The ITV soap hopes to “challenge the perception of what homelessness looks like”.

The broadcaster has partnered with charities, including The Salvation Army, to develop the plot, which will centre on mechanic Kammy Hadiq, played by Shebz Miah, as it emerges that he’s homeless.

Despite maintaining a job and relationships in the village, fan-favourite Kammy has secretly been sleeping rough in vehicles and in barns.

Emmerdale’s most emotional exits

Emmerdale producer Sophie Roper said: “This storyline is a vital look at ‘hidden homelessness’, showing that people can be living on the edge of society, sleeping in their vehicle or barns, while still successfully holding down a job and maintaining relationships.

“For many reasons, a person’s circumstances can change dramatically and we wanted to challenge the perception of what homelessness looks like and prove that what people present to the outside world isn’t necessarily the whole story.

“We hope this narrative encourages our viewers to look closer and remember that things are not always quite as they seem.”

Emmerdale said it hopes the storyline will raise awareness of the realities of hidden homelessness and that those concealing their struggles often “miss out on the support and help they need”.

This is not the first time the soap has addressed homelessness.

Back in 2019, Emmerdale was praised for Bob Hope’s storyline, which saw the character, played by Tony Audenshaw, sleeping rough after a relationship breakdown.

More recently, the soap worked with the charity Missing People for a plot in which teenager April Windsor, played by Amelia Flanagan, ran away from home during the Christmas season.

Emmerdale airs weeknights at 8pm on ITV1 and STV, and from 7am on ITVX, STV, and YouTube.

What do you think has been the most powerful Emmerdale storyline? Tell us in the comments below.

“I don’t ask why (they rejected the proposal). They just told me, it doesn’t work, because, you know, there are contractual issues, TV rights, and I think everybody wants the last game day, the big celebration, the trophy, that goes to Arsenal, everything together. I think that’s the reason.”

A developing El Nino that is forecast to get quite strong will likely dampen the upcoming Atlantic hurricane season, but it won’t make the potentially deadly storms disappear, federal and outside meteorologists predict.

The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration on Thursday issued its seasonal outlook for the Atlantic, giving a 55% chance of a below-average season. The agency forecasts eight to 14 named storms, with three to six of them becoming strong enough to hit hurricane status and one to three of those intensifying to major hurricanes.

A normal hurricane season has 14 named storms, seven of them becoming hurricanes and three of them reaching major hurricane level, which is more than 110 mph (177 kph).

Eighteen other groups, private and academic, have also forecast what they think the season will be like and most of them also call for a below average summer and fall. Those other forecasts average a dozen named storms, only five becoming hurricanes and two of those being major ones. Those forecasts also call for the Accumulated Cyclone Energy index, which takes into account strength and duration of storms, to be 80% of normal.

Colorado State University, which pioneered the science of hurricane seasonal forecasting in 1984, is predicting the lowest overall activity since 2015, which was the strongest El Nino in the last 75 years. And that forecast is likely to be revised to even lower numbers in June, said Colorado State’s hurricane expert Phil Klotzbach.

This is after nine of the last 10 Atlantic hurricane seasons have been above normal or even hyperactive, Klotzbach said. Last year started slow, but then had a burst, producing a near-record total of three Category 5 hurricanes, including Melissa which devastated Jamaica and Cuba, said Suzana Camargo, a climate scientist and tropical weather expert at Columbia University.

Inflation-adjusted damage across the globe from tropical cyclones has increased from an average of $11.4 billion a year in the 1980s to $109.7 billion a year over the past 10 years, with three-quarters of the damage done in the Atlantic, Gulf of Mexico and Caribbean, according to insurance giant Munich Re.

Hurricanes, typhoons and cyclones are the same weather event, with the different names being used in different parts of the world.

“We should expect a less active year than certainly what we’ve seen recently, and perhaps significantly so below average,” said University at Albany atmospheric scientist Kristen Corbosiero. “But again, it only takes one to cause real devastation and destruction in the mainland U.S. or even in Hawaii.”

El Nino decapitates Atlantic storms

It’s mostly because of “the elephant in the room” which is an El Nino, Camargo said.

An El Nino is the natural and cyclic warming of parts of the central Pacific that warps weather patterns around the globe, especially during winter. Scientists for decades have found a correlation between an El Nino and below average Atlantic hurricane activity and stronger and more storms in the central and eastern Pacific. This year many forecasts are calling for a strong, superstrong or even record setting intense El Nino. During a La Nina, the cool flip side of El Nino, the Atlantic is generally busier with stronger storms.

There’s a 98% chance that there will be an El Nino this summer and an 80% chance it will be moderate or strong, NOAA Administrator Neil Jacobs said Thursday.

Atlantic hurricane seasons when an El Nino reaches strong or very strong status have two-thirds the named storms and half the hurricanes of the 1991-2020 average, according to an Associated Press analysis of storm and El Nino statistics.

El Ninos fight Atlantic storm formation in several ways, especially with cross winds about 1 mile to 7 miles (1.5 to 11 kilometers) above the surface “which can basically blow apart the thunderstorms that make up” a hurricane, Corbosiero said.

“A stronger than normal wind shear tends to tilt storms as they try to develop,” said University at Albany atmospheric scientist Brian Tang. “It pushes dry air into storms. And prevents storms from developing in the first place. And if they do develop, it also prevents them from intensifying.”

El Nino reduces the number and intensity of weaker storms, but once a storm hits hurricane status with 74 mph winds, “they can be kind of like a self-feeding entity” and are less prone to being dampened by El Nino’s wind shear, said Matthew Rosencrans, lead hurricane season forecaster with NOAA’s National Weather Service.

Forecasts for peak hurricane season show strong wind shear from the west in the main development region for the largest and long-lasting hurricanes that come off of Africa and develop as they head west over the Atlantic, Klotzbach said. Fewer of these type storms happen during El Ninos.

In the 15 strongest El Nino years since 1950, 37 named storms, 11 hurricanes and three major hurricanes made landfall on the continental United States, but in the 15 coldest La Nina years 61 named storms, 31 hurricanes and 10 major hurricanes hit America’s Gulf and Atlantic coasts, according to Klotzbach. He said El Nino shrinks the number of hits on the Atlantic coast, but has less of an influence on the number of Gulf coast landfalls.

In addition to El Nino, dry conditions in Africa and water in the Atlantic being only slightly warmer than normal contribute to the forecast of a weaker season, Rosencrans said.

Opposite effect in the Pacific

Advertisement

Advertisement

El Ninos and La Ninas have the opposite effect on storms in the central and eastern Pacific as they do in the Atlantic, so experts are expecting a busier season in those regions. Jacobs said there’s a 70% chance that the eastern Pacific will have an above normal season.

NOAA forecasts 15 to 22 named storms in the Pacific with nine to 14 becoming hurricanes and five to nine of those being major hurricanes. Average is 15 named storms, eight hurricanes and four major hurricanes. Rosencrans said the main area of central Pacific storm development shifts closer to Hawaii during El Ninos.

Eastern Pacific storms near Baja Mexico tend to “go west, affect the fishies and little else,” Corbosiero said. But at times they can turn east or north and cause massive damage as in Hurricane Otis in 2023 that smashed into Mexico, or 1992’s Hurricane Lester, which caused heavy rains in the U.S. Southwest, she said.

Hawaii is a small island chain in a big ocean that can be threatened. In 1992, an El Nino year when there were few Atlantic storms (though Miami was devastated by Hurricane Andrew ), Hawaii was hit by Hurricane Iniki.

The state is preparing for hurricanes just as parts of Hawaii are still reeling from recent back-to-back storms that caused catastrophic flooding, Gov. Josh Green said.

___

Associated Press writer Jennifer Sinco Kelleher in Honolulu contributed to this report.

___

The Associated Press’ climate and environmental coverage receives financial support from multiple private foundations. AP is solely responsible for all content. Find AP’s standards for working with philanthropies, a list of supporters and funded coverage areas at AP.org.

Around one in six adolescents worldwide report having self-harmed at some point in their lives. In England, an NHS mental health survey of 2,370 children and young people found that more than one in three young adults aged 17 to 24 had self-harmed.

Typically, responses to self-harm focus on the individual – diagnosis, treatment and risk management. Mental health support is clearly essential, but a large and growing body of global research points to wider, social factors contributing to self-harm.

Young people across different cultures describe self-harm less as a symptom of a specific “mental illness” and more as a response to unbearable pressures often linked to intense social challenges, relationship difficulties and changes as they develop into adulthood. These issues are raised in India, Pakistan and China.

Even if these social drivers are well acknowledged, there is a lack of alignment between how distress is understood and how it is addressed. This mismatch has real consequences. Responses to youth self-harm that prioritise the individual may reduce immediate danger. However, approaches that prevent distress from arising in the first place and address the wider context that might inadvertently maintain it are also needed.

Social worlds

In research, young people who self-harm often speak of shame and humiliation, family conflict, parental criticism and harsh discipline, social exclusion and overwhelming educational expectations. Some describe feeling unable to express distress or challenge authority safely. Others talk about feeling silenced, believing that if they tried to explain their pain directly, they would not be heard.

In research carried out in Ghana, young people linked self-harm to powerlessness within families, early adult responsibilities and harsh punishment, often framing it as a form of protest or communication. In research in Brazil, adolescents emphasised low family support, school disengagement, and difficulties in expressing their emotions as factors driving self-harming.

Despite differences in culture and context, a consistent pattern emerges. Young people understand self-harm within their everyday social worlds. Distress is described by young people as socially produced and linked to relationships, not simply as something that originates within the individual.

Self-harm becomes a way of regulating overwhelming emotions, expressing protest or making suffering visible when other options feel unavailable.

Research I carried out in Rwanda reinforces this perspective. In interviews with young people, parents and healthcare providers, self-harm was widely understood as emerging from poverty, family conflict, school pressure and community responses, such as stigma and gossip.

Importantly, these explanations were not confined to young people themselves. Across the findings, parents and healthcare professionals also described the young people’s distress as shaped by family relationships, material hardship, and wider social responses. Nevertheless, services across most of the world continue to focus primarily on individual risk assessment and treatment.

School-based programmes, for example, often focus on screening, awareness and referral rather than on reducing the pressures young people describe as driving distress. Clinical services tend to see young people once self-harm has already escalated, by which point social problems may be deeply entrenched. Schools could explore reducing daily pressures linked to risk, including academic pressure, bullying, weak sense of belonging and a lack of trusted adult support, by reviewing assessment load and exam messaging, strengthening connectedness, and improving pastoral support.

Even well-intentioned support may inadvertently reinforce silence if it makes young people feel unable to talk about their feelings and needs. This was particularly clear in our research in Rwanda, where in some cases support was only to communicate that self-harm is dangerous and should be stopped, rather than also recognising it as a signal of unmet needs.

That silence matters because, in my research, lack of emotional support and lack of space for expression were part of the conditions linked to self-harm.

Support for parents is particularly limited, but the need is high. Many parents report significant distress owing to their child’s self-harm, and challenges navigating economic strain, social change and limited support for their young person.

Recognising self-harm as socially structured distress shifts attention upstream. It invites attention on how families respond to conflict and emotion, how schools manage competition and failure, and how communities handle shame and exclusion.

It also highlights the role of wider inequalities in shaping vulnerability, including poverty, expectations placed on young people because of their gender, and limited access to supportive services. This does not deny the importance of mental health care. Young people still need access to compassionate, confidential support.

This perspective is not entirely new. What remains striking is how little it has transformed mainstream policy and practice. As long as self-harm is treated primarily as an individual clinical problem, responses will continue to be limited. There has long been recognition that clinical treatment sits within a broader social ecology. However, integration of this into our intervention approach remains an ongoing project.

Prevention and treatment require environments in which distress can be expressed without fear of punishment or stigma, and where young people have some meaningful say over the conditions shaping their lives.

Some promising work already points in this direction. Participatory approaches that involve young people in designing interventions show higher acceptability and relevance. These might be on a variety of levels, from one-to-one therapy, school support and prevention campaigns, or awareness raising in the community, for example. Community-based programmes that engage families, teachers and peers can help reduce shame and isolation. Interventions grounded in local social realities, rather than “risk models” developed elsewhere that may not fit local contexts, are more likely to resonate with young people’s experiences.

Listening carefully to how young people explain their distress does not offer a quick fix. It does offer a fuller response. If we are serious about reducing youth self-harm, we need to take the social environments shaping young people’s lives seriously, not only as sites of harm, but as places where prevention, treatment and support begin.

Afterwards, William posted a message on social media, saying: “Three years ago, we set out to take a different approach, to think more carefully about how the Duchy could use its land to create opportunity and support people over the long term, including launching a project here in Cornwall to help tackle homelessness with the right support around it.

Prescriptions for two antiparasitic drugs, ivermectin and fenbendazole, have recently surged in the US, according to a new study. Originally developed to treat parasitic worms, the drugs are now being discussed online as possible cancer treatments.

In January 2025, Mel Gibson appeared on the Joe Rogan Experience podcast claiming that ivermectin and fenbendazole can treat cancer. He said the drugs cured three friends of stage 4 cancer. Clips from the interview spread rapidly on social media.

For some listeners, the interview was probably convincing enough for them to try and obtain the drugs for themselves. Prescriptions for ivermectin more than doubled among cancer patients after the podcast appearance. Google searches increased sharply and online forums filled with discussions about self-dosing. Within days, the two drugs were being touted online as possible breakthrough cancer therapies.

But what does the scientific evidence actually show?

First, let’s consider ivermectin, a widely prescribed antiparasitic drug, used in both humans and animals. Laboratory studies have found that it can affect several biological processes linked to cancer growth.

One study found that it may interfere with a pathway that helps cancer cells survive. Other research has explored whether ivermectin can make tumours easier for the immune system to detect and destroy.

However, findings from laboratory studies do not automatically translate into successful treatments for patients. So far, no studies have looked at the effectiveness of ivermectin and fenbendazole in cancer patients, but some early-stage trials are now underway.

Fenbendazole belongs to a group of antiparasitic drugs called benzimidazoles. Unlike ivermectin, it is only used in animals and is not approved for human use.

In laboratory studies, fenbendazole has been shown to interfere with cancer in several ways, including disrupting cancer cells’ uptake of glucose (which these cells rely on heavily), impairing how they manage chemical stress, and damaging their structure so they can no longer function properly.

Public interest in fenbendazole increased in 2019 after a US businessman claimed it helped him recover from lung cancer. However, the story often overlooked an important detail: the patient was also receiving experimental cancer treatment and several other drugs at the same time.

Why scientists remain cautious

This leads to the central issue: the quality of the evidence.

Most evidence supporting ivermectin and fenbendazole as cancer treatments comes from studies in cells or animals, not from clinical trials involving patients.

One paper reporting major improvements in three cancer patients taking fenbendazole was later retracted because of concerns about the reliability of the data.

Some supporters also claim that the two drugs may work better when used together because they appear to affect cancer cells in different ways. However, combination therapy of the two antiparasitic drugs taken together have not been conducted.

Future studies must use a combination of the two drugs to either back up or refute Gibson’s claims. Without scientific evidence, it would be dangerous to assume these drugs are a miracle cancer treatment.

Interest in these drugs has grown quickly, and some human trials testing them (alongside conventional treatments) are now underway. But this doesn’t mean ivermectin has been proven to work against cancer. It simply means researchers believe the laboratory evidence is strong enough to justify further study. Human trials, however, are still at an early stage.

Cancer can leave people searching urgently for hope, especially when treatments are expensive, difficult or uncertain. That helps explain why stories about familiar, low-cost drugs can spread rapidly online.

Until large, well-conducted trials are completed, ivermectin and fenbendazole should be considered experimental cancer treatments. For now, medical experts recommend relying on evidence-based cancer treatments supported by clinical research.

Actors and celebrities at the Cannes Film Festival were coaxed off the Croisette and up the French Riviera coast to Antibes on Thursday for dinner, performances and the annual amfAR Gala auction, which raised millions for AIDS research.

Guests were treated to a lavish reception on the Hotel Du Cap, Eden Roc, lawn, followed by performances from Robbie Williams, Zara Larsson and Lizzo over dinner. The gala was hosted by Geena Davis, who appears on this year’s festival poster, a tribute to “Thelma & Louise.”

Lizzo teased her new album on the red carpet. “I’m just so excited. I’m trying to bring back good, clean fun. Like, I just want to have fun again, people need to dance, people need to laugh.”

Other guests included Rami Malek who has a film in competition in Cannes, Eva Longoria, Heidi Klum, Sofia Carson, Natasha Poly and Bar Refaeli.

An array of art, jewelry and experiences were auctioned.

Actor William Abadie auctioned off a walk-on part in “Emily in Paris” while confirming the sixth season will be the show’s last. After some enthusiastic bidding, two opportunities were given for a turn in the limelight, for 375,000 euros ($435,545) each.

Some of the artwork raised the bar with a famed full set of Andy Warhol screen prints of Marylin Monroe fetching 2.8 million euros ($3,252,228).

Festival sponsor Chopard donated diamond earrings that sold for 600,000 euros ($696,906). And a limited-edition Audemars Piguet watch — one of only five — went for an eye-watering 1,450,000 euros ($1,684,160).

Williams performed a medley of his hits ending with “Angels” dedicated to his daughter. A surprise lot of VIP concert tickets was split between two bidders at 220,000 euros ($255,5278) each for two sets of tickets each.

Larsson closed the dinner with a high-energy performance that lured diners into dancing in front of the stage. The guests then moved to the after-party around the hotel’s pool to dance and celebrate.

Since 1985, amfAR has raised nearly 841 million euros ($950 million) in support of AIDS research and programs and awarded more than 3,800 grants.

According to a new report published by the Rail Accident Investigation Branch (RAIB) the accident happened because the signaller gave permission to the tractor’s driver to use the crossing

An investigation has found that a collision involving a passenger train in Herefordshire happened because a signaller gave a tractor driver permission to use a level crossing when it was not safe.

At around 10:37am on May 22 2025, a passenger train collided with an agricultural trailer being towed across the railway at Nordan Farm user worked crossing, in Herefordshire. The train was travelling on the Down Main line between Ludlow and Leominster at around 80 mph (129 km/h) when the accident occurred.

Police confirmed there were 66 passengers on board the train travelling from Manchester to Cardiff at the time of the collision. Six passengers and one member of staff received minor injuries. The train did not derail, but significant damage was caused to the leading vehicle of the train and to the agricultural trailer.

READ MORE: Question Time debate halted as Fiona Bruce makes two huge announcementsREAD MORE: EastEnders legend bids sad farewell to soap 29 years after debut leaving fans ‘gutted’

The cause of the collision

According to a new report published by the Rail Accident Investigation Branch (RAIB) the accident happened because the signaller gave permission to the tractor’s driver to use the crossing, despite the proximity of the approaching train.

The signaller had forgotten about the presence of the train when they gave permission and did not check signal box equipment which was indicating the presence of the train beforehand, as they had been trained to. The signaller’s actions may have been affected by an interruption to their established routine for giving users permission to use the crossing, an increase in their workload, distraction and the effects of fatigue.

As Nordan Farm level crossing is a passive user worked crossing, it has no engineered safeguards to warn or protect a crossing user of an approaching train and safe operation is solely reliant on the signaller’s decision as to whether it is safe to cross or not.

RAIB found that Network Rail’s level crossing risk assessment process did not effectively recognise nor control the higher risk present at some crossings during intensive seasonal use. This was an underlying factor. RAIB also found that Network Rail did not have a coherent process for deciding whether a vehicle using a user worked crossing should be considered as large, low or slow moving. This was a possible underlying factor.

Recommendations

The RAIB has made two recommendations to Network Rail based on the results of its findings.

The first seeks to improve the effectiveness of risk management processes at crossings that see a high variance of use across the year. The second asks Network Rail to consider the actions it took in response to a previous RAIB recommendation and is aimed at assisting signallers and crossing users in deciding whether a vehicle should be treated as large, low or slow moving.

A spokesperson for Network Rail told the BBC the company was committed to learning from the incident. They said: “Safety remains our highest priority for both passengers and our colleagues, and we have fully supported the independent investigation,” they said.

“Our thoughts remain with everyone affected by this incident. While incidents of this nature are rare, it’s vital we understand exactly what happened and where we can do better. We are carefully considering the report’s findings and recommendations.”

The Mirror has contacted Network Rail for further comment.

Retrospective plans to install the stove in the home in Front Street, Acomb, have been refused by City of York Council planning officers.

The home’s owners stated a broken gas fire that was there when they moved in was not in keeping with the historic building.

But council planning officers ruled the works resulted in the loss of the historic fireplace and timber surrounds and that the new stove was inappropriate.

RECOMMENDED READING:

Refusal comes after the homeowners installed the stove in their lounge, in what was Acomb Manor House which dates to the late 15th or early 16th Century.

The Grade II-listed building features later alterations, including some made at the end of the 19th Century, and was restored in 1987.

Plans from its owners stated there had been no need to create a new fireplace or alter the building as part of the works.

They added a board had been fitted to cover up the messy cavity behind the stove.

The old fireplace in the home in Front Street, Acomb (Image: Andrew Blacklock/City of York Council)

The owners said: “The old fire was a broken cast iron gas fire in a white fire surround.

“Rightly or wrongly, we determined that a wood or log burner would be more in keeping with the property.

“We did consider seeing if there had once been a much larger fireplace as the chimney is of significantly large dimensions, we decided against this so that we didn’t have a major impact on the room or it’s structural and appearance aspects.

“A local company was used who removed the old fireplace, capped the gas supply and removed loose rubble that had just been left behind the old fire.

“The fire was a requirement for the ability to heat the room without resorting to the central heating and to have something that actually worked and was, we thought, in keeping with an older property.”

Council planning officers stated that although the previous fireplace was not original, it dated to the Victorian period so it was part of the building’s historic character.

Officers said: “Whilst not original, the loss is still harmful to the buildings significance.

“The newly installed log burner has resulted in a loss of this character and
harmed the appearance of the heritage asset.

“The log burner and increased opening size is inappropriate and fails to preserve the character of the heritage asset.

“The changes have resulted in less than substantial harm to the listed building.”

The owners have six months to appeal against the council’s decision if they wish.

They were charged with a number of offences including murder, possession of a firearm with intent to cause fear of violence and threats to kill.

Two men have been charged in connection with the death of Nicholas Gordon in east Belfast. The 51-year-old, who was also known as Nicky, died in hospital on Saturday four days after an assault in an apartment complex on the Holywood Road. The men, aged 25 and 31, were arrested in Scotland on Monday on suspicion of murder and were transferred to Northern Ireland. On Thursday, they were charged with a number of offences including murder, possession of a firearm with intent to cause fear of violence and threats to kill. Both are due to appear at Belfast Magistrates’ Court on Friday. A police spokesperson said: “As is normal procedure, all charges are reviewed by the PPS.” A 24-year-old man and a 49-year-old woman previously arrested on suspicion of aggravated burglary with intent to commit grievous bodily harm in the case were released unconditionally.

Get more Daily Record exclusives by signing up for free to Google’s preferred sources. Click HERE