For years, Apple TV+ has been associated with very specific success stories. For instance, its biggest cultural hits have largely been feel-good, accessible shows that invited broad audiences in, and it shaped expectations around what kind of series could truly thrive on the platform.
That is why a recent shift in Apple TV+’s internal rankings is actually more significant than it might look at first glance. One of the service’s most slow-burning originals, a series that is built on ambiguity, dread, and corporate paranoia, is now occupying space that was traditionally dominated by a much lighter and more crowd-pleasing Ted Lasso.
That series is Severance, created by Dan Erickson and executive-produced and directed by Ben Stiller. Severance has never been designed for passive viewing. Its premise follows employees who undergo a procedure that separates their work memories from their personal lives completely. Over time, that approach helped the show build a dedicated following, but it also positioned it as an unlikely candidate to challenge Apple TV+’s most recognizable hit, Ted Lasso, which currently sits at the #5 spot. And yet, as of February 12, 2026, Severance is sitting at #4 on Apple TV+’s Top 10 chart in the United States.
Advertisement
Apple’s Bold Move Paves the Way for ‘Severance’ Season 3
Severance has spent much of its existence in a delicate position, with long gaps between seasons, rising production costs, and behind-the-scenes complications. All this has made its future feel deliberately opaque, even as audience interest continued to grow. That uncertainty has lingered in the background for years, especially after the show’s ambitious second season raised questions about how sustainable its scale really was.
Behind the scenes, however, Apple appears to have been thinking several steps ahead. The show’s cultural footprint, critical standing, and unusually deep fan engagement have all played a role in shifting how Apple views its place on the platform. That shift has now become concrete, since Apple has officially acquired the full intellectual property rights to Severance. This has brought the series entirely in-house under Apple Studios. The move not only clears the path for Season 3 but might also unlock a fourth season, with the door open for future expansions beyond the main storyline.
Severance Seasons 1 and 2 are available to watch on Apple TV. The show has also been renewed for Season 3, whereas Season 4 is currently in talks. Stay tuned to Collider for more updates.
Plenty of movie stars have plans to feature in multiple projects this year, but few actors are as busy as Rebecca Ferguson. She began 2026 by starring opposite Chris Pratt in the Amazon MGM-backed sci-fi thriller, Mercy. The film was met with a poor critical reception, and it also underwhelmed at the box office. She’s already followed this with a role in The Immortal Man, the Peaky Blinders sequel movie co-starring Cillian Murphy and Barry Keoghan. The film will act as a connecting point between the original Peaky Blinders series and the sequel series, which is now in production. Ferguson can also be seen in international theaters starring opposite Andrew Garfield in The Magic Faraway Tree, which is officially her first perfect movie of the year — it debuted to a flawless 100% from critics on the aggregate site Rotten Tomatoes.
Ferguson isn’t anywhere near done after The Magic Faraway Tree leaves theaters, though. She’ll also make her long-awaited return as Juliette Nichols in the third season of Silo, which she’s confirmed will premiere sometime this summer. She’ll close out the year by reprising her role as Lady Jessica one final time in Dune: Part Three, though she’s revealed she’ll have only one scene in the film. Still, Ferguson couldn’t have asked for a better start to the year. Both Mercy and The Immortal Man, her first two projects of 2026, are sitting comfortably at the top of streaming charts on Prime Video and Netflix, respectively. This makes her the first star of 2026 to have two hits charting in the #1 spot on different streamers at the same time — the year of Rebecca Ferguson is officially upon us.
Everyone deserves a perfect score now and then, so today’s challenge is designed to be easy-peasy. You’ll go 8-for-8 and feel great about it!
Advertisement
Rebecca Ferguson Could Yet Return to ‘Peaky Blinders’
Around the same time Peaky Blinders: The Immortal Man came out, Rebecca Ferguson was asked if she could see herself returning to the franchise in the future. She admitted that she hasn’t heard any concrete plans for a return, but that she’s absolutely open to it. Regardless, a Peaky Blinders sequel series has been confirmed and is already filming. Ferguson is one of the biggest talents in Hollywood, and if she’s willing, Steven Knight will likely have no trouble finding something for her to do in the new Peaky Blinders sequel series, especially considering she has an established connection with Duke Shelby.
Check out Mercy on Prime Video and The Immortal Man on Netflix, and stay tuned to Collider for more streaming updates and coverage of Ferguson’s future projects.
Taking a book and turning it into a motion picture is a practice almost as old as cinema itself. Since the days of Georges Méliès, who offered his cinematic takes on literary classics like Cinderella and From the Earth to the Moon, filmmakers have been taking stories from the page to the big screen, experimenting with how the differences between the written word and the cinematic language can be most effectively combined.
Sometimes, the books adapted belong to authors that have since passed away. Other times, the authors are still alive and kicking and commend these cinematic adaptations of their work, no matter how involved they were in their making. On a few noteworthy occasions, however, authors have been quite vocal about their intense dislike for a certain movie adaptation of a book of theirs. From novelists like Stephen King to comic writers like Alan Moore, these are authors who clearly didn’t think the cinematic medium did their work justice. For fairness’ sake, entries will be limited to only one per author. Otherwise, a list of this nature would end up being composed purely of King and Moore adaptations.
Advertisement
10
‘Tales from Earthsea’ (2006)
Image via Toho
Ursula K. Le Guin was one of the greatest and most important American writers of her generation, known mainly for her work in speculative fiction. The collection of fantasy stories and essays known as Tales from Earthseais perhaps her best-known work, and for good reason. Fans couldn’t have possibly been more excited when a Studio Ghibli adaptation of the first four books in the series was announced, which would be Gōro Miyazaki‘s (son of Hayao Miyazaki) directing debut. The rest is history, just not particularly pleasant history.
[Le Guin] felt like the film told a completely different story from the source material.
Advertisement
There are those who would go so far as to call Ghibli’s Tales from Earthsea one of the worst anime movies of all time. Le Guin herself probably would never have gone that far, but she did state that Miyazaki misunderstood the spirit of her books so terribly that she felt like the film told a completely different story from the source material. You’d be hard-pressed to find an Earthsea book fan who would disagree.
9
‘Charlotte’s Web’ (1973)
Image via Paramount Pictures
Advertisement
E. B. White, perhaps best-known as the creator of Stuart Little, was one of the greatest American children’s literature authors in modern history. He also wrote Charlotte’s Web, an illustrated book that, before being turned into a live-action film starring Dakota Fanning in 2006, was turned into a Hanna-Barbera musical cartoon in 1973.
Audiences today mostly remember it fondly as one of the movies that proved 1970s animation was by no means bad, but White wasn’t fond of the film at all. On the contrary, though the author was slightly involved in the movie’s story, he was generally displeased with the final product, calling it “a travesty.” He hated the fact that the movie was a musical, which he felt didn’t gel well with what he had written.
8
‘Rawhead Rex’ (1986)
The monstrous Rawhead Rex monster snarls in Rawhead Rex.Image via Empire Pictures
Advertisement
Legendary British horror author Clive Barker is perhaps best known as the man who wrote the Hellraiser series. When it came time to turn the book into a film, he decided to write and direct it himself. The reason? Rawhead Rex, an adaptation of Barker’s short story of the same name directed by George Pavlou, from a screenplay by Barker himself.
The movie was a colossal failure, and is still remembered as one of the worst horror movies of the ’80s. Barker, obviously, felt that the elements were all there on the page for Rawhead Rex to have been quite a thrilling film. He felt, however, that Pavlou’s direction fell short, failing to provide the stylish oomph that would have made the movie as strong as the source material.
7
‘I Know What You Did Last Summer’ (1997)
Image via Columbia Pictures
Advertisement
Following the success of Wes Craven‘s 1996 slasher classic Scream, many terrible rip-offs followed. Jim Gillespie‘s I Know What You Did Last Summermay be iconic, but there’s no way of denying that it’s just that: a terrible Scream rip-off. It didn’t have to be that way, though. The movie wasn’t based on a horror novel, but rather a well-regarded 1973 YA thriller by Lois Duncan.
Duncan’s daughter, Kaitlyn Arquette, was shot to dead in 1989. In a 2002 interview, the author revealed that as the mother of a murdered young woman, she was absolutely appalled by the fact that her novel had been turned into a silly, cheap slasher. It’s difficult to blame her, made even more difficult by the fact that the film isn’t even a good slasher to begin with.
6
‘Willy Wonka & the Chocolate Factory’ (1971)
Image via Paramount Pictures
Advertisement
As one of the most important voices in the modern history of children’s literature, Roald Dahl is someone who needs no introduction. Another person who needs no introduction is Willy Wonka, and fittingly, Willy Wonka & the Chocolate Factory, one of the best fantasy movie masterpieces of all time, has a reputation that precedes it. A lesser-known part of that reputation, however, is that Dahl hated the film.
In fairness, Dahl hated the vast majority of the movies based on his work, thinking that Hollywood had a tendency to twist his stories into things he had never intended. His dislike for Willy Wonka, however, was particularly strong. He disowned the movie and declared himself “infuriated” by its plot deviations, its being a musical, and its shifting the narrative’s focus from Charlie to Wonka. The original book purist, Dahl would have vastly preferred it if director Mel Stuart had stuck far more closely to what was already on the page, even if this has proven to age as one of the best family movies of all time.
5
‘The NeverEnding Story’ (1984)
Wolfgang Petersen‘s first English-language film, The NeverEnding Storyis one of the most iconic family films of the ’80s, even if some find it to traumatizingly dark that its “family film” status is not uncontested. It was based on German writer Michael Ende‘s 1979 book of the same title, and it was a hit both with critics and at the box office.
Advertisement
Someone it wasn’t a hit with, however, was Ende himself. The author only got to see the script days before the movie’s premiere, and claimed to have been “horrified” by what he saw. He felt that Petersen completely changed the essence and spirit of the book, and later called the film a “gigantic melodrama of kitsch, commerce, plush and plastic.”
4
‘Percy Jackson & the Olympians: The Lightning Thief’ (2010) and ‘Percy Jackson: Sea of Monsters’ (2013)
A teenage boy stands in a museum with a shield with two of his friends behind him looking up at something.Image via 20th Century Studios
Of the many book series that tried to be the next Harry Potter, few came as remarkably close with something as original, fun, and genuinely high-quality as Rick Riordan‘s Percy Jackson & the Olympians book series. But out of every book-to-film adaptation that’s nothing like the books, few cases are as egregious as The Lightning Thiefand Sea of Monsters, the movies based on the first two installments in the saga.
Advertisement
Riordan was extremely vocal about how he felt about these movies. He said the writing was terrible, and not just because it deviated tremendously from the source material. He shared email recommendations for script changes that he sent to the people behind the movies—recommendations that clearly went unheard. Most of all, the author was bothered because he knew that these adaptations would anger and disappoint fans. It’s no wonder why Riordan became far more directly involved with the new Disney+ TV series adaptation of Percy Jackson.
3
‘Mary Poppins’ (1964)
Bert (Dick Van Dyke) and Mary Poppins (Julie Andrews) covered in soot look into the distance in Mary PoppinsImage via Walt Disney Studios Motion Pictures
Mary Poppinsis widely recognized as one of the most perfect live-action Disney movies of all time, a marvelously magical and beautifully nostalgic musical bolstered by Julie Andrews and Dick Van Dyke‘s lead performances. It’s based on Autralian-British writer P. L. Travers‘ Mary Poppins book series, and Walt Disney‘s repeated decades-spanning attempts to buy the film rights to her books made for such an arduous production process that it became the subject of the Tom Hanks and Emma Thompson-starring Saving Mr. Banks.
Advertisement
Contrary to what the ending of Saving Mr. Banks depicts, however, Travers did not, in fact, like what Disney did with her books. Travers famously cried at the movie’s premiere due to how distorted and saccharine her story and characters had become as a result of their Disney-ification. She hated the animated segments, she objected to the musical numbers, and she disliked the casting of Julie Andrews in the titular role. Audiences, of course, have disagreed with Travers over the course of the film’s existence; but one can only sympathize with her sadness.
Allan Quartmain aims a revolver as he stands by the bar in a messy library room.Image via 20th Century Studios
Another author who famously hates pretty much any and every film that’s ever been made about their work is Alan Moore. The writer is of the vehement opinion that it’s impossible to turn a comic book into a film that properly captures its essence, and as a result, adaptations of his work—from Zack Snyder‘s Watchmen to James McTeigue‘s V for Vendetta—rub him the wrong way. But out of every movie adaptation of his oeuvre, Moore had the most contempt for Stephen Norrington‘s The League of Extraordinary Gentlemen.
Advertisement
In all fairness to Moore, this is far and away one of the most abysmal superhero movies ever made, so it’s difficult to blame him for disliking it. What really added salt to the wound, however, was the lawsuit brought forward against 20th Century Studios by Larry Cohen and Martin Poll, who claimed that the studio had plagiarized their script. Moore got tangled up in the whole ordeal, and that only made League all the more of an unpleasant experience.
1
‘The Shining’ (1980)
Jack holds a frightened Danny in his lap in The ShiningImage via Warner Bros. Pictures
As one of the authors whose work is most often adapted by Hollywood, and not often with good results, Stephen Kingis someone with a long track record of being critical of big-screen adaptations of his work. But the most notorious King adaptation that he despised, and perhaps the most notorious case of an author hating a movie based on their work, is Stanley Kubrick‘s The Shining. Based on the third novel King ever wrote, many think of this ’80s classic as one of the greatest horror movies ever made, complete with one of the scariest movie villains of all time—but the author himself disagreed.
Advertisement
King’s dislike for Kubrick’s movie has become a subject of study itself, with fans having spent the last 46 years diving deep into why King might have felt such an aversion to this version of The Shining. He once said that it was the only adaptation of his novels that he could truly remember hating, calling it “maddening, perverse, and disappointing.” He admitted to Kubrick’s brilliance as a director, but felt that the film twisted the message and essence of what he had written as an allegory for alcoholism (with many autobiographical elements) into something he couldn’t recognize. Knowing King’s deeply personal connection to the story, it becomes impossible to blame him for hating what even the film’s biggest fans must admit is vastly different from the source material.
“I mean, we’re trying. It’s just hard,” Kristen, 43, exclusively shared with Us Weekly while celebrating season 3 of Bravo’s hit reality show. “It’s not like I don’t find him to be the most attractive person in the world, which I do, or that I don’t want that for us. But I’m just tired all the time, and I’m in survival mode. I’m just hyperfocused on [our baby] Kaia.”
During the season 3 premiere of The Valley on Wednesday, April 1, viewers watched Kristen’s fiancé open up to costar Jesse Lally about life after becoming a dad.
“Our relationship is completely lacking intimacy, which is tough,” Luke shared in the episode. “She shuts down every advance. At what point do you stop trying?”
While some things never change, the cast of Vanderpump Rules is used to a shake-up … and a touch-up. Vanderpump Rules was introduced to Bravo viewers during a special episode of The Real Housewives of Beverly Hills in January 2013. Season 1 starred Lisa Vanderpump, Stassi Schroeder, Scheana Shay, Jax Taylor, Katie Maloney, Tom Sandoval […]
During a lunch date with Nia Sanchez, Kristen also admitted that she hasn’t had a date night with her man in nearly three months and acknowledged that she isn’t in love with her body after giving birth.
Advertisement
“We’ve always had a healthy sex life,” she explained in a confessional interview. “But sex made a baby, and sex doesn’t exist.”
In a separate interview with Us, Luke acknowledged that things have improved since filming wrapped.
“You know, it’s a roller-coaster becoming new parents,” he shared. “I hope all new parents can identify with that. It’s still an up-and-down thing. We do improve. We move past things and something else comes up. So, overall, yes, things have improved.”
As for wedding planning, Luke said there haven’t been any major updates since welcoming a baby. That doesn’t mean a special ceremony isn’t going to happen in the future.
Advertisement
“Ball’s in her court. I have also put a line in the sand that I am a hard no on a wedding that’s going to cost six figures before we have a house that we own,” he explained. “So that’s my line.”
Getty Images (3) The Valley star Tom Schwartz is weighing in on the drama between the Summer House cast amid Amanda Batula and West Wilson’s controversial — and confirmed — romance. “I hope it’s not crashing down, because they have such a beautiful dynamic in that house,” Tom, 43, exclusively told Us Weekly of his […]
Through all the ups and downs of life, both Luke and Kristen are happy to have the support of their close friends Nia and Danny Booko.
“Nia and Danny, all my friends that have had babies, women online are super supportive,” Kristen shared with Us. “Our relationship took a back seat, but we know that that’s something we have to put more energy into.”
Advertisement
The Valley airs on Bravo Wednesdays at 8 p.m. Stream new episodes the next day on Peacock.
Jen Shah has opened up about serving time at a Texas prison with convicted sex trafficker Ghislaine Maxwell, revealing that Maxwell showed “no remorse” for her late boyfriend Jeffrey Epstein’s victims.
“I had limited interactions with her,” the Real Housewives of Salt Lake Cityalum, 52, told People in an interview published on Wednesday, April 1. “I chose that. I chose to keep my distance.”
After pleading guilty to conspiracy to commit wire fraud in connection with a telemarketing scheme, Shah served time at the same Bryan, Texas, federal prison camp where Maxwell, 64, and convicted fraudster Elizabeth Holmes were also incarcerated.
Shax described Maxwell’s “experience” in prison as “very different” than anything she or Holmes, 42, endured.
Advertisement
“[Maxwell] is treated very differently there,” Shah said. “I didn’t have a lot of interaction with her … She would come over and talk to us or I would see her … She made it very publicly known, at least to Elizabeth and I, that there’s no remorse there.”
The Bravo star went on, “Again, I obviously don’t know all the details of the case or whatever but we know enough. It was a lot when the [Epstein] victims would be on TV and talking, she [showed] just complete disregard for them. This was when they were pouring their hearts out in front of Congress for the [Epstein Files] to be released.”
“To see that kind of behavior when there are real victims that you’re seeing and what they’ve gone through, and to be so dismissive of that, that just didn’t sit right with me,” Shah added.
Maxwell was sentenced to 20 years behind bars following her 2022 conviction on charges of conspiracy to entice minors to travel to engage in illegal sex acts, conspiracy to transport minors to participate in illegal sex acts, transporting a minor to participate in illegal sex acts, sex trafficking conspiracy, and sex trafficking of a minor. (Maxwell maintains her innocence and has publicly appealed to President Donald Trump for a pardon.)
Advertisement
Shah insisted that both she and Holmes “definitely” chose to keep their distance from Maxwell once they noticed her alleged ambivalence toward Epstein’s victims. (Epstein died by suicide at age 66 in August 2019 after being arrested on federal sex crimes charges.)
Ghislaine Maxwell in 2013.Laura Cavanaugh/Getty Images
“I just feel like there should be a level of remorse for the victims,” Shah argued. “And she made it very publicly known — at least to Elizabeth and I — that there’s no remorse there. She outrightly said it.”
Shah raised concern over Maxwell’s alleged favorable treatment in prison, claiming that the former socialite received privileges that other inmates had no access to.
“[Maxwell] was treated very well there. She was afforded things that nobody else was afforded, like private workout sessions, special meals, bottled water,” Shah told People. “Everybody witnessed it, and I know that firsthand because I worked in [recreation] so I would have to clean things up. I was also asked for certain equipment because she was going to go work out late at night.”
Shah went on to say, “There’s a process you have to go through to schedule your legal calls. She would not have to go through the same process.”
Advertisement
In response to Shah’s allegations, a spokesperson for the Bureau of Prisons told People that its staff is “committed to maintaining the highest standards of integrity, impartiality, and professionalism in the operation of its facilities.”
“Staff are required to treat all inmates equitably, in accordance with law, policy, and institutional security and safety protocols. Any deviation from this standard undermines public trust and the fair administration of justice,” a BOP statement read. “Violations of this policy are subject to a full range of disciplinary actions, up to and including removal from federal service and potential criminal prosecution.”
Us Weekly has reached out to the Bureau of Prisons for comment.
The Real Housewives of Salt Lake City alum Jen Shah is a free woman. After serving less than three years of her six-and-a-half-year sentence for her role in a long-running nationwide telemarketing fraud scheme, the Bravo star was released from the Federal Prison Camp in Bryan, Texas, on December 10, 2025. “Jen Shah has demonstrated […]
Shah seemingly had a much friendlier rapport with former Theranos CEO Holmes, who was found guilty on four counts of fraud and conspiracy to commit fraud against investors in 2022.
“Lizzie and I are good friends,” Shah told the publication. “As another high-profile prisoner, there are just certain things you’re both dealing with, so you naturally come together in those instances.”
Advertisement
Thank You!
You have successfully subscribed.
For her part, Shah insisted that she is working to repay the $6.6 million she owes in restitution for allegedly defrauding elderly clients as part of a telemarketing scheme.
“I’d like to say that I’m sorry and I’m here and accepting responsibility and have made it my mission as part of my consequences to make sure that people are paid back through the restitution,” she said. “These people deserve to be made whole.”
A well-known reality TV couple is speaking out after a frightening road rage encounter in Los Angeles that they say left them shaken and fearing for their lives. Celebrity designer Pol’ Atteu and his husband Patrik Simpson say they were targeted during a violent confrontation while driving through West Hollywood, sparking renewed concerns about safety and crime in the area. The incident, which unfolded in broad daylight, has since prompted the reality TV stars to call for stronger action against rising crime.
Road Rage Incident Turns Violent In West Hollywood
ZUMAPRESS.com / MEGA
According to Atteu and Simpson, the ordeal began at the intersection of Melrose Avenue and Vine Street when a man driving a Toyota 4Runner allegedly cut off their Mercedes. What followed quickly escalated into a terrifying encounter, with the man reportedly attacking their vehicle.
The couple says they locked themselves inside as the suspect punched the driver’s side window and kicked the door. “I thought he was gonna kill us. I thought I was going to die,” Atteu told Daily Mail.
Simpson echoed the fear of the moment, adding, “We were literally like trapped rats. And then he came running towards the car, and I saw my life flash before my eyes. I think if he had broken that window, then we would not be here today.”
Advertisement
911 Call Leaves Couple Frustrated
Newscom/MEGA
After the suspect fled the scene, the couple attempted to follow from a distance while calling 911 in hopes of identifying the driver. However, they say the response they received from the dispatcher left them stunned.
Instead of assistance, they were reportedly told to stop pursuing the suspect or risk being held liable. “It was like they were trying to turn it around and say that we were in the wrong for following the guy,” Simpson said. “All we were trying to do was to get the license plate, because if I did not have the license plate number, we would not be able to do anything, and we want to catch this man and prosecute him.”
Police Response Raises Questions
Designer Who Was Assaulted at Fashion Show Aims to Take a Public Stance
Pol’ Atteu and his husband Patrik Simpson want to create a coalition to support victims of hate crimes. pic.twitter.com/nM47HFzPQH
— NFT ERC404 Official (@SianChay1901) May 13, 2024
Once officers eventually arrived, the couple claims they were instructed to file a report online rather than receive immediate assistance at the scene. “You’d think they would want to take my name down, my information down, like different things that have to do with us so that they can find a way to get back to us,” Atteu said.
Advertisement
Simpson added, “The fact is, if I’m being accosted or whatever this is that happened, whatever the right legal term is, the police weren’t offering us any help.”
The couple ultimately filed a vandalism report and has since shared video of the incident with their social media followers, where they boast a sizable audience. “I think in this day and age you have to be your own champion,” Simpson said. “I’m not saying that you take justice into your own hands, but you have to seek accountability.”
Past Attack Adds To Ongoing Safety Concerns
A gay designer was attacked at a California fashion show in 2019. His assailant was just sentenced
After years of legal proceedings, justice is served in the high-profile hate crime assault on fashion designer Pol’ Atteu. pic.twitter.com/B5j6dRzI7R
For Atteu and Simpson, this isn’t the first time they say they’ve been impacted by violent crime in California. In 2019, Atteu was hospitalized after being attacked during a charity fashion show at St. John’s Cathedral in downtown Los Angeles.
The suspect in that case, identified as Jesus Rodolfo Zepeda, was reportedly upset that his daughter had not been selected to participate in the event. Although he was initially arrested, he was later released due to COVID-related jail constraints.
Years later, in 2024, he was convicted of assault and received a suspended five-year prison sentence, serving only a brief period in custody.
Couple Calls For Action Amid Growing Crime Concerns
Man to Serve 4 Days in Jail for Assaulting Gay Fashion Designer
Jesus Zepeda received a suspended 5-year sentence for his attack on designer Pol’ Atteu, who fought to have it recognized as a hate crime. pic.twitter.com/V1wV2J8z0Y
Following the latest incident, Atteu and Simpson are using their platform to speak out and call attention to what they describe as a growing safety issue.
Known for their high-profile clientele, including Carrie Underwood, Hillary Clinton, and the late Anna Nicole Smith, the couple has long been part of Hollywood’s social scene. Now, they’re hoping their experience sparks a larger conversation about public safety and accountability.
As they continue to process the frightening ordeal, the couple believes more needs to be done to prevent similar incidents from happening again.
Editor’s Note: The following contains spoilers for The Rookie Season 8, Episode 13.The LAPD’s Mid-Wilshire Division is currently facing a crisis in The Rookie Season 8, and it might open a pathway for a former rookie to make his return. Seth Ridley (Patrick Keleher), the failed former rookie of Lucy Chen (Melissa O’Neil) and John Nolan (Nathan Fillion), from Season 7, came back this week in the latest episode, “The Thinker,” seeking reinstatement in the LAPD’s field training officer program. Although he did not achieve that goal in “The Thinker,” Seth has genuinely proven he wants to make a fresh start, and his actions in this episode prove that he has earned a redemptive arc in The Rookie.
LAPD’s Recruiting Crisis Opens a Path for Seth Ridley’s Return
Sgt. Tim Bradford (Eric Winter) reveals in “The Thinker” that the LAPD is facing an employment crisis, with rising retirements and declining recruits. Also, a bunch of other Mid-Wilshire officers literally win the lottery, signaling their collective resignation and sparking a big recruitment drive. Enter Seth Ridley, who made his presence known at the function and wishes to be reinstated into the LAPD. Despite Seth getting his lower leg amputated due to a shotgun wound in the Season 7 episode, “The Return,” John did encourage him to continue in law enforcement, provided that he is totally honest from that point forward.
Advertisement
Obviously, Lucy and Tim were not happy about this development with Seth, but Officer Miles Penn (Deric Augustine) was more than willing to endorse giving Seth a second chance. The LAPD needs officers on the streets, meaning that Seth presents a strong case for getting his job back. As John pointed out in “The Return,” Seth’s saving John’s life earned him a lot of goodwill in the department. Seth also saved Mile’s life and aided in the arrest of a dangerous fugitive earlier in Season 8 in “Baja.” All those factors should be taken into account for Seth’s potential return to the LAPD.
Seth Has Earned His Redemption Arc in ‘The Rookie’
Seth did commit some grievous acts as a rookie in Mid-Wilshire. However, he took John’s words to heart, and his personal and professional lives suffered massively as a result. Case in point, Seth hit rock bottom when the character initially returned in “The Red Place.” However, hitting rock bottom and Miles’ pep talk in that episode clearly affected Seth, as he finally took steps to stop feeling sorry for himself and own up to his mistakes. Although Miles is biased, he fully vouches for Seth and believes he deserves a second chance, which counts for a lot.
Later in the episode, Tim and Lucy request that Seth take a polygraph test as a condition for considering the former rookie’s reinstatement. Seth did take the polygraph test, with many harsh truths coming to light, including the incident in the Season 7 episode, “Wildfire,” where Seth failed to inform Tim and Lucy that they were entering a dangerous zone during a wildfire evacuation, endangering their lives. Seth also admits to fabricating his cancer diagnosis. Seth passes his polygraph, but Tim explains that Seth’s admissions regarding the wildfire incident are problematic, as they would have to be reported to Internal Affairs, hurting his chances of reinstatement into the FTO program.
The latest Pentagon storyline isn’t the only espionage the show has planned.
Although Lucy and Tim laid out why Tim’s actions of saving John’s life do not make up for his past mistakes, the revelation came off like a punch in the gut. Seth was completely honest and owned up to his past errors. Instead, Lucy and Tim basically utilized the session as entrapment against Seth to block him from ever returning to the force, despite Lucy and Tim both recognizing Seth’s sincere efforts and showing genuine respect for Seth’s honesty. Their actions in this episode came off more like payback against Seth, rather than a justified punishment. Although Tim is in charge of the recruitment drive, he and Lucy shouldn’t have been allowed to oversee the polygraph test, as they are biased parties.
Advertisement
Seth Ridley’s Exit Felt Less Than Final
Seth Ridley and Miles Penn meet with Officer Smitty in The Rookie Season 8.Image via Disney/Mike Taing
Despite Lucy and Tim’s ruling, something tells us that we have not seen the last of Seth Ridley. His appearance in “The Thinker” came off as less than final, suggesting the issue of his potential return to the FTO program could still be revisited in the near future. The LAPD is still suffering from a lack of recruits, so Seth could easily slide back into the FTO program with any number of explanations, despite his past mistakes.
Seth’s run in The Rookie proved compelling as a flawed character and pathological individual. However, now that Seth has seen the result of his actions, it would be even more fascinating if he received the opportunity to turn his life around. Miles and John already forgave Seth and believe him worthy of a second chance, and his actions in “The Thinker” prove he’s worked on fixing lying to protect himself. Seth’s run on the show will always feel incomplete if he never gets the opportunity to fulfill his redemption arc. Hopefully, Seth will get that opportunity later as The Rookie Season 8 continues on ABC.
The Love on the Spectrum cast went through a lot of changes throughout season 4, from engagements to breakups.
During the Netflix show’s new season, which premiered on Wednesday, April 1, viewers checked in on the cast as they offered glimpses into their personal lives. Madison Marilla documented her move to be closer to Tyler White, which came shortly before they got engaged.
“We have not even started [wedding planning] yet. We want to wait until the time is right,” Madison exclusively told Us Weekly about enjoying life as a newly engaged couple. “I know we’re going to do a very big wedding. We will have all our family and friends and cast mates there.”
Madison teased plans to wear “a big ball gown with lots of bling and lots of tulle,” while Tyler promised to be sporting his signature cowboy hat.
Advertisement
“With the logistics of TV, we’ve had to keep the engagement a secret, which made it hard to plan,” he told Us, noting that the “entire” Love on the Spectrum family will be invited to celebrate their big day.
Despite getting engaged, there are some milestones they are saving for after their wedding. The pair revealed to Us they are still living “down the road” from each other.
Netflix
“We’re saving moving in together until we’re married,” Tyler noted, to which Madison replied, “We’re saving all that until marriage.”
While Madison and Taylor prepare to tie the knot, Connor Tomlinsonmade a different decision about his future when he chose to end his romance with Georgie Harris.
“It was my decision to end things. Georgie and I … this season was the longest time we spent with each other,” he told Us. “The more we did, the more we came to realize we’re just two different people. Good people, yes, but not each other’s people.”
Advertisement
He continued: “What she wanted, I couldn’t give her. What I wanted, she couldn’t give me. We both decided it was for the best.”
The exes have remained in touch, with Georgie reaching out for Connor’s birthday. Looking ahead, Connor is excited to meet his person, who he described as “understanding, kind, smart, sophisticated, talented and pretty.”
Thank You!
You have successfully subscribed.
Advertisement
Connor isn’t the only single star on the show — Logan Pereirais still looking for love after briefly finding a connection during season 4.
“I have been thinking about dating after that date,” Logan shared with Us. “I’m looking for somebody that has the same interest as me. Maybe somebody that likes model trains and somebody with really nice hair — even if it’s not curvy or straight. Also somebody that has the same connection with me and likes cheesecake and red velvet cake.”
Love on the Spectrum is currently streaming on Netflix.
Over the course of the 21st century, filmmakers around the world have been treating audiences to some of the greatest, most creative, and most original science fiction movies that the Seventh Art has ever seen. From time travel comedies to dramatic thrillers to massive superhero blockbusters, the 21st century’s greatest sci-fi films are about as close as cinema can possibly come to true perfection.
These films—some of them already considered classics, others guaranteed to achieve that status not too far into the future—display why science fiction has remained one of cinema’s most popular genres since the very beginning of the 20th century, even before cinema was considered an art form or even a storytelling medium. They’re exceptional masterpieces, proof that this is a genre that will never get old.
Advertisement
10
‘Nirvanna the Band the Show the Movie’ (2025)
Matt Johnson and Jay McCarrol in Nirvanna the Band the Show the MovieImage via NEON
Canadia’s national filmography is filled to the brim with excellent, often awfully underappreciated masterpieces. One of the country’s most recent international sensations is the brilliant Nirvanna the Band the Show the Movie, a legacy sequel of the web series Nirvana the Band the Show and the mockumentary sitcom Nirvanna the Band the Show.
Armed with only an RV, a bottle of Orbitz, and a flawless understanding of fair use laws,Matt Johnson and Jay McCarrol created a love letter to Toronto and late-2000s pop culture, a genius parody of Back to the Future, and one of the best sci-fi masterpieces of the last 15 years. Full of man-on-the-street-type moments bound to make anyone and everyone go “how the hell did they pull that off?”,Nirvanna the Band the Show the Movie has already joined the ranks of the greatest Canadian films ever made.
Advertisement
9
‘The Prestige’ (2006)
Cutter (Michael Caine) stands in the wings of a theater, holding a dove perched on one hand in The Prestige.Image via Warner Bros. Pictures
No list of the best sci-fi anything of the 21st century could possibly be complete without at least mentioning Christopher Nolan, a man who has re-defined the genre and constantly set a new standard for all Hollywood blockbusters. Between Batman Begins and The Dark Knight, he made The Prestige, a sci-fi thriller that’s always been hugely acclaimed yet still somehow underrated.
It’s the perfect film for people who love thrillers packed with plot twists. A rousing tale of rivalry and revenge fueled by strong yet subtle steampunk elements, it’s undoubtedly one of Nolan’s greatest works. Christian Bale and Hugh Jackman‘s fantastic performances are the perfect foundation for this character-driven story, made all the more fascinating by one of the strongest endings in its director’s filmography.
Advertisement
8
‘Spider-Man: Across the Spider-Verse’ (2023)
Miles Morales shoots his web in Spider-Man: Across the Spider-Verse (2023)Image via Sony Pictures Releasing
Of course, it doesn’t hurt that the movie has the most impressive and jaw-dropping visuals of any animated film ever made. The excellent sound design and Daniel Pemberton‘s score definitely don’t hurt, either. In fact, almost everything about Across the Spider-Verse is pretty much perfect, making it a must-see for Marvel fans, Spidey fans, and virtually anyone who enjoys a well-made sci-fi film.
Advertisement
7
‘Interstellar’ (2014)
Matthew McConaughey as Joseph Cooper flying a spaceship in InterstellarImage via Paramount Pictures
As if he still had anything to prove in regards to being one of the leading voices of Hollywood sci-fi going into 2014, Christopher Nolandecided to further enshrine himself in that title by making Interstellar. It’s one of the most perfectly-directed sci-fi epics ever made, but the main reason why it works as well as it does is that it is, first and foremost, a character-driven story about a girl and her father.
But though Interstellar is certainly most interested in its characters’ internal conflicts, it’s also a technically impressive epic that leaves nothing much to be desired. The visual effects, the performances, the sound design, the delectably long runtime, the best score of Hans Zimmer‘s career… What more could a diehard fan of sci-fi cinema possibly want from a movie?
Advertisement
6
‘Arrival’ (2016)
Image via Paramount Pictures
Denis Villeneuve was already a well-established filmmaker going into 2016, but the movie that established him as one of the most exciting voices in Hollywood sci-fi was Arrival. This is an alien invasion flick unlike any other, dealing with themes of language, communication, and memory with a deeply emotional story. By the time Arrival cuts to the credits, there won’t be a dry eye in the house.
Villeneuve’s direction is pretty much flawless, which makes it unsurprising that Arrival earned him his first Oscar nomination. It’s also one of the most perfectly-written sci-fi movies ever, with some enthralling character writing and a plot that keeps growing increasingly mind-bending as it goes on. It doesn’t feel like any other alien invasion film in history, and that uniqueness is enough to make it obligatory viewing for fans of the genre.
Advertisement
5
‘Everything Everywhere All At Once’ (2022)
Image via A24
There are Oscar winners that feel like frontrunners in the awards race since months before they even come out; but then, there are others which feel like they come out of the blue and end up sweeping. There’s no contemporary example more perfect than Everything Everywhere All At Once, a quirky and ambitious indie sci-fi action dramedy that ended up winning a whopping seven Academy Awards.
A thrilling and beautifully touching tale about parenthood, love, aging, and everything bagels.
Advertisement
On paper, Everything Everywhere seems like it shouldn’t work. Its thematic breadth is enormous, its sense of humor is undeniably offbeat, and its elements of campy silliness are potent and abundant. But what soon proved to be one of the most chaotic movies of all time also proved to be one of the greatest sci-fi epics of the 21st century, a thrilling and beautifully touching tale about parenthood, love, aging, and everything bagels.
4
‘Children of Men’ (2006)
Clive Owen holding Clare-Hope Ahitey as they walk through a crowd in Children of MenImage via Universal Pictures
Advertisement
Mexican filmmaker Alfonso Cuarón is no stranger to genre cinema, but his strongest genre work happens to be in science fiction. Children of Menis a masterpiece, a dystopian action thriller that unfortunately underperformed at the box office, but has since become a cult classic so huge that it’s arguably more mainstream that it is cult by this point.
It’s one of the most thrilling movie masterpieces of all time, full of impressively shot sequences and permeated by a nail-biting atmosphere of suspense. Bleak though its tone may be, it’s also beautifully hopeful, celebrating faith and humanity’s resilience in the face of a crisis. Excellently performed and strikingly shot by frequent Cuarón collaborator Emmanuel Lubezki, it’s dystopian science fiction at its ver best.
3
‘Mad Max: Fury Road’ (2015)
Image via Warner Bros. Pictures
Advertisement
After three decades away from the action genre and from the Mad Maxfranchise that he revolutionized low-budget Australian cinema with, George Miller made his triumphant return with Mad Max: Fury Road. This wasn’t just a return to form for the filmmaker, nor was it just the best installment in the franchise thus far: We’re talking about one of the most perfect sci-fi action movies of the 21st century.
The over-the-top world-building is a delight, the non-stop adrenaline shots that are all the action sequences (which comprise the vast majority of the film’s relentless runtime) are a blast, and the visuals prove that the sky’s the limit when Miller is given a proper budget. Exciting, emotionally compelling, and packed with some of the most memorable action scenes of the century, Fury Road is one for the cinematic history books.
2
‘Dune: Part Two’ (2024)
Image via Warner Bros. Pictures
Advertisement
For the longest time, it seemed that it was simply impossible to turn Frank Herbert‘s world of Duneinto a film franchise that lived up to the source material’s legacy. Along came Denis Villeneuve and proved that belief embarrassingly wrong. But while the Canadian director’s first Dune is already amazing enough, it’s Dune: Part Twothat smashed every expectation any fan might have had going in.
It’s this generation’s The Empire Strikes Back, a stunning sci-fi franchise epic that expands the scope of its world tremendously and has the guts to conclude with an ending that’s nothing if not dark-toned. Just two years after its release, it can already be considered one of the best sci-fi movies of all time, one with virtually no flaws to talk about. Greig Fraser‘s stunning cinematography, Hans Zimmer’s haunting score, all the amazing performances, the flawless way in which Villeneuve and co-writer Jon Spaihts understand the essence of Herbert’s work, and—of course—Villeneuve’s hugely imaginative direction. There’s basically nothing not to love about this masterpiece.
1
‘Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind’ (2004)
Kate Winslet as Clementine and Jim Carrey as Joel lying on the ice in Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind.Image via Focus Features
Advertisement
By the time 2004 rolled in, Charlie Kaufman had already established himself as the greatest, most intelligent, and most talented screenwriter working in Hollywood. But as if any more proof were needed, he wrote what some may call the single greatest sci-fi screenplay ever written, Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind, directed by Michel Gondry. The result? The most perfect science fiction movie of the 21st century thus far.
Rather than focusing on its sci-fi elements, Eternal Sunshine leverages them as tools to elevate its story about a crumbling relationship and the power of memories. It’s a raw, emotionally powerful, thematically hard-hitting exploration of the very concept of romantic love, concluding with one of the best endings of any sci-fi film from the 2000s. Many great sci-fi movies have been released since, but none quite as exceptional as this 21st-century masterpiece.
Advertisement
Collider Exclusive · Oscar Best Picture Quiz Which Oscar Best Picture Is Your Perfect Movie? Parasite · Everything Everywhere · Oppenheimer · Birdman · No Country
Five Oscar Best Picture winners. Five completely different visions of what cinema can be — and what it can do to you. One of them is the film that was made for the way your mind works. Ten questions will figure out which one.
🪜Parasite
Advertisement
🌀Everything Everywhere
☢️Oppenheimer
🐦Birdman
🪙No Country for Old Men
Advertisement
01
Advertisement
What kind of film experience do you actually want? The best movies don’t just entertain — they leave something behind.
02
Advertisement
Which idea grabs you most in a film? Great films are driven by a central obsession. What’s yours?
03
Advertisement
How do you like your story told? Form is content. The way a story is shaped changes what it means.
04
Advertisement
What makes a truly great antagonist? The opposition defines the protagonist. What kind of opposition fascinates you?
05
Advertisement
What do you want from a film’s ending? The final note is the one that lingers. What do you want it to sound like?
06
Advertisement
Which setting pulls you in most? Where a film takes place shapes everything — mood, stakes, what’s even possible.
07
Advertisement
What cinematic craft impresses you most? Every great film has a signature — a technical or artistic element that makes it unmistakable.
08
Advertisement
What kind of main character do you root for? The protagonist is the lens. Who you choose to follow says something about you.
09
Advertisement
How do you feel about a film that takes its time? Pace is a choice. Some films sprint; others let tension accumulate slowly, deliberately.
10
Advertisement
What do you want to feel walking out of the cinema? The best films leave a mark. What kind of mark do you want?
The Academy Has Decided Your Perfect Film Is…
Advertisement
Your answers have pointed to one Oscar Best Picture winner above all others. This is the film that was made for the way your mind works.
Parasite
Advertisement
You are drawn to films that operate on multiple levels simultaneously — that begin in one genre and quietly, brilliantly migrate into another. Bong Joon-ho’s Parasite is a film about class, desire, and the architecture of inequality that manages to be darkly funny, deeply suspenseful, and genuinely shocking across a single extraordinary running time. Your instinct is for cinema that hides its true intentions until the moment it’s ready to reveal them. Parasite is exactly that — a film that rewards close attention and punishes assumptions, right up to its devastating final image.
Everything Everywhere All at Once
Advertisement
You want it all — and this film gives you all of it. The Daniels’ Everything Everywhere All at Once is one of the most maximalist films ever made: action comedy, multiverse sci-fi, family drama, existential crisis, and a genuinely earned emotional core that sneaks up on you amid the chaos. You are someone who responds to ambition, who doesn’t want cinema to choose between being entertaining and being meaningful. This film refuses that choice entirely. It is overwhelming by design, and its overwhelming nature is precisely the point — because the feeling of being crushed by infinite possibility is exactly what it’s about.
Oppenheimer
Advertisement
You are drawn to cinema on a grand scale — films that understand history not as a backdrop but as a force, and that place their characters inside that force and watch what happens. Christopher Nolan’s Oppenheimer is a film about the terrifying gap between what we can do and what we should do, told with the full weight of one of the most consequential moments in human history behind it. You want your films to feel important without feeling self-important — to earn their ambition through sheer craft and the gravity of their subject. Oppenheimer does exactly that. It is enormous, complicated, and refuses easy comfort.
Birdman
Advertisement
You are drawn to films that foreground their own construction — that make the how of the filmmaking part of the what it’s about. Alejandro González Iñárritu’s Birdman, shot to appear as a single continuous take, is cinema examining itself through the cracked mirror of a fading actor’s ego. You respond to formal daring, to the feeling that a film is doing something that probably shouldn’t be possible. Michael Keaton’s performance and Emmanuel Lubezki’s restless camera create something genuinely unlike anything else — a film that is simultaneously about creativity, relevance, self-destruction, and the impossibility of ever truly knowing if your work means anything at all.
No Country for Old Men
Advertisement
You are drawn to cinema that trusts silence, that refuses to explain itself, and that treats dread as a form of meaning. The Coen Brothers’ No Country for Old Men is a film about the arrival of a new kind of evil — implacable, arbitrary, and utterly indifferent to the moral frameworks we use to make sense of the world. It is one of the most formally controlled films ever made, and its controlled restraint is what makes it so terrifying. You want your films to haunt you, not comfort you. You are not interested in resolution if resolution would be dishonest. No Country for Old Men is honest in a way that most cinema never dares to be.
You must be logged in to post a comment Login