Connect with us
DAPA Banner

Crypto World

Blockstream CEO Denies Jeffrey Epstein Ties Following DOJ Document Release

Published

on

21Shares Introduces JitoSOL ETP to Offer Staking Rewards via Solana

TLDR

  • Adam Back stated that Blockstream has no financial ties to Jeffrey Epstein or his estate.
  • 2014 emails show Blockstream co-founders discussed funding round allocations with Epstein and Joi Ito.
  • Travel emails referenced a planned visit to St. Thomas involving Back and Hill.
  • Jeffrey Epstein exchanged crypto-related emails with Peter Thiel and discussed Bitcoin’s use cases.
  • Jeffrey Epstein proposed a Sharia-compliant digital currency in 2016 and communicated with multiple tech figures.

Blockstream CEO Adam Back responded to newly released Epstein documents by denying any financial connection between his company and Epstein. The U.S. Department of Justice released a new batch of records under the Epstein Files Transparency Act. Back’s statement followed reports linking Blockstream’s 2014 funding round to Jeffrey Epstein and MIT Media Lab’s Joi Ito.

Emails Show Early Contact Between Epstein and Blockstream Founders

In a 2014 email, Blockonomi earlier reported that Blockstream co-founder Austin Hill addressed Jeffrey Epstein and Joi Ito regarding a seed funding round. Hill said the round was oversubscribed and mentioned an increased allocation from $50,000 to $500,000 for Epstein. Adam Back was included in the same email thread, which showed communication between all parties during the funding process.

In another document, Hill informed Epstein’s associate Daphne Wallace about travel arrangements involving St. Thomas, referencing Adam Back in the same thread. Hill said they were “happy to arrange for our own flights” after the St. Thomas stop. The destination raised questions due to its proximity to Epstein’s private island.

Back confirmed that the company met Jeffrey Epstein through Ito during their investor roadshow. He stated, “Blockstream has no direct nor indirect financial connection with Jeffrey Epstein or his estate.” Hill reposted Back’s full statement on the social media platform X, reaffirming the company’s position.

Advertisement

Back added that Epstein was introduced to them as a limited partner in Ito’s fund, which held a minority stake. He said the fund later divested its Blockstream shares due to a possible conflict of interest. However, Back did not address the specific travel emails involving St. Thomas mentioned in the DOJ documents.

DOJ Files Show Crypto Links to Jeffrey Epstein

The newly unsealed documents show Jeffrey Epstein had conversations about crypto with Peter Thiel in July 2014. In an email, Epstein questioned Bitcoin’s purpose, saying, “There is little agreement on what Bitcoin is.” He also mentioned the contradictions between transparency and anonymity in the technology.

Other emails revealed Hill discouraged Ito and Epstein from backing Stellar and Ripple. He claimed those projects were “bad for the ecosystem” and conflicted with Blockstream’s goals. Hill also warned that supporting multiple crypto ventures could damage trust and company stability.

One of Jeffrey Epstein’s emails from 2016 showed he proposed digital currency plans to Saudi Arabian officials. He outlined a physical fiat currency called “the Sharia” and a Bitcoin-based digital currency. The proposal included goals for internal Muslim financial systems and regional currency innovation.

Advertisement

Other tech and finance names appeared in the unsealed records, including Michael Saylor and Kevin Warsh. Warsh was recently nominated as the next Federal Reserve chair. These names surfaced within over six million pages released under the new transparency law.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Crypto World

US Senator Hagerty Confirms April Timeline for Crypto Market Structure

Published

on

Cryptocurrencies, Law, Politics, Congress

US Senate Banking Committee member Bill Hagerty said Monday that he expects a potential path for a digital asset market structure in the coming weeks after months of delays in Congress.

Speaking at the Digital Assets and Emerging Tech Policy Summit at Vanderbilt University, he said his fellow Republican lawmakers planned to move the bill through the banking panel starting next week.

“We will be in a position, I hope, to bring all of this together very soon,” said Hagerty, referring to work on the bill in the Senate. “On the banking committee side, I think we’re very close, and my expectation is that we get it into committee in this next work period that starts on Monday of next week, so that over the next several weeks we should have this into the banking committee.”

The Tennessee senator added:

Advertisement

“There’re several issues still outstanding, I think none of them are insurmountable and we will get to a point I believe in April that we’ll have it out of the banking committee. There’s still a lot more work to do.”

Cryptocurrencies, Law, Politics, Congress
US Senator Bill Hagerty at the April 6 Digital Assets and Emerging Tech Policy Summit. Source: Blockchain Association

Originally titled the CLARITY Act when it passed the House of Representatives in July, the bill is considered by many lawmakers and industry leaders to be one of the most significant pieces of crypto legislation, but it has faced delays in Congress amid government shutdowns, industry pushback on stablecoin yield and ethics concerns.

It is expected to provide a comprehensive framework for cryptocurrencies in the US, including largely changing oversight of the market from the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) to the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC). 

Because both agencies are involved, the legislation would need approval from the committee responsible for commodities — Senate Agriculture — and that for securities, the banking committee. The agriculture committee advanced its version of the crypto bill in a January markup, but concerns over tokenized equities, ethics, and stablecoin yield have delayed consideration in the banking committee, which needs to hold a markup before a potential floor vote in the Senate.

Related: CFTC chair says agency is ready to oversee entire crypto market

“We’re going into the midterms,” said Hagerty. “I think if we get this done in April, we can clearly get this taken care of before the midterms.”

Advertisement

Limited window for market structure as crypto potentially influences US elections again

Hagerty’s comments echoed those of Coinbase chief legal officer Paul Grewal, who said last week that lawmakers were “close to a deal” on stablecoin yield and other issues in the market structure bill.

According to the Coinbase-backed advocacy group Stand With Crypto, the way lawmakers vote on the legislation could impact their chances for the 2026 midterms, setting the stage for crypto interest groups to potentially influence another major US election.

The crypto-backed political action committee (PAC) Fairshake, which reported spending more than $130 million on media buys in the 2024 elections, said in January that it had a $193-million war chest ahead of the November 2026 midterms.

Advertisement

The group is not alone in its support for crypto on the national stage. The Fellowship PAC, which claimed to have raised “over $100 million” from undisclosed backers aligned with the crypto industry, announced the appointment of Tether executive Jesse Spiro as chair on Wednesday.

Magazine: Clarity Act risks repeat of Europe’s mistakes, crypto lawyer warns