Crypto World
TON price prediction 2026-2030: the Telegram takeover
Toncoin (TON) traded between $2.39 and $2.89 in late May 2026, doubling in roughly ten days after sitting at $1.30 on April 28. The catalyst was a single sentence from Pavel Durov on May 4. Telegram, the 950-million-user messaging app he founded, would replace the TON Foundation as the largest validator and primary force behind The Open Network. This isn’t a governance reshuffle. It’s a 950-million-monthly-active-user messaging platform formally fusing its entire ecosystem to one blockchain.
Summary
- Telegram’s takeover of TON as the network’s largest validator helped drive a rally from $1.30 to $2.89, supported by technical upgrades and new ecosystem developments.
- The bullish outlook depends on successful Telegram integration, stronger user adoption through TON Pay and Stars, and continued execution of the MTONGA roadmap.
- Regulatory setbacks, weak user adoption, or delays in Telegram’s rollout plans could keep TON under pressure and limit long-term growth.
The Catchain 2.0 upgrade (completed April 2026) brought block finality to 0.6 seconds, among the fastest of any major Layer 1. Transaction fees dropped 6x to $0.0005 per transaction. TON Pay 2.0 launches Q2 2026 for instant in-app payments. TON Teleport launches mid-2026, bringing Bitcoin liquidity into the ecosystem. TON Tech launched Agentic Wallets April 28 for AI agents operating on the network.
The MTONGA roadmap (“Make TON Great Again”) represents Durov’s 7-step plan for full Telegram-TON integration. Belarus approved TON for licensed banking and custody services on May 14, 2026. The network processed 1.5 billion transactions in Q1 2026 alone. TVL reached $1.2 billion. TON’s daily transaction volumes briefly surpassed Solana’s average during peak periods.
Telegram Ad Platform creates a demand loop: advertisers buy ad placements using TON, channel owners receive 50% crypto revenue share in TON. Telegram Stars expansion planned for Q3 2026.
The honest read: TON is the rare Layer-1 with distribution already solved. The risk sits entirely on execution, on Telegram delivering MTONGA on schedule, on users actually converting from messaging to payments, and on Durov’s French legal situation resolving without disrupting operations.
This piece walks through the mechanics, the bull case ($8 to $18 by 2030), the base case ($3 to $6), and the bear case ($0.80 to $2), with the specific variables that determine which one materializes.
Why TON is at $2.50 right now
The current Toncoin price reflects the resolution of one of the most concrete catalyst events in crypto for 2026: the formal Telegram takeover of the TON network announced May 4-5.
The starting point: TON traded around $1.30 on April 28, 2026, having declined 83% from its June 2024 all-time high of $8.24. The decline reflected uncertainty about Telegram-TON relationship clarity, broader altcoin weakness, and ecosystem development questions. TON had built substantial usage metrics (1.5B transactions Q1 2026, $1.2B TVL) without translation to proportional token appreciation.
The May 4-5 catalyst: Pavel Durov announced on May 4 that Telegram will replace the TON Foundation as the driving force behind TON and become its largest validator. The exact wording: “Telegram to replace the TON Foundation as the driving force behind TON and to become its largest validator.” Short, deliberate, and structurally big.
The structural significance: this is not governance reshuffling. It’s Telegram formally fusing its 950 million monthly active users to a single blockchain. The validator role means Telegram has direct economic stake in TON network performance. The “driving force” designation indicates Telegram will lead technical development, ecosystem building, and strategic direction rather than a community-run foundation managing these functions.
The immediate market response: TON ran from $1.354 open to $1.598 intraday high on $309 million volume (324% volume explosion). Subsequent days saw continued appreciation as the market priced in the structural change. By May 7, TON reached $2.89, representing 110+% appreciation from the April 28 close.
The Catchain 2.0 upgrade: completed in April 2026, the consensus upgrade brought block finality to 0.6 seconds, making TON among the fastest major Layer 1 blockchains. The technical capability matches or exceeds Solana (~400ms) and Aptos/Sui (sub-second). The performance enables consumer applications that require near-instant settlement.
The fee reduction: transaction fees dropped 6x to $0.0005 per transaction. The change enables economic viability for microtransactions and high-frequency consumer applications that previous fee structures couldn’t support. TON Pay 2.0 (Q2 2026 launch) targets sub-$0.0005 cost per transaction for Telegram-integrated payments.
The agentic wallets launch: April 28, 2026, TON Tech launched Agentic Wallets as an open standard for AI agents operating on the TON blockchain. The launch positions TON for the AI-crypto convergence narrative competing with NEAR’s positioning. AI agents can execute autonomous transactions through native TON infrastructure.
The MTONGA roadmap: Durov’s 7-step plan for fully integrating Telegram’s ecosystem with the TON blockchain. Sequential elements include Catchain 2.0 (completed), validator transition (in progress), TON Pay 2.0 Q2 2026, TON Teleport mid-2026 (Bitcoin liquidity integration), expanded Telegram Stars Q3 2026, and additional development phases through 2026-2027.
The regulatory developments: Belarus approved TON for licensed banking and custody services on May 14, 2026. This represents jurisdiction-specific regulatory acceptance that may signal a pathway for additional regulatory clarity. CLARITY Act framework could provide US regulatory clarity for TON as a commodity classification.
The transaction volume context: TON processed 1.5 billion transactions in Q1 2026, briefly surpassing Solana’s daily average during peak periods. The volume reflects existing Telegram-TON integration through mini-apps, Telegram Stars, and the ad platform without yet incorporating full MTONGA roadmap deployment.
The ad platform revenue loop: Telegram Ad Platform creates a demand loop where advertisers buy ad placements using TON, and channel owners receive a 50% crypto revenue share paid in TON. Every ad purchased creates buying pressure on TON. Every payout circulates TON through the ecosystem. The demand loop is different in kind from speculative demand cycles.
What the price action signals structurally: the May 2026 catalyst event represents one of the most concrete structural transformations in crypto. The market is repricing TON for the new reality where Telegram is formally driving network development with 950M MAU distribution. The current $2.50 level reflects partial repricing plus uncertainty about the execution timeline for the MTONGA roadmap. Significant additional appreciation depends on successful execution of the announced changes.
The bull case: $8-$18 by 2030
The bull case for TON requires the MTONGA roadmap to successfully execute across all phases plus significant user conversion to TON transaction activity.
The user conversion success: Telegram successfully converts a meaningful fraction of its 950 million monthly active users into TON transaction activity. Conservative bull case assumes 10-20% of users (95-190M users) become regular TON transactors. Average user transactions translate to substantial network volume and fee revenue. The conversion happens through TON Pay 2.0 (instant in-app payments), Telegram Stars expansion, mini-app integration, and creator economy applications.
The MTONGA roadmap execution: all 7 steps deploy successfully across the 2026-2027 timeline. TON Pay 2.0 launches Q2 2026 with seamless Telegram integration. TON Teleport mid-2026 brings Bitcoin liquidity, creating multi-chain utility. Expanded Telegram Stars Q3 2026 drives transaction volume. Additional development phases deliver promised functionality on schedule. The execution proves Telegram can deliver complex technical roadmap.
The payment volume scaling: TON Pay processing scales to billions of transactions monthly. The transaction volume drives validator economics, fee revenue, and structural TON demand through Universal payment dynamics. Telegram becomes the largest consumer-facing crypto payments network globally, leveraging WhatsApp/Messenger competitive gap in crypto integration.
The ad platform expansion: Telegram Ad Platform revenue scales significantly through expanded targeting capabilities, additional ad formats, and creator economy integration. The advertiser TON purchases and creator TON payouts create a sustained demand loop at increasing scale. Annual ad platform volume scales from current levels to billions of dollars equivalent.
The validator economics: Telegram’s validator role shows that institutional infrastructure can sustainably operate TON validators. Validator rewards (20+% APR mentioned in some sources) create attractive returns that drive additional staking participation. Staking ratio expands creating supply lock-up dynamics.
The competitive positioning: TON captures a meaningful share of the consumer crypto market from Solana, Ethereum L2s, and other competitors. The Telegram distribution advantage proves decisive for consumer adoption. While other chains compete for DeFi and institutional positioning, TON dominates consumer crypto through its messaging app integration.
The AI agents integration: Agentic Wallets standard enables AI agents to operate natively on TON. As AI agents become commercially significant, TON captures meaningful share through technical capability plus Telegram distribution. The positioning competes with NEAR for AI-crypto convergence.
The regulatory clarity: CLARITY Act framework provides US regulatory clarity. Belarus banking approval extends to additional jurisdictions. Durov’s legal situation resolves favorably without disrupting Telegram or TON operations. The regulatory pathway opens for institutional adoption beyond current crypto-native investor base.
The TON ETF potential: spot TON ETF eventually filed and approved following the patterns set by Bitcoin, Ethereum, Solana, and other crypto ETFs. Institutional accessibility expands beyond crypto-native investors to broader institutional and retail capital.
If multiple bull case conditions materialize, the price targets are:
- 2026 year-end: $5-9
- 2027 year-end: $7-13
- 2028 year-end: $8-16
- 2029 year-end: $8-17
- 2030 year-end: $8-18
The bull case requires sustained execution across user conversion, technical deployment, ecosystem expansion, and regulatory navigation. The most probable bull case outcome per multiple analyst frameworks targets $6-15 range over 2-4 years if Telegram-TON integration delivers expected user adoption and transaction volume.
The base case: $3-$6 by 2030
The base case assumes meaningful but not big MTONGA roadmap execution plus moderate user conversion.
The user conversion scenario: Telegram converts 3-8% of 950M MAU (28-76M users) to regular TON transaction activity. The conversion is meaningful but doesn’t reach the scale required for the bull case. User adoption develops gradually as TON Pay 2.0 launches and Stars expands.
The MTONGA execution: most roadmap steps deploy with some delays or modified scope. TON Pay 2.0 launches but with an extended rollout timeline. TON Teleport ships but Bitcoin liquidity integration takes longer to scale. Telegram Stars expansion happens but reaches a smaller portion of the user base than the bull case envisions.
The payment volume: TON Pay processes meaningful but modest transaction volume relative to the bull case. Hundreds of millions of monthly transactions rather than billions. Fee revenue grows from current levels without reaching transformative scale.
The ad platform: Telegram Ad Platform revenue continues at a moderate pace. Some advertisers adopt TON payments, some channel owners receive TON revenue share. The demand loop functions without explosive growth.
The validator economics: Telegram maintains validator role successfully. Additional institutional validators join. Staking ratio expands moderately. Validator economics stays sustainable.
The competitive dynamics: TON holds its position as a significant consumer-focused Layer 1, but faces continued competition from Solana, Ethereum L2s, and others. Market share is stable or slightly expanding rather than dominating consumer crypto.
The AI agents adoption: Agentic Wallets achieve some traction, but AI-crypto convergence happens across multiple platforms. TON captures specific use cases without dominating the AI agents market.
The regulatory environment: regulatory clarity develops gradually. Some jurisdictions approve TON for specific uses. Durov’s legal situation resolves without major disruption. ETF approval comes in 2027-2028 with modest initial flows.
Base case targets:
- 2026 year-end: $2.50-4
- 2027 year-end: $3-4.50
- 2028 year-end: $3-5
- 2029 year-end: $3-5.50
- 2030 year-end: $3-6
The base case represents meaningful appreciation from current $2.50 levels plus continued volatility around catalyst developments. The support comes from Telegram integration and ecosystem development without producing big price action.
The bear case: $0.80-$2 by 2030
The bear case requires either Telegram-specific setbacks or execution failures disrupting the MTONGA thesis.
The Durov regulatory action: Durov’s legal situation in France or other jurisdictions escalates significantly. Telegram faces restrictions on operations in major markets. The platform’s ability to drive TON integration is compromised by external regulatory pressure on Telegram’s broader business.
The user conversion failure: Telegram users don’t convert to TON transaction activity at meaningful scale. The 950M MAU number proves to be a vanity metric rather than predictive of crypto adoption. Telegram users use the messaging app without engaging with crypto features. TON Pay 2.0 launches but achieves low adoption.
The MTONGA execution failures: roadmap steps face significant delays, scope reductions, or quality issues. Telegram’s technical team encounters challenges delivering complex blockchain infrastructure. Multiple roadmap items get delayed beyond their announced timelines.
The competitive displacement: Solana captures consumer crypto market share through superior performance, deeper liquidity, and broader application ecosystem. WhatsApp or Messenger eventually launch competing crypto integrations leveraging their larger user bases. Telegram-TON loses competitive advantage.
The Telegram strategic shift: Telegram leadership changes priorities, reducing TON integration commitment. Alternative crypto strategies (Telegram Open Network 2.0, multi-chain approach, exit from crypto) emerge. The validator transition is reversed or significantly modified.
The validator economics failure: validator participation declines as institutional validators exit. Staking yields decline. The 20+% APR proves unsustainable. Network security concerns emerge.
The AI agents disappointment: agentic wallets fail to attract meaningful AI agent adoption. NEAR or other AI-focused chains capture the AI-crypto convergence market. TON’s positioning becomes incremental rather than differentiated.
The regulatory deterioration: CLARITY Act stalls or fails. International regulatory pressure increases on consumer crypto applications. Telegram faces restrictions on cryptocurrency features specifically. ETF approval is delayed indefinitely or rejected.
The technical failures: Catchain 2.0 or subsequent upgrades encounter post-deployment issues. Network outages affect user experience. Security incidents damage trust. The technical foundation supporting consumer adoption develops vulnerabilities.
The macro deterioration: broader crypto market weakness disproportionately impacts altcoins including TON. Consumer crypto applications face headwinds during risk-off periods.
Bear case targets:
- 2026 year-end: $0.90-1.80
- 2027 year-end: $0.80-1.80
- 2028 year-end: $0.80-1.90
- 2029 year-end: $0.80-1.95
- 2030 year-end: $0.80-2
The bear case represents significant downside from current levels but assumes TON retains some ecosystem positioning. Complete failure scenarios (price below $0.50) would require Telegram completely abandoning TON integration plus severe market dynamics.
The five variables that determine outcome
Five specific variables determine which scenario materializes.
Variable 1: TON Pay 2.0 launch and adoption (Q2 2026). The most important single near-term variable. Successful launch with meaningful user adoption validates Telegram-TON integration thesis. Delayed or limited launch signals execution challenges. Monitor: TON Pay 2.0 launch announcements, user activation metrics, transaction volumes through Pay 2.0, merchant adoption patterns, and Telegram integration completeness.
Variable 2: MTONGA roadmap execution across staying steps. Catchain 2.0 completed. Validator transition in progress. TON Pay 2.0 Q2 2026. TON Teleport mid-2026. Telegram Stars expansion Q3 2026.
Variable 2: MTONGA roadmap execution across staying steps. Catchain 2.0 completed. Validator transition in progress. TON Pay 2.0 Q2 2026. TON Teleport mid-2026. Telegram Stars expansion Q3 2026. Monitor: Pavel Durov public statements on roadmap progress, technical deliverable announcements, specific milestone completion dates, and quality assessments of deployed features.
Variable 3: User conversion to TON transaction activity. 950M Telegram MAU represents potential. Actual conversion to regular TON transactors is what drives sustainable value. Monitor: TON network active wallet counts, mini-app usage growth, Stars transaction volumes, ad platform participation rates, and overall on-chain activity metrics.
Variable 4: Validator transition status and economics. Telegram replacing TON Foundation as the largest validator is in progress. Sustainable validator economics with attractive yields drives staking participation. Monitor: validator participation rates, staking APR sustainability, TON staked supply growth, additional institutional validator announcements, and validator transition completion timeline.
Variable 5: Regulatory environment specifically affecting Telegram and TON. Durov’s legal situation, CLARITY Act passage affecting TON classification, additional jurisdiction approvals (following the Belarus pattern), and international regulatory dynamics. Monitor: Durov-related legal developments, regulatory announcements affecting Telegram, country-specific TON approvals or restrictions, and ETF filing developments.
The variables interact significantly. TON Pay 2.0 success drives user conversion. MTONGA roadmap execution validates Telegram commitment. Validator economics affect network security. Regulatory clarity enables broader institutional adoption. User conversion creates demand that affects everything else.
What this means for TON holders and traders
For current TON holders, the practical implication is that the asset has undergone a fundamental structural shift through the May 2026 Telegram takeover announcement. The five variables framework provides a way to evaluate whether the MTONGA roadmap is delivering expected outcomes. The current price reflects partial repricing for the new structural reality, with significant additional appreciation depending on execution.
For potential TON buyers, the practical implication is that entry at current $2.50 levels represents the post-catalyst price after the initial structural shift announcement. The risk-reward depends on assessment of MTONGA execution probability and user conversion potential. The Telegram distribution advantage is unique among Layer-1 tokens, but execution risk is concentrated in Telegram’s ability to deliver complex blockchain infrastructure.
For traders specifically, the practical implication is that TON has shown significant catalyst sensitivity (110+% appreciation in 10 days following announcement). Trading around MTONGA roadmap milestones requires monitoring Pavel Durov announcements, technical deliverable dates, and user adoption metrics. The catalyst-driven volatility creates both opportunities and risks.
For institutional investors evaluating TON allocation, the practical implication is TON offers exposure to consumer crypto adoption through unique Telegram distribution. The investment case depends on the belief that messaging app integration can produce sustainable crypto adoption at scale. Belarus banking approval and the CLARITY Act framework provide a regulatory pathway. ETF accessibility may develop following set crypto ETF patterns.
For Telegram users curious about TON adoption, the practical implication is the platform is actively building toward seamless crypto integration. TON Pay 2.0 (Q2 2026) and Telegram Stars expansion (Q3 2026) will provide direct user touchpoints for TON activity. The user experience improvements may make crypto more accessible than current alternatives.
The honest bottom line
On May 4, Pavel Durov announced that Telegram, not the TON Foundation, would run TON. Two days later, TON doubled. The market wasn’t pricing a governance reshuffle. It was pricing a messaging app with 950 million monthly active users formally tying its product roadmap to a single blockchain. TON Pay 2.0 is the next test. If it ships in Q2 and a meaningful slice of Telegram users actually use it for payments, the May rally is the beginning. If it slips or lands without traction, $2.50 is the top, not the floor.
The May 2026 Telegram takeover is fundamentally big. Pavel Durov’s announcement that Telegram replaces TON Foundation as the largest validator and primary driving force represents 950 million monthly active users formally fusing to one blockchain. This is unprecedented in crypto: no other Layer 1 has comparable distribution advantage through an existing major platform.
The technical capabilities are competitive. Catchain 2.0 produces 0.6-second finality matching or exceeding Solana, Aptos, Sui. Transaction fees at $0.0005 enable microtransactions. TON Pay 2.0 will integrate directly into Telegram for instant in-app payments. The technical foundation supports the consumer adoption thesis.
The main risks are real and material: Durov’s legal situation in France could escalate, affecting Telegram operations. User conversion to TON activity may prove difficult despite distribution access. MTONGA roadmap execution requires Telegram to deliver complex blockchain infrastructure on schedule. Competitive pressure from Solana and emerging consumer chains. Telegram strategic shifts could alter TON commitment.
The 2030 price range across scenarios is wide: $0.80-$18 depending on how the structural variables resolve. The base case ($3-$6) represents meaningful appreciation from current $2.50 levels, assuming MTONGA executes successfully with moderate user conversion. The bull case ($8-$18) requires big user conversion plus successful technical execution. The bear case ($0.80-$2) assumes execution failures or regulatory setbacks.
TON’s distribution problem is solved. What hasn’t been proven is whether Telegram can ship blockchain infrastructure on schedule. The distribution advantage is real and unique. The execution challenge is substantial. The next 6-12 months will determine whether Telegram can deliver the MTONGA roadmap on the announced timeline.
The TON Pay 2.0 launch is the most important near-term catalyst variable. Q2 2026 deployment with meaningful user adoption would validate the integration thesis. Delayed or limited launch would signal execution challenges.
User conversion is the most important sustainability variable. 950M MAU represents potential. Actual conversion to regular TON transactors determines whether the distribution advantage translates to sustainable token demand.
The Durov regulatory situation is the most important downside variable. Adverse developments could disrupt Telegram operations, affecting TON integration. Favorable resolution would remove an overhang affecting institutional positioning.
For 2026 specifically, expect TON to trade in the $2-$5 range with significant catalysts around TON Pay 2.0 launch, MTONGA roadmap milestones, user adoption metrics, and Durov-related developments. The support at $2-$2.50 reflects current Telegram integration positioning. The upside ($4-$7) depends on a successful TON Pay 2.0 launch and meaningful user adoption.
For 2027-2030, the structural variables compound. Sustained execution across roadmap delivery, user conversion, validator economics, and regulatory clarity produces a bull case trajectory. Deterioration produces a bear case. The base case assumes mixed outcomes producing meaningful appreciation.
The TON story is ultimately about whether messaging app distribution can produce sustainable crypto adoption at consumer scale. The early evidence is promising: 1.5B Q1 2026 transactions, $1.2B TVL, growing ad platform revenue, Telegram formal commitment through validator transition. The execution challenges are substantial but identifiable. The next phase will determine whether TON achieves the consumer crypto positioning that 950M MAU distribution makes possible.
Frequently Asked Questions
What happened with Pavel Durov’s TON announcement?
On May 4, 2026, Telegram CEO Pavel Durov announced Telegram would replace the TON Foundation as the driving force behind The Open Network and become its largest validator. This represents 950 million monthly active users formally fusing to one blockchain. TON surged from $1.30 (April 28) to $2.89 (May 7), representing 110+% appreciation in 10 days.
Can Toncoin reach $10 by 2030?
$10 is within the bull case range ($8-$18 by 2030). Required conditions: TON Pay 2.0 successful Q2 2026 launch with meaningful adoption, MTONGA roadmap executing across all 7 steps, significant user conversion from Telegram’s 950M MAU to TON activity, Telegram Stars expansion driving transaction volume, validator economics scaling sustainably, and a regulatory environment supporting institutional access. The base case for 2030 is $3-$6.
What is the MTONGA roadmap?
MTONGA stands for “Make TON Great Again” – Pavel Durov’s 7-step roadmap for fully integrating Telegram’s ecosystem with the TON blockchain. Sequential elements include: Catchain 2.0 upgrade (completed April 2026), validator transition (in progress), TON Pay 2.0 (Q2 2026), TON Teleport for Bitcoin liquidity (mid-2026), expanded Telegram Stars (Q3 2026), and additional development phases through 2026-2027.
How does TON’s 0.6-second finality compare to other chains?
Catchain 2.0 brought TON’s block finality to 0.6 seconds, among the fastest of any major Layer 1. Comparison: Solana ~400ms (Alpenglow target 150ms), Aptos sub-second, Sui sub-second, Ethereum L1 ~12 seconds, Bitcoin ~10 minutes. TON’s performance enables consumer applications requiring near-instant settlement and supports microtransactions at $0.0005 fee level.
What are the main risks to TON’s bull case?
Six primary risks: (1) Pavel Durov’s legal situation escalating, affecting Telegram operations, (2) user conversion failing to materialize at meaningful scale, (3) MTONGA roadmap execution facing significant delays or scope reductions, (4) competitive displacement by Solana or emerging consumer chains, (5) Telegram strategic shifts reducing TON integration commitment, (6) regulatory deterioration affecting Telegram messenger or TON specifically.
What is TON Pay 2.0?
TON Pay 2.0 is the next major version of TON’s Layer 2 payment network, designed specifically for the Telegram ecosystem. It aims to make peer-to-peer and merchant payments nearly instant and extremely cheap, targeting sub-$0.0005 cost per transaction. The Q2 2026 launch is positioned to enable seamless microtransactions for Telegram’s billion-plus user base.
How does TON compare to Solana for consumer crypto?
Both target consumer applications with high performance. Solana advantages: deeper DeFi ecosystem ($5.5B TVL vs TON’s $1.2B), broader institutional adoption (Solana ETFs trading vs no TON ETFs yet), longer track record. TON advantages: 950M MAU Telegram distribution advantage (Solana has no comparable consumer platform), formal validator commitment from a major tech platform, Catchain 2.0 sub-second finality. Different consumer crypto adoption pathways.
Should I buy TON given the recent rally?
This piece does not provide investment advice. Current $2.50 represents partial repricing after the May 2026 shift. Further appreciation depends on MTONGA roadmap execution and user conversion. The asymmetric upside potential (if execution succeeds) versus downside risk (if execution fails or Durov regulatory issues escalate) requires individual assessment. The five-variable framework provides objective monitoring signals.
This article is for informational purposes and does not constitute financial or investment advice. Cryptocurrency markets are highly volatile, and price predictions are inherently speculative. The figures and analysis described reflect data available as of late May 2026. Always do your own research and consult with qualified financial professionals before making investment decisions.
Crypto World
Andy Burnham’s Path to Prime Minister Could Transform UK Crypto Policy
Key Takeaways
- Andy Burnham secured Makerfield constituency on June 18 with 54.8% of votes, positioning himself for Labour party leadership
- Prime Minister Keir Starmer anticipated to reveal resignation timeline on June 22, 2026
- Burnham has publicly expressed strong support for cryptocurrency, telling Web3 entrepreneurs he is fully committed to digital assets
- Current government implemented prohibition on cryptocurrency political donations in March 2026
- Over $11 million wagered on Polymarket regarding UK leadership transition, with Burnham leading predictions
By-elections rarely trigger immediate shifts in national governance. This particular contest may prove exceptional.
Andy Burnham, serving as Greater Manchester’s Mayor, captured the Makerfield parliamentary seat on June 18 with a commanding 54.8% majority. His margin over Reform UK exceeded 9,200 votes, with participation reaching nearly 59%—significantly higher than typical by-election engagement levels.
This electoral success eliminated the final procedural obstacle preventing a Labour leadership campaign. Almost immediately, speculation emerged that Prime Minister Keir Starmer was considering his position. While his office dismissed suggestions of an immediate departure, reports indicate cabinet members, union representatives, and party financiers have begun discussing transition arrangements.
Current expectations point toward Starmer announcing a departure schedule on June 22, 2026.
Implications for the Digital Asset Sector
The potential leadership change carries significant ramifications for the digital assets sector.
Starmer’s administration enacted a provisional prohibition on cryptocurrency contributions to political organizations in March 2026. This decision stemmed from recommendations in the independent Rycroft Review, which identified cryptocurrency’s pseudonymous nature as a potential conduit for foreign interference in British electoral politics.
Burnham has articulated a markedly different position. Addressing approximately 100 Web3 entrepreneurs at a Stand With Crypto gathering, he declared himself completely committed to the technology. He has consistently positioned Manchester as an emerging center for Web3 development, connecting this vision to the city’s manufacturing heritage.
Should Burnham assume the Prime Minister role, reconsideration of the cryptocurrency donation restriction appears probable. His tenure as Manchester’s mayor demonstrates consistent support for nascent technologies as economic catalysts.
Financial Markets Respond to Political Developments
Prediction platforms have registered rapid movement. Polymarket, the cryptocurrency-based forecasting platform, has seen over $11 million in positions taken on Britain’s leadership succession, with Burnham dominating as the anticipated successor.
Additionally, more than $2 million entered contracts specifically focused on Starmer’s exit timeline.
Traditional fixed-income markets have also demonstrated sensitivity. Britain’s 10-year government bond yield climbed to approximately 4.8% on Friday. Market participants appear more focused on Burnham’s anticipated fiscal stance than his cryptocurrency positioning.
The pound sterling declined in tandem with government bonds.
Bitcoin hovered around $63,900 during this timeframe, registering less than 1% daily appreciation. The cryptocurrency has declined roughly 17% over the previous month and 38% year-to-date, trading substantially below its October peak near $126,000. The political turbulence has not prompted a defensive rotation into cryptocurrency assets.
Digital asset adoption in the UK has also contracted. Financial Conduct Authority research indicates approximately 8% of British adults currently possess digital assets, declining from 12% in the prior year.
Burnham’s parliamentary induction and potential leadership declaration this week will establish the immediate trajectory for UK cryptocurrency regulation.
Crypto World
Morgan Stanley Amends ETH, SOL ETFs to Reveal Cheap Fees
Morgan Stanley has updated its filings for its Ether and Solana exchange-traded funds, revealing that it plans to charge the lowest fees among its rivals.
The company filed amended Form S-1 statements with the Securities and Exchange Commission for each ETF on Thursday, showing it plans to undercut the current market offerings and charge fees of 0.14% for each of its products.
The current lowest-fee spot Ether (ETH) ETF in the US is the Grayscale Ethereum Staking Mini ETF (ETH) at 0.15%, while Franklin Templeton’s spot Solana (SOL) ETF, the Franklin Solana ETF (SOEZ), charges the lowest fee among its competitors at 0.19%, according to Farside Investors.
It is the second time that Morgan Stanley has updated its ETF filings since it first filed for the ETFs in January, with amendments typically a signal that the SEC is close to approving the products for trading, which would make them the 11th spot Ether ETF and seventh spot Solana ETF to launch in the US.
Bloomberg ETF analyst Eric Balchunas posted to X on Friday that the fees make them “the cheapest in [the] US and [the] world.”

Source: Eric Balchunas
Low fees have been a tactic for Morgan Stanley as it looks to make a late entry into the spot crypto ETF market dominated by issuers such as BlackRock and Fidelity. Its Bitcoin (BTC) ETF, which launched in April, set its fees at 0.14%, below Grayscale’s 0.15% fee on its mini Bitcoin ETF.
Related: Grayscale HYPE ETF ‘likely imminent’ as new update shows competitive fee: Analyst
That fee likely helped Morgan Stanley’s Bitcoin fund to record a respectable first-day inflow of $30.6 million. The ETF has since seen total inflows of $331 million, surpassing ETFs from Invesco, Franklin Templeton and CoinShares, which all launched in January 2024.
Morgan Stanley’s latest filings also show that Figment, Galaxy Blockchain Infrastructure and Coinbase Canada will provide the staking services for each of the ETFs, with each fund having a 5% staking fee for the rewards earned by the product.
The Ethereum ETF, called the Morgan Stanley Ethereum Trust, will feature the ticker “MSSE,” while the Solana ETF, dubbed the Morgan Stanley Solana Trust, will trade under MSOL.
Magazine: Does ‘Paper Bitcoin’ mean there’s an unlimited supply of BTC?
Crypto World
Morgan Stanley Updates ETH and SOL ETF View, Flags Record-Low Fees
Morgan Stanley has amended its filings for spot Ether and spot Solana exchange-traded funds, setting fees it says are designed to be the lowest available in the US market for comparable products. The updates—made via amended Form S-1 statements—signal the firm is continuing to move toward an SEC decision that would allow the funds to begin trading.
According to the SEC filings lodged Thursday, Morgan Stanley plans to charge a fee of 0.14% for each ETF. If approved, the funds would expand Morgan Stanley’s presence in the fast-growing US spot crypto ETF lineup.
Key takeaways
- Morgan Stanley amended its SEC filings for both a spot Ether and a spot Solana ETF, targeting 0.14% fees.
- Farside Investors data cited in the article indicates existing lowest-fee spot products currently charge 0.15% for Ether and 0.19% for Solana.
- Amendments to Form S-1 have often been interpreted by the market as a sign of advancing SEC review and potential approval.
- Earlier, Morgan Stanley’s spot Bitcoin ETF launched with a 0.14% fee—matching its approach to undercut peers.
- Staking services for the proposed funds are set to involve Figment, Galaxy Blockchain Infrastructure, and Coinbase Canada, with a 5% staking fee on rewards.
Fees take center stage as SEC review advances
The core detail in Morgan Stanley’s latest updates is pricing. In the amended filings for each fund, the company states it intends to charge 0.14% annually. The move is particularly notable because it would place Morgan Stanley’s products at the low end of the fee spectrum for spot crypto ETFs in the US.
As background, Farside Investors data referenced in the article shows the current lowest-fee spot Ether ETF in the US is the Grayscale Ethereum Staking Mini ETF at 0.15%. For Solana, the lowest-fee spot offering cited is Franklin Templeton’s Franklin Solana ETF (SOEZ) at 0.19%, also based on Farside Investors’ figures.
Market watchers typically treat fee positioning as a proxy for how actively an issuer expects to compete for new assets. Lower expense ratios can make a fund more appealing to long-term allocators, especially when multiple spot crypto vehicles aim to track the same underlying assets.
Spot Ether and Solana proposals: what Morgan Stanley filed
The firm submitted amended Form S-1 statements for both proposed products on Thursday, as linked in the filings. The updates are the second set of amendments since Morgan Stanley first filed for the ETFs in January.
In practice, amendments are often read by the market as progress in negotiations and technical review—particularly because they generally appear closer to the moments when an issuer moves from preliminary review toward potential approval.
While the final SEC outcome is not guaranteed, the article notes that approval would add to the already expanding shelf of spot crypto products in the US, potentially bringing Morgan Stanley’s spot Ether ETF count to the 11th and spot Solana ETF count to the 7th among similar offerings, as described in the original coverage.
The specific fund naming and trading targets outlined in the article include:
- Morgan Stanley Ethereum Trust with ticker MSSE
- Morgan Stanley Solana Trust with ticker MSOL
Why “cheap” matters: Morgan Stanley’s Bitcoin playbook
Morgan Stanley has already used low fees as a market entry strategy in spot Bitcoin. Its Bitcoin ETF, launched in April, set its fee level at 0.14%, positioned below Grayscale’s 0.15% fee on its mini Bitcoin product, as noted in the article.
That fee decision appears to have been part of the firm’s early traction. The article references Cointelegraph coverage stating the fund recorded first-day inflows of $30.6 million and that total inflows have since reached $331 million, outpacing ETFs from Invesco, Franklin Templeton, and CoinShares that launched in January 2024.
Importantly, while inflow performance can be affected by many variables beyond fees—such as distribution reach, investor base, and timing—the repetition of a 0.14% expense ratio suggests Morgan Stanley is intentionally carrying forward a “competitive cost” approach across its crypto ETF expansion.
Staking services and the 5% reward fee
Morgan Stanley’s amended filings also address operational details tied to staking. The article says the filings indicate Figment, Galaxy Blockchain Infrastructure, and Coinbase Canada will provide staking services for each of the ETFs.
Under the structure described, each fund would apply a 5% staking fee to rewards earned by the product. This matters for investors because staking-related fees can change the effective return experienced by shareholders, particularly for spot products where staking can influence yield dynamics compared with a simple spot exposure approach.
Even with a low base expense ratio, staking economics can differ from the headline management fee. Investors generally look at both the fund’s stated expense level and any additional costs associated with custody, network participation, and reward allocation.
What to watch next
With Morgan Stanley’s spot Ether and Solana ETFs moving through an active amendment cycle—and with fees positioned at the low end versus currently available rivals—the next steps for investors are to monitor SEC feedback and any further filing updates that often precede approval decisions. The open question remains whether the SEC’s review will conclude in a timeframe that brings these products to market, and how staking-related costs ultimately shape investor outcomes versus existing offerings.
Crypto World
Ethereum could fund soon projects with up to 10% of staking rewards
Validators are entities that keep Ethereum running by locking up ether (ETH), checking transactions and earning staking rewards for doing so. Funding, in this context, means paying for the shared work Ethereum relies on, such as developer tools, security research, public infrastructure and other projects that help the network but do not always have a direct business model.
The proposal seeks to shift that burden toward validators, who earn ETH rewards for securing the network and benefit when Ethereum becomes more valuable.
It argued that validators are natural long-term stakeholders because better ecosystem funding can increase network activity, ETH burn and the value of staked ETH.

Validators could also select preferred funding recipients under the proposal. Those preferences would be combined into a ‘splitter’ contract that distributes redirected funds among chosen addresses. The design is meant to let validators “set and forget” their preferences rather than vote on every grant.
At current staking levels, the post estimated that validators receive roughly 700,000 ETH a year in rewards. A 5% to 10% redirect could send about 50,000 to 70,000 ETH a year toward ecosystem funding. That equates to about $120 million at ether’s current market prices.
The idea is likely to be controversial, however.
Crypto World
Bitcoin developers look to remove old fee signal that leaks wallet clues
For years, users looking to speed up their transactions on the Bitcoin blockchain relied on a handy optional feature that essentially says, “I might want to replace this transaction with a higher fee.”
But what started as a helpful tool has become redundant and a small privacy issue, prompting some developers to discuss possible ways to do away with it.
Let’s first take a look at the so-called replace-by-fee (RBF) signaling, then discuss the developers’ proposals.
Replace by fee (RBF) signaling
Imagine sending a paper check through the mail, but the postal system is stretched and congested. To ensure your payment doesn’t get stuck, the check has a small checkbox that says, “I reserve the right to cancel this check and write a new one with a higher rush fee if it gets delayed.” (The higher fee, of course, is an incentive for the postal system to prioritize your transaction.)
Such a feature is called Replace-by-Fee (RBF) in the Bitcoin ecosystem. For years, when you sent bitcoin, your wallet let you flip a switch, signaling to the network that you might want to “fee-bump” to speed up your transaction later.
Crypto World
Ethereum Layer 2 Taiko Urges Users to Withdraw Funds From Bridges, Confirms Security Breach
Taiko, the Ethereum layer 2 blockchain, has urged users to withdraw their funds from all bridges deployed on the network immediately.
This follows a confirmation of a security breach involving the network’s chain state verification mechanism.
We have confirmed a compromise of Taiko’s chain state verification mechanism. As a result, the security assumptions of all bridges deployed on Taiko can no longer be relied upon.
The team confirmed they are actively working with the Security Council and various ecosystem partners to contain the incident, pause the affected system wherever possible, and take both technical and legal actions.
So far, there’s no information on the amount of funds in jeopardy or if something has been stolen.
According to data from PeckShield, the exploit resulted in a loss of $1.7 million, while the attacker has already transferred 1.99 million TAIKO tokens, worth slightly less than $200K, to MEXC.
#PeckShieldAlert @taikoxyz has been exploited for ~$1.7M.
The exploiter has already transferred 1.99M $TAIKO (~$189.12K) to #MEXChttps://t.co/uJhqTYrqHH pic.twitter.com/Sl9kesSSUM
— PeckShieldAlert (@PeckShieldAlert) June 22, 2026
The post Ethereum Layer 2 Taiko Urges Users to Withdraw Funds From Bridges, Confirms Security Breach appeared first on CryptoPotato.
Crypto World
Altura shuts stablecoin vault after $8.5m redemption rush
Altura will begin winding down its stablecoin yield vault after a sharp rise in withdrawal requests over the weekend.
Summary
- Altura processed more than 8.5m USDT in instant redemptions before announcing the stablecoin vault wind-down.
- Withdrawal pressure followed Main Street’s msUSD depeg, though Altura said it had no direct exposure.
- Some portfolio positions need standard settlement periods, so redemptions will continue as underlying capital returns.
CEO Ranveer Arora said the protocol processed more than 8.5 million USDT in instant redemptions over 24 hours before deciding to close the vault in an orderly way.
Arora said the team made the move because of “sustained withdrawal demand and current market sentiment.” He added that Altura’s priority was user capital and that the team wanted all redemptions completed in a “fair, transparent, and efficient manner.” The announcement marks a sharp change for a vault built around stablecoin yield on HyperEVM.
Altura stablecoin vault positions now being unwound
Altura has notified counterparties and partners about the decision and started unwinding positions across the vault portfolio. Arora said those positions include allocations held on exchanges, private credit opportunities and real-world asset strategies.
Some positions can return capital quickly, while others need standard settlement and redemption periods. Arora said the team is working with counterparties to speed up the process where possible, and that capital will return to users as underlying positions are redeemed. He said the team will keep posting updates as more liquidity becomes available.
Main Street depeg fuels market concern
The wind-down followed wider concern across yield-bearing stablecoin markets after Main Street’s MSUSD lost its peg. The token fell sharply after Accountable, its proof-of-solvency provider, ended its service agreement with MainStreet and said the project was “unable to meet our verification standards.”
MainStreet later said its assets remained fully backed and blamed the market stress on the shutdown of a third-party proof-of-reserves dashboard. As previously reported by crypto.news, MSUSD traded far below its intended $1 peg while lending liquidity on the Morpho msY/USDC market tightened.
Altura blames misinformation and speculation
Altura said earlier that it had no direct exposure to Main Street or its strategies. It also said its HyperEVM lending vault, Alpha USDT Prime, the related USDT/AVLT market and borrowers using its Ethereum vault remained unaffected by the Main Street event.
Arora said Altura had worked around the clock through the weekend to process withdrawals and speak with partners and users. He criticized what he called “misinformation and speculation,” saying unfounded narratives had added to market fear and withdrawal pressure.
Stablecoin vault risks return to focus
DefiLlama data showed Altura with about $32.36 million in total value locked on Hyperliquid L1, with one tracked yield pool and an average APY near 17.49%. The vault had reached a peak total value locked of about $39 million on HyperEVM.
The case comes as demand for tokenized real-world asset and stablecoin yield products grows. Crypto.news recently reported that Plume and Ether.fi launched a $100 million yield-bearing RWA vault, while separate coverage of MSUSD showed how a proof-of-reserves dispute can quickly move into wider liquidity concerns.
Altura said it will keep giving updates as redemptions progress and new liquidity becomes available. For users, the main questions now are the speed of settlements, how much capital returns in each stage and whether the process can avoid rushed sales of slower portfolio positions. The protocol has not set a final completion date, leaving the redemption timeline tied to each position’s settlement terms.
Crypto World
3 Token Unlocks to Watch in the Final Week of June 2026
The crypto market will welcome tokens worth more than $735 million in the final week of June 2026. Major projects, including Humanity (H), MegaETH (MEGA), and Sahara AI (SAHARA), will release significant new token supplies.
These unlocks could introduce market volatility and influence short-term price movements. So, here’s a breakdown of what to watch.
1. Humanity (H)
- Unlock Date: June 25
- Number of Tokens to be Unlocked: 266.47 million H
- Released Supply: 2.8 billion H
- Total supply: 10 billion H
Humanity (H) is a decentralized identity protocol that utilizes biometric palm recognition, zero-knowledge proofs, and blockchain to verify the authenticity of real human users without exposing their personal data. It features a native Proof of Humanity (PoH) consensus mechanism.
On June 25, the protocol will unlock 266.47 million tokens. The tokens are worth $54.77 million and account for 9.41% of the released supply.
The unlock comes after the protocol suffered an exploit that resulted in losses exceeding $30 million. The H token plunged sharply following the incident. Although it recorded a notable recovery in the days that followed, the downtrend has since resumed amid growing macroeconomic and geopolitical pressures.
The team will split the released supply six ways. The ecosystem fund will receive 50 million H. Furthermore, Humanity will allocate 42.86 million altcoins to identity verification rewards and 12.50 million to the foundation operations treasury.
Additionally, early contributors will receive 79.17 million H. Investors will gain 55.56 million tokens. Finally, the Human Human Institute Strategic Reserve will receive 26.39 million H.
2. MegaETH (MEGA)
- Unlock Date: June 23
- Number of Tokens to be Unlocked: 250 million MEGA
- Released Supply: 757.5 million MEGA
- Total supply: 10 billion MEGA
MegaETH is an Ethereum Layer 2 network built for high-speed transaction processing. The network uses mini-blocks produced roughly every 10 milliseconds and targets over 100,000 transactions per second.
The network will release 250 million tokens on June 23, worth approximately $13.54 million. The unlock accounts for 32.8% of the released supply.
The team will direct the entire unlocked supply toward the Mainnet Campaign (Terminal).
3. Sahara AI (SAHARA)
- Unlock Date: June 26
- Number of Tokens to be Unlocked: 1.03 billion SAHARA
- Released Supply: 3.41 billion SAHARA
- Total supply: 10 billion SAHARA
Sahara AI is a full-stack, AI-native blockchain platform built to democratize the development and monetization of artificial intelligence. The network combines data services, AI tools, and a marketplace into one ecosystem.
On June 26, Sahara AI will unlock 1.03 billion SAHARA. The supply is worth $14.75 million. The tokens represent 30.10% of the released supply.
Sahara AI will direct 534.9 million tokens to early backers. The core team and contributors will get 406.25 million SAHARA. In addition, the team will allocate 53.02 million altcoins to ecosystem development and 31.25 million tokens for community incentives.
The unlock follows the token’s drop of over 50% earlier this month. The network said a “futures-led liquidation cascade” caused the price volatility.
In addition to these, other prominent unlocks that investors can look out for in the final week of June include Plasma (XPL), Soon (SOON), Newton Protocol (NEWT), and more.
The post 3 Token Unlocks to Watch in the Final Week of June 2026 appeared first on BeInCrypto.
Crypto World
Taiko warns users to exit bridges after $1m vault exploit
Taiko has urged users to withdraw funds from all bridges deployed on its network after confirming a compromise of its chain state verification mechanism.
Summary
- Taiko urged users to withdraw bridge funds after confirming a chain verification mechanism compromise.
- Blockaid said flawed source-signal proof checks enabled unauthorized releases from Taiko’s ERC20 Vault on Ethereum.
- Taiko also stopped proposers from producing blocks and asked exchanges to suspend TAIKO deposits immediately.
The Ethereum Layer 2 project said the security assumptions behind its bridge system could no longer be relied upon.
The notice followed alerts from blockchain security firm Blockaid, which said its exploit detection system found an ongoing attack on Taiko’s ERC20 Vault on Ethereum. Blockaid put losses at more than $1 million and shared the victim contract, attacker wallet and exploit transactions.
Blockaid points to Taiko proof validation flaw
Blockaid said the likely root cause was a flaw in Taiko bridge source-signal proof validation. The firm said crafted message proofs were accepted as valid on Ethereum L1 even though there were no matching legitimate “MessageSent” events on the Taiko source chain.
That allowed the attacker to register and later retrieve fraudulent bridge messages, leading to unauthorized asset releases from the ERC20 vault. Taiko later confirmed a broader verification problem and said it was working with the Security Council and ecosystem partners.
Moreover, Taiko also said all proposers had temporarily stopped producing new blocks while the team investigates and resolves the issue. The project asked centralized exchanges to suspend TAIKO deposits immediately and said deposits should resume only after an official notice.
The team published several attacker addresses as part of its update. It said it would take technical and legal steps where needed, but did not give a timeline for restoring bridge security or restarting block production.
Bridge risks remain in focus
Taiko is a Type 1 Ethereum-equivalent ZK-EVM rollup designed as a based rollup, where Ethereum L1 validators are expected to help order transactions. The network launched mainnet in May 2024 and supports Ethereum-compatible smart contracts and tools.
Meanwhile, crypto.news recently reported that cross-chain bridge exploits caused $28.6 million in May losses, or about 42% of that month’s total reported by CertiK.
The incident comes after other cross-chain security failures this year. As previously reported by crypto.news, Verus Protocol’s Ethereum bridge lost more than $11.5 million in a forged-transfer exploit, while Axelar disabled Secret Network bridge routes after a $4.7 million exploit.
Moreover, as crypto.news earlier reported, an old Aztec Connect contract lost about $2.1 million after a verification mismatch let unbacked balances move through Ethereum settlement records.
Crypto World
Wars Have Driven $12.3 Billion in VC Investment Into This Sector
Venture capital funds have poured $12.3 billion into defense technology startups since the start of 2026, nearly double the amount raised over the same stretch last year.
Conflicts in Ukraine and the Middle East have exposed an urgent demand for weapons systems that are cheaper and faster to build. That demand has turned military hardware into one of the year’s most sought-after bets.
VC Funds Pour $12.3 Billion Into Defence Tech in 2026
According to the Financial Times, the figure already exceeds the $9.95 billion the sector attracted across all of 2025. This signals how quickly investor appetite for drones, autonomous vessels, and battlefield artificial intelligence has grown.
The capital is concentrated among a small group of active investors. According to PitchBook, Gaingels, Alumni Ventures, and Andreessen Horowitz ranked among the most prolific check writers in the first quarter.
Daniel Rudnicki Schlumberger, head of JPMorgan’s security and resiliency initiative for Europe, the Middle East, and Asia, noted that the surging valuations come as funds increasingly treat defense as a lasting opportunity.
“We’re seeing the most important change in the way wars are being fought arguably ever,” Schlumberger said.
Follow us on X to get the latest news as it happens
Crypto Venture Funding Moves the Other Way
The defense rush stands in contrast to crypto, where venture investment has cooled sharply. Galaxy Research found that VCs deployed about $4 billion across 355 crypto deals in the first quarter.
That marked a 50% drop in capital from the prior quarter, though deal count fell only 16%.
“The decline from Q4’s spike was driven primarily by a drop in very large, later-stage financings. The number of completed deals fell much less than the amount of capital invested, indicating that smaller early-stage and seed rounds continued to get done even as Q1 lacked Q4’s concentration of mega-rounds,” Galaxy Research wrote.
Annualized, the pace implies roughly $16 billion in 2026, below last year’s near-$20 billion total. Meanwhile, new fund formation also stalled.
Crypto-focused venture funds drew about $1.1 billion in the first quarter, spread across just eight vehicles. That count marked the slowest quarter for new fund launches since the third quarter of 2020.
Galaxy attributed part of the shift to spot exchange-traded products and digital asset treasury firms, which now compete with venture funds for allocator capital. Still, the firm affirmed that “crypto venture activity remains relatively healthy overall.”
Subscribe to our YouTube channel to watch leaders and journalists provide expert insights
The post Wars Have Driven $12.3 Billion in VC Investment Into This Sector appeared first on BeInCrypto.
-
Crypto World7 days agoCrude Oil Plunges Over 4% as US-Iran Agreement Reopens Hormuz Strait
-
Tech6 days agoThe Adder At The Heart Of Intel’s 8087 FPU
-
Fashion3 days agoWeekend Open Thread: Miami – Corporette.com
-
Business2 days agoWall Street Week Ahead: Investors see Micron earnings as pulse check of AI rally momentum
-
Crypto World2 days agoHIVE shares jump as $220M AI deal speeds Bitcoin mining pivot
-
Sports3 days agoFIFA World Cup 2026: Canada beat 9-men Qatar 6-0 to register first ever win | FIFA World Cup 2026
-
Crypto World2 days agoJake Chervinsky accuses CME of protecting derivatives monopoly
-
Business1 day agoMHP SE 2026 Q1 – Results – Earnings Call Presentation (OTCMKTS:MHPSY) 2026-06-20
-
Crypto World4 days agoAnthropic’s Dario Amodei Urged AI Unity at G7, Even as US Banned His Models
-
Business3 days agoBrexit cost 6% of UK economy, Bank of England company data suggests
-
Business1 day agoSoccer-U.S. defends Iran World Cup travel restrictions, says discussions ongoing
-
Crypto World2 days ago
Can Charles Hoskinson Really Rescue Cardano?
-
Tech4 days agoWeeks Of In-The-Field Testing And A Verdict
-
Tech4 days agoAdobe adds its AI assistant to Premiere, Illustrator and InDesign
-
Politics2 days agoAndy Burnham and the meaning of Makerfield
-
Crypto World4 days ago
Iren (IREN) Stock Surges on Jefferies Buy Rating: AI Infrastructure Play Gains Momentum
-
Entertainment1 day agoRenter of Home in Anne Heche Crash Denies Settlement With Son
-
Tech3 days agoInstagram Now Lets You Add A Unique Caption To Each Carousel Slide
-
Politics3 days agoBBC Reporter Discusses Cross Party Criticism Of Trumps Iran Deal
-
News Videos3 days agoNightcore – MONEY ON THE DASH (Soft Rock Version) (Lyrics)


You must be logged in to post a comment Login