Crypto World
What crypto and stock traders should compare before choosing one
Disclosure: This article does not represent investment advice. The content and materials featured on this page are for educational purposes only.
AI trading robots evolve in 2026 as traders compare tools for stocks, crypto, automation, and market analysis.
Summary
- No-code AI trading robots are gaining popularity by helping beginners automate trading workflows without programming skills.
- These platforms typically offer guided strategy selection, risk-setting reviews, and automated execution through user-friendly dashboards.
- While no-code tools lower technical barriers, traders still need to understand strategy risks and review settings before activating automation.
AI trading robots have become one of the most searched topics among traders who want faster market monitoring, more structured execution, and better control over emotional decisions. In 2026, the phrase no longer refers to a single type of tool. Some platforms focus on AI stock scanning. Some are built for crypto bots. Others help traders automate technical alerts, build no-code strategies, or manage multi-market trading workflows.
That is why choosing an AI trading robot is not as simple as picking the most popular name on Google.
A stock trader looking for real-time market scanners may need a very different platform from a crypto trader who wants 24/7 automated execution. A beginner may prefer a simple dashboard and guided workflow, while an advanced trader may want backtesting, custom alerts, exchange integrations, or API-based strategy control.
This guide explains the main types of AI trading robot platforms in 2026, how traders compare them, which features matter most, and how beginners can approach automated trading tools more carefully.
What is an AI trading robot?
An AI trading robot is a software-based trading tool that uses market data, automation, algorithmic rules, and, in some cases, artificial intelligence models to support trading decisions or execute trading strategies.
Some AI trading robots scan the market and send alerts. Some generate trade ideas. Some connect to exchanges or brokers. Some allow traders to build automated strategies without writing code. Others focus on portfolio monitoring, risk settings, or execution support.
In practical use, an AI trading robot may help traders:
- Monitor markets in real time
- Identify possible trading conditions
- Follow predefined strategy rules
- Receive alerts when market patterns appear
- Automate parts of trade execution
- Backtest strategies before using them live
- Reduce emotional decision-making
- Review risk settings before activating automation
However, an AI trading robot should not be viewed as a guaranteed profit system. Markets remain uncertain, and automated tools can still produce losses. The real value of an AI trading robot is its ability to support a more organized trading workflow.
Why AI trading robots are getting more attention in 2026
The demand for AI trading robots has grown because financial markets have become faster, more data-heavy, and harder to monitor manually.
Crypto markets trade 24 hours a day. Stock markets react quickly to earnings, economic data, interest-rate expectations, and sector rotation. Forex markets move across global sessions. For retail traders, this creates a difficult environment: too much information, too many charts, and too little time.
AI trading robot platforms try to solve part of this problem by helping traders organize data, automate repetitive tasks, and follow rules more consistently.
For crypto traders, the appeal is especially clear. Bitcoin, Ethereum, and other digital assets can move sharply overnight or during weekends. A trader who relies only on manual chart watching may miss important changes. Automated tools can help track markets continuously and respond to predefined conditions.
For stock traders, AI tools are often used for scanning, alerts, idea generation, and technical analysis. Instead of searching through hundreds of tickers manually, traders can use AI-powered scanners or automated research tools to narrow down potential opportunities.
In both cases, the goal is not to remove risk. The goal is to create a more structured trading process.
The main types of AI trading robot platforms
Not all AI trading robots serve the same purpose. Before choosing one, traders should understand the different categories.
Platform Type
Common Use Case
Typical User
AI stock scanners
Finding stock trade ideas, alerts, and market signals
Active stock traders
Chart automation tools
Technical analysis, strategy alerts, chart-based workflows
Technical traders
Crypto trading bots
24/7 crypto automation, grid bots, DCA bots, exchange-connected strategies
Crypto traders
No-code strategy platforms
Building trading logic without programming
Beginners and semi-active traders
Multi-market AI trading workflows
Managing crypto, forex, and stock automation from a simplified interface
Users who want broader market access
Backtesting-focused tools
Testing strategies before live use
Strategy-driven traders
This distinction matters because a platform that is excellent for AI stock scanning may not be the best choice for crypto automation. A crypto bot platform may not offer the same technical charting depth as a dedicated analysis tool. A no-code automation platform may be easier for beginners but less flexible for developers.
The best choice depends on the trader’s market, experience level, risk tolerance, and preferred workflow.
AI stock scanners and market research platforms
Some of the most visible AI trading tools are stock-focused platforms. These tools are usually designed to help traders find opportunities in the stock market through real-time scanning, alerts, backtesting, and AI-assisted signals.
Platforms in this category may be useful for traders who want to scan large numbers of stocks quickly. Instead of manually checking hundreds of charts, users can rely on automated filters, market scanners, and alerts.
This type of tool may be suitable for:
- Day traders looking for stock movement
- Swing traders watching technical setups
- Traders who want real-time alerts
- Users who focus mainly on equities
- Traders who need market scanning more than full automation
However, stock scanner platforms are not always built for crypto-first automation. Traders who mainly want 24/7 crypto execution should check whether the platform supports digital assets, exchange connections, and crypto-specific strategy tools.
Chart automation and technical analysis tools
Another category includes platforms focused on chart automation, technical analysis, alerts, and strategy testing. These tools are often used by traders who already understand technical indicators but want a faster way to monitor setups.
Chart automation platforms may allow users to create alerts based on trendlines, indicators, price levels, or multi-factor conditions. Some also support strategy bots or automated execution through connected brokers or exchanges.
This type of platform may be useful for traders who want:
- Automated technical alerts
- Cloud-based chart monitoring
- Strategy testing
- Technical pattern recognition
- Chart-driven trade timing
- More control over custom conditions
The advantage is flexibility. Traders can build workflows around their own technical setups. The downside is that beginners may need time to understand how to configure alerts, indicators, and strategy logic properly.
For users who want a simpler starting point, a no-code AI trading robot workflow may be easier to understand than a fully customized technical setup.
No-code ai trading robots for beginners
One of the biggest changes in 2026 is the growth of no-code AI trading robot platforms. These tools are designed for users who want to explore automation without programming knowledge.
A no-code platform may allow users to choose a market, select a strategy direction, review risk settings, and activate an automated workflow from a dashboard. Instead of writing code or connecting complex APIs manually, beginners can interact with a more guided interface.
This type of platform may appeal to users who want:
- A simpler dashboard
- Guided strategy selection
- Automated strategy execution
- Risk review before activation
- Crypto, forex, or stock market access
- A lower technical barrier
- A more beginner-friendly trading workflow
No-code does not mean no risk. It simply means the user does not need to build the system from scratch. Traders should still understand the strategy, review settings, and avoid assuming that automation removes market uncertainty.
For beginners who do not want to code, an AI-assisted automated trading platform can be a more practical entry point than advanced bot-building software.
What traders should compare before choosing an AI trading robot
Choosing an AI trading robot should be based on features, risk controls, market coverage, and usability rather than hype.
Here are the most important factors to compare.
1. Market Coverage
Some platforms focus only on stocks. Others focus on crypto. Some support multiple markets such as crypto, forex, and stocks.
Traders should first ask: does the platform actually support the market I want to trade?
A stock scanner may not be useful for a crypto trader who needs exchange-connected automation. A crypto bot may not be useful for a stock trader who wants equity alerts and broker integration.
2. Automation Style
Different platforms automate different things. Some automate alerts. Some automate strategy testing. Some automate execution. Some only provide trade ideas.
Before choosing a platform, users should understand whether the tool is designed for:
- Market scanning
- Signal generation
- Technical alerts
- Strategy backtesting
- Trade execution
- Portfolio monitoring
- Full or partial automation
This distinction is important because many tools use the phrase “AI trading,” but their actual functions can be very different.
3. Ease of Use
A powerful platform is not always the best platform for beginners. Some tools require technical knowledge, API setup, advanced charting skills, or strategy-building experience.
Beginners may prefer platforms with:
- Clear dashboards
- Simple activation steps
- No-code settings
- Guided workflows
- Plain-language explanations
- Easy risk review
- Trial access or demo-style exploration
If a platform is too complex, users may make mistakes before they understand how the system works.
4. Risk Controls
Risk controls are one of the most important parts of any AI trading robot.
Users should check whether they can review position size, exposure limits, stop-loss behavior, take-profit settings, asset selection, strategy conditions, and pause options.
Automation without risk controls can be dangerous. A system that trades quickly can also lose quickly if the strategy is unsuitable for current market conditions.
A responsible trader should always review risk settings before using automated strategy execution tools.
5. Backtesting and Strategy Review
Backtesting allows users to test how a strategy may have performed under historical market conditions. It does not guarantee future performance, but it can help traders understand strategy behavior.
A good AI trading robot platform should help users evaluate whether a strategy is designed for trend-following, mean reversion, volatility, breakout trading, or another market condition.
Traders should be cautious with platforms that provide automation without helping users understand strategy logic.
AI trading robot platform comparison by use case
The best AI trading robot depends on what the trader needs. Instead of asking which platform is “best” overall, it is more useful to compare by use case.
Trader Need
Better Platform Type to Explore
Finding stock trade ideas
AI stock scanner
Creating technical chart alerts
Chart automation platform
Automating crypto strategies
Crypto trading bot platform
Testing rule-based strategies
Backtesting-focused platform
Avoiding code and complex setup
No-code AI trading robot
Managing multiple markets
Multi-market AI trading workflow
Learning automation step by step
Beginner-friendly dashboard
This approach is more practical because traders have different goals. A day trader, long-term investor, crypto user, and beginner will not always need the same tool.
How beginners can start with ai trading robots more carefully
Beginners should approach AI trading robots with patience. The goal should not be to activate automation immediately and expect fast results. The goal should be to understand the workflow.
Step 1: Learn the Platform Category
Before choosing a tool, users should identify whether they need a stock scanner, crypto bot, chart automation tool, or no-code trading workflow.
This prevents beginners from choosing a platform that does not match their real needs.
Step 2: Start With Simple Market Monitoring
Beginners can first use AI trading tools to observe markets, alerts, and strategy behavior. This helps users understand how automation reacts to changing conditions.
Step 3: Review Strategy Logic
Users should understand whether a strategy is based on trend-following, momentum, grid trading, DCA, breakout conditions, or another trading concept.
If the user cannot explain the basic logic, they should be cautious before activating automation.
Step 4: Check Risk Settings
Before using live automation, users should review position size, stop-loss behavior, asset exposure, and how to pause or adjust the system.
Risk settings are not optional. They are part of responsible trading.
Step 5: Use Trial Access or Small Exposure First
Beginners should avoid committing too much capital too quickly. A trial, demo, or small starting amount can help users learn the platform without rushing into larger decisions.
This is especially important in crypto, where sudden volatility can affect results quickly.
Common mistakes when choosing an AI trading robot
Many traders choose AI trading robots based on marketing claims rather than actual workflow. This can lead to poor decisions.
The most common mistakes include:
- Choosing a platform only because it appears in search results
- Assuming “AI” means guaranteed profits
- Using a stock-focused tool for crypto automation without checking support
- Ignoring risk controls
- Starting with too much capital
- Not understanding strategy logic
- Relying on automation without monitoring results
- Believing every trading bot works the same way
A better approach is to compare tools by market, automation style, risk controls, transparency, and ease of use.
Are AI trading robots worth using in 2026?
AI trading robots can be useful when they help traders improve structure, consistency, and market awareness. They may help users monitor markets, follow strategy rules, test ideas, and reduce emotional decision-making.
However, they are not suitable for everyone.
Traders who expect guaranteed profits may be disappointed. Traders who ignore risk settings may face serious losses. Traders who do not understand the platform may misuse automation.
AI trading robots are worth exploring when users treat them as tools, not promises.
A responsible user should ask:
- Does this platform fit my market?
- Do I understand the strategy?
- Can I control risk?
- Can I monitor performance?
- Is the dashboard clear enough for my experience level?
- Does the platform explain what the automation actually does?
When these questions are answered carefully, AI trading robots can become part of a more disciplined trading workflow.
Final thoughts
AI trading robot platforms in 2026 are not all the same. Some are built for stock scanning. Some focus on chart automation. Some are designed for crypto trading bots. Others provide no-code workflows for users who want easier access to automated strategy execution.
The best platform depends on the trader’s market, experience level, risk tolerance, and need for control.
For stock traders, AI scanners and technical analysis tools may be useful for identifying market opportunities. For crypto traders, 24/7 automation, exchange support, and risk settings may matter more. For beginners, a simple dashboard and no-code workflow can make the first step easier.
The smartest way to choose an AI trading robot is not to follow hype. It is to compare platforms based on real use cases: market coverage, automation style, transparency, risk controls, and usability.
AI trading robots can help traders become more organized, but they cannot remove market risk. Used carefully, they can support better trading workflows. Used blindly, they can create new problems.
In 2026, the traders who benefit most from AI trading robots will likely be those who combine automation with discipline, risk awareness, and realistic expectations.
FAQs about AI trading robot platforms
What is an AI trading robot?
An AI trading robot is a software-based trading tool that uses automation, market data, algorithmic rules, or AI-assisted models to support trading analysis or strategy execution.
Are AI trading robots only for crypto trading?
No. AI trading robots can be used in stocks, crypto, forex, and other markets. However, each platform has different market coverage, so users should check whether the tool supports the assets they want to trade.
Can AI trading robots guarantee profits?
No. AI trading robots cannot guarantee profits. They may help traders follow strategies more consistently, but all trading involves risk, especially in volatile markets like crypto.
What type of AI trading robot is best for beginners?
Beginners may prefer no-code AI trading robot platforms with simple dashboards, clear strategy workflows, risk settings, and trial access. Complex tools may be better for experienced traders.
What should traders compare before choosing an AI trading robot?
Traders should compare market coverage, automation style, risk controls, ease of use, backtesting tools, transparency, platform category, and whether the workflow fits their trading goals.
Are crypto trading bots different from AI stock scanners?
Yes. Crypto trading bots often focus on 24/7 digital asset automation and exchange-connected strategies. AI stock scanners usually focus on equities, alerts, market scanning, and trade idea generation.
Is no-code automation enough for serious traders?
No-code automation can be useful for beginners and users who want a simpler workflow. More advanced traders may still prefer custom strategy tools, API access, or deeper backtesting features.
How should beginners start with AI trading robots?
Beginners should start by learning the platform category, reviewing strategy logic, checking risk settings, using trial access or small exposure first, and monitoring performance over time.
Disclosure: This content is provided by a third party. Neither crypto.news nor the author of this article endorses any product mentioned on this page. Users should conduct their own research before taking any action related to the company.
Crypto World
Morgan Stanley Updates ETH and SOL ETF View, Flags Record-Low Fees
Morgan Stanley has amended its filings for spot Ether and spot Solana exchange-traded funds, setting fees it says are designed to be the lowest available in the US market for comparable products. The updates—made via amended Form S-1 statements—signal the firm is continuing to move toward an SEC decision that would allow the funds to begin trading.
According to the SEC filings lodged Thursday, Morgan Stanley plans to charge a fee of 0.14% for each ETF. If approved, the funds would expand Morgan Stanley’s presence in the fast-growing US spot crypto ETF lineup.
Key takeaways
- Morgan Stanley amended its SEC filings for both a spot Ether and a spot Solana ETF, targeting 0.14% fees.
- Farside Investors data cited in the article indicates existing lowest-fee spot products currently charge 0.15% for Ether and 0.19% for Solana.
- Amendments to Form S-1 have often been interpreted by the market as a sign of advancing SEC review and potential approval.
- Earlier, Morgan Stanley’s spot Bitcoin ETF launched with a 0.14% fee—matching its approach to undercut peers.
- Staking services for the proposed funds are set to involve Figment, Galaxy Blockchain Infrastructure, and Coinbase Canada, with a 5% staking fee on rewards.
Fees take center stage as SEC review advances
The core detail in Morgan Stanley’s latest updates is pricing. In the amended filings for each fund, the company states it intends to charge 0.14% annually. The move is particularly notable because it would place Morgan Stanley’s products at the low end of the fee spectrum for spot crypto ETFs in the US.
As background, Farside Investors data referenced in the article shows the current lowest-fee spot Ether ETF in the US is the Grayscale Ethereum Staking Mini ETF at 0.15%. For Solana, the lowest-fee spot offering cited is Franklin Templeton’s Franklin Solana ETF (SOEZ) at 0.19%, also based on Farside Investors’ figures.
Market watchers typically treat fee positioning as a proxy for how actively an issuer expects to compete for new assets. Lower expense ratios can make a fund more appealing to long-term allocators, especially when multiple spot crypto vehicles aim to track the same underlying assets.
Spot Ether and Solana proposals: what Morgan Stanley filed
The firm submitted amended Form S-1 statements for both proposed products on Thursday, as linked in the filings. The updates are the second set of amendments since Morgan Stanley first filed for the ETFs in January.
In practice, amendments are often read by the market as progress in negotiations and technical review—particularly because they generally appear closer to the moments when an issuer moves from preliminary review toward potential approval.
While the final SEC outcome is not guaranteed, the article notes that approval would add to the already expanding shelf of spot crypto products in the US, potentially bringing Morgan Stanley’s spot Ether ETF count to the 11th and spot Solana ETF count to the 7th among similar offerings, as described in the original coverage.
The specific fund naming and trading targets outlined in the article include:
- Morgan Stanley Ethereum Trust with ticker MSSE
- Morgan Stanley Solana Trust with ticker MSOL
Why “cheap” matters: Morgan Stanley’s Bitcoin playbook
Morgan Stanley has already used low fees as a market entry strategy in spot Bitcoin. Its Bitcoin ETF, launched in April, set its fee level at 0.14%, positioned below Grayscale’s 0.15% fee on its mini Bitcoin product, as noted in the article.
That fee decision appears to have been part of the firm’s early traction. The article references Cointelegraph coverage stating the fund recorded first-day inflows of $30.6 million and that total inflows have since reached $331 million, outpacing ETFs from Invesco, Franklin Templeton, and CoinShares that launched in January 2024.
Importantly, while inflow performance can be affected by many variables beyond fees—such as distribution reach, investor base, and timing—the repetition of a 0.14% expense ratio suggests Morgan Stanley is intentionally carrying forward a “competitive cost” approach across its crypto ETF expansion.
Staking services and the 5% reward fee
Morgan Stanley’s amended filings also address operational details tied to staking. The article says the filings indicate Figment, Galaxy Blockchain Infrastructure, and Coinbase Canada will provide staking services for each of the ETFs.
Under the structure described, each fund would apply a 5% staking fee to rewards earned by the product. This matters for investors because staking-related fees can change the effective return experienced by shareholders, particularly for spot products where staking can influence yield dynamics compared with a simple spot exposure approach.
Even with a low base expense ratio, staking economics can differ from the headline management fee. Investors generally look at both the fund’s stated expense level and any additional costs associated with custody, network participation, and reward allocation.
What to watch next
With Morgan Stanley’s spot Ether and Solana ETFs moving through an active amendment cycle—and with fees positioned at the low end versus currently available rivals—the next steps for investors are to monitor SEC feedback and any further filing updates that often precede approval decisions. The open question remains whether the SEC’s review will conclude in a timeframe that brings these products to market, and how staking-related costs ultimately shape investor outcomes versus existing offerings.
Crypto World
Ethereum could fund soon projects with up to 10% of staking rewards
Validators are entities that keep Ethereum running by locking up ether (ETH), checking transactions and earning staking rewards for doing so. Funding, in this context, means paying for the shared work Ethereum relies on, such as developer tools, security research, public infrastructure and other projects that help the network but do not always have a direct business model.
The proposal seeks to shift that burden toward validators, who earn ETH rewards for securing the network and benefit when Ethereum becomes more valuable.
It argued that validators are natural long-term stakeholders because better ecosystem funding can increase network activity, ETH burn and the value of staked ETH.

Validators could also select preferred funding recipients under the proposal. Those preferences would be combined into a ‘splitter’ contract that distributes redirected funds among chosen addresses. The design is meant to let validators “set and forget” their preferences rather than vote on every grant.
At current staking levels, the post estimated that validators receive roughly 700,000 ETH a year in rewards. A 5% to 10% redirect could send about 50,000 to 70,000 ETH a year toward ecosystem funding. That equates to about $120 million at ether’s current market prices.
The idea is likely to be controversial, however.
Crypto World
Bitcoin developers look to remove old fee signal that leaks wallet clues
For years, users looking to speed up their transactions on the Bitcoin blockchain relied on a handy optional feature that essentially says, “I might want to replace this transaction with a higher fee.”
But what started as a helpful tool has become redundant and a small privacy issue, prompting some developers to discuss possible ways to do away with it.
Let’s first take a look at the so-called replace-by-fee (RBF) signaling, then discuss the developers’ proposals.
Replace by fee (RBF) signaling
Imagine sending a paper check through the mail, but the postal system is stretched and congested. To ensure your payment doesn’t get stuck, the check has a small checkbox that says, “I reserve the right to cancel this check and write a new one with a higher rush fee if it gets delayed.” (The higher fee, of course, is an incentive for the postal system to prioritize your transaction.)
Such a feature is called Replace-by-Fee (RBF) in the Bitcoin ecosystem. For years, when you sent bitcoin, your wallet let you flip a switch, signaling to the network that you might want to “fee-bump” to speed up your transaction later.
Crypto World
Ethereum Layer 2 Taiko Urges Users to Withdraw Funds From Bridges, Confirms Security Breach
Taiko, the Ethereum layer 2 blockchain, has urged users to withdraw their funds from all bridges deployed on the network immediately.
This follows a confirmation of a security breach involving the network’s chain state verification mechanism.
We have confirmed a compromise of Taiko’s chain state verification mechanism. As a result, the security assumptions of all bridges deployed on Taiko can no longer be relied upon.
The team confirmed they are actively working with the Security Council and various ecosystem partners to contain the incident, pause the affected system wherever possible, and take both technical and legal actions.
So far, there’s no information on the amount of funds in jeopardy or if something has been stolen.
According to data from PeckShield, the exploit resulted in a loss of $1.7 million, while the attacker has already transferred 1.99 million TAIKO tokens, worth slightly less than $200K, to MEXC.
#PeckShieldAlert @taikoxyz has been exploited for ~$1.7M.
The exploiter has already transferred 1.99M $TAIKO (~$189.12K) to #MEXChttps://t.co/uJhqTYrqHH pic.twitter.com/Sl9kesSSUM
— PeckShieldAlert (@PeckShieldAlert) June 22, 2026
The post Ethereum Layer 2 Taiko Urges Users to Withdraw Funds From Bridges, Confirms Security Breach appeared first on CryptoPotato.
Crypto World
Altura shuts stablecoin vault after $8.5m redemption rush
Altura will begin winding down its stablecoin yield vault after a sharp rise in withdrawal requests over the weekend.
Summary
- Altura processed more than 8.5m USDT in instant redemptions before announcing the stablecoin vault wind-down.
- Withdrawal pressure followed Main Street’s msUSD depeg, though Altura said it had no direct exposure.
- Some portfolio positions need standard settlement periods, so redemptions will continue as underlying capital returns.
CEO Ranveer Arora said the protocol processed more than 8.5 million USDT in instant redemptions over 24 hours before deciding to close the vault in an orderly way.
Arora said the team made the move because of “sustained withdrawal demand and current market sentiment.” He added that Altura’s priority was user capital and that the team wanted all redemptions completed in a “fair, transparent, and efficient manner.” The announcement marks a sharp change for a vault built around stablecoin yield on HyperEVM.
Altura stablecoin vault positions now being unwound
Altura has notified counterparties and partners about the decision and started unwinding positions across the vault portfolio. Arora said those positions include allocations held on exchanges, private credit opportunities and real-world asset strategies.
Some positions can return capital quickly, while others need standard settlement and redemption periods. Arora said the team is working with counterparties to speed up the process where possible, and that capital will return to users as underlying positions are redeemed. He said the team will keep posting updates as more liquidity becomes available.
Main Street depeg fuels market concern
The wind-down followed wider concern across yield-bearing stablecoin markets after Main Street’s MSUSD lost its peg. The token fell sharply after Accountable, its proof-of-solvency provider, ended its service agreement with MainStreet and said the project was “unable to meet our verification standards.”
MainStreet later said its assets remained fully backed and blamed the market stress on the shutdown of a third-party proof-of-reserves dashboard. As previously reported by crypto.news, MSUSD traded far below its intended $1 peg while lending liquidity on the Morpho msY/USDC market tightened.
Altura blames misinformation and speculation
Altura said earlier that it had no direct exposure to Main Street or its strategies. It also said its HyperEVM lending vault, Alpha USDT Prime, the related USDT/AVLT market and borrowers using its Ethereum vault remained unaffected by the Main Street event.
Arora said Altura had worked around the clock through the weekend to process withdrawals and speak with partners and users. He criticized what he called “misinformation and speculation,” saying unfounded narratives had added to market fear and withdrawal pressure.
Stablecoin vault risks return to focus
DefiLlama data showed Altura with about $32.36 million in total value locked on Hyperliquid L1, with one tracked yield pool and an average APY near 17.49%. The vault had reached a peak total value locked of about $39 million on HyperEVM.
The case comes as demand for tokenized real-world asset and stablecoin yield products grows. Crypto.news recently reported that Plume and Ether.fi launched a $100 million yield-bearing RWA vault, while separate coverage of MSUSD showed how a proof-of-reserves dispute can quickly move into wider liquidity concerns.
Altura said it will keep giving updates as redemptions progress and new liquidity becomes available. For users, the main questions now are the speed of settlements, how much capital returns in each stage and whether the process can avoid rushed sales of slower portfolio positions. The protocol has not set a final completion date, leaving the redemption timeline tied to each position’s settlement terms.
Crypto World
3 Token Unlocks to Watch in the Final Week of June 2026
The crypto market will welcome tokens worth more than $735 million in the final week of June 2026. Major projects, including Humanity (H), MegaETH (MEGA), and Sahara AI (SAHARA), will release significant new token supplies.
These unlocks could introduce market volatility and influence short-term price movements. So, here’s a breakdown of what to watch.
1. Humanity (H)
- Unlock Date: June 25
- Number of Tokens to be Unlocked: 266.47 million H
- Released Supply: 2.8 billion H
- Total supply: 10 billion H
Humanity (H) is a decentralized identity protocol that utilizes biometric palm recognition, zero-knowledge proofs, and blockchain to verify the authenticity of real human users without exposing their personal data. It features a native Proof of Humanity (PoH) consensus mechanism.
On June 25, the protocol will unlock 266.47 million tokens. The tokens are worth $54.77 million and account for 9.41% of the released supply.
The unlock comes after the protocol suffered an exploit that resulted in losses exceeding $30 million. The H token plunged sharply following the incident. Although it recorded a notable recovery in the days that followed, the downtrend has since resumed amid growing macroeconomic and geopolitical pressures.
The team will split the released supply six ways. The ecosystem fund will receive 50 million H. Furthermore, Humanity will allocate 42.86 million altcoins to identity verification rewards and 12.50 million to the foundation operations treasury.
Additionally, early contributors will receive 79.17 million H. Investors will gain 55.56 million tokens. Finally, the Human Human Institute Strategic Reserve will receive 26.39 million H.
2. MegaETH (MEGA)
- Unlock Date: June 23
- Number of Tokens to be Unlocked: 250 million MEGA
- Released Supply: 757.5 million MEGA
- Total supply: 10 billion MEGA
MegaETH is an Ethereum Layer 2 network built for high-speed transaction processing. The network uses mini-blocks produced roughly every 10 milliseconds and targets over 100,000 transactions per second.
The network will release 250 million tokens on June 23, worth approximately $13.54 million. The unlock accounts for 32.8% of the released supply.
The team will direct the entire unlocked supply toward the Mainnet Campaign (Terminal).
3. Sahara AI (SAHARA)
- Unlock Date: June 26
- Number of Tokens to be Unlocked: 1.03 billion SAHARA
- Released Supply: 3.41 billion SAHARA
- Total supply: 10 billion SAHARA
Sahara AI is a full-stack, AI-native blockchain platform built to democratize the development and monetization of artificial intelligence. The network combines data services, AI tools, and a marketplace into one ecosystem.
On June 26, Sahara AI will unlock 1.03 billion SAHARA. The supply is worth $14.75 million. The tokens represent 30.10% of the released supply.
Sahara AI will direct 534.9 million tokens to early backers. The core team and contributors will get 406.25 million SAHARA. In addition, the team will allocate 53.02 million altcoins to ecosystem development and 31.25 million tokens for community incentives.
The unlock follows the token’s drop of over 50% earlier this month. The network said a “futures-led liquidation cascade” caused the price volatility.
In addition to these, other prominent unlocks that investors can look out for in the final week of June include Plasma (XPL), Soon (SOON), Newton Protocol (NEWT), and more.
The post 3 Token Unlocks to Watch in the Final Week of June 2026 appeared first on BeInCrypto.
Crypto World
Taiko warns users to exit bridges after $1m vault exploit
Taiko has urged users to withdraw funds from all bridges deployed on its network after confirming a compromise of its chain state verification mechanism.
Summary
- Taiko urged users to withdraw bridge funds after confirming a chain verification mechanism compromise.
- Blockaid said flawed source-signal proof checks enabled unauthorized releases from Taiko’s ERC20 Vault on Ethereum.
- Taiko also stopped proposers from producing blocks and asked exchanges to suspend TAIKO deposits immediately.
The Ethereum Layer 2 project said the security assumptions behind its bridge system could no longer be relied upon.
The notice followed alerts from blockchain security firm Blockaid, which said its exploit detection system found an ongoing attack on Taiko’s ERC20 Vault on Ethereum. Blockaid put losses at more than $1 million and shared the victim contract, attacker wallet and exploit transactions.
Blockaid points to Taiko proof validation flaw
Blockaid said the likely root cause was a flaw in Taiko bridge source-signal proof validation. The firm said crafted message proofs were accepted as valid on Ethereum L1 even though there were no matching legitimate “MessageSent” events on the Taiko source chain.
That allowed the attacker to register and later retrieve fraudulent bridge messages, leading to unauthorized asset releases from the ERC20 vault. Taiko later confirmed a broader verification problem and said it was working with the Security Council and ecosystem partners.
Moreover, Taiko also said all proposers had temporarily stopped producing new blocks while the team investigates and resolves the issue. The project asked centralized exchanges to suspend TAIKO deposits immediately and said deposits should resume only after an official notice.
The team published several attacker addresses as part of its update. It said it would take technical and legal steps where needed, but did not give a timeline for restoring bridge security or restarting block production.
Bridge risks remain in focus
Taiko is a Type 1 Ethereum-equivalent ZK-EVM rollup designed as a based rollup, where Ethereum L1 validators are expected to help order transactions. The network launched mainnet in May 2024 and supports Ethereum-compatible smart contracts and tools.
Meanwhile, crypto.news recently reported that cross-chain bridge exploits caused $28.6 million in May losses, or about 42% of that month’s total reported by CertiK.
The incident comes after other cross-chain security failures this year. As previously reported by crypto.news, Verus Protocol’s Ethereum bridge lost more than $11.5 million in a forged-transfer exploit, while Axelar disabled Secret Network bridge routes after a $4.7 million exploit.
Moreover, as crypto.news earlier reported, an old Aztec Connect contract lost about $2.1 million after a verification mismatch let unbacked balances move through Ethereum settlement records.
Crypto World
Wars Have Driven $12.3 Billion in VC Investment Into This Sector
Venture capital funds have poured $12.3 billion into defense technology startups since the start of 2026, nearly double the amount raised over the same stretch last year.
Conflicts in Ukraine and the Middle East have exposed an urgent demand for weapons systems that are cheaper and faster to build. That demand has turned military hardware into one of the year’s most sought-after bets.
VC Funds Pour $12.3 Billion Into Defence Tech in 2026
According to the Financial Times, the figure already exceeds the $9.95 billion the sector attracted across all of 2025. This signals how quickly investor appetite for drones, autonomous vessels, and battlefield artificial intelligence has grown.
The capital is concentrated among a small group of active investors. According to PitchBook, Gaingels, Alumni Ventures, and Andreessen Horowitz ranked among the most prolific check writers in the first quarter.
Daniel Rudnicki Schlumberger, head of JPMorgan’s security and resiliency initiative for Europe, the Middle East, and Asia, noted that the surging valuations come as funds increasingly treat defense as a lasting opportunity.
“We’re seeing the most important change in the way wars are being fought arguably ever,” Schlumberger said.
Follow us on X to get the latest news as it happens
Crypto Venture Funding Moves the Other Way
The defense rush stands in contrast to crypto, where venture investment has cooled sharply. Galaxy Research found that VCs deployed about $4 billion across 355 crypto deals in the first quarter.
That marked a 50% drop in capital from the prior quarter, though deal count fell only 16%.
“The decline from Q4’s spike was driven primarily by a drop in very large, later-stage financings. The number of completed deals fell much less than the amount of capital invested, indicating that smaller early-stage and seed rounds continued to get done even as Q1 lacked Q4’s concentration of mega-rounds,” Galaxy Research wrote.
Annualized, the pace implies roughly $16 billion in 2026, below last year’s near-$20 billion total. Meanwhile, new fund formation also stalled.
Crypto-focused venture funds drew about $1.1 billion in the first quarter, spread across just eight vehicles. That count marked the slowest quarter for new fund launches since the third quarter of 2020.
Galaxy attributed part of the shift to spot exchange-traded products and digital asset treasury firms, which now compete with venture funds for allocator capital. Still, the firm affirmed that “crypto venture activity remains relatively healthy overall.”
Subscribe to our YouTube channel to watch leaders and journalists provide expert insights
The post Wars Have Driven $12.3 Billion in VC Investment Into This Sector appeared first on BeInCrypto.
Crypto World
Taiko Bridge Exploited for Up to $1.7M in DeFi Hack
Taiko, an Ethereum layer-2 blockchain, has urged its users to withdraw assets from the network’s bridges after an exploit on one of its bridge protocols saw attackers make off with $1.7 million in the latest decentralized finance hack this month.
“We have confirmed a compromise of Taiko’s chain state verification mechanism,” Taiko posted to X early on Monday. “As a result, the security assumptions of all bridges deployed on Taiko can no longer be relied upon.”
“We strongly advise all users to withdraw their funds from all bridges deployed on Taiko immediately,” it added.
It is the latest in a series of crypto protocol exploits this month, which now number at least 23, according to DeFiLlama. The Humanity Protocol and Syscoin Bridge, which lost over $30 million and $8 million, respectively, have been the largest two exploits so far in June.

Source: Taiko
Taiko said it was coordinating partners to contain the incident and had paused affected systems.
Crypto security firm Blockaid said that the root cause appears to be a flaw in how the Taiko bridge validated source signals.
It said that message proofs were accepted as valid on Ethereum without corresponding legitimate proofs on the Taiko blockchain.
“This allowed the attacker to register and later retrieve fraudulent bridge messages, resulting in unauthorized asset releases from the ERC20 vault,” Blockaid said.
Blockaid estimated that at least $1 million had been stolen, while Lookonchain and PeckShield suggested the value of assets stolen could be as high as $1.7 million.
The exploiter has already transferred 1.99 million Taiko (TAIKO) tokens worth around $189,000 to MEXC, stated PeckShield. TAIKO is currently trading down 98% from its 2024 peak at $0.084, according to CoinGecko.
Related: Secret Network bridge exploited for $4.7M with ‘infinite mint’ bug
Blockchain intelligence firm Arkham shows Taiko exploiter wallets holding around $1.5 million, primarily in Ether (ETH).

The Taiko exploiter account holds more than $1.5 million in ETH. Source: Arkham Intelligence
Exploits in June are mounting up
The attack comes just days after the discovery on Friday of a smart contract exploit on the Secret Network, which resulted in the theft of $4.67 million worth of assets.
On Saturday, around $1.1 million was drained from the OLPC/LABUBU liquidity pool on PancakeSwap. LABUBU is a memecoin inspired by the popular toys of the same name.
Other notable exploits in June include Aztec Connect, RetoSwap, Raydium AMM, and the largest one so far this month, Humanity Protocol.
Magazine: Bitcoin decouples from tech stocks, Ether eyes ‘selling wave’: Market Moves
Crypto World
4 Things That Could Move Crypto Markets This Week
Crypto markets spent the weekend in the red as hopes for a peace deal between the US and Iran remain fragile.
US equity market futures have opened lower as investors await details of US-Iran talks in Switzerland, according to the Kobeissi Letter.
Meanwhile, President Trump has ramped up the rhetoric again, posting on Truth Social on Sunday:
“Iran must immediately stop their highly paid proxies in Lebanon from causing trouble. If they don’t, we’ll hit Iran very hard again, just like we did last week, only harder!!!”
Economic Events June 22 to 26
The week kicks off with June’s S&P Global PMI data on Tuesday, and May’s new home sales figures are out on Wednesday.
However, all eyes are on the May Personal Consumption Expenditures (PCE) report, the Federal Reserve’s preferred inflation measure, due on Thursday.
The data follows last week’s FOMC meeting, where policymakers held interest rates steady while signaling a more inflation-focused monetary policy stance.
If PCE comes in hotter than expected, which is likely given that energy prices are rising, markets could price in fewer rate cuts, and risk assets may face pressure.
“The June FOMC meeting, with half of the committee leaning toward a tighter policy path, sent a hawkish jolt through markets,” said Bloomberg analysts.
“Even though Warsh didn’t submit his own dot for the dot plot, his tone at the news conference seemed notably hawkish to us. A hot PCE inflation reading will likely reinforce that hawkish message.”
The current odds for a rate hike at the Fed’s next meeting in late July are around 40%, according to the CME Fed Watch tool.
More economic data follows on Thursday with the US first-quarter GDP report, shedding light on the rate of economic growth.
June’s Michigan consumer sentiment data and inflation expectations data are due out on Friday, rounding off a busy week for economic reports.
Key Events This Week:
1. June S&P Global PMI data – Tuesday
2. May New Home Sales data – Wednesday
3. May PCE Inflation data – Thursday
4. US Q1 2026 GDP data – Thursday
5. June MI Consumer Sentiment data – Friday
6. June MI Inflation Expectations data – Friday
The…
— The Kobeissi Letter (@KobeissiLetter) June 21, 2026
Crypto Market Outlook
Crypto markets spent the weekend mostly flat, with total capitalization hovering around $2.3 trillion. More volatility is expected this week, and the path of least resistance is downwards.
Bitcoin has been trading tightly around $64,000, where it is at the time of writing on Monday morning in Asia. There has been a quick dip towards $63,000, but it recovered quickly. The weekly close was at $63,267, forming a support base.
Ether prices remain at multi-year lows, struggling to make any headway above $1,700, while most altcoins are still in retreat.
The post 4 Things That Could Move Crypto Markets This Week appeared first on CryptoPotato.
-
Crypto World7 days agoCrude Oil Plunges Over 4% as US-Iran Agreement Reopens Hormuz Strait
-
Tech6 days agoThe Adder At The Heart Of Intel’s 8087 FPU
-
Fashion3 days agoWeekend Open Thread: Miami – Corporette.com
-
Business2 days agoWall Street Week Ahead: Investors see Micron earnings as pulse check of AI rally momentum
-
Crypto World2 days agoHIVE shares jump as $220M AI deal speeds Bitcoin mining pivot
-
Sports3 days agoFIFA World Cup 2026: Canada beat 9-men Qatar 6-0 to register first ever win | FIFA World Cup 2026
-
Crypto World2 days agoJake Chervinsky accuses CME of protecting derivatives monopoly
-
Business1 day agoMHP SE 2026 Q1 – Results – Earnings Call Presentation (OTCMKTS:MHPSY) 2026-06-20
-
Crypto World4 days agoAnthropic’s Dario Amodei Urged AI Unity at G7, Even as US Banned His Models
-
Business3 days agoBrexit cost 6% of UK economy, Bank of England company data suggests
-
Business1 day agoSoccer-U.S. defends Iran World Cup travel restrictions, says discussions ongoing
-
Crypto World2 days ago
Can Charles Hoskinson Really Rescue Cardano?
-
Tech4 days agoWeeks Of In-The-Field Testing And A Verdict
-
Tech4 days agoAdobe adds its AI assistant to Premiere, Illustrator and InDesign
-
Politics2 days agoAndy Burnham and the meaning of Makerfield
-
Entertainment1 day agoRenter of Home in Anne Heche Crash Denies Settlement With Son
-
Crypto World4 days ago
Iren (IREN) Stock Surges on Jefferies Buy Rating: AI Infrastructure Play Gains Momentum
-
Tech3 days agoInstagram Now Lets You Add A Unique Caption To Each Carousel Slide
-
Politics3 days agoBBC Reporter Discusses Cross Party Criticism Of Trumps Iran Deal
-
News Videos3 days agoNightcore – MONEY ON THE DASH (Soft Rock Version) (Lyrics)

You must be logged in to post a comment Login