Strands is the NYT’s latest word game after the likes of Wordle, Spelling Bee and Connections – and it’s great fun. It can be difficult, though, so read on for my Strands hints.

Want more word-based fun? Then check out my NYT Connections today and Quordle today pages for hints and answers for those games, and Marc’s Wordle today page for the original viral word game.

Schiit Audio has spent the better part of a decade owning the $99 conversation in hi-fi, but until now, it refused to follow the herd into the dongle DAC trenches. That changes with the surprise debut of the Schiit Vestri at CanJam Singapore 2026, a compact USB DAC and headphone amp that finally gives long suffering fans what they’ve been asking for since the first smartphone killed the headphone jack. Took them long enough. Thor waited less time for Ragnarök.

Priced at $99, Vestri is not just another “me too” stick. It is Schiit doing what it does best, dropping into a crowded category late, undercutting expectations, and daring everyone else to explain their pricing. No screen, no nonsense, just a stealth LED interface beneath the surface, simple controls, and both 3.5mm and 4.4mm outputs for those who have already gone balanced and are not going back.

Schiit Vestri: $99 Dongle DAC, Balanced Output, No Screen, Maximum Attitude

Schiit Audio has officially entered the dongle DAC and portable headphone amp category with Vestri, a $99 USB powered DAC and headphone amplifier that debuted at CanJam Singapore. Pre-orders are open now, with shipments scheduled to begin May 28.

Vestri includes both 4.4mm balanced and 3.5mm single ended headphone outputs, capacitive touch controls, Schiit’s Unison USB receiver, and the company’s Mesh D/A conversion platform, which combines a time and frequency domain optimized digital filter with an ES9018 delta sigma DAC.

“I joke when I say ‘Vestri is the only dongle that matters,” explained Jason Stoddard, Schiit’s Co-Founder. “Which is beyond cheeky, but in a field of 10,000 lookalike products all using the same off the shelf technology, it has a grain of truth.”

The balanced output delivers up to 400mW RMS into 32 ohms, 320mW into 50 ohms, and 120mW into 300 ohms. The single ended output provides up to 200mW RMS into 32 ohms, 150mW into 50 ohms, and 40mW into 300 ohms. That should make Vestri suitable for a very wide range of headphones and IEMs, although the absolute hardest to drive models will still want something larger and less pocket friendly — so it’s clearly not the only dongle that matters.

The design is classic Schiit mischief with actual engineering behind it. Vestri uses a seamless milled aluminum chassis with a glass front panel, but skips the OLED screen found on many portable DACs.

“No screens,” Stoddard said. “Screens burn in and are a wear item. We want to design for the next generation, not the next sale.”

Instead, Vestri uses individual LEDs embedded beneath the glass for its interface. Schiit says they are run conservatively for long life.

“It’s the eternal screen,” Stoddard joked. “If you don’t drop it in the sand or in your coffee, Vestri should last far past its warranty.” Duly noted. Not IPX7 rated apparently.

Controls include volume, Loudness, invert, and NOS modes, all accessible through capacitive touch buttons under the glass. Loudness contour is a useful feature at lower listening levels, while NOS mode gives users another playback option without turning the product into a settings circus.

Vestri is also made in the USA on Schiit Audio’s own SMD assembly line in Corpus Christi, Texas.

“We’ve been making products in the USA since we started in a garage 16 years ago,” Stoddard said. “No need to change anything for Vestri.”

Schiit Vestri Key Specs:

• USB receiver: Schiit Unison USB
• D/A conversion: Schiit Mesh with ES9018 delta sigma DAC
• Supported formats: 16-bit/44.1 kHz to 32-bit/192 kHz
• Outputs: 4.4mm balanced and 3.5mm single ended
• Power output: up to 400mW RMS balanced, 200mW RMS single ended into 32 ohms
• Frequency response: 20Hz to 20kHz, ±0.05dB
• THD: less than 0.0002%, 20Hz to 20kHz
• SNR: greater than 118dB, A weighted
• Output impedance: less than 0.5 ohms
• Controls: volume, NOS, invert, Loudness
• Display: no OLED screen, embedded LEDs under glass
• Chassis: milled aluminum with glass front
• Power: USB powered, 0.9W typical
• Size: 2.4 x 1.4 x 0.44 inches
• Weight: 4 oz
• Made in: USA, Corpus Christi, Texas
• Warranty: 2 years

The Bottom Line

At $99, Vestri lands in one of the most crowded categories in portable audio, but the combination of balanced output, Unison USB, Mesh conversion, touch controls, no screen, two year warranty, and USA manufacturing gives Schiit a very real point of difference. Sneaky Schiit, indeed.

What makes Vestri stand out is not just the price, it is the refusal to follow the usual template. No off the shelf reference design, no fragile OLED screen, and no anonymous tuning. Instead, Schiit leans on its own USB implementation, its own digital filter approach, and a balanced output stage that actually delivers meaningful power for a dongle at this price. The Loudness control is also a smart inclusion that most competitors ignore, especially for real world listening on the move.

What is missing is just as important. There is no app, no Bluetooth, no wireless anything, and no high resolution streaming integration. Codec chasing is not part of the story here. If you want LDAC, aptX Lossless, or a feature heavy interface, you will have to look elsewhere. Some users will also question the lack of a screen, even if Schiit makes a valid long term durability argument.

Do you know what could make the Vestri even more interesting? Running the 3.5mm output with a 3.5mm to RCA cable into the new Schiit Buf Tube Buffer, and then into a pair of active loudspeakers. Use your smartphone as your network player and insert some “warmth” into the speakers if they need it.

The competition is fierce and not exactly forgiving. Dongles from brands like FiiO, iFi Audio, Questyle, Shanling, and Hidizs dominate this space with feature rich designs, app support, and a wide range of DAC implementations. Many offer more bells and whistles, but few will match Vestri’s combination of balanced power, in house engineering, and made in USA production at this price.

This is for listeners who want a simple, durable, plug and play DAC and headphone amp that focuses on sound and power over features. If Schiit delivers on performance, Vestri is going to be a problem for a lot of very comfortable competitors.

Where to buy: $99 at Schiit.com (available May 28, 2026)

Related Reading:

Google is betting that the future of productivity software starts with your voice, not your keyboard. At its I/O 2026 developer conference on Monday, the company unveiled voice-based prompting features for Docs, Keep, and Gmail, all powered by its Gemini AI models.

The headline feature is Docs Live, which lets users create and edit documents entirely by speaking. In a demo, Google showed a user verbally instructing the tool to pull résumé details from Drive, layer in event logistics from an email thread, and sprinkle in a few humorous anecdotes, all in a single, unscripted stream of speech. The idea is that voice enables longer, more complex prompts than most people would bother typing out, and that current models are now good enough to follow along even when a speaker changes direction mid-sentence.

The 💜 of EU tech

The latest rumblings from the EU tech scene, a story from our wise ol’ founder Boris, and some questionable AI art. It’s free, every week, in your inbox. Sign up now!

Advertisement

CEO Sundar Pichai framed the shift as inevitable, saying that users will soon create and edit documents using voice as a matter of course. It is a bold claim, but the technical groundwork is arguably already in place. Google recently launched a standalone dictation product called Rambler, built into its Gboard keyboard, which strips filler words and handles multilingual code-switching on the fly. Rambler shipped earlier this month for Samsung Galaxy and Google Pixel devices.

Keep is getting a similar voice overhaul. Users will be able to dump a stream of unstructured thoughts, jumping from gift ideas to grocery lists to home renovation plans, and the AI will sort the transcription into separate, neatly organised notes. The concept is not new. Apps such as Voicenotes and AudioPen have offered voice-to-structured-text workflows for years, and desktop dictation tools like Wispr Flow, Monologue, and Aqua Voice have built loyal followings. What Google brings to the table is scale: Keep is already baked into the broader Workspace ecosystem, meaning voice notes can flow straight into Docs, Sheets, and the rest of the suite.

Gmail, meanwhile, is gaining what Google calls Gmail Live, a conversational voice interface for your inbox. Instead of typing search queries, you can ask Gmail to surface specific details, flight confirmation codes, Airbnb check-in instructions, or your child’s school schedule, and get spoken answers drawn from your messages. It is essentially an AI agent for your email, one that understands context well enough to handle multi-step requests.

The broader trend here is clear. Users are asking increasingly complex, multi-part questions of AI tools, and voice is simply a more natural interface for that kind of interaction than a text box. Google is not the only company to notice. Its own Cloud Next conference last month showcased a wave of agentic AI features across Workspace, and rivals from OpenAI to Apple are racing to embed voice-first AI into their own productivity stacks.

The new voice features will roll out this summer for Google AI Premium subscribers and Google Workspace business users. Whether talking to your documents catches on as a mainstream habit remains to be seen, but Google is clearly convinced that the keyboard’s monopoly on productivity is overdue for a challenge.

Long journeys highlight how quickly your phone can drain, with all those maps, images, and texts eating away at the battery like there’s no tomorrow. The INIU power bank, priced at $19.79 after coupon is automatically applied at checkout (was $33), comes to the rescue, packing 20,000mAh into a body measuring 2.8 x 4.1 x 1.2 inches and weighing only 11.1 ounces. Tuck it into a jacket pocket or side compartment, and it will sit quietly until you need it.

Its high-density cells are capable of packing a lot of power into such a small footprint without losing output quality. In general, a full charge will last your iPhone 16 up to four complete recharges or your Galaxy S23 up to three, but in practice, it all depends on screen brightness, apps, and so on, so don’t be surprised if it lasts you a full day of mixed stuff before needing a top-up.

LEGO – Speed Champions Ferrari 812 Competizione 76914

• Iconic LEGO Collection – The LEGO Speed Champions collection is full of iconic toy car models, including the Pagani Utopia (76915) and Porsche…
• LEGO Ferrari Collectible – Features a LEGO Speed Champions collectible model car replica of the Ferrari 812 Competizione plus a driver minifigure with…
• Race Driver Minifigure – The set includes a LEGO race driver minifigure to be placed behind the wheel of the race car toy for superfast action on the…

Recharging is a continuous 22.5 watts using PD & QC protocols so your phone charges up faster than with typical banks, which is good. One end is lined with three ports, two USB-C and one USB-A. Two or three devices can share the load, consuming up to 15 watts total. The bank also includes a short braided USB-C cable with a wrist band, eliminating the need to rummage through your luggage for extra cords or get held up at security.

Rather than an ambiguous battery indicator, the front boasts a handy LED display that shows you exactly what percentage is remaining. That way, you can quickly assess whether it will withstand another gadget or if it requires some TLC on its own. Recharging the bank takes about six hours with a regular wall adapter, which is quite fair. The 74-watt-hour rating is airline certified, so there’s no need for any further paperwork.

Hikers and festival-goers appreciate the built-in torch for late-night trips to the restroom or getting to your car in a parking lot. The outside case is durable enough for daily use, and the entire thing stays cool even when left on for extended periods of time.

• Pennsylvania residents revolt against expanding hyperscale data center infrastructure projects statewide
• Utility protections failed to calm growing public anger over development impacts
• Former supporters of Governor Shapiro openly threatened political retaliation during heated public meetings

A furious backlash against data center expansion in the state has placed Pennsylvania Governor Josh Shapiro directly in the crosshairs of his own constituents.

During a tense recent two-hour town hall, roughly 20 speakers systematically dismantled the administration’s approach to infrastructure development.

An anonymous reader quotes a report from Inside Climate News: A proposed merger of the largest utility in the country by market value, NextEra Energy, with the sixth-largest, Dominion, would create a megacompany at a time when data centers and rapid increases in electricity demand are reshaping the industry. The proposal, announced Monday morning and contingent on state and federal regulatory approval, would result in a company that leads in nearly every aspect of the US power and utility industry, including overall electricity generation, natural gas generation, and renewables. The $67 billion deal combines NextEra’s size and reach with Dominion’s positioning as the local utility for the world’s largest concentration of data centers in northern Virginia. But the results are likely bad for consumers and the environment, creating a company with enormous financial and political strength that will be difficult to effectively regulate, according to consumer advocates and analysts.

For perspective, only Exxon Mobil and Chevron would be larger based on market value among US-based energy companies. “Mergers are not about consumers; they’re about shareholders,” said Ari Peskoe, director of the Electricity Law Initiative at Harvard Law School. “For the Dominion shareholders, they are selling their shares at a premium. The executives are getting massive payouts for facilitating this, assuming it all goes through, and obviously NextEra believes the transaction is going to add value to the company. Ratepayers are all an afterthought.” The deal makes financial sense for both companies, said Andrew Bischof, an equity analyst for Morningstar. “We view the transaction as allowing NextEra to accelerate its data center ambitions, which had trailed those of its regulated peers, by using Dominion’s expertise and relationships to expedite NextEra’s data center hub plans,” he said in a note to clients.

NextEra, based in Juno Beach, Florida, includes Florida Power & Light, the largest regulated electricity utility in the state, and NextEra Energy Resources, a wholesale electricity supplier that owns power plants across the nation. Dominion, based in Richmond, Virginia, includes regulated utilities serving much of Virginia, parts of North Carolina and South Carolina, and other assets across the country. The company would be called NextEra Energy, and NextEra CEO John W. Ketchum would serve in the same role after the deal closes. Robert M. Blue, Dominion’s CEO, would be the CEO for regulated utilities for the merged company. The parties said they expect regulatory approvals to take 12 to 18 months. NextEra shareholders would own 74.5 percent and Dominion shareholders would own 25.5 percent, respectively, of the combined company in the all-stock transaction. “We are bringing NextEra Energy and Dominion Energy together because scale matters more than ever — not for the sake of size, but because scale translates into capital and operating efficiencies,” Ketchum said in a statement.

Although the companies claim the deal would produce savings, including $2.25 billion in Dominion customer bill credits, former regulator Marissa Paslick Gillett said she was “flabbergasted by the tone deafness,” arguing that major utility mergers rarely deliver the promised “synergies” and often create “a behemoth” that is harder to regulate.

Others warned that a larger NextEra could use its political power “to the disadvantage of ratepayers,” while climate advocates said expanding methane gas plants to serve data centers would worsen pollution and leave vulnerable communities “at the short end of the stick.”

from the oh-so-now-you’re-concerned? dept

A couple weeks back, Supreme Court watcher Steve Vladeck pointed out a fascinating “tell” by Justice Samuel Alito in dealing with stays that he will issue on shadow docket requests. If he is prone to agree with the underlying claim, he’ll issue an unbounded stay on a lower court’s ruling. If he is inclined to disagree with the underlying ruling, he issues a temporary stay with a short deadline before the stay is lifted. He noticed this in particular with the stay that Alito issued in response to the Fifth Circuit’s ruling blocking prescriptions of the abortion drug mifepristone without an in-person visit (an attempt to block the pills from being sent to the various Southern states covered by the Fifth Circuit). In that case, Alito had a short deadline before the stay would be lifted, in contrast to how he tends to treat such stays when he agrees with the result:

First, Justice Alito waited almost 48 hours to act—a period during which there was quite a lot of chaos across the country among doctors, pharmacists, and patients over whether and to what extent they were bound by Friday’s Fifth Circuit decision. 48 hours may not seem like a long time, but for comparison, in November, Alito issued an administrative stay in the Texas redistricting case just 68 minutes after Texas’s application for emergency relief was docketed by the Supreme Court (both of which happened after hours on a Friday night).

Second, and speaking of the Texas case, Alito’s administrative stays in the mifepristone case had something that his administrative stay in the Texas case didn’t—a deadline (next Monday at 5 p.m. ET). This follows a much broader pattern—in which Alito issues indefinite administrative stays in cases in which he appears to be sympathetic to the applicants, but imposes deadlines on the stays in cases in which he doesn’t. Before Monday, the last nine administrative stays in which Alito imposed deadlines were all cases in which at least one of the applicants had been the Biden administration. In contrast, Alito imposed no deadline in the Texas redistricting case; a potentially significant non-delegation case from 2024; and several other cases with … less … of an ideological valence.

To be sure, Alito isn’t the only justice to ever put a deadline on an administrative stay; Justices Gorsuch and Jackson have also each done it exactly once. And although the deadlines tend to create unnecessary tension and stress for both the parties and the Supreme Court’s press corps (who worry about what will happen if the deadline comes and goes with no action—which appeared to happen in the Texas SB4 immigration case in March 2024), they’re not especially significant beyond that. But it certainly seems like a petty way to treat parties differently based upon what you think of their claims.

Then, despite that short deadline (which, to be fair, was extended three days), the Supreme Court waited until 26 minutes past the deadline to issue its unexplained shadow docket ruling keeping the stay in place until after the rest of the proceedings play out (like a cert petition to the Supreme Court, and then a more complete ruling on the merits).

As a site that regularly calls out and complains about shadow docket rulings, and in particular unexplained shadow docket rulings, it’s unfortunate that the majority didn’t explain their reasoning — and equally unfortunate that Alito forced a rushed decision in the first place.

I know that the justices hate the term “shadow docket,” preferring either the “emergency” docket or the “interim” docket, but if they’re going to call it that they should really only use it for issues that are emergencies or for interim relief — the very limited number of scenarios where real unmitigated damage could be done in the interim until a thorough review has been conducted. But that’s just not the case most of the time. Relatedly, those rulings should have extremely narrow and limited precedential power. In theory that was the case until last year when some of the Justices (most notably, Justice Gorsuch) started whining about judges following actual full merits rulings as precedent, rather than magically applying unreasoned shadow docket decisions.

And while there is plenty of analysis elsewhere of the impact of last week’s late night ruling, I wanted to highlight the sheer hypocrisy* of Alito whining about the Justices not giving a reason for their stay. In his own dissent (which is likely why the ruling came out late, coming after Alito’s own needlessly imposed deadline), he starts off by complaining about the lack of any reasoning:

The Court’s unreasoned order granting stays in this case is remarkable.

Given how often Alito has signed onto other “unreasoned” shadow docket rulings when he agreed with them, it’s worth calling out the brazenness of complaining about the very practice he’s helped normalize.

* I use the word “hypocrisy” here deliberately for two reasons. First, because it is incredibly hypocritical. Second, because Alito’s ruling had an embarrassing typo, in which he referred to the litigation involving the Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine as the Alliance for Hypocritic Medicine. This typo was one of many that the Supreme Court had to issue corrections on the filing not once, but twice, before finally fixing this particular typo.

And while the Wall Street Journal can pretend that shadow docket critics don’t care about unexplained shadow docket rulings when they go in their favor, that’s bullshit. Unexplained SCOTUS rulings are bad no matter what. In an ideal world, Alito wouldn’t have imposed an artificially short deadline on the administrative stay, and the court would have given some explanation for its decision — rather than leaving us to read tea leaves from Alito and Thomas’s odd dissents.

For what it’s worth, Vladeck also does an excellent job pointing out the fundamental inanity and contradictions of both Alito and Thomas’s dissents in this case.

First, Justice Thomas went full Comstock Act, arguing that all dispensation of mifepristone through the mail is illegal—never mind that the Department of Justice took a different position as recently as 2022. Putting aside the (well-documented) weaknesses of the Comstock Act arguments, Justice Thomas is simply wrong to argue that parties “cannot, in any legally relevant sense, be irreparably harmed by a court order that makes it more difficult for them to commit crimes.” As the Trump cases have regularly illustrated, a party can be irreparably harmed (at least in view of a majority of the current Court—including Justice Thomas) by a court order that makes it more difficult for them to break the law. Justice Thomas also apparently saw no problem with the Fifth Circuit issuing nationwide relief under the APA—even though he joined a 2023 concurrence by Justice Gorsuch arguing that such universal vacaturs were likely not authorized by the APA. Needless to say, that inconsistency was … not addressed.

And then there’s Justice Alito’s dissent. Alito opened by claiming that “[w]hat is at stake is the perpetration of a scheme to undermine our decision in Dobbs.” Of course, Dobbs insisted that it was returning the question of abortion to the states, whereas the Fifth Circuit ruling would’ve required in-person doctor visits on a nationwide basis. In any event, though, the FDA first got rid of the in-person doctor-visit requirement in 2021—before Dobbs was decided. So the “scheme to undermine Dobbs” began … before Dobbs.

Advertisement

There’s more at the link.

But at a time when the Supreme Court keeps telling us we shouldn’t believe that they make decisions on partisan grounds, it sure would help if they actually stopped doing things differently depending on the partisan valence of each case — something Alito seems to do quite regularly.

It really seems like we need serious reform of the Supreme Court. I’ve already argued that we should increase the number of Justices to 100 or more (to the point where no single Justice matters so much anymore), but any serious reform needs to contend with the abuses of the shadow docket, and making sure that it really is only used for emergency situations where an interim ruling is necessary for maintaining the status quo until a full briefing on the merits can occur.

Justice Alito appears to want to have two different sets of rules, depending on his feelings towards the parties. That’s the opposite of supposedly blind justice. If the court fears that its rulings are seen as illegitimate, then it should start by making sure Alito stops treating parties very differently depending on how aligned they are with his personal ideological beliefs.

Filed Under: 5th circuit, abortion, clarence thomas, louisiana, mifepristone, samuel alito, shadow docket, supreme court

Security researcher Brian Krebs brings us the news that America’s Cybersecurity & Infrastructure Agency (CISA) has had a large store of plaintext passwords, SSH private keys, tokens, and “other sensitive CISA assets” exposed in a public GitHub repo since at least November 2025.

The now-offline public repo—named, somewhat aspirationally, “Private-CISA”—was brought to Krebs’ attention by GitGuardian’s Guillaume Valadon, who was alerted to the repo’s presence by GitGuardian’s public code scans. Krebs says that Valadon approached him after receiving no responses from the Private-CISA repo’s owner.

In an email to Krebs, Valadon claimed that the repo’s commit logs show that GitHub’s default protections against committing secrets—protections designed to protect unwitting or unskilled developers against exactly this kind of stupidness—had been disabled by the repo’s administrator.

Testing by Seralys founder Philippe Caturegli showed that this was not a joke or hoax and that he was able to use the credentials in the Private-CISA repo to gain access to multiple Amazon Web Services GovCloud accounts “at a high privilege level.”

Krebs notes that the repo appeared to be managed by Virginia-based Nightwing, a CISA contractor. Nightwing has so far not commented publicly, instead referring questions back to CISA.

This isn’t the first time CISA has screwed up—in fact, it’s not even the first time this year. In January, polygraph-failing acting CISA Director Madhu Gottumukkala uploaded sensitive government documents to ChatGPT after demanding and receiving an exemption to the agency policy that prohibited ChatGPT’s use by CISA personnel. Gottumukkala was removed from his role in February.