Politics
Photos Of This Body Part Could Help Predict Alzheimer’s Risk
Photos of the back of the eyes could offer a way to predict some of the common risk factors linked to Alzheimer’s disease, which is the leading cause of dementia.
That’s according to a new study, which used AI to analyse retinal photographs from more than 40,000 UK patients.
Alzheimer’s disease is thought to be caused by the abnormal build-up of proteins in and around brain cells. It impacts more than 520,000 people in the UK.
Some of the risk factors for developing the condition include: old age, genetics, history of head injury, smoking, obesity, diabetes, high blood pressure, high cholesterol, hearing loss, untreated depression, loneliness, drinking too much alcohol and not exercising enough.
In the latest study, researchers were able to identify regions of the retina associated with Alzheimer’s risk factors.
Lead author Ruogu Fang, a professor of biomedical engineering at the University of Florida, said most of the existing diagnostic tools for Alzheimer’s disease focus on later in life, “when it is too late to intervene”.
But by looking at retinal health earlier on, “we offer new opportunities to identify patients at risk, offer appropriate tests and encourage them to develop healthy lifestyles to mitigate their risk”, she said.
Retinal photos are a relatively easy and cheap way to assess health
Many patients routinely have pictures of their eyes taken – whether because they have diabetes or glaucoma, or for routine eye examinations.
That means analysing retinal photographs could be a simple and low-cost way to spot Alzheimer’s risks factors compared to more expensive technologies, like MRI scans.
Co-author Seowung Leem, a doctoral student at University of Florida, said with the assistance of AI, they were able to identify subtle retinal variations that were previously overlooked across thousands of subjects – and these variations “may function as reliable indicators of future disease risk”.
Their AI model accurately predicted biological characteristics like sex or blood pressure as well as lifestyle factors associated with developing Alzheimer’s, such as smoking, alcohol use and even insomnia.
While these factors might be captured in patients’ medical charts, researchers noted those records are often incomplete. For example, people might not reliably report alcohol consumption or smoking.
Retinal photographs may provide another, more objective way to detect these risk factors, they said. Plus, they can capture damage accumulated over the years. The findings were published in the Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease.
Prof Fang’s group has already shown how retinal photographs can detect active cases of Alzheimer’s disease.
They suggested identifying early risk factors via retinal photos could better identify patients who might respond to earlier interventions – including protective lifestyle changes, some medications or brain training – before irreversible damage takes place.
Politics
Best Family Location Sharing App: Why HeyPolo Is The Privacy-First Choice
A location-sharing app can be an invaluable tool for families. Whether it’s used by parents to keep an eye on their kids while travelling home from school or to find each other in crowded areas, they can help families feel safe and more in sync.
However, many apps provide constant location sharing that can raise questions about privacy. HeyPolo, on the other hand, offers a considered location sharing solution.
Instead of everyone’s whereabouts being tracked 24/7, its key features can be adjusted to suit the situation and to fit what everyone’s happy with. Whether that means sharing a general area rather than a specific location or sharing a location for a limited period of time, HeyPolo can be adjusted to suit different tracking needs.
This level of flexibility is particularly useful for families thinking to the future, as it leaves room for younger members to become more independent.
So, what is HeyPolo?
HeyPolo provides a variety of location tracking features, from emergency location sharing to everyday location tracking, which can be adjusted to you and your family’s needs and preferences.
Launched by the cybersecurity company Surfshark, which offers a number of online privacy services including VPNs and antivirus software, it’s no surprise that privacy is a defining feature of HeyPolo. While subscribers can feel confident and reassured, the idea is that boundaries won’t be overstepped.
When it comes to downloading the app, HeyPolo is designed to run seamlessly whether you use Android and iOS. Once you’ve signed up for your HeyPolo subscription, it’s free for the rest of your family to join. And there’s a live chat available between 9am to 5pm, so you can get support from a real person.
There’s exact location sharing, and scheduled location sharing. The latter is particularly useful when it comes to keeping tabs on everyone during busy weeks packed with after-school activities and daily morning commutes. You’ll also be able to set up alerts, so you’ll get handy notifications that keep you updated on arrivals, when they’ve left a certain location, or when they’ve updated their privacy settings. Instead of checking their status every 10 minutes, you can get on with your day reassured by the knowledge you won’t miss anything important.
There’s also a very useful speed monitoring feature, so you can receive real-time alerts when your young adult is driving over the speed limit. Plus, the live compass element offers directional navigation which is built into the app’s map interface, so you can find your family members at a festival, shopping centre or amusement park.
Keeping everyone connected, HeyPolo allows you to create groups with your family too, making it easy to stay up to date on everyone’s whereabouts, with all their locations conveniently in one place. Whether it’s a group for friends or family, you’ll be able to add people to the group at any time, and you can remain in a group without sharing your own location if you don’t want to.
Ok, but what makes HeyPolo different?
HeyPolo lets you decide when a location will be tracked, for how long, and by who. This location sharing isn’t set up by one person, but instead needs to be agreed on by everyone. This way, everyone will be happy with the setup, and if they aren’t, the settings can be adjusted. Flexibility is a key perk of the app, something which is especially important for accommodating growing families that want to give children the space and the trust to become more independent.
For instance, HeyPolo allows you to share a location for a couple of hours, rather than 24/7 like some location tracking apps. Similarly, you could also choose to have the approximate location of a family member shared, instead of zooming into the exact location. Locations can be shared in specific emergency situations, with certain people, and for a limited time, so there’s more control allowed there, too.
There’s often concern about what data when using location sharing apps like HeyPolo. For those who are concerned about what happens to their data, HeyPolo doesn’t sell your data to third-party advertisers, and your data is never shared. It’s also worth noting that you won’t see any ads popping up in the app while using it, either.
How much is HeyPolo?
Easy to manage, you’ll just have one HeyPolo subscription and this will cover everyone you invite. This means once you have your subscription set up, it’s free for anyone else to join. If you want to give HeyPolo a try before you commit to a full year, you can opt for the paid monthly subscription, which costs £4.48 per month and renews automatically every month. Or there’s the annual subscription, costing £47.88 for a year, which works out as £3.99 per month.
With a variety of location sharing options to suit different scenarios, the HeyPolo safety app will appeal to families who want to respect privacy, build trust and support kids’ growing independence. To see whether the HeyPolo app is right for your family, sign up for a subscription now.
Politics
Erasing Anything Palestinian: A new Amnesty International report
Amnesty International has published a new investigation. It has accused Israel of carrying out ethnic cleansing against Palestinian Bedouin and herding communities in the occupied West Bank. It claims the occupation’s ethnic cleansing campaign in Area C is “state-sanctioned, state-driven, and state-implemented.”
Settler violence — the goal is ethnic cleansing
The report is titled Erasing Anything Palestinian: Israel’s ethnic cleansing of West Bank Bedouin and herding communities. It documents how entire communities have been driven from their land. This has been carried out through a combination of settler violence, home demolitions, land seizures and settlement expansion. Restrictions on access to water and grazing areas also play an important role in this displacement.
Area C of the occupied West Bank is fully controlled by the Israeli occupation.
Amnesty says the forced displacement of Palestinians in Area C amounts to the war crime of unlawful deportation and transfer, and the crime against humanity of forcible transfer or deportation.
Israeli officials and most of the western media make it seem as though the settler attacks are the actions of a violent fringe operating beyond government control. But Amnesty presents settler violence as a key mechanism for removing Palestinians from strategic areas of the occupied territory.
Palestinian families described repeated raids on their homes and villages, consisting of physical assaults, death threats, theft of livestock and vandalism. Vital infrastructure was also destroyed, and water tanks were smashed. Electricity supplies were cut. Grazing land was fenced off. Many people who fled and later attempted to return found their communities destroyed. Others faced new attacks that forced them out again.
Ethnic cleansing since 1967 but dramatically increased under Netanyahu
The violence and displacement have been ongoing since 1967, but have escalated since December 2022. Netanyahu’s Likud party formed a coalition government with the far-right Jewish Power and Religious Zionism parties. This government openly embraced the settler movement’s vision — the vision of a “Greater Israel” stretching across the occupied Palestinian territories.
In September 2025, finance minister Bezalel Smotrich set out plans to annex more than 80 percent of the West Bank. He said the guiding principle should be “maximum land, minimum Arab population.
While national security minister Itamar Ben-Gvir called for Israeli “sovereignty” across the occupied territories.
Because this is our land, and because we need to tell the whole world: ‘this is ours forever and ever’… Sovereignty, and also encouraging [Palestinian] voluntary emigration, which we should do also in Judea and Samaria.
These words by politicians have been matched by actions on the ground.
Between 2023 and 2025, Israeli occupation authorities advanced plans for more than 50,000 settlement housing units. Nearly 28,000 were approved in 2025 alone, the highest annual figure on record. Across the occupied West Bank, new settler outposts have also appeared at a rate never seen before. By April 2026, more than half of all existing outposts had been established during the current government’s time in office.
Illegal settlements at record rate while Palestinian development blocked
Along with settlement growth comes the rapid development of settler-only infrastructure, including roads and security systems. This continues to isolate Palestinian communities and restricts their movement.
But while settlement expansion continues at unprecedented speed, Palestinian development has effectively been frozen. No Palestinian housing plans were approved in Area C during 2023 and 2024. And only a handful of building permits were issued.
Thousands of demolition orders have been carried out against Palestinian homes, schools, animal shelters and water systems. Between January 2023 and April 2026, Israeli authorities destroyed more than 3,400 Palestinian homes and structures. Almost 3,000 Palestinians were displaced.
The report raises serious questions about the role Israeli occupation authorities play in enabling and protecting the violence. Amnesty documents Israeli occupation soldiers being present during settler attacks. And also being directly involved in incidents of harassment, intimidation or violence against Palestinians. Witnesses described them standing by while settlers assaulted residents, destroyed property and drove shepherds from grazing land. In other cases, “Israeli” soldiers arrived alongside settlers, coordinating with them during the violence.
Without accountability, violence towards Palestinians increases exponentially
Following 7 October 2023, Israeli occupation authorities dramatically expanded firearm licensing and distributed weapons to illegal settlers. Many settlers began wearing military uniforms. It became difficult for Palestinians to know whether the people entering their communities were occupation soldiers or settlers. This has further increased the risks faced by Palestinian communities.
Ein Samia is a Bedouin community in the central occupied West Bank. Residents faced increased intimidation, harassment and violence before leaving the area in 2023. Ayman Suleiman, a Palestinian man displaced from Ein Samia, described to Amnesty how the situation changed.
For almost a year, I didn’t cross the highway [Allon Road]. They [settlers] used to harass me and other shepherds, and we’d try to avoid them, but then the army started showing up and protecting them, shooting in the air.
The report argues that the atmosphere of near total impunity has led to an exponential increase in the violence. Between 2005 and 2025, only three percent of investigations into crimes by these illegal colonists against Palestinians resulted in partial or full convictions. Many Palestinians interviewed said they no longer report attacks because they see little chance of justice. Others told researchers they were the ones questioned, detained or fined after reporting violence carried out against them.
You cannot separate settler violence from political aspirations
Amnesty argues settler violence cannot be separated from the wider political goal of expanding Israeli control across the West Bank. A deliberate campaign is taking place in Area C to permanently reshape the demographic reality of the occupied West Bank. This is, of course, at the expense of the Palestinians who have lived there for generations. The aim is to remove them from their land, to create space for further settlement expansion.
The legal framework which the Israeli occupation uses to govern the West Bank strengthens this system of forced displacement and ethnic cleansing. Since 1967, “Israel” has used military orders to control the lives of Palestinians in the territory, although under international law an occupying power can act only as a temporary administrator. Palestinian lives have been reshaped into tightly controlled enclaves, especially in Area C, where the occupation maintains full control.
A system designed to entrench the Israeli occupation’s dominance
Some Bedouin and herding communities in the occupied West Bank have been emptied, the residents forcibly displaced after sustained attacks and demolitions. Others remain under constant threat, surrounded by expanding illegal settlements and outposts which continue to tighten control over surrounding Palestinian land.
Amnesty’s report argues that there is a deeply entrenched culture of impunity. Even if courts issue rulings in favour of Palestinian residents, including orders allowing displaced families to return to their villages, enforcement often does not take place. The Israeli occupation’s police and military often fail to implement court decisions, leaving families without any meaningful protection or solution.
Amnesty International concludes that the displacement of Palestinians in Area C is part of a structured system of control. This is designed to entrench the Israeli occupation’s dominance over Palestinian land while reducing Palestinian presence. For the Bedouin and herding communities of Area C, this means emptied villages, shrinking grazing land, destroyed livelihoods, and families scattered from the places they have lived for generations.
Featured image via the Canary
By Charlie Jaay
Politics
Survivor hopes to deliver SHAME to Andrew Mountbatten Windsor
A survivor of rape is attempting to return ‘Shame’ to Andrew Mountbatten Windsor. Dolly Sen has carved the word “SHAME” out of wood. She’s then covered it in facts and figures about rape in the UK, as well as quotes from survivors. And she’ll attempt to deliver the art piece to Windsor or to his home in Norfolk.
Sen says:
I am doing this for Virginia, for Gisèle, for myself, and for the 2000 women who be raped this week and the vast majority will have no justice.
Gisèle Pelicot requested a public trial of the more than 50 men who raped her while she was unconscious. She wanted to raise awareness of ‘chemical submission’ and give encouragement to other survivors. Pelicot has now written about her experiences in a book with the subtitle: “Shame has to change sides”.
Before her untimely death, Virginia Giuffre alleged that Ghislaine Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein had groomed her to have sexual encounters with rich and powerful men, including Windsor.
Sen lays out the grim statistics around rape and sexual assault:
- 1 in 4 women have been raped or sexual assaulted.
- Fewer than 3 in 100 rapes in 2024 recorded by police resulted in someone being charged, let alone convicted.
- On average, approximately 10,000 women are sexually assaulted and 2,000 are raped every week in England and Wales.
Windsor may avoid court
Sen also says:
Some say Andrew hasn’t been convicted as a sexual predator or abuser, it is all alleged. This is the problem. It will always be alleged. 1,200 women were abused under Epstein and not a single person has been charged, let alone seen the inside of a court room. I believe Virginia Giuffre. I also believe he will never go to trial because of his status.
What will be interesting is that I may get arrested for this action even though there will be no violence involved. I will probably see a court before Andrew does.
He is a symbol of entrenched privilege and lack of accountability. There is a special gravity for certain bodies – they fall upwards, buoyed by privilege, cushioned by silence. Elsewhere, we are pinned down.
The Epstein files case has become a stark symbol of systemic failure, where survivors’ voices are dismissed and influential abusers evade accountability: the shame belongs not to those who survived abuse.
We are reclaiming our voices, our power, and returning the shame where it belongs: to abusers and the institutions that enable and protect them. My body is no longer the site of shame or apology. It is a site of truth and resistance.
Sen is calling for:
- Transparent investigations and accountability for all perpetrators, regardless of wealth or status.
- Stronger legal protections and support for survivors.
- Greater investment in survivor services, including counselling and legal aid.
- Education campaigns challenging systemic gender inequality and toxic cultures that normalise abuse.
And Sen concludes:
By returning the shame, women are refusing to be silent, reframing the conversation, and forcing society to confront the manufacturers of shame that allow sexual violence to persist.
This is about our right to justice and dignity. We do not get it from the police, the media, or the court system. We are done carrying shame.
Sen is a writer, artist, and activist whose fearless work centres on social justice and challenging institutional abuse and discrimination. Through her public speaking, creative practice, and campaigning, she has consistently amplified the voices of marginalised people.
Some of her previous activism includes Sectioning the DWP and creating Help the Normals, an art piece featureing charity collecting cans. This challenges assumptions about pity, disability, and who society defines as “normal”. Help the Normals is now part of the Wellcome Collection’s Being Human exhibition.
Featured image via the Canary
By The Canary
Politics
The original Reform revolt – spiked
spiked is funded by readers like you. Only 0.1% of regular readers currently support us. If just 1% did, we could grow our team and step up the fight for free speech and democracy.
Become a spiked supporter and enjoy unlimited, ad-free access, bonus content and exclusive events – while helping to keep independent journalism alive.
Politics
Ending Cymru’s international spending and global engagement would cost more than it saves
Campaigners have warned that a motion tabled in the Senedd to end Welsh government spending on international relations would damage Cymru’s reputation as an open, outward-looking nation and weaken its ability to respond to global challenges such as climate change.
Llyr Powell from the Reform UK party has submitted a motion calling for the cessation of all Welsh government international relations spending. Critics have called this a step backwards for a nation that has built its global reputation on partnership, sustainability and solidarity.
The Welsh government’s international relations budget represents a very small proportion of overall public expenditure. It’s around £9.2m in total, of which approximately £1m supports international sustainable development activities. That’s equivalent to roughly 0.003% of total Welsh government spending.
Campaigners argue that despite its modest size, the budget delivers disproportionate value. They point as a clear example to the Mbale tree-planting initiative in Uganda, which plants a tree for every child born in Cymru.
The scheme has already sequestered an estimated 1.4m tonnes of carbon dioxide, equivalent to around a quarter of Cymru’s annual transport emissions. It also supports local livelihoods, reduces landslide risk and strengthens climate resilience in vulnerable communities.
Cymru’s place in the world
A spokesperson from Global Climate Justice Cymru said:
We regret Reform UK’s isolationist approach to Cymru’s place in the world.
At a time when climate change, economic inequality and conflict are global challenges that do not respect borders, turning inward and cutting off the partnerships that help us respond to them is not strength, it is retreat.
Cymru cannot insulate itself from the world by pretending it isn’t part of it.
The warning echoes the UK government’s own National Security Risk Assessment, which identifies biodiversity loss and ecosystem collapse as top-tier threats to national security, economic stability and public wellbeing.
Environmental degradation, including deforestation in critical ecosystems like the Amazon, is linked to food insecurity, rising prices, instability and displacement worldwide.
The campaign also pointed to the Well-being of Future Generations (Wales) Act. This requires Cymru to consider its contribution to global well-being as part of its approach to domestic policy. It’s not an optional extra, but a defining feature of how the nation is governed.
A spokesperson from Wales Overseas Agency Group said:
Cymru’s reputation as an outward-looking, internationally engaged nation has been hard-won. It reflects decades of leadership on sustainable development and global solidarity.
Cutting this funding would not save meaningful sums but it would send a damaging signal that Cymru is turning its back on the world.
Campaigners stressed that the costs involved are negligible in the context of overall public spending. The £1m sustainable development budget is equivalent to roughly 40 minutes of health spending in Cymru. While the entire international relations budget would barely cover six hours of healthcare spending.
They argue the real impact of cutting it would be reputational and economic. Around £8m of the budget supports international economic and cultural links. These are increasingly vital in the post-Brexit context, where Welsh exporters face new trade barriers, regulatory complexity and delays.
Campaigners are calling on Members of the Senedd to oppose the motion when it comes to a vote, and instead to recommit to Cymru’s role as a globally responsible, engaged and forward-looking nation working in partnership with others to advance shared prosperity, climate action and social justice.
Featured image via the Canary
By The Canary
Politics
Trump Admits His War In Iran Could Have Caused ‘Economic Catastrophe’
Donald Trump has admitted the US-Israel war in Iran could have caused “economic catastrophe” while talking up his new deal with Tehran.
Speaking at a G7 press conference from France, the US president said: “I didn’t want to see economic catastrophe. If you kept this going, that could have happened.”
He added that the stock market is “more brilliant than anybody there is… other than me.”
The US and Iran have agreed to sign a deal to end their conflict although details of any such agreement are yet to be released.
It comes after Trump joined Israel’s prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu in bombing Tehran in February.
Iran retaliated by effectively closing a major shipping lane, the Strait of Hormuz, which hit around a fifth of global oil supplies and rocked the global market.
Trump also claimed Iran’s new group of leaders are “very smart” and “far less radicalised”.
He said: “I think they’re going to behave much differently. I think they see a different way of life that they were never exposed to.”
American and Israeli bombs have killed multiple senior officials including supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei over the last four months.
The White House also promised regime change in Iran after widespread public protests.
However the Islamic Republic is still very much in charge and the new supreme leader, Mojtaba Khamenei, is the son of his predecessor.
Despite concerns that Iran could still squeeze the Strait of Hormuz whenever it wants, Trump also issued fresh threats to renew the conflict.
He said: “If [a new peace agreement] doesn’t get done in 60 days, it’s all right – we go back to bombing.
“I don’t want to do that, because it’s so good. But we might have to, because we’re never going to let them have a nuclear weapon.
“But they’ve agreed not to, and you’ll see that very clearly in the agreement.”
Listen to Commons People, the podcast that makes politics easy. Every week, Kevin Schofield and Kate Nicholson unpack the week’s biggest stories to keep you informed. Join us for straightforward analysis of what’s going on at Westminster.
Politics
Burnham snubs Starmer’s desperate job offer
On Wednesday 17 June, Starmer said he would like to give Andy Burnham a “big role” in government should he win the Makerfield by-election. The question was this: would Burnham accept a job in the most unpopular government of his lifetime, or would he simply force Starmer out and take the top job for himself?
The answer was obvious, and we didn’t have to wait long to hear it:
Senior Labour source: “The benefit Andy has is the wind of change for not having been associated with the Government’s failings” — Politics UK (@PolitlcsUK) June 17, 2026
NEW: Andy Burnham won’t accept a job in Keir Starmer’s Government
Burnham says no thanks
Starmer offered Andy B a job in an interview with Beth Rigby:
In a deeply personal interview, the PM tells me:
— Beth Rigby (@BethRigby) June 17, 2026
He wants Andy Burnham back in cabinet – to “have a big role in government”
He says he will talk to Burnham “after the weekend”
“I don't feel angry. I don't feel bitter” Starmer says, on the leadership crisis he’s facing… pic.twitter.com/WGjNoMkX9K
He probably should have saved himself the embarrassment by offering Burnham the job directly. Saying that, if Starmer cared about embarrassment, he wouldn’t do half the things he does.
According to the Manchester Evening News (MEN), a “senior source” in Team Burnham said:
the benefit Andy has is the wind of change for not having been associated with the Government’s failings.
In other words, the man doesn’t want to get Starmer’s stink on himself. And this is all reminiscent of when David Cameron offered Boris Johnson a ‘top five’ position to not campaign for Brexit. And much like Johnson, Andy B is also a regional mayor with a massive barnet.
The MEN also reported:
The source also told us that the discussion of the Greater Manchester mayoral elections was an attempt to put ‘further challenges up’ and that if Keir Starmer stays it will give people ‘an excuse to vote against Labour’ in that election. If Mr Burnham wins the Greater Manchester Mayoral election is expected to take place at the end of July.
And this was in response to Starmer’s other attempt to wriggle out of a leadership challenge.
Focus
Slippery Starmer also said the following:
We’ve got the by-election tomorrow. First and foremost, I want Andy Burnham to win, and that’s why I’ve encouraged activists and members to go up there during the course of the campaign, and they’ll be up there tomorrow helping to get the vote out.
Then what happens is we’re immediately tipped into a Manchester mayoral contest by-election, one of the biggest by-elections that we’ve ever fought, because of the scale of it. And it’s really important to my mind that the whole of the Labour Party and Labour movement focuses on that, which is the next most immediate task.
So here’s the thing; the biggest obstacle to Labour winning any election seems to be Keir Starmer leading the party. As such, this argument doesn’t really hold up. It is a string of sentences, though, and the man does have to act like he’s not just a placeholder prime minister.
Change?
We should add that Burnham’s offering right now isn’t all that different to Starmer’s:
- Burnham ‘to support’ Mahmood’s racist immigration changes.
- Burnham is silent on wealth taxes – not a promising sign from potential PM.
- Andy Burnham’s role with Iain Duncan Smith’s think tank just shows he’s more of the same.
- Burnham WON’T back proportional representation this parliament.
- Shapeshifting Burnham ditches trans rights to panic-grab Reform votes.
- Burnham slammed for saying he won’t renationalise Thames Water.
- Burnham calls for ‘safe routes’ then agrees with Farage in muddled interview.
- Green candidate calls out genocide as Burnham sits on fence.
- Andy U-Turnham has already abandoned the Waspi women.
While some of this may change when Burnham is actually PM, that doesn’t mean he’ll get better!
Featured image via The Canary
By Willem Moore
Politics
UK’s formal military collaboration with Israel continued throughout Gaza genocide
A parliamentary question by a Muslim Labour MP has revealed UK military collaboration with the Israeli occupation forces (IOF) continued unbroken through genocide and numerous illegal attacks.
Apsana Begum asked Starmer’s ministry of defence:
whether the agreement signed in December 2020 by the Chief of the Defence Staff and his Israeli counterpart formalising military collaboration between the UK and Israel remains in place; and whether it has been (a) reviewed, (b) modified and (c) amended.
The curt answer was provided by Israel-supporting defence minister Luke Pollard, who confirmed that military agreement with Israel has been in place unamended:
The UK-Israel military cooperation agreement, which was signed in December 2020, remains extant.
A litany of shame
Since the beginning of Israel’s genocide in Gaza in October 2023, the IOF has slaughtered hundreds of thousands of civilians in Gaza and is starving more than a million. It has committed murder, ethnic cleansing and hundreds of abductions in the occupied West Bank. It has committed terrorist attacks in Lebanon and Qatar, murdered thousands in Lebanon, Iran, and Syria and illegally invaded and ethnically cleansed large areas of Lebanon and Syria.
And Pollard’s brusque ‘extant’ is masking the real extent of the UK’s extensive, direct collaboration in Israel’s crimes. It has provided aerial surveillance during the murder of aid workers – including British citizens – along with tens of thousands of children, hundreds of journalists and thousands of medics and rescue workers.
The Starmer government is a genocide regime providing direct military support as well as legislative and political cover to the terror colony. All confirmed in a ministerial response – as if more confirmation were needed.
Featured image via the Canary
By Skwawkbox
Politics
Jordan Stephens returns to Brighton for event exploring pressures facing young men
Amnesty International UK is launching a new live event series in Brighton on 25 June with musician, writer and mental health advocate Jordan Stephens.
He’ll be leading a conversation about the pressures facing young men today and how stronger communities can help create positive change.
Change The Record: In Conversation with Jordan Stephens takes place on Thursday 25 June at The Old Market in Hove. It’ll bring together Stephens and a panel of guests for an honest discussion about wellbeing, identity, belonging and the social and economic challenges shaping the lives of young men.
Stephens is best known as one half of chart-topping duo Rizzle Kicks. He grew up in Brighton after moving to the city as a child. And he attended a local youth club closely connected to The Old Market.
Ben Hurst, director of facilitation at Beyond Equality, will host the event. It’ll also feature youth sector leader Adam Muirhead and Yunus El-Asri, founder of Young Muslims in Politics.
Together they’ll explore the impact of loneliness, online influences, economic insecurity and shrinking community spaces. And they’ll discuss how young men can play a positive role in building happier, healthier and fairer communities.
The evening marks the beginning of a new Amnesty initiative creating space for young men to come together, challenge division and explore the social and economic pressures shaping their lives – from insecure work and housing to cuts to youth services and community support.
Jordan Stephens – ‘all men are feeling it’
Stephens said:
There’s a lot being said about young men right now, and much of it feels negative, polarised or stuck. This conversation is about honesty, connection and figuring out how men and boys can show up differently for ourselves, each other, and our communities.
Not all men are the problem, but all men are feeling it – the algorithms pushing division, the isolation, the daily grind of economic pressure. It’s important to come together to reflect and work out what we can do to make our communities happier, healthier and fairer for everyone.
Audiences will also hear more about Amnesty’s developing work with young men. And there’ll be opportunities to get involved locally following the discussion.
After the event, attendees are invited to continue conversations informally at the venue bar with organisers, guests and community groups.
Stephens is an artist, actor and author whose memoir Avoidance, Drugs, Heartbreak & Dogs became a Sunday Times bestseller. Alongside his music career with Rizzle Kicks, Stephens has become a leading voice on masculinity and mental health. He recently fronted Channel 4 documentary Hunting My Sextortion Scammer and is co-host of the podcast Miss Me?.
Ben Hurst is director of facilitation at Beyond Equality. The organisation works with men and boys to help create safer and more equitable communities. Over the past decade, Beyond Equality has facilitated conversations with young people, educators, organisations and community groups across the UK and beyond.
Change The Record is Amnesty International UK’s platform for musicians, artists and the wider creative industry to champion and protect human rights. The initiative brings together artists, fans and cultural leaders to resist division and use creativity as a force for freedom and social change.
Event Information
Change The Record: In Conversation with Jordan Stephens, 8pm-9.45pm, Thursday 25 June 2026.
The Old Market, 11A Upper Market Street, Brighton and Hove, BN3 1AS.
Featured image via the Canary
By The Canary
Politics
Trump Drops Profanity About Obama During Iran Deal Meltdown
President Donald Trump on Wednesday flipped out when talking about former President Barack Obama’s Iran deal as he flailed when trying to boost his yet-to-be-finalized agreement with Tehran.
Trump raged about his predecessor as he spoke to reporters during the last day of the G7 summit in France, with the draft US-Iran deal — which is scheduled to be officially signed Friday in Switzerland — looming large.
The president has repeatedly attempted to flex about his agreement in comparison to the Obama-era deal, even though few details have been publicly released about Trump’s memorandum of understanding.
CNN and Bloomberg News have released a copy of the deal’s text.
On Wednesday, Trump railed about Obama giving Iran “$1.7 billion in cash” — a familiar attack — in reference to the 2015 deal that was designed to prevent Iran from acquiring a nuclear weapon.
Trump withdrew from that deal — known as the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action — during his first term in office.
Under the Obama program, Iran was granted significant sanctions relief, amounting to billions of dollars, in exchange for limits on uranium enrichment and other restrictions.
By contrast, Trump’s deal is said to include an investment in a $300 billion reconstruction fund for Iran — though where the money is coming from is contested by the Trump administration.
Regardless of the detail, Trump dropped an expletive when holding forth on how he saw both deals.
“And you know what the Iranians did? They laughed at Obama, and they said he’s a stupid son of a bitch,” Trump said, without evidence, before wrapping up the briefing.
Earlier, Trump described the memorandum of understanding as a “very strong deal,” while warning that Tehran would face dire consequences if he doesn’t like the final text of the deal.
“No, it’s not final. It’s a memorandum of understanding, and if I don’t like it, we’ll go back to shooting at ’em, dropping bombs on their head,” the president said. “If I don’t like it, if they don’t behave, we’ll go right back to dropping bombs right smack in the middle of their head.”
Trump also disputed suggestions that the US is part of the $300 billion reconstruction fund.
“We’re not investing, we’re not putting up 10 cents,” he said.
Listen to Commons People, the podcast that makes politics easy. Every week, Kevin Schofield and Kate Nicholson unpack the week’s biggest stories to keep you informed. Join us for straightforward analysis of what’s going on at Westminster.
-
Business3 days agoNo Jackpot Winner as $257 Million Prize Rolls Over to $269 Million Monday Draw
-
Crypto World6 days agoOppenheimer backs SpaceX as $70 billion retail frenzy builds
-
Fashion5 days agoWeekend Open Thread: Tuckernuck – Corporette.com
-
Crypto World6 days agoMarkets Rally as SpaceX IPO Looms Amid Iran Tensions and Inflation Surge
-
Crypto World3 days agoZimbabwe Requires Crypto Businesses to Register Annually Under New FIU Regulations
-
Tech5 days agoNanoClaw integrates JFrog registries to secure AI agent downloads
-
Crypto World4 days agoBitget enters Argentina’s regulated crypto market through PSAV registration
-
Tech5 days agoThis Week In Security: Microsoft On Microsoft, Register Your Domains, Linux On ARM, And FreeBSD Joins The File Cache Club
-
Tech6 days ago
Dutton Ranch star claims they ‘didn’t see any disruption’ on set following Chad Feehan’s exit from Yellowstone spinoff fueled by Taylor Sheridan clash rumors
-
NewsBeat6 days agoEl Nino has formed in the Pacific and could set records, forecasters say
-
Politics6 days agoPolitics Home | Healey Resignation Is “Colossal Failure Of Government”, Says Former Labour Defence Secretary
-
Entertainment6 days agoDonnie Wahlberg & More Heat Up Las Vegas at Circa’s Barry’s Downtown Prime
-
Tech6 days agoOpendoor Ends India Operations, Fueling a Bigger Conversation About AI and Outsourcing
-
Politics6 days agoBelfast burns, while Met chief points finger at Iran and Russia
-
Sports6 days agoFirst Time Since 1971: Australia Register Historic Low In ODI Cricket
-
NewsBeat5 days agoFBI searches office of Ohio voter registration group
-
Business6 days agoAT&T: Verizon's 27% Outperformance Sets Up A Solid Entry Point
-
Tech6 days agoAnthropic is spending $150M to embed 1,000 AI fellows inside nonprofits. No degree required.
-
Politics6 days agoModi thanks Trump for wishes as US attacks Indian seafarers
-
Entertainment6 days ago‘The Pitt’s Fan-Favorite Doctor Confirms Noah Wyle Gave His Blessing to Return [Exclusive]




You must be logged in to post a comment Login