Connect with us
DAPA Banner

Tech

How to Choose the Right Automation Stack

Published

on

Digital transformation has become an imperative. Companies throughout the US economy are in an all-out race to automate their workplaces, for all sorts of reasons: Labor is getting more expensive while robots are getting better and cheaper; real wages have been flat for years so companies are hiring less and machines more; and workers across multiple industries want machines alongside them, as a way of making their jobs (and joints) less painful. But in the quest for building the optimal automation stack, leaders are often left with a single important question:

Should we invest in RPA, BPM, or iPaaS — or all three?

It is important to know these differences before choosing an appropriate solution. Today, we unpack RPA, BPM and iPaaS in plain language — with facts and trends — so you can call your own shots.

First, Let’s Understand the Core Technologies

1. What is RPA?

Robotic Process Automation (RPA) applies bots to complete routine, rule-based tasks which would involve human interaction with digital systems. Similar bots log into applications, key in information, transfer files and conduct transactions in much the same way employees do — but faster, and without errors.

Advertisement

The global market for RPA software has grown into the double digits year over year, and this remained true even as organisations continued to automate back-office operations, according to Gartner. Many firms are teaming up with RPA services to fast-track the implementation process with enterprise-grade control.

RPA works best when:

Tasks are repetitive and rule-driven

Data is structured

Advertisement

Systems lack APIs (legacy applications)

Quick ROI is required

“RPA is, however, task-level automation — not full process optimisation.

2. What is BPM?

Business Process Management (BPM) is from a design, monitoring and reconfiguration perspective the whole workflow. Rather than automating discrete tasks, BPM enhances the entire process life cycle.

Advertisement

For example:

Employee onboarding

Insurance claims processing

Loan approval workflows

Advertisement

BPM solutions offer visibility, governance, compliance and control tracking, as well as workflow orchestration. If RPA is the “worker,” then BPM is the “manager” overseeing the entire operation.

BPM practitioners see improved efficiency, shorter cycle times, and better compliance in the context of regulated industries.

3. What is iPaaS?

iPaaS (Integration Platform as a Service) is a cloud-based integration model that links applications, data and devices with connectors and APIs. It guarantees instant data synchronisation between those solutions and other systems (CRM, ERP, HRMS, cloud applications).

If you are a company that’s working with multi-cloud or hybrid solutions, iPaaS is an absolute must.

Advertisement

Being a backend data layer integration tool, and not operating at the user interface level like RPA, iPaaS is far more stable and scalable for long-term integration needs.

Key Differences at a Glance

Technology

Focus

Best For

Advertisement

Scalability

RPA

Task automation

Repetitive manual tasks

Advertisement

Medium

BPM

Process orchestration

End-to-end workflow optimisation

Advertisement

High

iPaaS

System integration

Connecting cloud & enterprise apps

Advertisement

Very High

Why Businesses Are Moving Toward Hyperautomation

The future of automation isn’t a question of picking one tool. It’s about combining them strategically.

This combination is known as hyperautomation – combining RPA, BPM, iPaaS and AI with analytics in a cohesive system.

Advertisement

The hyperautomation market is anticipated to expand substantially until 2030, as businesses increasingly require intelligent and scalable automation solutions, industry estimates say.

A good hyperautomation company generally assists companies to model multi-layered architectures where:

BPM manages workflows

iPaaS handles system integration

Advertisement

RPA automates individual tasks

AI enhances decision-making

This is orchestration that provides measurable ROI and long-term scalability.

When Should You Choose RPA?

RPA is ideal when:

Advertisement

You want to make quick wins with minimal changes in infrastructure

You do similar finance or HR jobs repeatedly

For legacy systems, you will require the automation

You want to do cheaper operations fast

Advertisement

Many companies kick off their automation journey with RPA services to eliminate manual roadblocks in for example finance and operations.

But RPA just might not scale well enough on its own, without tying in and orchestrating workflow.

When Should You Choose BPM?

Choose BPM if:

You really want to see everything that’s happening in workflows

Advertisement

Compliance and auditable trails are very essential.

Processes involve multiple departments

Continuous optimisation is required

BPM solutions empower you to redesign and automate inefficient workflows. This protects against the common pitfall of “automating broken processes”. 

Advertisement

When Should You Choose iPaaS?

Choose iPaaS if:

You use multiple SaaS applications

Real-time data flow is essential

API-driven architecture is available

Advertisement

You want scalable cloud integration

iPaaS lets you rely less on UI-based bots and provides more durable backend integrations.

The role of Low-Code and Test Automation

Modern automation stacks are helped alongside low-code and no-code application development platforms. Therefore with these types of tools, business teams can genuinely create workflows and apps without deep coding skills, further fueling digital initiatives.

Plus, collaborating with such providers who deliver the top test automation services ensures that your automation scripts, along with integrations and workflows are consistent even as systems change over time. Testing is key because poorly controlled automation systems can be broken by UI changes, API updates or workflow adjustments.

Advertisement

How to Build Your Automation Stack (Step-By-Step Framework)

Here’s a basic expert framework to guide you in the decision:

Step 1: Identify Your Bottleneck

Are we actually faced with task repetition, that is lack of efficiency or division within the system?

Task problem → RPA

Advertisement

Workflow problem → BPM

Integration problem → iPaaS

Step 2: Assess Technical Environment

Legacy systems → RPA shines here

Advertisement

systems with an API → iPaaS is awesome

Complex cross-functional processes → BPM is necessary

Step 3: Plan for Scalability

Avoid building isolated automation silos. Integrate technologies in an organised automation infrastructure.

Advertisement

This is one of the reasons that companies frequently partner with providers who bring additional RPA Services to the table with an IR group that speaks BPM and integration frameworks design.

Real-World Example

Picture a health care provider sifting through thousands of insurance claims.

BPM designs the claims workflow

RPA pulls data from the old systems

Advertisement

iPaaS consolidates CRM, billing and compliance systems

Automated tests guarantee that workflows work without interruption

The result:

Faster processing time

Advertisement

Reduced manual errors

Improved regulatory compliance

Better patient experience

What are the Common Mistakes to Avoid

1. Automating without process redesign

Advertisement

2. RPA only without integration

3. Ignoring governance and testing

4. Not planning for long-term scalability

An organisation with RPA Services ensures that these pitfalls are avoided.

Advertisement

Final Thoughts: What’s the Best Option?

RPA vs BPM vs iPaaS: No clear winner.

The correct answer will vary based on your business goal, technical ecosystem and long-term strategy.

If you can’t afford to wait for efficiency gains, open with RPA.

If you need additional governance and optimisation, do BPBM.

Advertisement

If you want to make data communications seamless, put some money into iPaaS.

If you want to transform at an enterprise level, that’s when you choose hyperautomation.

The most successful organisations view automation as a strategic capability, and not just another investment in technology.

Together with RPA, BPM, iPaaS, low-code platforms and powerful test frameworks in place this will allow your business to create a strong automation ecosystem which brings measurable ROI and power for sustainable growth. 

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Tech

The Real Difference Between Pickup Truck And Car Engines

Published

on





Are pickup truck engines the same as those used in normal passenger or sports cars? The answer is both yes and no. Physically, at least, there’s usually little that separates an engine in a truck’s engine bay from one in a car’s. After all, there have been plenty of times in the industry’s history when automakers have sold cars and trucks with nearly identical engines. Case in point, the legendary Chrysler slant-six engine, which came in everything from compact cars to pickup trucks and vans.

But in the modern era, especially, there can be notable differences between car and truck engines, even if their displacement and general engine architecture are the same. The modern HEMI V8 used in Dodge muscle cars and Ram pickups is a good example of this, with different versions of the same engines used in performance cars and pickups. Most of the differences between truck and car engines involve how and when the engines deliver their horsepower and torque. 

A car engine may produce more peak horsepower than an equivalent truck engine, but the truck engine will often provide more torque or deliver the same amount of torque at lower revs. Just how much difference there is between the two will vary by automaker, and some brands, like Ford, offer V8 engines designed from the ground up for trucks that share nothing with their car counterparts.

Advertisement

The different flavors of V8s

Ultimately, the main difference between car and truck engines is rooted in the difference between horsepower and torque. While horsepower matters in a truck, when it comes to pulling a trailer or carrying a heavy load, it’s the torque that’s important — and the lower in an engine’s powerband that torque comes, the better it is. Thus, the popularity of ultra-torquey, but relatively low-horsepower turbodiesel engines for large pickups. Peak horsepower, meanwhile, takes prominence in a sports car where engine speeds are higher. 

Even within the same V8 family, there can be notable differences in car and truck engines. In GM’s V8 lineup, the 401-hp 6.6-liter L8T truck engine is designed for low-speed torque, with 464 lb-ft of torque at 4,000 RPM. The Chevrolet Corvette’s smaller, 495-hp 6.2-liter LT2 V8 is part of the same family and easily bests the L8T in peak horsepower, yet it barely edges the L8T in torque. It also needs to rev much higher to generate its torque, with its 470 lb-ft coming at 5,150 rpm. 

Advertisement

Ford’s Super Duty 7.3-liter Godzilla V8 takes this concept even further. Not only is the Godzilla much larger than the 5.0 Coyote V8 in the Mustang GT, but it also uses an entirely different design with an overhead-valve, single-camshaft design compared to the 5.0’s dual overhead cams and 32 valves. At 480 hp, the 5.0 beats out the 430-horsepower Godzilla, but the 7.3 takes the torque crown, with 475 pound-feet to the Mustang’s 415 lb-ft.

Advertisement

The curious case of the Nissan 240SX

So what happens, then, if you put a pickup truck engine into a sports car? Look no further than the North American-market Nissan 240SX from the 1990s. When the S13 Nissan Silvia and 180SX debuted in the Japanese home market, the cars were available with high-horsepower turbocharged four-cylinder engines — first the 1.8-liter CA18DET and later the legendary SR20DET. This, combined with a great chassis and tons of aftermarket support, helped the S13 become a smash hit among enthusiasts.

However, when it came time to export the car to America, Nissan decided to forgo the turbo engines in favor of the naturally aspirated 2.4-liter KA24 engine used in Nissan pickup trucks. Though the USDM engine was larger than its JDM counterpart and produced a decent amount of torque for its size, the KA24 only made 140 hp and, more importantly, lacked the high-revving sports car feel many expected from the 240SX. 

Fortunately, the SR20DET was an easy swap, and Nissan’s decision to go with a truck engine didn’t entirely detract from the many features that helped the 240SX become a legendary drift car in the years and decades that followed. Even then, though, one can’t help but wonder what would’ve happened had Nissan given the U.S. market 240SX the turbocharged performance engine it deserved.  

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

AI Can Clone Open-Source Software In Minutes

Published

on

ZipNada writes: Two software researchers recently demonstrated how modern AI tools can reproduce entire open-source projects, creating proprietary versions that appear both functional and legally distinct. The partly-satirical demonstration shows how quickly artificial intelligence can blur long-standing boundaries between coding innovation, copyright law, and the open-source principles that underpin much of the modern internet.

In their presentation, Dylan Ayrey, founder of Truffle Security, and Mike Nolan, a software architect with the UN Development Program, introduced a tool they call malus.sh. For a small fee, the service can “recreate any open-source project,” generating what its website describes as “legally distinct code with corporate-friendly licensing. No attribution. No copyleft. No problems.” It’s a test case in how intellectual property law — still rooted in 19th-century precedent — collides with 21st-century automation. Since the US Supreme Court’s Baker v. Selden ruling, copyright has been understood to guard expression, not ideas.

That boundary gave rise to clean-room design, a method by which engineers reverse-engineer systems without accessing the original source code. Phoenix Technologies famously used the technique to build its version of the PC BIOS during the 1980s. Ayrey and Nolan’s experiment shows how AI can perform a clean-room process in minutes rather than months. But faster doesn’t necessarily mean fair. Traditional clean-room efforts required human teams to document and replicate functionality — a process that demanded both legal oversight and significant labor. By contrast, an AI-mediated “clean room” can be invoked through a few prompts, raising questions about whether such replication still counts as fair use or independent creation.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Tech

Intel repurchasing 49pc stake in Leixlip chip factory for $14.2bn

Published

on

Intel said the agreement is reflective of a strong partnership with Apollo, as well as the organisation’s role in the age of AI.

US technology company Intel has plans to repurchase a 49pc stake of the Leixlip, Kildare Fab 34 manufacturing facility, via a partnership with asset manager Apollo Global Management. The deal which will be valued at $14.2bn is expected to be funded through cash on hand and proceeds from the issuance of new debt of approximately $6.5 bn. 

With work beginning in 2019, Fab 34 was designed to be an advanced semiconductor manufacturing facility. 

There has been significant investment in the plant over the years with the organisation hitting several important milestones and currently it is a fabrication facility for products utilising the Intel 4 and Intel 3 process technologies, for example Intel Core Ultra and Intel Xeon 6 processors.

Advertisement

In 2024, it was decided that Intel would sell a 49pc stake in Fab 34 to Apollo Global Management.

At the time, David Zinsner, the chief financial officer at Intel, said that the $11bn deal would give the chip maker the “additional flexibility to execute our strategy as we invest to create the world’s most resilient and sustainable semiconductor supply chain”. Intel also said it would be retaining full ownership and control of Fab 34 and its assets. 

Commenting on the recent announcement Zinsner said, “Our 2024 agreement was the right structure at the right time and provided Intel with meaningful flexibility, enabling us to accelerate critical initiatives. Today, we have a stronger balance sheet, improved financial discipline and an evolved business strategy.”

Apollo Partner Jamshid Ehsani added, “Our partnership with Intel began at an important stage in the execution of its advanced manufacturing roadmap, where our long-term strategic capital played a meaningful role in accelerating the production of next-generation chip technology.

Advertisement

“Flexibility and alignment are core to how we approach relationships as a long-term, solutions-oriented capital partner, and we are pleased to facilitate this transaction in support of Intel’s evolving strategic and operational priorities.”

Don’t miss out on the knowledge you need to succeed. Sign up for the Daily Brief, Silicon Republic’s digest of need-to-know sci-tech news.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Tech

Thinborne Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra Case Review: Is It Better Than Samsung’s Slim Magnet Case?

Published

on

Samsung already has its own slim magnetic case for the Galaxy S26 Ultra, so most people won’t think twice about alternatives.

But choosing the right Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra case isn’t always as straightforward as it seems. Some cases look great on day one but end up feeling too smooth, slightly bulky, or just awkward to use after a few days. Thinborne is still a thin magnetic case, but it takes a slightly different approach.

This review focuses on how it feels in real use, and how it compares to Samsung’s own option.

Thinborne Overview of Features

It helps to look at what Thinborne actually offers and how those features translate in real use.

Advertisement

Material and Build

Thinborne uses 600D aramid fiber, which you’ll usually see in lightweight, high-strength materials. You’ll notice how it feels:

  • It’s very light
  • It feels firm rather than flexible
  • The surface has a subtle texture

At 0.90 mm thin, it doesn’t add much bulk. The phone still feels close to how it does without a case.

What makes it different from typical cases is the structure. It doesn’t have that soft, slightly rubbery feel you get from silicone. It’s more rigid, almost like a thin shell that snaps into place. Over time, silicone can start to feel sticky or collect dust – this doesn’t.

Black Thinborne case for the regular S26

MagSafe Compatibility

Like most Galaxy S26 Ultra cases, Thinborne includes built-in magnets since the phone itself doesn’t have them. In everyday use, that means:

  • Chargers snap into place quickly
  • Car mounts hold steady
  • Wallets and stands attach cleanly

The experience is straightforward, and everything lines up as expected (and it stays in place).

One thing that helps with the setup is the case’s rigidity. Since it doesn’t flex much, the alignment stays consistent. You don’t get that slight shift you sometimes notice with softer cases.

S26 Ultra case connected to a MagSafe case

Available Colors

Thinborne keeps the color options simple:

  • Black
  • Royal Crimson
  • Wild Navy

All three use the same woven finish, so the feel doesn’t change – only the color does. The tones are muted and don’t draw too much attention.

Thinborne Thin Phone Case vs Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra Slim Magnet Case

Samsung’s Slim Magnet Case is the most direct comparison. Both cases fall into the same general category: thin, lightweight, and magnetic.

Advertisement

Samsung doesn’t list an exact thickness, but it’s positioned as a slim case. What we do know is that it weighs 24 grams, making it a bit heavier than Thinborne, which weighs around 20 grams.

Here’s how they compare:

Feature Thinborne Galaxy S26 Ultra Case Samsung Slim Magnet Case
Weight 20 g 24 g
Thickness 0.90 mm slim profile (not officially listed)
Material 600D aramid fiber Synthetic/plastic
Grip Textured (woven) Smooth
Magnets Built-in magnetic array Built-in magnets

As you can see, Thinborne and Samsung look similar. In use, however, the differences can be noticed:

  • Grip – Thinborne has a bit more texture, so it feels more secure in your hand. Samsung’s case is smoother, which can feel slightly slippery.
  • Weight – The difference isn’t huge, but the lighter feel can be noticeable over time – especially on a large phone like the S26 Ultra.
  • Material feel – Thinborne feels more solid and structured. Samsung’s case feels more like a standard slim case.

Pricing and Availability

Thinborne and Samsung are priced almost the same, so cost isn’t really the deciding factor here.

Thinborne comes in at $69.69, while Samsung’s Slim Magnet Case is slightly higher at $69.99. The difference is minimal, and in practice, both sit in the same premium range for thin magnetic cases.

Advertisement

Where they differ is availability. Thinborne is sold through its official website and is also available on Amazon, which gives you a bit more flexibility when buying. It typically includes extras like a tempered glass screen protector as well.

Samsung’s case is easier to find overall. It’s available through Samsung’s store and most major retailers, making it a more convenient option if you prefer to buy locally or through familiar channels.

At this price point, it really comes down to which case fits your preferences better, not which one is cheaper.

Wrap Up

Thinborne keeps things simple, and that’s really the point. It’s built as a thin phone case that doesn’t change how the Galaxy S26 Ultra feels in your hand. The lighter weight, subtle texture, and rigid build all come together in a way that feels easy to live with day to day.

Advertisement

Samsung’s Slim Magnet Case still does what it’s supposed to. It’s reliable, widely available, and works well with magnetic accessories. But if you care about how your phone actually feels in use, Thinborne has a clear edge. The lighter weight and textured finish make it easier to hold, especially during one-handed use – something you start to notice after a few days of use.

Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

Microsoft links Classic Outlook issue to email delivery problems

Published

on

Outlook

Microsoft is investigating a known issue that prevents some Classic Outlook users from sending emails via Outlook.com.

Affected users are being warned that their message hasn’t reached some intended recipients, and they will encounter this problem more often when the Outlook.com account they use to send email is an Outlook profile linked to another Exchange account.

“This message could not be sent. Try sending the message again later or contact your network administrator,” the non-delivery report (NDR) error displayed when sending or replying to emails reads.

“You do not have the permission to send the message on behalf of the specified user. Error is [0x80070005-0x0004dc-0x000524].”

Advertisement

Microsoft added that another condition that may trigger these errors is that the sender’s account has an Exchange Online mail contact with the same SMTP address.

Classic Outlook non-delivery report (NDR) error
Classic Outlook non-delivery report (NDR) error (Microsoft)

​While investigating this issue and still looking for a fix, the Outlook team shared several workarounds that may help affected customers temporarily mitigate the issue.

Microsoft recommends removing the M365 account Address Book so that the Outlook client does not check it when sending emails, hiding the Outlook.com contact from the Microsoft 365 account Global Address List (GAL).

Other alternatives include creating a new classic Outlook profile that includes only the account receiving NDR errors, and using the New Outlook client or Outlook.com on the web to send email from the affected account.

Over the last two weeks, Microsoft fixed two other known issues, including one that caused Classic Outlook to crash when enabling the Microsoft Teams Meeting Add-in and another that triggered 0x800CCC0F and 0x80070057 errors when synchronizing Gmail and Yahoo accounts.

Advertisement

Microsoft is also investigating known bugs that cause “Can’t connect to the server” errors when creating groups if Exchange Web Services (EWS) is enabled for the tenant, and that make the mouse pointer disappear for some users in Classic Outlook, OneNote, and other Microsoft 365 apps.

Automated pentesting proves the path exists. BAS proves whether your controls stop it. Most teams run one without the other.

This whitepaper maps six validation surfaces, shows where coverage ends, and provides practitioners with three diagnostic questions for any tool evaluation.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Tech

Rapid Snow Melt-Off In American West Stuns Scientists

Published

on

Scientists say extreme March heat caused an unusually rapid collapse of snowpack across the American West that’s leaving major basins at record or near-record lows. “This year is on a whole other level,” said Dr Russ Schumacher, a Colorado State University climatologist. “Seeing this year so far below any of the other years we have data for is very concerning.” The Guardian reports: […] The issue is extremely widespread. Data from a branch of the US Department of Agriculture (USDA), which logs averages based on levels between 1991 and 2020, shows states across the south-west and intermountain west with eye-popping lows. The Great Basin had only 16% of average on Monday and the lower Colorado region, which includes most of Arizona and parts of Nevada, was at 10%. The Rio Grande, which covers parts of New Mexico, Texas and Colorado, was at 8%. “This year has the potential of being way worse than any of the years we have analogues for in the past,” Schumacher said.

Even with near-normal precipitation across most of the west, every major river basin across the region was grappling with snow drought when March began, according to federal analysts. Roughly 91% of stations reported below-median snow water equivalent, according to the last federal snow drought update compiled on March 8. Water managers and climate experts had been hopeful for a March miracle — a strong cold storm that could set the region on the right track. Instead, a blistering heatwave unlike any recorded for this time of year baked the region and spurred a rapid melt-off. “March is often a big month for snowstorms,” Schumacher said. “Instead of getting snow we would normally expect we got this unprecedented, way-off-the-scale warmth.”

More than 1,500 monthly high temperature records were broken in March and hundreds more tied. The event was “likely among the most statistically anomalous extreme heat events ever observed in the American south-west,” climate scientist Daniel Swain said in an analysis posted this week. “Beyond the conspicuous ‘weirdness’ of it all,” Swain added, “the most consequential impact of our record-shattering March heat will likely be the decimation of the water year 2025-26 snowpack across nearly all of the American west.” Calling the toll left by the heat “nothing short of shocking,” Swain noted that California was tied for its worst mountain snowpack value on record. While the highest elevations are still coated in white, “lower slopes are now completely bare nearly statewide.”

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Tech

If Elden Ring was Turned Into a 90s-Inspired Saturday Morning Cartoon, This is What it would Look Like

Published

on

64 Bits Elden Ring 90s Cartoon
Studio 64 Bits worked tirelessly for four months to hand-draw every single frame, allowing them to introduce Elden Ring to the wild world of Saturday morning television in the 90s. The end effect feels like a bizarre parallel universe in which the game appears alongside Thundercats and He-Man.



Ranni is right there at the start, cradling a double-necked electric guitar slung lazily across her shoulders, and as she begins noodling on the opening chords, the camera sweeps across these blasted landscapes, full of familiar faces from both the base game and the Shadow of the Erdtree expansion. We see Malenia charging ahead with blades flashing, Blaidd standing tall and loyal by her side, and Messmer looming large as the true new threat. Meanwhile, Miquella and Radahn share a dramatic moment, and Melina, Rykard, Mohg, Varre, Midra, Placidusax, Astel, Maliketh, and the Elden Beast all flash across the screen in quick, splashy bursts. Each character receives the usual cartoon makeover, complete with bold outlines, vivid colors, and exaggerated posturing that transforms their conflicts into heroic showdowns rather than gloomy, terrible struggles.

64 Bits Elden Ring 90s Cartoon
The animation sticks to the technical limits of 90’s TV production, which means that the colors don’t deviate much from a fairly limited palette, the lines have just a hint of that creaky hand-drawn cel look to them, and the transitions snap along with the same crisp timing you’d see on shows from that era. The music builds to a precise pitch, culminating in a driving rock song that sounds like it might have come directly from the opening titles of Jayce and the Wheeled Warriors or Captain Planet. Every second creates the impression that an entire series could follow, with the Tarnished rushing across the continent to repair the Elden Ring and face off against these legendary monsters in one thrilling episode after the next.

64 Bits Elden Ring 90s Cartoon
After the main intro concludes, the film transitions to a brief commercial in which Elden Ring appears to have recently been released for the old SNES. A happy narration promises additional dungeons, secrets, and a fate that is entirely in the player’s control. The tagline reverses a humorous old Nintendo slogan into ‘Now you’re playing with power, rune power’, and the spot concludes with a quick little bumper that parodies the DIC logo from coutnless old 90’s cartoons. It connects neatly to their last full-length SNES remake, making the entire package feel like one continuous block of faux Saturday morning programming.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Tech

I skipped Meta’s AI glasses, but they’ve finally fixed a fundamental problem for millions other like me

Published

on

Smart glasses have always had a basic problem for people like me. They looked cool in demos, sounded futuristic in press releases, and usually came with the same quiet catch. If you already wear glasses every day, you are expected to work around them. This meant adding prescription lenses later, settling for a fit that is not quite right, or treating the whole thing as a novelty instead of something you would actually wear throughout the day.

This is what makes Meta’s latest announcement more exciting. The company just unveiled its first prescription-optimized AI glasses, the Ray-Ban Meta Blayzer Optics (Gen 2) and Ray-Ban Meta Scriber Optics (Gen 2), and they are explicitly designed around people who rely on prescription eyewear all day.

Meta says they support nearly all prescriptions, start at $499 in the US, and will be available at optical retailers beginning April 14.

For me, that is the first time Meta’s glasses story has felt less like wearable hype and more like something I could actually live with.

Advertisement

Prescription wearers don’t have to do extra work

Billions of people around the world use glasses or contacts for vision correction, and Meta itself notes that many Ray-Ban Meta and Oakley owners already add prescription lenses to existing models. But “can be added later” is not the same thing as “built for you from the start.”

The new prescription-first push feels more thoughtful. Meta says that these new models were designed for all-day comfort and include features like overextension hinges, interchangeable nose pads, and optician-adjustable temple tips. These may sound like dry-product language stuff, but if you actually wear glasses every day, it is the kind of detail that decides whether something stays on your face for the next eight hours or if it gets thrown into a case after 20 minutes.

Balancing act between ‘gadget’ and ‘eyewear’

Meta is not just launching two new frame styles and calling it a day. It is trying to make AI glasses feel like a normal category of eyewear rather than a niche device for early adopters. These new prescription-optimized frames aren’t alone, as Meta also announced more frame and lens options across Ray-Ban Meta and Oakley Meta glasses.

There’s also a new software feature, like hands-free nutrition tracking, WhatsApp summaries and recall through Meta AI, and Neural Handwriting support expanding to iMessage. All of this makes these new glasses feel more natural for daily use. The tech itself is only half the story. The real breakthrough is when you don’t need to accommodate the hardware.

And if you already wear prescription glasses, that threshold is even higher. A smartwatch can be optional. Glasses are not.

This is the first Meta glasses move that feels genuinely practical

This is basically why I think these new Meta glasses matter more than they might look on paper. The usual wearable pitch is about features, AI tricks, cameras, and convenience. But for prescription wearers, such as myself, the first question is whether I would actually want to wear this all day instead of normal glasses?

And for a change, Meta seems to be answering that question directly.

Advertisement

Yes, the concerns don’t disappear, and smart glasses still have the privacy baggage and hefty price tag. They also haven’t proved that their AI features are useful often enough to justify becoming part of your daily routine. But this launch clears a much more fundamental barrier than people give it credit for.

And for someone who already owns prescription Wayfarers and knows how much difference proper eyewear fit makes, Meta’s new AI glasses suddenly feel a lot more attractive.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Tech

Every 3D Printable Film Camera, In One Place

Published

on

For those of us who hack old cameras, the 3D printer has undoubtedly been a boon. High precision, or at least consistent precision, lightproof enclosures can be easily made and reproduced for others. As a result there are quite a few printable cameras out there, and we’ve featured our share here. We didn’t realize just how many there are without the work of [Sebastian] though, as he’s gathered together every one he can find in a glorious catalog of homemade photographic construction.

As a snapshot of the world of home made cameras it’s refreshing to see such a wide range of designs. There are pinholes aplenty as well as cameras using lenses from scavanged point and shoots through 35mm SLR, medium format, and even one using a Micro Four Thirds compact digital camera lens. For film there’s 35mm and 120 as well as large format, but we’re pleased to see a few instant cameras in there. Some of the models in the list are paid-for designs but most of them are free, so you probably won’t need any encouragement to make yourself a camera!

Unless we missed something, we didn’t see any movie cameras in the list. With 35mm and 16mm models to be found, we hope some of them make it.

Advertisement

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Tech

ChatGPT comes to Apple CarPlay but only if you are willing to talk to a robot

Published

on


  • ChatGPT arrives on Apple CarPlay update for iOS 26.4
  • Update adds support for “voice-based conversational apps”
  • Interaction is limited to voice prompts only

We reported on a big Apple update in February of this year with the release of the new iOS 26.4 public beta.

The headline news was the inclusion of third-party, voice-controlled AI chatbots on CarPlay for the first time, allowing drivers to make the most of AI assistants outside of those that come part and parcel of many modern cars.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2025