Connect with us

Business

A Guide for Growing SMEs

Published

on

A Guide for Growing SMEs

Most SMEs don’t set out to run a reactive maintenance operation. It happens gradually — a delivery van gets serviced when something goes wrong, a growing fleet outpaces the informal system that worked fine with two vehicles, and before long, the business is spending more on emergency repairs than it would have spent maintaining the fleet properly from the start

Nobody decided this was the strategy. It just became the default.

The businesses that avoid this trap aren’t the ones with the biggest maintenance budgets. They’re the ones that understood, early, that vehicle costs go far beyond the purchase price and the odd repair bill — and that the difference between planned and reactive maintenance compounds significantly over a fleet’s lifetime.

Key Takeaways

  • The purchase price of a commercial vehicle typically represents only 20-30% of its total cost of ownership over five to seven years.
  • Preventive maintenance reduces the total cost of ownership by 15-25% compared to reactive, breakdown-driven approaches.
  • Unplanned downtime can cost several hundred pounds per vehicle, per day, once lost productivity and emergency repair premiums are factored in.
  • The in-house versus outsourced maintenance decision has a genuine break-even point tied to fleet size, not just preference.
  • SMEs that track total cost of ownership by vehicle, rather than relying on instinct, consistently make better replacement and procurement decisions.

Why the Purchase Price Is the Smallest Number That Matters

It’s an easy trap for a growing business: budgeting for a new van or truck based on the purchase price, then being caught off guard by how much the vehicle actually costs to run. Industry data consistently shows that acquisition costs represent only a fraction of what a commercial vehicle costs over its working life — the majority accumulates through fuel, maintenance, insurance, and depreciation across years of operation. A complete guide to calculating fleet total cost of ownership breaks down every cost category that belongs in that calculation, and the hidden expenses that traditional budgeting routinely misses.

This matters most for SMEs specifically because there’s less room for error. A large logistics operator can absorb a poorly-timed replacement decision across a fleet of hundreds. A business running five or ten vehicles feels every one of those decisions directly on the bottom line.

The Maintenance Model Decision Most SMEs Get Backwards

One of the most consequential decisions a growing fleet operator makes is whether to build in-house maintenance capability or outsource it to third-party garages — and the right answer genuinely depends on fleet size, not just preference or convenience. Smaller operations often achieve better economics through outsourcing, since the overhead of facilities, equipment, and technician training rarely pays for itself below a certain vehicle count. Larger fleets eventually cross a threshold where in-house investment starts to make financial sense. A comparison of in-house versus outsourced fleet maintenance costs walks through exactly where that threshold tends to fall and the hidden overhead costs that catch growing businesses off guard when they build maintenance capability too early.

Advertisement

The businesses that get this decision wrong in either direction pay for it — either through the inflated cost of outsourcing at a scale where in-house made more sense, or through the overhead of building a maintenance department before the vehicle count justified it.

What Reactive Maintenance Actually Costs

The appeal of reactive maintenance is that it feels cheaper in the short term — nothing gets spent until something breaks. The reality is closer to the opposite. Emergency repairs carry premium labour rates, expedited parts costs, and towing fees that planned service simply doesn’t. Add in the lost productivity from a vehicle unexpectedly out of service, and the true cost of a single breakdown routinely runs several times higher than the same repair performed on a planned schedule.

For an SME running a lean fleet, this gap matters more than it does for a large operator with redundancy built in. A single van down for a week isn’t a rounding error — it’s a direct hit to delivery capacity, customer commitments, and revenue that a spare vehicle or extra driver would normally absorb.

Building a Maintenance Approach That Scales With the Business

  • Track total cost of ownership per vehicle, not just the purchase price, from the moment a vehicle joins the fleet.
  • Revisit the in-house versus outsourced maintenance decision every time the fleet grows by a meaningful increment, rather than assuming the original setup still makes sense.
  • Budget maintenance as a fixed, planned operating cost rather than a reactive expense that competes with other priorities when it comes up.
  • Calculate the real cost of downtime for your specific business — lost deliveries, missed commitments, coverage costs — not just the repair invoice.
  • Review vehicle-level maintenance data quarterly to catch cost trends before they become replacement-timing surprises.

The Bottom Line

Fleet maintenance rarely feels like a strategic priority for a growing SME until a breakdown forces the issue. The businesses that scale their vehicle operations smoothly are the ones that treated maintenance as a planned, tracked cost from early on — understanding that the sticker price was never the real number that mattered, and that the difference between reactive and proactive maintenance compounds directly into the bottom line.

Advertisement

Continue Reading
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Business

EV Company News For The Month Of July 2026

Published

on

EV Company News For The Month Of July 2026

This article was written by

The Trend Investing group includes qualified financial personnel with a Graduate Diploma in Applied Finance and Investment and well over 20 years of professional experience in financial markets. They search the globe for great investments with a focus on trending and emerging themes. The current focus is on electric vehicles, the EV metals supply chain, stationary energy storage and AI.They lead the investing group of the same brand name, Trend Investing. Features of the service include: Access to the Trend Investing portfolio, 7 monthly news updates, a monthly macro trends update, stock watchlist, CEO interviews, and direct access to the community and group leaders in chat.

Analyst’s Disclosure: I/we have a beneficial long position in the shares of TESLA (TSLA), BYD CO [HK:1211], GEELY AUTOMOBILE HOLDINGS LTD. [HK:0175], XIAOMI CORPORATION [HK:1810], ZHEJIANG LEAPMOTOR TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD [HK:9863], CHERY AUTOMOBILE [HK:9973], BAIDU [HK:9888], GOOGL, APTERA MOTORS (SEV), CONTEMPORARY AMPEREX TECHNOLOGY CO [HK:3750] either through stock ownership, options, or other derivatives. I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it (other than from Seeking Alpha). I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.

This article is for ‘information purposes only’ and should not be considered as any type of advice or recommendation. Readers should “Do Your Own Research” (“DYOR”) and all decisions are your own. See also Seeking Alpha Terms of Use of which all site users have agreed to follow. https://about.seekingalpha.com/terms

Advertisement

Seeking Alpha’s Disclosure: Past performance is no guarantee of future results. No recommendation or advice is being given as to whether any investment is suitable for a particular investor. Any views or opinions expressed above may not reflect those of Seeking Alpha as a whole. Seeking Alpha is not a licensed securities dealer, broker or US investment adviser or investment bank. Our analysts are third party authors that include both professional investors and individual investors who may not be licensed or certified by any institute or regulatory body.

Continue Reading

Business

GAIL India shares tumble 5% despite Q1 net profit doubling to Rs 4,665 crore. Buy, sell or hold?

Published

on

GAIL India shares tumble 5% despite Q1 net profit doubling to Rs 4,665 crore. Buy, sell or hold?
The shares of GAIL India tumbled 5% on Monday even after the Maharatna PSU reported a consolidated net profit of Rs 4,665 crore for the first quarter of FY27, nearly doubling from Rs 2,369 crore reported in the same period last year.

Sequentially, the surge in profit was even sharper, rising more than 214% quarter-on-quarter (QoQ) from the Rs 1,485 crore reported in the January-March quarter of FY26. The company’s shares tumbled to Rs 172.71 apiece on Monday morning.

The gas company’s revenue from operations rose nearly 17% year-on-year (YoY) to Rs 41,350 crore in Q1 FY27, from Rs 35,429 crore reported in the corresponding quarter of FY26. EBITDA stood at Rs 7,573 crore, versus Rs 2,703 crore in the previous quarter.

During Q1 of FY27, the company recorded a capex of Rs 6,176 crore, as against the annual planned capex of around Rs 11,500 crore, in line with its long-term growth strategy. “The sequential increase in natural gas transmission and LHC production underscores the strength of GAIL’s core infrastructure and liquid hydrocarbon operations, while lower gas marketing and polymer volumes reflect the impact of external disruptions during the quarter,” it added.

Advertisement

JM Financial on GAIL share price

JM Financial said GAIL’s EBITDA was significantly higher than estimated, led by substantially higher gas trading EBITDA. That said, this was largely a one-off driven by high margin in JCC crude-linked LNG and extra margin earned in 20–25% open-ended US HH volume, the brokerage noted. However, earnings beat was also aided by better EBITDA in the gas transmission segment, LPG, OHC and petchem segment, it further said, adding that LPG pipeline segment’s EBITDA was slightly lower.

During the conference call, JM Financial noted that GAIL India’s management reiterated gas trading PBT guidance of Rs 45 billion for FY27, while guiding for FY27 gas transmission volume at 123 mmscmd assuming the Middle East tensions continue. All in all, the brokerage raised FY27–29 EBITDA estimates by 3–4%, factoring in Q1 FY27 results and management guidance.


“Furthermore, gas trading profitability is likely to remain robust for GAIL over the medium term given high spot LNG prices and oil-linked prices, while US HH gas price outlook shall stay moderate given expectations of strong growth in the US domestic gas output,” it added.
Also read | High dividend yield stocks: Vedanta, Coal India among 15 largecap stocks with high dividend yields. Do you own any?JM Financial reiterated its ‘Buy’ call on the shares of GAIL India, and raised its target price to Rs 210 apiece, implying nearly 16% upside potential from the stock’s previous closing price.

GAIL share price

GAIL India shares have gained more than 1% YTD, but have recorded marginal losses in a week, month and a year.

In the longer term, the stock has delivered 50% returns over three years and 82% returns over five years.

Advertisement

Also read | Why is the market rising today?

(Disclaimer: Recommendations, suggestions, views and opinions given by the experts are their own. These do not represent the views of The Economic Times)

Continue Reading

Business

Cook grilled for side-lining Secret Harbour candidate

Published

on

Cook grilled for side-lining Secret Harbour candidate

Premier Roger Cook has faced a grilling over a decision to block Labor’s candidate for Secret Harbour from speaking to the media on the day of the state government’s biggest by-election announcement.

Continue Reading

Business

KOSPI Falls More Than 5% as Investors Lock In Profits After Friday’s Record-Breaking Rally Across Seoul

Published

on

Earnings News: Micron Technology Inc (NASDAQ: MU)

South Korea’s benchmark KOSPI index fell 5.36% on Monday, dropping 353.68 points to trade at 6,241.77, as investors locked in profits following the index’s historic single-day surge just two trading sessions earlier.

The index opened sharply lower Monday, initially falling 3.6% before extending losses to as much as 4.25%, dropping 280.05 points to 6,315.4 shortly after 9:15 a.m. local time, according to the Korea JoongAng Daily. The pullback continued through the morning session, pushing the decline past 5% by early afternoon.

Monday’s retreat came directly on the heels of Friday’s record-breaking rally, when the KOSPI surged 17.91% in a single session, the largest one-day percentage gain in the index’s history, following blockbuster earnings from Microsoft, Amazon and Meta Platforms that had eased broader concerns about the sustainability of artificial intelligence infrastructure spending. That Friday rally itself followed a brutal three-session stretch in which the KOSPI had plummeted more than 17%, at one point falling roughly 40% from its June peak.

Notably, Monday’s decline came even as Wall Street posted a positive session heading into the new trading week, with robust earnings from Amazon continuing to fuel investor optimism toward the broader artificial intelligence sector. That divergence between a positive US session and a sharply negative Korean one underscored how much of Friday’s historic rally had been driven by profit-taking and short-covering dynamics specific to the Korean market, rather than a durable, fundamentals-driven shift in sentiment toward Korean chip stocks.

Advertisement

The current bout of extreme volatility fits a broader pattern that has defined South Korean equity markets throughout 2026. The Korea Exchange has repeatedly triggered trading halts, including both sell-side sidecars, which temporarily suspend program sell orders, and circuit breakers, which pause all trading entirely, on numerous occasions this year. By late June, the exchange had already logged close to 30 sidecar activations and five circuit breakers for the year, a pace that had already surpassed the KOSPI’s prior annual record of 26 sidecar halts, set during the 2008 global financial crisis.

Much of the extreme volatility has been driven by the outsized weighting of Samsung Electronics and SK Hynix within the index. The two chipmakers together account for roughly half of the KOSPI’s total market capitalization, meaning sharp swings in either stock, in either direction, tend to translate directly into equally dramatic swings for the headline index. Both companies have repeatedly whipsawed between steep declines and sharp rebounds in recent weeks, tracking a broader global reassessment of artificial intelligence-related chip demand and valuations that has played out across markets in the United States and Asia alike.

Frank Benzimra, head of Asia equity strategy at Societe Generale in Hong Kong, pointed to the concentrated nature of the recent selling pressure when South Korean markets first began plunging in late July. “If you look at what is falling in the market, it has been the stocks in which you have the most leverage,” Benzimra said, according to Al Jazeera, highlighting how heavily leveraged positions tied to chip and technology stocks have amplified the scale of the market’s swings in both directions.

The scale of the recent turbulence has been extraordinary even by the standards of a market that had posted extraordinary gains over the prior 18 months. South Korean equities surged roughly 75% during 2025, driven substantially by the global boom in artificial intelligence and semiconductor demand, before extending those gains with another roughly 50% climb earlier in 2026 as global capital continued flowing into the country’s technology sector. That backdrop of extraordinary prior gains has left the index unusually vulnerable to sharp reversals whenever sentiment toward AI-related chip demand shifts, given how significantly valuations across the sector had climbed during the preceding rally.

Advertisement

South Korean regulators have moved to address the underlying volatility directly in recent days. New cash-deposit requirements for investors using leveraged exchange-traded funds took effect July 31, a change specifically designed to reduce the kind of mechanically amplified trading swings that have repeatedly gripped both the KOSPI and the smaller KOSDAQ index throughout the year.

With the KOSPI now retreating sharply from Friday’s historic gain, market analysts continue to caution against reading too much into any single day’s move given the scale of the index’s recent whipsaw trading. Investors are likely to remain focused in the coming sessions on further earnings reports from major global technology companies, along with any additional developments involving Samsung and SK Hynix specifically, as key factors determining whether South Korean equity markets can find a more stable footing following one of the most volatile stretches in the exchange’s history.

Continue Reading

Business

Hilton Worldwide Holdings: Better Business Demand And Room Growth Support Buy (NYSE:HLT)

Published

on

Hilton Worldwide Holdings: Better Business Demand And Room Growth Support Buy (NYSE:HLT)

This article was written by

I am an individual investor that is now fully focus on managing my own capital that I have saved up over the years. My investing background spreads across a wide spectrum as I believe there are merits to each approach, for instance: Fundamental investing [Bottoms-up etc.], Technical investing [historical charts analysis], and to some extend momentum investing [share price reaction post earnings etc.]. Over the years, I have used the positive aspects of each approach to hone my investing process. The reason to write on SeekingAlpha is to use this platform as a tracker for my investing ideas performance, and also to connect with like-minded investors that have the same investing interest.

Analyst’s Disclosure: I/we have no stock, option or similar derivative position in any of the companies mentioned, and no plans to initiate any such positions within the next 72 hours. I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it (other than from Seeking Alpha). I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.

Seeking Alpha’s Disclosure: Past performance is no guarantee of future results. No recommendation or advice is being given as to whether any investment is suitable for a particular investor. Any views or opinions expressed above may not reflect those of Seeking Alpha as a whole. Seeking Alpha is not a licensed securities dealer, broker or US investment adviser or investment bank. Our analysts are third party authors that include both professional investors and individual investors who may not be licensed or certified by any institute or regulatory body.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Business

Microsoft Just Silenced The AI Skeptics, Why I See 20%+ Upside

Published

on

Microsoft: Cloud Is Going To Be A Winner In 2026 (Rating Upgrade)

Microsoft Just Silenced The AI Skeptics, Why I See 20%+ Upside

Continue Reading

Business

Meghan Markle Wanted to Ensure “Family Harmony” as Her Kids Met King Charles, a Royal Expert Suggests

Published

on

Meghan Markle

Meghan Markle’s decision to join Prince Harry and their two children for last month’s private reunion with King Charles III at Highgrove House was aimed at presenting a unified family front to Archie and Lilibet, according to veteran royal commentator Jennie Bond.

The Duchess of Sussex traveled to Britain alongside Harry, Archie and Lilibet for the meeting at Highgrove, the king’s private Gloucestershire estate, marking the first time Charles had seen his two grandchildren in person in more than four years and the first time Meghan had returned to the UK since 2022. Buckingham Palace confirmed the gathering shortly after it occurred but released no further details or photographs.

Bond, a former BBC royal correspondent, told the Mirror that Meghan’s presence at the reunion served an important purpose for how the children experienced the visit. “It’s a good thing that [Meghan] was part of the family reunion at Highgrove a few weeks ago,” Bond said. She argued that excluding Meghan from the gathering would have complicated the experience for Archie and Lilibet. “The children deserve to see some family harmony: it would have been damaging to have to explain that their mother wasn’t invited,” Bond said.

Bond also offered her own read on where Meghan’s broader focus currently lies, suggesting the duchess’s attention remains centered on the family’s life away from royal duties. “I think her eyes are firmly set on their lives in California, their children and her business ventures,” Bond said.

Advertisement

The Highgrove meeting followed a gradual, incremental thaw in relations between Harry and his father that had been building for months beforehand. In September 2025, Harry and Charles held a private tea at Clarence House, their first in-person meeting in 19 months, which Buckingham Palace also confirmed at the time. That earlier meeting came after Harry told the BBC in May 2025 that his father would not speak to him “because of this security stuff,” while expressing hope for reconciliation. “I would love reconciliation with my family,” Harry said in that interview. “There’s no point in continuing to fight anymore. Life is precious.”

Harry and Meghan stepped back from official royal duties in 2020 and relocated to California, a decision that ended Harry’s automatic entitlement to UK police protection and has remained a persistent point of tension between the couple and the royal family. Harry has pursued legal challenges over his security arrangements in the years since, losing his most recent appeal earlier this year. That unresolved dispute shaped much of the planning around the Highgrove visit, with reports beforehand questioning whether it would be safe for Meghan and the children to travel given the lack of state-funded protection.

The relationship between Harry and the rest of the family has remained strained well beyond the security dispute, particularly following the 2023 publication of Harry’s memoir, “Spare,” in which he made pointed and personal claims about tensions with his brother, Prince William, and other family members. Notably absent from the Highgrove reunion were William and Catherine, Princess of Wales, who instead appeared together at a separate public event in Windsor the same day. Royal editor Roya Nikkhah of The Sunday Times has reported that William and Harry have not seen or spoken to each other since Queen Elizabeth II’s funeral in 2022, writing that William is unlikely to welcome his father’s outreach to the Sussexes.

The Highgrove visit was not the only significant milestone in the family’s recent reconciliation efforts. Prior to the meeting, reports had indicated King Charles was open to allowing Harry and Meghan to stay at Highgrove during future UK visits, a gesture some royal watchers interpreted as an effort to offer the couple greater privacy compared with staying at more heavily scrutinized royal residences. Meghan and the children had not previously visited the UK together with Harry since the funeral of Queen Elizabeth II in September 2022.

Advertisement

Bond’s comments reflect one interpretation among several that have circulated among royal commentators regarding the significance of Meghan’s inclusion in the Highgrove gathering, with observers broadly divided over whether the visit signals a meaningful and lasting shift in relations between the Sussexes and the wider royal family or represents a more limited, one-off gesture tied specifically to allowing Charles time with his grandchildren.

As of early August, neither Buckingham Palace nor representatives for the Sussexes have provided additional public comment on the Highgrove meeting beyond confirming that it took place, and no further details have emerged regarding whether additional visits or meetings between the two branches of the family are being planned in the near future.

Continue Reading

Business

Yen’s to-do list gets harder from here

Published

on


Yen’s to-do list gets harder from here

Continue Reading

Business

Why is Nippon Electric Glass stock plunging today?

Published

on


Why is Nippon Electric Glass stock plunging today?

Continue Reading

Business

Hockey warns on ‘evil’ powers

Published

on

Hockey warns on ‘evil’ powers

Joe Hockey has opened the Diggers & Dealers Mining Forum with dire warnings about Iran and Vladimir Putin, while talking up Australia’s critical minerals importance.

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2025