Crypto World
Japan moves to cut crypto tax to 20%: why it matters
The world’s third-largest economy is reclassifying crypto as a financial instrument and charting a path to slash punishing tax rates. The change reaches far beyond Japan, and most of the coverage is getting the details wrong.
Summary
- Japan has taken a major step toward treating crypto like a mainstream financial asset.
- The 20% crypto tax rate is a target for 2028, not a change taking effect now.
- Reclassification under FIEA could open the door to regulated crypto ETFs in Japan.
- The move matters globally because a major economy is shifting from punitive policy toward integration.
On June 11, 2026, the lower house of Japan’s parliament passed a bill that begins one of the most consequential regulatory shifts in the country’s crypto history. The legislation reclassifies cryptocurrency from its current home under the Payment Services Act into the Financial Instruments and Exchange Act, the statute that governs stocks and bonds, and it sits alongside a closely linked tax proposal that would cut the tax on crypto gains from a punishing rate near 55% toward a flat 20%.
For the world’s third-largest economy, long known for some of the harshest crypto tax treatment among major nations, this is a structural turn toward treating digital assets as a legitimate part of the financial system. It also opens a path toward regulated crypto ETFs that Japanese investors have never had.
The change matters well beyond Japan’s borders, which is why it has drawn global attention even as much of the coverage garbles the specifics. A major economy moving from punitive to competitive crypto policy is a signal other governments read, a data point in the global regulatory race, and a potential unlock for one of the largest pools of household savings in the world.
But the details are widely misreported, with headlines compressing a multi-stage, multi-year process into a single accomplished fact. This piece lays out what Japan actually did, what it did not yet do, why the reclassification matters as much as the tax cut, and what the move means for the global crypto landscape.
What Japan actually did, precisely
The single most important thing to get right: this is a process in motion, not a finished law, and the distinction matters for anyone trying to understand the timeline.
On June 11, 2026, Japan’s House of Representatives, the lower house, passed an amendment bill that moves crypto-asset regulation out of the Payment Services Act and into the Financial Instruments and Exchange Act, often abbreviated FIEA, the law governing securities markets. The bill now advances to the upper house, the House of Councillors, for deliberation.
It requires upper house passage, government promulgation, and follow-on rulemaking by the Financial Services Agency before it takes full legal effect, which is expected to happen next year, not immediately. The Cabinet approved the underlying measure back in April, so the June lower-house vote is a major step in a sequence that began earlier and has further to run.
That tax change is a separate but linked matter, and conflating the two is the most common error in the coverage. The headline 20% rate does not live inside the FIEA reclassification bill itself; it sits in a closely associated tax proposal, and the flat 20% rate is targeted for 2028, not arriving with the reclassification.
Today, crypto gains in Japan are taxed as miscellaneous income at progressive rates that climb toward roughly 55% for high earners, among the heaviest crypto tax burdens in the developed world. The policy path would shift that to a flat, separate 20% rate, aligning crypto with how gains on stocks are taxed.
The accurate summary is that Japan’s lower house has approved reclassifying crypto as a financial instrument, with a linked plan to cut the tax rate to 20% by 2028. Several legislative steps remain before either piece is law.
Why the reclassification matters as much as the tax cut
The tax cut gets the headlines, but the reclassification is the deeper change, and understanding why requires looking at what moving crypto into the securities statute actually does.
Placing crypto under the Financial Instruments and Exchange Act subjects it to securities-style market rules: issuer disclosure requirements, a crypto-specific insider-trading regime, anti-market-abuse enforcement, and tougher penalties for misconduct. This is a double-edged change.
On one side, it imposes tighter obligations on the industry, including more disclosure, more compliance, suitability checks on platforms, and possible eligibility screens that could cap certain unaudited issuer offerings for smaller investors. The Japanese crypto industry will carry a heavier regulatory load under FIEA than it did under the lighter-touch Payment Services Act.
On the other side, that heavier regulation is precisely what legitimizes the asset class in the eyes of conservative institutions. Most of all, it creates the legal foundation for regulated investment products.
Most important of all is the path to ETFs. Under the Payment Services Act, crypto sat in a category that did not support the kind of regulated investment vehicles that securities law enables.
By moving crypto into the FIEA, Japan creates the statutory basis on which spot crypto ETFs and other regulated products can be built and offered to Japanese investors, who have never had access to them. That is the ETF access the reclassification enables, and it may matter as much as the tax change itself.
For a nation with one of the largest pools of household savings in the world, much of it sitting in low-yielding cash and bonds, opening a regulated, tax-efficient route into crypto is potentially far more significant than the tax cut alone. The reclassification is the plumbing; the tax cut is the incentive; and together they could channel a meaningful share of Japanese savings toward digital assets in a way the old regime actively discouraged.
That ETF path also matters for specific assets. Japan is already being discussed as a market where XRP products could arrive before 2028, showing how reclassification can move from abstract legal reform into real product pipelines.
The tax cut and what it changes for investors
Moving from a 55% top rate toward a flat 20% is a dramatic shift in the economics of holding crypto in Japan, and it addresses a long-standing complaint that drove activity offshore.
Under the current system, a Japanese investor’s crypto gains are lumped into miscellaneous income and taxed at progressive rates that can reach around 55% for high earners, far above the roughly 20% flat rate applied to gains on stocks. This disparity has been one of the loudest grievances of Japan’s crypto community for years.
It both punished crypto investment relative to equities and pushed serious traders toward offshore venues and structures to escape the burden. A high-earning investor facing a 55% tax on crypto gains but a 20% tax on stock gains had every incentive to either avoid crypto or move their activity outside Japan’s tax net, and many did exactly that.
A flat 20% rate would erase that disparity, taxing crypto gains the same way stock gains are taxed and removing the penalty that has suppressed domestic crypto investment. The effect, should the tax proposal become law on its 2028 target, would be to make holding and trading crypto within Japan dramatically more attractive.
It would lower the absolute tax burden and end the perverse incentive to route activity offshore. Combined with the ETF access the reclassification enables, the tax cut could bring a wave of previously deterred domestic capital and activity back onshore and into regulated products.
The caveat, again, is timing. This is a 2028 target inside a proposal that still must advance, not a change taking effect now, and investors counting on it should track its progress instead of assuming it.
Why this matters globally
Japan’s move is a national policy change with international weight, and the global significance runs along several lines that make it worth attention far outside Japan.
The first is the signal to other governments. Japan is the world’s third-largest economy and a serious, conservative financial jurisdiction, not a small state competing for crypto business through permissiveness.
When a country of that stature moves deliberately from punitive to competitive crypto policy, reclassifying the asset class into its mainstream financial statute and cutting taxes to match equities, it tells other governments that crypto regulation is shifting from suppression toward integration among the major economies. This feeds the global regulatory race, in which jurisdictions increasingly compete to host crypto activity instead of driving it away.
Japan’s entry on the competitive side adds weight to that trend at the highest level. It also sits beside the parallel US regulatory shift, where classification, ETF access, and market-structure rules are reshaping how digital assets enter traditional finance.
The second is the demand unlock. Japan has enormous household savings and a long history of retail investor enthusiasm for new asset classes, and the combination of regulated ETF access and equity-equivalent taxation could mobilize a significant pool of capital that the old regime kept on the sidelines.
A large, wealthy, under-allocated investor base gaining a clean, tax-efficient route into crypto is the kind of structural demand expansion that matters for the asset class globally, not just locally. It also ties into the global institutionalization of crypto, where public-market access and regulated exposure are becoming central to the asset class.
Third is the institutional dimension. The move comes as major Japanese banks, including the country’s largest, prepare stablecoin projects and as regulators build a clearer framework, signaling that Japan’s financial establishment is engaging with digital assets instead of resisting them.
A major economy bringing its banks, its tax code, and its securities law into alignment around crypto is a meaningful validation that resonates well beyond its borders.
The risks and the caveats
A fair account has to weigh what could slow or complicate this, because the optimistic reading depends on several things going right.
The clearest caveat: none of it is final. The reclassification has passed only the lower house and must clear the upper house, promulgation, and FSA rulemaking before taking effect, expected next year.
The tax cut is a separate 2028 target inside a proposal that has its own path to travel. Legislative processes can slow, change, or stall, and the compressed headlines proclaiming that Japan has already cut crypto taxes to 20% are running ahead of the actual state of the law.
Anyone making decisions based on this should track the upper house deliberation and the tax proposal’s progress instead of treating either as accomplished. That is why how regulatory timing shapes markets matters: policy direction and legal reality often move on different clocks.
The heavier regulation is also a real tradeoff, not a pure positive. Moving crypto under securities law brings disclosure burdens, insider-trading rules, suitability checks, and possible investment caps on certain products for smaller investors, which constrain some of the openness that characterized the lighter-touch regime.
The industry gains legitimacy and ETF access but accepts a heavier compliance load, and how the FSA writes the secondary rules will determine whether the balance lands closer to enabling or constraining. There is also the question of whether the demand materializes as hoped.
Japan’s investors may embrace regulated crypto access, or cultural caution and the asset class’s volatility may temper the uptake. The savings-unlock thesis is a reasonable expectation, not a certainty.
The move is significant and directionally positive for crypto, but its full effect depends on execution across multiple stages that have not yet happened.
What it means for the global crypto landscape
For the crypto market broadly, Japan’s shift is a constructive data point in a year defined by regulatory realignment across major jurisdictions.
One pattern stands out: convergence. The United States has been working through its own market-structure legislation and has seen agency-level commodity classifications for major assets.
Japan is reclassifying crypto into its securities framework and charting a tax cut. Other jurisdictions are building stablecoin and ETF frameworks.
The major economies are, in their different ways and on their different timelines, moving crypto from the regulatory margins toward integration into mainstream financial law. Japan’s June vote is a clear instance of that broader direction.
For an asset class whose largest overhang has long been regulatory uncertainty, a steady accumulation of clarity across the major economies is the kind of slow, structural tailwind that matters more over years than any single headline. It also feeds into the broader market this policy feeds into, where regulation, liquidity, and institutional access increasingly decide which crypto narratives matter.
For investors and observers outside Japan, the practical takeaway is to read this as part of a trend, not an isolated event. The key question is whether the demand unlock the policy enables actually arrives, because that is the part that would feed back into global crypto demand.
A Japan that successfully brings a large share of its household savings into regulated crypto products would be a powerful proof of concept for the integration thesis, one other governments and markets would notice. The reclassification and the tax cut set the stage; what plays out on it over the next two years, through the remaining legislative steps and the response of Japanese investors, is the story worth following.
A major economy changes its mind
Japan spent years as a cautionary example of how punitive policy suppresses a domestic crypto market, taxing gains at rates that drove activity offshore and offering no regulated route into the asset class. The June 11 lower-house vote is the clearest sign yet that the country is changing its mind, reclassifying crypto as a financial instrument, charting a path to cut taxes from 55% toward 20%, and opening the door to the regulated ETFs its investors have never had.
This change is real, structurally important, and globally relevant, and it is also a multi-stage process whose biggest pieces, the tax cut targeted for 2028 and the full reclassification expected next year, have not yet taken final effect. Read accurately, Japan has not yet cut its crypto tax to 20%; it has taken a major step toward doing so, alongside a deeper reclassification that may matter even more by opening the ETF door.
For the world’s third-largest economy to move so deliberately from suppression toward integration is a meaningful marker in crypto’s long regulatory normalization, and a signal other governments will read. The details are more complicated than the headlines suggest, but the direction is unmistakable, and the direction is what makes it matter.
Frequently asked questions
Did Japan cut its crypto tax to 20%?
Not yet. On June 11, 2026, Japan’s lower house passed a bill reclassifying crypto as a financial instrument, and a closely linked tax proposal aims to cut the tax on crypto gains from progressive rates near 55% to a flat 20%. But the 20% rate is targeted for 2028 and sits in a separate proposal, and the reclassification still needs upper-house passage and regulatory rulemaking before taking effect, expected next year. Japan has taken a major step toward cutting the tax, not completed it.
What does reclassifying crypto under the FIEA mean?
It moves crypto regulation out of Japan’s Payment Services Act and into the Financial Instruments and Exchange Act, the statute governing stocks and bonds. This subjects crypto to securities-style rules, including issuer disclosure, an insider-trading regime, and tougher enforcement, while also creating the legal foundation for regulated crypto ETFs that Japanese investors have not had access to. The reclassification may be more significant than the tax cut because it enables regulated investment products.
Why is Japan’s crypto tax currently so high?
Under the current system, crypto gains are treated as miscellaneous income and taxed at progressive rates that can reach roughly 55% for high earners, far above the flat 20% rate on stock gains. This disparity has long been a major grievance of Japan’s crypto community, because it penalized crypto investment relative to equities and pushed traders toward offshore venues. The proposed flat 20% rate would align crypto with stock taxation.
When will the changes take effect?
The reclassification, having passed the lower house, needs upper-house passage, government promulgation, and Financial Services Agency rulemaking before taking full effect, expected next year. The flat 20% tax rate is a separate target for 2028. Both pieces still have legislative steps to complete, so the timeline spans the next two years instead of taking effect immediately, and progress should be tracked rather than assumed.
Why does Japan’s crypto policy matter globally?
Japan is the world’s third-largest economy and a serious, conservative financial jurisdiction. When a country of that stature moves from punitive to competitive crypto policy, it signals other governments that crypto regulation is shifting toward integration among major economies, feeding the global regulatory race. Japan also has enormous household savings, so opening regulated, tax-efficient crypto access could unlock a significant pool of capital, a structural demand expansion that matters for crypto worldwide.
Will this bring more money into crypto?
Potentially. The combination of regulated ETF access from the reclassification and equity-equivalent taxation from the tax cut could mobilize a large pool of Japanese household savings that the old regime kept out, and bring offshore activity back onshore. But this depends on the legislation completing its remaining steps and on Japanese investors actually embracing the access, which cultural caution and crypto’s volatility could temper. The demand unlock is a reasonable expectation, not a certainty.
As of June 16, 2026. Legislative and tax processes change over time; verify the current status before relying on this analysis. This article is information, not investment or tax advice.
The decline is a reflection of a broader slump in investor sentiment toward digital asset-linked stocks. After a wave of crypto IPO enthusiasm last year, bitcoin and cryptocurrency prices have tumbled, and attention has increasingly turned toward artificial intelligence (AI) companies and a pipeline of highly anticipated tech listings like SpaceX (SPCX).
Several crypto companies, including Kraken and Consensys, have halted their efforts amid turbulent crypto markets.
BitGo provides custody, trading, staking and settlement services for digital assets. It also issues USD1, the U.S. dollar stablecoin tied to the Trump family-backed World Liberty Financial project.
The firm has also been promoting its Germany’s BaFin-regulated infrastructure platform as an option for companies adapting to the European Union’s digital asset regime, MiCA, ahead of a licensing deadline at the end of the month.
Most tech startups discover the same uncomfortable truth about PR at some point in their journey. The moment they most need press coverage — when they are launching a product, closing a funding round or trying to establish themselves in a new market — is exactly the moment they are least equipped to get it. The team is stretched, the budget is tight and the process of securing meaningful coverage in the right publications feels opaque and slow.
This problem is particularly acute for tech startups building in the artificial intelligence space. The AI sector generates enormous media interest at the industry level but that interest does not automatically translate into coverage for individual companies. Getting a specific startup’s story into the finance and technology publications that investors and customers actually read requires a media distribution infrastructure that most early-stage companies simply do not have.
Kooc Media has spent eight years building that infrastructure. The agency is a specialist PR and media distribution service with deep roots in the technology, crypto and fintech media ecosystem, and it has now introduced a range of AI-focused PR campaigns designed specifically around the needs of tech startups building in the artificial intelligence space. The service delivers guaranteed placements, same-day publication and distribution across the precise media landscape that AI startup audiences inhabit.
What AI-Focused PR Campaigns Actually Mean in Practice
The phrase AI-focused PR campaign gets used loosely by a lot of agencies. For Kooc Media it has a specific meaning that shapes every element of how campaigns are built and executed.
AI-focused means content that is written with an understanding of artificial intelligence as a technology and a market. Press releases for tech startups in AI need to communicate clearly to multiple audiences simultaneously — investors who care about market opportunity and competitive positioning, enterprise buyers who care about practical applications and business outcomes, developers who care about technical capability and integration, and general business audiences who are trying to understand what AI means for their own operations. Getting that balance right requires an editorial approach that is specifically calibrated for AI communications rather than adapted from a general technology PR template.
AI-focused also means distribution that reaches the specific publications where AI startup audiences are most active. Finance and investment media, specialist technology platforms, crypto and Web3 press, business and economic news sites — these are the outlets that the investors, customers and partners of AI tech startups read. Reaching them requires a network built within this ecosystem, not a generic list of websites assembled to produce impressive-sounding placement numbers.
Kooc Media’s AI-focused PR campaigns are built on both of these foundations — content crafted for AI audiences and distribution designed for the media landscape those audiences inhabit.
Owned Publications Deliver Guaranteed Results Every Time
The single most important feature of Kooc Media’s PR service for AI tech startups is the owned publication portfolio that makes guaranteed placements a genuine operational reality rather than a marketing claim.
Blockonomi, CoinCentral, MoneyCheck, Parameter, Beanstalk and Computing are all publications owned and operated by Kooc Media. They are established brands in the finance, cryptocurrency and technology publishing space with real editorial authority, genuine reader communities and meaningful credibility in the sectors that AI tech startup audiences follow. Every client receives confirmed placements across all of these publications as part of their campaign — not as a best-efforts goal but as a guaranteed outcome.
Press release approved by the client. Published across all owned sites the same day. No journalist outreach. No editorial pitch process. No uncertainty. This is how every Kooc Media AI PR campaign operates, and the difference it makes for tech startups trying to coordinate press coverage with specific business activities is significant.
Product launches, funding announcements, partnership reveals and platform updates all benefit from guaranteed same-day publication. News in the AI sector has a narrow window of peak relevance and coverage that appears days or weeks after the moment has passed delivers a fraction of the impact it would have had if it had gone live immediately. Kooc Media’s owned media model solves this problem completely. All owned publications are listed on the Kooc Media sites page.
Scaled Distribution Across Partner Networks and Global Platforms
Every AI tech startup PR campaign begins with confirmed in-house placements and extends outward through Kooc Media’s AI-focused campaign distribution network to reach audiences across the full scope of relevant finance and technology media.
The partner distribution network adds hundreds of additional websites and thousands of syndicated outlets to every campaign, ensuring that press releases from AI tech startups circulate broadly across the relevant media ecosystem rather than being confined to the owned portfolio. This layer of distribution is what turns a solid baseline of guaranteed coverage into a campaign with genuinely wide reach across the publications and platforms that AI startup audiences are following.
Premium distribution packages provide access to a third tier of reach through the most authoritative business and financial media platforms in the world. Through these channels press releases from AI tech startups can appear on Business Insider, Bloomberg, Benzinga, MarketWatch, USA Today, Dow Jones feeds and comparable global platforms that carry enormous credibility with institutional investors, global enterprise clients and international industry press.
For tech startups at the stage where a single well-placed media mention in a globally recognised publication could change the trajectory of an investor conversation or an enterprise sales process, this level of distribution access is genuinely transformative.
Michelle De Gouveia, spokesperson for Kooc Media, said: “Tech startups in AI are building some of the most significant products of this generation. The challenge is not that their stories are not worth telling. It is that they have not had access to a PR service that is genuinely built for them — fast enough to keep up with the pace of the sector, targeted enough to reach the audiences that matter and guaranteed enough to actually deliver on its promises. That is exactly what our AI-focused campaigns provide. We built this service to give AI tech startups the media infrastructure that was previously only available to much larger companies.”
AgentLocker.ai — Ongoing Visibility Beyond the Campaign
Every tech startup that runs an AI-focused PR campaign with Kooc Media receives a permanent free listing in AgentLocker.ai, the dedicated AI tools and agents directory that Kooc Media has developed and operates.
AgentLocker.ai was built to solve the discovery problem that has emerged as the AI tools market has expanded. The number of AI-powered products available across categories including productivity, automation, content creation, coding assistance, data analysis, customer service, marketing and research has grown faster than any general search mechanism can effectively organise. AgentLocker.ai provides a structured alternative — a purpose-built directory where users can find, compare and evaluate AI tools across specific categories with confidence.
The strategic value of an AgentLocker.ai listing for AI tech startups lies in what it delivers over time. Press coverage is enormously valuable at the moment of publication — it creates immediate awareness, drives traffic and generates the kind of third-party credibility that no owned content can replicate. But its impact is concentrated in time. An AgentLocker.ai listing works differently. It places a startup in a directory visited by users who are actively searching for AI tools, generating a consistent stream of targeted visibility that continues indefinitely.
The listing is included at no additional cost, created during the campaign and permanently active. For startups that are building for the long term, the combination of press campaign impact and sustained directory presence creates a media approach with both immediate reach and enduring value.
Fully Managed With No PR Experience Required
Kooc Media’s AI-focused PR campaigns are completely managed by the agency from first brief to final report. Tech startups do not need communications staff, pre-written press releases or any prior experience of running PR campaigns to get started.
The editorial team handles all content creation based on a brief from the client. Finished copy is shared for review and approval before anything is published. Distribution begins the same day approval is received. A comprehensive results report with live links to every placement follows when the campaign is complete.
Those links serve as investor-facing evidence of media coverage, website press mentions that build credibility for new visitors, backlinks that strengthen search engine performance and validation signals that support enterprise sales and funding conversations.
Give Your AI Startup the Media Presence It Deserves
The AI tech startups that will define their categories over the next five years are building right now. The ones that invest in media presence early accumulate credibility and recognition that compounds over time and becomes increasingly difficult for competitors to overcome. Kooc Media’s AI-focused PR campaigns provide the fastest, most reliable and most guaranteed route to that media presence — built specifically for the pace, complexity and audience profile of the artificial intelligence sector.
Kooc Media’s AI packages are available now through the company’s website at https://kooc.co.uk/ai-pr/.
Hackers are sneaking malware into Steam Workshop wallpaper downloads that are capable of stealing crypto wallet information and installing crypto miners.
The wallpaper malware operation, discovered by cybersecurity firm Kaspersky, relies on Wallpaper Engine, one of the many apps available on Valve’s Steam Workshop.
Kaspersky discovered that downloads were being loaded with malware that included “infostealers” such as Lumma and Vidar, and the ReEngine loader.
In the case of the Lumma infostealer, it’s capable of stealing data from crypto wallets and installing further malware that allows it to search for wallet files, browser extensions, and local keys from the likes of MetaMask, Electrum, and Exodus.
Read more: Crypto malware creators allegedly infected their own PCs
The RenEnginer loader, meanwhile, has been utilised in pirated game launchers for the likes of Assassin’s Creed, FIFA, and Need For Speed, and is also capable of crypto wallet data extraction.
Kaspersky also noted that some hidden malware was installing crypto miners. This malware often would run unnoticed; however, a tell-tale sign of an illicit crypto miner is often an unusual decrease in computer performance.
Crypto malware wallpaper download by tens of thousands
The infected wallpaper packages had anywhere between thousands and tens of thousands of downloads.
Kaspersky claims that users from China and Russia were downloading most of them, with users also found in Singapore, Hong Kong, Germany, Vietnam, India and Canada.
The firm believes that the malware, which relied on the legitimacy of Steam Workshop, is likely the work of multiple individual bad actors and not a collective hacking group.
Steam has reportedly removed all the identified malicious wallpaper packages.
Read more: GitHub breach traced to poisoned VS Code extension
In 2023, a popular fan-made version of Super Mario Bros was found to have been laced with malware and infostealers that installed miners and stole personal information.
Last year, it was theorised that the US might be helping actors deploy similar malware against Russian Solana developers in order to disrupt Kremlin-linked ransomware gangs.
In another case from 2025, one group of 16 alleged creators of a malware-as-a-service bot were charged by the US.
The group allegedly leased the bot to bad actors and helped deploy malware to over 300,000 computers across the globe. They’re believed to have caused $50 million worth of damage.
Legal documents noted that the alleged creators also infected their own PCs both deliberately and accidentally.
Got a tip? Send us an email securely via Protos Leaks. For more informed news and investigations, follow us on X, Bluesky, and Google News, or subscribe to our YouTube channel.
May and early June 2026 underscored the split-screen nature of crypto investing, where policy momentum can lift prices, but macro conditions and geopolitical risk can quickly overwhelm those gains. Bitcoin started the period with a move above $80,000, helped by institutional interest and progress on U.S. regulation. Within weeks, that optimism faded as investors repriced interest-rate expectations and risk appetite deteriorated, pulling prices back toward the low-to-mid $60,000s.
Below is a market-focused read of the key forces shaping the period, drawing on commentary from Moneyfarm’s portfolio team and the supporting market context described in that note. The takeaway is not that regulation or institutional adoption has stopped, but that crypto’s trading dynamics remain sensitive to the same macro variables that influence broader risk assets.
Bitcoin’s regulatory lift, then a fast reversal
The early phase of the rally coincided with a notable U.S. legislative milestone. The proposed CLARITY Act, intended to create a clearer framework for cryptocurrencies and outline regulator responsibilities, cleared the Senate Banking Committee on May 14. The approval was followed by a short-lived jump in Bitcoin price action, according to the note, with the asset briefly moving near $81,965.
Yet the move also faced skepticism from on-chain and market-structure observers. CryptoQuant, as cited in the note, suggested that the rise into the upper-$70,000 range appeared driven largely by speculative activity rather than broad, sustained spot demand. In other words, the market may have been responding to headlines faster than it was building durable, day-to-day accumulation.
By the end of May, the pattern became harder to defend. Bitcoin ended May around $73,500, down roughly 3.7% for the month, after backing away from earlier intramonth highs. Ethereum closed near $2,100, remaining below an April peak around $2,460. Bitcoin dominance held at approximately 58%, consistent with a market period commonly referred to as “Bitcoin Season.”
Rates and geopolitics reassert crypto’s “high-beta” role
Macro factors took center stage in the run-up to June. The note describes three overlapping developments: a new Federal Reserve (Fed) chair, the breakdown of a ceasefire, and a shift away from expectations for rate cuts. The incoming chair, Kevin Warsh, was confirmed May 13 by a narrow margin, and sworn in May 22. While the note characterizes him as unusually crypto-literate, the immediate market reaction still hinged on rate math.
Warsh inherited a policy environment where inflation pressures remained, oil was elevated, and bond yields were higher. By early June, traders were pricing in a higher probability of no rate cuts in 2026, and the note says some positioning reflected the possibility of hikes. Bitcoin, the note adds, tracked the repricing closely, slipping from around the low $80,000s in mid-May to the low $60,000s.
Geopolitics then acted as an accelerant. The note points to renewed escalation involving Iran, including strikes launched June 3 associated with attacks in and around Kuwait International Airport and other regional targets. In the narrative, leveraged positions were liquidated within hours, and Bitcoin fell below $65,000, reaching roughly $61,351 by early June. A key interpretive point for market participants is that crypto’s drawdown was described as steeper than equities in that episode, reinforcing the idea that crypto still trades as a high-volatility risk asset during acute shocks rather than behaving as a hedge.
The broader sentiment indicators in the note also moved in the same direction. The Crypto Fear and Greed Index dropped to 23, classified as “Extreme Fear,” and total crypto market capitalization fell from about $2.53 trillion in mid-May to roughly $2.25 trillion by early June.
Policy progress, but implementation is still ahead
Even with the CLARITY Act clearing a key committee vote, the practical timeline remains a constraint. The note describes the bill as assigning the CFTC exclusive jurisdiction over digital commodities and requiring stablecoin issuers to maintain a 1:1 reserve mandate. It also highlights that passage still depends on additional Senate floor votes, with the ethics provision regarding officials’ crypto holdings described as a central unresolved obstacle.
According to the note, the White House is targeting a July 4 signing, but enforceable rules would not be expected before 2027 regardless. That distinction matters for markets because “headline approval” can drive short-term price reactions, while the actual regulatory operating environment tends to take longer to crystallize.
On-chain and derivatives signals stayed mixed
The note describes a mixed picture in activity and supply indicators. Daily active wallets were cited at roughly 531,000, with new wallet creation around 203,000, the lowest levels in about two years. At the same time, exchange reserves were said to have reached multi-year lows earlier in May. Those signals can be consistent with different interpretations, such as more selective retail participation, profit-taking, or shifts in how traders move coins.
On the derivatives side, the note references a June 1 product development: the Chicago Mercantile Exchange launched Bitcoin volatility futures. For institutional markets, volatility contracts can help with hedging and risk management, though they do not necessarily stabilize spot prices on their own. The broader context is that crypto market plumbing continued to evolve while spot demand appeared less consistent than the early rally suggested.
ETF flows flipped, changing the “floor” narrative
Perhaps the clearest shift in the period described in the note concerns spot Bitcoin ETF flows. The market had seen a strong run earlier, with a six-week inflow streak through April, and total spot Bitcoin ETF net assets crossing $100 billion. But that supportive backdrop deteriorated starting around May 20.
The note says ETFs recorded ten consecutive days of net outflows totaling about $3 billion, with more than 40,000 bitcoin leaving the products. It also cites a weekly outflow around late May of approximately $1.47 billion, characterized in the note as the largest of 2026. By early June, year-to-date flows were described as negative at around -$3.1 billion.
For traders, this matters because ETF flows have increasingly functioned as a visible, capital-access channel. When inflows turn to outflows, the market’s ability to absorb selling pressure can weaken, especially during periods when macro uncertainty is already rising.
What investors are watching next
The Moneyfarm commentary concludes that the situation remains fluid, with the regulatory path, Fed transition, and geopolitical risk all contributing to a fast-changing environment. It also notes that investor attention may be rotating toward other high-risk themes, including the broader pull of technology and IPO-related capital, citing SpaceX’s IPO as an example of competition for speculative interest.
For crypto markets, the near-term focus will likely remain on the interaction between macro policy expectations and the direction of ETF flows. Regulation remains a medium-term tailwind, but the period described here shows that for Bitcoin and Ethereum, price momentum can hinge just as much on interest-rate pricing, leverage conditions, and global risk sentiment as on legislative progress.
Investing in crypto involves a high level of risk. The value of investments can go down as well as up, and investors may not get back the amount originally invested. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice.
A viral post claiming a $1,499 desktop could break Nvidia’s AI empire is racing across X.
The market is not waiting to judge it. Money is already leaving Nvidia stock. And that money could be flowing into AMD, at least for now.
A $1,499 Box and a Big Claim?
The post comes from an account called reputable researcher Bull Theory and landed on June 16.
AMD may have just broken Nvidia’s most profitable business, the renting out of AI compute in the cloud. At CES in January, AMD chief Lisa Su held up a mini PC near that price. It runs large AI models on a desk, with no cloud and no rented GPU.
Want more insights like this? Sign up for Editor Harsh Notariya’s Daily Newsletter here.
The thread frames the math as brutal for Nvidia. It cites a consultant who swapped a $2,800 monthly cloud bill for a few dollars of electricity.
Every firm that buys the box, the post argues, stops paying for cloud AI for good. Lawyers, banks, and doctors with private data are the customers it expects to switch first.
Not surprising to see that the Nvidia stock is already seeing the deepest bit of institutional capital erosion, as highlighted by the negative CMF counter. More on that later in this piece.
The Threat to NVDA Is Bigger Than One Box
The slogan oversells one box, but the trend behind it is real. The bigger threat is not on a desk; it is inside the cloud.
Nvidia’s largest customers are now building their own AI chips to lean on it less. Google has committed up to one million of its chips to Anthropic and is in talks to supply Meta.
Amazon runs its own custom silicon across its cloud at scale. Those in-house chips already make up about 28% of AI server shipments, up from roughly a fifth a year ago.
The cheaper hardware is real too. AMD’s Ryzen AI Halo box opened pre-orders this month at $3,999, below Nvidia’s competing DGX Spark at $4,699. Both trends attack the same thing, the demand for Nvidia’s chips, which is where its revenue comes from.
Nvidia still holds about 70% of the AI chip market, so this is erosion, not collapse. But for the first time, its own customers and a cheaper rival are routing around it.
The Money Has Already Picked a Side, and Its Not Nvidia
The thesis is loud, but the quieter signal is the telling one. The money is already moving. Chaikin Money Flow tracks whether cash is entering or leaving a stock. On Nvidia it has turned firmly negative at -0.168, the weakest reading of any major chip name.
AMD sits at the opposite end, with a positive +0.209, seeing one of the strongest accumulations in the AI chip group.
The trend agrees. Against the SOXX semiconductor index, Nvidia scores just 58.5 on relative strength, while AMD scores 123.
The company that defined AI compute is trailing its own sector, while the rival it once dwarfed leads it.
Nvidia Traders Are Leaning the Same Way
Positioning has turned with the story. In the options market, the Nvidia put/call ratio by volume has risen to about 0.63. Just a day earlier, it sat at a call-heavy 0.49. A rising ratio means puts are gaining on calls, a tilt toward downside hedging.The put-call ratio is still call-heavy but several bearish positions showed up post the viral mini PC post on June 16.
Crypto traders lean in the same direction. On Nansen, the smart money holds its largest chip short against Nvidia, ahead of every peer. The options desk and the perpetual market rarely agree.
Right now, both point away from the Nvidia stock as the money has already picked a side. Despite that, NVDA still manages to keep a near 10% year-to-date uptick, trading around $207 at press time.
The post Nvidia Stock’s Biggest Threat Now Costs $1,499 and Fits on a Desk? appeared first on BeInCrypto.
Prediction market platform Kalshi has partnered with StarCompliance to give financial institutions real-time visibility into employee trading activity as it expands efforts to address insider trading concerns and attract institutional participants.
Summary
- Kalshi has partnered with StarCompliance to give financial firms real time monitoring of employee prediction market trades.
- Employees at participating firms will be required to link their Kalshi accounts, allowing compliance teams to flag suspicious activity.
- The agreement follows Kalshi’s recent compliance push, which included employer disclosures, market risk reviews, and more than 100 blocked insider trading attempts in Q1 2026.
According to a Barron’s report, employees at firms using StarCompliance will be able to link their Kalshi accounts to compliance systems that monitor trades and flag potentially suspicious activity.
The arrangement allows employers to oversee prediction market participation in much the same way they already supervise employee trading in stocks and derivatives.
The partnership comes days after Kalshi introduced new compliance controls across its platform, including employer disclosure requirements for traders participating in markets considered more vulnerable to insider trading.
Earlier this month, the company said it had conducted more than 150 investigations, blocked over 100 suspected insider-trading attempts, and referred 20 cases to law enforcement during the first quarter of 2026.
According to the companies, financial institutions face new risks as prediction markets become more popular because employees may attempt to profit from material nonpublic information through event-based contracts.
StarCompliance said its software will help firms monitor activity on Kalshi and enforce internal compliance policies.
Explaining how the system works, Kelvin Dickenson, chief product officer at StarCompliance, said firms can permit employee participation while requiring account disclosure.
Dickenson said the framework allows employers to tell staff, “You can engage in this activity, but in order to engage in this activity you have to disclose your accounts to me.”
For now, the arrangement focuses on monitoring transactions after accounts are connected. Dickenson told Barron’s that additional controls could be introduced later if clients request them, including requirements for employees to obtain approval before placing prediction market trades.
Compliance measures expand as institutional interest grows
Recent moves suggest Kalshi is putting compliance infrastructure at the center of its push into traditional finance.
Speaking to Barron’s, Max Crowley, vice president of business development at Kalshi, said the company is “obsessed with compliance” and described strong monitoring systems as a basic requirement for working with major financial institutions.
Crowley said the StarCompliance integration emerged after discussions with a large New York hedge fund that wanted to hedge risk through a Kalshi institutional account but could not participate because the platform lacked a StarCompliance connection.
Recalling the conversation, Crowley said the fund’s response was, “You don’t have an integration with StarCompliance.”
The latest announcement follows several steps Kalshi has taken to strengthen oversight. Alongside employer disclosures for higher-risk markets, the company recently launched a whistleblower reporting channel and introduced a risk-scoring process for every proposed market before listing.
Pressure on prediction markets has intensified following a series of alleged insider-trading cases across the sector.
Earlier this month, NPR reported that the U.S. Department of Justice and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission were investigating former U.S. Representative George Santos after Kalshi detected suspicious trading tied to a market involving President Donald Trump’s State of the Union address.
The company froze the account and referred the matter to authorities, according to NPR.
Federal prosecutors have also pursued separate cases involving trading activity on prediction market platform Polymarket.
One case involved a U.S. Army Special Forces soldier accused of using classified information to place trades related to former Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro, while another involved a Google software engineer accused of using confidential company information to trade Google-related contracts.
For years, the crypto industry has been driven by narratives.
From ICOs and DeFi Summer to NFTs, GameFi, the Metaverse, AI tokens, and memecoins, markets have repeatedly chased stories that promised future growth. Capital flowed toward attention, speculation, and potential rather than measurable business performance.
But the industry is evolving.
As crypto matures, a new narrative is emerging—one that may prove more durable than any trend cycle before it:
Revenue is the new narrative.
The Shift From Hype to Fundamentals
In traditional finance, companies are often evaluated based on revenue, profitability, cash flow, and long-term sustainability. Crypto, however, spent much of its early history prioritizing network growth, token distribution, and community expansion over actual economic output.
This approach made sense during the industry’s formative years. Protocols needed users, developers, liquidity, and network effects before they could focus on monetization.
Today, many blockchain networks have achieved scale. The question investors are increasingly asking is no longer:
“How many users does this protocol have?”
Instead, they are asking:
“How much value does this protocol generate?”
This subtle shift represents one of the most important transitions in digital asset markets.
Why Revenue Matters
Revenue demonstrates that a product solves a real problem for real users.
When individuals or institutions repeatedly pay fees to use a protocol, it creates tangible economic activity rather than speculative demand alone.
Revenue-generating protocols often possess:
- Sustainable business models
- Strong product-market fit
- Loyal user bases
- Defensible network effects
- Long-term growth potential
While revenue does not guarantee success, it provides a measurable signal that users find value in a platform’s services.
In an industry often criticized for speculation, revenue offers a foundation grounded in actual utility.
The Rise of On-Chain Businesses
One of crypto’s most fascinating developments is the emergence of fully on-chain businesses.
Decentralized exchanges generate trading fees.
Lending protocols earn interest spreads.
Infrastructure networks collect usage fees.
Stablecoin issuers generate treasury income.
Prediction markets monetize information flows.
Tokenized asset platforms create revenue from issuance and management services.
These businesses operate globally, transparently, and continuously, often with financial metrics visible in real time.
Unlike traditional companies that report earnings quarterly, blockchain protocols frequently provide open access to their economic performance.
This transparency allows investors to evaluate projects using objective data rather than relying solely on marketing narratives.
Revenue and Token Valuation
The growing focus on revenue is also changing how market participants evaluate tokens.
Historically, token valuations often depended on future expectations:
- Potential adoption
- Partnership announcements
- Ecosystem growth
- Narrative momentum
Today, investors increasingly examine:
- Protocol revenue
- Fee generation
- Treasury growth
- Token buyback mechanisms
- Value accrual models
- Economic sustainability
Projects that successfully connect protocol revenue to token holder value may attract greater long-term investor confidence.
As markets become more sophisticated, financial performance is becoming a larger component of token analysis.
The Era of Productive Capital
Another reason revenue is gaining importance is the changing nature of capital allocation.
During periods of abundant liquidity, speculative assets can thrive regardless of fundamentals.
As markets mature, however, investors become more selective.
Capital increasingly flows toward protocols that generate measurable economic activity rather than simply promising future growth.
This creates a feedback loop:
Strong products generate revenue.
Revenue attracts investors.
Investment funds expansion.
Expansion generates additional revenue.
Protocols capable of sustaining this cycle may become the dominant digital businesses of the next decade.
Beyond Revenue: Quality Matters
Not all revenue is created equal.
Sophisticated investors look beyond headline figures to evaluate:
- Revenue consistency
- User retention
- Revenue diversification
- Organic demand
- Cost efficiency
- Long-term scalability
A protocol that earns sustainable revenue from loyal users may ultimately outperform one that generates larger but highly volatile fee streams.
The quality of revenue is becoming just as important as the quantity.
What This Means for Crypto’s Future
The rise of revenue-focused investing signals a broader maturation of the digital asset industry.
Crypto is gradually transitioning from an experimental ecosystem driven primarily by narratives into an industry increasingly evaluated through business fundamentals.
Narratives will never disappear. Stories remain powerful drivers of innovation and capital formation.
However, the strongest narratives of the future may be those supported by measurable economic performance.
In the years ahead, attention alone may no longer be enough.
Protocols will need users.
Users will need products.
And products will need revenue.
The next generation of crypto winners may not simply be the projects with the loudest communities or the strongest narratives.
They may be the projects that generate real value, serve real customers, and produce sustainable revenue at scale.
Because in an increasingly mature digital economy, revenue is no longer just a metric.
Revenue is the narrative.
REQUEST AN ARTICLE
Disclosure: This article does not represent investment advice. The content and materials featured on this page are for educational purposes only.
Bitcoin miners face rising costs as AI computing and cloud mining models gain traction across the industry.
Summary
- U.S. Bitcoin miners face pressure from the halving, power costs, and competition as AI cloud mining gains traction.
- Ei Crypto promotes AI-powered cloud mining, letting users access BTC, ETH, XRP, and other assets without hardware.
- Rising mining costs are pushing investors toward AI-managed cloud computing platforms focused on automation and security.
As the global digital asset industry enters a new cycle of development, U.S. Bitcoin mining companies are facing unprecedented operational pressure. Influenced by multiple factors, including the Bitcoin halving, rising electricity costs, accelerated equipment upgrades, and intensifying market competition, the profit margins of traditional mining enterprises continue to be squeezed. Industry analysts point out that under the current environment, how to improve computing power utilization efficiency, reduce operating costs, and achieve stable returns has become a topic of common concern across the entire industry.
At the same time, AI-powered computing power and cloud mining models are rapidly emerging, becoming a new area of interest for an increasing number of investors and digital asset holders.
U.S. mining companies face profit pressure as the industry accelerates its search for transformation
Since Bitcoin completed its latest halving, the block rewards received by miners have been further reduced. At the same computing power level, the revenue of mining companies has been directly affected.
At the same time, electricity prices continue to rise in certain regions of the United States, leading to steadily increasing operating costs for large-scale mining facilities. In addition to electricity expenses, traditional mining companies must also continuously invest in equipment procurement, mining machine maintenance, cooling system construction, and personnel management costs.
Industry experts believe that future competition in the mining industry will increasingly focus on operational efficiency and intelligent management capabilities. Platforms that can reduce costs and improve computing power utilization through technological innovation will possess stronger market competitiveness.
Against this backdrop, AI-powered computing power management systems and cloud mining models are gradually gaining increasing attention from the market.
AI Cloud computing power is transforming traditional mining models
Unlike traditional mining farm models, cloud mining provides users with a more convenient way to participate in digital assets through centralized computing power resource management.
As one of the global intelligent computing power platforms for digital assets, Ei Crypto integrates global computing power resources through its AI-powered scheduling system, enabling 24/7 automated operation. Users do not need to purchase mining machines, bear electricity costs, or possess professional technical experience to participate in digital asset cloud computing power services.
The platform supports a variety of mainstream digital assets, including:
- BTC
- ETH
- XRP
- USDT
- LTC
- BCH
- USDC
Users only need to select a computing power plan that suits their needs, and the system will automatically complete computing power allocation, earnings calculation, and operational management.
Ei crypto platform advantages gain market attention
As the digital asset industry gradually matures, investors are placing higher demands on platform security, stability, and transparency.
Ei Crypto continues to improve its platform infrastructure and adopts a multi-layered security protection system:
- AI-powered risk control system for real-time monitoring of abnormal activities
- Cold wallet storage mechanism to ensure asset security
- SSL data encryption technology to protect user information
- Multi-factor authentication (2FA)
- Third-party security audit mechanism
- Global server deployment
- 24/7 customer service support
Through its intelligent management and secure operational framework, the platform provides global users with a more stable digital asset service experience.
Getting started with Ei Crypto cloud computing power services
Step 1: Register an Account
Visit the official Ei Crypto website to complete the registration.
New users can receive a $15 trial reward after registration and can also claim a $0.60 daily check-in reward by logging in each day.
Step 2: Deposit Digital Assets
The platform supports deposits of a variety of mainstream digital assets, including:
- BTC
- ETH
- USDT
- XRP
- LTC
- USDC
- BCH
After completing the deposit, users can participate in the cloud computing power program.
Step 3: Choose a computing power plan
Ei Crypto offers a variety of computing power plans based on different user needs.
Sample Plans:
Starter Plan
$100 — 2-day term — Total earnings of approximately $108
Stable Plan
$1,200 — 10-day term — Total earnings of approximately $1,362
Advanced Plan
$5,000 — 20-day term — Total earnings of approximately $6,500
Long-Term Plan
$27,000 — 30-day term — Total earnings of approximately $43,200
After making a selection, the platform will automatically activate the computing power service. The system operates around the clock, and users can monitor their earnings in real time and choose to withdraw or continue reinvesting based on their personal needs.
AI cloud computing power becomes a new trend in the digital asset market
As profit margins in the traditional mining industry continue to shrink, the industry is accelerating its development toward intelligence, automation, and lower barriers to entry.
An increasing number of BTC holders have stated that, compared with simply waiting for market prices to rise, participating in digital asset earning programs through AI-powered cloud computing can further improve asset utilization efficiency and generate continuous returns during the holding period.
Industry analysts believe that, as artificial intelligence technology continues to integrate with digital asset infrastructure, AI cloud computing power is expected to become an important component of the global digital asset ecosystem and provide more investors with more flexible and efficient earnings management solutions.
Conclusion
In the face of continued profit pressure on U.S. mining companies and intensifying industry competition, AI-powered cloud computing and cloud mining models are attracting increasing attention from more and more market participants.
Through its AI-powered computing system, global resource integration capabilities, and comprehensive security protection framework, Ei Crypto provides users with a more convenient and efficient digital asset earnings solution. For investors who wish to continue creating value while holding digital assets, AI cloud computing is gradually becoming a new option worthy of attention.
For more information, visit the official website and download the mobile app.
Disclosure: This content is provided by a third party. Neither crypto.news nor the author of this article endorses any product mentioned on this page. Users should conduct their own research before taking any action related to the company.
A coalition of more than 50 gaming associations, tribal governments, and labor unions submitted a letter to the Senate on June 16, demanding that the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act include explicit language banning prediction markets from offering sports and casino-style event contracts. This is a direct shot at platforms like Polymarket and Kalshi that have built substantial real-money event contract businesses under CFTC oversight.
— NewsTongue (@NewsTongueX) June 17, 2026
Gaming groups urge Senate to ban sports prediction markets in crypto bill
The American Gaming Association, Indian Gaming Association, and Association of Gaming Equipment Manufacturers sent a letter to the Senate calling for language in the Clarity Act that would explicitly… pic.twitter.com/TKcgGM4J4E
Signatories include the American Gaming Association (AGA), the Indian Gaming Association (IGA), and UNITE HERE, which represents 300,000 hotel, gaming, and food-service workers across the U.S. and Canada.
The letter argues that prediction market platforms have engineered the largest expansion of gambling in U.S. history over the past 18 months without state authorization, legislative approval, or meaningful consumer protections.
Discover: The Best Token Presales
Coalition’s Core Argument: CFTC Was Never Built to Police Gambling
The coalition’s legal framing is specific and worth unpacking. The groups are not simply arguing that sports betting is a bad policy. According to the coalition, the CFTC structurally lacks the authority and institutional infrastructure to regulate it. “Sports betting falls outside the CFTC’s remit and cannot be offered through prediction market platforms,” the letter states.
The CFTC was established to oversee commodities and derivatives markets, not to police wagering integrity, underage access, or problem-gambling safeguards – none of which it has enforcement history on.
AGA President Bill Miller has previously stated that gaming integrity frameworks are “being undermined by so-called ‘prediction markets’ who are invading state, local, and tribal authorities.”
UNITE HERE’s president, Gwen Mills, framed it as an employment threat: workers’ livelihoods are “now threatened by prediction markets conducting illegal sports betting in violation of Tribal sovereignty and state laws.”
The IGA’s concern runs deeper still, that the Clarity Act, without explicit carve-outs, could functionally back-door legalize nationwide sports betting by routing it through CFTC-registered platforms, bypassing the tribal-state compact system that currently governs where and how wagering is offered.
The American Gaming Association has also claimed states have lost approximately $1 billion in tax revenue to prediction markets since the start of 2025, though prediction market operators dispute that figure.
Senator John Hickenlooper of Colorado put the jurisdictional argument plainly: “The CFTC has literally no experience in regulating sports betting. Even worse, CFTC has failed to use the authority it does have to protect sports bettors from insider trading, market manipulation, predatory advertising, and financial instability.”
Discover: The Best Crypto to Diversify Your Portfolio
Clarity Act Legislative Battlefield: Three Obstacles, Nine Days, One Threshold
The gaming coalition’s letter lands on a bill already under structural strain. The Digital Asset Market Clarity Act cleared the Senate Banking Committee 15–9 on May 18, a meaningful vote count but one that does not resolve the three distinct obstacles still blocking floor passage.
An unresolved ethics fight embedded in the bill’s language, two competing committee texts that must be merged, and a 60-vote cloture threshold that demands bipartisan buy-in well beyond what the committee vote demonstrated.
With just nine working days before the July 4 recess, Senate drafters face a compressed timeline to decide whether to fold the gaming coalition’s anti-sports-betting language directly into the Clarity Act text or leave it to the separate Schiff-Curtis bill. S
Senators Adam Schiff and John Curtis introduced the Prediction Markets Are Gambling Act (S.4160) in March 2026, which would amend the Commodity Exchange Act to explicitly bar CFTC-registered entities from listing contracts tied to any sporting event or athletic competition, or offering casino-style products like poker or blackjack. That bill preserves state and tribal gaming jurisdiction as the governing framework, exactly what the IGA and AGA want codified.
The immediate regulatory trigger for this lobbying push was the CFTC’s early June 2026 rulemaking, which advanced a framework formally permitting certain sports event contracts on prediction markets. Banning markets on injuries, officiating calls, high-school athletics, and pure-chance games, but leaving skill-influenced event contracts potentially open.
Discover: The Best Token Presales
The post Casinos, Tribes, and Unions Urge Senate to Ban Sports Betting From the Clarity Act appeared first on Cryptonews.
CoinMENA, a cryptocurrency exchange operating in the United Arab Emirates, has signed a banking agreement with Standard Chartered to enhance how customers move between crypto and fiat. The deal is designed to strengthen fiat payment infrastructure, with Standard Chartered set to support key functions including on- and off-ramps and transaction management through virtual account arrangements.
In a separate development, Bloomberg reports that the Central Bank of the UAE has approved Revolut’s applications for Stored Value Facilities and Retail Payment Services licenses—another sign that mainstream fintech is preparing for deeper involvement in the UAE’s regulated financial landscape, even as questions remain about whether digital-asset services will be included at launch.
Key takeaways
- CoinMENA says Standard Chartered will support fiat on- and off-ramps, client money accounts, and virtual-account transaction management in the UAE.
- The exchange frames the partnership as a way to improve transparency and liquidity settlement with approved global counterparties.
- CBUAE approval of Revolut’s Stored Value Facilities and Retail Payment Services licenses indicates regulatory progress for broader fintech payments in the UAE.
- Revolut’s reported licenses cover payments and stored value; they do not amount to a clear, explicit green light for digital-asset trading or related services.
CoinMENA links fiat rails to Standard Chartered
CoinMENA announced that it has entered a banking agreement with Standard Chartered, aiming to “strengthen fiat payment infrastructure” for customers in the UAE. According to a press release shared with Cointelegraph, the exchange will use Standard Chartered to facilitate fiat on- and off-ramps as well as client money accounts.
The agreement also covers virtual account-based transaction management, which CoinMENA says is intended to bring more structured handling of transfers. The exchange believes this will help improve transparency and liquidity settlement when transacting with approved global counterparties.
The move comes as the UAE’s digital asset ecosystem continues to mature and attract more institutional participation. For many exchanges, reliable access to regulated banking infrastructure is increasingly treated as a prerequisite for scaling fiat volumes, reducing operational friction, and meeting compliance expectations tied to customer funds handling.
Standard Chartered emphasizes the UAE’s regulatory pull
Standard Chartered UAE, Middle East and Pakistan CEO Rola Abu Manneh said in the announcement that the UAE has positioned itself as a leading regulatory environment for digital assets. She suggested this creates collaboration opportunities for financial institutions and regulated firms.
That emphasis matters because crypto firms increasingly rely on bank partnerships not just for payment convenience, but for settlement reliability and compliance processes that can be difficult to replicate through non-bank alternatives. In this context, CoinMENA’s choice to anchor parts of its fiat flow around a major global bank reflects a broader trend in which exchanges seek “bank-grade” rails as they expand.
CoinMENA co-founders Dina Sam’an and Talal Tabbaa underlined the strategy in a joint statement, arguing that the industry’s future hinges on banking, regulatory, and operational foundations—not solely on technology.
Why bank agreements are becoming a competitive lever
For UAE-based exchanges, fiat rails are often the difference between frictionless onboarding and a payment process that can be slow, inconsistent, or difficult to scale. While the press release does not quantify outcomes such as reduced settlement time or improved throughput, it does outline the operational components involved: fiat on- and off-ramps, client money accounts, and virtual account transaction management.
These elements are particularly relevant for exchanges that want to attract a wider range of users, including those who prefer predictable banking workflows and clear custody or segregation practices for customer funds. The pledge of “improved transparency” also suggests that CoinMENA views clearer transaction handling and settlement processes as critical to trust and compliance.
Investors and users should watch how partnerships like this translate into day-to-day experience—such as deposit and withdrawal reliability, the smoothness of conversion flows, and whether settlement with counterparties becomes more consistent as volumes grow. Over time, exchanges with stronger banking connectivity may be better positioned to handle institutional-level demand that depends on dependable fiat processing.
Revolut’s UAE licenses signal wider payments expansion
Separately, Bloomberg reports that the Central Bank of the UAE has approved Revolut’s applications for Stored Value Facilities and Retail Payment Services licenses. The report frames this as the fintech moving closer to a UAE launch, with Revolut reportedly planning to build out technology, operations, and local capabilities before it makes its services available.
Bloomberg also notes that UAE users are expected to receive multi-currency accounts, physical and virtual cards, and domestic and international transfers through Revolut’s app. The combination of stored value and retail payment services indicates a focus on payments infrastructure and consumer financial utility rather than a direct digital-asset platform at the outset.
At the same time, the scope of authorization remains a key point for readers. The licenses approved in the report relate to stored value and retail payment services, not an explicit waiver for “virtual asset” activity. Revolut has not publicly confirmed—per Bloomberg’s reporting—whether its UAE offering will include digital asset trading, transfers tied to crypto, staking, or access to its Revolut X exchange.
Cointelegraph reached out to Revolut for comment but did not receive a response before publication, leaving details about a possible digital-asset component uncertain.
Bloomberg also reports that Revolut is considering additional expansion across the Middle East and North Africa, including Turkey and Morocco. If so, the UAE could become a test case for how rapidly the firm scales regulated payments in the region ahead of any expanded service offerings.
What to watch next in the UAE’s regulated finance build-out
These two developments—CoinMENA’s banking agreement with Standard Chartered and Revolut’s central bank licensing progress—highlight the UAE’s push toward deeper integration between regulated banking rails and digital finance services. The immediate questions for market participants are whether CoinMENA’s fiat improvements translate into measurable user and liquidity outcomes, and whether Revolut’s UAE rollout stays strictly within payments or eventually broadens into explicitly licensed digital-asset functions.
The Fruit Paul Hollywood Insists You Start Adding To Your Sourdough
Ryanair boss slams EU rule change to flight bookings
Northland reiterates Ambarella stock rating on AI workload shift
-
Business3 days agoNo Jackpot Winner as $257 Million Prize Rolls Over to $269 Million Monday Draw
-
Crypto World6 days agoOppenheimer backs SpaceX as $70 billion retail frenzy builds
-
Fashion5 days agoWeekend Open Thread: Tuckernuck – Corporette.com
-
Crypto World6 days agoMarkets Rally as SpaceX IPO Looms Amid Iran Tensions and Inflation Surge
-
Crypto World3 days agoZimbabwe Requires Crypto Businesses to Register Annually Under New FIU Regulations
-
Tech5 days agoNanoClaw integrates JFrog registries to secure AI agent downloads
-
Crypto World4 days agoBitget enters Argentina’s regulated crypto market through PSAV registration
-
Tech5 days agoThis Week In Security: Microsoft On Microsoft, Register Your Domains, Linux On ARM, And FreeBSD Joins The File Cache Club
-
Tech6 days agoDutton Ranch star claims they ‘didn’t see any disruption’ on set following Chad Feehan’s exit from Yellowstone spinoff fueled by Taylor Sheridan clash rumors
-
NewsBeat6 days agoEl Nino has formed in the Pacific and could set records, forecasters say
-
Politics6 days agoPolitics Home | Healey Resignation Is “Colossal Failure Of Government”, Says Former Labour Defence Secretary
-
Entertainment6 days agoDonnie Wahlberg & More Heat Up Las Vegas at Circa’s Barry’s Downtown Prime
-
Tech6 days agoOpendoor Ends India Operations, Fueling a Bigger Conversation About AI and Outsourcing
-
Politics6 days agoBelfast burns, while Met chief points finger at Iran and Russia
-
Sports6 days agoFirst Time Since 1971: Australia Register Historic Low In ODI Cricket
-
NewsBeat5 days agoFBI searches office of Ohio voter registration group
-
Business6 days agoAT&T: Verizon's 27% Outperformance Sets Up A Solid Entry Point
-
Tech6 days agoAnthropic is spending $150M to embed 1,000 AI fellows inside nonprofits. No degree required.
-
Politics6 days agoModi thanks Trump for wishes as US attacks Indian seafarers
-
Entertainment6 days ago‘The Pitt’s Fan-Favorite Doctor Confirms Noah Wyle Gave His Blessing to Return [Exclusive]
You must be logged in to post a comment Login