Connect with us
DAPA Banner

Crypto World

Can Silver Price Ride the Ceasefire Wave Past $100? A Falling Dollar Opens the Door

Published

on

Silver (XAG/USD) price trades at $77.31 on April 8, forming a cup pattern on the 12-hour chart with a 32% breakout projection that puts triple digits within range.

The setup arrives as the US-Iran ceasefire crashed Brent crude 15%, dragging the US Dollar Index (DXY) down 1.63% from its April 6 high. A weaker dollar traditionally lifts the silver price because the metal becomes cheaper for foreign buyers. Whether this macro tailwind translates into a confirmed breakout depends on how the handle forms and whether the futures market agrees.

Silver Price Builds a Cup as RSI Shapes the Handle

Silver price has been forming a cup pattern on the 12-hour chart since mid-March. The rounded bottom took shape through the late-March correction, and the recent bounce has now completed the supposed cup. All that remains is the handle, and a small pullback from the recent $77.73 peak hints at that formation.

The Relative Strength Index (RSI), a momentum indicator measuring the speed of price changes, raises a handle case. Between March 9 and April 7, the price made a lower high while the RSI made a higher high. This is a hidden bearish divergence, suggesting that the current pullback from the neckline may continue.

Advertisement
Silver Cup Pattern and RSI
Silver Cup Pattern and RSI: TradingView

A deeper handle would not invalidate the cup. Handles are expected to pull back before breaking higher. The question is how deep it goes and whether the broader macro backdrop gives silver enough support to keep the handle shallow.

Futures Contango Shows No Delivery Urgency Yet

The spread between front-month and second-month silver futures (SIL1! minus SIL2!) sits at -0.55, a condition called contango, where silver futures prices trade higher than near-term prices. This means buyers are not scrambling for immediate delivery.

For context, this spread peaked at 7.875 in early February and hit 6.515 in early March, both periods when the silver price was surging and physical demand was tight. The collapse from those highs to negative territory shows that the urgency has evaporated.

SIL1- SIL2 Futures Spread
SIL1 Minus SIL2 Futures Spread: TradingView

Contango does not kill a rally, but it does suggest the current move is being driven by macro positioning rather than physical supply stress. For the cup pattern to produce a sustained breakout, the spread would need to tighten back toward zero or flip positive, signaling that real demand is catching up with the price.

The macro positioning, however, is shifting fast. The reason sits in the dollar and in the options markets.

Falling Dollar and Shrinking Put-Call Ratio Fuel the Bullish Case

The ceasefire triggered an immediate repricing across commodities. Brent crude dropped 15% as the US-Iran de-escalation removed the war premium from oil. When oil falls, it reduces the petrodollar effect, where oil-importing nations need to buy dollars to pay for crude. Less dollar demand means a weaker dollar in the short-term.

Advertisement

The DXY has dropped 1.63% from its April 6 high and now sits at 98.69, directly on the 0.382 technical support level. If this level breaks, the next stops are 98.09 and 97.50. Every leg lower in the dollar historically provides a tailwind for silver price because the metal becomes relatively cheaper for buyers holding other currencies.

DXY Dollar Index Support
DXY Dollar Index Support: TradingView

The options market confirms the shift. The iShares Silver Trust (SLV) put-call ratio, which compares bearish put options to bullish call options, dropped from 0.67 on April 6 to 0.47 on April 7. The open interest ratio also edged lower from 0.60 to 0.59. Both readings sit well below 1.0, meaning call buyers are dominating put buyers. The drop between April 6 and 7 suggests that bearish bets are being unwound as the ceasefire changes the macro picture.

SLV Put-Call Ratio
SLV Put-Call Ratio: Barchart

With the dollar weakening, oil falling, and options positioning turning bullish, the Silver price chart becomes the final decider.

Silver Price Levels That Determine if $100 Is Reachable

Silver trades at $77.31. The cup’s neckline sits between $77.29 and $77.73. A 12-hour close above $77.73 would confirm the cup breakout.

Above the neckline, $79.12 at the 0.618 level is the first real confirmation zone. A close above $79.12 would validate the breakout and shift the target higher. The $85.07 becomes the first major target. If momentum carries through, the 1.618 extension at $94.69 and the full 32% measured move projection at $102.29 (the $100+ zone) come into play.

For the $100 target to become realistic, two conditions need to hold simultaneously. The dollar must continue weakening below 98.69, and the futures contango must tighten as physical demand returns. Without both, the rally risks stalling at the $85 zone.

Advertisement
Silver Price Analysis
Silver Price Analysis:TradingView

Cup patterns that form during macro regime shifts carry a nuance. If the macro trigger fades, such as the ceasefire collapsing or the dollar rebounding, the cup can convert into a failed pattern rather than a confirmed breakout. The RSI divergence already hints at that risk.

On the downside, $75.45 at the 0.382 level is the first handle support. A deeper handle could test $73.18. $69.51 is the critical floor and a break below would weaken the pattern significantly. A drop below $60.88 invalidates it entirely.

At present, $77.73 separates a confirmed cup breakout with a path toward $85.07 and eventually $100 from a handle deepening toward $73.18 and the $69.51 floor.

The post Can Silver Price Ride the Ceasefire Wave Past $100? A Falling Dollar Opens the Door appeared first on BeInCrypto.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Crypto World

XRP Gains Edge Over Bitcoin in Quantum Risk Exposure

Published

on

XRP Gains Edge Over Bitcoin in Quantum Risk Exposure

Concerns around quantum computing and its potential impact on blockchain security have resurfaced, with many networks taking steps to counter future cryptographic threats.

A recent analysis by an XRP Ledger (XRPL) validator suggests that XRP (XRP) may be significantly less exposed to potential quantum computing threats compared to Bitcoin (BTC), largely due to differences in account activity and key exposure.

Quantum Computing and Crypto: Why XRP’s Exposure Is Minimal

Quantum computers pose a theoretical risk to blockchain wallets by potentially deriving private keys from exposed public keys. However, this risk primarily applies to addresses whose public keys have been revealed on-chain, typically when funds are spent. 

According to the validator, roughly 300,000 XRP accounts, holding a combined 2.4 billion XRP, have never conducted a transaction. Because their public keys have never been revealed, these accounts are less exposed to potential quantum attacks under current threat models.

Advertisement

The validator also identified two XRP wallets holding around 21 million XRP that have remained dormant for over 5 years while exposing their public keys. This indicates that vulnerable “whale” accounts on the XRP Ledger account for only around 0.03% of the total supply.

“Dormant, vulnerable XRP whales are almost nonexistent. The rest is active and has their public key exposed, but is also reasonable to expect to rotate keys if needed,” the validator wrote. “The XRP Ledger is account-based and allows for signing key rotation, so you can rotate keys that sign on behalf of an account without switching the account. This is obviously not a perfect solution at all, and actual quantum-resistant algorithms will eventually be adopted.”

Follow us on X to get the latest news as it happens

The structural gap between the XRP Ledger and Bitcoin on this issue is significant. According to a recent paper by Google, roughly 6.7 million BTC are currently held in quantum-vulnerable addresses. This is equivalent to nearly 32% of Bitcoin’s total supply.

Advertisement

This figure also includes an estimated 1 million BTC believed to belong to Satoshi Nakamoto. Litecoin (LTC) founder Charlie Lee recently cautioned that Satoshi’s Bitcoin could become a target for potential attackers if quantum capabilities advance.

“The million Bitcoins that Satoshi has. Nobody knows who Satoshi is….Those coins are not well protected. They’re actually less safe than current coins in terms of quantum attacks. If quantum does happen, those will be the first coins that will be kind of broken into,” Lee mentioned to BeInCrypto.

Despite these differences, the validator emphasized that no known quantum computers can currently break blockchain encryption. Additionally, XRP users can leverage escrow mechanisms, offering an added layer of protection.

For now, the findings suggest that while quantum risks warrant monitoring, XRP’s current exposure remains limited, particularly regarding dormant large holders.

Subscribe to our YouTube channel to watch leaders and journalists provide expert insights

Advertisement

The post XRP Gains Edge Over Bitcoin in Quantum Risk Exposure appeared first on BeInCrypto.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Crypto World

Miners brace for changing economics ahead of 2028 Bitcoin halving

Published

on

Crypto Breaking News

Bitcoin’s fifth halving is slated for April 2028, and the mining sector is entering that cycle with far tighter margins than in 2024. A mix of higher input costs, strained energy markets and increasingly explicit regulatory expectations are reshaping how miners operate, finance, and plan for the next supply cut.

During the previous halving in April 2024, Bitcoin traded around $63,000 as block rewards halved from 6.25 BTC to 3.125 BTC. By the 2028 event, miners will contend with even higher costs for energy, equipment and capital, all while a record hashrate and evolving policy regimes pressure balance sheets and strategic choices. Those dynamics have sparked a broader rethink: operators are moving beyond pure Bitcoin production toward energy infrastructure, grid services and multi-use sites designed to generate revenue streams that endure beyond block rewards.

Key takeaways

  • The 2028 halving will reduce the block reward to 1.5625 BTC, at a time when input costs and energy prices are elevated relative to 2024.
  • Miner balance sheets are tightening as executives pay down debt and deploy capital with greater discipline; notable sales of Bitcoin by major operators underline a shift in risk posture.
  • Industry participants are pursuing longer-term power contracts and diversified site operations, signaling a move toward energy and infrastructure plays rather than pure mining plays.
  • Regulatory clarity—across custody, banking access and crypto asset markets—appears increasingly central to capital allocation and institutional participation.
  • Market dynamics are converging toward operators capable of financing, sustaining power, and monetizing ancillary opportunities such as grid services and heat reuse.

From cycles to infrastructure: a changing mining playbook

Industry executives describe the coming cycle as structurally different from 2024. Juliet Ye, head of communications at Cango, argues the environment for 2028 “looks almost nothing like 2024,” driven by a widening efficiency gap that forces fleet upgrades and longer energy commitments instead of chasing the cheapest tariffs. “There is less room in the middle now,” she said. “Operators with scale and diversification will be fine. Those without will find the next halving very difficult.”

Along similar lines, GoMining CEO Mark Zalan emphasized that capital discipline now matters more than sheer increases in hashrate. In his view, new deployments must clear tougher returns thresholds, reflecting the need to secure reliable energy and durable infrastructure before the next reward cut.

Despite these shifts, some fundamentals remain familiar. Stratum V2 pool DMND’s co-founder and CEO, Alejandro de la Torre, noted that the core dynamics of mining cycles tend to repeat, with peak hotspots reconfiguring and decentralization expanding as mid-sized players form new energy partnerships. The underlying message is that, even as strategies diversify, the market continues to rebalance around how and where power is sourced and monetized.

Advertisement

Balance sheets tightening: pre-halving recalibration

Evidence of a more conservative posture is visible in recent balance-sheet activity. Mara Holdings disclosed the sale of more than 15,000 Bitcoin in March to reduce leverage, while Riot Platforms liquidated over 3,700 BTC in Q1 to deleverage and restructure debt. Cango sold around 2,000 BTC to address its financing needs, and Bitdeer reported its Bitcoin treasury had fallen to zero as of February 20. These moves illustrate a broader recalibration: miners are prioritizing debt reduction, liquidity preservation and readiness to fund longer-duration power or energy projects ahead of the 2028 halving.

That tightening is accompanied by a deeper reexamination of hardware and site economics. Ye pointed to a structural shift toward energy contracts that span multiple regions, arguing that the most successful operators will lock in stable power and build sites capable of multi-use capacity. The early 2028 cycle is shaping up as a test of whether miners can convert heavy capex into durable, non-hash rate income streams.

Beyond blocks: monetizing energy and grid services

The economics of the 2028 cycle appear to reward operators who diversify revenue streams and manage capital with precision. Zalan described a landscape where “capital discipline now matters more than hashrate maximalism,” and where new deployments must deliver returns that justify the upfront costs and ongoing energy spend. The opportunity set expands beyond mining to include services that align with energy markets, such as load-curtailment, grid stabilization and potential heat reuse at multipurpose facilities.

Cango is positioning itself for this broader model. Juliet Ye highlighted an overarching thesis: facilities that can operate as mining hubs while serving AI inference or other high-performance compute tasks will be the ones that endure. “The facilities that will matter in five years are the ones that can do more than one thing,” Ye said, underscoring a trend toward bifurcated usage—hashpower during certain windows and compute workloads during others.

Advertisement

Analysts and operators also point to a broader industry realignment of incentives. In the 2024 cycle, investors rewarded miners largely on their Bitcoin exposure and price performance. As the sector matures, more capital is likely to flow toward operators that can secure long-term power agreements, participate in grid mechanisms and build scalable, multi-use sites that lock in revenue streams beyond the block reward.

Regulation as a material driver of capital decisions

Regulatory regimes are shifting from a cautious overlay to a more formal framework, and that evolution is increasingly embedded in investment theses. In the United States, developments around custody rules and banking access are being watched closely, while Europe’s Markets in Crypto Assets (MiCA) framework continues to shape how institutions approach crypto assets. Asia’s regulatory moves—along with new settlement rails and ETFs in various markets—are contributing to a clearer, more usable environment for capital to flow into mining and associated energy infrastructure.

Proponents argue that better-defined rules can accelerate capital deployment by reducing policy risk. Zalan indicated that the current backdrop is making capital moves faster when the regulatory environment is clear and reliable. He also suggested that the market has not fully priced in the potential for a tighter supply impulse to coincide with a broader Bitcoin ecosystem expansion by 2028.

What readers should watch next

As the 2028 halving draws nearer, investors, builders and miners will be watching several key signals. The ability of operators to lock in durable power arrangements and to monetize non-mining revenue streams will be critical in determining who emerges strongest from the next cycle. Regulatory clarity, particularly around custody and banking access, will likely influence which companies can scale and attract institutional capital. Finally, the balance between debt management and capex for energy infrastructure will shape which players can sustain operations through a period of reduced block rewards.

Advertisement

In the near term, market participants will assess how quickly energy markets adapt to geopolitical shifts and whether new efficiency gains offset rising input costs. The 2028 halving may test a broader, more resilient mining ecosystem—one that’s less about chasing the next subsidy and more about building enduring, multi-use infrastructure that aligns with evolving energy and financial regulation.

Readers should monitor updates on how miners rearrange their portfolios, the pace of energy-contract takeups, and any regulatory clarifications that influence institutional participation. The next few quarters could reveal whether the sector successfully bridges block rewards with real-world assets and services, marking a new era for Bitcoin mining as a tangible, infrastructure-backed industry.

Risk & affiliate notice: Crypto assets are volatile and capital is at risk. This article may contain affiliate links. Read full disclosure

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Crypto World

Altcoin Season 2026: Wedge Breakout and MACD Signal Fuel Rally Hopes

Published

on

Brian Armstrong's Bold Prediction: AI Agents Will Soon Dominate Global Financial

TLDR:

  • Altcoins have broken above a multi-year falling wedge on the TOTAL2 chart, signaling a potential trend reversal.
  • The MACD indicator is nearing a bullish crossover that closely mirrors the setup seen before the 2020 altcoin rally.
  • Tokens including Zcash, LayerZero, Ethena, and Arbitrum posted gains above 10% within a single 24-hour window.
  • Over 40% of altcoins were near all-time lows in March, yet open interest has since climbed past $113 billion.

Altcoin season 2026 is showing technical signals not seen since 2020. A multi-year falling wedge breakout on the TOTAL2 chart, combined with a looming MACD bullish crossover, has analysts watching closely. 

With several tokens already posting double-digit gains and open interest climbing past $113 billion, the broader altcoin market appears to be building momentum for a potential trend reversal.

Wedge Breakout and MACD Signal Raise Altcoin Hopes

A falling wedge structure has been forming on the TOTAL2 chart since the 2021 market peak. This chart tracks the combined market cap of all altcoins, excluding Bitcoin. 

The pattern reflects a prolonged downtrend with steadily weakening selling pressure over several years.

Analyst Mark Chadwick flagged the development in an April 8 post on X, stating that altcoins were “starting to look insane.” He noted that altcoins had broken above the upper boundary of this wedge. 

Advertisement

That kind of breakout is generally viewed as a reversal signal among market analysts. Beyond the wedge, Chadwick also pointed to the MACD indicator as a secondary signal worth watching. 

The MACD line is moving closer to the signal line, and a crossover to the upside may follow in the coming weeks. “If MACD flips green and confirms the crossover in the coming weeks… Follow the arrow for directions. Higher,” he wrote.

That 2020 MACD crossover marked the start of a broad altcoin rally where many tokens outpaced Bitcoin by wide margins. Crypto Patel separately noted on April 8 that altcoins are bouncing off a long-term trendline stretching back to 2022 lows, adding that “the bottom is in.”

Short-Term Gains Emerge Against a Mixed Market Backdrop

Several altcoins recorded gains above 10% within a 24-hour window earlier this week. Tokens including Zcash, LayerZero, Ethena, and Arbitrum were among those moving higher. 

Advertisement

The total crypto market cap rose more than 4%, reaching around $2.5 trillion, while Bitcoin climbed back above $72,000. Open interest across crypto markets rose over 7% to $113 billion, according to CoinGlass. 

That increase came alongside rising liquidations, pointing to growing speculative activity in the market. However, conditions remain uneven across the broader altcoin space.

Data from late March showed more than 40% of tokens trading near all-time lows, a deeper drawdown than in the prior bear market. Analyst Ash Crypto noted that ALT/BTC charts are showing multiple green MACD bars for the first time in years. 

They stopped short of calling a full altcoin cycle underway, stating that Bitcoin dominance and broader liquidity conditions still need to shift before that call can be confirmed.

Advertisement

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Crypto World

Europe banks pick stablecoin partners as MiCA srives shift

Published

on

Europe banks pick stablecoin partners as MiCA srives shift

European banks and corporates are moving from research to rollout in the stablecoin market. 

Summary

  • European banks and corporates are now choosing stablecoin partners instead of only studying the market opportunity.
  • MiCA gave firms one rulebook, helping stablecoin projects move faster from planning to execution stages.
  • Corporate treasury demand is pushing stablecoin use for payments, settlement, and cross-border fund movement today.

New comments from industry executives show that firms are now choosing partners and preparing live use cases under MiCA rules.

Lamine Brahimi, co-founder and managing partner at Taurus, said stablecoin talks in Europe have changed over the past 18 months. Earlier discussions focused on education, risk, and compliance, but firms are now moving with board approval and launch plans.

Advertisement

He told Cointelegraph MiCA helped speed up that shift by replacing separate national rules with one framework across the region. Brahimi said some of Europe’s toughest financial institutions now see digital assets and stablecoins as part of the current banking stack, not something outside it.

Corporate treasury demand shapes use cases

Corporate treasury teams are driving much of the new stablecoin demand in Europe. Companies want faster fund movement, lower payment costs, and access to settlement outside normal banking hours.

Brahimi said the shift now comes from direct client needs rather than long-range planning. He said that when clients ask for better settlement and smoother cross-border transfers, the discussion becomes more immediate and practical.

Advertisement

Several European institutions have already moved ahead with stablecoin plans. ClearBank Europe said it became the first Dutch credit institution approved under MiCA to operate as a crypto asset service provider.

Other groups are also building new products. A consortium that includes ING, UniCredit, CaixaBank, and BBVA is working on Qivalis, a euro stablecoin project for regulated onchain payments and settlement, while other banks are preparing Swiss-franc and euro stablecoin offerings for 2026.

Data shows stronger business interest

Konstantin Vasilenko, co-founder and chief business development officer at Paybis, said the platform recorded sharp growth in EU stablecoin use. Between October 2025 and March 2026, USDC volume in the EU rose about 109%, while its share of stablecoin activity increased from about 13% to 32%.

He also said buy volume stayed about five to six times above sell volume during that period. Average stablecoin transactions were also larger than typical Bitcoin or Ether trades, which he said points to working capital, settlement use, and more deliberate business flows.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Crypto World

Bitcoin Miners Face a Tougher Road to the 2028 Halving

Published

on

Bitcoin Miners Face a Tougher Road to the 2028 Halving

Bitcoin’s fifth halving is roughly two years away, and the mining sector is heading into it with far less margin for error than in 2024, as higher costs, tighter energy markets and clearer regulation reshape the industry.

At the last halving in April 2024, Bitcoin (BTC) traded at around $63,000 as rewards fell from 6.25 BTC to 3.125 BTC per block, according to Coingecko. In April 2028, at the next halving, miners face higher input costs for half the new coins, as rewards drop to 1.5625 BTC. That looks tougher in a world of record hashrate, higher energy prices and more selective capital.

Energy security has also become a strategic concern after geopolitical shocks jolted fuel and power markets, while regulators from Washington to Europe move from ad-hoc guidance to formal regimes for custody and licensed institutional platforms.

Those pressures are forcing miners to behave less like pure Bitcoin proxies and more like energy and infrastructure companies, monetizing reserves, cutting costs and rethinking capital allocation ahead of the April 2028 Halving.

Advertisement

The shift is also changing how investors assess the sector, with capital increasingly flowing toward operators that can secure long-term power and build infrastructure that extends beyond mining alone.

Balance sheets show tougher pre-halving cycle

Miners are already adjusting. MARA Holdings sold more than 15,000 Bitcoin in March to reduce leverage, Riot Platforms sold over 3,700 BTC in the first quarter, Cango sold 2,000 BTC to pay down Bitcoin-backed debt, and Bitdeer said its Bitcoin holdings had fallen to zero as of Feb. 20.

Bitcoin Hashrate 2026. Source: CoinWarz

Behind those sales is a broader reset in how miners think about hardware, power and capital. The 2028 halving arrives in “an environment that looks almost nothing like 2024,” Juliet Ye, head of communications at Cango, told Cointelegraph.

She pointed to a widening efficiency gap that is “forcing real decisions around fleet upgrades” and a shift toward long-term energy contracts across multiple regions rather than chasing cheaper tariffs.

“There is less room in the middle now,” she said. “Operators with scale and diversification will be fine. Those without will find the next halving very difficult.”

Advertisement

GoMining struck a similar note. CEO Mark Zalan told Cointelegraph that “capital discipline now matters more than hashrate maximalism” and that new deployments now have to clear tougher return thresholds.

Related: Mining companies move deeper into AI, HPC as MARA may sell Bitcoin

From a mining pool’s perspective, some of the underlying dynamics remain familiar even as the pressure grows. “There is actually very little fundamental difference between this mining cycle and previous ones,” Alejandro de la Torre, co-founder and CEO of Stratum V2 pool DMND, told Cointelegraph. “The same dynamics repeat.”

He expects mining hotspots to reach their peak, then realign, as “no region keeps dominance for long,” opening the door for more decentralization as mid-size miners expand into new energy partnerships.

Advertisement

Related: Genius Group liquidates Bitcoin treasury to pay $8.5M of debt

Business models shift beyond pure block rewards

The economics around the next halving are also shifting away from pure block rewards, which is a “thinner business than it used to be,” Zalan said. He predicted stronger operators will look closer to power and data center businesses, and earn additional revenue through curtailment, grid services and heat reuse.

Cango is already building toward that model. “The facilities that will matter in five years are the ones that can do more than one thing,” Ye said, using mining to fill capacity while positioning sites to toggle between AI workloads and hashpower.

Bitcoin Halving Countdown. Source: CoinGecko

Regulation, once viewed mainly as an overhang, is increasingly part of the investment case. Zalan pointed to more specific rules on custody and banking access in the United States, alongside the European Union’s Markets in Crypto Assets (MiCA) regime and new exchange-traded funds (ETFs), derivatives and settlement rails out of Hong Kong, arguing “capital moves faster when those rules are clear and usable.”

Zalan said that backdrop is shaping both how miners finance themselves and how institutions position for the next issuance cut. He said he does not believe the market has “fully priced the next halving,” arguing that scarcity will meet a “much stronger ecosystem around Bitcoin by the time 2028 arrives.”

Advertisement

Ye sees investors already re-rating miners that lock in high-performance compute contracts, with those operators trading at “more than double the revenue multiple of pure-play miners,” while de la Torre believes supporting large established operators is “no longer the only logical path.”

If the 2024 cycle rewarded miners that rode Bitcoin’s price strength, the run into 2028 may favor operators that can manage debt, lock in power and build infrastructure that earns beyond block subsidies.

Magazine: AI agents will kill the web as we know it: Animoca’s Yat Siu