Connect with us
DAPA Banner

Tech

Caught In The Crackdown: As Arrests At Anti-ICE Protests Piled Up, Prosecutions Crumbled

Published

on

from the lying-liars dept

This story was originally published by ProPublica and Frontline. Republished under a CC BY-NC-ND 3.0 license.

The National Guard soldiers in desert camo piled out of unmarked vans in East Los Angeles last June, cordoning off East Sixth Street, a residential street lined with single family houses, and blocking a nearby road leading to an elementary school.

A squad of federal agents moved in flinging flash-bang grenades — explosives designed to disorient — into a small home before storming inside. They’d come for Alejandro Orellana, a Marine Corps veteran and UPS employee accused of being a central figure in a secret confederacy of insurrectionists. A news video had shown the 30-year-old distributing water, food and face shields to people protesting the Trump administration’s immigration roundups in Los Angeles.

Advertisement

Bill Essayli, a former state legislator who leads the federal prosecutor’s office in Los Angeles, joined the raid along with a Fox News crew.

With cameras rolling, Orellana, his parents and brothers were led out in handcuffs as agents searched their home.

On Fox News, Essayli, sporting a blue FBI windbreaker, hyped the arrest of Orellana, a quiet, wiry man with a long mane of coal-black hair. “It appears they’re well-orchestrated and coordinated, and well-funded,” he said. “And today was one of the first arrests — first key arrests — that we did.”

Essayli would charge Orellana with conspiracy — under a federal statute typically used to build cases against drug traffickers and organized crime — and with aiding and abetting civil disorder.

Advertisement

Within weeks, the prosecutor’s marquee case would quietly fall apart. Agents who searched Orellana’s house found little that could be considered incriminating, and prosecutors never charged anyone else as part of the supposed conspiracy. By late July, they moved to have the charges dismissed.

It wouldn’t be the only such case.

Over the past 10 months, President Donald Trump’s administration has made much of its success in sweeping through U.S. cities, capturing unauthorized immigrants and arresting people who publicly oppose the operations, routinely accusing dissenters of being domestic terrorists or extremists. Federal agents have arrested hundreds of U.S. citizens like Orellana — including protesters, activists observing the immigration enforcement operations, bystanders and, in some cases, the family members of people targeted for deportation.

Less clear to the public is what has happened to those charged.

Advertisement

To find out, ProPublica and FRONTLINE combed through social media, court records and news stories. Reporters identified more than 300 protesters and bystanders who were arrested by federal agents during immigration sweeps and were accused of crimes such as assaulting or interfering with law enforcement. 

But over and over those accusations fell apart under scrutiny. Our reviews of court files found that statements made by the arresting officers were repeatedly debunked by video footage. In more than a third of the cases, prosecutors quickly dismissed charges that couldn’t be substantiated, refused to file charges at all, or lost at trial. The tally of cases that end this way will likely climb as many of the arrests remain unresolved.

“What’s happening now is not comparable to anything that’s happened in the past,” said

Cuauhtémoc Ortega, the chief federal defender for the Central District of California, who personally represented Orellana and other protesters. “We’ve never had a situation where it seems like you arrest first and then try to justify the reasons for the arrests later.”

Advertisement

The Department of Homeland Security, which includes Border Patrol and Immigration and Customs Enforcement, did not respond to repeated requests for comment on the arrests and declined to answer detailed questions from ProPublica and FRONTLINE.

But in a statement in response to an earlier story, DHS said, “The First Amendment protects speech and peaceful assembly — not rioting. DHS is taking reasonable and constitutional measures to uphold the rule of law and protect our officers.”

Watch FRONTLINE and ProPublica’s Documentary: “Caught in the Crackdown”

Advertisement

Given the unprecedented nature of the urban sweeps, it is difficult to compare the rate of failed cases to another time period or context. But current and former federal prosecutors and other legal experts said having that number of arrests come to nothing is particularly striking in the federal system, where U.S. attorneys usually secure convictions or guilty pleas in more than 90% of the cases they bring; only 8.2% of federal criminal cases were dismissed in 2022, according to data compiled by that court system.

The failures highlight the challenges of sending large numbers of federal agents into major cities to conduct roving immigration sweeps: They aren’t accustomed to dealing with crowds of angry protesters 

Border Patrol agents are typically stationed at the border where their day-to-day work entails scooping up people who have crossed illegally. ICE agents, who often work in urban settings, had little prior experience handling hostile crowds. And FBI agents, who have aided in the immigration sweeps, would normally spend months or years painstakingly amassing evidence before making arrests.

That lack of experience in street policing and crowd control, coupled with the Trump administration’s demand for huge numbers of deportations, led agents to make a wave of unjustified arrests, legal experts say.

Advertisement

To be sure, protesters have often engaged in hostile behavior, hurling expletives, getting in agents’ faces and occasionally becoming violent. A woman in Minnesota is accused of biting off part of an agent’s finger during a scuffle after the killing of Alex Pretti in late January; in Los Angeles, an officer outside an immigration detention facility suffered a dislocated finger after a protester allegedly grabbed his bulletproof vest and shook him. 

But the agents’ conduct has also frequently been violent. As ProPublica and FRONTLINE reported last year, they have routinely shot pepper balls or tear gas at protesters in ways that violate their own rules, causing severe injuries to demonstrators in several cities. 

“The agents, they don’t know how to operate in these situations,” said Christy Lopez, a former Justice Department attorney who spent years investigating misconduct by law enforcement. Their behavior, she said, “is on par with the worst protest policing and just law enforcement that I’ve seen from any department, even in their worst days.

In its earlier statement, DHS said that “rioters and terrorists” have repeatedly attacked immigration agents, but ICE and Customs and Border Protection personnel “are trained to use the minimum amount of force necessary to resolve dangerous situations to prioritize the safety of the public and themselves.”

Advertisement

The arrests are not without consequence. Even unsuccessful prosecutions can be costly and emotionally taxing for defendants, said Jared Fishman, a former career prosecutor in the Department of Justice’s Civil Rights Division. The aggressive tactics of the agents and the gleeful social media posts by DHS accusing protesters of serious crimes, Fishman said, affect people’s willingness to publicly challenge the mass deportation policies. 

“If the goal of the Trump administration is to keep people out of the streets, then it doesn’t matter if the people are getting convicted,” said Fishman, now the executive director of the Justice Innovation Lab, a nonprofit focused on creating a more equitable and effective justice system. “I’m sure it’s having a chilling effect.”

After reviewing data and some court records for ProPublica and FRONTLINE, Fishman said, “The numbers seem to indicate a pattern and practice of illegal arrests.”

“We Must Identify Him”

The crackdown on protesters began in June of 2025, when the Department of Homeland Security launched its wave of major immigration sweeps in Southern California. The campaign was led by Gregory Bovino, a veteran Border Patrol chief who normally presided over a remote stretch of sand and scrub deep in the state’s Imperial Valley.

Advertisement

Bovino from the start encouraged his agents to shut down or arrest protesters.

“Arrest as many people that touch you as you want to. Those are the general orders, all the way to the top,” Bovino told his officers, footage from an agent’s body-worn camera shows. “Everybody fucking gets it if they touch you.”

He went on to remind them that their actions should be “legal, ethical, moral” while encouraging them to use so-called less lethal weapons on protesters.

“We’re gonna look at shipping tractor trailers full of that shit in here,” he said. 

Advertisement

Bovino’s forces repeatedly fired tear gas canisters and rubber bullets at the heads and faces of demonstrators and journalists. 

Bovino’s aggressive tactics sparked intense opposition from Angelenos, including those gathered in the streets in front of the sprawling federal office complex in downtown Los Angeles on June 9. 

That day Orellana drove his Ford F-150 pickup truck loaded with bottled water, snacks and cardboard boxes containing Uvex brand face shields — clear plastic masks designed to protect industrial workers from flying debris and chemical splashes — to the protest.

When he arrived in front of the federal building, another person hopped into the bed and began handing out the supplies to protesters gathered outside the entrance.

Advertisement

Orellana told FRONTLINE and ProPublica that he decided to help distribute the supplies after watching federal agents fire tear gas and rubber bullets into crowds at an earlier demonstration.

“A bunch of us took it upon ourselves to, you know, go downtown and give out these resources — the food, water and of course the PPE,” he said, referring to personal protective equipment.

Video and photos quickly made their way onto social media. An X user with more than 30,000 followers posted a photo of Orellana. “A photograph of the man delivering boxes of gas masks to the rioters has emerged,” wrote the poster. “We must identify him, so we can track down who is funding this coordinated attack.”

From there the thread was picked up by the conspiracy theorist Alex Jones, who has a vast audience on the platform. Jones, who repeatedly claimed that financier and philanthropist George Soros was funding the protests, eventually named Orellana as the driver of the pickup. More than two million people saw the post. 

Advertisement

Within 48 hours, the soldiers and federal agents arrived to arrest Orellana.

Over the next five months, they arrested more than one hundred U.S. citizens in Los Angeles and other cities in Southern California — most of them demonstrators — charging them with assaulting federal law enforcement personnel or interfering with agents’ activities. Others were accused of damaging government property. At least 16, like Orellana, were charged with conspiracy, which can carry a sentence of up to six years in prison.

ProPublica and FRONTLINE found that more than a third of those cases crumbled. In eight instances, juries acquitted defendants at trial. But more frequently, prosecutors dropped charges when the claims made by immigration officers and agents didn’t match video evidence or other inconsistencies emerged. In several cases, prosecutors declined to file charges at all. 

There have been some successful prosecutions: 32 of the 116 people whose arrests in California we reviewed have been convicted, many pleading guilty to misdemeanor charges. And in late February, jurors convicted two activists on stalking charges after they livestreamed themselves following an immigration agent to his home; the pair were acquitted of conspiracy.

Advertisement

Today 38 cases are still pending.

Essayli has stated on social media that his office brought more than 100 cases and secured convictions in more than half of them. When asked about the discrepancy between his claims and the data compiled by ProPublica and FRONTLINE, he declined to comment. 

“The U.S. attorney’s office does not lose cases because they’re bad lawyers,” said Carley Palmer, who spent eight years as a federal prosecutor in the office Essayli now runs. “They are excellent trial attorneys. So if they’re losing a case, it may mean that the evidence isn’t there, or it may mean that the community doesn’t believe it should be a federal crime.”

Palmer, who is now in private practice, said the glut of protest and low-level criminal immigration cases have shifted resources away from the complex prosecutions the DOJ is uniquely equipped to handle: environmental crimes, public corruption, financial fraud, cyberscams, civil rights violations.

Advertisement

Essayli declined to be interviewed for this story or an accompanying FRONTLINE documentary set to air Tuesday. He was appointed by the Trump administration in early 2025, but he has never been confirmed by the Senate, raising ongoing questions about the legality of his role as top prosecutor for the region. His office did not respond to detailed questions sent by email.

Like Orellana, Julian Pecora Cardenas, 31, was charged with conspiracy last summer after following a convoy of federal agents in his car.

On the morning of July 5, Pecora Cardenas followed vans full of Border Patrol agents after they left a Coast Guard station in San Pedro, south of Los Angeles, livestreaming their movements on Instagram. “It’s every citizen’s duty to conduct oversight of their government,” he said. “I was within my First Amendment rights.”

After roughly 30 minutes, the agents stopped, pulled Pecora Cardenas from his Hyundai and slammed him to the pavement. “I honestly thought it was going to be like a George Floyd moment,” Pecora Cardenas recalled in an interview, alleging that multiple agents pinned him to the asphalt with their knees. He suffered a concussion, needed stitches over his left eye and wore an orthopedic collar to stabilize his injured neck.

Advertisement

Federal prosecutors charged Pecora Cardenas and another activist with conspiracy to impede the federal agents, saying that they “were illegally maneuvering their vehicles through traffic, stop lights, and stop signs to stay behind the agent’s vehicles,” that they tried to block the Border Patrol vehicles, and that they created “hazardous conditions on the road.”

Pecora Cardenas’ own video of the day’s events told a different story. The footage, which ProPublica and FRONTLINE have reviewed, contradicts the claims that the men had interfered with the agents. Within days of seeing the images, Essayli’s office jettisoned the charges “in the interest of justice.”

Pecora Cardenas hasn’t tried to observe federal agents or participate in a protest since his arrest. “I don’t want to be assaulted again. I don’t want to wind up back in federal prison for something that I didn’t do.”

“They Were Just Randomly Grabbing People”

When Bovino, the Border Patrol chief, left California and took his forces to Illinois last fall, their focus on protesters intensified.

Advertisement

In roughly one month, federal agents arrested more than a hundred American citizens, many of them activists participating in demonstrations or documenting the movements of immigration agents as their convoys of rented SUVs rolled through the streets of Chicago and surrounding communities.

But Justice Department prosecutors in Chicago had less success prosecuting those arrested than their peers in California.

On the morning of Oct. 3, 2025, about two hundred demonstrators gathered near the ICE facility in Broadview, a small town in the western suburbs of Chicago. Tucked away in a quiet industrial park, the nondescript building had become the locus of ongoing protests since Bovino and his forces had arrived in Illinois.

Then-Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem, accompanied by a DHS video team, was on site that day wearing a baseball cap and a black ballistic vest.

Advertisement

Also present was Benny Johnson, a prominent podcaster and online influencer who is close to the Trump administration. Johnson, who had brought his own camera crew to shoot video for his YouTube channel and other social media accounts, was effectively embedded with Noem, Bovino and the immigration agents.

At about 9 a.m., Bovino and a phalanx of heavily armed agents in combat gear began striding down Harvard Street toward the protesters. “Walk slowly,” Bovino told his men.

Without a bullhorn or any sort of amplification, Bovino informed the crowd that they were being dispersed. Then he and his colleagues began shoving people to the ground and arresting them.

In a matter of minutes, a dozen protesters had been handcuffed. Three arrestees interviewed by ProPublica and FRONTLINE told us they were confused because they’d been standing in a “free speech zone” set up by state officials. 

Advertisement

“I felt somebody grab my shoulder and pull me to the ground,” said Juan Muñoz, a business owner and elected leader in nearby Oak Park Township. “And once I fell onto my back, that’s when I saw it was Greg Bovino.”

Kyle Frankovich, a Harvard data scientist and Chicago resident, was also arrested. “They were just randomly grabbing people,” he recalled. “There was nowhere to go, people were falling all over the place, and several of the people they arrested simply had the misfortune of tripping over all of the other protesters” as federal agents surged into the crowd.

Frankovich said FBI agents who questioned him asked who had paid for him to participate in the demonstration and who “covered the transportation cost for you to be here today.”

Johnson’s video team and a DHS camera crew filmed the arrested protesters as they were lined up outside the ICE building, while Noem looked on. DHS posted photos of Frankovich in handcuffs on X and Facebook with the message, “We will NOT allow violent activist to lay hands on our law enforcement.”

Advertisement

Johnson, who has more than more than 4 million followers on X and more than 6 million subscribers on YouTube, posted a video on X panning across the arrested protesters and wrote: “I saw dozens of Democrat domestic terrorists arrested today for VIOLENT ASSAULT on federal law enforcement. Every activist here attacked ICE agents in broad daylight just for enforcing American law.” He made the same claim in a nearly 13-minute-long YouTube video.

Such social media content had become a central feature of the Trump administration’s deportation campaign. DHS, Border Patrol and a raft of allied social media influencers regularly produced slick videos showing agents in action: riding in helicopters, striding through city streets clutching rifles, breaking down doors, and apprehending immigrants and activists. 

But on that day in Chicago, DHS had strayed far from the facts. And so had Johnson, a 38-year-old former journalist who turned to social media after being embroiled in plagiarism scandals at BuzzFeed and the Independent Journal Review. 

After about eight hours in custody, Frankovich, Muñoz and nearly all the others were released without charges. In the end, only one person would be prosecuted.

Advertisement

Neither DHS nor Johnson have taken the posts down. Johnson did not respond to emailed requests for comment.

The lone person charged with a crime that day was Cole Sheridan, who was accused of attacking Bovino and sending him to the hospital with an injured groin muscle.

Sheridan spent three and a half days in jail — “probably the most unpleasant thing I’ve ever had to experience,” he said in an interview with FRONTLINE and ProPublica — before being released.

In court, a prosecutor said that Sheridan had thrown a punch at Bovino and pushed him, transcripts show.

Advertisement

The evidence presented by the Justice Department, though, was slim. Bovino didn’t wear a body camera, so prosecutors relied on video from the body camera of Border Patrol agent Jason Epperson. But it didn’t show Sheridan assaulting anyone — though he did call Bovino “a fucking idiot.” In statements to investigators, Bovino and Epperson had offered conflicting accounts of the encounter.

About a month after Sheridan was arrested, prosecutors moved to dismiss the case after a bystander video surfaced showing clearly that Sheridan hadn’t assaulted Bovino.

“I don’t know if I’ve ever experienced something truly that bizarre and absurd as, like, seeing a law enforcement agent concoct a narrative to arrest me, to press charges against me,” said Sheridan, who describes himself as intensely private and was initially reluctant to talk publicly about his arrest. “That was extremely unnerving.”

He remains worried that he’ll be harassed or even physically attacked because of the inflammatory social media posts about him. “What a farce. Every element of it felt staged,” he said. 

Advertisement

In a statement to ProPublica and FRONTLINE, Chicago U.S. Attorney Andrew Boutros said, “Our willingness to be open-minded and dismiss cases — or not file charges in the first place — reflects our commitment to do the right thing even in those cases where a crime was committed and the conduct in question clearly falls outside any protected First Amendment activity.” He declined to comment directly on Sheridan’s case.

FRONTLINE and ProPublica showed video of Sheridan’s arrest to Lopez, the former Justice Department attorney. “It’s just a gross abuse of power,” she said. “And we’ve almost normalized that this is how federal law enforcement behaves now. They just arrest people.”

Of the 109 arrests that ProPublica and FRONTLINE documented in the Chicago area, federal prosecutors dropped charges in at least 75 cases.

Felony Charges Downgraded

When Bovino and his forces arrived in North Carolina last November, they were greeted by protesters opposed to the deportation sweeps, as they had been in previous cities.

Advertisement

Heather Morrow was one of them. She had joined a small group of demonstrators, chanting and banging on metal dishes outside an immigration facility in Charlotte when ICE officers confronted the group. 

They handcuffed Morrow, 45, and another activist, stuffed them in the back of a federal vehicle and, according to Morrow, kept them there for hours before finally taking her to jail.

“I was so traumatized,” Morrow, a school bus driver and dog boarder, said in an interview. “I didn’t expect them to be so overly aggressive. I really showed up there expecting conversation, making them come to their senses.”

After a full day and night in custody, she was released to face federal felony assault charges. A Department of Justice press release accused her of attacking an ICE officer just as he showed up for his work shift, grabbing his shoulders and trying to jump on his back.

Advertisement

But a shaky phone video circulating on social media showed what appeared to be a very different scene. In it, an officer comes from behind and abruptly tackles Morrow to the pavement. The video doesn’t show her assaulting anyone.

When prosecutors saw the video, they dumped the felony charges. But they promptly filed a new misdemeanor case against Morrow and the other activist, alleging the pair impeded ICE officers and failed to follow their orders. It took a month for Morrow to get her phone back from federal custody, while her other confiscated possessions, including her keys, have been lost, Morrow’s attorney said. Because she’s on pretrial probation, the federal government has seized her passport. Morrow has pleaded not guilty, and her case is ongoing.

In Handcuffs and Intimidated

In early January, Bovino arrived in Minneapolis with his social media team. Within weeks, two activists — Renee Good and Alex Pretti — were shot and killed by immigration agents. The Trump administration immediately portrayed Good as an extremist; Bovino claimed that Pretti was planning to kill federal personnel when he was shot to death.

The killings, which sparked national outcry, would prompt the administration to recalibrate. By Jan. 26, Bovino had been demoted and sent back to his home station in the California desert. 

Advertisement

But immigration agents continued to roam the Twin Cities, and activists continued to get arrested.

Civil rights attorneys from around the country gathered in a Minneapolis conference room on Jan. 30 to discuss those arrests.

During a break for lunch, Jon Feinberg, president of the National Police Accountability Project, stepped out of the room and spoke to reporters. “To be charged with a federal crime is something that is life-altering,” said Feinberg, who is based in Philadelphia. “The consequences of being accused and possibly convicted of a federal offense are devastating, especially when people have not engaged in criminal conduct from any reasonable person’s perspective.”

ProPublica and FRONTLINE have identified nearly 80 arrests stemming from the Minnesota immigration sweeps. Most of the cases are still ongoing, though a handful have been dismissed. 

Advertisement

Daniel Rosen, the U.S. attorney for Minnesota, did not respond to requests for comment.

One of those arrested was Rebecca Ringstrom, who lives in Blaine, a quiet suburb north of Minneapolis.

Ringstrom, 42, is a member of an activist group that tracks immigration agents as they move around Blaine. “There was a vehicle with four agents inside that I could see. All four were in tactical gear,” she said in an interview with ProPublica and FRONTLINE. “I was able to look at the plate and see that it was a confirmed ICE vehicle.”

Behind the wheel of her Kia, she began following them; Ringstrom insists her driving was safe and lawful. But in a matter of minutes, she’d been arrested and accused of interfering with federal law enforcement.

Advertisement

Ringstrom said an agent at the Bishop Henry Whipple Federal Building, where she was briefly held after her arrest, said he wished he’d arrested her — because he would’ve made the experience more unpleasant and violent. “There was no reason to say that. I’m already here. I’m in handcuffs. It’s just a way to intimidate,” she recalled.

She was charged with interfering with a federal agent and issued a notice of violation — essentially a ticket — for the misdemeanor offense. Since then, Ringstrom has lined up a pro bono lawyer, but she has also lost her job, “likely due to the ongoing coverage” of her arrest.

She is scheduled to make her first court appearance later this month. 

Filed Under: 1st amendment, arrests, benny johnson, bill essayli, dhs, donald trump, fbi, free speech, gregory bovino, ice, kristi noem, pretextual arrests, protests

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Tech

How Long Should Michelin Latitude Tour HP Tires Last & Do They Have A Warranty?

Published

on





There’s no shortage of marketing materials trying to convince you to buy Michelin Latitude Tour HP tires. But what about real life? Can drivers really expect the balance of durability, comfort, and great all-season performance that Michelin promises? According to customer reviews, real-world lifespan will vary for these tires depending on your driving habits and specific road conditions.

Latitude Tour HP tires are designed for on-road SUVs and 4×4 vehicles. They use a special “Terrain-Proof” compound, which is said to help resist wear across a wide range of environments. They also have “StabiliGrip Technology,” which is just a fancy way of saying specially positioned sipes for less vibration and noise while you drive.

Advertisement

Michelin’s warranty information says drivers can expect treadwear to last anywhere from 30,000 to 55,000 miles, depending on the tire’s speed rating. (H-rated versions have a 30,000-mile warranty, W-rated models have 45,000 miles, and V- or H-rated versions get up to 55,000 miles.) These are some of the best treadwear ratings in Michelin’s catalog. The numbers give us a good idea of how long the tires are expected to last, but that’s under normal conditions. Actual results will vary depending on things like rotation and alignment.

Advertisement

What people with Latitude Tour HP tires have to say

Mileage-based warranties are one thing, but actual drivers’ experiences are something completely different. The reviews on Michelin’s site paint a much clearer picture of what you can expect to get out of your Latitude Tour HPs. This is a good thing. Plenty of drivers say the tires exceeded expectations, with some sets lasting well beyond 80,000 miles. That’s not to say everybody’s experiences are the same, of course. Some users experienced uneven or premature wear, requiring replacement as early as 40,000 miles. It just goes to show how much real-world durability is influenced by driving style, road conditions, vehicle setup, and even weather.

For when something does go wrong with the tire, Michelin backs the Latitude Tour HP with a comprehensive warranty package beyond the treadwear figures mentioned earlier. They’re also covered by a standard limited warranty for defects in materials and workmanship. That warranty lasts for up to six years post-purchase (or until the usable tread is depleted, whichever comes first). They also fall under the Michelin Promise Plan, which includes a 60-day satisfaction guarantee and free roadside assistance.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

Lenovo Yoga Tab Review – Trusted Reviews

Published

on

Verdict

A great compact tablet for students that doesn’t skimp on performance and includes a brilliant stylus in the box? The Lenovo Yoga Tab has a lot to like.

  • Great, compact size

  • Good performance for the price

  • Stylus included

  • Just three years of updates

  • Bloatware

Key Features

  • Trusted Reviews IconTrusted Reviews Icon

    Advertisement

    Review Price:
    £479

  • Stylus included:

    Advertisement

    Bundled with the Lenovo Tab Pen Pro

  • Quad-speaker setup:

    Advertisement

    Two tweeters and two woofers

  • 3.2K resolution:

    Advertisement

    11.1-inch IPS LCD

Introduction

Tempted by the iPad Air’s set of features, but would rather spend a little less at the checkout? The Lenovo Yoga Tab might be the alternative you’ve been waiting for.

I have to hand it to Lenovo, there aren’t too many companies out there that offer quite the same degree of variety in the world of tablets compared to the likes of Apple and Samsung, but the brand has absolutely no shortage of options to the point where practically every type of budget is catered for.

Advertisement

Sitting below the premium-level Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus, the standard Lenovo Yoga Tab is still a fairly feature-packed tablet, but thanks to a starting price of £479/$549.99, it’s more affordable than crucial options like the iPad Air M4 and the Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE.

Advertisement

Of course, even with a head start on price, the question remains as to whether or not Lenovo can do enough with the Yoga Tab to lure potential adopters.

Despite having reviewed countless tablets from other brands, this is the first Lenovo tablet I’ve ever had the pleasure of testing, and I’ll gladly admit that I should have been paying more attention to the company’s output sooner.

Advertisement

Design

  • Very compact build
  • Only 6.2mm thick
  • Just two colourways available

Being unfamiliar with Lenovo’s design language when it comes to the company’s tablets, I wasn’t too sure what to expect, but I found myself pleasantly surprised from the very first moment that I held the Yoga Tab. This is a slick tablet that brilliantly tows the line of having a decently sized display (11.1 inches) but without ever feeling cumbersome, making it a solid option for some entertainment on the go.

The Lenovo Yoga Tab speakersThe Lenovo Yoga Tab speakers
Image Credit (Trusted Reviews)

Advertisement

At just 6.2mm thick and with a starting weight of only 458g, the Lenovo Yoga Tab, from a pure design perspective, is exactly what I want from a tablet most of the time. Having recently used the excellent OnePlus Pad Go 2, as much as I loved its larger frame for a bit of productivity when working from home, it’s a little too large to be my go-to tablet if I’m travelling and would rather have something compact that can more easily fit into my carry-on luggage, which is exactly what the Yoga Tab can do.

Even though I’ve been using the device without a case for the duration of this review, because the tablet itself is so slim, I don’t think that bringing a case into the mix will diminish its portability in any meaningful way.

However, one feature that I wish the Yoga Tab had pinched from more affordable Lenovo Idea Tabs is a helpful kickstand for easy viewing. I’ve had to constantly prop the Yoga Tab against several objects, but because the backing doesn’t provide a tangible grip, this has often led to me saving the tablet from sliding away at the last second.

There are two colourways available, Seashell and Luna Grey, the former of which I’ve had in for testing. Both models have a semi-professional look about them, so if they are brought into a meeting they won’t look out of place, but I do wish that they had a bit more of a personality to them. Even the iPad Air M4, despite being a more premium tablet, comes with a hint of colour.

Advertisement

For the sake of consistency, however, I’d recommend picking up the Luna Grey option as it’s colour matched with the included Lenovo Tab Pen Pro, creating a better look overall.

The Lenovo Yoga Tab features a small camera bumpThe Lenovo Yoga Tab features a small camera bump
Image Credit (Trusted Reviews)

Advertisement

Screen

  • 11.1-inch IPS LCD panel
  • 3.2K resolution
  • 144Hz refresh rate

As I’ve said before, an 11.1-inch panel is the sweet spot as it’s big enough to provide a far more immersive viewing experience than my smartphone, but it’s not too large as to feel cumbersome in the hand, which can be an issue with larger tablets like the 13-inch iPads and the Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 Ultra.

In terms of the display itself, it packs a 3.2K resolution which helps to keep everything looking crisp, whether that’s on the homescreen or when scrolling through the likes of Netflix and Disney Plus for your next watch. It’s also IPS LCD, so no OLED here, although that isn’t too surprising, as you typically have to spend a bit more in order to enjoy self-lighting pixels on a tablet.

Still, the colours look great, and when diving into my go-to stream of Avengers: Infinity War, I did find myself getting drawn into the action.

The refresh rate can also top out at 144Hz, which is great news for gamers. It’s shown off in its best light when running through a couple of matches in titles like Call of Duty Mobile, but even when giving Balatro a spin (although the game is far from the most taxing one out there), all of the animations and card twists look buttery smooth on this display.

Advertisement

One thing I would have liked to see is a slightly higher brightness than the current peak of 800 nits. It certainly gets the job done in most scenarios, but I did spot a bit of dimming around the edges of the display when viewing webpages with a white background. If you’re coming up from a much older tablet then this probably won’t be noticeable, but I did find the OnePlus Pad Go 2 to be a better performer in the brightness department.

Advertisement

Trusted Reviews homepage on the Lenovo Yoga TabTrusted Reviews homepage on the Lenovo Yoga Tab
Image Credit (Trusted Reviews)

The Yoga Tab’s display is nice and responsive though, which was great to see when I was rearranging apps to have everything set up in just the right multitasking configuration. This also applies to instances of using the Pen Pro, with minimal delay present to make you feel connected with your writing. 

Cameras

  • 13MP main camera
  • The 2MP macro camera feels like an odd addition
  • 13MP front-facing camera

As much as I love tablet computers, their cameras are barely an afterthought in how I use them, and, as ever, I would not recommend choosing a tablet based on the sensors it includes. Still, if you do need to rely on cameras occasionally for scanning a document or jumping into a Zoom call, then you won’t be disappointed with what the Lenovo Yoga Tab has to offer.

On the back, there’s a 13MP wide-angle camera that can take okay pictures if you need a reference point for something, but start zooming into the shots, and you’ll notice that the detail falls apart pretty quickly. As I mentioned before, this camera is far better suited for scanning documents when needed, and I was impressed to see that even on my dimly lit desk, the camera was able to take a decent scan of a document, which could then be tweaked after the fact to distinguish the text a bit better.

Lenovo Yoga Tab picture sampleLenovo Yoga Tab picture sample
Image Credit (Trusted Reviews)

Advertisement

What I can’t quite wrap my head around is the inclusion of a secondary 2MP macro camera on the rear. This is exactly the type of useless feature that the Lenovo Yoga Tab could have done without, as it would have been much nicer to see Lenovo’s efforts focused elsewhere, or to have the price be just a tad more affordable.

Advertisement

At the very least, the front-facing 13MP ultra-wide camera does a great job of capturing everything around you, so if you and several other people near you want to hop onto a video call, there’s a good chance that you’ll all appear on the screen without any need for jostling.

Performance

  • Solid power from the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
  • Gaming works like a charm
  • Tremendous speakers

Powering the Lenovo Yoga Tab is the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 chipset which, despite being a few years old now, is still capable of fairly impressive performance. After all, this is the same chipset that used to be reserved for flagship phones, including the Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra.

I did encounter a slight slowdown during the early phase of using the tablet, whilst everything was installing in the background, with the whole thing freezing on me for a few seconds before responding, but beyond that initial period, I have very much enjoyed my time with the Lenovo Yoga Tab.

Call of Duty Mobile on the Lenovo Yoga TabCall of Duty Mobile on the Lenovo Yoga Tab
Image Credit (Trusted Reviews)

Advertisement

Because of the relatively compact size of the device, I’ve enjoyed catching up on the latest headlines, scrolling through the BBC News website with ease, as well as constantly jumping back and forth between the likes of Amazon, Currys and John Lewis on the hunt for any tech or gaming deals I can get my hands on.

When I fancied a bit of interactive entertainment, I was able to connect an Xbox controller over Bluetooth and absolutely decimate my way through a round of Call of Duty: Mobile (anyone using touchscreen controls didn’t stand a chance). Everything ran smoothly, and I didn’t pick up on any instances of lag or screen tearing, something which was partially helped by the 144Hz refresh rate.

Advertisement

Multitasking is also handled incredibly well on the Lenovo Yoga Tab, with my typical use case of having Google Docs open next to the Chrome browser proving to be no issue whatsoever. When pushing it a bit further, I was even more impressed in having BBC News open on one side, Balatro playing on another, and a windowed Disney Plus stream in the corner, all without the tablet buckling. If you’re a student who needs a bit of distraction as you revise, this set-up is perfect.

Test Data

  Lenovo Yoga Tab OnePlus Pad Go 2 Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE Plus
Geekbench 6 single core 2220 1003 1230
Geekbench 6 multi core 5758 3082 3545
Geekbench 6 GPU 13300 2602
3D Mark – Wild Life 4445 874 1348
3D Mark – Wild Life Stress Test 3893 % 98.8 %

The only area where I saw limitations in the chipset was when playing more demanding 3D titles. To the Yoga Tab’s credit, it handled the exploration sections of Honkai Star Rail rather well, but it was in the game’s battles that I would spot the occasional frame jump. Still, that’s not bad for a tablet of this price, and unless you’re a serious gamer, I don’t think you’re going to hit the performance ceiling of this tablet very often (if at all).

Multitasking on the Lenovo Yoga TabMultitasking on the Lenovo Yoga Tab
Image Credit (Trusted Reviews)

Advertisement

Saving the best for last, what really gave me pause about this tablet is its speakers. I didn’t anticipate anything special from a tablet this compact, but the quad-firing set-up provides one of the best soundscapes I’ve ever come across in a tablet. Getting to run through my usual test streams has been an absolute joy, and there’s a serious amount of weight provided. If you’re on the road and the Lenovo Yoga Tab is your only source of entertainment, then I don’t think you’ll be disappointed.

Software

  • Android with the Lenovo ZUI overlay
  • An unfortunate amount of bloatware
  • Just three major software updates

As far as the user experience goes, the Yoga Tab uses Lenovo ZUI, and although this was my first experience with this specific Android overlay, I will say that I grew to like it over the course of the testing period. The UI isn’t quite as stylish as OnePlus’ Oxygen OS, but everything is clearly labelled which I appreciated.

For example, you can easily dive into a bit of multitasking by tapping on the three dots that sit at the top of an app, wherein you can have apps sit side by side or have several windowed apps around the screen. Unfortunately you can’t do 90/10 multitasking wherein a second app sits largely out of the way on the side of the display, but can be called upon quickly with a single tap, so it’s not quite as robust an experience as what you’ll find with Open Canvas on OnePlus tablets.

Advertisement

Still, Lenovo’s approach to simplicity also carries over to the quick-access controls for the Pen Pro, wherein you can jot down notes, use Google’s Circle to Search or scribble on a screenshot of whatever’s on the display. I’m not typically a fan of using stylus pens on tablets either, but with the way the software is laid out and the Pen’s very satisfying haptic feedback, I found myself picking it up fairly often.

Quick settings for the Pen Pro on the Lenovo Yoga TabQuick settings for the Pen Pro on the Lenovo Yoga Tab
Image Credit (Trusted Reviews)

Advertisement

Instead of having Google News pop up when swiping right from the homescreen, you’re greeted with an entertainment hub that’s mostly centred around Google services. By default, the first thing you see is a Google TV dashboard which collates all of your key streaming services, but you can also access your library of Google Play Store games and any purchased Google Play Books.

Personally, I could do without most of those options, but having quick access to Google TV is great, especially as it cuts down on needing to jump from one streaming app to another in search of what you want to watch.

What I didn’t appreciate seeing was a decent amount of bloatware preinstalled on the device. Before I ever started downloading my own apps, the likes of Adobe Express, CapCut and Perplexity were already present, alongside (strangely enough) two separate drawing/painting apps. It’s something I fully expect to see at the budget end of the market, but at £479 the Yoga Tab is much closer to the mid-range sector.

Advertisement

Even with the bloatware at play, what really stands out as a major knock against the Yoga Tab is that it only carries a promise of three OS updates from the time of launch. Usability is extended slightly by four years of security updates, but it’s not great when you consider that Apple and Samsung offer far in excess of that, so if you don’t want to upgrade your tablet in just a few years, then I recommend looking elsewhere.

Battery life

  • 8660mAh cell
  • 45W charging
  • Charges to full in one hour and 28 minutes

If you do plan on using the Lenovo Yoga Tab either as a productivity device or for getting through your studies, you won’t have much to worry about in terms of battery life. There’s a sizeable 8860mAh silicon carbon cell crammed into this tablet, impressive given its slim build, but it’s meant that I haven’t ever really had to worry about topping it up as I’ve gone about my day.

Advertisement

The battery settings of the Lenovo Yoga TabThe battery settings of the Lenovo Yoga Tab
Image Credit (Trusted Reviews)

You can get a larger 10200mAh battery by opting for the more expensive Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus, but unless you really plan on spending hours editing high-quality videos in LumaFusion or CapCut, I don’t think you’ll need the extra grunt.

Charging is also set at 45W, which is fair for a tablet of this price. It’s the same charging speed as the more expensive Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE, although if battery is your main concern, then you can get 66W charging (and a bigger cell) on the Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro.

When using a 65W charger, which effectively allows the Yoga Tab to reach its 45W capacity, it took only 1 hour and 28 minutes to reach a full charge, which isn’t bad. Getting to the 50% mark only took 43 minutes, so if you’re in a rush, then you can get back enough juice to get you through a few lectures.

Advertisement

Should you buy it?

You need a compact tablet for university

With good speeds, a stylus included and a slim build that’s easy to carry around, the Lenovo Yoga Tab is a great option for students.

Advertisement

You want a tablet for the long haul

With just three years of software updates provided by Lenovo, the Yoga Tab doesn’t offer the same type of futureproofing as you’ll find with Samsung devices.

Advertisement

Advertisement

Final Thoughts

As someone who spent most of their undergraduate and postgraduate years preferring to use a tablet rather than a laptop, the Lenovo Yoga Tab is exactly the type of device I would have loved to have during my studies. This isn’t to say that adults won’t enjoy using this tablet, only that I think the Yoga Tab excels best as an all-in-one device for students.

Advertisement

The Snapdragon chipset makes multitasking very easy, and with a stylus included, you can take down handwritten notes in a pinch – perfect for when you’re brainstorming with a study group. When you’re ready to call it a day, it’s the combination of quick access to Google TV and the surprisingly powerful built-in speakers that allow the Yoga Tab to work just as well as an entertainment device.

Above all though, it’s the compact nature of this tablet that makes it feel very inviting to use. The lightweight stature makes it simple enough to carry one-handed, and you’ll barely notice its presence when flung in a backpack.

I do wish that the tablet came with a longer period of software support, and the presence of bloatware does make the experience feel a little less premium than the competition. The iPad Air M4 and the Samsung Galaxy S10 FE Plus remedy both of these issues, but they do cost a bit more than Lenovo’s tablet. Alternatively, if you want a great productivity tablet for less than the OnePlus Pad Go 2 is also worth a look.

If you still haven’t made up your mind then check out our guide to the best tablets.

Advertisement

How We Test

We test every mobile phone we review thoroughly. We use industry-standard tests to compare features properly and we use the phone as our main device over the review period. We’ll always tell you what we find and we never, ever, accept money to review a product.

  • Used as a main tablet for over a week
    Tested and benchmarked using respected industry tests and real-world data

FAQs

Does the Lenovo Yoga Tab come with a stylus and keyboard?

There is a stylus included by default with the Lenovo Yoga Tab, but you’ll have to pay more for a bundle that also includes a keyboard case.

Advertisement

Test Data

  Lenovo Yoga Tab
Geekbench 6 single core 2220
Geekbench 6 multi core 5758
Geekbench 6 GPU 13300
3DMark Solar Bay 8083
AI performance 3622
Time from 0-100% charge 98 min
30-min recharge (included charger) 35 %
15-min recharge (included charger) 18 %
3D Mark – Wild Life 4445
3D Mark – Wild Life Stress Test 3893 %

Full Specs

  Lenovo Yoga Tab Review
UK RRP £479
USA RRP $549.99
Manufacturer Lenovo
Screen Size 11.1 inches
Storage Capacity 256GB
Rear Camera 13MP wide, 2MP macro
Front Camera 13MP
Video Recording Yes
IP rating Not Disclosed
Battery 8660 mAh
Size (Dimensions) 255.5 x 165.8 x 8.3 INCHES
Weight 458 G
Operating System Android 16
Release Date 2025
First Reviewed Date 09/04/2026
Resolution 3200 x 2000
Refresh Rate 144 Hz
Ports USB-C
Chipset Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
RAM 12GB
Colours Luna Grey, Seashell

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

PowerLight’s laser power beaming system keeps a drone in the air for hours during Pentagon test flights

Published

on

A KHA K1000ULE drone receives power via PowerLight’s laser power beaming system during a flight test. (PowerLight Photo)

Kent, Wash.-based PowerLight Technologies says its laser power beaming system has been used successfully to keep a military-grade, fixed-wing drone in the air for hours during a series of tests for the Department of Defense.

The flight demonstrations concluded this month at the Poinsett Electronic Combat Range at Shaw Air Force Base, S.C. The tests were conducted in partnership with Kraus Hamdani Aerospace, sponsored by U.S. Central Command and the Pentagon’s Operational Energy – Innovation Directorate.

PowerLight’s wireless power transmitter is set up at Poinsett Electronic Combat Range for flight tests. (PowerLight Photo)

PowerLight’s system was installed on a KHA K1000ULE drone, which operates under a recently awarded $270 million deployment contract from the AFCENT Battle Lab. The flight tests demonstrated end-to-end operation of a kilowatt-class wireless power system, from target acquisition and precision tracking through beam delivery and safety management.

During the tests, the beaming system acquired and tracked the drone at altitudes up to 5,000 feet, delivering power while steering and focusing the infrared laser beam in real time.

PowerLight, formerly known as LaserMotive, started out more than 15 years ago with power-beaming systems capable of keeping small quadcopters in the air continuously. The latest tests marked the first demonstration of a wireless system capable of sustained, autonomous power delivery at operationally relevant ranges and power levels for a large, fixed-wing military drone.

Currently, such drones must land to refuel or recharge once their onboard power source is depleted. Continuous wireless power could theoretically keep them airborne indefinitely.

Advertisement

PowerLight’s system was developed through the Power Transmitted Over Laser to Uncrewed Aircraft Systems program, or PTROL-UAS, sponsored in part by U.S. Central Command.

“The Poinsett Range demos prove what we built, and set the stage for the roadmap for this capability that scales from a single transmitter to a distributed network, increasing power output, altitude and range, sustaining multiple aircraft simultaneously across a theater,” PowerLight Technologies CEO Tim Jenks said today in a news release.

Jenks pointed out that PowerLight’s technology could also be used to counter enemy drones. “The same autonomous targeting, precision beam control and real-time system intelligence that keeps a friendly platform aloft has direct applicability to directed-energy counter-UAS strategies,” he said.

In addition to its work for the Department of Defense, PowerLight has worked on systems that could transmit power to 5G base stations, underwater robotic vehicles and lunar rovers.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

OpenAI Codex Chronicle captures your Mac screen to build AI context, with cloud processing and no encryption

Published

on

Summary: OpenAI’s Codex for Mac has added Chronicle, a research preview feature that periodically captures screenshots, sends them to OpenAI’s servers for processing, and stores text summaries as local unencrypted Markdown files to give the AI assistant passive context about user activity. The feature is unavailable in the EU, UK, and Switzerland, requires a $100+/month Pro subscription and Apple Silicon, and represents OpenAI’s first implementation of ambient screen-aware AI on desktop, choosing cloud processing and utility over the local-first privacy architecture adopted by competitors like Screenpipe and the now-defunct Rewind AI.

OpenAI’s Codex desktop app for Mac has gained a feature called Chronicle that periodically captures your screen, processes the content into text summaries, and stores those summaries as local memory files that give the AI assistant context about what you have been working on. The feature, released as a research preview, means Codex can now understand your recent activity without you having to explain it. It also means OpenAI is sending screenshots of your desktop to its servers for processing, a design choice that puts Chronicle in direct tension with the privacy-first direction that much of the industry has been moving toward.

Chronicle is part of a broader update that transformed Codex from a coding assistant into a general-purpose AI workspace. The 16 April release, titled “Codex for (almost) everything,” added computer use capabilities that allow Codex to operate Mac apps with its own cursor, an in-app browser, image generation, persistent memory, and more than 90 plugins. Over one million developers have used Codex, and usage doubled following the launch of the GPT-5.2-Codex model in December.

How Chronicle works

Chronicle runs background agents that periodically capture screenshots of your display. Those screenshots are sent to OpenAI’s servers, where they are processed using OCR and visual analysis to generate text summaries. The summaries are saved as Markdown files in a local directory at ~/.codex/memories_extensions/chronicle/. When you subsequently prompt Codex, those memory files are included in its context window, allowing it to understand what applications you were using, what documents you were reading, what code you were writing, and what conversations you were having, all without you restating any of it.

Advertisement

The raw screen captures are stored temporarily under a system temp directory and automatically deleted after six hours. OpenAI states that screenshots are not stored on its servers after processing and are not used for training. The generated memories, however, persist indefinitely as unencrypted plain text files on your machine.

Advertisement

Greg Brockman, OpenAI’s president, described the feature as “an experimental feature giving Codex the ability to see and have recent memory over what you see, automatically giving it full context on what you’re doing. Feels surprisingly magical to use.”

The privacy architecture

Chronicle requires macOS Screen Recording and Accessibility permissions. It is available only on Apple Silicon Macs running macOS 14 or later, and only to ChatGPT Pro subscribers paying $100 or more per month. It is not available in the EU, UK, or Switzerland, a geographic restriction that strongly suggests OpenAI recognises the feature’s incompatibility with GDPR’s requirements around data minimisation and purpose limitation.

The comparison with Microsoft Recall is instructive. Recall, which launched on Windows Copilot+ PCs, takes screenshots every few seconds and stores them in an encrypted local database, with all processing handled by a neural processing unit on the device. No screenshot data leaves the machine. Chronicle takes the opposite approach: processing happens in the cloud, but only text summaries are retained locally. Recall encrypts its database and requires biometric authentication via Windows Hello. Chronicle stores its memories as unencrypted Markdown files accessible to any process running on the computer.

OpenAI’s own documentation acknowledges the risks explicitly. Chronicle “increases risk of prompt injection” because malicious content on a website you visit could be captured in a screenshot and interpreted as instructions by the AI. The memories directory “might contain sensitive information.” And the feature “uses rate limits quickly,” meaning Pro subscribers may find their Codex usage constrained by Chronicle’s background activity.

Advertisement

OpenAI recommends pausing Chronicle before meetings or when viewing sensitive content. Users can pause and resume via the Codex menu bar icon. The recommendation is itself revealing: it acknowledges that the feature will capture things it should not, and shifts the burden of managing that risk to the user.

The category and its casualties

Screen-aware AI assistants have had a turbulent history. Rewind AI, the most prominent early entrant, rebranded to Limitless before being acquired by Meta in December 2025. The Mac app was shut down and screen capture disabled. Microsoft’s Copilot has lost 39% of its subscribers in six months, partly due to trust issues that extend to Recall. A security researcher demonstrated in early 2026 that Recall’s encrypted database could still be exploited, reinforcing concerns that had dogged the feature since its announcement.

The open-source alternative Screenpipe offers a local-first approach: continuous screen and audio capture processed entirely on-device, with a $400 lifetime licence and no recurring cloud dependency. Perplexity’s Personal Computer software takes yet another approach, turning a Mac mini into a persistent AI agent with access to local files and apps, though it too relies on cloud processing for its core intelligence.

The pattern across the category is consistent: the more useful a screen-aware AI becomes, the more data it needs to process, and the harder it becomes to reconcile that data appetite with user privacy. Chronicle opts for utility over privacy architecture, betting that OpenAI’s promise not to store or train on the data, combined with the six-hour deletion window, is sufficient to earn user trust. Whether that bet pays off depends entirely on whether users believe the promise and whether OpenAI can maintain it as the feature scales.

Advertisement

The ambient computing context

Chronicle arrives as the industry converges on the idea that AI assistants should understand your context without being told. Apple is testing AI smart glasses designed as ambient input channels for Apple Intelligence. Slack’s recent AI overhaul turned Slackbot into a desktop agent with deep context about your work communications. OpenAI itself is developing a screenless hardware device with Jony Ive that is explicitly positioned for an “ambient AI” era. Gartner predicts more than 40% of large enterprises will deploy ambient intelligence pilots by 2026.

The thesis is that AI becomes dramatically more useful when it has passive, continuous access to what you are doing rather than requiring you to articulate your needs from scratch each time. Chronicle is OpenAI’s first implementation of that thesis on desktop, and it works: by Brockman’s account and the feature’s design, eliminating the need to re-explain context to an AI assistant is a genuine productivity gain.

But the thesis has a cost. Privacy-first alternatives like Proton’s AI tools demonstrate that useful AI can run on open-source models locally without sending user data to anyone’s servers. The question Chronicle poses is not whether screen-aware AI is useful. It plainly is. The question is whether the cloud-processed, trust-dependent model that OpenAI has chosen will survive contact with the regulatory environment that has already excluded it from three jurisdictions, and with users who have watched enough AI companies promise data privacy only to quietly revise their terms when the economics demanded it.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

AIM Centre strengthening medtech and life sciences link with new Galway base

Published

on

For the first time, AIM is expanding beyond its Sligo-based headquarters, to target additional ‘industry clusters’ in the west of Ireland.

The Advancing Innovation in Manufacturing (AIM) Centre in Sligo, which is a collaborative partnership between the Atlantic Technological University, Sligo County Council and Leitrim County Council, has announced an expansion with a new Galway base of operations. 

The AIM Centre intends to strengthen its links within the medtech and life sciences sectors and for the first time will expand outside of Sligo. The centre is also currently recruiting for specialist roles in both the Galway and Sligo facilities. 

AIM focuses on business transformation, supporting companies across manufacturing operations, supply chain, HR, legal, energy, data and decision-making. The centre also supports the services sector, “recognising the increasing demand for practical AI adoption and data-driven transformation beyond manufacturing”.

Advertisement

The expansion was supported by the Western Development Commission, with the new base to be located out of Wellpark Road in Galway city. AIM has stated that the decision to join the hubs is part of the organisation’s “growth strategy, a key plank of which is developing links with key industry clusters”.

As part of the expansion, AIM is planning a range of events intended to boost engagement in Galway in the coming months. For example, towards the end of April, the organisation will have a stand at the Dexcom Stadium for the MedTech Innovation expo, bringing together exhibitors and expert speakers to showcase new technologies and research in the healthcare space. 

AIM Centre will also be in attendance at the AtlanTec Festival conference in May. Tech companies from the AtlanTec Gateway and globally, will be present throughout the festival, demonstrating how technology is transforming businesses and society.

Commenting on the announcement, David Bermingham, the director of AI at AIM Centre, said: “The move to open our first Galway hub is designed to strengthen our national reach. We already work with companies across Ireland, but having a base in Galway allows us to be closer to key sectors like medtech and life sciences, where there is strong demand for what we do.

Advertisement

“The AIM Centre’s strength is that we look at the entire business. We work with companies to understand where AI and digital technologies can deliver real impact, from operations and energy through to strategy and decision-making. It’s not about technology for the sake of it. It’s about solving real business problems. We are also seeing growing demand from the services sector, and this expansion allows us to support a broader range of organisations in adopting AI in a practical and meaningful way.”

Méabh Conaghan, the regional director at Enterprise Ireland, added: “Enterprise Ireland is committed to supporting Irish companies to adopt digital and AI technologies that enhance productivity, competitiveness and sustainability. 

“The expansion of the AIM Centre to collaborate with CREW in Galway, another regional enterprise development centre, strengthens the regional and national AI support ecosystem. This development will bring expertise closer to key industrial clusters while continuing to support manufacturers and services companies nationwide in applying AI in a practical way.”

Don’t miss out on the knowledge you need to succeed. Sign up for the Daily Brief, Silicon Republic’s digest of need-to-know sci-tech news.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

7 Cool Lowe’s Gadgets Under $25 That Deserve A Spot In Your Garage

Published

on





For some, there’s no better way to spend an afternoon than window shopping (and maybe buying something) at the hardware store. If you’ve got a few bucks burning a hole in your pocket and you’re looking for a little direction, you’re in the right place.

These aren’t just products with a price tag under $25 that Lowe’s happens to sell. They are tools you might wish you had sooner, or include useful features you may not have seen, but that’s not all. Each product had to meet several criteria (including but not limited to positive user comments) to be included.

Maybe you want to expand your collection of tools and DIY accessories, or you’re trying to find a gift for the tool lover in your life on a budget. With a budget of just $25 and a trip to your local Lowe’s, you could walk out with something pretty cool. Here are seven affordable options to get you started.

Advertisement

Stud finder with WireWarning

In your garage, you might be putting up shelves, mounting pegboards, hanging heavy tools, and more. There are half a hundred reasons you may need to find a stud hidden inside your walls. That’s where a stud finder comes in handy.

Advertisement

The Zircon StudSensor L50 stud finder runs on a single 9V battery and can find wooden or metal studs up to 3/4 inch behind your walls. It also has a feature called WireWarning, which can detect live, unshielded AC wires up to 2 inches deep, so you don’t accidentally drill into them and cause an electrical problem or an injury.

The StudSensor L50 also has a feature called Spotlight Pointer. When the sensor detects the edge of a stud, it beeps, and the stud’s location appears on an enhanced LCD display. Meanwhile, the Spotlight Pointer shines a light in the shape of an arrow, so you know where to mark the edge. As long as you know how to use a stud finder, it can help you hang heavy things with confidence and ease.

Advertisement

Long tape measure

Most major brands make measuring tapes with rigid tape and a limited range. If you’ve got an ordinary tape measure in your tool set, there’s a good chance it’s 25 feet or shorter. That’s long enough for small projects, but you might run into trouble if, for instance, you’re trying to measure your home’s exterior walls before buying paint.

The Kobalt 100-foot tape measure is more flexible and winds into the handle between uses. Not only can this tool measure much larger objects and spaces, but the flexibility also means you can use it to measure curved or irregular surfaces, and that’s not all.

A nylon coating protects the tape measure from wear and tear, while ground stakes let you secure the end of the tape and take your own measurements. This tape measure features a high-visibility design so you can see your measurements from a distance. Markings are printed on both sides, so you’ll still be able to see your results even if the tape measure gets twisted.

Advertisement

Adjustable square

As the name suggests, a regular square lets you check for 90-degree, or square, angles. An adjustable square, also known as a T-Bevel, serves a similar purpose, but can be adjusted to measure a wide range of angles.

Advertisement

You don’t necessarily need exact measurements when you’re building a treehouse or slapping something together for personal use, but if you’re building things that have a very low tolerance for misalignment, a square and angle finder can be a game-changer. You can measure inside angles and outside angles according to your needs.

The Johnson Level aluminum adjustable square is designed to last a long time. Its handle is made of solid aluminum with an angle measuring blade made of stainless steel to minimize rusting. The handle and blade are attached with a locking bolt, so that when you’ve made your measurement, you can lock it into place and transfer those angles to your other materials to ensure they line up.

Advertisement

Laser distance measurer

This pen-style measuring tool uses light to determine the distance between itself and another object. When you make a measurement, a laser beam fires out of the front of the tool. The beam travels at the speed of light until it encounters something like, for instance, the opposite wall of your living room. When the bounced light comes back, it strikes a sensor, and the tool determines the amount of time between when the light left and when it returned. It compares the time traveled to the speed of light and, presto, you’ve got your distance.

The WEN indoor laser distance measurer can measure distances between 1.7 feet and 32 feet with a variance of only a 1/4 inch or less. Measurements are calculated from the back of the tool, so you can put it up against one wall and measure the distance to the next.

A digital display shows you the laser’s battery level and your measurement results. It has just a single button that controls everything. Pressing the button once turns the laser on; pressing it again takes a measurement. Pressing and holding the button lets you choose either metric units or feet and inches. It automatically turns off after two minutes.

Advertisement

Inspection penlight and laser

Pointing a finger is a famously poor way of showing someone what you’re looking at, especially when you’re dealing with small parts, complex objects, or when there are many objects in roughly the same space. The Klein Tools inspection penlight offers a solution to that problem.

Advertisement

This small inspection light offers 70 lumens to shine light into dark areas, but that’s not all. The laser mounted to the top shows up inside the illuminated space, so you can pinpoint exactly what you’re looking at. An aluminum construction and textured finish offer IP54 dust and water resistance, a better grip, and 10 feet of drop protection.

It has a removable pocket clip, like you’d find on the side of a ballpoint pen, for easy storage between uses. It’s ready to use right out of the box, and you can get 10 hours of use from the pair of AAA batteries pre-installed in the penlight. Perhaps the best feature, or at least the coolest, is the ring around the front of the light. It’s made of a similar material to the glowing stars kids put on their bedroom ceilings. The ring charges when the penlight is on, then glows so you can find it if you drop it in the dark.

Advertisement

Digital display multimeter

A multimeter can measure various electrical aspects for a variety of professional or DIY jobs. You can use one to make sure the power is off so you don’t get electrocuted on the job. A multimeter can also be used to identify the root of a problem in your car, in your house, and elsewhere. For instance, if one electrical outlet has power and the next one doesn’t, there’s a good chance the problem is somewhere between those two points.

The Kobalt digital display multimeter can measure AC and DC power and test the leads on different types of batteries. It has seven available functions and 16 ranges, allowing you to measure voltage, current, and resistance. It should be noted that you might have problems at extreme temperatures (below 14 degrees and above 140 degrees Fahrenheit) or when the relative humidity rises above 70%.

The multimeter comes with a 12V battery pre-installed and test leads to take measurements. The power button turns it on or off, and the hold button freezes the current reading on the screen when you press it once. Pressing it again will clear the screen so you can make another measurement. Just make sure to follow all safety protocols whenever working with electricity. When one mistake could be your last, it’s best not to make any.

Advertisement

Under cabinet lights

It’s not uncommon for a person’s garage to be poorly lit. Often, the garage door opener might be the only light in the space. If you’re looking to add more light to your workshop, the Utilitech under-cabinet lights could be a good place to start.

Advertisement

They come in 10-inch, 18-inch, and 24-inch sizes, and you can choose a package with either two or four lights. Built-in magnets let the lights attach to metal surfaces without tools or much effort. The under-cabinet lights can be mounted to other types of surfaces with the included adhesive backing. A small dome next to the light contains a PIR (passive infrared) sensor for motion detection and a battery charging light.

Each light offers a bar of white light, and you can adjust the color temperature with a button on the side. The lights are powered by rechargeable batteries using a simple USB-C cable. If you leave the light on constantly, you’ll get between eight and 10 hours on a single charge. If, instead, you use the motion sensor function, it could be as much as a month between charges.

Advertisement

Methodology, how we made our choices

Every product on this list had to pass through several gates in order to be included. The first gate is relatively straightforward and apparent in the title. Anything over $25 (before tax) was ineligible for inclusion.

The second gate was a little bit tougher; to be included, a product had to be something the average person might not have. Or, at the least, includes features that are atypical and useful. We’re sure you can find plenty of cool tools and products under $25, but you’re not here to hear that you should have a hammer. You already know that, and you (probably) already have one. It also had to be useful. Just because most people don’t have a product doesn’t mean they need it.

Finally, each product had to have someone (or a lot of someones) vouch for it. In some cases, that means a SlashGear author has used the tool and found it to be worth recommending. If someone at SlashGear can’t vouch for a product, we look to people who have used and reviewed it. To make the cut, a product had to have at least 100 reviews (usually many more) and an average rating of at least 4.0 stars.

Advertisement



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Tech

Former advisor to Steve Jobs says new Apple CEO is exactly what’s needed: an engineer from the inside

Published

on

John Ternus, left, and Tim Cook at Apple Park. (Apple Photo)

Tim Cook’s plan to step down as Apple’s CEO, announced Monday, will put the tech giant in the hands of a hardware engineer, John Ternus, returning Apple’s top job to its product roots after nearly 15 years under a leader who made his mark in operations and supply chain.

It’s the right call, said Mike Slade, a Seattle tech veteran who spent six years as an advisor to Steve Jobs at the company. Apple needed to pick an insider who understands the culture, Slade said, and ideally someone who knows how hardware comes together, inside and out. 

Ternus checks both boxes. 

“Apple’s the last company left where there are people that know how to build computers, in the U.S., at least,” Slade said. “If you know that, you have an unfair, intuitive ability to know what’s possible. That’s how crazy things like the iPod and the iPhone came to be.”

Ternus, 50, joined Apple in 2001 and has been there ever since, rising from the product design team to senior vice president of hardware engineering. He has overseen hardware across every major product line, including iPhone, Mac, iPad, and AirPods.

Advertisement

Cook, 65, announced Monday that he will become executive chairman on Sept. 1, when Ternus takes over as CEO of the Cupertino, Calif., company. The transition ends one of the most successful tenures in the history of corporate America: under Cook, Apple’s market cap grew roughly tenfold, and by literally trillions of dollars, from about $350 billion to $4 trillion. 

Slade, a co-founder of Seattle venture capital firm Second Avenue Partners, started his career at Microsoft in 1983 and later ran Starwave, Paul Allen’s internet media company, which sold to Disney. He served as an advisor to Apple and Jobs on product and marketing strategy from 1998 to 2004, attending Apple executive meetings and working with both Jobs and Cook.

We’ve known Slade for years through Seattle’s tech community, and got in touch with him after seeing him quoted in the New York Times’ coverage of Cook’s departure. In that piece, he called Cook’s legacy one of “continuous improvement in every aspect and fantastic new products.”

Speaking with GeekWire via phone, Slade noted that he had recently been running the numbers on the market value of Microsoft and Apple under different leaders. Cook stands out for having grown Apple’s value from $350 billion to more than $4 trillion during his tenure, more than a 10-fold increase.

Advertisement

Throughout its history, he noted, Apple has rarely been a first mover in hardware. Music players, cell phones, and VR headsets all existed before Apple got to them.

“They just weren’t very good,” he said. “Apple made them good.”

That’s exactly the skill set a hardware engineer brings to the CEO role, he said. 

Steven Sinofsky, the former Microsoft Windows and Office chief, called Cook’s run as Apple CEO “just an incredible incredible tenure,” writing on X that Cook accomplished “the rare combination of improved execution and strategic innovation.” 

Advertisement

But the biggest question facing Ternus is one that dogged Cook in his final years: what to do about artificial intelligence. Apple has largely watched from the sidelines as rivals poured hundreds of billions into AI, and its own efforts, including a delayed Siri overhaul, have stumbled. Its AI chief, John Giannandrea, left last year after being gradually sidelined.

Alex Zenla, co-founder and CTO of Edera, a Seattle-based container and AI security startup, said Apple’s strength in recent years has been hardware, driven by Apple Silicon and a reversal of past missteps like over-thinning of Apple hardware.

Ternus oversaw many of those changes, she pointed out, making him a natural fit for the top job. Apple invested early in on-device AI through its Neural Engine, Zenla noted, and that positions a hardware-minded CEO well for what’s ahead.

“If Apple wants to shine with Apple Intelligence, hardware will continue to be at the forefront of their strategy, and ultimately I believe that bet will pay off,” Zenla said via email.

Advertisement

Zenla also praised Cook’s legacy on a personal level, calling him a source of pride as a fellow Alabama native and one of corporate America’s most prominent gay executives. 

Slade said he doesn’t think AI is Apple’s problem to solve. The company’s edge, in his view, is building the hardware that AI runs on, and for that, you want an engineer at the top.

“I think the people who are going to be best at AI are not going to be Microsoft or Apple or Google or Amazon,” Slade said. Instead, he said, it will be companies like OpenAI and Anthropic that have been singularly focused on the technology.

Cook will remain involved as executive chairman, and Slade said that’s an important aspect of the announcement. The corporate and political sides of running Apple are areas where Ternus may not have deep experience, and Cook isn’t going anywhere.

Advertisement

But the core of the job is product, Slade said, and that’s where Ternus fits.

If he’d been asked in advance who Apple should pick, Slade said, his answer would have been simple: Pick an internal person who understands product. “So there you go,” he said.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Tech

Mobile Phones To Be Banned In Schools In England Under New Plans

Published

on

An anonymous reader quotes a report from the Guardian: A ban on mobile phones in schools in England is to be introduced by the government to ensure that “critical safeguarding legislation” is passed. The government will table an amendment to the children’s wellbeing and schools bill in the House of Lords after the bill was held up by peers on opposition benches. It will make existing guidance on mobile phone bans in schools statutory, a move that ministers have resisted until now.

The government had consistently argued that the vast majority of schools had already banned mobile phones, and that there was no need to add a legal requirement. They finally capitulated, however, describing it as “a pragmatic measure” to get the bill through. […] The bill is regarded by many as the biggest piece of child protection legislation in decades and includes proposals for a compulsory register for children who are not in school, a crackdown on profiteering in children’s social care, and a “single unique identifier” to help agencies track a child’s welfare.

Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

Palantir Goes Mask-Off For Fascism. It Won’t End Well.

Published

on

from the a-very-bad-bet dept

Earlier this month, Donald Trump posted on Truth Social that “Palantir Technologies (PLTR) has proven to have great war fighting capabilities and equipment. Just ask our enemies!!!” — notably including the stock ticker, because why not just make the market manipulation explicit.

The stock popped after that and has continued to rise in the past couple weeks, though it’s still down on the year.

Welcome to patronage capitalism with a stock ticker attached.

Last year, we wrote about the disturbing trend of tech founders and VCs nodding along to the neoreactionary pitch that democracy is holding back innovation, and that what the industry really needs is a “tech-friendly” strongman to sweep away institutional guardrails. We argued this was both morally bankrupt and strategically suicidal, since real innovation requires exactly the kind of stable, open, competitive institutions that authoritarianism systematically destroys.

Palantir has apparently decided to volunteer as the case study. Palantir — the very company whose entire sales pitch is built around using technology to make better strategic decisions and predict how things will play out.

Advertisement

But now the company seems to be betting that Trumpist-flavored authoritarianism is a permanent feature of the American political landscape — and that going all-in on it will never, ever have any long-term consequences.

Over the weekend, the company’s official account posted what it called a “brief” 22-point summary of CEO Alex Karp’s book The Technological Republic, framed as an introduction to the “philosophy” behind Palantir’s work. Most of it is a reheated version of the familiar Thiel-adjacent playbook — Silicon Valley owes a debt to the country, we must build AI weapons before our adversaries do, the iPhone has made us soft — the kind of thing that gets nodded along to at certain conferences and immediately forgotten.

But a few points deserve to be called out. First, there is the quite telling series of bullet points effectively saying that famous people shouldn’t be subject to public criticism because it means they might not want to help save you piddling simpletons.

We should show far more grace towards those who have subjected themselves to public life. The eradication of any space for forgiveness—a jettisoning of any tolerance for the complexities and contradictions of the human psyche—may leave us with a cast of characters at the helm we will grow to regret.

[….]

Advertisement

The ruthless exposure of the private lives of public figures drives far too much talent away from government service. The public arena—and the shallow and petty assaults against those who dare to do something other than enrich themselves—has become so unforgiving that the republic is left with a significant roster of ineffectual, empty vessels whose ambition one would forgive if there were any genuine belief structure lurking within.

This is the same Harpers Letter-style nonsense where people who deem themselves to be great thinkers or great men of history find it horrifying that the public might call them on their bullshit. I mean, sure, we should show more grace in general to lots of people, but these fragile-minded billionaires keep acting like because some wacko on social media calls them on their bullshit pronouncements it’s the end of the world.

But it gets way worse from there. Buried near the end are points 21 and 22, which are insane, and should make anyone who continues to work with or for Palantir radioactive:

Some cultures have produced vital advances; others remain dysfunctional and regressive. All cultures are now equal. Criticism and value judgments are forbidden. Yet this new dogma glosses over the fact that certain cultures and indeed subcultures . . . have produced wonders. Others have proven middling, and worse, regressive and harmful.

We must resist the shallow temptation of a vacant and hollow pluralism. We, in America and more broadly the West, have for the past half century resisted defining national cultures in the name of inclusivity. But inclusion into what?

Advertisement

Strip away the corporate-academic language and you’re left with a very old, very problematic argument: certain cultures — and we all know which ones they are claiming are supposedly the “middling” and “regressive” ones — are inferior, and the pursuit of inclusivity has been a civilizational error. That framing — some cultures produce wonders, others are regressive and harmful, pluralism is a civilizational threat — has been used to justify exclusion, hierarchy, and far worse for over a century. And while internet fascists like to think of it as edge lord contrarianism today, to most people it just comes across as a shiny coat of paint on historical bigotries and ignorance.

Eliot Higgins, the founder of Bellingcat, sarcastically pointed out that it was “extremely normal and fine for a company to put this in a public statement.” In a much longer and more thoughtful thread on this, he made a key point:

It’s also worth being clear about who’s doing the arguing. Palantir sells operational software to defence, intelligence, immigration & police agencies. These 22 points aren’t philosophy floating in space, they’re the public ideology of a company whose revenue depends on the politics it’s advocating.

Eliot Higgins (@eliothiggins.bsky.social) 2026-04-19T10:26:27.958Z

This is the publicly endorsed worldview of a company that is rapidly becoming load-bearing infrastructure for the federal government’s surveillance and enforcement apparatus, and it contains arguments that would be at home in a white nationalist pamphlet.

Advertisement

Palantir has always been a bit creepy and cultlike in their worship of government power. Years back I debated one of its founders regarding Google employees convincing the company to drop out of a government AI surveillance effort, Project Maven. He insisted that those employees were naive and Google was weak for backing down. Of course, Google’s decision to leave Project Maven turned out to be a huge win for Palantir, who effectively took it over in Google’s place.

But back then, Palantir at least played the game of pretending to care about cultural diversity and pluralism. As Chris Person pointed out, until fairly recently, Palantir had employee resource groups called Palamigos, PalaNoir, PalanQueer, PalanGender Queer, the Palantir Interfaith Network, PalAPI, and PalNoir. The company celebrated exactly the kind of pluralism and multicultural identity that Karp’s manifesto now denounces as “shallow” and “vacant.”

And yes, they even pretended they had a pro-DEI stance:

At least now we see what happens when they feel they can go full mask off.

Advertisement

With Trump in power, Karp apparently feels free to discard the diversity framing the company used for years to recruit employees and just say the quiet part out loud.

The apparent hope is to use Trump’s support over the next few years to permanently weave themselves into the federal government’s tech stack. The NY Times last year talked about how Palantir’s Foundry is becoming the connective tissue for federal data:

The push has put a key Palantir product called Foundry into at least four federal agencies, including D.H.S. and the Health and Human Services Department. Widely adopting Foundry, which organizes and analyzes data, paves the way for Mr. Trump to easily merge information from different agencies, the government officials said.

Creating detailed portraits of Americans based on government data is not just a pipe dream. The Trump administration has already sought access to hundreds of data points on citizens and others through government databases, including their bank account numbers, the amount of their student debt, their medical claims and any disability status.

Palantir has made itself ideologically and technically indispensable to one specific administration’s political project — which happens to include mass deportation, data consolidation on citizens, and the kinds of enforcement actions that require exactly the ideological framework Karp just publicly endorsed.

Meanwhile, the even more recent $10 billion Army contract consolidates 75 separate contracts into a single decade-long enterprise deal.

Advertisement

Supporters of Palantir will likely argue that it sounds like this “embrace fascism” strategy is working great. The company is signing these rich contracts and getting its technology deep within the infrastructure of the federal government. And, yes, you could say that these are short term wins (even if the stock price is kinda lagging).

But these things cut both ways. When your value to the government is primarily ideological alignment with a specific political project, you become a clear and visible target the moment that project loses power.

One of the many problems with fascism as a business strategy is that it only works if the fascists stay in power indefinitely. It’s a woefully unpopular ideological position, especially in the US — betting on a temporarily ascendant horse that has no chance in a longer race.

But Karp and Palantir have bet the farm that either Trumpism will remain a powerful force within the government or that they will be so deeply buried in the systems that it would be effectively impossible to rip them out when more grounded leadership enters the picture.

Advertisement

That’s an incredibly risky bet, and one I doubt will pay off.

Karp has made sure that he and his company have become ideologically toxic to a non-fascist government. A future non-Trumpist administration will have tremendous reputational incentive to very visibly rip out Palantir, as a signal that the prior regime’s infrastructure is being dismantled.

This is exactly the trap we warned about last year when we wrote about Silicon Valley’s embrace of fascism for short-term gain. Contractual dependency you can unwind. But you’ve told everyone in public what you are, and you can’t walk that back when the winds shift.

And the winds do shift. Companies that tied themselves to nationalist or authoritarian regimes throughout the 20th century tend not to have great long-term track records as independent entities. Some survive — though often in name only, most heavily restructured, with decades of reputational rehabilitation to follow. When you make yourself a load-bearing pillar of a specific regime’s specific project, your fate becomes tied to that regime’s fate.

Advertisement

Then there’s the talent question. The piece we wrote last year noted that authoritarianism drives brain drain — that foreign students, researchers, and the global talent pool that has always fed American innovation are already heading elsewhere. Palantir just published a document telling the world, in effect, that a diverse workforce is “shallow” and “vacant” and that some cultures are “regressive.” The engineers who have options — and the best ones always do — just got a very clear signal about whether they should take Palantir’s recruiter call.

There’s a version of Palantir’s business that doesn’t require publishing a white-nationalism-adjacent manifesto. You can sell analytical software to the federal government without announcing that pluralism is a mistake and that some cultures are regressive. Plenty of defense contractors manage it. The business didn’t force the decision to publish those 22 points. It was a choice to double down on ideological signaling, presumably because Karp and company have calculated that visible loyalty gets rewarded in the current environment.

And perhaps it earned some cheers from the remaining trolls on X, for whatever that’s worth.

But it’s a recipe for disaster over the long haul, which seems odd for a company whose entire sales pitch is based around the ability to use its tech to get great insights into how strategic decisions will play out.

Advertisement

This is exactly the warning we gave tech founders last year. The pitch that democracy is messy and slow, that innovation really needs someone who “gets it” cutting red tape, leads directly and predictably here: first you justify the pragmatism of cutting red tape, then you’re chasing the contracts, then drafting the manifestos, until your stock price depends on friendly presidential posts and your long-term viability depends on a political coalition never losing power.

Palantir has decided this is its business model. The rest of the industry should watch very carefully what happens next. Because the thing about tying yourself to a regime isn’t that it never works. It’s that when it stops working, it stops working all at once — and you’ve burned every other option on the way there.

Filed Under: alex karp, donald trump, fascism, silicon valley

Companies: palantir

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

A Humanoid Robot Set a Half-Marathon Record in China

Published

on

Over the weekend in China, a humanoid robot shattered world half-marathon record—the human record—by seven minutes.

The star performer was a robot developed by the Chinese company Honor (the smartphone maker), which finished the 13.1-mile race in 50 minutes, 26 seconds. The human record, set by Ugandan Olympic medalist Jacob Kiplimo, is 57 minutes, 20 seconds. The result marks an impressive milestone especially considering that, just a year earlier, the fastest robot at this half-marathon event took two and a half hours to complete the same distance.

But Honor’s robot was not the only participant. The event consisted of more than 100 humanoid robots from 76 institutions across China. The robots lined up alongside 12,000 human runners in Beijing’s E-Town, albeit on separate courses to avoid accidents. The contrast in performance between humans and robots was more than evident.

Run, Robot, Run

A humanoid robot is designed to mimic the structure and movement of the human body, with legs, arms, and sensors that allow it to interact with its environment. In this case, the winning robot incorporated features inspired by elite runners: long legs (almost a meter), advanced balance systems, and a liquid cooling mechanism, similar to that of smartphones, to prevent overheating during the race.

Advertisement

In addition, many of the participating robots operated autonomously, meaning without direct human control. Thanks to artificial intelligence algorithms, they could adjust their pace, maintain balance, and adapt to the terrain in real time. Notably, the Honor robot that achieved the 50-minute mark operated autonomously. The Chinese manufacturer presented another robot, operated by remote control, that ran the same stretch in even less time: 48 minutes, 19 seconds.

As expected, there were some accidents in the race. Some robots fell down, others veered off the path, and several needed technical assistance along the way. While the physical performance of humanoid robots has advanced rapidly, their reliability is still developing. Of course, the laughter and jeers are no longer as frequent as they used to be, replaced by applause and exclamations of surprise.

robot china maratón

The winning robot, “Blitz,” from smartphone manufacturer Honor was on display at the awards ceremony after the Beijing E-Town Robot Half Marathon.

Photograph: Lintao Zhang/Getty Images

Robot Superiority

Just like the robots that went viral for their impressive martial arts display a few weeks ago, this long-distance race is part of a broader strategy by China to show off its leadership in the development of advanced robots.

Advertisement

You don’t need to be a robotics expert to see that this achievement demonstrates that machines can outperform humans at specific physical tasks under controlled conditions. (It’s hard to imagine that the winning robot could achieve the same result, for example, if it started to rain during the race.) But humans still have a few tricks up their sleeve: Running in a straight line is very different from performing complex real-world activities, such as manipulating delicate objects or interacting socially.

However, it’s understandable that the image of a robot crossing the finish line in record time, ahead of human athletes, raises several questions. Is this the beginning of a new era in which machines redefine physical limits?

One could argue that a car is a machine, and those have always been faster than humans. But a humanoid robot is designed to mimic humans. It’s more alarming to see one beat humanity at its own game—even if so many of them are still tripping over themselves.

This story originally appeared in WIRED en Español and has been translated from Spanish.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2025