President Donald Trump on Tuesday said he wants to see someone purchase Spirit Airlines, with the low-cost carrier facing headwinds as it looks to exit bankruptcy.

Trump was interviewed on CNBC’s “Squawk Box” and said, “I don’t mind mergers” and suggested that could help resolve the issues Spirit faces.

“You know, Spirit’s in trouble, and I’d love somebody to buy Spirit. It’s 14,000 jobs, and maybe the federal government should help that one out,” the president said.

He also drew a distinction between a merger involving Spirit and the reports of a possible merger between United Airlines and American Airlines, saying those companies are “doing very well. I don’t like having them merge.”

RISING FUEL COSTS THREATEN SPIRIT AIRLINES’ BANKRUPTCY EXIT PLAN: REPORTS

President Donald Trump said he would like to see Spirit Airlines be acquired as the airline faces challenges in exiting bankruptcy. (Scott Olson/Getty Images)

Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy spoke Tuesday at an event on reforms to the nation’s Air Traffic Control system and acknowledged the president’s comments, adding he will look into the matter.

“The president says take a look. And he is my boss. And, so, we will take a look,” Duffy said.

Spirit Airlines filed for its second bankruptcy in August 2025 amid mounting losses and dwindling cash reserves. The low-cost carrier first filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection in November 2024 after unsuccessful merger talks with JetBlue and Frontier.

SPIRIT AIRLINES REACHES DEAL TO EXIT BANKRUPTCY PROCEEDINGS BY EARLY SUMMER

In late February, Spirit announced a deal that would allow it to exit bankruptcy proceedings by early summer after reaching an agreement with lenders. 

The airline told a bankruptcy court the deal would allow it to emerge as a leaner carrier, focusing on routes and time periods with the strongest demand as well as cutting some of its high-cost aircraft leases and improving the utilization of its remaining fleet. 

It also planned to expand premium seating options and enhance its loyalty programs to drive repeat business and preserve its low-fare positioning.

AMERICAN AIRLINES JOINS WAVE OF CARRIERS HIKING CHECKED BAG FEES AS JET FUEL PRICES SKYROCKET

Spirit unsuccessfully pursued mergers with JetBlue and Frontier. (Joe Cavaretta/South Florida Sun Sentinel/Tribune News Service via Getty Images)

That plan has been threatened by a recent surge in fuel prices driven by the Iran war because Spirit’s low-cost structure is more vulnerable to surging fuel costs as it has less flexibility to raise fares due to the risk of declining demand. 

The Wall Street Journal and Bloomberg reported that some of Spirit’s creditors have explored the potential liquidation of Spirit due to the situation. Creditors have also raised concerns about the viability of the restructuring plan if fuel prices remain elevated.

The report noted that JPMorgan analysts estimate that higher fuel prices could add about $360 million to Spirit’s expenses this year, exceeding the $337 million in cash it reported at the end of last year.

GET FOX BUSINESS ON THE GO BY CLICKING HERE

The company said in court filings it expects fuel price volatility to ease in the coming months, with conditions potentially stabilizing later this spring.

FOX Business reached out to the White House and the Department of Transportation.

FOX Business’ Bradford Betz and Reuters contributed to this report.

NEW YORK — Starbucks Corp. shares slipped in midday trading Tuesday, falling 1.62% to $97.35 as investors grew cautious ahead of the coffee giant’s fiscal second-quarter 2026 earnings report scheduled for April 28, with concerns over slowing same-store sales growth and ongoing challenges in China weighing on sentiment.

At 12:24 p.m. EDT, SBUX stock had declined $1.60 from the previous close amid moderate volume. The modest pullback followed a period of relative stability in recent sessions, with shares trading near $98-100 after recovering from earlier 2026 lows. The stock remains down significantly from its all-time highs above $110 in 2021, reflecting persistent pressure on the company’s core business amid shifting consumer habits and heightened competition.

The upcoming earnings report, set for release after market close on April 28 with a conference call at 1:15 p.m. Pacific Time, has become a focal point. Analysts expect revenue around $9.1 billion to $9.3 billion for the quarter ended March 30, 2026, with adjusted earnings per share near $0.59 to $0.65. Consensus forecasts suggest continued softness in comparable store sales, particularly in North America and China, where same-store sales have faced headwinds from cautious consumer spending and competitive pricing.

Starbucks has been working to stabilize its business under CEO Brian Niccol, who took the helm in 2025. The company has introduced new menu items, including Energy Refreshers launched in early April, spring beverages with ube, coconut and lavender flavors, and enhancements to its rewards program aimed at boosting partner (employee) retention and customer loyalty. A new incentive rewards program rolled out in April seeks to share more success with hourly partners through improved pay and benefits, starting in July.

Despite these initiatives, traffic and transaction trends remain mixed. In China — once a key growth engine — same-store sales have struggled with economic slowdown and intense local competition. North American same-store sales have shown modest improvement in some periods but continue to face pressure from inflation-weary consumers trading down or visiting less frequently. The company has responded with value-focused promotions, new afternoon refreshment options and store remodels, including plans to refresh 1,000 locations in 2026.

Starbucks also announced a joint venture with Boyu Capital to accelerate long-term growth in China and is exploring supply chain optimizations, including a new office presence in Nashville, Tennessee, for certain teams. These moves signal a broader effort to improve efficiency and adapt to changing market dynamics. However, union-related labor disputes continue in some U.S. markets, adding another layer of complexity.

The stock’s recent performance reflects a market that remains skeptical about the speed of recovery. While new menu items and rewards enhancements have generated buzz — particularly the April Energy Refreshers and limited-time spring offerings — investors are waiting for concrete evidence of sustained traffic growth and margin expansion in the upcoming report.

Analysts have mixed views heading into earnings. Some maintain Hold ratings, citing valuation concerns and the need for clearer signs of turnaround. Others see potential upside if Starbucks can demonstrate progress on same-store sales, partner retention and China stabilization. The average price target sits modestly above current levels, though forecasts vary widely depending on assumptions about consumer spending and competitive intensity.

Broader market context on Tuesday showed selective strength in consumer discretionary names, but Starbucks traded lower as investors rotated away from names facing near-term uncertainty. The Dow Jones Industrial Average advanced modestly, while other restaurant and retail stocks showed mixed results.

For Starbucks, the path forward involves balancing innovation with cost control. The company has invested in digital ordering, loyalty enhancements and new beverage platforms to drive afternoon and evening traffic. Yet rising labor and commodity costs continue to pressure margins, making operational efficiency critical.

Longer-term tailwinds include the global appeal of the Starbucks brand, expansion opportunities in emerging markets and potential benefits from a more normalized interest rate environment that could support consumer spending. However, near-term risks include further economic slowdown, intensified competition from local coffee chains and execution challenges on store refresh and menu strategies.

Retail investors have shown divided sentiment. Some see the current price as an attractive entry point for a recovery play, citing the company’s strong brand equity and cash-generating ability. Others remain wary, pointing to repeated misses on same-store sales targets in recent quarters and the heavy lifting required to reignite growth.

As midday trading continued, volume remained steady without the extreme spikes seen during major news events. Options activity suggested measured positioning ahead of earnings, with implied volatility indicating expectations for a meaningful post-report move — potentially 6-8% in either direction based on historical patterns.

Starbucks operates more than 40,000 stores globally, with a significant presence in the U.S., China and other international markets. The company has faced scrutiny over store closures in underperforming locations and strategic shifts in its approach to third-place experiences versus convenience-driven purchases.

The upcoming Q2 report will also provide updates on progress with the new rewards program, partner incentives and any color on full-year guidance. Management has previously emphasized a multi-year transformation focused on restoring growth, improving margins and enhancing the customer and partner experience.

Tuesday’s 1.62% decline appears largely anticipatory, with investors locking in gains or reducing exposure ahead of what could be a pivotal earnings update. Whether the stock rebounds or faces further pressure will depend heavily on the tone and specifics shared on April 28.

For a company that once enjoyed near-uninterrupted growth, the current environment demands disciplined execution and clear communication. Starbucks remains a cultural icon with enormous brand loyalty, but translating that into consistent financial results has proven challenging in recent years.

As the clock ticks toward the April 28 earnings release, all eyes are on whether Starbucks can demonstrate tangible progress or if headwinds will persist. In the meantime, the modest midday dip serves as a reminder of the uncertainty surrounding consumer-facing stocks in an uneven economic recovery.

HM Revenue and Customs has confirmed it will appeal against a First-Tier Tribunal ruling that would cut VAT on public electric vehicle charging from 20% to 5%, in a decision that has drawn stinging criticism from charge point operators, campaigners and SME-led infrastructure businesses across the country.

The ruling, handed down last month, followed a case brought by Charge My Street, a not-for-profit charging operator, which argued successfully that electricity supplied through public chargers should fall within the reduced 5% rate applied to domestic electricity use. Judge Harriet Morgan found that applying the standard 20% rate was a “strained construction” of the VAT Act, which treats electricity as being for domestic use provided a single user does not consume more than 1,000 kilowatt hours at one premises in a given month, enough, in practical terms, to recharge a Tesla Model Y sixteen times over.

That finding, uncovered after accountancy firm Deloitte spotted the discrepancy and worked pro bono alongside Charge My Street, offered the clearest hope in years that the long-standing gulf between home and public charging costs might finally close. Three days of tribunal argument turned on the interpretation of a handful of words, notably “a month” and “premises”, before the judge came down firmly against HMRC’s position.

The Treasury, however, has no intention of conceding. In a statement on Tuesday, an HMRC spokesperson said: “We’re appealing this case, as our position is that standard rate VAT applies to electricity supplied through public EV charging infrastructure.”

For drivers, the stakes are considerable. Those fortunate enough to have a driveway pay 5% VAT when charging at home; the estimated 40% of UK households without off-street parking are stung with 20% at public chargers, four times the rate for what is, electrically speaking, identical electricity. In some cases, industry figures note, running an EV on public charging alone can cost up to ten times more per mile than charging at home, eroding the very economic case government policy relies upon to accelerate the switch from petrol and diesel.

According to calculations by charger-mapping company Zapmap, the VAT differential currently nets the Treasury roughly £85m a year. That figure is projected to climb to £315m by 2030 and into the billions thereafter as the national EV fleet scales. Against a fiscal backdrop strained by the Iran conflict, mounting pressure to scrap a planned fuel duty increase, and the government’s own commitment to introduce pay-per-mile taxation on electric cars, ministers are evidently reluctant to surrender a growing revenue stream to replace the £24.5bn currently generated annually by fuel duty.

The appeal has triggered an unusually unified response from an industry more often given to commercial rivalry than common cause.

Will Maden, director at Charge My Street, was blunt: “About 40% of the UK population, they don’t have drives. Transitioning to EVs is a huge problem. Adding 20% makes a huge difference. My personal view is we should be making the transition to EVs as cheap as we can. This is an environmental issue.”

John Lewis, chief executive of charge point operator char.gy, described the appeal as “a deeply disappointing decision, and one that sends entirely the wrong signal to the millions of people who rely on public charging.” Lewis confirmed his firm would pass any eventual VAT cut straight through to customers, adding that “the government talks about accelerating EV adoption, yet is actively choosing to maintain a tax structure that makes public charging more expensive than it needs to be and undermines the transition.”

Tanya Sinclair, chief executive of Electric Vehicles UK, accused ministers of defending inequality by proxy: “Drivers without off-street parking already pay more to charge simply because of where they live. HMRC appealing this ruling is the government choosing to defend that inequality. If you’re serious about EV adoption, you don’t fight the ruling that would fix your most regressive charging cost.”

Ginny Buckley, chief executive of Electrifying.com, questioned the political optics. “For a government that talks about standing up for ‘working people’, the decision to appeal flies in the face of that,” she said. “This hits those without driveways the hardest, making it more expensive for them to switch, and in some cases, that makes EVs more expensive to run than petrol.”

Warren Philips, campaign lead at FairCharge, which has spearheaded the lobbying effort, called the appeal indefensible: “People unable to charge at home pay four times the VAT rate of their neighbours for identical electricity. By appealing, the government is telling 1.4 million current EV drivers, and more than 30 million who will have to switch, that it is willing to go to court to keep public charging costs high.”

The tribunal ruling, for now, binds only Charge My Street. Should HMRC’s appeal fail at the Upper Tribunal, however, the floodgates will open: operators across the sector are understood to be preparing claims for overpaid VAT stretching back years, a liability that could run into hundreds of millions of pounds.

For the UK’s SME charge point operators, many of them small, founder-led businesses already grappling with grid connection delays, planning bottlenecks and capital costs, the appeal represents more than a fiscal irritation. It is, in their view, a test of whether Whitehall is serious about the commercial foundations of the net zero transition, or merely content to talk about them.

Jamie Young

Jamie is Senior Reporter at Business Matters, bringing over a decade of experience in UK SME business reporting.
Jamie holds a degree in Business Administration and regularly participates in industry conferences and workshops.

When not reporting on the latest business developments, Jamie is passionate about mentoring up-and-coming journalists and entrepreneurs to inspire the next generation of business leaders.

The architects who will design the hotel are behind other luxury accommodation in Chelsea, Fitzrovia, Bristol, Battersea, and Chester

Planning permission has been granted for the construction of a new four-star hotel in the heart of Cardiff. The council has granted permission to J. B. S. L. Holdings Ltd for the remodelling and change of use of part of the existing building at 125-139 Queen Street in Cardiff.

The plans relate to part of the large building opposite the Capitol Centre at the end of Queen Street where Newport Road becomes Dumfries Place. Plans also include a new three-storey extension plus a roof-top pavilion containing a fine dining restaurant and sky-bar.

According to the application, the development aims to provide 158 high-quality four-star rooms for visitors to Cardiff while “enhancing the streetscape and contributing positively to the local economy”. Never miss a Cardiff story by signing up to our daily newsletter here

The sky bar and fine dining restaurant are envisioned as “flexible multi-functional spaces that can accommodate various dining and social experiences and be used by hotel guests and visitors alike”.

Its internal design is said to maximise views with “carefully positioned” seating areas that “offer panoramic perspectives of the surrounding cityscape”.

This ensures that “every guest experience is enhanced by the exceptional visual connectivity and spatial quality of the top floor”.

The hotel’s design is said to be inspired by the “historic architecture of Cardiff and the existing buildings’ art deco inspiration ” but with a “modern and contemporary twist”.

The hotel will also offer a range of facilities and services including a lobby, reception area, access to the sky bar and restaurant and fitness centre.

This ensures “guests have access to everything they need for a pleasant and enjoyable stay”.

Paul Treacy Architects has been hired to design the new hotel. Previously it has designed luxury hotels in Chelsea, Fitzrovia, Bristol, Battersea, and Chester.

Sustainability is said to be a “core” aspect of the development incorporating features such as green roofs, solar panels, and “energy-efficient building systems to minimise environmental impact and promote overall energy efficiency”.

“Innovative” approaches to waste management and water usage will also further enhance the project’s sustainability credentials, it’s stated.

Access to the hotel and sky bar will primarily be from Queen Street to ensure “pedestrian traffic flows seamlessly”.

The application reads: “The proposed hotel development represents a significant opportunity to contribute positively to the built environment of Cardiff while meeting the growing demand for hotel accommodation in the area”.

Lok Sabha polls in Gujarat will be held in a single phase on May 7. Counting of votes will be held on June 4. Anti-incumbency, unemployment, inflation, education and healthcare facilities are some of the other important issues in the election, where the ruling BJP in Gujarat will attempt to retain all the 26 Lok Sabha seats it won in 2019.

Gujarat is among the states which will play a crucial role in deciding the outcome of the elections to the Lower House of Parliament. In the 2014 and 2019 Lok Sabha elections, the Bharatiya Janata Party won all the 26 seats in the state.

Here are some issues that will play a decisive role in the elections in Gujarat:

PM Narendra Modi’s charisma: The ruling BJP has a trump card in the form of the prime minister, who hails from Gujarat and was its chief minister from 2001 to 2014 before occupying the top post of the country. His sway over the followers in his home state is still intact.

Anti-incumbency: Observers feel that the opposition will try to take advantage of any anti-incumbency sentiment during the last 10 years of BJP rule at the Centre. They feel that “floating voters” who do not vote on the basis of ideology can be swayed by the opposition if they offer proper alternatives.

Live Events

Inflation: Low and middle-income households are the worst-affected in terms of the effects of inflation. So this will be a decisive factor considering how the price rise has impacted the lives of people in the last 10 years. The opposition has been constantly targeting the Modi government over this issue.

Unemployment: This is another point that the opposition parties have been using to hit out at the Centre. Since this issue directly affects the lives of common people, this will be high on the mind of voters when they exercise their franchise. Lack of basic education and health facilities in remote areas: If school classrooms are constructed in remote rural areas, there is a dearth of teachers. The lack of primary health centres and doctors also adversely affects health services in rural pockets. Farmers’ issues: Issues like lack of adequate compensation for crop loss due to excess rains, non-availability of fertilisers and land acquisition for project development will also play a major role in affecting voter sentiment, the observers said.

Operator

Good day, and thank you for standing by. Welcome to the Vicor First Quarter 2026 Earnings Conference Call. [Operator Instructions] Please be advised that today’s conference is being recorded.

I would now like to hand the conference over to your speaker today, Jim Schmidt, Chief Financial Officer. Please go ahead.

James Schmidt
Corporate VP, CFO, Treasurer, Corporate Secretary & Director

Thank you. Good morning, and welcome to Vicor Corporation’s Earnings Call for the first quarter ended March 31, 2026. I’m Jim Schmidt, Chief Financial Officer, and I’m in Andover with Patrizio Vinciarelli, Chief Executive Officer; and Phil Davies, Corporate Vice President, Global Sales and Marketing.

Earlier this morning, we issued a press release summarizing our financial results for the 3 months ended March 31, 2026. This press release has been posted on the Investor Relations page of our website, www.vicorpower.com. We also filed a Form 8-K today related to the issuance of this press release. I remind listeners this conference call is being recorded and is the copyrighted property of Vicor Corporation. I also remind you various remarks we make during this call may constitute forward-looking statements for the purposes of the safe harbor provisions under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995.

Except for historical information contained in this call, the matters discussed on this call, including