry.

Exports of Chinese-made solar cells hit 1.7bn units in March, a record high for a single month, the Financial Times reported.

Trump’s Iran war has propelled China’s cleantech industry https://t.co/cme8pBMfew

— Financial Times (@FT) June 11, 2026

Demand in March and April was led by Southeast Asia and Africa, highlighting “how swaths of the oil-dependent developing world have emerged as key markets for low-cost Chinese renewable energy technologies.”

Asia and Africa leading the change — from oil to renewable

Germany’s DW noted that renewable initiatives since US/Israel/UK war on Iran include but are not limited to:

• Indonesia — The president called the crisis a “wakeup call for electrification” and announced that motorcycles need to switch to electric.
• Vietnam — The country’s largest conglomerate, Vingroup, cancelled its largest LNG-fired power plant project and is replacing it with renewables.
• Philippines — Announced big solar pledges in response to the energy shock.
• South Korea — Announced big solar pledges as part of its energy security push.

All of this renewable infrastructure will largely be purchased from China, which manufactures roughly 90% of the world’s solar panels and dominates wind turbines, batteries, and EV supply chains, DW said.

DW interviewed Sam Geall, associate fellow at Chatham House, who emphasized the lower risk involved in renewable energy systems:

But I will say that there is a difference between fossil fuel energy imports and renewable energy systems in so far as you can’t actually blockade the sun. You can’t blockade the wind. Once you build out these systems, they do provide greater resilience from the kind of entanglements and volatility associated with imported fossil fuels.

In other words, unlike oil tankers or gas pipelines, sunlight and wind cannot be cut off by foreign powers, military conflict, or blocked shipping lanes.

This means good news for China’s electricity output and clean technology exports, which had already scaled record highs in 2025.

Scam or opportunity of the century

The Wall Street Journal said that despite Trump branding wind and solar power “the scam of the century.” One outcome of his Iran war will be increased demand for Chinese solar panels and wind turbines. This is an unlikely legacy for a president who promised to unleash American fossil fuels— “drill, baby, drill.”

FT cited data from Mission Possible Partnership, which showed nineteen clean industry projects globally reached final investment decisions in the past six months, more than double the rate recorded a year earlier.

Of these projects more than two-thirds are in China.

US is currently benefiting from their destablization of oil production in Middle East, Russia and South America.

WSJ noted Trump saying that “countries should respond to Middle East uncertainty by buying more American oil and natural gas. “We have plenty,” he said in early April.”

Trump is calling renewables the scam,  not his destabilisation-led increase in US oil exports.

But the evidence is suggesting — destabilisation will also lead to long-term reality demand destruction for oil.

Featured image via Scott Olson/Getty Images

By Nandita Lal

Source link

US defence secretary Pete Hegseth openly threatened Cuba during a visit to the colonial military base at Guantanamo Bay. Hegseth told a captive audience of American soldiers that Cuba had better not try and get long-range weapons. The US has been ramping up threats against the island state.

Meanwhile, US officials have forced Colombia’s left-wing president Gustavo Petro not to meet New York mayor Zohran Mamdani.

The Guardian reported on 10 June that Hegseth said:

It would be unwise for the government of Cuba to try to procure or get access to the types of weapons that could reach this base or the American homeland.

They would be inviting the kind of confrontation not only do they not want, but they could not stand.

Advertisement

Adding:

What happens with the future of Cuba is in the hands of … the president of the United States and the leadership of Cuba.

The US is currently busy getting an arse-kicking from Iran. But Trump has made clear he wants to dominate the Americas.

Hegseth, a Trump sycophant best known for his far-right tattoos and blustering style, has overseen military activities across the continent. Guantanamo Bay was a fitting location for laying out colonial ambitions. The base there was the first US imperial outpost, stolen in 1898.

It later became famous as America’s lawless gulag for War on Terror prisoners.

Mamdani meeting cancelled under US pressure

Colombia’s left-wing president Gustavo Petro has run into the authoritarian impulses of the US state. And not for the first time…

The socialist leader had his visa revoked in autumn 2025 after attending a Palestine demonstration where he called for US troops to disobey their leaders. Petro is back in the US but the New York Times reported on 11 June 2026:

A meeting scheduled for this week between President Gustavo Petro of Colombia and Mayor Zohran Mamdani of New York was called off after U.S. diplomats told Colombia’s government that the move could violate the terms under which Mr. Petro was being permitted to enter the United States.

Adding:

The U.S. State Department canceled Mr. Petro’s visa last fall, and he only had a limited travel allowance to attend a U.N. Security Council Meeting on Wednesday — any other activities outside that meeting were not allowed.

His own officials reportedly agreed to cancel a planned meeting with NY mayor Zohran Mamdani. The State Department said:

As the secretary has said, a visa is a privilege not a right. Any individual’s U.S. visa is at risk of revocation if they visit America and outrageously implore U.S. soldiers to disobey orders of the duly elected president of the United States.

Adding:

Despite President Trump’s efforts to find common ground, the same individual continues with this kind of behavior.

We don’t know about you, but Petro sounds like quite a lad. The NYT said US secretary of state Marco Rubio might be behind the threats. Rubio is a Cuban-American Trumpian with a bee in his bonnet about Cuba roughly the size of the island itself.

Cuba — Trump’s bleak continental plans

Donald Trump has made it very clear he plans to bring the Americas to heel. The Canary has reported on his activities and aims since he returned to power in January 2026.

The US wants to ensure:

the Western Hemisphere remains reasonably stable and well-governed enough to prevent and discourage mass migration to the United States.

And that those pliable governments:

cooperate with us against narco-terrorists, cartels, and other transnational criminal organizations.

Trump and his cronies desire:

a Hemisphere that remains free of hostile foreign incursion or ownership of key assets, and that supports critical supply chains.

Decoded, the US seeks to control the markets in the Americas, and:

we want to ensure our continued access to key strategic locations. In other words, we will assert and enforce a “Trump Corollary” to the Monroe Doctrine.

This process is underway today, even as the Trump administration tries to escape the mire of its illegal war in Iran.

The CIA reportedly killed a mid-level cartel boss with a car bomb in Mexico City in March. That followed a US-backed cartel shootout in Mexico, also in March. Two CIA officers were killed after a drug lab raid in April. Official denials followed those reports.

US-backed troops in Ecuador allegedly tortured dairy workers and blew up a farm in March. Cuba, naturally, is on the regime change list too. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) paramilitaries are carrying out a racist war on poor, maligned and undocumented workers on the home front.

Trump wants a pliable ‘homeland empire’ in the western hemisphere. When the war on Iran ends it seems probable his gaze will turn back to the Americas fully. Those of us who oppose empire need to be fully engaged with what is happening there.

Featured image via Ezra Acayan/Getty Images

By Joe Glenton

Source link

The Green Party did well in the 2026 local elections, especially in London. In Ealing, for example, it got five new councillors. But if it had worked together with local left-wing independents, the borough could have gained at least 14 extra progressive councillors, pulling significant power away from Labour. Instead, Labour kept control.

Indy-Green collaboration could make a massive difference in Ealing

In the local elections, the Green Party focused on the less diverse and more expensive Hanwell Broadway ward. All three of its candidates defeated Labour there. Ealing Community Independents (ECI) candidates, meanwhile, stood in poorer and more diverse wards, and were particularly strong in and around Southall.

ECI spoke to the Greens before the election and “agreed not to stand in three of their highest priority wards” (like Hanwell Broadway), leader Craig Smith told us previously. But in the vast majority of wards where ECI candidates were actively campaigning, Smith said, the Greens put up paper candidates who did no visible campaigning.

The result of vote splitting in most of these wards was a Labour victory.

ECI did better than the Greens in:

• Dormers Wells. Here, a combination of the top ECI and Green votes would have beaten two of Labour’s winning candidates.
• Southall Broadway. This was as close as ECI got to beating Labour, and ECI was its main left-wing challenger. If Green votes had gone to ECI, the ward would now have at least one ECI councillor.
• Southall Green. ECI’s candidates all got more than a thousand votes each, and could have overtaken at least one of Labour’s winning candidates if Green voters had opted for ECI.
• Southall West. Again, a combination of ECI and Green votes could have defeated at least one Labour candidate.

If there had been an agreement to combine campaign strengths and work together, it probably wouldn’t have just benefited ECI either. The Greens could potentially have gained even more councillors too. Because if ECI votes had gone to the Greens in the following wards, the two could have beaten numerous Labour candidates:

• Northfields. Green paper candidates all got over a thousand votes each. And if there’d been a deal with ECI, a combination of each party’s votes would have beaten all three Labour candidates.
• South Acton. The same was true here. Again, a cooperative campaign could have wiped the floor with Labour.
• Perivale. A joint campaign could have beaten at least one Labour candidate.
• Greenford Broadway. The same was true here. The ward could’ve had one extra progressive councillor.
• Norwood Green. ECI and the Greens both had clear support here, and together they could have elected at least one councillor.

In total, an ECI-Green deal could have secured the election of 14 extra left-wing councillors in Ealing.

Whether it was a central diktat from Green Party HQ or something else that prevented an ECI-Green agreement, it was a tanking Labour that reaped the benefits and local people who suffered. In one ward, for example, people are still feeling the consequences of a Green paper candidate accidentally winning.

By-election following ‘paper candidate’ resignation

In May’s local election, North Acton ward was a straight battle between Labour and the Greens (partly because ECI didn’t stand). Greens didn’t actively campaign in the ward, though. And after a paper candidate actually won, he quickly resigned. This sparked a by-election, which will take place on 25 June.

The local Green Party, whose candidate will be Marijn van de Geer, has promised:

we will be running a full campaign to try and keep the seat.

However, as a response to the Green Party’s controversial habit of standing paper candidates, ECI has decided to put up a challenge in North Acton. Craig Smith himself will be standing as the ECI candidate. And he told the Canary why, explaining that:

Every candidate that Ealing Community Independents puts up for election is serious about wanting to fight for the rights of local people and vulnerable communities. Every one of us has a track record in community organising, local activism and trade unionism.

The other parties are playing political games with the lives of North Acton residents: the Greens don’t deserve a second go in a by-election caused by their accidental councillor resigning after just 10 days; Ealing Labour are desperate to get their former chief whip re-elected despite residents rejecting him elsewhere in the borough on May 7.

North Acton deserves better than politics as usual. Ealing Community Independents is a serious local movement, with a serious local candidate focused on everyday life in North Acton – not party games that revolve around Westminster.

He added that ECI had approached the Greens ahead of the by-election to discuss a potential deal, but without success:

For this by-election, once again Ealing Community Independents tried to reach agreement with the local Green Party. The Greens – having inadvertently caused the by-election by fielding a paper candidate on May 7 who resigned immediately after getting elected – could have sat out this by-election in favour of a serious, progressive alternative in the shape of Ealing Community Independents. We will continue to try to reach agreement for future election cycles with the local Green Party, but our efforts have so far been unsuccessful.

North Acton “is not getting a fair deal”

Speaking about the local issues in North Acton, Smith said:

North Acton is undergoing massive and rapid change – the terminus area for HS2, home to Old Oak Common Development Corporation, and data centres appearing all over Park Royal.

Billions of pounds in investment are pouring into the area – but where are the new GP appointments, school places and community facilities? Residents see cranes everywhere, but the community is not getting a fair deal; they are living through rapid urban change, intense housing pressure, high renter turnover, construction disruption, transport pressure and concerns around safety and cleanliness.

All this means a new kind of fight – not against development, but for development that genuinely serves the interests of ordinary people living in the area. And a new kind of fight needs a new kind of local politics.

For him, this means a vote for Ealing Community Independents.

The Greens, on the other hand, will hope to convince local voters to give them a second chance.

Whatever happens in the by-election, though, one thing is clear from Ealing’s local elections. The fewer deals Greens make with left-wing independents, the fewer progressives there’ll be in government, and the longer Labour (or other right-wing parties) will be able to keep hold of power.

Featured image via AsianStandard

By Ed Sykes

Source link

On 21 April, illegal settler and head of Homesh “religious school”, Schmuel Wendy, shot dead two Palestinians outside al Mughayyir boy’s School, in the occupied West Bank. One was a 13-year-old pupil. There have been numerous claims that Wendy is the killer, but he denies even being in the village at the time. But the Canary spoke to various people who were at the school that day to find out more.

Schmuel Wendy, illegal settler and head of Homesh “religious school” fired shots at uniformed Palestinian Red Crescent Society Paramedic

Al Mughayyir experiences daily raids by the occupation’s military, and violent attacks by settlers who live in any one of the nine illegal outposts surrounding the village. So two of our sources have requested anonymity, for fear of reprisals.

Israeli occupation forces (IOF) are often stationed at the entrance to al Mughayyir, which is close to the boy’s school. They restrict residents’ movements and generally terrorise them in whichever ways they wish.

A Palestinian Red Crescent Society (PRSC) volunteer, tells us he had been visiting the school regularly, for days before the two residents of al Mughayyir were shot This was due to regular and escalating problems there, caused by the IOF. He says:

On the day of the shooting, armed settlers came and sat behind the olive trees, about 200 metres from here. The children in school saw them through their classroom windows, and started screaming and shouting. I went and talked with the settlers, to tell them to go away. But they just started swearing and cussing at me. Schmuel Wendy was there. I thought he was a soldier, not a settler, because he was wearing military uniform. So I thought I could talk with him, and get them all to leave. But I was wrong. He went to the ground and fired two bullets in my direction, even though I was wearing my paramedic uniform. The bullets just missed me and hit the wall behind. I then went back to the school doors, which the principal had already shut, to go and protect the children.

There were two West Bank settlers in army uniform and four masked occupation soldiers. All were armed

Waheed Abu Naim is the Principal’s assistant, and an English teacher at the school. On the day of the attack, students rushed into his classroom from outside, to tell him some settlers were near to the wall of the school. He says:

It was about 12 when I left my class and went over to the settlers. There was a small short wall between me and them. There were 2 settlers wearing old-looking army uniform. Four military soldiers stood behind them, in uniform and wearing masks to hide their faces. The six of them were together, and all had long guns. I stood behind that wall to talk to them. I asked the settler who was in front, why he was here. He told me “Leave this place. Go back”. I then spoke to the military soldiers in English, telling them to take their settlers and go. One of the soldiers went in front of the settlers, raising his gun towards me. He was just four metres away, and told me I had to leave and go back to my school. Then I understood they wanted to make a crime. I quickly tried to take all the students inside, before danger arrived.

One al Mughayyir resident, whose nephew is a pupil at the school, told us he wasted no time when he learnt settlers and the army were there.

‘You need to go home, because today I intend to kill someone’

He arrived to help protect the children and bring them home. He tells us:

I saw Waheed, the English teacher, talking to the soldiers, so I joined him. Wendy was one of the settlers. He was armed and in semi military uniform. He told me, in Hebrew: “You need to go home, because today I’m intending to kill someone.

In the time it took for Abu Naim to take two pupils inside and then come back outside for the others, Wendy had opened fire on al Mughayyir residents.

Abu Naim says he is in no doubt it was Wendy who killed that day. He says:

We know this shooter, Schmuel Wendy, very well. For 2 years he has been coming many times to our camps where my uncle’s family keep sheep, in the nearby al Khaleel area. He used to go there to attack and raise his gun towards them, to shout and push them. The aim was to scare them and their children. As soon as I talked to him I knew who he was, because he comes by many times and has a settlement close to the village. That time he came with four soldiers.

Abu Naim continues:

The bullets hit the wall first, then he shot one of our students, Aws, who was outside. He fell down on his face. We turned him over, and saw the bullet in the front of his head. There was a lot of blood coming from Aws’ mouth and nose, and it is still on the ground today. We carried him to my car. When I was about to drive to Abu Falah medical centre, in the neighbouring village, I was called to take another injured person. We arrived within five minutes, but the doctor told us we had lost Aws.

Aws was a danger to no one, but the intention was shoot to kill him

The 45 year old PRCS volunteer, has been working with the Red Crescent for more than 10 years. He tells the Canary:

Aws was a danger to no one. But the intention was to shoot to kill. They did not shoot him in his legs, or somewhere else to injure him. Instead, they pointed at his head, to kill him. They want to intimidate and scare us, to the point where we will never feel safe. During the shooting, a military vehicle stopped by the school entrance and asked me what was going on. I told the army “What do you mean what is going on? The settlers are shooting at us.” The soldier said, “I don’t care. You have five minutes to evacuate the whole school. The police are coming and they will deal with this.” It wasn’t even five minutes before tear gas was fired at us.

The al Mughayyir resident told us he was doing his best to protect the children from the shooting and teargas.

There was a man on the ground, who had fainted because of the gas. He had come to protect the students. Me and Jihad, Waheed’s brother, took him to a safe place. Then we tried to evacuate the children from the area, and went to higher ground to protect them. Everything was chaotic, everyone was shouting, and there was a lot of tear gas. To our surprise, we saw that the shooter was Schmuel Wendy, head of the Homesh religious school. At the moment we noticed him, we were in his line of fire. As I shouted at Jihad to leave, someone yelled that he was injured. The shooting was continuous, and shrapnel hit my leg. Me and another guy pulled Jihad about 10 metres, so he was out of the firing line, and carried him about 200 metres to the nearest car. We drove to Abu Falah medical centre, and when we arrived we learnt that Aws had already been martyred.

Wendy ran out of bullets, so he took a new magazine from Israeli occupation soldiers, and then shot dead Jihad Abu Naim

Jihad Abu Naim had been working in Turmus Ayya, a village 8km from al Mughayyir. When he heard what was happening he drove to the village, to help rescue the students. But he was shot in the right side of his chest, by zionist killer Schmuel Wendy. Waheed was unaware at the time that his brother had been shot and killed.

He told the Canary:

While I was at the medical centre, my father called me to say Jihad was arriving. I thought he was bringing someone from our village who was injured. But when the car arrived, I found my brother inside. The doctor said there was still a pulse, and started pushing his chest to get him breathing again, but it didn’t work. So, they put him inside the ambulance to go to Ramallah hospital. He died on the way. On that day Wendy continued shooting for more than 20 minutes. After we took the second injury to Abu Falah, he ran out of bullets so went down and took a new magazine from the pocket of one of the military soldiers. Then he shot my brother.

The martyrs and injured were evacuated that day using cars belonging to villagers, as the IOF prevented ambulances from entering the village.The al Mughayyir resident says:

Ambulances were at the village entrance. But when we left the village we knew the injuries were serious, so preferred to keep going using private cars, so we didn’t waste any time. The ambulances were near the soldiers anyway, and they would have abducted our injured people. I really think this day was preplanned. At the same time as the shooting, the IOF had also blocked the nearby village of Silwad, so ambulances couldn’t leave there for al Mughayyir.

West Bank — Two killed and three injured by bullets, two injured by tear gas

According to the PRCS volunteer, there were also three gunshot injuries that day. A 16-year-old student was shot in the hand, while a man in his 30s helping to evacuate the children was shot in the abdomen. The third injured person was 60-year-old man. He was sitting in front of the army, just observing. He was shot at very close range, and a bullet went through his thigh, from one side to the other. Two people also suffered from tear gas suffocation, one was pregnant.

This school attack was the first by settlers. But those carried out by the IOF occur on a very regular basis and involve the use of tear gas and sound bombs on al Mughayyir’s school and its pupils. The school, which has around 450 children, is the only boy’s school in the village, so is extremely important. School Principal, Bassam Abu Assaf tells us:

The attacks here are not acceptable. If we were to let children leave from the main gate that day, many more students would have been lost. The wall here is full of bullets.

There is one motive for these continued attacks — to worry parents and pupils enough that children will stop attending school. Their education will then suffer greatly.

Students in the West Bank have the right to study in safety

But Abu Assaf and his team are determined to ensure students will not miss out on their education, and the school will remain open. He says:

Now we are helping pupils more and more to complete their higher education. We do not allow any of the students to leave, as it is the only school. All of us need our chance to live in peace, and complete our higher education in a safe environment. This is a right of all students all over the world. Palestinian people refuse violence, and want to live like any other people in the world, without attacks.

It is almost two months after 13-year-old Aws Hamdi al-Naasan and Jihad Marzouk Abu Naim were martyred. But no one has been held accountable. Every day, Waheed Abu Naim looks out of his classroom window to see a Palestinian flag flying on the nearby hilltop. It marks the spot where his brother was shot and killed. The community is still grieving.

Yet despite the intentional killings, multiple injuries, and numerous eyewitness accounts, there have been no arrests or meaningful investigations. We must bring an end to the system in which attacks on Palestinians can take place in broad daylight, in front of a school in the occupied West Bank. All while the Zionist colonisers who terrorise these Palestinian communities escape with no consequences whatsoever.

Choice of 3 featured images:

1. Flag on hill marking where Jihad was martyred
2. Overview of school area
3. School

Featured image via Paula Bronstein/Getty Images

By Charlie Jaay

Source link