Politics
Perez Hilton’s Condition Is ‘Serious But Stable’ After Self-Harm Livestream Incident
This article contains discussions of self-harm.
Perez Hilton’s family has given an update on the celebrity blogger following his recent hospitalisation.
Last week, police officers were called to Perez’s home in Miami in the wake of a TikTok livestream in which he appeared to be self-harming.
The former Celebrity Big Brother housemate – whose legal name is Mario Lavandeira – was then taken to a nearby hospital for medical treatment where he has remained since.
In a statement posted on his blog over the weekend, his loved ones said that his condition remains “serious but stable”, noting that he has a long recovery ahead as a result of the injuries he sustained during what they previously described as a “severe mental health crisis” that resulted in him “harming himself”.
“Perez’s condition remains serious but stable,” they wrote. “He experienced significant blood loss and sustained additional injuries that will require surgery in the coming days.
“His treatment and recovery will be a long process. We are grateful that Perez was able to spend time with his mother and sister yesterday.
“As our family remains focused on Perez’s treatment and recovery, we also need the space and privacy to care for everyone affected by this situation.”
The family noted that Perez’s “communication has been extremely limited and confined to immediate family, medical providers, and others directly involved in his care” insisting he “has not communicated with the media or issued any public statements”.
At the end of their statement, they reiterated that there is “absolutely no reason for members of the media or the public to remain outside the family’s home” requesting “members of the media to leave the home and surrounding area, stop following family members, and cease photographing Perez’s children”.
It was also pointed out that Perez’s own blog has “maintained a ‘no kids policy’” for the last decade, requesting privacy for his own three children, who are aged 13, 12 and eight.
Before that, the family’s most recent statement had said that their “highest priority right now is helping the children begin to heal from what they experienced” following what was referred to as the “livestream incident”.
They noted that his children, niece and sister had been at his home before the livestream got underway, but “immediately fled to protect the children from witnessing any further trauma” when it “became clear that Perez was experiencing a severe mental health crisis and harming himself”.
Perez first rose to notoriety in the mid-2000s thanks to his celebrity news blog, where he frequently generated controversy due to his blunt, and often disparaging, commentary on the public figures he covered.
In the 2010s, he insisted that he’d be changing the tone of his reporting, telling Ellen Degeneres on her daytime show that he wanted to “be part of the solution and not part of the problem”, after being called out by numerous celebrities for “bullying”.
He later claimed to the New York Times: “What’s important for me is not being liked, but it is that people think I am no longer toxic to the world.”
Since the beginning of this year, Perez has experienced a number of health struggles, having been hospitalised with severe sepsis back in March.
In the months that followed, he shared that he’d been hospitalised for a second time due to deep vein thrombosis.
Help and support:
- Mind, open Monday to Friday, 9am-6pm on 0300 123 3393.
- Samaritans offers a listening service which is open 24 hours a day, on 116 123 (UK and ROI – this number is FREE to call and will not appear on your phone bill).
- CALM (the Campaign Against Living Miserably) offer a helpline open 5pm-midnight, 365 days a year, on 0800 58 58 58, and a webchat service.
- The Mix is a free support service for people under 25. Call 0808 808 4994 or email help@themix.org.uk
- Rethink Mental Illness offers practical help through its advice line which can be reached on 0808 801 0525 (Monday to Friday 10am-4pm). More info can be found on rethink.org.
Politics
Dwayne Johnson Reacts To Live-Action Moana Remake Reviews
Dwayne Johnson has shrugged off the lukewarm response to the recent live-action remake of Moana as “just the way it goes”.
The Rock originated the role of Maui in Disney’s modern animated classic Moana, a character he also portrayed in the live-action remake, which hit cinemas earlier in the summer.
However, it’s fair to say that the new take on the beloved film (on which he also served as an executive producer) didn’t quite grab critics or audiences the same way, with many reviews calling out the movie’s appearance and branding it a “soulless” cash-grab.
“Our first two reviews came out [and] I’ll never forget it… They were amazing,” Johnson recalled to People magazine. “I was like, ‘wow’.”
Then, he claimed, things “went another way… as sometimes happens”.
He then conceded: “That’s just the way it goes because we’re in this business.”
“If you love it, great. If you don’t, no problem,” Johnson added of his latest film, adding that, to him, “what really mattered” was that “the culture really stood up”.
At the time of writing, the 2026 take on Moana holds an unenviable 38% critical score on the reviews aggregation site Rotten Tomatoes, while it holds an average score of 2.7 stars from Letterboxd users.
One part of the new Moana movie that had people talking before the film had even been released was the long wig the usually-bald star wore in order to bring Maui to life in live-action form.
“I laughed so fucking hard, when we first came out and people saw me in a wig for the first time, and they memed me,” he claimed last month.
“The internet did the internet. It was very, very funny. I was like, ‘OK, it’s alright, just see the movie, wait till you see it’.”
Moana is still in cinemas now.
Politics
Farage reportedly called by-election on false information
Nigel Farage’s decision to call a by-election in Clacton confused everyone. People speculated that he forced the race to draw attention away from his many ongoing financial scandals. The problem with this theory is that the by-election actually drew more attention to Farage and his numerous controversies.
Now, according to the Times, there may actually be a good reason for why he called the by-election. The problem is this ‘good reason’ ended up being a very bad one because Farage reportedly called the by-election on the understanding that it would permanently halt a parliamentary investigation. This is not the case, and as everyone now knows, the investigation will resume once he returns as an MP (should he beat Count Binface).
Farage receives questionable advice
Reportedly, a “senior source” in Reform revealed that Farage received bad advice from his advisors. This is a problem for Farage, as it suggests the people he relies on for advice aren’t up to the task. The leak also provides further evidence that the party has competing factions which are working against one another.
The parliamentary investigation in question related to a £5 million ‘gift’ Farage accepted in 2024. As we previously reported:
Farage accepted the £5m gift from Harborne – a crypto billionaire – in 2024. At the time, he’d said he wouldn’t run in the general election, but this changed after he received the £5m. The problem is that after he became an MP, he was supposed to declare any ‘registrable benefits’ from the previous 12 months. Farage did not declare the £5m, and now it looks like he was purposefully trying to hide it.
Farage defended not declaring the gift because he wasn’t a politician at the time when he received it. As noted, this defence doesn’t hold up because incoming MPs have to declare all potentially relevant donations, benefits, and gifts from the previous 12 months. The gift does seem to be potentially relevant too, as Farage went on to shill for the crypto industry after taking money from crypto billionaire Harborne.
It also later emerged that Farage had seemingly agreed to return to politics before accepting the gift, adding to the evidence that the cash lump sum was political. Add to this the fact that Farage reportedly spoke about wanting £1 million a year to return to politics (and he then received a £5 million gift just before the start of a new five-year parliamentary period).
What will the future hold for Reform’s leader?
It’s pretty much certain that Farage will win in Clacton. However, should the parliamentary investigation find him guilty of misconduct, he could face a second Clacton by-election this year; one in which the other parties will definitely run against him.
Although Farage may cling on again, this pantomime has clearly damaged his national standing, even if he does remain Clacton’s politician of choice.
Featured image via Marcus Yam
By Willem Moore
Politics
Britney Spears Reshares Video Claiming Her Mum Lynne ‘Failed’ Her
Britney Spears has reposted a video suggesting that her mother Lynne “failed” her.
On Sunday evening, a post on Britney’s X account linked out to a video from YouTube personality and pop culture commentator Julia Boateng, from what was described as her “‘stage mum’ series”.
“Really cool fans sent this to me… pretty interesting!” the …Baby One More Time singer’s post read, while seven hours later, a screenshot was shared from the same verified account, alongside the message: “Find the video!!!!! Extremely interesting words coming from this brilliant lady…”
In her introduction, Julia suggested: “I feel like Britney grew up in a family where performing well, keeping the peace and being useful was central and integral to her security. And Britney’s talent really became her family’s pathway to a better life, and I feel like Lynne repeatedly blurred the lines in supporting her daughter and depending on her.”
“This video is specifically taking a look at Lynne Spears, a figure in the Spears family that I feel like is talked about but not talked about nearly as much as [Britney’s dad] Jamie Spears, [sister] Jamie Lynne or any other family [member] or entity around them,” she continued.
Meanwhile, an official YouTube synopsis for the 27-minute video argued: “Lynne Spears has always been positioned as the ‘good parent’ in the Britney Spears story[. She’s thought of as] supportive, sidelined, sympathetic.
“But a closer look at her role in Britney Spears’ [conservatorship] tells a more complicated story. This video breaks down Lynne Spears’ relationship with Jamie Spears, her ties to [conservatorship] figures Lou Taylor and Sam Lutfi, her own memoir Through the Storm, and what her actions (and inactions) reveal once you follow the money and the timeline.”
Days earlier, Britney had shared another lengthy post on X criticising her parents, accusing them of keeping her from her two sons when she was still under the legal conservatorship put in place by her father in the late 2000s.
In the post, Britney also admitted that she felt she’d “failed as a mother” when one of her sons told her that he didn’t “personally believe in God”.
Following a high-profile legal battle, Britney’s conservatorship came to an end in 2021, with the Grammy winner having since spoken out against her mother, father and other family members on numerous occasions over their supposed part in the arrangement.
She also put forward her side of the story in her memoir The Woman In Me, which was released in 2023, chronicling her rise to fame, the many headline-grabbing moments she was part of during her time in the spotlight and, of course, the conservatorship that cast a shadow over the latter years of her career.
In 2022, Lynne wrote on Instagram: “Britney, your whole life I have tried my best to support your dreams and wishes! And also, I have tried my best to help you out of hardships. I have never and will never turn my back on you!”
“I hurt for you that you feel the people who love you the most betrayed you!” she previously said. “Let me come to you! I love you!”
A video posted by Lynne at the end of July saw her insisting that she loves “every bit of” her life, despite the “ups and downs” she and her family have faced.
Earlier this year, Britney checked into a rehab facility after being pulled over by the police and arrested while out driving in California, for which she was later convicted of dangerous driving.
Politics
Ex-US Ambassador: Netanyahu In ‘Political Fight Of His Life’
Benjamin Netanyahu is in the “political fight of his life” right now, according to a former US ambassador.
The Israeli prime minister rejected Donald Trump’s 15-point Gaza peace plan on Sunday, delivering a major blow to the US president.
Netanyahu said his country’s troops will not withdraw from the Palestinian region until Hamas has been “genuinely” disarmed.
His remarks come weeks after Trump’s Board of Peace announced its pathway to finally end the conflict between Israel and the Palestinian militants.
David Satterfield, the ex-US special envoy for Middle East humanitarian issues, told BBC Radio 4 that Netanyahu had delayed his response to the proposals because he is stuck in a “dilemma” right now.
The American diplomat said the Israeli leader is torn between following domestic opinion and keeping the US president on side.
“He is in the political fight of his life. In many ways, it’s a personal fight as well, given the implications on the outcome of his court trial,” Satterfield told the Today programme.
A trial against Netanyahu began in 2020 over charges of bribery, fraud and breach of trust. He denies any wrongdoing.
Israel is facing a general election this October, too, and Netanyahu is running once again.
Satterfield continued: “He doesn’t want to do anything – whether it’s Gaza, Lebanon, Syria – that has any impact on his nationalist base, his right-wing coalition.
“He’s not going to support any kind of forward-leaning plan on Gaza.
“On the other hand, he doesn’t want to offend Donald Trump.”
The US is Israel’s strongest ally and Netanyahu called the American president a “great friend” on Sunday.
However, Netanyahu has also faced criticism from within Israel for supposedly allowing Trump to dictate what the country does.
Satterfield, previously the US ambassador to Turkey, continued: “Donald Trump – should he ever come out openly in opposition to prime minister Netanyahu that is beyond comments the president has made in the past – that in itself would have a very very negative impact on the prime minister’s political chances.
“He’s caught between the two. It was that dilemma that produced his long delay [in responding to the peace plan].”
A senior diplomat who is hoping to implement Trump’s peace proposals, Nickolay Mladenov, responded by saying discussions were ongoing in the hope of a “positive outcome”.
Satterfield also claimed that the White House has informally acknowledged Netanyahu is in a political campaign right now and was therefore offering up “rhetoric”.
He suggested the Israeli leader had offered some concessions to Trump by cutting back on his recent attacks in the hope of “mitigating displeasure from the president” – while simultaneously staking out a position which will please his nationalist base.
“Israel has to take credible and real steps to show they’re serious about the withdrawal from the 60-70% of Gaza they now control,” Satterfield said.
“It’s going to be very hard for the Israeli side. It’s going to be very hard for Hamas to accept as well.”
Listen to Commons People, the podcast that makes politics easy. Every week, Kevin Schofield and Kate Nicholson unpack the week’s biggest stories to keep you informed. Join us for straightforward analysis of what’s going on at Westminster.
Politics
Taylor Swift’s August Removed From Donald Trump Team TikTok Post
The fan-favourite Taylor Swift song August has disappeared from a recent controversial social media post from Donald Trump’s team.
“I’m sure Taylor Swift is going to be super excited we used her song!” they captioned the post.
However, while the Grammy-winning singer never commented publicly on Trump’s video, in the days that followed, the musical accompaniment was removed from the post.
Per The Independent and Entertainment Weekly, TikTok app users in the US can now see a message on @TeamTrump’s August post that “the copyright owner hasn’t made this sound available in your country”.
Politics
Trump Furiously Backpedals On 1 Of His Central ‘Vandalism’ Claims
President Donald Trump on Sunday once again blamed vandalism for the botched renovation of the Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool – but also made a startling confession about the evidence.
Or, rather, the lack of evidence.
“There was substantial other damage to the Reflecting Pool, also but, unfortunately, there is no video or proof, other than the damage, itself,” Trump wrote on Truth Social on Sunday.
Trump has not only blamed vandals for supposedly damaging the Reflecting Pool, but repeatedly insisted that he had proof.
“We have photographs, or tapes, like moving cameras, right?” he said just days ago.
Trump made similar claims multiple other times, including in June.
“We also have pictures,” he told reporters.
When pressed to show those images, he said they would come out in time.
“At the right time you’ll see it,” Trump said, per CBS News. “You’ll see it in court.”

Ken Cedeno / AFP via Getty Images
Trump was livid last week when Jeanine Pirro, the former Fox News host who is now US attorney for the District of Columbia, dropped criminal charges against former Olympic athlete David Hearn, who had been accused of damaging the Reflecting Pool.
Hearn had insisted all along that he was innocent, and last week, Pirro released a statement admitting that the damage was caused by a botched installation and not vandalism.
In his post on Sunday, however, Trump insisted that “a highly credible witness” who works for the National Park Service saw Hearn “violently” rip the “somewhat delicate coating.”
That also flies in the face of other Trump claims.
In May, for example, Trump said the lining was “so strong, so powerful” that it couldn’t be cut with a knife. He even drove his motorcade across it while it was being installed to inspect the work.

Alex Brandon – Pool/Getty Images
Trump admitted that “there was also some contractor error done,” but insisted it “was relatively inconsequential.”
Trump had the Reflecting Pool renovated in the spring in an attempt to restore it before the Independence Day celebrations over the summer. However, the project was almost immediately plagued by problems. In addition to the lining coming loose and peeling off, the pool turned green with algae only days after reopening.
Trump blamed vandals for the algae as well.
On Sunday, he said the Reflecting Pool would reopen “shortly.”
Listen to Commons People, the podcast that makes politics easy. Every week, Kevin Schofield and Kate Nicholson unpack the week’s biggest stories to keep you informed. Join us for straightforward analysis of what’s going on at Westminster.
Politics
Strictly Come Dancing Couple James And Ola Jordan Confirm Split
Former Strictly Come Dancing stars James and Ola Jordan have announced that they have split up after more than 25 years together.
In a statement, their representatives confirmed (as reported by The Independent): “It is with great sadness that I can confirm that James and Ola began a trial separation some time ago.
“Their shared priority remains co-parenting their daughter, Ella, and they are committed to putting her wellbeing first. They would greatly appreciate your understanding as they navigate this difficult time.”
James and Ola were already both competitive dancers when they met at an industry contest in 1999, before marrying four years later.
They were both then cast as Strictly professionals in 2006, with James remaining part of the BBC dance show until he left under something of a cloud in 2013, following numerous controversies during his stint.
Ola – who won the show in 2009, when she was paired with sports presenter Chris Hollins – lasted slightly longer, parting ways with Strictly after the 2015 season.
In 2020, the couple welcomed a baby, a daughter named Ella.
Following their respective departures from Strictly, the pair continued to make appearances on reality TV, both as a pair and as individuals.
James twice competed on Celebrity Big Brother, making it to the final during his first stint.
He later finished in second place on the 2019 season of ITV’s now-defunct celebrity skating show Dancing On Ice.
Ola, meanwhile, had been booked to compete on the infamous winter sports contest The Jump in 2014, but was one of several stars who had to withdraw due to injury.
Following her Strictly exit, she was cast on I’m A Celebrity, Get Me Out Of Here!, and served as a judge for two seasons of the Polish version of Strictly Come Dancing.
As a couple, James and Ola were judges on the BBC dance series Dancing On Wheels in 2010 (which was won by the Caroline Flack and her partner) and also appeared on Celebrity Coach Trip, Celebrity Through The Keyhole and Let’s Sing And Dance For Comic Relief.
Politics
‘America Is Weaker’: Democrat Warns Trump Has Already Lost The War On Iran
Senator Chris Murphy (D-Conn.) argued on Sunday that US President Donald Trump hasd already lost the war on Iran.
Last week, the Trump administration said it was approaching an Iran deal to reopen the Strait of Hormuz, a key shipping chokepoint for global oil, but negotiations have remained stymied. Iranian leadership declared on Saturday that they won’t reopen the waterway unless the US meets its sweeping demands, including war reparations.
“Donald Trump has lost this war,” Murphy said. “America is weaker. Iran is stronger. The price to reopen the strait increases by the day. The supposed deal that’s on the table right now would pay Iran $100 million, excuse me, $100 billion a year, in order to reopen the Strait. That is one-third of Iran’s entire economy.”
Murphy described the latest deal as a “victory for Iran” because at the end of the war, they will “get paid to reopen the Strait” and receive funding to rebuild their military.
NBC’s Meet the Press moderator Kristen Welker asked Murphy if there was any deal that could be negotiated between the U.S. and Iran that he would support in order to “declare victory and move on.”
“Yes, I will support a deal to end this war and reopen the strait. I am prepared to support a bad deal to end this war and reopen the strait because the only deal that is available at this point in time is a terrible bad deal.”
Murphy then discussed the stress that Americans were experiencing as the prices of gas and food continued to rise.
“But the war needs to end because every day that the war continues, America gets weaker, Iran gets stronger, and people here in the United States get screwed, as prices go up and up and up,” he said.
Watch Murphy’s appearance on “Meet the Press” below. Skip to the 5:53 mark to hear his comments about the war in Iran:
Listen to Commons People, the podcast that makes politics easy. Every week, Kevin Schofield and Kate Nicholson unpack the week’s biggest stories to keep you informed. Join us for straightforward analysis of what’s going on at Westminster.
Politics
Burnham Announces Crackdown On Scam Discounts
Andy Burnham is to announce a crackdown on “rip off discounts and subscription traps” to help hard-pressed Brits deal with the cost of living crisis.
The prime minister will unveil a raft of “everyday fixes” to save people money as he tours the country throughout the rest of August.
Burnham said people are “sick and tired” of shops claiming to have slashed their prices when in reality they haven’t.
New measures to make it easier for people to cancel online subscriptions will also be introduced, potentially saving customers across the UK a staggering £1.6 billion.
The PM said: “I know people are sick and tired of rip-off discounts and subscription traps.
“Westminster has got used to telling people that everyday hassles like this are just part of life. I don’t think that’s right, especially when the cost of living continues to weigh heavily on so many people’s lives.
“I’m determined to pull every single lever we can to provide people with some room to breathe on the cost of living.”
Under the plans, retailers will be banned from claiming prices in their shops have been discounted when they have not been in an attempt to trick customers into thinking they are getting a bargain.
New rules will also come into force in January 2027 forcing companies to provide clearer information on the cost of subscriptions, and making it much easier to exit contracts.
A new 14-day cooling-off period will also let consumers cancel when a trial subscription ends, or long-term contract renews.
Burnham said: “We’re putting an end to phoney bargains. If something is advertised as half price, it should actually be half price. We’re also making it as easy to leave a subscription as it is to join.
“These are just two of the everyday fixes we’re going to be rolling out – today is just the start. We want to put more money in people’s pockets and give people hope that politics really can work for them and their everyday lives.”
Sue Davies, head of consumer rights policy at Which?, said: “It’s great news that the government intends to tighten up the law and explicitly ban misleading pricing practices, while putting an end to subscription traps.
“The government must implement these rules swiftly to give consumers much-needed protection against sneaky pricing tactics and hold businesses to account with tough enforcement, including fines, if they fall short.”
Dame Clare Moriarty, chief executive of Citizens Advice, said: “For too long consumers have been tricked into paying for products or services they don’t use – or didn’t even want to begin with – costing millions of pounds each year.
“So we really welcome the government’s move to speed up action on subscription traps and look at banning other tactics firms use to catch consumers out.”
Burnham’s government has already removed VAT from electricity bills, capped bus fares at £2 outside London and slashed business rates on hospitality businesses by 20%.
Listen to Commons People, the podcast that makes politics easy. Every week, Kevin Schofield and Kate Nicholson unpack the week’s biggest stories to keep you informed. Join us for straightforward analysis of what’s going on at Westminster.
Politics
Our Survey: Badenoch backed on candidates and the party not running in Clacton
Kemi Badenoch has been criticised over this summer for four things that opponents, and some fellow Conservatives or Conservative supporters have raised.
The decision to back Joshua Bonehill-Paine as a council candidate, despite him having been jailed some years ago for a neo-nazi anti-semitic and misogynist hate campaign waged towards some former MPs including Luciana Berger, has prompted questions about her judgement, some on the pages of this site.
I repeat my own concern which was a the risk of looking like she’d made a special exception for a person who has been a vocal and passionate supporter of the lady herself for well over a year, whilst imposing a discipline on all her new candidates and seeing people such as Sir Grant Shapps rejected as a candidate.
The reassuring news for Badenoch is that our survey response, whilst it doesn’t tackle the case of Joshua Bonehill-Paine is clear on the decision to have all candidates sign up to the Party position on Net-Zero (which is not by the way to scrap it, just how you achieve it without hobbling bill payers) and to leaving the ECHR.
80 percent of responders back this candidate policy and only 16.8 percent disgree. Though of course to take part in our survery that 16.8 percent are still Conservatives members, or were at the time the survey took place. They may disagree but it hasn’t pushed them out.
Of course one by-election where no Conservative candidate is standing is the slightly bizarre Clacton vote this Thursday 13th August. Where the former MP Nigel Farage, leader of Reform UK, resigned the seat inorder to win it again. He is highly likely to do so, but even if he got every vote there was, and he won’t, the investigation into his funds, especially whether he should have declared a £5m ‘gift’ from a Thai based crypto billionaire, will simply resume, whatever the result.
Labour, the Liberal Democrats, Greens and Conservative party all decided not to field a candidate in what Badenoch branded a ‘fake’ by-election. Reform, predicatably, claimed everyone was scared of standing against Farage. Count Binface is currently his closest rival in the contest. Reform wasted no time on criticising the Tories for not standing.
But did Conservative members agree with the decision not to stand?
Well 73.4 percent said the Conservatives were right not to put up a candidate. They have already indicated they will field a candidate if a second by-election is held, if it comes as a result of a recall petition, should Parliamentary Standards Committee’s investigation lead to a suspension for breaching the rules (rules that apply to all MPs whatever their party) Again those members who disagree are not invisible, 22.3 per cent thought a candidate should have been chosen to contest Clacton, but there’s still almost three quarters of responders backing the party’s stance.
It’s led also to a much more mixed response to the question I suggested would find it’s definitive answer this year, about ‘uniting the right’ – a scenario that still tends to mean some form of accommodation between the Conservatives and Reform and/or possibly Restore.
There are still Conservatives who think Badenoch is wrong not to talk to Farage, and despair that Farage continues to claim the Tories are ‘dead’ or ‘finished’.
From these figures we can see 65.8 percent still think some form of ‘uniting’ will occur but are closely split on when that might be – slightly more thinking it will come after a general election. But that 27.3 figure who don’t believe it will happen at all is new, and larger than we’ve seen in the last two years.
What we don’t know is what proportion of that 27.3 per cent is unhappy about it but still believes it won’t happen (Badenoch has been absolutely clear she doesn’t want any deal) or whether they are all saying that because they like her believe it would be a mistake.
We’ve consistently argued that electoral maths would force the question, rather than individuals or party members but it seems further away as a prospect than it has for two years and I know a large number of Tories who put this down to what they see as a relentless campaign by Reform spokespeople to rubbish the Tories or declare they want to ‘destroy’ the party.
It’s a predictably human response to want to bite the hand that is constantly seeking to smack you in the face. My own view is it has been a motivator for committed Conservatives to get back to campaigning, after the impact of the 2024 election defeat.
The post Our Survey: Badenoch backed on candidates and the party not running in Clacton appeared first on Conservative Home.
-
Fashion3 days agoFrugal Friday’s Workwear Report: Cap-Sleeve Pointelle Crewneck Sweater
-
Fashion3 days agoWeekend Open Thread: Mattifying Sunscreen
-
Sports4 days agoJordan Coyle & Cordiamo take Laya Arena Stakes at RDS
-
Business4 days agoUS stocks: Dow closes at record on Mideast optimism; SpaceX, AMD drag Nasdaq
-
News Videos2 days agoCan Astrology Help Find Gold and Silver Trends? A Financial Astrology Guide
-
Crypto World6 days agoUS Tech Stocks See Largest 5-Week Inflow in History: Can Nasdaq Break Its Downtrend?
-
Politics4 days agoReform UK And Greens Sink To Lowest Favourability Ratings To Date
-
Business5 days agoNvidia Stock Climbs 2.5% as Chip Sector Rally Builds Ahead of AMD Earnings, Nvidia’s Own Report Looms
-
Crypto World6 days agoPolymarket targets $20 billion valuation as competition heats up in prediction market sector
-
Tech5 days agoOpenAI, Anthropic AI agents targeted real people and systems in cyber tests
-
Business4 days agoSupply chain issues impact Ingredion
-
Crypto World6 days agoCLARITY Act Senate Vote Locked In, But 60-Vote Hurdle Looms Large
-
Tech3 days agoRinn Pharma & Biopharma to join NordicPharmaTrain network
-
Crypto World6 days agoThe Senate has one week: CLARITY’s last August window
-
Crypto World5 days agoDow and S&P 500 Hit Records on AI Earnings: When Will the Bubble Burst?
-
Crypto World7 days agoCalifornia Wildfire Bets Expose Polymarket’s Dark Side
-
Business1 day agoHow to Start a Cleaning Business: A Step-by-Step Guide
-
Business23 hours agoDatadog: Best Of Breed For Multiple Reasons
-
Business6 days agoCNH Industrial Shares Jump Over 15% After Beating Estimates and Raising Full-Year Earnings Guidance
-
Crypto World6 days agoNew York sued, who is next

You must be logged in to post a comment Login